Notebookcheck

Test de l'Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 (i7-10875H, RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, FHD, 300 Hz) : PC portable de jeu énorme et fin avec dalle 300 Hz

17 pouces, joueur et compact. Asus cherche à combiner ces caractéristiques dans le Zephyrus S17. Avec la RTX 2080 Super en Max-Q de Nvidia et un puissant Intel Core i7-10875H, les spécifications de base sont là et, avec différents trucs, le refroidissement est sensé être à la hauteur. Notre test va vérifier dans la pratique si ce concept fonctionne.
Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduit par Prévots),
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Processeur
Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q - 8192 Mo, Processeur: 735 MHz, Mémoire: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, NVIDIA 442.80, Intel UHD Graphis 630
Mémoire
32768 Mo 
, DDR4-3200 double canal
Écran
17.3 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPP, Sharp SHP14DC, IPS, G-Sync, brillant: non, 300 Hz
Carte mère
Intel HM470
Disque dur
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, 1024 Go 
, 890 Go libres
Carte son
Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS
Connexions
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: prise jack
Réseau
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 18.7 x 399 x 272
Batterie
76 Wh Lithium-Ion
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: 2 haut-parleurs, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, adaptateur secteur 240 watts, adaptateur secteur 65 watts, Armoury Crate, GameFirst VI, GameVisual, Sonic Studio III, 24 Mois Garantie
Poids
2.62 kg, Alimentation: 615 g
Prix
3300 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Épaisseur
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
82 %
09/20
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
2.6 kg18.7 mm17.3"1920x1080
87 %
08/20
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.7 kg19.9 mm17.3"1920x1080
84 %
09/20
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.3 kg18.9 mm17.3"1920x1080
84 %
04/20
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
3 kg25.5 mm17.3"1920x1080
84 %
03/20
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.6 kg20.5 mm17.3"1920x1080
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS

Comparaison des tailles

412 mm 305 mm 25.5 mm 3 kg399.8 mm 295.5 mm 20.5 mm 2.6 kg399 mm 272 mm 18.7 mm 2.6 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.7 kg396 mm 259 mm 18.9 mm 2.3 kg
Côté gauche : entrée secteur, HDMI 2.0b, 1 USB A 3.2 Gen2, 1 USB C 3.2 Gen2 C (incl. DisplayPort 1.4), prise jack.
Côté gauche : entrée secteur, HDMI 2.0b, 1 USB A 3.2 Gen2, 1 USB C 3.2 Gen2 C (incl. DisplayPort 1.4), prise jack.
Côté droit : 2 USB A 3.2 Gen 1, 1 Thunderbolt 3 (DisplayPort 1.4, charge 3.0), verrou de sécurité Kensington.
Côté droit : 2 USB A 3.2 Gen 1, 1 Thunderbolt 3 (DisplayPort 1.4, charge 3.0), verrou de sécurité Kensington.
A l'avant : aucune connectivité.
A l'avant : aucune connectivité.
A l'arrière : aucune connectivité.
A l'arrière : aucune connectivité.
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1260 MBit/s ∼100%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (289 - 1722, n=84)
1185 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1182 (1085min - 1338max) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1177 (773min - 1353max) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1390 MBit/s ∼100%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1283 (1089min - 1413max) MBit/s ∼92% -8%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1270 (1080min - 1388max) MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=84)
1059 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
348
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
313
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
Sharp SHP14DC
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 348 cd/m² Moyenne: 310.2 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 76 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 308 cd/m²
Contraste: 906:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.49 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8, calibrated: 0.99
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6
96% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 74% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.193
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Sharp SHP14DC, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Sharp LQ173M1JW05, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
AUO_B173HAN03, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Chi Mei 173HCE, CMN175F, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
-16%
9%
-129%
-140%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
5 (2.2, 2.8)
5.6 (2.6, 3)
-12%
5 (2.2, 2.8)
-0%
16 (8, 8)
-220%
17.2 (8.8, 8.4)
-244%
Response Time Black / White *
8 (3.6, 4.4)
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
-20%
6.6 (2.6, 4)
17%
11 (6, 5)
-38%
10.8 (6, 4.8)
-35%
PWM Frequency
26320 (25)
Screen
-59%
-8%
-35%
13%
Brightness middle
308
328
6%
299.4
-3%
310
1%
384.2
25%
Brightness
310
329
6%
299
-4%
281
-9%
357
15%
Brightness Distribution
76
78
3%
84
11%
85
12%
90
18%
Black Level *
0.34
0.35
-3%
0.31
9%
0.31
9%
0.29
15%
Contrast
906
937
3%
966
7%
1000
10%
1325
46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.49
4.74
-218%
1.82
-22%
3.86
-159%
1.35
9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.97
8.99
-126%
3.91
2%
7.8
-96%
3.45
13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.99
2.12
-114%
1.59
-61%
1.42
-43%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.3
6.8
-196%
2.7
-17%
4.48
-95%
1.2
48%
Gamma
2.193 100%
2.2 100%
2.18 101%
2.5 88%
2.23 99%
CCT
6981 93%
6446 101%
6837 95%
7542 86%
6580 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
74
64.8
-12%
67.1
-9%
60
-19%
65.5
-11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96
98.6
3%
99.8
4%
93
-3%
98.5
3%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-38% / -52%
1% / -5%
-82% / -51%
-64% / -11%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 3.6 ms hausse
↘ 4.4 ms chute
L'écran montre de faibles temps de réponse, un bon écran pour jouer.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
5 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 2.2 ms hausse
↘ 2.8 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 17714 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - CPUz
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - CPUz
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - CPUz
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - CPUz
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - GPUz
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - HWInfo
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450146014701480149015001510152015301540155015601570158015901600161016201630164016501660167016801690170017101720Tooltip
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1561 (1522.36-1646.36)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1362 (1352.68-1494.38)
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1620 (1596.04-1713.21)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1123 (1105.49-1224.89)
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1640 (1625.22-1699.96)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (190 - 214, n=24)
204 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
201.96 Points ∼99%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
200 Points ∼98% -1%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
198 Points ∼97% -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
195 Points ∼96% -3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points ∼86% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 219, n=607)
161 Points ∼79% -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1754 Points ∼100% +7%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
1713 (1596.04min - 1713.21max) Points ∼98% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
1646 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1111 - 1833, n=24)
1567 Points ∼89% -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
1549 (1352.68min - 1494.38max) Points ∼88% -6%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
1225 Points ∼70% -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=611)
912 Points ∼52% -45%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 901, n=73)
392 Seconds * ∼100% -40%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
389.5 Seconds * ∼99% -39%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (280 - 386, n=16)
326 Seconds * ∼83% -16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
324 Seconds * ∼83% -15%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
281 Seconds * ∼72%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
280 Seconds * ∼71% -0%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
48397 MIPS ∼100% +8%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
44947 MIPS ∼93%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
44947 MIPS ∼93% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (33674 - 48397, n=17)
42222 MIPS ∼87% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (3034 - 75612, n=74)
36708 MIPS ∼76% -18%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
33674 MIPS ∼70% -25%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
33364 MIPS ∼69% -26%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (5232 - 5605, n=17)
5354 MIPS ∼100% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
5284 MIPS ∼99%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
5284 MIPS ∼99% 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
5245 MIPS ∼98% -1%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
5232 MIPS ∼98% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2480 - 5674, n=74)
4875 MIPS ∼91% -8%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
4585 MIPS ∼86% -13%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (461 - 511, n=18)
489 Points ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
483 Points ∼99% +5%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
478 Points ∼98% +4%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
475 Points ∼97% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
461 Points ∼94%
Average of class Gaming
  (340 - 511, n=119)
448 Points ∼92% -3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
429 Points ∼88% -7%
CPU (Multi Core)
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
4136 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
3917 Points ∼95%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
3885 Points ∼94% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (2800 - 4133, n=18)
3444 Points ∼83% -12%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
3367 Points ∼81% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1530 - 6321, n=120)
2948 Points ∼71% -25%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
2738 Points ∼66% -30%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
8363 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (6988 - 8620, n=16)
7743 Points ∼93% +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
7531 Points ∼90% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
7474 Points ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
  (3448 - 10190, n=57)
6585 Points ∼79% -12%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
5909 Points ∼71% -21%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
1307 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1233 - 1371, n=16)
1302 Points ∼100% 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
1278 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
1271 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (874 - 1401, n=57)
1217 Points ∼93% -7%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
1128 Points ∼86% -14%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.8 fps ∼100%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (10.1 - 13, n=15)
11.5 fps ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.7 - 18.9, n=73)
10 fps ∼78% -22%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
9.47 fps ∼74% -26%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
57.8 s ∼100% +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 95.8, n=50)
57.2 s ∼99% +20%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (43 - 84.3, n=16)
52.2 s ∼90% +9%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
50.2 s ∼87% +5%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
47.7 s ∼83%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
0.676 sec * ∼100% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.546 - 0.761, n=54)
0.613 sec * ∼91% -5%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.589 sec * ∼87% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.583 sec * ∼86%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (0.547 - 0.59, n=15)
0.578 sec * ∼86% +1%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
201.96 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
136.2 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.62 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1646 Points
Aide
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
9082 Points ∼100% +79%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
8560 Points ∼94% +69%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8240 Points ∼91% +63%
Average of class Gaming
  (1764 - 11245, n=287)
6468 Points ∼71% +28%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (4747 - 7296, n=4)
6074 Points ∼67% +20%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
5514 Points ∼61% +9%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5069 Points ∼56%
Productivity
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
8469 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8386 Points ∼99%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
8253 Points ∼97% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (7633 - 8386, n=4)
8106 Points ∼96% -3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
8028 Points ∼95% -4%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7749 Points ∼91% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (4175 - 9077, n=288)
7306 Points ∼86% -13%
Essentials
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
10064 Points ∼100% +10%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
9933 Points ∼99% +9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
9831 Points ∼98% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (9118 - 9599, n=4)
9290 Points ∼92% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9140 Points ∼91%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8827 Points ∼88% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (4892 - 11266, n=289)
8753 Points ∼87% -4%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6370 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
6317 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
6191 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (5682 - 6370, n=3)
6131 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5949 Points ∼93% -7%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
5818 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6825, n=448)
5117 Points ∼80% -20%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5539 Points ∼100% +19%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
5217 Points ∼94% +12%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
4780 Points ∼86% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4666 Points ∼84%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (4375 - 4666, n=3)
4569 Points ∼82% -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
4384 Points ∼79% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=465)
4295 Points ∼78% -8%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4666 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6370 points
Aide
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
1029.5 μs * ∼100% -127%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
453 μs * ∼44%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
364 μs * ∼35% +20%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Lite-On CA5-8D512
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
9%
18%
1%
4%
7%
Write 4K
120
119
-1%
177.9
48%
101.2
-16%
110.6
-8%
142 (118 - 173, n=11)
18%
Read 4K
45.24
51.87
15%
47.42
5%
44.61
-1%
41.46
-8%
47.7 (43.7 - 51.9, n=11)
5%
Write Seq
2090
2258
8%
2707
30%
2295
10%
2378
14%
1897 (1067 - 2854, n=10)
-9%
Read Seq
2246
2283
2%
2369
5%
2174
-3%
2114
-6%
1803 (973 - 2359, n=10)
-20%
Write 4K Q32T1
392.5
491
25%
427.8
9%
401.2
2%
445.4
13%
449 (268 - 576, n=11)
14%
Read 4K Q32T1
348.4
539.7
55%
543.2
56%
475.5
36%
509.3
46%
498 (348 - 655, n=11)
43%
Write Seq Q32T1
3015
2253
-25%
2703
-10%
2397.2
-20%
2735
-9%
3000 (2936 - 3033, n=11)
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
3445
3172
-8%
3387
-2%
3336.8
-3%
3206
-7%
3475 (3195 - 3568, n=11)
1%
AS SSD
-60%
-13%
9%
-27%
13%
Score Total
4283
2392
-44%
3366
-21%
4630
8%
3624
-15%
4780 (3309 - 5810, n=11)
12%
Score Write
2170
1034
-52%
1343
-38%
2034
-6%
1447
-33%
2041 (1471 - 2327, n=11)
-6%
Score Read
1439
913
-37%
1328
-8%
1729
20%
1437
0%
1814 (1154 - 2339, n=11)
26%
Access Time Write *
0.034
0.167
-391%
0.071
-109%
0.039
-15%
0.107
-215%
0.0366 (0.024 - 0.086, n=11)
-8%
Access Time Read *
0.064
0.058
9%
0.076
-19%
0.05
22%
0.051
20%
0.0521 (0.032 - 0.087, n=11)
19%
4K-64 Write
1925.76
812.64
-58%
938.15
-51%
1697.03
-12%
1137.27
-41%
1692 (1074 - 1926, n=11)
-12%
4K-64 Read
1117.55
664.71
-41%
1049.71
-6%
1405.89
26%
1217.48
9%
1520 (878 - 2011, n=11)
36%
4K Write
109.08
90.18
-17%
157.4
44%
94.81
-13%
100.83
-8%
125 (88.2 - 156, n=11)
15%
4K Read
47.24
46.61
-1%
45.46
-4%
42.77
-9%
25.88
-45%
52.9 (45.5 - 61.4, n=11)
12%
Seq Write
1350.94
1314.33
-3%
2479.16
84%
2424
79%
2093.64
55%
2244 (1351 - 2649, n=11)
66%
Seq Read
2743.71
2019.26
-26%
2326.96
-15%
2800
2%
1937.52
-29%
2411 (1950 - 2744, n=11)
-12%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-26% / -31%
3% / -0%
5% / 6%
-12% / -14%
10% / 11%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3445 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3015 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 348.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 392.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2246 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2090 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.24 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 120 MB/s

Constant Performance Reads: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320133013401350136013701380139014001410142014301440145014601470148014901500151015201530154015501560157015801590160016101620163016401650166016701680169017001710172017301740175017601770178017901800181018201830184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010202020302040205020602070208020902100211021202130214021502160217021802190220022102220223022402250226022702280229023002310232023302340235023602370238023902400241024202430244024502460247024802490250025102520253025402550256025702580259026002610262026302640265026602670268026902700271027202730274027502760277027802790280028102820283028402850286028702880289029002910292029302940295029602970298029903000301030203030304030503060307030803090310031103120313031403150316031703180319032003210322032303240325032603270328032903300331033203330334033503360337033803390340034103420343034403450346034703480Tooltip
: Ø3436 (3311.7-3472.46)
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
32995 Points ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (26292 - 32995, n=9)
29497 Points ∼89% -11%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
29220 Points ∼89% -11%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
27694 Points ∼84% -16%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
27203 Points ∼82% -18%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
24066 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=704)
14581 Points ∼44% -56%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
8906 Points ∼100%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8479 Points ∼95% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (7372 - 8979, n=10)
8179 Points ∼92% -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
8065 Points ∼91% -9%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7597 Points ∼85% -15%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
7057 Points ∼79% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=240)
5961 Points ∼67% -33%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
23649 Points ∼100%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
22391 Points ∼95% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (19655 - 23649, n=9)
21644 Points ∼92% -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21191 Points ∼90% -10%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
18877 Points ∼80% -20%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18517 Points ∼78% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=627)
12145 Points ∼51% -49%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
134255 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
128974 Points ∼96%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (101976 - 140750, n=7)
126108 Points ∼94% -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
124815 Points ∼93% -3%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
121539 Points ∼91% -6%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
114826 Points ∼86% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=604)
71492 Points ∼53% -45%
3DMark 11 Performance
25058 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
45467 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
19929 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
8883 points
Aide
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (74.3 - 96, n=10)
85 fps ∼100% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
82.6 (69min) fps ∼97%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
81 (72min - 91max) fps ∼95% -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
80.9 (75min - 90max) fps ∼95% -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
78 fps ∼92% -6%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
67.5 (61min - 75max) fps ∼79% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=403)
53.2 fps ∼63% -36%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
85.3 fps ∼100% +3%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
83.7 fps ∼98% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
82.8 fps ∼97%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
81.6 fps ∼96% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (76.8 - 84.3, n=5)
80.8 fps ∼95% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.2 - 93.8, n=79)
69.5 fps ∼81% -16%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
126 (108.2min) fps ∼100% +7%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
126 (109.8min) fps ∼100% +7%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
119.6 (103.2min) fps ∼95% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (115 - 125, n=5)
118 fps ∼94% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
117.7 (102.5min) fps ∼93%
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 134, n=76)
105 fps ∼83% -11%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
135 (117.7min) fps ∼100% +9%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
133 (116min) fps ∼99% +7%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
126.4 (110.3min) fps ∼94% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (117 - 139, n=5)
125 fps ∼93% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
124.2 (108min) fps ∼92%
Average of class Gaming
  (15.3 - 148, n=73)
111 fps ∼82% -11%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
101 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (91 - 102, n=3)
98 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (10 - 113, n=55)
72.3 fps ∼72% -28%
Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
177.68 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (140 - 178, n=8)
156 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (93.3 - 191, n=25)
139 fps ∼78% -22%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (67 - 80.8, n=2)
73.9 fps ∼100% +10%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
66.99 fps ∼91%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.8 - 108, n=54)
55.4 fps ∼75% -17%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø83.3 (73-88)
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 82.6 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 146.6 135.8 124.2 117.7 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 66.99 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 114 97.6 82.8 fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 101 fps
Doom Eternal (2020) 177.68 fps

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
32 / 35 / 43 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
44 / 45 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.334.633.230.525.335.12537.535.733.630.935.9343136.234.829.926.334.226.24036.339.136.534.434.944.75039.635.734.731.331.537.56334.536.233.125.52534.88028.825.627.725.222.127.610024.62321.321.522.624.112528.623.425.418.717.928.21603226.628.32720.429.720030.129.830.523.315.829.72503021.625.419.613.928.33153021.425.72113.429.74003224.628.320.812.430.950030.924.827.720.612.330.363030.82227.619.911.130.280031.52329.922.410.931.6100031.622.62921.711.231.4125033.524.731.622.113.433.3160034.424.433.52111.734.3200035.424.833.621.311.835.4250035.324.533.820.912.334.8315036.224.934.820.712.735.5400033.620.831.31912.433.2500032.517.929.415.212.832.5630029.316.327.814.112.928.8800025.615.223.913.412.924.31000022.216.819.81412.819.51250020.215.617.713.912.716.81600018.313.514.513.41214.8SPL45.23543.432.124.644.8N52.24.21.60.64.8median 30.9median 23median 28.3median 20.7median 12.7median 30.2Delta2.52.73.12.51.73.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
 56 °C57 °C54 °C 
 49 °C52 °C46 °C 
 39 °C38 °C36 °C 
Maximum: 57 °C
Moyenne: 47.4 °C
50 °C50 °C51 °C
49 °C49 °C50 °C
42 °C43 °C42 °C
Maximum: 51 °C
Moyenne: 47.3 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  54 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 24 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.4 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 42.6 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-11.2 °C / -20.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2025.330.12535.932.43134.233.34034.935.85031.536.7632533.58022.129.210022.63912517.958.516020.46420015.865.225013.967.331513.466.540012.469.550012.368.563011.172.180010.970.2100011.269.6125013.471160011.772.3200011.872.5250012.374315012.772400012.468.6500012.868.9630012.966.4800012.959.61000012.859.11250012.756.4160001250.9SPL24.682.5N0.656.8median 12.7median 68.5Delta1.75.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.6 / 2.2 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 10 / 16 / 29 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 143 / 205 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-25%
-26%
-18%
-75%
-6%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
10
19.6
-96%
19.2
-92%
15.7
-57%
24.7
-147%
13.5 (10 - 23, n=7)
-35%
18.8 (1.9 - 113, n=784)
-88%
Idle Average *
16
21.7
-36%
22.4
-40%
26.3
-64%
35.9
-124%
17.9 (13.1 - 30, n=7)
-12%
24.2 (6 - 119, n=784)
-51%
Idle Maximum *
29
36.1
-24%
34.7
-20%
28
3%
69.6
-140%
28.3 (15.8 - 42, n=7)
2%
29.8 (8.3 - 122, n=784)
-3%
Load Average *
143
115.6
19%
106.7
25%
136
5%
141.8
1%
125 (94.8 - 156, n=7)
13%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=775)
27%
Witcher 3 ultra *
146
157
-8%
160.5
-10%
160
-10%
185.8
-27%
Load Maximum *
205
219.9
-7%
248.7
-21%
177
14%
235.4
-15%
203 (169 - 211, n=7)
1%
175 (21.9 - 590, n=774)
15%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
3h 28min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
2h 50min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
1h 28min
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 76 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Autonomie de la batterie
74%
132%
-1%
37%
41%
Reader / Idle
208
513
147%
229
10%
426
105%
361 (39 - 1174, n=726)
74%
WiFi v1.3
170
296
74%
295
74%
178
5%
290
71%
267 (62 - 622, n=440)
57%
Load
88
243
176%
73
-17%
31
-65%
79.7 (18 - 243, n=694)
-9%

Points positifs

+ performances de jeu
+ taux d'image, même en mode silencieux
+ écran 300 Hz
+ refroidissement

Points négatifs

- absence de lecteur de carte
- absence de LAN Gigabit
- taille du touchpad

Verdict - PC portable de jeu moderne avec des performances à revendre

En test : l'Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS. Modèle de test fourni par Asus Allemagne.
En test : l'Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS. Modèle de test fourni par Asus Allemagne.

Après l'achat du Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS, les utilisateurs n'auront pas à s'inquiéter pour longtemps des performances de leur PC portable. Il suffira totalement pour les jeux actuels, permettant même de les faire tourner en mode silencieux bien moins bruyant, avec des ventilateurs ne ressemblant pas à une salle des machines. A notre avis, le système de refroidissement conçu par Asus fonctionne bien, et nous n'avons pas été gênés au quotidien par le repositionnement du clavier. Cependant la légère ouverture du dessous du châssis quand l'écran est ouvert crée une impression d'instabilité, qui pousse à vouloir utiliser le Zephyrus S17 sur une surface plane.

L'Asus Zephyurs S17 offre une puissance impressionnante, qui peut être maintenue sur des longues périodes, grâce au système de refroidissement réussi.

Cependant, ceux qui voudraient exploiter au maximum les performances de leur Asus Zephyrus S17 activeront tôt ou tard le mode "Turbo". Surtout avec des usages 4K ou de réalité virtuelle, l'appareil sera bien plus sollicité qu'avec le jeu Full HD que nous avons testé ici. Nous nous inquiétons moins de la stabilité des performances que du niveau sonore... Lorsque les ventilateurs s'activent à plein, rien n'est possible sans écouteurs. Mais vu que cela n'a rien d'étonnant pour un PC portable de jeu, on peut dire que l'Asus Zephyrus S17 laisse une bonne impression générale.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS - 08/16/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Châssis
80 / 98 → 81%
Clavier
77%
Dispositif de pointage
69%
Connectivité
61 / 80 → 76%
Poids
59 / 10-66 → 88%
Autonomie
51 / 95 → 54%
Écran
87%
Performances en jeu
96%
Performances dans les applications
92%
Chauffe
75 / 95 → 79%
Nuisance sonore
66 / 90 → 73%
Audio
89%
Moyenne
69%
82%
Gaming - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test de l'Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 (i7-10875H, RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, FHD, 300 Hz) : PC portable de jeu énorme et fin avec dalle 300 Hz
Mike Wobker, 2020-09-16 (Update: 2020-09-16)