Test du Dell G5 15 5590 (i7-9750H, RTX 2070 Max-Q, FHD 144 Hz) : jeu en 15 pouces avec carte graphique Max-Q
Note | Date | Modèle | Poids | Épaisseur | Taille | Résolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83 % | 11/19 | Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.8 kg | 23.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84 % | 08/19 | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84 % | 06/19 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82 % | 09/19 | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.4 kg | 19.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81 % | 06/19 | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.1 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Top 10
» Le Top 10 des PC portables multimédia
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu légers
» Le Top 10 des ordinateurs portables bureautiques
» Le Top 10 des PC portables bureautiques premium/professionnels
» Le Top 10 des Stations de travail mobiles
» Le Top 10 des Ultraportables
» Le Top 10 des Ultrabooks
» Le Top 10 des Convertibles
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes Windows
» Le Top 10 des Smartphones
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 300 euros
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 500 euros
» Le Top 25 des meilleurs écrans d'ordinateurs
SDCardreader Transfer Speed | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (11.7 - 218, n=307) | |
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (13.4 - 257, n=305) | |
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Average of class Gaming (141 - 1670, n=365) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ | |
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Average of class Gaming (144 - 1645, n=365) | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ |
|
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 83 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 291 cd/m²
Contraste: 1323:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.95 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 2.05
ΔE Greyscale 3.82 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), IPS, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 1920x1080 | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 40% | 10% | 12% | 44% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16.4 (8.4, 8) | 5.2 (2.6, 2.6) 68% | 15.2 (7.6, 7.6) 7% | 15.2 (7.6, 7.6) 7% | 7.2 (3.8, 3.4) 56% |
Response Time Black / White * | 12.8 (7.6, 5.2) | 11.2 (6.8, 4.4) 12% | 11.2 (6.8, 4.4) 12% | 10.8 (6, 4.8) 16% | 8.8 (4.4, 4.4) 31% |
PWM Frequency | 23580 (24) | ||||
Screen | 6% | 3% | -12% | 1% | |
Brightness middle | 291 | 288 -1% | 266 -9% | 324.8 12% | 286 -2% |
Brightness | 295 | 265 -10% | 248 -16% | 316 7% | 275 -7% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 84 1% | 89 7% | 84 1% | 90 8% |
Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.22 -0% | 0.31 -41% | 0.26 -18% | 0.37 -68% |
Contrast | 1323 | 1309 -1% | 858 -35% | 1249 -6% | 773 -42% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 3.95 | 3.22 18% | 2.78 30% | 4.96 -26% | 2.19 45% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 7.46 | 6.26 16% | 5.96 20% | 8.95 -20% | 4.4 41% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 2.05 | 1.5 27% | 0.91 56% | 3.23 -58% | 2.27 -11% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 3.82 | 3.43 10% | 3.58 6% | 5 -31% | 2.2 42% |
Gamma | 2.49 88% | 2.41 91% | 2.46 89% | 2.21 100% | 2.41 91% |
CCT | 7317 89% | 7290 89% | 7186 90% | 7742 84% | 6405 101% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 60 2% | 62 5% | 59.8 1% | 59 0% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91 | 93 2% | 96 5% | 91.8 1% | 91 0% |
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres) | 23% /
11% | 7% /
4% | 0% /
-9% | 23% /
7% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Temps de réponse de l'écran
↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc | ||
---|---|---|
12.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 7.6 ms hausse | |
↘ 5.2 ms chute | ||
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés. | ||
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80% | ||
16.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 8.4 ms hausse | |
↘ 8 ms chute | ||
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.7 ms) de tous les appareils testés. |
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé | |||
En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9725 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active. |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ | |
Average of class Gaming (312 - 524, n=148) | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (1397 - 6321, n=149) | |
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
Average of class Gaming (77 - 220, n=637) | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
Average of class Gaming (196 - 2804, n=645) |
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00 | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 92% | 76% | 105% | 71% | |
Write 4K | 64.56 | 108.8 69% | 115.5 79% | 137.4 113% | 97.04 50% |
Read 4K | 35.64 | 40.31 13% | 57.97 63% | 41.37 16% | 49.58 39% |
Write Seq | 748 | 2488 233% | 1555 108% | 2500 234% | 1838 146% |
Read Seq | 1039 | 1916 84% | 2590 149% | 1576 52% | 2421 133% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 435.7 | 382.4 -12% | 369.3 -15% | 446.7 3% | 326.9 -25% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 292.4 | 421.8 44% | 441.7 51% | 522.4 79% | 372.9 28% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 869.8 | 2542 192% | 1547 78% | 2796 221% | 1894 118% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1557 | 3320 113% | 2969 91% | 3415 119% | 2828 82% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 18202 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36724 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15046 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 6557 points | |
Aide |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (1097 - 6633, n=120) | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
Average of class Gaming (368 - 13013, n=273) | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
Average of class Gaming (385 - 40636, n=658) |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
Average of class Gaming (513 - 50983, n=734) |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
Average of class Gaming (12.6 - 115, n=426) |
Bas | Moyen | Élevé | Ultra | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 111 | 61.5 | fps | ||
Apex Legends (2019) | 106 | 105 | fps | ||
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 86 | 78 | fps | ||
Anthem (2019) | 71.9 | 67.8 | fps | ||
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 112 | 68.8 | fps | ||
Rage 2 (2019) | 74.8 | 71.5 | fps | ||
F1 2019 (2019) | 130 | 97 | fps | ||
Control (2019) | 57.4 | fps | |||
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 65.3 | 51.1 | fps | ||
FIFA 20 (2019) | 180 | 179 | fps | ||
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) | 70 | 52 | fps | ||
GRID 2019 (2019) | 92.6 | 67 | fps |
Degré de la nuisance sonore
Au repos |
| 32 / 33 / 34 dB(A) |
Disque dur |
| 32 dB(A) |
Fortement sollicité |
| 50 / 52 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silencieux 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) bruyant |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 1% | -3% | 5% | -3% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 29 3% | 30 -0% | 29 (24 - 32, n=418) 3% |
Idle Minimum * | 32 | 30 6% | 31 3% | 30.5 5% | 31 3% | 31.2 (24 - 42, n=841) 2% |
Idle Average * | 33 | 33 -0% | 34 -3% | 31.5 5% | 33 -0% | 32.5 (24.4 - 46.6, n=841) 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 34 | 39 -15% | 39 -15% | 31.5 7% | 38 -12% | 34.7 (24.4 - 57, n=841) -2% |
Load Average * | 50 | 45 10% | 46 8% | 40.6 19% | 50 -0% | 41.3 (28 - 59, n=842) 17% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50 | 49 2% | 53 -6% | 49.5 1% | 53 -6% | |
Load Maximum * | 52 | 51 2% | 55 -6% | 53.4 -3% | 56 -8% | 48.6 (38.9 - 66.6, n=842) 7% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 61 °C / 142 F, compared to the average of 42.6 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.2 °C / -7.6 F).
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -3% | -13% | -30% | -10% | -3% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 54 | 49 9% | 58 -7% | 48.8 10% | 54 -0% | 46 (28 - 68.8, n=807) 15% |
Maximum Bottom * | 61 | 59 3% | 64 -5% | 55 10% | 47 23% | 49.9 (25.9 - 78, n=805) 18% |
Idle Upper Side * | 25 | 28 -12% | 30 -20% | 41 -64% | 33 -32% | 30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=758) -23% |
Idle Bottom * | 26 | 29 -12% | 31 -19% | 45.6 -75% | 34 -31% | 31.7 (21.1 - 50.3, n=756) -22% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Éteint/en veille | ![]() ![]() |
Au repos | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fortement sollicité |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Légende:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -1% | -74% | -230% | -98% | -74% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5 | 7 -40% | 21 -320% | 46 -820% | 24 -380% | 18.7 (1.9 - 113, n=801) -274% |
Idle Average * | 13 | 12 8% | 23 -77% | 59 -354% | 27 -108% | 24.1 (6 - 119, n=801) -85% |
Idle Maximum * | 23 | 22 4% | 32 -39% | 65.5 -185% | 33 -43% | 29.7 (8.3 - 122, n=801) -29% |
Load Average * | 121 | 86 29% | 97 20% | 99.8 18% | 129 -7% | 104 (14.1 - 319, n=793) 14% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 133 | 144 -8% | 148 -11% | 154.1 -16% | 176 -32% | |
Load Maximum * | 184 | 177 4% | 213 -16% | 222.7 -21% | 216 -17% | 177 (21.9 - 590, n=792) 4% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 90 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 72 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 76 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Autonomie de la batterie | 23% | 40% | -45% | -34% | -22% | |
Reader / Idle | 513 | 666 30% | 545 6% | 221 -57% | 353 -31% | 367 (39 - 1399, n=742) -28% |
WiFi v1.3 | 344 | 478 39% | 421 22% | 129 -62% | 220 -36% | 271 (62 - 683, n=467) -21% |
Load | 95 | 96 1% | 181 91% | 80 -16% | 62 -35% | 80.1 (18 - 243, n=710) -16% |
H.264 | 408 | 278 (88 - 860, n=175) |
Points positifs
Points négatifs
À l’exception de l’autonomie, le Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW à 2 000 € est bien meilleur que le G5 15 5590-PCNJJ à 1 000 €.
En plus de meilleures performances (processeur, carte graphique, SSD, etc.) et d’un port Thunderbolt 3 en plus, le 5590-P8RVW possède un écran bien plus réactif. À la différence des versions d’entrée de gamme, l’écran 144 Hz haut de gamme possède une luminosité correcte, des couleurs fidèles, et des temps de réponse plus réduits.
Cependant, le modèle à 2 000 € possède les mêmes défauts que la version à petit prix, tels un lecteur de carte lent ou un throttling du processeur avec les logiciels 3D - ce qui empêche au portable de 15 pouces d’avoir une meilleure note.
L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW - 05/14/2020 v7
Florian Glaser