Test de la Lenovo Tab M8 HD : navigation et streaming à petit prix

Name: Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Brand: Lenovo

Android Pie dans un châssis fin. Lenovo a mis à jour sa gamme de tablettes abordables, et a créé un appareil Android Pie avec un écran de 8 pouces, la Tab M8 HD. La tablette est disponible pour 140 $ et, tant que les utilisateurs ne s’attendent pas à des performances élevées, ils ne seront pas déçus par ce qu’ils auront.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduit par Prévots), 02/12/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Touchscreen Tablet Android

Exemplaire de test fourni par cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Note	Date	Modèle	Poids	Épaisseur	Taille	Résolution
81 %	02/20	Lenovo Tab M8 HD Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320	305 g	8.2 mm	8.00"	1280x800
77 %	11/18	Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, Mali-T720	363 g	9.7 mm	8.00"	1280x800
79 %	03/19	Alldocube M8 T801 MT6797X, Mali-T880 MP4	345 g	8.48 mm	8.00"	1920x1200
83 %	05/18	Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 Kirin 960, Mali-G71 MP8	316 g	7.3 mm	8.40"	2560x1600
80 %	01/20	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 SD 429, Adreno 504	345 g	8 mm	8.00"	1280x800

Comparaison des tailles

Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 Alldocube M8 T801 Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 Lenovo Tab M8 HD ❌

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Tab M8 HD PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash	271 (183^min - 335^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 32 GB eMMC Flash	205 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Alldocube M8 T801 Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 32 GB eMMC Flash	195 MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 Adreno 504, SD 429, 32 GB eMMC Flash	115 (109^min - 121^max) MBit/s ∼42% -58%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash	98.4 (82^min - 110^max) MBit/s ∼36% -64%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Tab M8 HD PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash	294 (256^min - 307^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Alldocube M8 T801 Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 32 GB eMMC Flash	235 MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 32 GB eMMC Flash	203 MBit/s ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 Adreno 504, SD 429, 32 GB eMMC Flash	101 (86^min - 107^max) MBit/s ∼34% -66%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash	99.9 (90^min - 106^max) MBit/s ∼34% -66%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø291 (256-307)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø271 (183-335)

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

Cliquer pour charger les images

Lenovo Tab M8 HD

Canon EOS 70 D

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 (2019)

Google Pixel 4

Cliquer pour charger les images

Lenovo Tab M8 HD

Canon EOS 70 D

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 (2019)

Google Pixel 4

Cliquer pour charger les images

Lenovo Tab M8 HD

Canon EOS 70 D

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 (2019)

Google Pixel 4

ColorChecker Lenovo Tab M8 HD: 6.06 ∆E min: 1.67 - max: 12.28 ∆E

Lenovo Tab M8 HD - Mire de test. — Mire de test.

Lenovo Tab M8 HD - Mire de test (1 lux).


340 cd/m²	359 cd/m²	332 cd/m²
343 cd/m²	379 cd/m²	345 cd/m²
335 cd/m²	345 cd/m²	332 cd/m²

Homogénéité de la luminosité

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 379 cd/m² Moyenne: 345.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.06 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 88 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 379 cd/m²
Contraste: 1805:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.8 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
85.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23

	Lenovo Tab M8 HD IPS, 1280x800, 8.00	Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 IPS, 1280x800, 8.00	Alldocube M8 T801 IPS, 1920x1200, 8.00	Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 IPS, 2560x1600, 8.40	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 TFT, 1280x800, 8.00
Screen		-81%	-48%	-49%	-25%
Brightness middle	379	359 -5%	317.5 -16%	405 7%	377 -1%
Brightness	346	358 3%	320 -8%	392 13%	372 8%
Brightness Distribution	88	89 1%	94 7%	92 5%	87 -1%
Black Level *	0.21	0.85 -305%	0.5 -138%	0.67 -219%	0.29 -38%
Contrast	1805	422 -77%	635 -65%	604 -67%	1300 -28%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	3.8	6.8 -79%	6.12 -61%	5.78 -52%	6.1 -61%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	7.5	17.3 -131%	13.72 -83%	9.82 -31%	10.9 -45%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	5	7.6 -52%	5.8 -16%	7.2 -44%	6.6 -32%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.19 ^100%	2.12 ^104%	2.278 ^97%	2.13 ^103%
CCT	7514 ^87%	7160 ^91%	7633 ^85%	8405 ^77%	7861 ^83%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9713 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 151500) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.

↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc
37.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 19.6 ms hausse
37.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 17.6 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 94 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (24.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
60 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 27.6 ms hausse
60 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 32.4 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (38.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Geekbench 5.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (134 - 767, n=7, last 2 years)	329 Points ∼8% +104%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	168 Points ∼4% +4%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	161 Points ∼4%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M	161 Points ∼4% 0%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (375 - 2441, n=7, last 2 years)	993 Points ∼6% +85%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	552 Points ∼3% +3%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	538 Points ∼3%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M	538 Points ∼3% 0%

Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	6509 Points ∼10%
Average of class Tablet (1127 - 13066, n=10, last 2 years)	4600 Points ∼7%
Alldocube M8 T801	3590 Points ∼6%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M	2471 Points ∼4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	1751 Points ∼3%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	1896 Points ∼23%
Average of class Tablet (431 - 4493, n=10, last 2 years)	1472 Points ∼18%
Alldocube M8 T801	1352 Points ∼17%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M	825 Points ∼10%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	636 Points ∼8%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score
Average of class Tablet (2719 - 14982, n=25, last 2 years)	7612 Points ∼38% +8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	7053 Points ∼35% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	7019 Points ∼35%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (6194 - 7019, n=2)	6607 Points ∼33% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	5986 Points ∼30% -15%
Alldocube M8 T801	5984 Points ∼30% -15%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	4165 Points ∼21% -41%
Work 2.0 performance score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	6006 Points ∼39% +21%
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 12603, n=29, last 2 years)	5855 Points ∼38% +18%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	4946 Points ∼32%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M	4946 Points ∼32% 0%
Alldocube M8 T801	4695 Points ∼31% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	4267 Points ∼28% -14%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	3130 Points ∼20% -37%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet (2902 - 110846, n=27, last 2 years)	35798 Points ∼13% +317%
Alldocube M8 T801	12895 Points ∼5% +50%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	8580 Points ∼3%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (7671 - 8580, n=2)	8126 Points ∼3% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	7879 Points ∼3% -8%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	5942 Points ∼2% -31%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Average of class Tablet (2468 - 221941, n=27, last 2 years)	55764 Points ∼9% +628%
Alldocube M8 T801	14192 Points ∼2% +85%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	7658 Points ∼1%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (6785 - 7658, n=2)	7222 Points ∼1% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	6897 Points ∼1% -10%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	5446 Points ∼1% -29%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (7561 - 51436, n=27, last 2 years)	20710 Points ∼21% +40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	15709 Points ∼16% +6%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	14822 Points ∼15%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (14128 - 14822, n=2)	14475 Points ∼15% -2%
Alldocube M8 T801	9771 Points ∼10% -34%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	8724 Points ∼9% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average of class Tablet (210 - 9238, n=29, last 2 years)	2568 Points ∼23% +431%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	2513 Points ∼22% +419%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	484 Points ∼4%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (456 - 484, n=2)	470 Points ∼4% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	428 Points ∼4% -12%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	254 Points ∼2% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Tablet (172 - 14283, n=29, last 2 years)	3301 Points ∼20% +673%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	2501 Points ∼15% +486%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	427 Points ∼3%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (403 - 427, n=2)	415 Points ∼2% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	364 Points ∼2% -15%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	212 Points ∼1% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	2555 Points ∼47% +183%
Average of class Tablet (774 - 4482, n=29, last 2 years)	2150 Points ∼40% +138%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	1178 Points ∼22% +30%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	903 Points ∼17%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (840 - 903, n=2)	872 Points ∼16% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	815 Points ∼15% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (242 - 13682, n=30, last 2 years)	3093 Points ∼23% +498%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	2415 Points ∼18% +367%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	517 Points ∼4%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (494 - 517, n=2)	506 Points ∼4% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	428 Points ∼3% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	241 Points ∼2% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (201 - 42751, n=30, last 2 years)	5898 Points ∼14% +1188%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	2461 Points ∼6% +437%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	458 Points ∼1%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (445 - 458, n=2)	452 Points ∼1% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	336 Points ∼1% -27%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	202 Points ∼0% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	2268 Points ∼33% +141%
Average of class Tablet (781 - 4702, n=30, last 2 years)	2226 Points ∼32% +136%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	1145 Points ∼17% +21%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	943 Points ∼14%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (807 - 943, n=2)	875 Points ∼13% -7%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	739 Points ∼11% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Tablet (169 - 7098, n=28, last 2 years)	2055 Points ∼10% +637%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	1919 Points ∼9% +588%
Alldocube M8 T801	1092 Points ∼5% +291%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	279 Points ∼1%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (268 - 279, n=2)	274 Points ∼1% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	190 Points ∼1% -32%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	155 Points ∼1% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Tablet (139 - 9612, n=28, last 2 years)	2286 Points ∼20% +881%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	1778 Points ∼15% +663%
Alldocube M8 T801	995 Points ∼9% +327%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	233 Points ∼2%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (225 - 233, n=2)	229 Points ∼2% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	153 Points ∼1% -34%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	126 Points ∼1% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	2653 Points ∼45% +194%
Average of class Tablet (729 - 4201, n=28, last 2 years)	2253 Points ∼38% +150%
Alldocube M8 T801	1654 Points ∼28% +83%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	1188 Points ∼20% +32%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	903 Points ∼15%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (828 - 903, n=2)	866 Points ∼15% -4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	855 Points ∼15% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (167 - 8911, n=28, last 2 years)	2462 Points ∼25% +715%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	2023 Points ∼21% +570%
Alldocube M8 T801	1157 Points ∼12% +283%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (302 - 305, n=2)	304 Points ∼3% +1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	302 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	257 Points ∼3% -15%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	147 Points ∼1% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (136 - 25707, n=28, last 2 years)	3435 Points ∼13% +1258%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	1910 Points ∼7% +655%
Alldocube M8 T801	1108 Points ∼4% +338%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (253 - 260, n=2)	257 Points ∼1% +2%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	253 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	210 Points ∼1% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	120 Points ∼0% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	2552 Points ∼32% +172%
Average of class Tablet (776 - 4756, n=28, last 2 years)	2345 Points ∼29% +150%
Alldocube M8 T801	1372 Points ∼17% +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	1155 Points ∼14% +23%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	939 Points ∼12%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (763 - 939, n=2)	851 Points ∼11% -9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	716 Points ∼9% -24%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	51 fps ∼2% +143%
Average of class Tablet (9.2 - 120, n=32, last 2 years)	46 fps ∼1% +119%
Alldocube M8 T801	35 fps ∼1% +67%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	21 fps ∼1%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (19 - 21, n=2)	20 fps ∼1% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	17 fps ∼1% -19%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	16 fps ∼0% -24%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Average of class Tablet (4.4 - 588, n=32, last 2 years)	104 fps ∼1% +643%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	78 fps ∼1% +457%
Alldocube M8 T801	39 fps ∼0% +179%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	14 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (13 - 14, n=2)	13.5 fps ∼0% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	11 fps ∼0% -21%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	10 fps ∼0% -29%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (4.4 - 120, n=30, last 2 years)	34.4 fps ∼9% +187%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	24 fps ∼7% +100%
Alldocube M8 T801	19 fps ∼5% +58%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	12 fps ∼3%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (12 - 12, n=2)	12 fps ∼3% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	9.5 fps ∼3% -21%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	7.3 fps ∼2% -39%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (3.8 - 345, n=31, last 2 years)	58.8 fps ∼6% +791%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	39 fps ∼4% +491%
Alldocube M8 T801	19 fps ∼2% +188%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	6.6 fps ∼1%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (6.3 - 6.6, n=2)	6.45 fps ∼1% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	4.8 fps ∼1% -27%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	3.6 fps ∼0% -45%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.8 - 107, n=31, last 2 years)	23.7 fps ∼1% +179%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	14 fps ∼0% +65%
Alldocube M8 T801	12 fps ∼0% +41%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	8.5 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (7.5 - 8.5, n=2)	8 fps ∼0% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	6.9 fps ∼0% -19%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	5.1 fps ∼0% -40%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.4 - 227, n=31, last 2 years)	39.7 fps ∼1% +823%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	27 fps ∼1% +528%
Alldocube M8 T801	13 fps ∼0% +202%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	4.3 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (4 - 4.3, n=2)	4.15 fps ∼0% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	3.2 fps ∼0% -26%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	2.3 fps ∼0% -47%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 87, n=28, last 2 years)	16.9 fps ∼6% +369%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	9.3 fps ∼4% +158%
Alldocube M8 T801	7.3 fps ∼3% +103%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	3.8 fps ∼1% +6%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	3.6 fps ∼1%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (3.2 - 3.6, n=2)	3.4 fps ∼1% -6%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	fps ∼0% -100%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 150, n=28, last 2 years)	28.2 fps ∼6% +1384%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	16 fps ∼4% +742%
Alldocube M8 T801	7.3 fps ∼2% +284%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	1.9 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (1.9 - 1.9, n=2)	1.9 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	1.8 fps ∼0% -5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	fps ∼0% -100%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2 - 75, n=28, last 2 years)	12.5 fps ∼8% +331%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	2.9 fps ∼2%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (2.7 - 2.9, n=2)	2.8 fps ∼2% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	2 fps ∼1% -31%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.8 - 70, n=28, last 2 years)	11.7 fps ∼5% +1276%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	0.85 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (0.85 - 0.85, n=2)	0.85 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	0.8 fps ∼0% -6%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (3.1 - 102, n=28, last 2 years)	18.5 fps ∼9% +302%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	4.6 fps ∼2%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (4.3 - 4.6, n=2)	4.45 fps ∼2% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	3.1 fps ∼2% -33%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 191, n=28, last 2 years)	32.3 fps ∼6% +1304%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	2.3 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (2.3 - 2.3, n=2)	2.3 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	1.7 fps ∼0% -26%

AnTuTu v8
UX
Average of class Tablet (10934 - 106205, n=22, last 2 years)	54171 Points ∼47% +254%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	15291 Points ∼13%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M	15291 Points ∼13% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	10934 Points ∼9% -28%
MEM
Average of class Tablet (13757 - 113467, n=22, last 2 years)	55348 Points ∼45% +116%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	27445 Points ∼22% +7%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	25641 Points ∼21%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M	25641 Points ∼21% 0%
GPU
Average of class Tablet (4118 - 544434, n=22, last 2 years)	140511 Points ∼26% +3312%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	4783 Points ∼1% +16%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	4118 Points ∼1%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M	4118 Points ∼1% 0%
CPU
Average of class Tablet (30304 - 276446, n=22, last 2 years)	105647 Points ∼38% +210%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	35288 Points ∼13% +4%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	34075 Points ∼12%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M	34075 Points ∼12% 0%
Total Score
Average of class Tablet (75328 - 1037960, n=22, last 2 years)	355676 Points ∼34% +350%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	79125 Points ∼8%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M	79125 Points ∼8% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	78450 Points ∼8% -1%

AnTuTu v7
Total Score
Average of class Tablet (21974 - 354840, n=3, last 2 years)	195803 Points ∼35%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	181614 Points ∼32%
Alldocube M8 T801	105872 Points ∼19%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M	61753 Points ∼11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	41017 Points ∼7%
CPU
Average of class Tablet (7870 - 110287, n=3, last 2 years)	69184 Points ∼42%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	62327 Points ∼38%
Alldocube M8 T801	44590 Points ∼27%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M	29549 Points ∼18%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	20724 Points ∼13%
GPU
Average of class Tablet (0 - 151310, n=3, last 2 years)	73300 Points ∼23%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	65542 Points ∼20%
Alldocube M8 T801	28298 Points ∼9%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M	7993 Points ∼2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	2432 Points ∼1%
UX
Average of class Tablet (9960 - 79058, n=3, last 2 years)	44511 Points ∼55%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	42825 Points ∼53%
Alldocube M8 T801	27020 Points ∼33%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M	18552 Points ∼23%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	13368 Points ∼16%
MEM
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	10920 Points ∼34%
Average of class Tablet (4144 - 14185, n=3, last 2 years)	8808 Points ∼27%
Alldocube M8 T801	5964 Points ∼18%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M	5659 Points ∼17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	4493 Points ∼14%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	2982 Points ∼35% +235%
Average of class Tablet (157 - 5592, n=22, last 2 years)	2162 Points ∼26% +143%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	987 Points ∼12% +11%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	891 Points ∼11%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (745 - 891, n=2)	818 Points ∼10% -8%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	631 Points ∼7% -29%
System
Average of class Tablet (946 - 8994, n=22, last 2 years)	4141 Points ∼25% +169%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	3940 Points ∼24% +156%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	1945 Points ∼12% +26%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	1539 Points ∼9%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (1434 - 1539, n=2)	1487 Points ∼9% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	1200 Points ∼7% -22%
Memory
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	3985 Points ∼44% +246%
Average of class Tablet (464 - 6751, n=22, last 2 years)	2656 Points ∼29% +131%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	1258 Points ∼14% +9%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	1151 Points ∼13%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (607 - 1151, n=2)	879 Points ∼10% -24%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	663 Points ∼7% -42%
Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	4143 Points ∼14% +778%
Average of class Tablet (143 - 12048, n=22, last 2 years)	3050 Points ∼11% +546%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	487 Points ∼2% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (472 - 482, n=2)	477 Points ∼2% +1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	472 Points ∼2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	333 Points ∼1% -29%
Web
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	1215 Points ∼56% +61%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1409, n=22, last 2 years)	879 Points ∼41% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	809 Points ∼37% +7%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD	756 Points ∼35%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (733 - 756, n=2)	745 Points ∼34% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	597 Points ∼28% -21%

Légende

Lenovo Tab M8 HD Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Alldocube M8 T801 MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Qualcomm Adreno 504, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M

Average of class Tablet

JetStream 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (11.2 - 402, n=33, last 2 years)	99.6 Points ∼100% +288%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)	56.76 Points ∼57% +121%
Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105)	30.352 Points ∼30% +18%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)	25.645 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)	25.067 Points ∼25% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (23.5 - 25.6, n=2)	24.6 Points ∼25% -4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10)	16.717 Points ∼17% -35%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Tablet (13 - 221, n=34, last 2 years)	83.4 Points ∼100% +145%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)	72 Points ∼86% +112%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)	34 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)	32 Points ∼38% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (30 - 34, n=2)	32 Points ∼38% -6%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10)	25 Points ∼30% -26%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (5.68 - 210, n=27, last 2 years)	64.1 runs/min ∼100% +314%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M	15.5 runs/min ∼24% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)	15.49 runs/min ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)	13.5 runs/min ∼21% -13%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (1712 - 62946, n=34, last 2 years)	18754 Points ∼100% +328%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)	11338 Points ∼60% +159%
Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105)	5909 Points ∼32% +35%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)	4378 Points ∼23%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (4332 - 4378, n=2)	4355 Points ∼23% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)	4297 Points ∼23% -2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10)	2902 Points ∼15% -34%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10)	14320.9 ms * ∼100% -31%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)	10893.8 ms * ∼76%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (10740 - 10894, n=2)	10817 ms * ∼76% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)	10654.6 ms * ∼74% +2%
Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105)	7429.3 ms * ∼52% +32%
Average of class Tablet (464 - 19212, n=34, last 2 years)	5900 ms * ∼41% +46%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)	3734 ms * ∼26% +66%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

	Lenovo Tab M8 HD	Amazon Fire HD 8 2018	Alldocube M8 T801	Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290	Average 32 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-45%	-34%	60%	5%	-8%	83%
Sequential Read 256KB	297.09	158.46 -47%	142.8 -52%	268.62 -10%	291.87 -2%	240 (25.8 - 452, n=225) -19%	467 (123 - 1789, n=29, last 2 years) 57%
Sequential Write 256KB	79.55	41.89 -47%	103.02 30%	132.24 66%	108.54 36%	97.6 (14.8 - 189, n=225) 23%	202 (53.1 - 732, n=29, last 2 years) 154%
Random Read 4KB	77.44	26.98 -65%	19.5 -75%	62.8 -19%	57.77 -25%	41.7 (3.59 - 117, n=225) -46%	85.5 (24.7 - 230, n=29, last 2 years) 10%
Random Write 4KB	15.84	12.25 -23%	10.01 -37%	65.1 311%	16.89 7%	19.9 (0.75 - 89.5, n=225) 26%	61.3 (4.27 - 262, n=29, last 2 years) 287%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	83.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	51.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -39%		84.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	87.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%	71.8 (8.2 - 96.5, n=178) -14%	79 (39 - 87.1, n=26, last 2 years) -6%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	64.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	34.03 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -47%		70.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 10%	69.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 9%	52.9 (3.4 - 87.1, n=178) -18%	59.9 (32.1 - 71.7, n=26, last 2 years) -7%

Asphalt 9: Legends

; High Quality: Ø11.7 (1-22)

; Standard / low: Ø18.7 (11-24)

Arena of Valor

; high HD: Ø43.2 (24-60)

; min: Ø56.2 (48-61)

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge


24.5 °C	24.1 °C	26.2 °C
25.3 °C	24 °C	25.9 °C
24.5 °C	24.9 °C	25.6 °C

Maximum: 26.2 °C
Moyenne: 25 °C


24.2 °C	24.2 °C	24.7 °C
24.2 °C	24.6 °C	25.7 °C
24.2 °C	24.4 °C	25.9 °C

Maximum: 25.9 °C
Moyenne: 24.7 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 26.8 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the average of 30.5 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the average of 34.5 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.5 °C / 87 F.

Lenovo Tab M8 HD - Relevé thermique, au-dessus. — Relevé thermique, au-dessus.

Lenovo Tab M8 HD - Relevé thermique - Au-dessous. — Relevé thermique - Au-dessous.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo Tab M8 HD audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique

Éteint/en veille	0.01 / 0.14 Watts
Au repos	0.66 / 2.15 / 2.18 Watts
Fortement sollicité	2.48 / 3.49 Watts


Légende: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Lenovo Tab M8 HD 5100 mAh	Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 4750 mAh	Alldocube M8 T801 5500 mAh	Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 5100 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 5100 mAh
Power Consumption		-72%	-213%	-142%	-21%
Idle Minimum *	0.66	0.97 -47%	3.4 -415%	2.1 -218%	0.62 6%
Idle Average *	2.15	3.26 -52%	5.1 -137%	3.74 -74%	2.68 -25%
Idle Maximum *	2.18	3.37 -55%	5.3 -143%	4.33 -99%	2.7 -24%
Load Average *	2.48	5.68 -129%	6 -142%	6.32 -155%	3.61 -46%
Load Maximum *	3.49	6.21 -78%	11.5 -230%	9.13 -162%	4 -15%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie

Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)		59h 41min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		18h 44min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p		28h 16min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)		6h 14min

	Lenovo Tab M8 HD 5100 mAh	Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 4750 mAh	Alldocube M8 T801 5500 mAh	Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 5100 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 5100 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie		-53%	-63%	-48%	-23%
Reader / Idle	3581	1168 -67%		1154 -68%	3132 -13%
H.264	1696	498 -71%		701 -59%	934 -45%
WiFi v1.3	1124	490 -56%	420 -63%	627 -44%	831 -26%
Load	374	316 -16%		298 -20%	342 -9%

Points positifs

+ carte micro SD configurable en tant que stockage interne

+ Wifi

+ design

+ poids

+ logiciels utiles

Points négatifs

- appareil photo

- absence de charge rapide

- haut-parleur

Verdict

En test : la Lenovo Tab M8 HD. Modèle de test fourni par cyberport.

La Lenovo Tab M8 HD se présente comme une tablette classique pour la navigation et le visionnage vidéo occasionnel. Son autonomie en particulier est impressionnante, tout comme son design et ses finitions. Notre modèle surpasse clairement l’Amazon Fire HD 8 dans ces domaines. Ses performances sont un peu meilleures que celles de la tablette Amazon, bien que la Tab M8 HD ne soit toujours pas au niveau des autres concurrentes.

La Tab M8 HD de Lenovo est une bonne alternative sur le marché des tablettes abordables.

Il ne faut cependant pas en attendre trop des appareils photo. Le stockage interne réduit est également un peu décevant, bien que ce problème puisse être contourné en formatant la carte micro SD en tant que stockage interne. On sera divisé sur le nombre d’applis préinstallées par Lenovo. Le mode enfant laisse une bonne impression, et le gestionnaire de la tablette pourrait aider les utilisateurs les moins expérimentés à ne pas rester trop longtemps dans le menu des réglages d’Android. Ceux dont les exigences ne sont pas particulièrement élevées seront très séduits par la Tab M8 HD.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Lenovo Tab M8 HD - 2020-01-06 01/06/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Châssis

83 / 98 → 84%

Clavier

65 / 80 → 82%

Dispositif de pointage

86%

Connectivité

37 / 70 → 53%

Poids

86 / 40-88 → 96%

Autonomie

93%

Écran

83%

Performances en jeu

4 / 78 → 5%

Performances dans les applications

43 / 92 → 47%

Chauffe

97%

Nuisance sonore

100%

Audio

71 / 91 → 78%

Appareil photo

32 / 85 → 38%

Moyenne

68%

81%

Tablet - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Katherine Bodner - Translator - 271 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!