Notebookcheck

Test du Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB (i7-10875H, RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 4K UHD) : les débuts des Super Max-Q

Mise à jour matérielle. Alors que l’Aero 17 HDR ressemble extérieurement à son prédécesseur, beaucoup de choses ont changé sous le capot. En plus du nouveau processeur, le portable de jeu de 17 pouces possède une carte graphique mise à jour. Découvrez comment ces deux composants se complètent.
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Felicitas Krohn (traduit par Prévots),
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB (Aero 17 Gamme)
Processeur
Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q - 8192 Mo, Processeur: 930 MHz, Mémoire: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 445.87, Optimus
Mémoire
16384 Mo 
, 2x 8 Go SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, double canal, tous les emplacements occupés, jusqu'à 64 Go
Écran
17.3 pouces 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPP, AUO B173ZAN03.2 (AUO329B), IPS, X-Rite Pantone, UHD/4K, brillant: non, HDR, 60 Hz
Carte mère
Intel HM470
Disque dur
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, 512 Go 
, NVMe, emplacements : 2 M.2 Type 2280
Carte son
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Comet Point-LP PCH - cAVS
Connexions
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Connectique audio: 1 écouteurs, 1 micro, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: SD, SDHC, SDXC, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales
Réseau
Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 21 x 396 x 270
Batterie
94 Wh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: HD
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: 2x 2W, Clavier: chiclet RVB, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, adaptateur secteur 230 watts, guide de démarrage rapide, pate thermique, Control Center, 24 Mois Garantie
Poids
2.656 kg, Alimentation: 724 g
Prix
2600 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Épaisseur
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
87 %
05/20
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
2.7 kg21 mm17.3"3840x2160
86 %
09/19
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.5 kg21.4 mm17.3"3840x2160
84 %
03/20
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.6 kg20.5 mm17.3"1920x1080
83 %
07/19
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.3 kg18.9 mm17.3"1920x1080
81 %
01/20
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.7 kg18.7 mm17.3"1920x1080
88 %
09/19
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.8 kg19.9 mm17.3"1920x1080

Comparaison des tailles

399.8 mm 295.5 mm 20.5 mm 2.6 kg399 mm 272 mm 18.7 mm 2.7 kg396 mm 270 mm 21.4 mm 2.5 kg396 mm 270 mm 21 mm 2.7 kg396 mm 259 mm 18.9 mm 2.3 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.8 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
207 MB/s ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
200.8 MB/s ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
174.4 MB/s ∼84% -16%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
245 MB/s ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
238.3 MB/s ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
203.4 MB/s ∼83% -17%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1390 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
924 MBit/s ∼66% -34%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1410 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1110 MBit/s ∼79% -21%
ColorChecker
21.2 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
27.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB: 11.47 ∆E min: 4.76 - max: 27.46 ∆E
475
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
AUO B173ZAN03.2 (AUO329B)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 487 cd/m² Moyenne: 475.3 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 95 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 487 cd/m²
Contraste: 1282:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.19 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8, calibrated: 0.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.45 | 0.64-98 Ø6
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
AUO B173ZAN03.2 (AUO329B), IPS, 3840x2160
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
AU Optronics B173ZAN03.2, IPS, 3840x2160
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Chi Mei 173HCE, CMN175F, IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 1920x1080
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
AU Optronics B173HAN05.1, IPS, 1920x1080
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
0%
64%
75%
81%
76%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
55.2 (26.8, 28.4)
45.6 (24.4, 21.2)
17%
17.2 (8.8, 8.4)
69%
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
87%
5.6 (2.4, 3.2)
90%
6.8 (3.4, 3.4)
88%
Response Time Black / White *
26 (9.2, 16.8)
30.4 (16.4, 14)
-17%
10.8 (6, 4.8)
58%
10 (5.2, 4.8)
62%
7.6 (3.4, 4.2)
71%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
63%
PWM Frequency
26320 (25)
25510 (17)
Screen
-86%
-25%
-19%
-43%
-86%
Brightness middle
487
667.3
37%
384.2
-21%
366
-25%
288
-41%
299.3
-39%
Brightness
475
633
33%
357
-25%
343
-28%
276
-42%
294
-38%
Brightness Distribution
95
90
-5%
90
-5%
91
-4%
93
-2%
94
-1%
Black Level *
0.38
0.46
-21%
0.29
24%
0.29
24%
0.24
37%
0.29
24%
Contrast
1282
1451
13%
1325
3%
1262
-2%
1200
-6%
1032
-20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.19
3.53
-197%
1.35
-13%
1.51
-27%
1.92
-61%
2.55
-114%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.43
6.88
-183%
3.45
-42%
3.22
-33%
4.57
-88%
4.73
-95%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.5
3.79
-658%
1.42
-184%
0.71
-42%
1.14
-128%
2.9
-480%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.45
0.9
38%
1.2
17%
1.93
-33%
3.08
-112%
3.5
-141%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.17 101%
2.23 99%
2.38 92%
2.42 91%
2.28 96%
CCT
6557 99%
6533 99%
6580 99%
6881 94%
7055 92%
7101 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88
87.1
-1%
65.5
-26%
60
-32%
65
-26%
57
-35%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
100
0%
98.5
-1%
94
-6%
96
-4%
88.7
-11%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-43% / -73%
20% / -11%
28% / -5%
19% / -24%
-5% / -61%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
26 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 9.2 ms hausse
↘ 16.8 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (24.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
55.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 26.8 ms hausse
↘ 28.4 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (38.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 17567 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
 
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610162016301640165016601670168016901700Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1572 (1548.11-1671.4)
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1328 (1301.11-1593.37)
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1640 (1625.22-1699.96)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
211 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
Intel Core i9-9980HK
201 Points ∼95% -5%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
195 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
180 Points ∼85% -15%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
180 Points ∼85% -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
173 Points ∼82% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1754 Points ∼100% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1671 (1548.11min - 1671.4max) Points ∼95%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1481 Points ∼84% -11%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
1233 Points ∼70% -26%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
1180 Points ∼67% -29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
1097 Points ∼63% -34%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
499 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
Intel Core i9-9980HK
487 Points ∼98% -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
478 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
434 Points ∼87% -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
422 Points ∼85% -15%
CPU (Multi Core)
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
4136 Points ∼100% +21%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
3431 Points ∼83%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
Intel Core i9-9980HK
3104 Points ∼75% -10%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
2723 Points ∼66% -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
2357 Points ∼57% -31%
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7803
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
44805
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6835
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
88.46 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.4 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
18.69 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
211 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
143 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1671 Points
Aide
PCMark 10 - Score
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6483 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6049 Points ∼93% -7%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5955 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
5804 Points ∼90% -10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5734 Points ∼88% -12%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
5502 Points ∼85% -15%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
1933.4 μs * ∼100%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-5%
-6%
1%
-26%
-27%
Write 4K
123.4
169.6
37%
110.6
-10%
95.46
-23%
96.09
-22%
100.7
-18%
Read 4K
45.59
57.97
27%
41.46
-9%
42.59
-7%
40.86
-10%
41.03
-10%
Write Seq
2320
1516
-35%
2378
3%
2851
23%
1317
-43%
1146
-51%
Read Seq
2013
2362
17%
2114
5%
2696
34%
1030
-49%
1115
-45%
Write 4K Q32T1
489.3
481.8
-2%
445.4
-9%
402.6
-18%
350.4
-28%
384.6
-21%
Read 4K Q32T1
558.8
505.8
-9%
509.3
-9%
443.9
-21%
404.1
-28%
429.5
-23%
Write Seq Q32T1
2979
1530
-49%
2735
-8%
3420
15%
2396
-20%
1859
-38%
Read Seq Q32T1
3432
2645
-23%
3206
-7%
3514
2%
3194
-7%
3179
-7%
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3432 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2979 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 558.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 489.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2013 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2320 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.59 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 123.4 MB/s
3DMark 06 Standard
43406 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
65101 points
3DMark 11 Performance
24130 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
38593 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18582 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
7650 points
Aide
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø76.2 (70-80)
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
5148 Points ∼100% +15%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
5092 Points ∼99% +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4713 Points ∼92% +5%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4545 Points ∼88% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
4477 Points ∼87%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3668 Points ∼71% -18%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8844 Points ∼100% +18%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8479 Points ∼96% +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8036 Points ∼91% +8%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7923 Points ∼90% +6%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
7468 Points ∼84%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6479 Points ∼73% -13%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
23032 Points ∼100% +10%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
22391 Points ∼97% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
20917 Points ∼91% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
20914 Points ∼91%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
20119 Points ∼87% -4%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16658 Points ∼72% -20%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
30910 Points ∼100% +8%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
29220 Points ∼95% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
29052 Points ∼94% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
28555 Points ∼92%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
27204 Points ∼88% -5%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21464 Points ∼69% -25%
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
91.3 fps ∼100%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
20.06 fps ∼100%
Showcase (showcase-02)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
94.11 fps ∼100%
Medical (medical-02)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
52.64 fps ∼100%
Maya (maya-05)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
221.52 fps ∼100%
Energy (energy-02)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
18.47 fps ∼100%
Creo (creo-02)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
172.03 fps ∼100%
Catia (catia-05)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
128.86 fps ∼100%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
181.23 fps ∼100%
The Witcher 3
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
49.7 (44min) fps ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
46.9 fps ∼94% -6%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
87.4 fps ∼100% +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
80.7 fps ∼92% +7%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
78 fps ∼89% +4%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
76.9 fps ∼88% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
75.3 (63min) fps ∼86%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
66.5 fps ∼76% -12%
Bas Moyen Élevé UltraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 182 175 160 89.9 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 240 142 75.3 49.7 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 163.9 146.6 139.5 131.4 fps
Fortnite (2018) 133 132 108 86.2 43 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 104 80 33 fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 127 108 75.9 54.4 27.9 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 119 104 87.6 fps
Monster Hunter World (2018) 113 102 84.2 55.7 27.5 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 118 110 99 68 36 fps
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 99 81 62 47 32 fps
Hitman 2 (2018) 89.2 83.2 79.7 76.1 41.5 fps
Battlefield V (2018) 144 135 125 99.4 56.8 fps
Darksiders III (2018) 135 118 107 71.6 36.4 fps
Just Cause 4 (2018) 137 101 93.4 63.6 34.5 fps
Apex Legends (2019) 144 144 143 109 61.1 fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 98 92 83 70 43 fps
Metro Exodus (2019) 92 72 57.7 49.1 26.5 fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 183 155 85.8 66 fps
The Division 2 (2019) 123 113 81 60 29 fps
Anno 1800 (2019) 112 85.5 47.4 36.6 21.1 fps
Rage 2 (2019) 119 99.5 97.1 62.8 30.1 fps
F1 2019 (2019) 191 159 143 107 61 fps
Control (2019) 92.6 68.4 43.9 21.1 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 112 78 59.6 41.7 22.2 fps
FIFA 20 (2019) 271 259 257 253 186 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 101 89 66 49 28 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 131 104 71.1 60.6 39.7 fps
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 134 126 104 72.3 41 fps
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 103 94 82.6 60.5 33.4 fps
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 109 104 94.1 71.3 35.9 fps
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 91.3 61.8 40.2 32 20.5 fps
Escape from Tarkov (2020) 121 116 107 79.8 36.8 fps
Hunt Showdown (2020) 109 96.8 56.8 27.4 fps
Doom Eternal (2020) 157 139 135 99.6 51.2 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.632.738.335.230.637.82535.238.340.440.438.541.9313233.433.332.729.9334036.633.433.233.228.335.15033.530.431.529.927.238.76330.928.630.330.826.936.18027.225.826.626.324.233.510028.127.427.827.124.632.512528.826.726.327.623.933.816029.127.829.827.723.434.420029.624.224.22521.73225031.324.72425.320.53431532.927.326.224.619.937.540033.728.827.425.618.639.850035.829.728.927.418.741.163034.42725.724.417.939.380035.626.825.724.817.640.6100035.226.425.324.417.342125036.227.625.923.919.342.7160036.927.525.823.918.744200036.626.824.823.317.544.5250035.425.824.626.717.343.2315035.326.5232117.342400035.322.5212017.441.8500032.321.319.81917.542.563002919.418.418.417.338.4800024.718.117.917.917.433.51000021.417.917.917.917.330.61250020.317.9181817.326.21600020.81817.918.217.322.2SPL46.637.736.235.330.153.7N5.62.82.52.31.39.3median 32.9median 26.5median 24.8median 24.4median 17.6median 39.3Delta4.32.52.331.74.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseGigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
35 / 36 / 38 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
47 / 54 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Noise
6%
7%
5%
7%
11%
off / environment *
30
29.3
2%
29.1
3%
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.2
6%
Idle Minimum *
35
33
6%
29.4
16%
31
11%
32
9%
28.2
19%
Idle Average *
36
33
8%
29.4
18%
32
11%
33
8%
28.2
22%
Idle Maximum *
38
33
13%
31.5
17%
38
-0%
34
11%
30.8
19%
Load Average *
47
42.5
10%
49.7
-6%
47
-0%
40
15%
42
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49
42
14%
49.5
-1%
48
2%
49
-0%
51
-4%
Load Maximum *
54
59.6
-10%
53.3
1%
49
9%
50
7%
53
2%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

 45 °C53 °C46 °C 
 37 °C44 °C42 °C 
 34 °C36 °C35 °C 
Maximum: 53 °C
Moyenne: 41.3 °C
59 °C59 °C46 °C
57 °C57 °C40 °C
36 °C38 °C35 °C
Maximum: 59 °C
Moyenne: 47.4 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  45 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.4 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 42.6 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-9.2 °C / -16.6 F).
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Heat
-4%
-20%
-9%
-3%
9%
Maximum Upper Side *
53
46.8
12%
54.2
-2%
55
-4%
50
6%
43
19%
Maximum Bottom *
59
62.2
-5%
61.4
-4%
65
-10%
47
20%
47.2
20%
Idle Upper Side *
27
29
-7%
37.8
-40%
30
-11%
33
-22%
27.2
-1%
Idle Bottom *
29
34
-17%
38.6
-33%
32
-10%
34
-17%
30
-3%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.635.32538.538.93129.931.74028.336.25027.237.26326.940.18024.235.610024.637.912523.947.216023.444.720021.754.925020.559.131519.960.240018.668.150018.769.463017.977.180017.679100017.376.8125019.373.8160018.773.2200017.571.5250017.370.1315017.372.5400017.474.5500017.572.7630017.373.9800017.466.51000017.360.81250017.364.51600017.369SPL30.185.6N1.366.8median 17.6median 69.4Delta1.76.944.442.144.442.240.442.240.83840.84038.74036.736.636.738.539.138.535.737.335.736.73536.741.934.141.954.432.754.460.733.160.76232626732.36771.931.371.973.630.173.677.529.677.579.228.379.273.429.173.470.928.770.97428.27478.328.178.372.728.172.772.92872.971.427.871.465.227.665.262.927.762.968.727.668.772.227.672.268.127.668.166.327.466.385.840.685.867.8467.8median 70.9median 28.3median 70.95.72.35.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte Aero 17 HDR XBAlienware m17 R2 P41E
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Alienware m17 R2 P41E audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.2 / 1.2 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 16 / 19 / 30 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 109 / 246 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Power Consumption
-7%
-52%
12%
-26%
3%
Idle Minimum *
16
13.9
13%
24.7
-54%
13
19%
32
-100%
16.2
-1%
Idle Average *
19
24.3
-28%
35.9
-89%
17
11%
34
-79%
20.4
-7%
Idle Maximum *
30
35.5
-18%
69.6
-132%
25
17%
36
-20%
26.1
13%
Load Average *
109
127.6
-17%
141.8
-30%
96
12%
95
13%
96.5
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
167
158
5%
185.8
-11%
156
7%
155
7%
182.9
-10%
Load Maximum *
246
237.5
3%
235.4
4%
239
3%
187
24%
214.3
13%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
9h 52min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 12min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
2h 20min
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Autonomie de la batterie
2%
-43%
-24%
-53%
-38%
Reader / Idle
592
711
20%
426
-28%
461
-22%
246
-58%
295
-50%
WiFi v1.3
372
431
16%
290
-22%
357
-4%
182
-51%
280
-25%
Load
140
98
-30%
31
-78%
74
-47%
69
-51%
86
-39%
H.264
410
168

Points positifs

+ écran 4K : luminosité, espaces colorimétriques, couleurs
+ robuste et élégant
+ connectique moderne
+ performances
+ batterie

Points négatifs

- écran 4K : temps de réponse, seulement 60 Hz
- touches fonctions secondaires sans rétroéclairage
- position des ports
- position de la webcam
- niveau sonore en 3D
En test : l'Aero 17 HDR. Modèle de test fourni par Gigabyte Allemagne.
En test : l'Aero 17 HDR. Modèle de test fourni par Gigabyte Allemagne.

La mise à jour du Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR devrait satisfaire à peu près tous les utilisateurs.

 

Alors que les créatifs apprécieront l’écran 4K lumineux avec des couleurs fidèles, les joueurs aussi seront comblés, grâce au processeur octocœur et à la carte graphique haut de gamme. Gigabyte a pensé à tout – ou presque. Le châssis robuste marque des points, avec de bons périphériques d’entrée et une connectique complète incluant le Thunderbolt 3. L’autonomie est également impressionnante pour un portable de jeu.

Si ce n’était le niveau sonore en cas de sollicitations et quelques détails (positionnement de la webcam, absence de rétroéclairage pour les touches fonction secondaires, et le positionnement des ports), nous aurions tout apprécié sur l’Aero 17 HDR.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB - 04/21/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Châssis
87 / 98 → 89%
Clavier
85%
Dispositif de pointage
81%
Connectivité
68 / 80 → 85%
Poids
59 / 10-66 → 87%
Autonomie
70 / 95 → 73%
Écran
94%
Performances en jeu
95%
Performances dans les applications
95%
Chauffe
80 / 95 → 84%
Nuisance sonore
58 / 90 → 64%
Audio
81%
Appareil photo
39 / 85 → 46%
Moyenne
77%
87%
Gaming - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB (i7-10875H, RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 4K UHD) : les débuts des Super Max-Q
Florian Glaser, 2020-05-24 (Update: 2020-05-24)