Courte critique du HP Omen X 2S 15 (i7-9750H, RTX 2070 Max-Q, FHD) : vision double
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl (Omen X 2S 15 Gamme)
Processeur
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8192 Mo, Processeur: 885 MHz, Mémoire: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 431.86
Mémoire
24576 Mo
, 16 Go DDR4-3200, 8 Go DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43 (2x SODIMM)
Écran
15.60 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPP, AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, brillant: non
Carte mère
Intel HM370
Disque dur
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00, 1024 Go
Carte son
Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller
Connexions
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm
Réseau
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 19.8 x 362.2 x 261.6
Batterie
72 Wh Lithium-Polymère, 6 cellules
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: FHD
Appareil photo primaire: 2.1 MPix
Appareil photo primaire: 2.1 MPix
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo Bang & Olufsen, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, Omen Command Center, 12 Mois Garantie
Poids
2.38 kg, Alimentation: 750 g
Prix
1900 USD
Liens
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Top 10
» Le Top 10 des PC portables multimédia
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu légers
» Le Top 10 des ordinateurs portables bureautiques
» Le Top 10 des PC portables bureautiques premium/professionnels
» Le Top 10 des Stations de travail mobiles
» Le Top 10 des Ultraportables
» Le Top 10 des Ultrabooks
» Le Top 10 des Convertibles
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes Windows
» Le Top 10 des Smartphones
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 300 euros
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 500 euros
» Le Top 25 des meilleurs écrans d'ordinateurs
| Networking | |
| iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1303ng | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1303ng | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics AUO82ED
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 337 cd/m² Moyenne: 316.1 cd/m² Minimum: 18.41 cd/m²Homogénéité de la luminosité: 84 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 324.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 1249:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.96 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6, calibrated: 3.23
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng LGD05CE, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Alienware m15 R2 P87F Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046 N156HHE-GA1, TN, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -169% | 10% | 6% | 46% | -23% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 15.2 (7.6, 7.6) | 40 (21.2, 18.8) -163% | 12.8 (6.8, 6) 16% | 16.4 (7.6, 6.8) -8% | 8.4 (4.4, 4) 45% | 18.8 (11.6, 7.2) -24% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10.8 (6, 4.8) | 29.6 (17.2, 12.4) -174% | 10.4 (6, 4.4) 4% | 8.8 (4.4, 4.4) 19% | 5.8 (4.4, 1.4) 46% | 13.2 (8, 5.2) -22% |
| PWM Frequency | 23810 (10) | 23810 (24) | 25510 (34) | |||
| Screen | -23% | 19% | -11% | 10% | 2% | |
| Brightness middle | 324.8 | 251 -23% | 293 -10% | 324.2 0% | 307.1 -5% | 320.4 -1% |
| Brightness | 316 | 232 -27% | 270 -15% | 304 -4% | 276 -13% | 298 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 76 -10% | 87 4% | 90 7% | 80 -5% | 85 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.17 35% | 0.29 -12% | 0.38 -46% | 0.37 -42% | 0.42 -62% |
| Contrast | 1249 | 1476 18% | 1010 -19% | 853 -32% | 830 -34% | 763 -39% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 4.96 | 6.2 -25% | 1.69 66% | 5.01 -1% | 2.53 49% | 3.21 35% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 8.95 | 18.6 -108% | 3.37 62% | 12.7 -42% | 4.66 48% | 5.54 38% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 3.23 | 4.8 -49% | 1.24 62% | 1.64 49% | 2.82 13% | 2.36 27% |
| Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 5 | 4.2 16% | 2.3 54% | 7.9 -58% | 1.7 66% | 3.6 28% |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.32 95% | 2.3 96% | 2.35 94% | 2.194 100% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 7742 84% | 7454 87% | 6758 96% | 8455 77% | 6893 94% | 6503 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.8 | 36.5 -39% | 63 5% | 60.8 2% | 76 27% | 59 -1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91.8 | 57.4 -37% | 98.5 7% | 95.5 4% | 100 9% | 92 0% |
| Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres) | -96% /
-45% | 15% /
17% | -3% /
-8% | 28% /
16% | -11% /
-2% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Temps de réponse de l'écran
ℹ
Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.| ↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 6 ms hausse |  |
| ↘ 4.8 ms chute | ||
| L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés. | ||
| ↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80% | ||
| 15.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 7.6 ms hausse |  |
| ↘ 7.6 ms chute | ||
| L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés. | ||
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)
ℹ
Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.| Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé |  | ||
En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9728 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 151500) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active. | |||
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø968 (959.49-1081.9)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1056 (1046.13-1175)
Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1026 (960.41-1036.48)
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø748 (730.55-769.02)
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5039 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5931 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5991 points | |
Aide | ||
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00 | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Alienware m15 R2 P87F 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046 CUK Cyclone 500GB M.2 NVMe | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -7% | -1% | -15% | -8% | -20% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1853.64 | 907.05 -51% | 976.6 -47% | 1426.35 -23% | 1164.53 -37% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 896.18 | 392.55 -56% | 496.53 -45% | 576.02 -36% | 478.19 -47% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2249.66 | 1417.66 -37% | 2082.66 -7% | 2073.16 -8% | 1872.47 -17% | |
| Score Total | 4743 | 4323 -9% | 4221 -11% | 3633 -23% | 3040 -36% | 3230 -32% |
| Score Write | 1951 | 1901 -3% | 2102 8% | 1481 -24% | 902 -54% | 1752 -10% |
| Score Read | 1840 | 1619 -12% | 1394 -24% | 1407 -24% | 1433 -22% | 985 -46% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.102 | 0.032 69% | 0.034 67% | 0.108 -6% | 0.042 59% | 0.043 58% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.046 | 0.084 -83% | 0.05 -9% | 0.065 -41% | 0.05 -9% | 0.077 -67% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1592.91 | 1538.26 -3% | 1807.21 13% | 1135.27 -29% | 647.89 -59% | 1500.92 -6% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1604.27 | 1282.6 -20% | 1159.06 -28% | 1177.33 -27% | 1144.38 -29% | 756.72 -53% |
| 4K Write | 108.74 | 118.58 9% | 108.34 0% | 108.86 0% | 87.67 -19% | 88.05 -19% |
| 4K Read | 25.01 | 40.56 62% | 52.08 108% | 37.2 49% | 49.17 97% | 33.2 33% |
| Seq Write | 2493.16 | 2439.74 -2% | 1864.07 -25% | 2371.22 -5% | 1664.55 -33% | 1629.24 -35% |
| Seq Read | 2105.41 | 2955.46 40% | 1832.18 -13% | 1924.95 -9% | 2399.1 14% | 1952.51 -7% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3415 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2796 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
522.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
446.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1576 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2500 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
41.37 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
137.4 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 16707 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 33377 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14914 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6349 points | |
Aide | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| MSI RTX 2070 Gaming Z 8G | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (57 - 89, n=12) | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl | |
| Asus ROG GA502DU | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 9SC | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00: Ø63.3 (57-70)
| Bas | Moyen | Élevé | Ultra | ||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 306.6 | 257.7 | 234.4 | 147.8 | fps |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 295.3 | 222.9 | 136.6 | 69 | fps |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 128 | 98 | 91 | 83 | fps |
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00 | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8750H, CUK Cyclone 500GB M.2 NVMe | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 11% | 9% | -9% | 3% | 5% | |
| off / environment * | 29 | 28.8 1% | 28.3 2% | 28.3 2% | 28 3% | 28 3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.5 | 28.8 6% | 28.8 6% | 28.5 7% | 31.4 -3% | 32.6 -7% |
| Idle Average * | 31.5 | 29.5 6% | 28.8 9% | 28.5 10% | 31.4 -0% | 32.7 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.5 | 31.1 1% | 29 8% | 49 -56% | 32.2 -2% | 32.7 -4% |
| Load Average * | 40.6 | 35.2 13% | 33.5 17% | 49 -21% | 35.5 13% | 33.3 18% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.5 | 35.2 29% | 45 9% | 49 1% | 47.6 4% | 41.6 16% |
| Load Maximum * | 53.4 | 41 23% | 45.2 15% | 55 -3% | 50.8 5% | 45.2 15% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Degré de la nuisance sonore
| Au repos |
| 30.5 / 31.5 / 31.5 dB(A) |
| Fortement sollicité |
| 40.6 / 53.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencieux 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) bruyant |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.4 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.9 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 42.7 °C / 109 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.9 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 42.7 °C / 109 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.48 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Consommation énergétique
| Éteint/en veille | 0.09 / 1.54 Watts |
| Au repos | 46 / 59 / 65.5 Watts |