Notebookcheck

Test de l'Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 : tablette avec plus de RAM et la norme QI

De deux à trois. Après notre test de la Fire HD 8 (2020), nous jetons maintenant un oeil à la Fire HD 8 Plus (2020), pour voir si les 3 Go de RAM font vraiment mieux que les 2 Go. La charge QI semble plus intéressante, qui améliore le rapport qualité / prix de la tablette.
Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, T. Hinum (traduit par Prévots),
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Fire Gamme)
Processeur
MediaTek MT8168 4 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Carte graphique
ARM Mali-G52 MP1
Mémoire
3072 Mo 
Écran
8 pouces 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel 189 PPP, capacitif, IPS, brillant: oui, 60 Hz
Disque dur
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 Go 
, 26 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm, USB C, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD (FAT, FAT32, jusqu'à 1 TB), Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 9.7 x 202 x 137
Batterie
4850 mAh Lithium-Ion, Autonomie de la batterie (selon les données du fabricant): 12 h
Charging
wireless charging
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 2 MPix 1 600 x 1 200 pixels, vidéos jusqu'à 720p à 30 FPS
Appareil photo secondaire: 2 MPix 1 600 x 1 200 pixels, vidéos jusqu'à 720p à 30 FPS
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: 2 haut-parleurs, Clavier: virtuel, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, chargeur USB plug, câble USB C, 12 Mois Garantie, fanless
Poids
355 g, Alimentation: 87 g
Prix
120 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Épaisseur
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
81 %
09/20
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
MT8168, Mali-G52 MP2
355 g9.7 mm8"1280x800
81 %
06/20
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
MT8168, Mali-G52 MP2
355 g9.7 mm8"1280x800
81 %
02/20
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320
305 g8.2 mm8"1280x800
80 %
01/20
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
SD 429, Adreno 504
345 g8 mm8"1280x800
79 %
03/19
Alldocube M8 T801
MT6797X, Mali-T880 MP4
345 g8.48 mm8"1920x1200

Comparaison des tailles

215 mm 128 mm 9.7 mm 363 g215 mm 122.9 mm 8.48 mm 345 g210 mm 124.4 mm 8 mm 345 g202 mm 137 mm 9.7 mm 355 g199 mm 129 mm 8.2 mm 305 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8168, 32 GB eMMC Flash
330 (313min - 336max) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
294 (256min - 307max) MBit/s ∼89% -11%
Alldocube M8 T801
Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 32 GB eMMC Flash
235 MBit/s ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Adreno 504, SD 429, 32 GB eMMC Flash
101 (86min - 107max) MBit/s ∼31% -69%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
99.9 (90min - 106max) MBit/s ∼30% -70%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8168, 32 GB eMMC Flash
348 (175min - 353max) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
271 (183min - 335max) MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Alldocube M8 T801
Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 32 GB eMMC Flash
195 MBit/s ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Adreno 504, SD 429, 32 GB eMMC Flash
115 (109min - 121max) MBit/s ∼33% -67%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
98.4 (82min - 110max) MBit/s ∼28% -72%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø330 (313-336)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø342 (175-353)

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Main cameraPanoramaZoom (Fire HD 8 Plus: 2x, Rest: 5x)Low light
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
53.8 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
66.3 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
50.2 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
77.4 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
93 ∆E
71.1 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
24 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020: 47.34 ∆E min: 13.67 - max: 92.97 ∆E
ColorChecker
5.4 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
4 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020: 5.38 ∆E min: 2.11 - max: 10.21 ∆E
429
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
438
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 490 cd/m² Moyenne: 447.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4.64 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 88 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 490 cd/m²
Contraste: 2130:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø6
78.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
TFT, 1280x800, 8
Alldocube M8 T801
IPS, 1920x1200, 8
Screen
6%
-107%
-23%
-53%
-69%
Brightness middle
490
501
2%
359
-27%
379
-23%
377
-23%
317.5
-35%
Brightness
447
463
4%
358
-20%
346
-23%
372
-17%
320
-28%
Brightness Distribution
88
85
-3%
89
1%
88
0%
87
-1%
94
7%
Black Level *
0.23
0.25
-9%
0.85
-270%
0.21
9%
0.29
-26%
0.5
-117%
Contrast
2130
2004
-6%
422
-80%
1805
-15%
1300
-39%
635
-70%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4
3.6
10%
6.8
-70%
3.8
5%
6.1
-53%
6.12
-53%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.3
8.4
-1%
17.3
-108%
7.5
10%
10.9
-31%
13.72
-65%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
1
50%
7.6
-280%
5
-150%
6.6
-230%
5.8
-190%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.17 101%
2.19 100%
2.23 99%
2.13 103%
2.12 104%
CCT
6618 98%
6473 100%
7160 91%
7514 87%
7861 83%
7633 85%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 61730 Hz ≤ 3 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 61730 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 3 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 61730 Hz est élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 17714 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
32 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 18 ms hausse
↘ 14 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (24.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
47.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 22.8 ms hausse
↘ 24.8 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (38.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
OpenCL Score 5.2
Average of class Tablet (529 - 3466, n=4)
1264 Points ∼1% +138%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
531 Points ∼0%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (529 - 531, n=3)
530 Points ∼0% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
529 Points ∼0% 0%
Vulkan Score 5.2
Average of class Tablet (79 - 3473, n=5)
1004 Points ∼1% +102%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
496 Points ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
490 Points ∼1% -1%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (484 - 496, n=3)
490 Points ∼1% -1%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (498 - 4712, n=17)
1971 Points ∼16% +295%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
566 Points ∼5% +13%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (499 - 504, n=3)
501 Points ∼4% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
500 Points ∼4% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
499 Points ∼4%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (135 - 1127, n=17)
580 Points ∼36% +311%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
168 Points ∼10% +19%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
144 Points ∼9% +2%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (141 - 144, n=3)
143 Points ∼9% +1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
141 Points ∼9%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4946 Points ∼32% +10%
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 12466, n=57)
4737 Points ∼31% +5%
Alldocube M8 T801
4695 Points ∼31% +4%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (4454 - 4753, n=3)
4572 Points ∼30% +1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
4509 Points ∼29%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
4454 Points ∼29% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
4267 Points ∼28% -5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
3130 Points ∼20% -31%
Work performance score
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
7019 Points ∼35% +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5986 Points ∼30% +6%
Alldocube M8 T801
5984 Points ∼30% +6%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (5620 - 6311, n=3)
5866 Points ∼29% +4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
5667 Points ∼28%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
5620 Points ∼28% -1%
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 13629, n=93)
5156 Points ∼26% -9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
4165 Points ∼21% -27%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (1152 - 3658, n=17)
2312 Points ∼57% +26%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1833 Points ∼45%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1823 Points ∼45% -1%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (1811 - 1833, n=3)
1822 Points ∼45% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1786 Points ∼44% -3%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (402 - 8745, n=17)
1898 Points ∼22% +213%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (606 - 613, n=3)
609 Points ∼7% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
607 Points ∼7%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
606 Points ∼7% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
460 Points ∼5% -24%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (469 - 6226, n=17)
1777 Points ∼26% +149%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (712 - 719, n=3)
715 Points ∼11% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
713 Points ∼11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
712 Points ∼11% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
550 Points ∼8% -23%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (650 - 4756, n=57)
1890 Points ∼24% +48%
Alldocube M8 T801
1372 Points ∼17% +7%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1277 Points ∼16%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (1263 - 1277, n=3)
1268 Points ∼16% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1265 Points ∼16% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1155 Points ∼14% -10%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
939 Points ∼12% -26%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
716 Points ∼9% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (99 - 9453, n=57)
1857 Points ∼19% +230%
Alldocube M8 T801
1108 Points ∼12% +97%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
563 Points ∼6%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (562 - 564, n=3)
563 Points ∼6% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
562 Points ∼6% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
253 Points ∼3% -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
210 Points ∼2% -63%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
120 Points ∼1% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (129 - 7369, n=57)
1661 Points ∼20% +158%
Alldocube M8 T801
1157 Points ∼14% +80%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
643 Points ∼8%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (641 - 643, n=3)
642 Points ∼8% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
641 Points ∼8% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
302 Points ∼4% -53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
257 Points ∼3% -60%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
147 Points ∼2% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4702, n=64)
1784 Points ∼31% +39%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1280 Points ∼22%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (1268 - 1280, n=3)
1273 Points ∼22% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1268 Points ∼22% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1145 Points ∼20% -11%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
943 Points ∼16% -26%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
739 Points ∼13% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=64)
3090 Points ∼11% +246%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
893 Points ∼3% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
892 Points ∼3%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (892 - 893, n=3)
892 Points ∼3% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
458 Points ∼2% -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
336 Points ∼1% -62%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
202 Points ∼1% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=64)
2163 Points ∼16% +126%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
956 Points ∼7% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
956 Points ∼7%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (955 - 956, n=3)
956 Points ∼7% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
517 Points ∼4% -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
428 Points ∼3% -55%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
241 Points ∼2% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average of class Tablet (729 - 4096, n=73)
1783 Points ∼34% +43%
Alldocube M8 T801
1654 Points ∼32% +33%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1243 Points ∼24%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1233 Points ∼24% -1%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (1222 - 1243, n=3)
1233 Points ∼24% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1188 Points ∼23% -4%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
903 Points ∼17% -27%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
855 Points ∼16% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Tablet (55 - 8548, n=73)
1482 Points ∼17% +159%
Alldocube M8 T801
995 Points ∼12% +74%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
573 Points ∼7%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (570 - 574, n=3)
572 Points ∼7% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
570 Points ∼7% -1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
233 Points ∼3% -59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
153 Points ∼2% -73%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
126 Points ∼1% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Tablet (70 - 6850, n=75)
1385 Points ∼7% +113%
Alldocube M8 T801
1092 Points ∼5% +68%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
651 Points ∼3%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (647 - 651, n=3)
650 Points ∼3% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
647 Points ∼3% -1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
279 Points ∼1% -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
190 Points ∼1% -71%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
155 Points ∼1% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Average of class Tablet (56 - 4104, n=77)
1668 Points ∼32% +36%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1228 Points ∼23% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1228 Points ∼23%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (1225 - 1228, n=3)
1227 Points ∼23% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1178 Points ∼22% -4%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
903 Points ∼17% -26%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
815 Points ∼15% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Tablet (42 - 12725, n=77)
2057 Points ∼16% +128%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
901 Points ∼7%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (898 - 901, n=3)
900 Points ∼7% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
898 Points ∼7% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
427 Points ∼3% -53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
364 Points ∼3% -60%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
212 Points ∼2% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average of class Tablet (53 - 8675, n=78)
1697 Points ∼18% +77%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
958 Points ∼10%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (955 - 958, n=3)
956 Points ∼10% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
955 Points ∼10% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
484 Points ∼5% -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
428 Points ∼4% -55%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
254 Points ∼3% -73%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
15709 Points ∼18% +5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
15151 Points ∼18% +1%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (14979 - 15151, n=3)
15059 Points ∼17% +1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
14979 Points ∼17%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
14822 Points ∼17% -1%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51436, n=173)
14298 Points ∼17% -5%
Alldocube M8 T801
9771 Points ∼11% -35%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
8724 Points ∼10% -42%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 221941, n=173)
24384 Points ∼4% +82%
Alldocube M8 T801
14192 Points ∼3% +6%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
13426 Points ∼2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
13333 Points ∼2% -1%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (13089 - 13426, n=3)
13283 Points ∼2% -1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
7658 Points ∼1% -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
6897 Points ∼1% -49%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
5446 Points ∼1% -59%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 110846, n=174)
18399 Points ∼7% +34%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
13743 Points ∼6%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
13698 Points ∼6% 0%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (13479 - 13743, n=3)
13640 Points ∼6% -1%
Alldocube M8 T801
12895 Points ∼5% -6%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
8580 Points ∼3% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
7879 Points ∼3% -43%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
5942 Points ∼2% -57%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Alldocube M8 T801
39 fps ∼0%
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=192)
35.2 fps ∼0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
21 fps ∼0%
Average MediaTek MT8168
21 fps ∼0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
14 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
11 fps ∼0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
10 fps ∼0%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Alldocube M8 T801
35 fps ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
33 fps ∼1%
Average MediaTek MT8168
33 fps ∼1%
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=196)
23.1 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
21 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
17 fps ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
16 fps ∼0%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=126)
23.8 fps ∼4%
Alldocube M8 T801
19 fps ∼3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
12 fps ∼2%
Average MediaTek MT8168
12 fps ∼2%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
6.6 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
4.8 fps ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
3.6 fps ∼1%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
24 fps ∼7%
Average MediaTek MT8168
24 fps ∼7%
Alldocube M8 T801
19 fps ∼5%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=132)
16.7 fps ∼5%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
12 fps ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
9.5 fps ∼3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
7.3 fps ∼2%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=78)
21.3 fps ∼0%
Alldocube M8 T801
13 fps ∼0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
7.6 fps ∼0%
Average MediaTek MT8168
7.6 fps ∼0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4.3 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.2 fps ∼0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
2.3 fps ∼0%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
17 fps ∼0%
Average MediaTek MT8168
17 fps ∼0%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=78)
14.2 fps ∼0%
Alldocube M8 T801
12 fps ∼0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
8.5 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
6.9 fps ∼0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
5.1 fps ∼0%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 49, n=28)
9.81 fps ∼6%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
5.5 fps ∼4%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (5.5 - 5.5, n=2)
5.5 fps ∼4%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
2.9 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
2 fps ∼1%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.8 - 51.1, n=28)
9.62 fps ∼4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1.8 fps ∼1%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (1.8 - 1.8, n=2)
1.8 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
0.85 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
0.8 fps ∼0%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 58, n=28)
14.6 fps ∼7%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
9.7 fps ∼5%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (9.7 - 9.7, n=2)
9.7 fps ∼5%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4.6 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.1 fps ∼2%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 134, n=28)
25.7 fps ∼4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
5.1 fps ∼1%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (5.1 - 5.1, n=2)
5.1 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
2.3 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1.7 fps ∼0%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 107, n=54)
15.3 fps ∼4%
Alldocube M8 T801
7.3 fps ∼2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
4.8 fps ∼1%
Average MediaTek MT8168
4.8 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1.9 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1.8 fps ∼0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
fps ∼0%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 47, n=54)
9.51 fps ∼4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
9.2 fps ∼3%
Average MediaTek MT8168
9.2 fps ∼3%
Alldocube M8 T801
7.3 fps ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.8 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
3.6 fps ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
fps ∼0%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (78450 - 751846, n=14)
299758 Points ∼40% +232%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
90442 Points ∼12% 0%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (90422 - 90442, n=2)
90432 Points ∼12% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
90422 Points ∼12%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
79125 Points ∼11% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
78450 Points ∼10% -13%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
809 Points ∼40% +11%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=122)
767 Points ∼38% +5%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
756 Points ∼37% +3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
731 Points ∼36%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (730 - 731, n=2)
731 Points ∼36% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
730 Points ∼36% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
597 Points ∼29% -18%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=123)
2362 Points ∼8% +150%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
947 Points ∼3% 0%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (946 - 947, n=2)
947 Points ∼3% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
946 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
487 Points ∼2% -49%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
472 Points ∼2% -50%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
333 Points ∼1% -65%
Memory
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1416 Points ∼16%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (1406 - 1416, n=2)
1411 Points ∼16% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1406 Points ∼16% -1%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 6751, n=123)
1262 Points ∼14% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1258 Points ∼14% -11%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1151 Points ∼13% -19%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
663 Points ∼7% -53%
System
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=123)
2661 Points ∼16% +49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1945 Points ∼12% +9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1802 Points ∼11% +1%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (1788 - 1802, n=2)
1795 Points ∼11% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1788 Points ∼11%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1539 Points ∼9% -14%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
1200 Points ∼7% -33%
Overall
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=122)
1392 Points ∼16% +21%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1150 Points ∼14% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1150 Points ∼14%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (1150 - 1150, n=2)
1150 Points ∼14% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
987 Points ∼12% -14%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
891 Points ∼11% -23%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
631 Points ∼7% -45%

Légende

 
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 MediaTek MT8168, ARM Mali-G52 MP1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 MediaTek MT8168, ARM Mali-G52 MP1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M8 HD Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Qualcomm Adreno 504, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Alldocube M8 T801 MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=104)
58.8 Points ∼100% +150%
Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105)
30.352 Points ∼52% +29%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
25.645 Points ∼44% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
25.067 Points ∼43% +6%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
23.989 Points ∼41% +2%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (23.6 - 24, n=2)
23.8 Points ∼40% +1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser)
23.559 Points ∼40%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10)
16.717 Points ∼28% -29%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Tablet (13 - 182, n=39)
73.3 Points ∼100% +144%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
34 Points ∼46% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
32 Points ∼44% +7%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
30 Points ∼41% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser)
30 Points ∼41%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (30 - 30, n=2)
30 Points ∼41% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10)
25 Points ∼34% -17%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=189)
7546 Points ∼100% +79%
Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105)
5909 Points ∼78% +40%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
4378 Points ∼58% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
4297 Points ∼57% +2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser)
4222 Points ∼56%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (4115 - 4222, n=2)
4169 Points ∼55% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
4115 Points ∼55% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10)
2902 Points ∼38% -31%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10)
14320.9 ms * ∼100% -29%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
11253.8 ms * ∼79% -1%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (11103 - 11254, n=2)
11178 ms * ∼78% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser)
11102.9 ms * ∼78%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
10893.8 ms * ∼76% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
10654.6 ms * ∼74% +4%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=201)
8903 ms * ∼62% +20%
Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105)
7429.3 ms * ∼52% +33%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020Amazon Fire HD 8 2020Amazon Fire HD 8 2018Lenovo Tab M8 HDSamsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290Alldocube M8 T801Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
1%
-46%
-2%
2%
-40%
-13%
-40%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
34.03 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-45%
64.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
69.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
14%
52.1 (3.4 - 87.1, n=166)
-15%
49.7 (14 - 73.8, n=70)
-19%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
51.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-40%
83.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
87.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
71.1 (8.2 - 96.5, n=166)
-16%
67.7 (17.6 - 87.7, n=70)
-20%
Random Write 4KB
15.62
15.72
1%
12.25
-22%
15.84
1%
16.89
8%
10.01
-36%
18.9 (0.75 - 89.5, n=209)
21%
10.5 (0.13 - 262, n=221)
-33%
Random Read 4KB
69.06
67.61
-2%
26.98
-61%
77.44
12%
57.77
-16%
19.5
-72%
40.9 (3.59 - 117, n=209)
-41%
24.7 (1.04 - 230, n=221)
-64%
Sequential Write 256KB
100.19
103.95
4%
41.89
-58%
79.55
-21%
108.54
8%
103.02
3%
96.7 (14.8 - 189, n=209)
-3%
52.9 (2.04 - 732, n=221)
-47%
Sequential Read 256KB
314.2
315.01
0%
158.46
-50%
297.09
-5%
291.87
-7%
142.8
-55%
239 (25.8 - 452, n=209)
-24%
143 (6.75 - 1789, n=221)
-54%
 28 °C27.8 °C30 °C 
 29.2 °C27.9 °C30.4 °C 
 27.5 °C27.3 °C30 °C 
Maximum: 30.4 °C
Moyenne: 28.7 °C
28.4 °C26.6 °C26.7 °C
29.4 °C29.1 °C27.1 °C
26.1 °C27 °C27 °C
Maximum: 29.4 °C
Moyenne: 27.5 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  24.2 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34.6 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
Relevé thermique, au-dessus.
Relevé thermique, au-dessus.
Relevé thermique - Au-dessous.
Relevé thermique - Au-dessous.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.8402519.632.53123.930.74024.324.95030.533.96318.723.68020.42810018.625.712517.535.116019.544.820019.244.825016.451.331515.254.840014.255.950014.759.963013.863.180014.663.1100014.164.7125013.566160014.465200013.966.7250013.866.6315013.865.1400014.765.3500014.266.3630014.465.9800014.966.4100001565.11250015.1571600015.347.6SPL26.577.2N0.840.7median 14.7median 63.1Delta0.87.329.83325.226.621.626.924.717.929.625.522.523.925.126.320.125.819.926.920.836.917.641.117.647.417.450.316.153.613.95514.559.216.161.314.56714.471.513.672.113.973.514.576.114.477.814.877.614.776.814.873.614.971.915.170.91562.615.147.426.9860.959.1median 14.9median 62.61.512.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAmazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Lenovo Tab M8 HD audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.27 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.74 / 2.81 / 2.83 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 3.73 / 4.97 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
4850 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
4850 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
4750 mAh
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5100 mAh
Alldocube M8 T801
5500 mAh
Power Consumption
-4%
-29%
24%
10%
-144%
Idle Minimum *
0.74
0.72
3%
0.97
-31%
0.66
11%
0.62
16%
3.4
-359%
Idle Average *
2.81
2.97
-6%
3.26
-16%
2.15
23%
2.68
5%
5.1
-81%
Idle Maximum *
2.83
2.99
-6%
3.37
-19%
2.18
23%
2.7
5%
5.3
-87%
Load Average *
3.73
4.02
-8%
5.68
-52%
2.48
34%
3.61
3%
6
-61%
Load Maximum *
4.97
5.1
-3%
6.21
-25%
3.49
30%
4
20%
11.5
-131%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 29min
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
4850 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
4850 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
4750 mAh
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5100 mAh
Alldocube M8 T801
5500 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3
869
902
4%
490
-44%
1124
29%
831
-4%
420
-52%

Points positifs

+ prix
+ autonomie
+ WLAN
+ luminosité de l'écran

Points négatifs

- OS orienté Amazon
- Amazon App Store peu fourni
- absence de publicité en payant plus cher
- hausse de la RAM peu utile

Verdict - La charge QI fait la différence

En test : l'Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus (2020). Modèle de test fourni par Amazon Allemagne.
En test : l'Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus (2020). Modèle de test fourni par Amazon Allemagne.

Pendant la durée de notre test avec la Fire HD 8 Plus (2020), le gain de RAM n'a pas apporté beaucoup d'avantages. Les utilisateurs qui voudraient un peu jouer, ou qui laissent plusieurs applis tourner en fond profiteront le plus de ce gain. Mais au-delà de ça, la version Plus, comme la Fire HD 8 (2020), possède un design moderne et des performances en hausse, qui rendent la mise à jour intéressante, surtout pour ceux qui ont les modèles précédents. La charge sans-fil en particulier est un avantage certain.

Tout comme l'Amazon Fire HD 8, la version Plus est recommandée avant tout aux clients Amazon.

Cependant, vu nos résultats des tests WLAN sur batterie, l'on voit que la Fire HD 8 Plus (2020) devra être branchée plus rapidement qu'avec l'ancienne version. L'autonomie n'est néanmoins pas mauvaise. Dans tous les cas, et quelle que soit la version, la Fire HD 8 ne mérite qu'une recommandation d'achat, pour les clients Amazon qui utilisent l'OS ajusté pour des besoins ciblés. Ces clients pourront avoir la Fire HD 8 (2020) avec publicités pour moins de 100 €, tandis que le modèle Plus ne coûte que 16 € de plus... Sans publicités ou "offres spéciales", les deux modèles Fire 8 coûtent 112 et 132 €. Ceux qui voudraient 64 Go de stockage au lieu de 32 devront payer 30 € de plus.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 - 08/10/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Châssis
75 / 98 → 77%
Clavier
69 / 80 → 86%
Dispositif de pointage
87%
Connectivité
38 / 70 → 54%
Poids
86 / 40-88 → 95%
Autonomie
90%
Écran
85%
Performances en jeu
8 / 78 → 11%
Performances dans les applications
43 / 92 → 47%
Chauffe
95%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 82%
Appareil photo
34 / 85 → 40%
Moyenne
68%
81%
Tablet - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test de l'Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 : tablette avec plus de RAM et la norme QI
Mike Wobker, 2020-09-15 (Update: 2020-09-15)