Notebookcheck

Test du Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL (i7-8565U, GTX 1650 Max-Q, FHD) : polyvalent mais avec une vraie faiblesse

Christian Hintze, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (traduit par Prévots), 10/07/2019

Presqu'un ultrabook. Le 15 pouces polyvalent intègre une GTX 1650 Max-Q dans un châssis en aluminium élégant et fin, et marque les esprits par ses bons résultats dans nos tests – entre autres, un écran lumineux et bien contrasté, et un SSD rapide. Mais il souffre également d’un défaut non négligeable.

Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE (Ideapad S540 Gamme)
Processeur
Intel Core i7-8565U
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 26.21.14.3111, Umschaltung zu Intel UHD Graphics 620
Mémoire
12288 Mo 
Écran
15.6 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPP, CMN N156HCE-EN1, IPS, brillant: non
Carte mère
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disque dur
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, 1024 Go 
, 918 Go libres
Carte son
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Connexions
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, Connectique audio: AMD/Intel, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: SD grand format, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales
Réseau
Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth Bluetooth 4.2
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 19.1 x 358 x 245
Batterie
70 Wh Lithium-Ion, Autonomie de la batterie (selon les données du fabricant): 15 h
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: 720p HD avec infrarouge
Appareil photo primaire: 1 MPix
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo (2x 2W), Clavier: AccuType , Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, 24 Mois Garantie, 24 mois (service d'envoi et de retour gratuit), batterie : 12 mois
Poids
1.876 kg, Alimentation: 455 g
Prix
1099 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparaison des tailles

360.4 mm 262 mm 26.8 mm 2.2 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg358 mm 245 mm 19.1 mm 1.9 kg357 mm 234 mm 16 mm 1.7 kg
Côté gauche : entrée secteur, HDMI, USB C (3.0), audio.
Côté gauche : entrée secteur, HDMI, USB C (3.0), audio.
Côté droit : lecteur de carte SD, 2 USB-A (3.1).
Côté droit : lecteur de carte SD, 2 USB-A (3.1).
A l'avant : aucune connectivité.
A l'avant : aucune connectivité.
A l'arrière : aucune connectivité.
A l'arrière : aucune connectivité.
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
172.4 MB/s ∼100% +119%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82.9 MB/s ∼48% +5%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80.5 MB/s ∼47% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.6 MB/s ∼46%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 190, n=177)
57.9 MB/s ∼34% -26%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
192.1 MB/s ∼100% +123%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89.9 MB/s ∼47% +4%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼45% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86.3 MB/s ∼45%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.2 - 253, n=174)
74 MB/s ∼39% -14%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
674 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
674 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
646 MBit/s ∼96% 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
645 MBit/s ∼96%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
586 MBit/s ∼87% -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (44 - 949, n=140)
501 MBit/s ∼74% -22%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
679 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
677 MBit/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
644 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
617 MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (46.1 - 949, n=139)
483 MBit/s ∼71% -29%
326
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
309
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
CMN N156HCE-EN1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 338 cd/m² Moyenne: 315.1 cd/m² Minimum: 6.5 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 88 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 332 cd/m²
Contraste: 1650:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 2.7
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
88.5% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 57.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
CMN N156HCE-EN1, , 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
LGD05CE, , 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
CMN N156HCE-EN1 (CMN15E8), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Panda LM156LF-GL, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, , 3840x2160, 15.6
Response Times
-1%
-6%
15%
29%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39.2 (21.2, 18)
40 (21.2, 18.8)
-2%
41.6 (23.6, 18)
-6%
30.4 (14, 16.4)
22%
2.3 (1.1, 1.2)
94%
Response Time Black / White *
29.6 (16.4, 13.2)
29.6 (17.2, 12.4)
-0%
32.8 (22.8, 10)
-11%
27.6 (17.6, 10)
7%
2.4 (1.1, 1.3)
92%
PWM Frequency
25510 (20)
25510 (28)
0%
59.52 (100)
-100%
Screen
-35%
-6%
-42%
8%
Brightness middle
330
251
-24%
207
-37%
286.2
-13%
421.2
28%
Brightness
315
232
-26%
199
-37%
267
-15%
417
32%
Brightness Distribution
88
76
-14%
84
-5%
84
-5%
94
7%
Black Level *
0.2
0.17
15%
0.22
-10%
0.33
-65%
Contrast
1650
1476
-11%
941
-43%
867
-47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.4
6.2
-41%
3.77
14%
5.45
-24%
6.06
-38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.4
18.6
-151%
5.98
19%
18.08
-144%
11.89
-61%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.7
4.8
-78%
2.59
4%
4.47
-66%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.8
4.2
12%
3.22
33%
5.3
-10%
2.8
42%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.32 95%
2.42 91%
2.1 105%
2.15 102%
CCT
6760 96%
7454 87%
7072 92%
7679 85%
6235 104%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57.8
36.5
-37%
57
-1%
37.6
-35%
81
40%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
88.5
57.4
-35%
88
-1%
59.1
-33%
99.6
13%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-18% / -30%
-6% / -6%
-14% / -33%
19% / 14%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
29.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 16.4 ms hausse
↘ 13.2 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 71 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (24.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
39.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 21.2 ms hausse
↘ 18 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (39.7 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 25510 Hz ≤ 20 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 25510 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 20 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 25510 Hz est élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9352 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

LatencyMon
LatencyMon
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø624 (617.82-662.76)
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø639 (616.5-695)
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H: Ø741 (732.32-778.15)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
Intel Core i7-8565U
189 Points ∼100%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
Intel Core i7-8565U
183 Points ∼97% -3%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
171 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (73.1 - 193, n=48)
171 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
157 Points ∼83% -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
152 Points ∼80% -20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 201, n=366)
128 Points ∼68% -32%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
799 Points ∼100% +28%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
769 Points ∼96% +24%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
Intel Core i7-8565U
695 Points ∼87% +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
Intel Core i7-8565U
622 (min: 617.82, max: 662.76) Points ∼78%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
600 (min: 548.41, max: 619.74) Points ∼75% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (361 - 815, n=49)
585 Points ∼73% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (73 - 1550, n=382)
486 Points ∼61% -22%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
Intel Core i7-8565U
2.16 Points ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
1.88 Points ∼87% -13%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (0.65 - 2.16, n=10)
1.78 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.39 - 2.28, n=418)
1.295 Points ∼60% -40%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
Intel Core i7-8565U
6.9 Points ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
6.45 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (4.09 - 7.4, n=10)
6.23 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.59 - 17.6, n=684)
3.76 Points ∼54% -46%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
Intel Core i7-8565U
9435 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (5474 - 9435, n=6)
8104 Points ∼86% -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
7975 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1011 - 9435, n=512)
4450 Points ∼47% -53%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
Intel Core i7-8565U
25638 Points ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
25361 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (14542 - 26851, n=6)
21376 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1968 - 45795, n=512)
11997 Points ∼47% -53%
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6820 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
9435 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
25638 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
6.9 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
76.12 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.16 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.62 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
189 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
109 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
622 Points
Aide
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5282 Points ∼100% +7%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5044 Points ∼95% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4947 Points ∼94%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4918 Points ∼93% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (4680 - 4947, n=3)
4848 Points ∼92% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1001 - 7161, n=97)
3727 Points ∼71% -25%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
GeForce MX250, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3637 Points ∼69% -26%
Productivity
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
7261 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (7175 - 7201, n=3)
7184 Points ∼99% 0%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7177 Points ∼99% 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7175 Points ∼99%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
GeForce MX250, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6654 Points ∼92% -7%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
6518 Points ∼90% -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1407 - 8020, n=98)
6167 Points ∼85% -14%
Essentials
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (8709 - 9067, n=3)
8852 Points ∼100% +2%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
8781 Points ∼99% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8709 Points ∼98%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
8575 Points ∼97% -2%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8355 Points ∼94% -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
GeForce MX250, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8264 Points ∼93% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2891 - 9829, n=98)
7508 Points ∼85% -14%
Score
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
4873 Points ∼100% +1%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4851 Points ∼100% 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4847 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (4828 - 4851, n=3)
4842 Points ∼99% 0%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4732 Points ∼97% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
GeForce MX250, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4192 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1144 - 5469, n=98)
3953 Points ∼81% -18%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5145 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (5132 - 5145, n=2)
5139 Points ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5107 Points ∼99% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
GeForce MX250, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4965 Points ∼97% -3%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4701 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2213 - 5651, n=280)
4300 Points ∼84% -16%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
GeForce MX250, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4220 Points ∼100% +12%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
3917 Points ∼93% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (3758 - 3764, n=2)
3761 Points ∼89% 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3758 Points ∼89%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
3691 Points ∼87% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1371 - 4693, n=301)
3383 Points ∼80% -10%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3758 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5145 points
Aide
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-14%
-22%
7%
-3%
Write 4K
173.02
139.8
-19%
137.5
-21%
112.1
-35%
149 (132 - 173, n=3)
-14%
Read 4K
51.88
46.24
-11%
56.96
10%
42.01
-19%
48.9 (46.7 - 51.9, n=3)
-6%
Write Seq
1066.91
1346
26%
983.8
-8%
1964
84%
1150 (1067 - 1234, n=2)
8%
Read Seq
1023.91
1446
41%
1564
53%
2065
102%
998 (973 - 1024, n=2)
-3%
Write 4K Q32T1
462.04
346.8
-25%
237.4
-49%
318.2
-31%
436 (268 - 576, n=3)
-6%
Read 4K Q32T1
548.72
451.2
-18%
340.7
-38%
406.7
-26%
521 (360 - 655, n=3)
-5%
Write Seq Q32T1
3010.8
1456
-52%
958.8
-68%
2534
-16%
3019 (3011 - 3033, n=3)
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
3520.3
1748
-50%
1732
-51%
3438
-2%
3521 (3481 - 3561, n=3)
0%
AS SSD
-43%
-60%
-25%
-5%
Copy Game MB/s
866.7
907.05
691
Copy Program MB/s
444.49
392.55
267
Copy ISO MB/s
942.16
1417.66
1131
Score Total
5123
3370
-34%
1717
-66%
4323
-16%
5126 (5087 - 5169, n=3)
0%
Score Write
2161
1492
-31%
992
-54%
1901
-12%
2134 (1986 - 2256, n=3)
-1%
Score Read
1947
1240
-36%
472
-76%
1619
-17%
1972 (1851 - 2118, n=3)
1%
Access Time Write *
0.027
0.022
19%
0.047
-74%
0.032
-19%
0.0327 (0.027 - 0.041, n=3)
-21%
Access Time Read *
0.032
0.112
-250%
0.065
-103%
0.084
-163%
0.037 (0.032 - 0.04, n=3)
-16%
4K-64 Write
1781.54
1182.37
-34%
787.44
-56%
1538.26
-14%
1771 (1650 - 1883, n=3)
-1%
4K-64 Read
1671.3
1041.99
-38%
321.49
-81%
1282.6
-23%
1692 (1599 - 1806, n=3)
1%
4K Write
138.24
172.47
25%
115.48
-16%
118.58
-14%
123 (105 - 138, n=3)
-11%
4K Read
58.5
48
-18%
48.22
-18%
40.56
-31%
53.6 (45.5 - 58.5, n=3)
-8%
Seq Write
2411
1371.86
-43%
888.5
-63%
2439.74
1%
2403 (2314 - 2484, n=3)
0%
Seq Read
2170
1502.19
-31%
1019.04
-53%
2955.46
36%
2262 (1954 - 2661, n=3)
4%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-29% / -30%
-41% / -44%
-9% / -11%
-4% / -4%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Sequential Read: 1055.2 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1081.2 MB/s
512K Read: 591.17 MB/s
512K Write: 1361.33 MB/s
4K Read: 69.62 MB/s
4K Write: 173.56 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 537.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 456.63 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
13575 Points ∼100% +15%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
13447 Points ∼99% +14%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8565U
11764 Points ∼87%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (10422 - 11764, n=5)
11085 Points ∼82% -6%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8565U
11046 Points ∼81% -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i5-8265U
4942 Points ∼36% -58%
Average of class Multimedia
  (352 - 20837, n=634)
2963 Points ∼22% -75%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
9536 Points ∼100% +17%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
9428 Points ∼99% +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8565U
8128 Points ∼85%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8565U
7740 Points ∼81% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (6985 - 8128, n=4)
7612 Points ∼80% -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i5-8265U
3720 Points ∼39% -54%
Average of class Multimedia
  (337 - 16100, n=408)
2855 Points ∼30% -65%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
57365 Points ∼100% +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8565U
49016 Points ∼85%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8565U
48312 Points ∼84% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (27748 - 49016, n=4)
42941 Points ∼75% -12%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
40948 Points ∼71% -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i5-8265U
23643 Points ∼41% -52%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2468 - 77755, n=413)
16879 Points ∼29% -66%
3DMark 11 Performance
10679 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
20219 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7107 points
Aide
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 147925030.4fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 1201059488fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 696252.1fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 151533433fps
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
37 fps ∼100% +22%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
36.2 fps ∼98% +19%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
30.4 (min: 29, max: 33, 99th percentile: 29) fps ∼82%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (28.8 - 30.7, n=3)
30 fps ∼81% -1%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
28.8 (min: 23) fps ∼78% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2.9 - 80.8, n=96)
19.3 fps ∼52% -37%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
12 fps ∼32% -61%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
62.7 fps ∼100% +25%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
62.2 fps ∼99% +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (48.1 - 54.3, n=3)
50.8 fps ∼81% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
50 fps ∼80%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
48.1 (min: 39) fps ∼77% -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.8 - 117, n=106)
29.1 fps ∼46% -42%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
19.8 fps ∼32% -60%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
109.6 fps ∼100% +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (92 - 93.6, n=2)
92.8 fps ∼85% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
92 fps ∼84%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.2 - 206, n=104)
44.3 fps ∼40% -52%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
34.5 fps ∼31% -62%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
157.1 fps ∼100% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (147 - 156, n=2)
152 fps ∼97% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
147 fps ∼94%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
146.4 fps ∼93% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8.9 - 296, n=109)
64.7 fps ∼41% -56%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
47.4 fps ∼30% -68%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
41 fps ∼100% +24%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
38 (min: 12) fps ∼93% +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (33 - 38, n=3)
35 fps ∼85% +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
33 fps ∼80%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6 - 58, n=15)
25.3 fps ∼62% -23%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
45 fps ∼100% +32%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
43 (min: 18) fps ∼96% +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (34 - 43, n=3)
38.7 fps ∼86% +14%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
34 fps ∼76%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6 - 62, n=18)
26.2 fps ∼58% -23%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
53 fps ∼100%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
52 fps ∼98% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (47 - 53, n=3)
49.3 fps ∼93% -7%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
47 (min: 26) fps ∼89% -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6 - 65, n=21)
28.2 fps ∼53% -47%
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
151 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (92 - 151, n=2)
122 fps ∼81% -19%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
62 fps ∼41% -59%
Average of class Multimedia
  (13 - 151, n=22)
59.8 fps ∼40% -60%
0510152025303540Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø30.4 (29-33)
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
GeForce MX250, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Noise
-17%
-13%
-4%
0%
off / environment *
28.8
30
-4%
28.2
2%
28.8
-0%
29.3
-2%
Idle Minimum *
28.9
32
-11%
28.2
2%
28.8
-0%
29.3
-1%
Idle Average *
28.9
33
-14%
28.2
2%
29.5
-2%
29.3
-1%
Idle Maximum *
30.1
34
-13%
31.4
-4%
31.1
-3%
29.3
3%
Load Average *
34.6
44
-27%
39.8
-15%
35.2
-2%
34.4
1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
34.6
41
-18%
47
-36%
35.2
-2%
34.4
1%
Load Maximum *
34.6
45
-30%
50.2
-45%
41
-18%
34.9
-1%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
28.9 / 28.9 / 30.1 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
34.6 / 34.6 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 28.8 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2026.330.427.530.62525.72625.926.1312724.525.328.94027.425.526.227.85026.222.621.926.96323.423.422.323.48023.923.221.924.210025.123.922.825.512523.723.52224.216022.52321.423.420023.223.220.522.825022.923.723.223.531521.12320.922.640021.423.619.223.650021.12419.523.963021.122.818.523.580020.521.718.12210002021.917.821.512502023.317.222.816002022.716.522.5200019.323.616.422.6250019.22315.622.5315020.523.815.323.1400022.724.515.123.950001821.815.123.2630016.318.815.217.9800015.917.51516.51000015.416.214.815.5125001515.214.715.11600014.715.614.614.7SPL31.934.628.834.3N1.62.11.22.1median 20.5median 23median 17.2median 22.8Delta21.62.81.526.526.629.830.829.732.231.225.82628.12525.523.525.324.725.824.527.624.725.631.726.823.826.92823.825.230.723.323.325.123.322.724.323.923.122.924.822.22422.822.423.721.823.121.722.721.323.4222323.921.62321.523.922.32323.721.722.421.622.222.322.223.322.422.222.321.223.123.222.721.220.721.421.223.423.422.621.422.321.32223.222.621.920.720.720.520.525.422.922.620.6202020.428.425.624.120.720.819.520.927.326.624.520.519.618.919.628.826.423.920.319.318.419.430.32825.620.518.917.92030.828.925.920.418.217.21831.729.826.320.117.316.417.332.828.524.519.216.71616.630.927.423.717.916.215.91625.822.419.616.115.715.415.628.324.621.717.615.815.415.626.723.220.316.215.41515.325.321.818.815.515.21515.121.918.516.715.115.114.915.119.216.71614.814.914.914.91615.315.414.614.714.714.814.914.715.414.614.514.414.74138.235.230.729.528.829.53.52.72.21.41.31.21.3median 25.4median 23.2median 22.7median 20.3median 18.2median 17.2median 183.22.62.12.22.72.62.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GEHP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
GeForce MX250, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Heat
-28%
-22%
-4%
-4%
Maximum Upper Side *
42.5
56
-32%
41.2
3%
40.3
5%
41.8
2%
Maximum Bottom *
45
60
-33%
40
11%
48.5
-8%
43.3
4%
Idle Upper Side *
22.7
29
-28%
34.6
-52%
23.9
-5%
25.1
-11%
Idle Bottom *
23
27
-17%
34.4
-50%
24.6
-7%
25.4
-10%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

 40.9 °C42.5 °C40.6 °C 
 38.1 °C38.8 °C30.1 °C 
 29.8 °C26.7 °C25.7 °C 
Maximum: 42.5 °C
Moyenne: 34.8 °C
36.5 °C45 °C43.1 °C
28.5 °C38.5 °C38.2 °C
26.7 °C30.6 °C31.8 °C
Maximum: 45 °C
Moyenne: 35.4 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  45.2 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.3 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.1 °C / 84.4 F (-0.7 °C / -1.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.531.62525.929.83125.330.64026.230.65021.924.16322.323.68021.923.110022.824.11252226.816021.441.220020.553.125023.258.931520.960.140019.26250019.562.363018.565.380018.165.5100017.864.6125017.263.8160016.557.5200016.455.8250015.656.7315015.353.6400015.147.4500015.150.8630015.248.480001551.21000014.853.31250014.748.81600014.650SPL28.871.9N1.228.4median 17.2median 53.6Delta2.85.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GEApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (17% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.39 / 0.62 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 4.2 / 7.8 / 10.2 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 73.6 / 92.7 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
8265U, GeForce MX250, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Power Consumption
-10%
-29%
-15%
26%
Idle Minimum *
4.2
6
-43%
7
-67%
4.04
4%
2.74
35%
Idle Average *
7.8
8
-3%
9.9
-27%
7.2
8%
5.64
28%
Idle Maximum *
10.2
12
-18%
12
-18%
11.4
-12%
8.4
18%
Load Average *
73.6
76
-3%
68.4
7%
80.8
-10%
61.3
17%
Load Maximum *
92.7
102
-10%
130.9
-41%
144.5
-56%
69.4
25%
Witcher 3 ultra *
75
60
20%
94.9
-27%
93.6
-25%
49.2
34%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Battery Runtime The Witcher 3 ultra
1h 03min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 46min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 max Brightness
7h 10min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
14h 36min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
1h 57min
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE
8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 57 Wh
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 52.5 Wh
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 48 Wh
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 97 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Autonomie de la batterie
-17%
-29%
10%
-36%
30%
-25%
Reader / Idle
1044
951
724
466
910
406 (73 - 2085, n=888)
H.264
876
482
-45%
363 (114 - 1053, n=106)
-59%
WiFi v1.3
526
486
-8%
385
-27%
542
3%
285
-46%
467
-11%
360 (96 - 942, n=248)
-32%
Witcher 3 ultra
63
59
-6%
74.6 (62 - 94, n=10)
18%
Load
117
88
-25%
71
-39%
137
17%
87
-26%
199
70%
85.5 (32 - 238, n=890)
-27%

Points positifs

+ contraste et luminosité de l'écran
+ SSD
+ élégant
+ aluminium
+ plutôt fin et léger
+ lecteur de carte SD grand format
+ reste frais
+ webcam avec cache
+ maintenance aisée
+ clavier rétroéclairé

Points négatifs

- ventilateurs
- performances
- un emplacement de RAM
- pas de LAN
- pas de charge via USB C
- pas de verrou Kensington
- angle inférieur droit du touchpad bruyant

Verdict

En test : le Lenovo S540-15IWL. Modèle de test fourni par campuspoint.
En test : le Lenovo S540-15IWL. Modèle de test fourni par campuspoint.

Lenovo propose un ensemble équilibré, qui permet à la machine d’atteindre un bon niveau de polyvalence, rarement atteint par la concurrence : un excellent écran, un SSD très rapide, des composants efficients, un design élégant, et une maintenance aisée (si vous possédez un tournevis Torx) ne sont que quelques-uns de ses points forts.

Bien sûr, l’IdeaPad possède également des défauts, mais dont la plupart sont peu graves, comme l’absence de connectivité LAN, de légères baisses de performances (à cause du refroidissement), et l’absence de deuxième emplacement de RAM. Mais il nous faut signaler un défaut majeur : alors que Lenovo utilise un système de refroidissement peu bruyant, ce point positif est contrecarré par un bruit très aigu. Le fabriquant devrait vite corriger cela ! Mais les étudiants et autres clients potentiels peu sensibles pourront avoir la machine pour environ 1 100 €.

Ceux qui n’ont pas des oreilles trop sensibles et qui supporteront le bruit aigu des ventilateurs auront un appareil très équilibré avec l’IdeaPad S540 de 15 pouces, qui propose d’excellents composants et une bonne qualité de construction.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE - 09/30/2019 v7
Christian Hintze

Châssis
85 / 98 → 87%
Clavier
84%
Dispositif de pointage
85%
Connectivité
50 / 80 → 62%
Poids
65 / 20-72 → 86%
Autonomie
87 / 95 → 91%
Écran
86%
Performances en jeu
83 / 90 → 92%
Performances dans les applications
86 / 90 → 95%
Chauffe
90%
Nuisance sonore
90 / 95 → 95%
Audio
61%
Appareil photo
38 / 85 → 45%
Moyenne
76%
85%
Multimedia - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL (i7-8565U, GTX 1650 Max-Q, FHD) : polyvalent mais avec une vraie faiblesse
Christian Hintze, 2019-10- 7 (Update: 2019-10- 7)