Notebookcheck

Test de l'Apple iPhone SE 2020 : smartphone compact avec un processeur puissant

Classique mis à jour. Avec la deuxième génération de l'iPhons SE, Apple reprend visuellement l'iPhone 8. Si cela donne - pour les standards actuels - un smartphone plutôt compact avec quelques fonctionnalités haut de gammes, le ratio surface / écran est plutôt mauvais. Mais le prix de base peu élevé est un avantage certain pour l'iPhone SE 2.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Stefanie Voigt (traduit par Prévots),
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Processeur
Apple A13 Bionic 6 x - 2.7 GHz, Lightning and Thunder
Carte graphique
Apple A13 Bionic GPU
Mémoire
3072 Mo 
Écran
4.7 pouces 16:9, 1334 x 750 pixel 326 PPP, capacitif, Retina HD, IPS, brillant: oui, 60 Hz
Disque dur
128 GB NVMe, 128 Go 
, 119.3 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: Lightning, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, capteur de proximité et gyroscope 3 axes, baromètre, boussole, iBeacon micro-location, Lightning port
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM / GPRS / Edge (850, 900, 1 800 et 1 900 MHz), UMTS / HSPA+ (850, 900, 1 700 / 2 100, 1 900 et 2 100 MHz), LTE (bandes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48 et 66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 7.3 x 138.4 x 67.3
Batterie
6.96 Wh, 1822 mAh Lithium-Ion, 3,82 V
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Apple iOS 13
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 12 MPix (f/1,8, zoom digital x5, OIS, vidéos UHD)
Appareil photo secondaire: 7 MPix (f/2,2, vidéo Full HD)
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: deux haut-parleurs, Clavier: virtuel, chargeur, câble Lightning, autocollant, écouteurs, documentation, 12 Mois Garantie, IP67, DAS (tête) : 0,98 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Annoncées
03/01/2020
Poids
148 g, Alimentation: 45 g
Prix
529 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Appareils du comparatif

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Drive
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
85 %
06/20
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
148 g128 GB NVMe4.7"1334x750
86 %
11/19
Google Pixel 4
SD 855, Adreno 640
162 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash5.7"2280x1080
87 %
12/19
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
194 g64 GB SSD6.1"1792x828
83 %
11/17
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU
148 gApple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)4.7"1334x750
86 %
03/20
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
SD 855, Adreno 640
186 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.7"2400x1080
84 %
02/20
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
SD 730G, Adreno 618
208 g256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080

Comparaison des tailles

162.5 mm 75.6 mm 8.1 mm 186 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.7 mm 208 g150.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.3 mm 194 g147.1 mm 68.8 mm 8.2 mm 162 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 148 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 148 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
618 (321min - 653max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
612 (473min - 652max) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
563 (490min - 597max) MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
526 (413min - 655max) MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
329 (284min - 350max) MBit/s ∼53% -47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=598)
280 MBit/s ∼45% -55%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
818 (400min - 892max) MBit/s ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
591 (564min - 609max) MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
529 (204min - 603max) MBit/s ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
327 (155min - 377max) MBit/s ∼40% -60%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 (306min - 319max) MBit/s ∼38% -62%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=598)
267 MBit/s ∼33% -67%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø608 (321-653)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø804 (400-892)
GPS Apple iPhone SE (2020) : vue générale.
GPS Apple iPhone SE (2020) : vue générale.
GPS Apple iPhone SE (2020) : pont.
GPS Apple iPhone SE (2020) : pont.
GPS Apple iPhone SE (2020) : lac.
GPS Apple iPhone SE (2020) : lac.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : pont.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : pont.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : lac.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : lac.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3Scene 4
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker
23.7 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
31 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
34.5 ∆E
48 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
47.4 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
43 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
30.8 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone SE 2020: 33.05 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 48 ∆E
ColorChecker
19.8 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
14 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone SE 2020: 10.45 ∆E min: 2.9 - max: 22.06 ∆E
630
cd/m²
672
cd/m²
677
cd/m²
647
cd/m²
688
cd/m²
676
cd/m²
633
cd/m²
636
cd/m²
675
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
Retina HD
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 688 cd/m² Moyenne: 659.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.84 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 92 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 688 cd/m²
Contraste: 2457:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Apple iPhone SE 2020
IPS, 1334x750, 4.7
Apple iPhone 8
IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.7
Apple iPhone 11
IPS, 1792x828, 6.1
Google Pixel 4
OLED, 2280x1080, 5.7
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Super AMOLED Plus, 2400x1080, 6.7
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen
-18%
-19%
8%
-71%
-132%
Brightness middle
688
604
-12%
679
-1%
554
-19%
622
-10%
579
-16%
Brightness
659
580
-12%
671
2%
550
-17%
630
-4%
576
-13%
Brightness Distribution
92
91
-1%
93
1%
94
2%
96
4%
89
-3%
Black Level *
0.28
0.44
-57%
0.68
-143%
Contrast
2457
1373
-44%
999
-59%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1
1.2
-20%
0.8
20%
0.8
20%
2.7
-170%
4.61
-361%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.2
2.3
-5%
2.4
-9%
1.4
36%
5.9
-168%
7.72
-251%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.7
1.6
6%
1.1
35%
1.3
24%
3
-76%
4.2
-147%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.25 98%
2.24 98%
2.22 99%
2.09 105%
2.244 98%
CCT
6790 96%
6688 97%
6610 98%
6213 105%
6246 104%
7201 90%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 17567 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
21.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 6 ms hausse
↘ 15.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
36.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 9.2 ms hausse
↘ 27.6 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (38.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
3281 Points ∼93%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2573 Points ∼73% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
2722 Points ∼77% -17%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3531 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (3281 - 3531, n=2)
3406 Points ∼96% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=118)
1936 Points ∼55% -41%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
1336 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
746 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
740 Points ∼55% -45%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1342 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (1336 - 1342, n=2)
1339 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=118)
550 Points ∼41% -59%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2898 Points ∼66%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4112 Points ∼93% +42%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
1854 Points ∼42% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4418 Points ∼100% +52%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3202 Points ∼72% +10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3018 Points ∼68% +4%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (2898 - 3219, n=3)
3045 Points ∼69% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=524)
2219 Points ∼50% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
7847 Points ∼94%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6383 Points ∼76% -19%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
2783 Points ∼33% -65%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7148 Points ∼85% -9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2492 Points ∼30% -68%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8374 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (7847 - 8374, n=3)
8113 Points ∼97% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 10043, n=524)
2134 Points ∼25% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
5688 Points ∼91%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5685 Points ∼90% 0%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
2505 Points ∼40% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6285 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2567 Points ∼41% -55%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6006 Points ∼96% +6%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (5688 - 6067, n=3)
5920 Points ∼94% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8269, n=525)
1993 Points ∼32% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4052 Points ∼96%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4072 Points ∼97% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4208 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3155 Points ∼75% -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3877 Points ∼92% -4%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (3411 - 4052, n=3)
3780 Points ∼90% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=556)
2135 Points ∼51% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
20135 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9217 Points ∼46% -54%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10410 Points ∼52% -48%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3648 Points ∼18% -82%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
20154 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (17853 - 20154, n=3)
19381 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=556)
2875 Points ∼14% -86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
10699 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7196 Points ∼67% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7842 Points ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3522 Points ∼33% -67%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
10427 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (9199 - 10699, n=3)
10108 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=556)
2417 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2892 Points ∼67%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4199 Points ∼97% +45%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
1989 Points ∼46% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4324 Points ∼100% +50%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3202 Points ∼74% +11%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3218 Points ∼74% +11%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (2429 - 4038, n=4)
3144 Points ∼73% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=605)
2100 Points ∼49% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4573 Points ∼72%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6214 Points ∼98% +36%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
2581 Points ∼41% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6312 Points ∼100% +38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2245 Points ∼36% -51%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5761 Points ∼91% +26%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (4573 - 6088, n=4)
5537 Points ∼88% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 9008, n=605)
1801 Points ∼29% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4050 Points ∼71%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5615 Points ∼98% +39%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
2421 Points ∼42% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5727 Points ∼100% +41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2405 Points ∼42% -41%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4901 Points ∼86% +21%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (4050 - 5471, n=4)
4706 Points ∼82% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7400, n=606)
1716 Points ∼30% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2857 Points ∼63%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4540 Points ∼100% +59%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
1774 Points ∼39% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4201 Points ∼93% +47%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3228 Points ∼71% +13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (2857 - 3839, n=2)
3348 Points ∼74% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=648)
1970 Points ∼43% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
9218 Points ∼90%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8765 Points ∼85% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9670 Points ∼94% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3485 Points ∼34% -62%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (9218 - 11302, n=2)
10260 Points ∼100% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12611, n=647)
2384 Points ∼23% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
6168 Points ∼82%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7263 Points ∼97% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7500 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3424 Points ∼46% -44%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (6168 - 7893, n=2)
7031 Points ∼94% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9549, n=650)
2048 Points ∼27% -67%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
33851 Points ∼84%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37641 Points ∼94% +11%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
24131 Points ∼60% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
40137 Points ∼100% +19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33925 Points ∼85% 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (33851 - 33925, n=4)
33885 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=792)
15527 Points ∼39% -54%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
209431 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
102168 Points ∼49% -51%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
112424 Points ∼54% -46%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
108114 Points ∼52% -48%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
208190 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (206190 - 209431, n=4)
208254 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=790)
26885 Points ∼13% -87%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
97290 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
73984 Points ∼76% -24%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
62006 Points ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
78551 Points ∼81% -19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
97216 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (96826 - 97290, n=4)
97152 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=790)
20998 Points ∼22% -78%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
250 fps ∼81%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
139 fps ∼45% -44%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
161.3 fps ∼52% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
166 fps ∼54% -34%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
309 fps ∼100% +24%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (250 - 322, n=4)
292 fps ∼94% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=794)
45.4 fps ∼15% -82%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼50%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
88 fps ∼73% +47%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
119.8 fps ∼100% +100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (59 - 60, n=4)
59.8 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=803)
31.4 fps ∼26% -48%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
149 fps ∼89%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
75 fps ∼45% -50%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
70.8 fps ∼42% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
99 fps ∼59% -34%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
168 fps ∼100% +13%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (149 - 175, n=4)
162 fps ∼96% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=699)
26.8 fps ∼16% -82%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼52%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
67 fps ∼59% +12%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
114.5 fps ∼100% +91%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼52% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼52% 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (60 - 60, n=4)
60 fps ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=707)
22.6 fps ∼20% -62%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
93 fps ∼83%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
57 fps ∼51% -39%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
54 fps ∼48% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
69 fps ∼62% -26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
112 fps ∼100% +20%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (93 - 117, n=4)
106 fps ∼95% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=562)
21.6 fps ∼19% -77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼55%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps ∼46% -15%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
109.7 fps ∼100% +83%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼52% -5%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼55% 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (60 - 60, n=4)
60 fps ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=564)
19.6 fps ∼18% -67%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼40% -60%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
25 fps ∼42% -58%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps ∼17% -83%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
45 fps ∼75% -25%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (45 - 60, n=4)
52.8 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=317)
11.3 fps ∼19% -81%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
31 fps ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
13 fps ∼42% -58%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼55% -45%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
6.7 fps ∼22% -78%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼94% -6%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (29 - 33, n=4)
30.5 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=315)
8.06 fps ∼26% -74%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33 fps ∼55% -45%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
38 fps ∼63% -37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼27% -73%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
57 fps ∼95% -5%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (57 - 60, n=4)
58.8 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=321)
16.9 fps ∼28% -72%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
72 fps ∼94%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32 fps ∼42% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼55% -42%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼23% -75%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
74 fps ∼96% +3%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (72 - 87, n=4)
77 fps ∼100% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=320)
19.4 fps ∼25% -73%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
59 fps ∼91%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
34 fps ∼53% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
43 fps ∼67% -27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼98% +7%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (59 - 73, n=4)
64.5 fps ∼100% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=487)
14.5 fps ∼22% -75%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
30 fps ∼50% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
37 fps ∼62% -38%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
49 fps ∼82% -18%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (48 - 60, n=4)
54.3 fps ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=491)
12.8 fps ∼21% -79%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
489463 Points ∼92%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
376698 Points ∼70% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
451559 Points ∼84% -8%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
534558 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (489463 - 534558, n=2)
512011 Points ∼96% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=115)
316595 Points ∼59% -35%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1601 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1414 Points ∼81%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
 
1745 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=733)
824 Points ∼47%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9307 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8598 Points ∼51%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
 
16996 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=733)
2525 Points ∼15%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6458 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5287 Points ∼82%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
 
2350 Points ∼36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=733)
1881 Points ∼29%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8058 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8515 Points ∼60%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
 
14189 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=733)
3482 Points ∼25%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
Points ∼0%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5277 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4837 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
 
5607 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=733)
1778 Points ∼32%
Basemark GPU 1.2
Metal Medium Native (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
211.18 (93.41min - 435.35max) fps ∼100%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
 
211 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80.8 - 211, n=2)
146 fps ∼69% -31%
1920x1080 Metal Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
136.56 (72.64min - 258.13max) fps ∼100%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
 
137 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (113 - 137, n=2)
125 fps ∼91% -8%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
139.668 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (129 - 140, n=4)
133 Points ∼95% -5%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
132.886 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
63.778 Points ∼46% -54%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
56.678 Points ∼41% -59%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=192)
40.7 Points ∼29% -71%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
293.36 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (279 - 302, n=4)
293 Points ∼100% +5%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
278.62 Points ∼95%
Apple iPhone 8
206.7 Points ∼70% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
112.3 Points ∼38% -60%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
107.51 Points ∼37% -61%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=622)
47.3 Points ∼16% -83%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
158 runs/min ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
157 runs/min ∼99% -1%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (153 - 158, n=4)
155 runs/min ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
62.2 runs/min ∼39% -61%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
61.8 runs/min ∼39% -61%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=174)
42.8 runs/min ∼27% -73%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
184 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (146 - 184, n=4)
174 Points ∼95% +19%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
146 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
95 Points ∼52% -35%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
94 Points ∼51% -36%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=259)
69.7 Points ∼38% -52%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Apple A13 Bionic (48819 - 49388, n=4)
49087 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
48991 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
48819 Points ∼99% 0%
Apple iPhone 8
34163 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
22942 Points ∼47% -53%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
22572 Points ∼46% -54%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=790)
7898 Points ∼16% -84%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=816)
9735 ms * ∼100% -1670%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
2138.6 ms * ∼22% -289%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
2072.2 ms * ∼21% -277%
Apple iPhone 8
730.8 ms * ∼8% -33%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
572.8 ms * ∼6% -4%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (550 - 573, n=4)
566 ms * ∼6% -3%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
549.9 ms * ∼6%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

0102030405060Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 0.18.0: Ø59.5 (58-60)
; Battle Bay; 4.8.22668: Ø59.5 (57-60)
 40.5 °C40.5 °C36.8 °C 
 39 °C38.6 °C36.5 °C 
 36.8 °C37.2 °C36.5 °C 
Maximum: 40.5 °C
Moyenne: 38 °C
37.7 °C40.2 °C41.4 °C
36.8 °C37.7 °C41.3 °C
36.3 °C38.5 °C39.2 °C
Maximum: 41.4 °C
Moyenne: 38.8 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  31 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.827.42526.227.43123.322.94021.925502825.86319.924.48019.125.510019.928.612516.53916019.64920017.549.325017.54831513.951.540013.952.850015.858.863015.260.78001466.310001468.6125013.972160013.473.9200013.874.6250014.375.931501477.1400014.576.9500014.677.9630014.576800014.772.61000015.166.5125001558.31600014.847.1SPL26.586.4N0.862.5median 14.6median 66.3Delta112.631.639.125.437.625.336.932.940.833.635.231.633.328.433.82733.520.842.82250.821.351.520.849.821.253.919.45619.558.717.761.617.962.917.866.217.368.217.468.416.768.517.267.318.26817.969.817.668.817.767.517.861.717.959.118.160.618.256.23078.41.343.6median 17.9median 61.61.37.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPhone SE 2020Apple iPhone 8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPhone SE 2020 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.1 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.44 / 1.56 / 1.63 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 2.32 / 4.12 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPhone SE 2020
1822 mAh
Google Pixel 4
2800 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
4500 mAh
Average Apple A13 Bionic
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-70%
-63%
-27%
-42%
-42%
-53%
Idle Minimum *
0.44
1.01
-130%
0.56
-27%
0.54
-23%
0.58
-32%
0.625 (0.44 - 0.92, n=4)
-42%
0.891 (0.2 - 3.4, n=895)
-103%
Idle Average *
1.56
1.63
-4%
2.99
-92%
1.63
-4%
1.55
1%
2.36 (1.56 - 2.99, n=4)
-51%
1.757 (0.6 - 6.2, n=894)
-13%
Idle Maximum *
1.63
1.69
-4%
3.02
-85%
1.67
-2%
1.64
-1%
2.41 (1.63 - 3.02, n=4)
-48%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=895)
-25%
Load Average *
2.32
4.67
-101%
4.17
-80%
2.74
-18%
4.29
-85%
3.32 (2.32 - 4.17, n=4)
-43%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=889)
-78%
Load Maximum *
4.12
8.78
-113%
5.44
-32%
7.78
-89%
8.03
-95%
5.29 (4.12 - 6.18, n=4)
-28%
6.11 (1.2 - 14.2, n=889)
-48%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
32h 18min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
11h 34min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
11h 21min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
2h 23min
Apple iPhone SE 2020
1822 mAh
Google Pixel 4
2800 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
5260 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
-16%
56%
3%
44%
60%
Reader / Idle
1938
1007
-48%
2765
43%
1629
-16%
2504
29%
H.264
681
617
-9%
1147
68%
698
2%
1183
74%
WiFi v1.3
694
460
-34%
866
25%
585
-16%
823
19%
1112
60%
Load
143
185
29%
267
87%
202
41%
222
55%

Points positifs

+ luminosité et couleurs de l'écran
+ SoC réactif
+ Wifi 6 et nombre de bandes LTE
+ certifié IP67
+ charge sans-fil
+ léger et fin
+ localisation

Points négatifs

- adaptateur secteur
- stockage non extensible
- ration écran / taille
- appareil photo mono capteur
- qualité d'appel
- 12 mois de garantie

Verdict

En test : l'Apple iPhone SE (2020).
En test : l'Apple iPhone SE (2020).

Avec l'iPhone SE, Apple lance un smartphone séduisant qui met en avant un processeur rapide, un excellent écran, un Wifi rapide, et des mises à jour sur le long terme. Il est en plus étanche à l'eau et intègre la charge sans-fil.

L'iPhone SE (2020) est actuellement l'appareil le moins cher pour entrer dans l'univers Apple.

Le plus gros point faible du smartphone est son rapport surface / écran, et son écran assez petit. Mais ceux qui viennent des iPhone 6, 7 et 8 ou de la première génération de SE n'en seront pas gênés - et c'est exactement la cible de l'iPhone SE2. En revanche, les utilisateurs Android seront vraisemblablement déçus par ces défauts, et par l'appareil photo. Pour ceux-là, l'iPhone 11 restera une option plus séduisante.

L'iPhone SE (2020) est un appareil haut de gamme bien fini. Le Google Pixel 4 est son seul vrai rival pour ceux qui voudraient un appareil Android équivalent, tout en ayant un meilleur rapport surface / écran, un écran 90 Hz, un double capteur photo, mais une moins bonne autonomie, pour un positionnement tarifaire similaire.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Apple iPhone SE 2020 - 05/15/2020 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Châssis
82%
Clavier
68 / 75 → 91%
Dispositif de pointage
89%
Connectivité
51 / 70 → 72%
Poids
93%
Autonomie
89%
Écran
90%
Performances en jeu
60 / 64 → 94%
Performances dans les applications
83 / 86 → 97%
Chauffe
88%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
71 / 90 → 79%
Appareil photo
63%
Moyenne
79%
85%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test de l'Apple iPhone SE 2020 : smartphone compact avec un processeur puissant
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-06-20 (Update: 2020-06-20)