Courte critique du HP Omen X 2S 15 (i7-9750H, RTX 2070 Max-Q, FHD) : vision double
Appareil photo primaire: 2.1 MPix
Top 10
» Le Top 10 des PC portables multimédia
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu légers
» Le Top 10 des ordinateurs portables bureautiques
» Le Top 10 des PC portables bureautiques premium/professionnels
» Le Top 10 des Stations de travail mobiles
» Le Top 10 des Ultraportables
» Le Top 10 des Ultrabooks
» Le Top 10 des Convertibles
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes Windows
» Le Top 10 des Smartphones
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 300 euros
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 500 euros
» Le Top 25 des meilleurs écrans d'ordinateurs
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng |
|
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 84 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 324.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 1249:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.96 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6, calibrated: 3.23
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng LGD05CE, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Alienware m15 R2 P87F Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046 N156HHE-GA1, TN, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -169% | 10% | 6% | 46% | -23% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 15.2 (7.6, 7.6) | 40 (21.2, 18.8) -163% | 12.8 (6.8, 6) 16% | 16.4 (7.6, 6.8) -8% | 8.4 (4.4, 4) 45% | 18.8 (11.6, 7.2) -24% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10.8 (6, 4.8) | 29.6 (17.2, 12.4) -174% | 10.4 (6, 4.4) 4% | 8.8 (4.4, 4.4) 19% | 5.8 (4.4, 1.4) 46% | 13.2 (8, 5.2) -22% |
PWM Frequency | 23810 (10) | 23810 (24) | 25510 (34) | |||
Screen | -23% | 19% | -11% | 10% | 2% | |
Brightness middle | 324.8 | 251 -23% | 293 -10% | 324.2 0% | 307.1 -5% | 320.4 -1% |
Brightness | 316 | 232 -27% | 270 -15% | 304 -4% | 276 -13% | 298 -6% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 76 -10% | 87 4% | 90 7% | 80 -5% | 85 1% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.17 35% | 0.29 -12% | 0.38 -46% | 0.37 -42% | 0.42 -62% |
Contrast | 1249 | 1476 18% | 1010 -19% | 853 -32% | 830 -34% | 763 -39% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 4.96 | 6.2 -25% | 1.69 66% | 5.01 -1% | 2.53 49% | 3.21 35% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 8.95 | 18.6 -108% | 3.37 62% | 12.7 -42% | 4.66 48% | 5.54 38% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 3.23 | 4.8 -49% | 1.24 62% | 1.64 49% | 2.82 13% | 2.36 27% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 5 | 4.2 16% | 2.3 54% | 7.9 -58% | 1.7 66% | 3.6 28% |
Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.32 95% | 2.3 96% | 2.35 94% | 2.194 100% | 2.27 97% |
CCT | 7742 84% | 7454 87% | 6758 96% | 8455 77% | 6893 94% | 6503 100% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.8 | 36.5 -39% | 63 5% | 60.8 2% | 76 27% | 59 -1% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91.8 | 57.4 -37% | 98.5 7% | 95.5 4% | 100 9% | 92 0% |
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres) | -96% /
-45% | 15% /
17% | -3% /
-8% | 28% /
16% | -11% /
-2% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Temps de réponse de l'écran
↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc | ||
---|---|---|
10.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 6 ms hausse | |
↘ 4.8 ms chute | ||
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés. | ||
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80% | ||
15.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 7.6 ms hausse | |
↘ 7.6 ms chute | ||
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés. |
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé | |||
En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9728 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 151500) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5039 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5931 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5991 points | |
Aide |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00 | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Alienware m15 R2 P87F 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046 CUK Cyclone 500GB M.2 NVMe | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -7% | -1% | -15% | -8% | -20% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1853.64 | 907.05 -51% | 976.6 -47% | 1426.35 -23% | 1164.53 -37% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 896.18 | 392.55 -56% | 496.53 -45% | 576.02 -36% | 478.19 -47% | |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2249.66 | 1417.66 -37% | 2082.66 -7% | 2073.16 -8% | 1872.47 -17% | |
Score Total | 4743 | 4323 -9% | 4221 -11% | 3633 -23% | 3040 -36% | 3230 -32% |
Score Write | 1951 | 1901 -3% | 2102 8% | 1481 -24% | 902 -54% | 1752 -10% |
Score Read | 1840 | 1619 -12% | 1394 -24% | 1407 -24% | 1433 -22% | 985 -46% |
Access Time Write * | 0.102 | 0.032 69% | 0.034 67% | 0.108 -6% | 0.042 59% | 0.043 58% |
Access Time Read * | 0.046 | 0.084 -83% | 0.05 -9% | 0.065 -41% | 0.05 -9% | 0.077 -67% |
4K-64 Write | 1592.91 | 1538.26 -3% | 1807.21 13% | 1135.27 -29% | 647.89 -59% | 1500.92 -6% |
4K-64 Read | 1604.27 | 1282.6 -20% | 1159.06 -28% | 1177.33 -27% | 1144.38 -29% | 756.72 -53% |
4K Write | 108.74 | 118.58 9% | 108.34 0% | 108.86 0% | 87.67 -19% | 88.05 -19% |
4K Read | 25.01 | 40.56 62% | 52.08 108% | 37.2 49% | 49.17 97% | 33.2 33% |
Seq Write | 2493.16 | 2439.74 -2% | 1864.07 -25% | 2371.22 -5% | 1664.55 -33% | 1629.24 -35% |
Seq Read | 2105.41 | 2955.46 40% | 1832.18 -13% | 1924.95 -9% | 2399.1 14% | 1952.51 -7% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
3DMark 11 Performance | 16707 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 33377 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14914 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 6349 points | |
Aide |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
MSI RTX 2070 Gaming Z 8G | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (57 - 89, n=12) | |
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl | |
Asus ROG GA502DU | |
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC |
Bas | Moyen | Élevé | Ultra | ||
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 306.6 | 257.7 | 234.4 | 147.8 | fps |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 295.3 | 222.9 | 136.6 | 69 | fps |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 128 | 98 | 91 | 83 | fps |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00 | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8750H, CUK Cyclone 500GB M.2 NVMe | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 11% | 9% | -9% | 3% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 29 | 28.8 1% | 28.3 2% | 28.3 2% | 28 3% | 28 3% |
Idle Minimum * | 30.5 | 28.8 6% | 28.8 6% | 28.5 7% | 31.4 -3% | 32.6 -7% |
Idle Average * | 31.5 | 29.5 6% | 28.8 9% | 28.5 10% | 31.4 -0% | 32.7 -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.5 | 31.1 1% | 29 8% | 49 -56% | 32.2 -2% | 32.7 -4% |
Load Average * | 40.6 | 35.2 13% | 33.5 17% | 49 -21% | 35.5 13% | 33.3 18% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.5 | 35.2 29% | 45 9% | 49 1% | 47.6 4% | 41.6 16% |
Load Maximum * | 53.4 | 41 23% | 45.2 15% | 55 -3% | 50.8 5% | 45.2 15% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Degré de la nuisance sonore
Au repos |
| 30.5 / 31.5 / 31.5 dB(A) |
Fortement sollicité |
| 40.6 / 53.4 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silencieux 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) bruyant |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.9 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 42.7 °C / 109 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.48 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Éteint/en veille | ![]() ![]() |
Au repos | ![]() ![]() ![]() |