Notebookcheck

Test du Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G : un smartphone 5G avec écran 120 Hz à petit prix

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduit par Prévots), 03/02/2020

Ultra fluide. Pour se démarquer, le Redmi K30, vendu sous le nom de POCO X2 en Inde, compte sur des fonctionnalités haut de gammes comme la 5G, l’écran 120 Hz ou le nouveau capteur photo Sony IMX686. Son prix ne débute cependant qu’aux alentours de 250 €, battant même bon nombre de smartphones du milieu de gammes récents. Mais l’appareil a ses défauts…

Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Redmi K Gamme)
Processeur
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
Carte graphique
Qualcomm Adreno 620
Mémoire
8192 Mo 
Écran
6.67 pouces 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPP, capacitif, LCD IPS, brillant: oui, HDR, 120 Hz
Disque dur
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 Go 
, 107 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, boussole, gyroscope, capteur de proximité, OTG, Miracast
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G : N41 / N78; 4G : FDD-LTE : B1 / B3 / B5 / B8; TDD-LTE : B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 ; 3G : WCDMA 850 / 1 900 / 2 100 MHz ; 2G : GSM 850 / 900 / 1 800 / 1 900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.79 x 165.3 x 76.6
Batterie
4500 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Android 10
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 64 MPix Sony IMX686 avec ouverture f/1,89, ultra-grand-angle 120° avec ouverture f/2,2 (8 MP), appareil photo macro avec ouverture f/2,4 (5 MP), appareil photo 2 MP avec ouverture f/2,4. API Camera2: niveau 3.
Appareil photo secondaire: 20 MPix 20 + 2 MP
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, adaptateur secteur modulaire 30 W, câble USB, coque, MIUI 11, 12 Mois Garantie, fanless
Poids
208 g, Alimentation: 89 g
Prix
260 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Appareils du comparatif

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Drive
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
82 %
03/20
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
208 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
79 %
01/20
realme XT
SD 712, Adreno 616
183 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.4"2340x1080
81 %
07/19
Xiaomi Mi 9T
SD 730, Adreno 618
191 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.39"2340x1080
79 %
11/19
Nokia 7.2
SD 660, Adreno 512
180 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
80 %
01/20
Samsung Galaxy A51
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.5"2400x1080
79 %
02/20
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
159 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.15"2312x1080
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G

Comparaison des tailles

165.3 mm 76.6 mm 8.79 mm 208 g159.92 mm 75.15 mm 8.25 mm 180 g158.7 mm 75.2 mm 8.6 mm 183 g158.5 mm 73.6 mm 7.9 mm 172 g156.7 mm 74.3 mm 8.8 mm 191 g152.9 mm 72.7 mm 7.4 mm 159 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
687 (min: 345, max: 697) MBit/s ∼100%
Nokia 7.2
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
344 (min: 336, max: 352) MBit/s ∼50% -50%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Adreno 618, SD 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
333 (min: 297, max: 343) MBit/s ∼48% -52%
realme XT
Adreno 616, SD 712, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
322 (min: 162, max: 367) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
298 (min: 185, max: 350) MBit/s ∼43% -57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1014, n=504)
244 MBit/s ∼36% -64%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
189 (min: 80, max: 224) MBit/s ∼28% -72%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (min: 280, max: 399) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
297 (min: 189, max: 335) MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Nokia 7.2
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
296 (min: 223, max: 308) MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Adreno 618, SD 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
293 (min: 161, max: 346) MBit/s ∼86% -14%
realme XT
Adreno 616, SD 712, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
248 (min: 105, max: 306) MBit/s ∼73% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 966, n=504)
227 MBit/s ∼67% -33%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
224 (min: 197, max: 260) MBit/s ∼66% -34%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø674 (345-697)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø341 (280-399)
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : boucle.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : boucle.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Virages.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Virages.
GPS Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G : vue générale.
GPS Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G : vue générale.
GPS Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G : boucle.
GPS Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G : boucle.
GPS Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G - Virages.
GPS Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G - Virages.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
53.8 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
28 ∆E
65.3 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
76.4 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
93 ∆E
70.6 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G: 46.91 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 92.95 ∆E
ColorChecker
10.7 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
1 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G: 5.36 ∆E min: 0.98 - max: 14.19 ∆E
Xiaomi Redmi K30 - Mire de test zoomée.
Mire de test zoomée.
Xiaomi Redmi K30 - Mire de test.
Xiaomi Redmi K30 - Mire de test à 1 lux.
640
cd/m²
664
cd/m²
649
cd/m²
615
cd/m²
658
cd/m²
661
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
639
cd/m²
634
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 664 cd/m² Moyenne: 643 cd/m² Minimum: 2.25 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 93 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 658 cd/m²
Contraste: 1343:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
LCD IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
realme XT
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Xiaomi Mi 9T
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Nokia 7.2
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Samsung Galaxy A51
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
IPS, 2312x1080, 6.15
Screen
-64%
-1%
-47%
-16%
-40%
Brightness middle
658
414
-37%
589
-10%
604
-8%
589
-10%
507
-23%
Brightness
643
414
-36%
589
-8%
593
-8%
589
-8%
481
-25%
Brightness Distribution
93
97
4%
96
3%
92
-1%
94
1%
88
-5%
Black Level *
0.49
0.4
18%
0.38
22%
Contrast
1343
1510
12%
1334
-1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.8
4.4
-144%
2.5
-39%
5.1
-183%
2.22
-23%
4.72
-162%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.4
11.2
-155%
4.9
-11%
10.3
-134%
8.24
-87%
7.84
-78%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.8
4.3
-13%
1.6
58%
6.4
-68%
2.6
32%
5.5
-45%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.31 95%
2.24 98%
2.23 99%
2.111 104%
2.158 102%
CCT
6255 104%
6532 100%
6544 99%
8149 80%
6508 100%
7596 86%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 2358 Hz ≤ 43 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 2358 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 43 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 2358 Hz est élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.

En comparaison, 50 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 17159 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
32.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 17.2 ms hausse
↘ 15.6 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (24.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
49.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 24 ms hausse
↘ 25.2 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (39.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5.1
Vulkan Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1035 Points ∼60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
1035 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 4043, n=30)
1719 Points ∼100% +66%
OpenCL Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1212 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
1212 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=28)
1706 Points ∼100% +41%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1520 Points ∼76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
1520 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (782 - 3531, n=38)
2000 Points ∼100% +32%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
569 Points ∼98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
569 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (145 - 1342, n=38)
583 Points ∼100% +2%
Geekbench 4.0
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
7997 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7755 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
7997 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (600 - 12668, n=85)
3997 Points ∼50% -50%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
7661 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6900 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
7661 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (918 - 12199, n=130)
4218 Points ∼55% -45%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3072 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2547 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
3072 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (391 - 5109, n=130)
1453 Points ∼47% -53%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9989 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
8276 Points ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7533 Points ∼75% -25%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5917 Points ∼59% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5649 Points ∼57% -43%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6042 Points ∼60% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
9989 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=438)
5517 Points ∼55% -45%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
10689 Points ∼96%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
11143 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9049 Points ∼81% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6416 Points ∼58% -40%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
7593 Points ∼68% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
10689 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=601)
6014 Points ∼54% -44%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2588 Points ∼93%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2069 Points ∼74% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2786 Points ∼100% +8%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2207 Points ∼79% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2161 Points ∼78% -16%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2196 Points ∼79% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
2588 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=105)
2672 Points ∼96% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3167 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1885 Points ∼60% -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1917 Points ∼61% -39%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1141 Points ∼36% -64%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1438 Points ∼45% -55%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
796 Points ∼25% -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
3167 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=105)
2795 Points ∼88% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2978 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1923 Points ∼65% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2060 Points ∼69% -31%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1278 Points ∼43% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1554 Points ∼52% -48%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
927 Points ∼31% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
2978 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=105)
2532 Points ∼85% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2965 Points ∼91%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1982 Points ∼61% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3241 Points ∼100% +9%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2693 Points ∼83% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2311 Points ∼71% -22%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2092 Points ∼65% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
2965 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=444)
2043 Points ∼63% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3554 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2147 Points ∼60% -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2176 Points ∼61% -39%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1256 Points ∼35% -65%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1530 Points ∼43% -57%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
838 Points ∼24% -76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
3554 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9345, n=444)
1882 Points ∼53% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3412 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2108 Points ∼62% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2347 Points ∼69% -31%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1425 Points ∼42% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1654 Points ∼48% -52%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
967 Points ∼28% -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
3412 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 7982, n=445)
1748 Points ∼51% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3198 Points ∼97%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1946 Points ∼59% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3296 Points ∼100% +3%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2640 Points ∼80% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2336 Points ∼71% -27%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2084 Points ∼63% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
3198 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5209, n=473)
1954 Points ∼59% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5367 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3248 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3316 Points ∼62% -38%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2007 Points ∼37% -63%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1993 Points ∼37% -63%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1261 Points ∼23% -77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
5367 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=473)
2498 Points ∼47% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4643 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2828 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3312 Points ∼71% -29%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2120 Points ∼46% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2060 Points ∼44% -56%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1382 Points ∼30% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
4643 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=473)
2105 Points ∼45% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3256 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2617 Points ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3227 Points ∼99% -1%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2649 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2217 Points ∼68% -32%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2207 Points ∼68% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
3256 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4909, n=524)
1946 Points ∼60% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3287 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1928 Points ∼59% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2008 Points ∼61% -39%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1181 Points ∼36% -64%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1473 Points ∼45% -55%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
730 Points ∼22% -78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
3287 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=524)
1571 Points ∼48% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3277 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2048 Points ∼62% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2192 Points ∼67% -33%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1347 Points ∼41% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1592 Points ∼49% -51%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
858 Points ∼26% -74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
3277 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7012, n=525)
1504 Points ∼46% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3432 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2619 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3239 Points ∼94% -6%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2632 Points ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2225 Points ∼65% -35%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2179 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
3432 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=565)
1814 Points ∼53% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5115 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3100 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3184 Points ∼62% -38%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1913 Points ∼37% -63%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2027 Points ∼40% -60%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
870 Points ∼17% -83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
5115 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11488, n=564)
2053 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4654 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2978 Points ∼64% -36%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3196 Points ∼69% -31%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2037 Points ∼44% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2068 Points ∼44% -56%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1004 Points ∼22% -78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
4654 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8866, n=567)
1774 Points ∼38% -62%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23203 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13698 Points ∼59% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
19433 Points ∼84% -16%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
18094 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
20393 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
23203 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=715)
14596 Points ∼63% -37%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
68634 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
37657 Points ∼55% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
46605 Points ∼68% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
28898 Points ∼42% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
25086 Points ∼37% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
68634 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=713)
23210 Points ∼34% -66%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
47824 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
27117 Points ∼57% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
35557 Points ∼74% -26%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
25513 Points ∼53% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23866 Points ∼50% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
47824 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=713)
18684 Points ∼39% -61%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
95 fps ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
74 fps ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
77 fps ∼81% -19%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
50 fps ∼53% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
46 fps ∼48% -52%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
33 fps ∼35% -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
95 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=732)
40.1 fps ∼42% -58%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
86 fps ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
58 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
58 fps ∼67% -33%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
46 fps ∼53% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
40 fps ∼47% -53%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
31 fps ∼36% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
86 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=741)
29 fps ∼34% -66%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
54 fps ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
36 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼70% -30%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
23 fps ∼43% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
24 fps ∼44% -56%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
18 fps ∼33% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
54 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=636)
23.3 fps ∼43% -57%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
48 fps ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
33 fps ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼71% -29%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
21 fps ∼44% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼48% -52%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
16 fps ∼33% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
48 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=645)
20.2 fps ∼42% -58%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
37 fps ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
26 fps ∼70% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼73% -27%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
15 fps ∼41% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
15 fps ∼41% -59%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
12 fps ∼32% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
37 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=501)
18.9 fps ∼51% -49%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
33 fps ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
23 fps ∼70% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
24 fps ∼73% -27%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
13 fps ∼39% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼42% -58%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
11 fps ∼33% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
33 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=503)
17.5 fps ∼53% -47%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.9 fps ∼88%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
9 fps ∼89% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9.3 fps ∼92% +4%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
4.9 fps ∼49% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.5 fps ∼54% -38%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
4.2 fps ∼42% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
8.9 fps ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=236)
10.1 fps ∼100% +13%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5.9 fps ∼45% -55%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6.1 fps ∼47% -53%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
3.2 fps ∼25% -75%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼27% -73%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2.6 fps ∼20% -80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
13 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 39, n=234)
7.1 fps ∼55% -45%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼71% -29%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
7.7 fps ∼37% -63%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.1 fps ∼43% -57%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.4 fps ∼30% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
21 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=240)
15 fps ∼71% -29%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23 fps ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
16 fps ∼70% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼70% -30%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.7 fps ∼38% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼43% -57%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.9 fps ∼30% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
23 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=240)
16.7 fps ∼73% -27%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
15 fps ∼71% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼76% -24%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
9 fps ∼43% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼48% -52%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.4 fps ∼30% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
21 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=426)
12.8 fps ∼61% -39%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
19 fps ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13 fps ∼68% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.2 fps ∼43% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.6 fps ∼45% -55%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
7.3 fps ∼38% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
19 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=430)
11.4 fps ∼60% -40%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23.1 (min: 11.15, max: 38.98) fps ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16.91 fps ∼57% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
23.1 fps ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.24 - 773, n=72)
29.9 fps ∼100% +29%
Vulkan Medium Native (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
fps ∼0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13.56 fps ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=63)
16.1 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21.97 (min: 12.98, max: 44.43) fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15.51 fps ∼71% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
22 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=61)
20.1 fps ∼91% -9%
VRMark - Amber Room (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3258 Score ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2000 Score ∼61% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
3258 Score ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 5025, n=69)
2430 Score ∼75% -25%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1378 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1004 Points ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1099 Points ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
998 Points ∼72% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
1378 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=668)
778 Points ∼56% -44%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5087 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3031 Points ∼60% -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3559 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2168 Points ∼43% -57%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1466 Points ∼29% -71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
5087 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=668)
2206 Points ∼43% -57%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5278 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3026 Points ∼57% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
4646 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1605 Points ∼30% -70%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2993 Points ∼57% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
5278 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=668)
1619 Points ∼31% -69%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6870 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5198 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6760 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4738 Points ∼69% -31%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
4909 Points ∼71% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
6870 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=668)
3145 Points ∼46% -54%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3990 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2630 Points ∼66% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3329 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
634 Points ∼16% -84%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2153 Points ∼54% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
3990 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=668)
1580 Points ∼40% -60%
AnTuTu v8
UX (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
56728 Points ∼94%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
38440 Points ∼63% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
26647 Points ∼44% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
38475 Points ∼63% -32%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
60649 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
56728 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6969 - 110361, n=53)
46667 Points ∼77% -18%
MEM (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
60481 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
41759 Points ∼69% -31%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
32883 Points ∼54% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
43405 Points ∼72% -28%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
35479 Points ∼59% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
60481 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (16319 - 100390, n=53)
50474 Points ∼83% -17%
GPU (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
93039 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
61715 Points ∼66% -34%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
35936 Points ∼39% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36821 Points ∼40% -60%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
28697 Points ∼31% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
93039 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5938 - 214615, n=53)
89526 Points ∼96% -4%
CPU (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
86677 Points ∼91%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
76522 Points ∼81% -12%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
62411 Points ∼66% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
62594 Points ∼66% -28%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
60900 Points ∼64% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
86677 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40620 - 178616, n=53)
94932 Points ∼100% +10%
Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
298925 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
218436 Points ∼73% -27%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
157877 Points ∼53% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
181295 Points ∼61% -39%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
185725 Points ∼62% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
298925 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (84645 - 599843, n=53)
281636 Points ∼94% -6%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8591 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7795 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
8591 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=338)
4773 Points ∼56% -44%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6213 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6871 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
6213 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13279, n=398)
4834 Points ∼70% -22%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2689 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2527 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
2689 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=398)
1467 Points ∼55% -45%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
53.145 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
53.1 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
47.131 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=133)
37.1 Points ∼70% -30%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
31.333 Points ∼59% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
27.681 Points ∼52% -48%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
94.8 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
94.778 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
87.488 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
51.257 Points ∼54% -46%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
50.919 Points ∼54% -46%
realme XT (Chrome 79)
50.163 Points ∼53% -47%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=564)
43.6 Points ∼46% -54%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
54.9 runs/min ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
54.9 runs/min ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
46.46 runs/min ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=121)
40.6 runs/min ∼74% -26%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
31.4 runs/min ∼57% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
29.1 runs/min ∼53% -47%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
86 Points ∼100% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
80 Points ∼93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
80 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=196)
67.6 Points ∼79% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
57 Points ∼66% -29%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
52 Points ∼60% -35%
realme XT (Chrome 79)
47 Points ∼55% -41%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
18809 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
18809 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
17501 Points ∼93% -7%
realme XT (Chrome 79)
10328 Points ∼55% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
10194 Points ∼54% -46%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
9549 Points ∼51% -49%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=725)
7128 Points ∼38% -62%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=750)
10258 ms * ∼100% -268%
realme XT (Chrome 79)
4382.8 ms * ∼43% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
4375.1 ms * ∼43% -57%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
4317.8 ms * ∼42% -55%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
2787 ms * ∼27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
2787 ms * ∼27% -0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
2563.9 ms * ∼25% +8%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Xiaomi Redmi K30 5Grealme XTXiaomi Mi 9TNokia 7.2Samsung Galaxy A51Huawei P30 Lite New EditionAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-37%
-12%
-55%
-17%
48%
-4%
-64%
Random Write 4KB
100.99
25
-75%
107.82
7%
13.38
-87%
104.4
3%
171.6
70%
90.8 (18.2 - 250, n=45)
-10%
26.1 (0.14 - 259, n=802)
-74%
Random Read 4KB
96.8
112.46
16%
128.65
33%
79.64
-18%
110.8
14%
198.7
105%
138 (96.8 - 161, n=45)
43%
51.3 (1.59 - 226, n=802)
-47%
Sequential Write 256KB
312.76
173.74
-44%
179.19
-43%
161.4
-48%
184.9
-41%
391.1
25%
213 (182 - 503, n=45)
-32%
107 (2.99 - 729, n=802)
-66%
Sequential Read 256KB
889.67
483.79
-46%
492.74
-45%
290.83
-67%
496.1
-44%
800.3
-10%
759 (427 - 912, n=45)
-15%
295 (12.1 - 1781, n=802)
-67%
PUBG Mobile
01020304050Tooltip
; Balanced: Ø39.9 (35-41)
; HD: Ø29.9 (29-31)
Asphalt 9: Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø29.9 (27-31)
; Standard / low: Ø29.5 (23-31)
Dead Trigger 2
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
: Ø120 (116-120)
 33.1 °C32.8 °C33.6 °C 
 32.7 °C32.4 °C34 °C 
 31.4 °C30.9 °C32.5 °C 
Maximum: 34 °C
Moyenne: 32.6 °C
30.2 °C31.8 °C33.2 °C
29.2 °C31.2 °C32.5 °C
28.9 °C30.6 °C31.2 °C
Maximum: 33.2 °C
Moyenne: 31 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  26.2 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260 / Fluke t3000 FC
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.2292524.428.93127.324.84022.723.2503333.56326.7268023.426.41002125.512517.62816018.245.520014.744.52501549.83151653.740015.756.350014.461.663014.362.580014.269100014.272.5125013.874.2160014.974.8200014.574.9250014.675.2315014.374.8400014.476500014.976.4630014.473.8800014.673100001573.81250015.167.51600015.557SPL26.785.9N0.863.8median 14.7median 69Delta0.611.229.829.125.229.521.629.424.724.129.627.122.524.325.121.120.125.819.938.520.849.417.651.717.655.317.458.516.159.913.963.814.566.216.167.214.572.414.473.513.675.313.976.214.578.114.47814.876.114.779.114.878.314.977.215.176.11566.215.155.126.9880.972median 14.9median 67.21.511.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi K30 5Grealme XT
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

realme XT audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.09 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.66 / 2.37 / 2.42 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 6.8 / 7.5 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
4500 mAh
realme XT
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T
4000 mAh
Nokia 7.2
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
3340 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
38%
44%
1%
11%
1%
0%
14%
Idle Minimum *
0.66
0.55
17%
0.54
18%
0.77
-17%
0.9
-36%
0.95
-44%
0.66
-0%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=818)
-33%
Idle Average *
2.37
1.39
41%
0.95
60%
2.32
2%
1.7
28%
2.1
11%
2.37
-0%
1.741 (0.6 - 6.2, n=817)
27%
Idle Maximum *
2.42
1.44
40%
1.08
55%
2.41
-0%
1.8
26%
2.4
1%
2.42
-0%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=818)
16%
Load Average *
6.8
2.97
56%
2.7
60%
4.44
35%
5.2
24%
4.2
38%
6.8
-0%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=812)
40%
Load Maximum *
7.5
4.92
34%
5.4
28%
8.79
-17%
6.6
12%
7.7
-3%
7.5
-0%
5.99 (1.2 - 14.2, n=812)
20%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
34h 43min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 22min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
12h 14min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
4h 03min
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
4500 mAh
realme XT
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T
4000 mAh
Nokia 7.2
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
3340 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
-10%
25%
-29%
1%
-11%
Reader / Idle
2083
2138
3%
1689
-19%
1359
-35%
H.264
734
1208
65%
846
15%
802
9%
WiFi v1.3
802
718
-10%
991
24%
570
-29%
698
-13%
719
-10%
Load
243
258
6%
289
19%
223
-8%

Points positifs

+ luminosité de l'écran IPS
+ taux de rafraîchissement de 120 Hz
+ précision du GPS
+ rapidité du stockage UFS
+ températures externes
+ connectivité 5G
+ SoC
+ adaptateur secteur 30 W
+ appareil photo principal...

Points négatifs

- ...avec des faiblesses en basse luminosité
- zoom
- MLI
- dalle LCD (halos, contraste)
- haut-parleur mono
- restrictions liées à l'import (logiciel, garantie, LTE bande 20)
- absence de charge sans-fil

Verdict

En test : le Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Trading Shenzhen.
En test : le Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Trading Shenzhen.

Non seulement le Redmi K30 est élégant, mais il est également incroyablement bien équipé, pour un prix d’environ 300 €. La connectivité 5G et la dalle 120 Hz, par exemple, étaient jusqu’à maintenant l’apanage des flagships. Le nouveau capteur Sony IMX686 est également efficace de jour, et fixe de nouveaux standards photos pour les smartphones du milieu de gamme. Et le nouveau SoC Qualcomm est assez performant pour les jeux actuels.

Si Xiaomi commence à vendre un équivalent européen du Redmi K30 5G, alors ce serait un choix difficile à éviter, pour les 300 € qu’il coûterait.

Alors que le Redmi K30 5G a beaucoup d’arguments, nous avons quand même détecté quelques problèmes avec notre appareil. Ignorer les limitations d’un smartphone chinois en Europe serait une erreur, et le Redmi K30 ne possède pas les avantages des écrans OLED. En pratique, cela signifie que le Redmi K30 possède un contraste en berne, et le halo typique des écrans IPS. La dalle utilise la MLI, mais ici comme la plupart des écrans OLED. Notre micro n’est pas non plus convaincant – un deuxième modèle de test confirmera ou non s’il s’agit d’un problème isolé ou de quelque chose de plus général. Dans l’ensemble, le Redmi K30 5G est un excellent smartphone du milieu de gamme, et nous espérons qu’il arrive bientôt en Europe.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G - 02/17/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Châssis
88%
Clavier
67 / 75 → 89%
Dispositif de pointage
91%
Connectivité
50 / 70 → 72%
Poids
88%
Autonomie
89%
Écran
88%
Performances en jeu
36 / 64 → 56%
Performances dans les applications
76 / 86 → 88%
Chauffe
93%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Appareil photo
61%
Moyenne
77%
82%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G : un smartphone 5G avec écran 120 Hz à petit prix
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-03- 2 (Update: 2020-03- 2)