Notebookcheck

Test de l'Amazon Fire HD 10 (2019) : une tablette de 10 pouces à prix d'ami

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduit par Prévots), 12/09/2019

Complète. La Fire HD 10 (2019) est l’une des tablettes de 10 pouces les moins chères du marché, Amazon la proposant à 149,99 $. Alors que ce prix l’empêche d’en faire un produit haut de gamme, sa qualité est suffisante pour satisfaire la plupart des utilisateurs. Lisez ce rapport de test pour voir si la Fire HD 10 (2019) est efficace.

Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Fire Gamme)
Processeur
Mediatek MT8183
Carte graphique
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Mémoire
2048 Mo 
Écran
10.1 pouces 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPP, capacitif, IPS, filtre polarisant, écran totalement laminé, brillant: oui
Disque dur
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 Go 
, , 25.7 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD jusqu'à 512 Go, systèmes de fichier FAT et FAT32, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API : Full, Amazon Alexa
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 9.8 x 262 x 159
Batterie
6300 mAh Lithium-Polymère, Autonomie de la batterie (selon les données du fabricant): 12 h
Système d'exploitation
Amazon Fire OS 7
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 2 MPix 720p
Appareil photo secondaire: 2 MPix 720p
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréos, Clavier: virtuel, adaptateur secteur modulaire (5,2 V / 1,8 A), câble USB (Type A vers Type C), guide de démarrage rapide, Fire OS 7.3, 12 Mois Garantie, fanless
Poids
504 g, Alimentation: 35 g
Prix
149,99 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

NoteDateModèlePoidsÉpaisseurTailleRésolutionBest Price
79%12/19Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3
504 g9.8 mm10.1"1920x1200
75%10/18Alcatel 1T 10
MT8321, Mali-400 MP
415 g9.4 mm10.1"1280x800
78%01/18Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
MT8173, PowerVR GX6250
497 g9.8 mm10.1"1920x1200
81%09/18Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2
475 g7.7 mm10.1"1920x1200
77%01/19Lenovo Tab M10
450, Adreno 506
480 g8.1 mm10.1"1920x1200
81%07/19Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
7904, Mali-G71 MP2
460 g7.5 mm10.1"1920x1200

Comparaison des tailles

262 mm 159 mm 9.8 mm 504 g262 mm 159 mm 9.8 mm 497 g255 mm 155 mm 9.4 mm 415 g245.2 mm 149.4 mm 7.5 mm 460 g243.4 mm 162.2 mm 7.7 mm 475 g242 mm 168 mm 8.1 mm 480 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mali-G72 MP3, MT8183, 32 GB eMMC Flash
321 (min: 302, max: 327) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
Mali-G71 MP2, 7904, 32 GB eMMC Flash
298 (min: 239, max: 314) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
241 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
Lenovo Tab M10
Adreno 506, 450, 16 GB eMMC Flash
207 (min: 98, max: 220) MBit/s ∼64% -36%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.7 MBit/s ∼16% -84%
Alcatel 1T 10
Mali-400 MP, MT8321, 16 GB eMMC Flash
40.3 MBit/s ∼13% -87%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mali-G72 MP3, MT8183, 32 GB eMMC Flash
299 (min: 279, max: 310) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
Mali-G71 MP2, 7904, 32 GB eMMC Flash
290 (min: 274, max: 309) MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Tab M10
Adreno 506, 450, 16 GB eMMC Flash
284 (min: 246, max: 313) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
227 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s ∼18% -82%
Alcatel 1T 10
Mali-400 MP, MT8321, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.8 MBit/s ∼15% -85%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø317 (302-327)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø299 (279-310)

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker Photo
29.4 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
28 ∆E
65.7 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Amazon Fire HD 10 2019: 47.16 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 93.71 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
13 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
2 ∆E
6 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
2 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Amazon Fire HD 10 2019: 9.19 ∆E min: 1.95 - max: 16.7 ∆E
430
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 449 cd/m² Moyenne: 425.4 cd/m² Minimum: 5.09 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 89 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 449 cd/m²
Contraste: 748:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.09
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Alcatel 1T 10
IPS, 1280x800, 10.1
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Lenovo Tab M10
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.1
Screen
-40%
-3%
-34%
-38%
1%
Brightness middle
449
277
-38%
426
-5%
514
14%
339
-24%
401
-11%
Brightness
425
263
-38%
399
-6%
492
16%
327
-23%
396
-7%
Brightness Distribution
89
87
-2%
91
2%
80
-10%
86
-3%
86
-3%
Black Level *
0.6
0.49
18%
0.38
37%
0.96
-60%
0.42
30%
0.5
17%
Contrast
748
565
-24%
1121
50%
535
-28%
807
8%
802
7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.1
5.8
-87%
4.5
-45%
5.42
-75%
5.8
-87%
2.9
6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.4
13.1
-105%
7.9
-23%
9.84
-54%
11.6
-81%
5.8
9%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.8
5.4
-42%
5.2
-37%
6.5
-71%
8.6
-126%
4.1
-8%
Gamma
2.09 105%
2.13 103%
2.23 99%
2.216 99%
2.16 102%
2.36 93%
CCT
7202 90%
7260 90%
6875 95%
6780 96%
8718 75%
7263 89%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 13573 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
25.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 8.4 ms hausse
↘ 17.2 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (24.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
49.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 26 ms hausse
↘ 23.6 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (39.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score
Average of class Tablet (840 - 43802, n=40)
5852 Points ∼13% +26%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
4635 Points ∼11%
Average Mediatek MT8183
4635 Points ∼11% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
3213 Points ∼7% -31%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3148 Points ∼7% -32%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1562 Points ∼4% -66%
Alcatel 1T 10
862 Points ∼2% -81%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
5445 Points ∼9%
Average Mediatek MT8183
5445 Points ∼9% 0%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=57)
4592 Points ∼8% -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
4017 Points ∼7% -26%
Lenovo Tab M10
3897 Points ∼7% -28%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3805 Points ∼7% -30%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3305 Points ∼6% -39%
Alcatel 1T 10
1106 Points ∼2% -80%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=57)
1627 Points ∼26% +16%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1397 Points ∼22%
Average Mediatek MT8183
1397 Points ∼22% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1268 Points ∼20% -9%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1204 Points ∼19% -14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
940 Points ∼15% -33%
Lenovo Tab M10
774 Points ∼12% -45%
Alcatel 1T 10
429 Points ∼7% -69%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
5452 Points ∼44% +8%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (5056 - 5186, n=2)
5121 Points ∼42% +1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
5056 Points ∼41%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
4719 Points ∼38% -7%
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 9615, n=47)
4339 Points ∼35% -14%
Lenovo Tab M10
4238 Points ∼34% -16%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3678 Points ∼30% -27%
Work performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
6456 Points ∼33% +3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
6284 Points ∼32%
Average Mediatek MT8183
6284 Points ∼32% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4895 Points ∼25% -22%
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 11644, n=84)
4849 Points ∼25% -23%
Lenovo Tab M10
4836 Points ∼25% -23%
Alcatel 1T 10
2529 Points ∼13% -60%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2567 Points ∼16%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (2344 - 2567, n=2)
2456 Points ∼16% -4%
Average of class Tablet (1786 - 2992, n=7)
2307 Points ∼15% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
2053 Points ∼13% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (404 - 5819, n=7)
1513 Points ∼10% +58%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
955 Points ∼7%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (936 - 955, n=2)
946 Points ∼7% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
612 Points ∼4% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (493 - 4809, n=7)
1472 Points ∼10% +33%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1110 Points ∼8%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (1080 - 1110, n=2)
1095 Points ∼7% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
725 Points ∼5% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2966 Points ∼37%
Average Mediatek MT8183
2966 Points ∼37% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
1785 Points ∼22% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1755 Points ∼22% -41%
Average of class Tablet (650 - 3919, n=47)
1738 Points ∼22% -41%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1632 Points ∼20% -45%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1386 Points ∼17% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (99 - 6993, n=47)
1759 Points ∼21% +78%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
986 Points ∼12%
Average Mediatek MT8183
986 Points ∼12% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
547 Points ∼7% -45%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
528 Points ∼6% -46%
Lenovo Tab M10
413 Points ∼5% -58%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
399 Points ∼5% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (129 - 5816, n=47)
1543 Points ∼19% +33%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1158 Points ∼14%
Average Mediatek MT8183
1158 Points ∼14% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
646 Points ∼8% -44%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
612 Points ∼8% -47%
Lenovo Tab M10
498 Points ∼6% -57%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
480 Points ∼6% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2963 Points ∼58%
Average Mediatek MT8183
2963 Points ∼58% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
1782 Points ∼35% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1716 Points ∼33% -42%
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4700, n=55)
1667 Points ∼32% -44%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1648 Points ∼32% -44%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1399 Points ∼27% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=55)
3069 Points ∼11% +111%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1455 Points ∼5%
Average Mediatek MT8183
1455 Points ∼5% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
822 Points ∼3% -44%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
754 Points ∼3% -48%
Lenovo Tab M10
712 Points ∼2% -51%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
602 Points ∼2% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=55)
2060 Points ∼15% +26%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1641 Points ∼12%
Average Mediatek MT8183
1641 Points ∼12% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
930 Points ∼7% -43%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
840 Points ∼6% -49%
Lenovo Tab M10
822 Points ∼6% -50%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
701 Points ∼5% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2832 Points ∼58%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (2527 - 2832, n=2)
2680 Points ∼55% -5%
Lenovo Tab M10
1818 Points ∼37% -36%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1744 Points ∼36% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1704 Points ∼35% -40%
Average of class Tablet (729 - 3695, n=63)
1688 Points ∼34% -40%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1363 Points ∼28% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Tablet (55 - 6128, n=63)
1369 Points ∼19% +38%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
990 Points ∼14%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (982 - 990, n=2)
986 Points ∼14% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
542 Points ∼8% -45%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
413 Points ∼6% -58%
Lenovo Tab M10
363 Points ∼5% -63%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
193 Points ∼3% -81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Tablet (70 - 5346, n=65)
1275 Points ∼18% +10%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1157 Points ∼16%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (1136 - 1157, n=2)
1147 Points ∼16% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
639 Points ∼9% -45%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
489 Points ∼7% -58%
Lenovo Tab M10
442 Points ∼6% -62%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
241 Points ∼3% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2818 Points ∼58%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (2587 - 2818, n=2)
2703 Points ∼55% -4%
Lenovo Tab M10
1816 Points ∼37% -36%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1758 Points ∼36% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1702 Points ∼35% -40%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 3678, n=68)
1578 Points ∼32% -44%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1347 Points ∼27% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Tablet (42 - 10647, n=68)
1917 Points ∼17% +34%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1434 Points ∼13%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (1430 - 1434, n=2)
1432 Points ∼13% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
708 Points ∼6% -51%
Lenovo Tab M10
694 Points ∼6% -52%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
598 Points ∼5% -58%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
99 Points ∼1% -93%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1610 Points ∼19%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (1588 - 1610, n=2)
1599 Points ∼19% -1%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 6997, n=69)
1566 Points ∼19% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
814 Points ∼10% -49%
Lenovo Tab M10
804 Points ∼10% -50%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
682 Points ∼8% -58%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
125 Points ∼1% -92%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Average Mediatek MT8183 (18829 - 19883, n=2)
19356 Points ∼22% +3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
18829 Points ∼22%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
15117 Points ∼17% -20%
Lenovo Tab M10
14076 Points ∼16% -25%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51374, n=161)
13506 Points ∼16% -28%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
13310 Points ∼15% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
12994 Points ∼15% -31%
Alcatel 1T 10
7924 Points ∼9% -58%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 194856, n=161)
20616 Points ∼4% +5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
19615 Points ∼4%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (19490 - 19615, n=2)
19553 Points ∼4% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
13794 Points ∼3% -30%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
12771 Points ∼2% -35%
Lenovo Tab M10
12386 Points ∼2% -37%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
11419 Points ∼2% -42%
Alcatel 1T 10
2468 Points ∼0% -87%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Average Mediatek MT8183 (19435 - 19576, n=2)
19506 Points ∼8% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
19435 Points ∼8%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 106954, n=162)
16234 Points ∼7% -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
13608 Points ∼6% -30%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
13227 Points ∼6% -32%
Lenovo Tab M10
12726 Points ∼5% -35%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
11791 Points ∼5% -39%
Alcatel 1T 10
2913 Points ∼1% -85%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
38 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (38 - 38, n=2)
38 fps ∼0% 0%
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=184)
33.3 fps ∼0% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
25 fps ∼0% -34%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
22 fps ∼0% -42%
Lenovo Tab M10
22 fps ∼0% -42%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
20 fps ∼0% -47%
Alcatel 1T 10
7.8 fps ∼0% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
37 fps ∼1%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (37 - 37, n=2)
37 fps ∼1% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
24 fps ∼1% -35%
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=188)
21.7 fps ∼1% -41%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
21 fps ∼1% -43%
Lenovo Tab M10
20 fps ∼1% -46%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
19 fps ∼1% -49%
Alcatel 1T 10
4.4 fps ∼0% -88%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=118)
22.6 fps ∼4% +13%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (20 - 21, n=2)
20.5 fps ∼4% +3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
20 fps ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
13 fps ∼2% -35%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.9 fps ∼2% -50%
Lenovo Tab M10
9.2 fps ∼2% -54%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
8.8 fps ∼2% -56%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
21 fps ∼6%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (20 - 21, n=2)
20.5 fps ∼6% -2%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=124)
15.5 fps ∼4% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
13 fps ∼4% -38%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.5 fps ∼3% -55%
Lenovo Tab M10
8.8 fps ∼2% -58%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
8.6 fps ∼2% -59%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=70)
20.5 fps ∼0% +71%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
12 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (12 - 12, n=2)
12 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
8.1 fps ∼0% -32%
Lenovo Tab M10
6 fps ∼0% -50%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
5.4 fps ∼0% -55%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.9 fps ∼0% -59%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=70)
13.2 fps ∼0% +10%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
12 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (12 - 12, n=2)
12 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
7.7 fps ∼0% -36%
Lenovo Tab M10
5.7 fps ∼0% -52%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
5.3 fps ∼0% -56%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.7 fps ∼0% -61%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 49, n=19)
10.4 fps ∼7% +142%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
4.3 fps ∼3%
Average Mediatek MT8183
4.3 fps ∼3% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
3 fps ∼2% -30%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1.7 fps ∼1% -60%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.8 - 51.1, n=19)
10.9 fps ∼7% +319%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2.6 fps ∼2%
Average Mediatek MT8183
2.6 fps ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1.8 fps ∼1% -31%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1.1 fps ∼1% -58%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 58, n=19)
15.2 fps ∼8% +105%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
7.4 fps ∼4%
Average Mediatek MT8183
7.4 fps ∼4% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
4.9 fps ∼2% -34%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
2.7 fps ∼1% -64%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 134, n=19)
29.3 fps ∼7% +286%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
7.6 fps ∼2%
Average Mediatek MT8183
7.6 fps ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
5 fps ∼1% -34%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
2.8 fps ∼1% -63%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 107, n=46)
14.7 fps ∼4% +99%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
7.4 fps ∼2%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (7.4 - 7.4, n=2)
7.4 fps ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
5.2 fps ∼1% -30%
Lenovo Tab M10
3.4 fps ∼1% -54%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3.2 fps ∼1% -57%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼1% -73%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 47, n=46)
8.82 fps ∼3% +19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
7.4 fps ∼3%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (7.4 - 7.4, n=2)
7.4 fps ∼3% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
5 fps ∼2% -32%
Lenovo Tab M10
3.3 fps ∼1% -55%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3 fps ∼1% -59%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼1% -73%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (8.72 - 21.8, n=4)
13.6 fps ∼0% +27%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
10.72 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek MT8183
10.7 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
8.72 (min: 4.95, max: 24.96) fps ∼0% -19%
Vulkan Medium Native
Average of class Tablet (7.67 - 14.8, n=2)
11.2 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
fps ∼0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
fps ∼0%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (12 - 22.7, n=2)
17.4 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
0 fps ∼0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
fps ∼0%
VRMark - Amber Room
Average of class Tablet (1306 - 3130, n=3)
1953 Score ∼39% +50%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1306 Score ∼26%
Average Mediatek MT8183
1306 Score ∼26% 0%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1016 Points ∼50% +9%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1010 Points ∼50% +9%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
929 Points ∼46%
Average Mediatek MT8183
929 Points ∼46% 0%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=114)
760 Points ∼37% -18%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
742 Points ∼36% -20%
Lenovo Tab M10
735 Points ∼36% -21%
Alcatel 1T 10
10 Points ∼0% -99%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=115)
2245 Points ∼8% +45%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1550 Points ∼5%
Average Mediatek MT8183
1550 Points ∼5% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1073 Points ∼4% -31%
Lenovo Tab M10
949 Points ∼3% -39%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
836 Points ∼3% -46%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
833 Points ∼3% -46%
Alcatel 1T 10
142 Points ∼0% -91%
Memory
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2380 Points ∼32%
Average Mediatek MT8183
2380 Points ∼32% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
2079 Points ∼28% -13%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1948 Points ∼26% -18%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1513 Points ∼20% -36%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 5617, n=115)
1121 Points ∼15% -53%
Lenovo Tab M10
846 Points ∼11% -64%
Alcatel 1T 10
397 Points ∼5% -83%
System
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
3827 Points ∼23%
Average Mediatek MT8183
3827 Points ∼23% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
3517 Points ∼21% -8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3080 Points ∼19% -20%
Lenovo Tab M10
2845 Points ∼17% -26%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=115)
2502 Points ∼15% -35%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2329 Points ∼14% -39%
Alcatel 1T 10
945 Points ∼6% -75%
Overall
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1903 Points ∼23%
Average Mediatek MT8183
1903 Points ∼23% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1681 Points ∼20% -12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1389 Points ∼16% -27%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1312 Points ∼16% -31%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=114)
1310 Points ∼16% -31%
Lenovo Tab M10
1138 Points ∼13% -40%
Alcatel 1T 10
150 Points ∼2% -92%

Légende

 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Alcatel 1T 10 Mediatek MT8321, ARM Mali-400 MP, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 Samsung Exynos 7904, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (16.1 - 110, n=9)
52.9 Points ∼100% +106%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
25.621 Points ∼48%
Average Mediatek MT8183
25.6 Points ∼48% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samung Browser 9.2)
22.14 Points ∼42% -14%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=92)
53 Points ∼100% +16%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
46.39 Points ∼88% +1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
45.743 Points ∼86%
Average Mediatek MT8183
45.7 Points ∼86% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
43.131 Points ∼81% -6%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
29.598 Points ∼56% -35%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
22.219 Points ∼42% -51%
Alcatel 1T 10 (Chrome 69)
10.907 Points ∼21% -76%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Tablet (13 - 182, n=27)
68.7 Points ∼100% +32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
56 Points ∼82% +8%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
52 Points ∼76%
Average Mediatek MT8183
52 Points ∼76% 0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
42 Points ∼61% -19%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
34 Points ∼49% -35%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (5.68 - 132, n=17)
47.2 runs/min ∼100% +70%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
27.7 runs/min ∼59%
Average Mediatek MT8183
27.7 runs/min ∼59% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
21.58 runs/min ∼46% -22%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
8696 Points ∼100% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
8665 Points ∼100%
Average Mediatek MT8183
8665 Points ∼100% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
8570 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=178)
6938 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
5412 Points ∼62% -38%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
3990 Points ∼46% -54%
Alcatel 1T 10 (Chrome 69)
1718 Points ∼20% -80%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Alcatel 1T 10 (Chrome 69)
19084.6 ms * ∼100% -283%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
11447.7 ms * ∼60% -130%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
9248.9 ms * ∼48% -86%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=189)
9175 ms * ∼48% -84%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
4979.3 ms * ∼26%
Average Mediatek MT8183
4979 ms * ∼26% -0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
4054.8 ms * ∼21% +19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
3975.5 ms * ∼21% +20%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Amazon Fire HD 10 2019Alcatel 1T 10Amazon Fire HD 10 2017Huawei MediaPad M5 liteLenovo Tab M10Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-55%
-35%
40%
-20%
-12%
-23%
-50%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
51.96 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
31.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-38%
30.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-42%
72.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
40%
61.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18%
65.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
26%
51 (3.4 - 87.1, n=151)
-2%
47.2 (14 - 73.8, n=60)
-9%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
77.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
39.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-48%
55.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-28%
83.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
83.48 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
81.16 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
69.9 (8.2 - 96.5, n=151)
-9%
65.2 (17.6 - 87.7, n=60)
-16%
Random Write 4KB
23.28
10.1
-57%
9.37
-60%
77.25
232%
11.32
-51%
11.37
-51%
18.1 (0.75 - 77.3, n=194)
-22%
7.02 (0.13 - 170, n=211)
-70%
Random Read 4KB
74.99
12.72
-83%
27.72
-63%
73.47
-2%
52.5
-30%
62.56
-17%
39.9 (3.59 - 117, n=194)
-47%
20.9 (1.04 - 192, n=211)
-72%
Sequential Write 256KB
180.1
83.7
-54%
147.67
-18%
82.56
-54%
52.6
-71%
90.71
-50%
94.8 (14.8 - 189, n=194)
-47%
44.4 (2.04 - 522, n=211)
-75%
Sequential Read 256KB
266.16
137.22
-48%
262.2
-1%
308.15
16%
279.94
5%
300.03
13%
236 (25.8 - 452, n=194)
-11%
121 (6.75 - 1416, n=211)
-55%
0102030405060Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 0.15.0: Ø25.1 (1-27)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; 1.8.1a: Ø16.3 (1-23)
; Shadow Fight 3; 1.19.4: Ø59.1 (24-60)
 27.9 °C26.2 °C28.4 °C 
 30 °C26.1 °C29.5 °C 
 30 °C25.4 °C29.8 °C 
Maximum: 30 °C
Moyenne: 28.1 °C
27.1 °C24.5 °C24.6 °C
29 °C25.2 °C25 °C
28.2 °C25.2 °C25.8 °C
Maximum: 29 °C
Moyenne: 26.1 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  28.2 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 20.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 34.7 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 51.8 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.933.22529.225.23121.5214024.225.45034.331.66324.429.9802522.410024.326.312523.532.216023.839.820020.942.525019.44831518.254.840016.758.250015.862.663014.667.280014.470.310001472.3125014.573.3160014.274.5200014.373.9250013.573.9315014.874.640001576.8500014.480.5630014.972.7800014.569.1100001565.81250014.8551600015.153.5SPL27.186.3N0.963.7median 14.9median 67.2Delta2.511.338.924.330.93226.32827.326.433.130.926.322.224.224.924.43618.14422.552.518.55117.557.714.766.115.266.314.670.11574.213.473.814.370.713.868.813.568.613.772.113.575.114.276.613.971.914.676.414.976.114.978.714.775.214.765.4155326.686.20.869.5median 14.7median 70.11.88.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAmazon Fire HD 10 2019Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.02 / 0.28 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 1.14 / 3.71 / 3.74 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 5.26 / 7.68 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
6300 mAh
Alcatel 1T 10
4000 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
7500 mAh
Lenovo Tab M10
4850 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
6150 mAh
Power Consumption
2%
-25%
-26%
-6%
-28%
Idle Minimum *
1.14
1.01
11%
1.55
-36%
2.8
-146%
0.98
14%
1.66
-46%
Idle Average *
3.71
3.69
1%
4.17
-12%
3.3
11%
4.45
-20%
4.28
-15%
Idle Maximum *
3.74
3.81
-2%
4.25
-14%
3.9
-4%
4.51
-21%
4.44
-19%
Load Average *
5.26
6.17
-17%
7.13
-36%
5.2
1%
5.78
-10%
7.53
-43%
Load Maximum *
7.68
6.19
19%
9.63
-25%
7.2
6%
7.18
7%
9.09
-18%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
28h 11min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 50min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
24h 40min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
3h 48min
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
6300 mAh
Alcatel 1T 10
4000 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
7500 mAh
Lenovo Tab M10
4850 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
6150 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
-43%
-32%
3%
-30%
-7%
Reader / Idle
1691
960
-43%
2162
28%
1290
-24%
1500
-11%
H.264
1480
585
-60%
934
-37%
596
-60%
838
-43%
WiFi v1.3
950
545
-43%
542
-43%
852
-10%
580
-39%
723
-24%
Load
228
274
20%
299
31%
240
5%
347
52%

Points positifs

+ SoC octocoeur puissant
+ Alexa
+ écran 1080p lumineux
+ USB C
+ stockage extensible
+ Google Play Store téléchargeable
+ autonomie
+ prix

Points négatifs

- design en plastique
- Fire OS
- Amazon App Store
- absence de GPS
- appareils photo

Verdict

En test : l'Amazon Fire HD 10 (2019). Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Amazon Allemagne.
En test : l'Amazon Fire HD 10 (2019). Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Amazon Allemagne.

L’Amazon Fire HD 10 (2019) est l’une des tablettes de plus de 10 pouces les moins chères du marché. La tablette à 150 $ propose un bon rapport qualité / prix, même si la publicité sur l’écran de verrouillage en poussera plus d’un à payer 15 $ de plus, pour retirer les "offres spéciales" d’Amazon.

L’on peut se demander à qui la Fire HD 10 (2019) est destinée. Après l’avoir mise à l’épreuve, nous dirions que ceux qui recherchent un appareil avec un grand écran pour naviguer sur le web et profiter de contenus vidéo seraient les meilleurs candidats pour une Fire HD 10 (2019). Alors que son SoC octocœur est puissant, il ne peut faire tourner fluidement tous les jeux récents. De ce fait, le Fire HD 10 (2019) ne devrait pas plaire aux joueurs mobiles. L’absence de fonctionnalités Google en sortie d’usine gênera également ceux qui voudraient jouer jeux les plus récents. S’il est possible de télécharger le Google Play Store, Amazon a annoncé que cela annulait la garantie.

L’Amazon Fire HD 10 (2019) est une tablette à petit prix correcte, avec des performances et une autonomie comparativement bonnes. Faites attention à l’écosystème Amazon, la garantie pouvant être annulée si vous installez le Google Play Store.

La Fire HD 10 (2019) possède également une excellente autonomie. Mais elle possède de mauvais appareils photo, une qualité de construction à la traîne, et pas de GPS, autant d’éléments à prendre en compte avant l’achat. L’interface Fire OS demandera un peu de temps pour qu’on s’y habitue, parce qu’elle ne ressemble ni à Android Stock, ni à la plupart des surcouches Android. Dans l’ensemble, la Fire HD 10 (2019) est idéale pour ceux qui sont déjà dans l’écosystème d’Amazon. L’intégration poussée d’Alexa et le Mode Show sont de bonnes fonctionnalités, qui aident la Fire HD 10 (2019) à se distinguer de la concurrence.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 - 12/02/2019 v7
Manuel Masiero

Châssis
64 / 98 → 66%
Clavier
71 / 80 → 89%
Dispositif de pointage
83%
Connectivité
36 / 70 → 51%
Poids
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Autonomie
92%
Écran
84%
Performances en jeu
13 / 78 → 16%
Performances dans les applications
52 / 92 → 57%
Chauffe
95%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
72 / 91 → 79%
Appareil photo
30 / 85 → 35%
Moyenne
67%
79%
Tablet - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test de l'Amazon Fire HD 10 (2019) : une tablette de 10 pouces à prix d'ami
Manuel Masiero, 2019-12- 9 (Update: 2019-12- 9)