Notebookcheck

Test du Schenker XMG Core 17 (Tongfang GM7MG0R) : PC portable de jeu configurable avec écran WQHD

Une mise en œuvre réussie. Le matériel puissant du Schenker XMG Core 17 est capable d'afficher tous les jeux informatiques actuels sur l'écran réactif (WQHD, IPS, 165 Hz, 17,3 pouces). Le centre de contrôle préinstallé vous permet d'ajuster le développement des performances du processeur et du GPU.
Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduit par DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Avec le XMG Core 17 (début 2021), Schenker ajoute à son offre un ordinateur portable de jeu de la gamme moyenne supérieure. L'unité de test qui nous a été fournie fonctionne avec un Core i7-10870Het d'unGeForce RTX-3060 laptopGPU. Parmi les concurrents, on trouve des appareils tels que le MSI Alpha 17 A4DEKleAcer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54et le Medion Erazer Beast X10.

La construction de l'ordinateur portable étant dans une large mesure identique à celle de ses deux prédécesseurs, nous ne parlerons pas du boîtier, du matériel de connexion, des périphériques d'entrée et des haut-parleurs, sauf en cas de différences. Vous trouverez les informations correspondantes sur ces caractéristiques dans notre critique duXMG Core 17 (2019).

, , , , , ,
relation de la recherche.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Processeur
Intel Core i7-10870H 8 x 2.2 - 5 GHz, 60 W PL2 / Short Burst, 60 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake-H
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU - 6144 Mo, Processeur: 1425 MHz, Mémoire: 1750 MHz, 130 W TDP, GDDR6, 27.21.14.6647, Optimus
Mémoire
16384 Mo 
, DDR4-3200, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use), max. 64 GB
Écran
17.30 pouces 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPP, BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, brillant: non, 165 Hz
Carte mère
Intel HM470
Disque dur
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 Go 
, 2 M.2-2280 slots, NVMe; RAID-0 support, 883 Go libres
Carte son
Realtek ALC274 @ Intel Comet Point-H PCH - cAVS
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: headset out, microphone in, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0
Réseau
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 30.05 x 395.7 x 260.8
Batterie
62 Wh, 4100 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: HD
Appareil photo primaire: 0.9 MPix
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stereo, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, sticker, 24 Mois Garantie
Poids
2.546 kg, Alimentation: 428 g
Prix
1814 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in the Comparison

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Épaisseur
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
84 %
06/21
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg30.05 mm17.30"2560x1440
83 %
02/21
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M
2.6 kg28 mm17.30"1920x1080
84 %
10/20
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.8 kg25 mm17.30"1920x1080
85 %
11/20
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
2.3 kg24.6 mm17.30"1920x1080

Size Comparison

404 mm 280 mm 25 mm 2.8 kg399 mm 272 mm 28 mm 2.6 kg395.7 mm 260.8 mm 30.05 mm 2.5 kg394.8 mm 261.8 mm 24.6 mm 2.3 kg

Connexions - L'ordinateur portable Schenker n'offre pas de Thunderbolt

Au niveau des connexions, quelque chose a changé par rapport aux prédécesseurs : Les deux connexions Mini-DisplayPort ont été supprimées, et le port USB-C prend désormais en charge la norme USB 3.2 Gen 2 (avant : USB 3.2 Gen 1) et également DisplayPort via USB-C.

Côté droit : lecteur de carte de stockage (SD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type A)
Côté droit : lecteur de carte de stockage (SD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type A)
Côté gauche : emplacement pour un verrou de câble, USB 2.0 (Type A), entrée microphone, sortie casque
Côté gauche : emplacement pour un verrou de câble, USB 2.0 (Type A), entrée microphone, sortie casque
Arrière : USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type C ; DisplayPort 1.4, compatible G-Sync), HDMI 2.1 (HDCP 2.3), Gigabit Ethernet, alimentation électrique
Arrière : USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type C ; DisplayPort 1.4, compatible G-Sync), HDMI 2.1 (HDCP 2.3), Gigabit Ethernet, alimentation électrique
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 222, n=94, last 2 years)
113 MB/s ∼100% +512%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77 MB/s ∼68% +317%
Schenker XMG Core 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25 MB/s ∼22% +35%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25 MB/s ∼22% +35%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
18.46 MB/s ∼16%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (20.5 - 257, n=94, last 2 years)
127 MB/s ∼100% +518%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s ∼68% +319%
Schenker XMG Core 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27 MB/s ∼21% +31%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26 MB/s ∼20% +27%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
20.54 MB/s ∼16%
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1541 (1418min - 1606max) MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1340 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1230 MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1180 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=243)
1157 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (294 - 1645, n=163, last 2 years)
1062 MBit/s ∼69% -31%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1010 MBit/s ∼66% -34%
Schenker XMG Core 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
670 MBit/s ∼43% -57%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1711 (861min - 1776max) MBit/s ∼100%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1480 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1450 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1420 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=243)
1239 MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (140 - 1743, n=163, last 2 years)
1128 MBit/s ∼66% -34%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1100 MBit/s ∼64% -36%
Schenker XMG Core 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
689 MBit/s ∼40% -60%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017508611705174217221662172516931682171617051705168217141684171117171738166817761739170116661742172117501681171917131714170686117051742172216621725169316821716170517051682171416841711171717381668177617391701166617421721175016811719171317141706156715671530158215481525151915451442141816061542154915411603156415311564154515481488152315511565153115481528157515451547Tooltip
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1682 (861-1776)
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1541 (1418-1606)

Affichage - IPS WQHD 165 Hz

Si la luminosité (332,7 cd/m²) de l'écran mat de 17,3 pouces (2560 x 1440 pixels) s'avère bonne, le contraste (974:1) pourrait être amélioré, manquant de peu l'objectif (> 1000:1). La dalle de 165 Hz offre des temps de réponse rapides et ne produit pas de scintillement PWM. Schenker propose également en option un écran FHD (IPS, 144 Hz)

323
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
344
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 370 cd/m² Moyenne: 332.7 cd/m² Minimum: 10 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 84 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 370 cd/m²
Contraste: 974:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.41 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6, calibrated: 1.19
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.46% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.08% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.287
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AU Optronics AUO978F, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
LG Phillips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Schenker XMG Core 17
LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB1 (LGD0615), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
BOE HF NV173FHM-N44, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display
-41%
-6%
-4%
-4%
-5%
Display P3 Coverage
68.08
39.55
-42%
62.57
-8%
64.49
-5%
64.44
-5%
65.31
-4%
sRGB Coverage
98.46
59.15
-40%
94.25
-4%
95.62
-3%
95.57
-3%
92.58
-6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69.35
40.86
-41%
64.65
-7%
65.59
-5%
65.6
-5%
66.46
-4%
Response Times
-165%
-3%
7%
9%
-3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16.8 (8.4, 8.4)
40 (19.6, 20.4)
-138%
16.4 (8, 8.4)
2%
14.4 (7.6, 6.8)
14%
14.4 (7.6, 6.8)
14%
17.6 (8.4, 9.2)
-5%
Response Time Black / White *
10 (4.8, 5.2)
29.2 (15.6, 13.6)
-192%
10.8 (5.6, 5.2)
-8%
10 (5.2, 4.8)
-0%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
4%
10 (5.2, 4.8)
-0%
PWM Frequency
24510 (19)
1000 (99)
Screen
-46%
27%
-5%
1%
-16%
Brightness middle
370
254
-31%
322
-13%
313
-15%
329
-11%
315
-15%
Brightness
333
254
-24%
308
-8%
297
-11%
286
-14%
298
-11%
Brightness Distribution
84
93
11%
92
10%
88
5%
79
-6%
88
5%
Black Level *
0.38
0.23
39%
0.18
53%
0.27
29%
0.3
21%
0.29
24%
Contrast
974
1104
13%
1789
84%
1159
19%
1097
13%
1086
11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.41
4.12
-71%
1.53
37%
2.96
-23%
2.52
-5%
4.3
-78%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.32
19.66
-169%
3.14
57%
9.83
-34%
6.9
6%
7.3
-0%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.19
3.78
-218%
0.74
38%
1.03
13%
1.31
-10%
2.29
-92%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.9
3.2
18%
1.9
51%
4.9
-26%
2.98
24%
4.3
-10%
Gamma
2.287 96%
2.179 101%
2.144 103%
2.187 101%
2.38 92%
2.084 106%
CCT
7302 89%
6754 96%
6809 95%
7559 86%
6738 96%
7434 87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
69
41
-41%
65
-6%
66
-4%
60
-13%
66
-4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
59
-37%
87
-6%
89
-4%
95
2%
92
-1%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-84% / -60%
6% / 17%
-1% / -3%
2% / 1%
-8% / -12%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

En l'état de livraison, l'écran offre une bonne reproduction des couleurs, répondant à l'objectif (Delta E < 3) avec un écart de couleur de 2,41. L'écran ne souffre pas d'une teinte bleue. L'étalonnage permet d'obtenir quelques améliorations, l'écart de couleur tombant à 1,19 et l'affichage en niveaux de gris devenant plus équilibré. Les espaces couleur AdobeRGB (69 %) et sRGB (93 %) ne sont pas entièrement couverts

CalMAN : Niveaux de gris
CalMAN : Niveaux de gris
CalMAN : Saturation
CalMAN : Saturation
CalMAN : ColorChecker
CalMAN : ColorChecker
CalMAN : Niveaux de gris (calibrés)
CalMAN : Niveaux de gris (calibrés)
CalMAN : Saturation (calibrée)
CalMAN : Saturation (calibrée)
CalMAN : ColorChecker (calibré)
CalMAN : ColorChecker (calibré)
Schenker XMG Core 17 vs sRGB (93%)
Schenker XMG Core 17 vs sRGB (93%)
Grille de sous-pixels
Grille de sous-pixels
Schenker XMG Core 17 vs AdobeRGB (69%)
Schenker XMG Core 17 vs AdobeRGB (69%)

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
10 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 4.8 ms hausse
↘ 5.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
16.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 8.4 ms hausse
↘ 8.4 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 52 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 14793 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Les angles de vision de l'écran IPS sont stables et le contenu de l'écran peut être lu depuis n'importe quelle position. En extérieur, le contenu de l'écran peut être lu si le soleil n'est pas trop fort

Le Core 17 en extérieur (ciel couvert)
Le Core 17 en extérieur (ciel couvert)
Angles de vue
Angles de vue

Performance - Suffisante pour les prochaines années

Le XMG Core 17 est capable de porter à l'écran tous les jeux actuels en douceur et fait également bonne figure dans tous les autres domaines d'application

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 

Conditions d'essai

Vous pouvez basculer entre les trois profils de performance "Balanced", "Enthusiast" et "Overboost" via le centre de contrôle préinstallé ou la touche de changement de profil (à côté du bouton d'alimentation). Pour notre test, nous avons utilisé le profil "Enthusiast" (PL1/PL2 : 60 watts) et le contrôle automatique du ventilateur. Plusieurs benchmarks ont également été effectués avec le profil "Overboost" (PL1/PL2 : 75 watts) activé. Pour les tests de batterie, nous avons utilisé le profil "Balanced" (PL1/PL2 : 35 watts).

Processeur

Le siteCore i7-10870Hocta-core (Comet Lake) fonctionne à une vitesse d'horloge de base de 2,2 GHz. Via Turbo, celle-ci peut être augmentée jusqu'à un maximum de 4,2 GHz (huit cœurs) et 5 GHz (un seul cœur). L'hyperthreading (deux threads par cœur) est pris en charge.

Le processeur passe les tests CPU du benchmark Cinebench R15 entre 3 et 3,8 GHz (multithread) et entre 4 et 4,8 GHz (single thread). En mode batterie, le processeur fonctionne à des vitesses d'horloge comprises entre 2,6 et 2,9 GHz (multithread) et entre 2,4 et 4,2 GHz (single thread).

Multi-thread (fonctionnement sur secteur)
Multi-thread (fonctionnement sur secteur)
Single thread (opération principale)
Single thread (opération principale)

Nous évaluons si le CPU Turbo est également utilisé de manière constante en fonctionnement sur secteur en exécutant le test multithread du benchmark Cinebench R15 pendant au moins 30 minutes dans une boucle constante. Le Turbo est utilisé à un niveau moyen. Le profil de performance "Overboost" n'entraîne qu'une légère augmentation de la vitesse d'horloge.

Globalement, le Core i7 n'exploite pas pleinement ses capacités dans les benchmarks multithread. Pour en tirer plus de performances, il faudrait relever les limites de puissance du CPU, ce qui serait possible via le Control Center préinstallé, où le maximum configurable serait de 120 watts (PL1/PL2). Nous avons également fait tourner la boucle CB15 avec ce paramètre de performance afin de tester cela - sans rencontrer de problème.

010020030040050060070080090010001100120013001400150016001700180019001316.831324.331327.11379.261374.051372.641365.281374.521364.541343.091337.031382.981382.221365.281380.021368.181377.791378.221359.481364.581357.311376.981358.741377.031372.591366.771370.381366.731378.551364.541365.281375.041363.841374.051379.261381.51376.271382.221376.981366.351474.5514721462.791467.781459.481440.561467.841453.651465.261472.921464.451456.131447.911469.451464.41462.791450.381466.171458.631456.931462.741466.171472.921477.11464.41470.321465.311466.971466.971471.181453.651466.111463.591472.541451.171454.491432.511464.451470.321467.781677.081646.561650.571649.281653.231650.911651.81650.781649.481653.781648.531652.011651.731646.841652.891649.551650.911653.171644.471649.481647.721652.011651.941650.571654.331645.891656.041647.111647.181647.241639.141650.781649.211652.141645.081649.141649.281651.661653.441650.571982.551959.821948.561940.431936.951927.251925.111921.141926.231923.911927.991918.11924.191923.171920.311929.761924.461920.581920.221918.281920.031922.341917.911885.11876.791322.621319.911306.421295.171295.171307.751300.471298.491293.911287.371287.421289.951287.371297.141297.821293.241293.21287.371284.771279.021286.051277.751285.431279.021288.661286.091277.751279.021288.71281.61284.151284.151280.941284.151282.221284.811282.261282.871287.371282.831364.111350.531332.271339.231342.731339.231342.781352.681354.11349.121343.451342.731337.171342.731351.951359.111354.11344.91347.711345.531351.211346.981339.231351.261351.211337.841345.531343.451339.941350.531349.81347.711343.451347.711349.121339.231355.521356.251347.661342.061099.871097.091024.67998.281005.731007.731004.551008.52998.681003.761000.231004.951004.951006.921004.551006.521002.21006.141004.551010.891006.521007.33999.831002.961006.921002.981007.331003.361003.761001.81004.571004.171007.731008.121004.951002.981003.761004.571010.48999.851299.171204.421202.361203.881195.421200.441194.321201.61198.251198.291198.361199.91200.481192.641191.51201.021197.681197.11202.181193.211198.791204.421187.651195.991193.741188.781198.791195.991196.571199.361190.971203.31201.061193.781192.641200.481190.441193.211192.071197.1Tooltip
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H: Ø1367 (1316.83-1382.98)
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H; Overboost: Ø1463 (1432.51-1477.1)
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H; Overboost, PL1/2 120 Watt: Ø1651 (1639.14-1677.08)
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1926 (1876.79-1982.55)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1290 (1277.75-1322.62)
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1347 (1332.27-1364.11)
Schenker XMG Core 17 Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1010 (998.28-1099.87)
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1200 (1187.65-1299.17)
Vitesses d'horloge du CPU lors de l'exécution de la boucle CB15
Vitesses d'horloge du CPU lors de l'exécution de la boucle CB15
Vitesses d'horloge du CPU pendant l'exécution de la boucle CB15 (Overboost)
Vitesses d'horloge du CPU pendant l'exécution de la boucle CB15 (Overboost)
Vitesses d'horloge du CPU pendant l'exécution de la boucle CB15 (Overboost, PL1/2 : 120 watts)
Vitesses d'horloge du CPU pendant l'exécution de la boucle CB15 (Overboost, PL1/2 : 120 watts)
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
196 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1382 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
147.31 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Aide
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
209 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (196 - 204, n=11)
200 Points ∼96% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
196 Points ∼94% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
196 Points ∼94%
Average of class Gaming
  (108 - 254, n=199, last 2 years)
196 Points ∼94% 0%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
195 Points ∼93% -1%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
190 Points ∼91% -3%
Schenker XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H
180 Points ∼86% -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1983 (1876.79min - 1982.55max) Points ∼100% +43%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost, PL1/2 120 Watt)
1677 Points ∼85% +21%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (1336 - 1740, n=14)
1614 Points ∼81% +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (536 - 2804, n=211, last 2 years)
1498 Points ∼76% +8%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
1477 Points ∼74% +7%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
1382 Points ∼70%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
1364 Points ∼69% -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
1323 Points ∼67% -4%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
1299 (1187.65min - 1299max) Points ∼66% -6%
Schenker XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H
1100 Points ∼55% -20%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
358 Seconds * ∼100% -10%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
351 Seconds * ∼98% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 633, n=153, last 2 years)
330 Seconds * ∼92% -1%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
326 Seconds * ∼91%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
322 Seconds * ∼90% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
315 Seconds * ∼88% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (272 - 333, n=12)
298 Seconds * ∼83% +9%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
254 Seconds * ∼71% +22%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
5438 MIPS ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
5393 MIPS ∼99%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
5297 MIPS ∼97% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (5145 - 5429, n=12)
5293 MIPS ∼97% -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
5191 MIPS ∼95% -4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
5190 MIPS ∼95% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2945 - 6174, n=154, last 2 years)
5188 MIPS ∼95% -4%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4686 MIPS ∼86% -13%
7z b 4
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
52364 MIPS ∼100% +28%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (39581 - 46708, n=12)
44452 MIPS ∼85% +9%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
44110 MIPS ∼84% +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (15146 - 75612, n=154, last 2 years)
43260 MIPS ∼83% +6%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
40876 MIPS ∼78%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
37082 MIPS ∼71% -9%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
36771 MIPS ∼70% -10%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
31612 MIPS ∼60% -23%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
491 Points ∼100% +3%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
485 Points ∼99% +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 634, n=188, last 2 years)
484 Points ∼99% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
476 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (460 - 484, n=12)
474 Points ∼97% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
471 Points ∼96% -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
463 Points ∼94% -3%
Schenker XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H
441 Points ∼90% -7%
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4497 Points ∼100% +39%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (3027 - 4020, n=12)
3588 Points ∼80% +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (1397 - 6321, n=189, last 2 years)
3504 Points ∼78% +8%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
3354 Points ∼75% +3%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
3244 Points ∼72%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
3144 Points ∼70% -3%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
2968 Points ∼66% -9%
Schenker XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H
2434 Points ∼54% -25%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
1333 Points ∼100% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
1331 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (703 - 1777, n=149, last 2 years)
1295 Points ∼97% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (1191 - 1295, n=12)
1273 Points ∼95% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
1268 Points ∼95% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
1264 Points ∼95%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
1262 Points ∼95% 0%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1201 Points ∼90% -5%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
8047 Points ∼100% +20%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (6403 - 7882, n=12)
7482 Points ∼93% +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2783 - 11393, n=149, last 2 years)
7143 Points ∼89% +7%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
7025 Points ∼87% +5%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
6688 Points ∼83%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
6652 Points ∼83% -1%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
6394 Points ∼79% -4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
6349 Points ∼79% -5%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
13.3 fps ∼100% +20%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (10.7 - 13.5, n=12)
12.2 fps ∼92% +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (4.4 - 19.8, n=153, last 2 years)
11.9 fps ∼89% +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
11.6 fps ∼87% +5%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
11.6 fps ∼87% +5%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
11.1 fps ∼83%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.4 fps ∼78% -6%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.2 fps ∼77% -8%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
59.2 s * ∼100% -6%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
56.1 s * ∼95%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
54.3 s * ∼92% +3%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
54.1 s * ∼91% +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 98.2, n=141, last 2 years)
54 s * ∼91% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (46 - 64.4, n=12)
53.7 s * ∼91% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
48.36 s * ∼82% +14%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
46 s * ∼78% +18%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.614 sec * ∼100% -6%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.593 sec * ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
0.593 sec * ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (0.573 - 0.614, n=12)
0.591 sec * ∼96% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.4907 - 1.088, n=145, last 2 years)
0.587 sec * ∼96% -2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.578 sec * ∼94% -0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.577 sec * ∼94%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.574 sec * ∼93% +1%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Performance du système

Ce système rapide et fluide offrira également des performances suffisantes pour les prochaines années dans des domaines d'application exigeants tels que les jeux et le traitement des vidéos et des images. Les résultats de PC-Mark sont également bons.

La mémoire de travail (DDR4-3200, 2x 8 Go, max. 64 Go) fonctionne en mode bicanal.
La mémoire de travail (DDR4-3200, 2x 8 Go, max. 64 Go) fonctionne en mode bicanal.
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4073 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5816 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5375 points
PCMark 10 Score
5685 points
Aide
PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming
  (3952 - 7884, n=181, last 2 years)
5936 Points ∼100% +4%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
5911 Points ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5685 Points ∼96%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
 
5685 Points ∼96% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5657 Points ∼95% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5581 Points ∼94% -2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5185 Points ∼87% -9%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
5109 Points ∼86% -10%
Essentials
Schenker XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
9728 Points ∼100% +6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
9555 Points ∼98% +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (7148 - 11266, n=179, last 2 years)
9532 Points ∼98% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9209 Points ∼95% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
9182 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
 
9182 Points ∼94% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
9096 Points ∼94% -1%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8873 Points ∼91% -3%
Productivity
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
8057 Points ∼100% +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (5633 - 10066, n=179, last 2 years)
8033 Points ∼100% +11%
Schenker XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
7735 Points ∼96% +7%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
7557 Points ∼94% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7415 Points ∼92% +3%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
7318 Points ∼91% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
7217 Points ∼90%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
 
7217 Points ∼90% 0%
Digital Content Creation
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8632 Points ∼100% +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (3670 - 12250, n=179, last 2 years)
7553 Points ∼88% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
7526 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
 
7526 Points ∼87% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6912 Points ∼80% -8%
Schenker XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
6530 Points ∼76% -13%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5504 Points ∼64% -27%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
4702 Points ∼54% -38%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (2832 - 6277, n=106, last 2 years)
4501 Points ∼100% +11%
Schenker XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
4401 Points ∼98% +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4350 Points ∼97% +7%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
4291 Points ∼95% +5%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
4136 Points ∼92% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
4073 Points ∼90%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
 
4073 Points ∼90% 0%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
5817 Points ∼100% +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5792 Points ∼100% +8%
Schenker XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5697 Points ∼98% +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (4265 - 7104, n=106, last 2 years)
5614 Points ∼97% +4%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5610 Points ∼96% +4%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5375 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
 
5375 Points ∼92% 0%

Latences DPC

Dans notre test standardisé Latency Monitor (surf sur le Web, reproduction de vidéos 4K, charge élevée Prime95), nous avons pu observer un comportement manifeste en termes de latences DPC. Cela signifie que le système ne semble pas être adapté au traitement vidéo et audio en temps réel

Moniteur de latence
Moniteur de latence
Moniteur de latence
Moniteur de latence
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8655.1 μs * ∼100% -1066%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
1000 μs * ∼12% -35%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
787 μs * ∼9% -6%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
742.6 μs * ∼9%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
505.9 μs * ∼6% +32%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Solution de stockage

Un SSD NVMe (M.2-2280) de Samsung sert de lecteur système. Il offre 1 To de stockage et fournit de bons taux de transfert. L'ordinateur portable est capable d'accepter un total de deux SSD NVMe, et le RAID-0 est pris en charge.

L'ordinateur portable peut accueillir deux disques SSD NVMe.
L'ordinateur portable peut accueillir deux disques SSD NVMe.
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3522 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3294 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 582.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 510.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2837 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3036 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 51.34 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 145.7 MB/s
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Schenker XMG Core 17
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-31%
-12%
-17%
-29%
4%
Write 4K
145.7
204.7
40%
141.9
-3%
151
4%
99.34
-32%
169.5
16%
Read 4K
51.34
50.42
-2%
48.75
-5%
49.29
-4%
38.47
-25%
51.47
0%
Write Seq
3036
985
-68%
2734
-10%
1109
-63%
1449
-52%
3009
-1%
Read Seq
2837
1193
-58%
1921
-32%
1049
-63%
1237
-56%
2959
4%
Write 4K Q32T1
510.7
537.4
5%
422.6
-17%
494.4
-3%
364.4
-29%
536.3
5%
Read 4K Q32T1
582.4
300
-48%
508.5
-13%
568.5
-2%
421.9
-28%
621.1
7%
Write Seq Q32T1
3294
982.1
-70%
3055
-7%
3017
-8%
3276
-1%
3339
1%
Read Seq Q32T1
3522
1985
-44%
3257
-8%
3542
1%
3338
-5%
3561
1%
AS SSD
-43%
-11%
-3%
-20%
11%
Seq Read
2875.85
251.95
-91%
2827.8
-2%
2470.07
-14%
2283.15
-21%
2936.65
2%
Seq Write
2802.79
924.59
-67%
2676.93
-4%
2472.91
-12%
2778.79
-1%
2858.32
2%
4K Read
55.33
58.19
5%
39.94
-28%
50.23
-9%
29.99
-46%
50.26
-9%
4K Write
106.9
98.03
-8%
100.95
-6%
124.39
16%
99.05
-7%
130.55
22%
4K-64 Read
1662.47
461.43
-72%
1562.35
-6%
1711.12
3%
1155.56
-30%
1709.93
3%
4K-64 Write
2101.1
923.83
-56%
1867.16
-11%
1847.98
-12%
2333.21
11%
2354.78
12%
Access Time Read *
0.067
0.09
-34%
0.039
42%
0.092
-37%
0.037
45%
Access Time Write *
0.037
0.022
41%
0.037
-0%
0.029
22%
0.037
-0%
0.028
24%
Score Read
2005
545
-73%
1885
-6%
2008
0%
1414
-29%
2054
2%
Score Write
2488
1114
-55%
2236
-10%
2220
-11%
2710
9%
2771
11%
Score Total
5520
1994
-64%
5076
-8%
5257
-5%
4871
-12%
5873
6%
Copy ISO MB/s
2028.86
1870.05
-8%
1908.65
-6%
1394.02
-31%
2224.71
10%
Copy Program MB/s
691.17
545
-21%
587.88
-15%
379.77
-45%
778.52
13%
Copy Game MB/s
1513.01
1082.61
-28%
975
-36%
976.21
-35%
1590.11
5%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-37% / -38%
-12% / -11%
-10% / -8%
-25% / -23%
8% / 8%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Constant Performance Reads: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0180360540720900108012601440162018001980216023402520270028803060324034203249.533476.873477.083478.553478.973478.973479.593482.743482.953483.79348434843486.13486.13486.313486.523486.723487.353489.033490.923490.923491.133491.973491.973492.113493.233493.443493.653494.423494.483494.693495.323495.533495.743496.163496.373496.373496.373496.583496.793498.183498.893499.443500.573500.993501.43503.423503.923509.93515.251830.61979.951982.041983.921984.131984.341984.551984.551984.551984.761984.761984.761984.971984.971984.971984.971984.971984.971984.971984.971985.161985.181985.181985.181985.391985.581985.61985.791985.79198619861986.211986.211986.421986.421986.431986.431986.641986.641986.841986.841986.851987.051987.051987.051987.061987.061987.261987.271987.481846.541848.011849.271850.741851.161851.371852.411852.411853.251853.671854.091854.512188.173059.953217.033217.873220.183220.8132253225.213225.843226.053227.733229.193230.033230.243230.663231.713232.133232.553232.973232.973234.233235.073235.73235.913236.533236.953237.163237.793238.423239.053240.13240.523243.253243.253244.713250.173252.683258.352978.293369.883373.693374.113376.373377.213377.423378.263378.933380.143383.133385.583386.423386.843387.673388.093388.513389.773389.983389.983389.983390.813391.093391.863392.143393.193393.333393.333393.333393.823393.953394.873395.213395.293396.053396.053396.473396.673396.763396.883397.723397.933397.933398.773398.983401.163401.493403.3734043409.343273.193544.613545.033545.033545.453545.653545.863546.073546.073546.073546.493546.493546.73546.73546.73546.913547.123547.333547.333547.333547.373547.753547.753547.963547.963547.963547.963547.963547.963548.173548.173548.383548.593548.593548.83548.83549.013549.013549.043549.223549.223549.433549.643549.643549.853549.883550.483551.323551.533551.97Tooltip
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB: Ø3487 (3249.53-3515.25)
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB: Ø1982 (1830.6-1987.48)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00: Ø2878 (1846.54-3258.35)
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø3383 (2978.29-3409.34)
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB: Ø3542 (3273.19-3551.97)

Carte graphique

LeGeForce RTX-3060représente le modèle d'entrée de gamme actuel de Nvidia en matière de GPU haut de gamme. Le GPU est capable d'utiliser un stockage graphique rapide GDDR6 (6144 Mo). Le site UHD Graphics-630intégré au processeur est actif, et l'ordinateur portable utilise la solution de commutation graphique Optimus de Nvidia. Le GPU GeForce peut être désactivé dans le BIOS.

Les fabricants d'ordinateurs portables peuvent configurer assez librement le TGP et donc la puissance de calcul maximale disponible d'un cœur graphique RTX 3000, tant qu'ils restent dans les limites définies par Nvidia (voir ci-dessous)Aperçu de tous les ordinateurs portables RTX 3060, y compris leurs TGPSchenker étend cette possibilité aux utilisateurs en leur permettant de régler librement le TGP jusqu'à un maximum de 130 watts (115 watts + 15 watts Dynamic Boost).

Cependant, à un TGP élevé TGP élevé, l'augmentation des performances s'avère limitée : Même si le profil "Overboost" (115 watts + 5 watts Dynamic Boost) utilise un TGP qui est environ 26% plus élevé que le profil "Enthusiast" (90 watts + 5 watts Dynamic Boost)En revanche, les résultats des tests ne sont supérieurs que de 10 %, que ce soit pour les tests du GPU ou pour les benchmarks de jeu.

Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike (Overboost)
Fire Strike (Overboost)
Fire Strike (Overboost, TGP : 130 watts)
Fire Strike (Overboost, TGP : 130 watts)
Fire Strike (fonctionnement sur batterie)
Fire Strike (fonctionnement sur batterie)
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
Time Spy
Time Spy
Port Royal
Port Royal
Fire Strike Ultra (Overboost)
Fire Strike Ultra (Overboost)
Time Spy (Overboost)
Time Spy (Overboost)
Port Royal (Overboost)
Port Royal (Overboost)
Fire Strike Ultra (Overboost, TGP : 130 watts)
Fire Strike Ultra (Overboost, TGP : 130 watts)
Time Spy (Overboost, TGP : 130 watts)
Time Spy (Overboost, TGP : 130 watts)
Port Royal (Overboost, TGP : 130 watts)
Port Royal (Overboost, TGP : 130 watts)
3DMark 11 Performance
21813 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
41707 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17355 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
7758 points
Aide
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
21937 Points ∼100% +8%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
21683 Points ∼99% +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
21446 Points ∼98% +5%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
20381 Points ∼93%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (17960 - 22460, n=15)
20156 Points ∼92% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (1360 - 34993, n=201, last 2 years)
19446 Points ∼89% -5%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
16498 Points ∼75% -19%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
16408 Points ∼75% -19%
Schenker XMG Core 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
14537 Points ∼66% -29%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
9818 Points ∼45% -52%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
8495 Points ∼100% +10%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
8333 Points ∼98% +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
7837 Points ∼92% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (7041 - 8840, n=15)
7835 Points ∼92% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
7716 Points ∼91%
Average of class Gaming
  (429 - 13210, n=200, last 2 years)
7453 Points ∼88% -3%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
6219 Points ∼73% -19%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
5555 Points ∼65% -28%
Schenker XMG Core 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
5464 Points ∼64% -29%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
3554 Points ∼42% -54%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
27153 Points ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
26790 Points ∼99%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (22063 - 30200, n=13)
26177 Points ∼96% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (1925 - 43077, n=192, last 2 years)
25603 Points ∼94% -4%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
22720 Points ∼84% -15%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
20697 Points ∼76% -23%
Schenker XMG Core 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
19156 Points ∼71% -28%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
13256 Points ∼49% -51%

Performances en matière de jeux

Le matériel est capable de porter à l'écran tous les jeux actuels de manière fluide. En règle générale, vous pouvez utiliser la pleine résolution de l'écran (2560 x 1440 pixels, WQHD) et des paramètres de qualité élevés à maximaux lorsque vous jouez. La résolution FHD permet d'obtenir un niveau de qualité maximal.

Comparé à tous les ordinateurs portables RTX 3060 que nous avons testés jusqu'à présent, le Core 17 s'en sort très bien. En général, les différences de taux de trame entre les appareils ne s'avèrent pas trop importantes, malgré les différentes configurations TGP. Comme le montrent les résultats du Core 17, même une augmentation significative de la valeur TGP n'entraînera qu'une légère augmentation des taux de trame

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
92.5 fps ∼100% +16%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
88.5 (77min - 102max) fps ∼96% +11%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
85.7 (38.8min, 41.6P0.1, 55.9P1 - 178max) fps ∼93% +8%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
80.3 (76min - 86max) fps ∼87% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
79.5 (30.1min, 37.6P0.1, 42.6P1 - 167max) fps ∼86%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
79.4 (63min) fps ∼86% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (68.3 - 88.5, n=13)
76.4 fps ∼83% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.3 - 123, n=194, last 2 years)
75 fps ∼81% -6%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
72.9 (62min) fps ∼79% -8%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
68.7 (63min - 74max) fps ∼74% -14%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
68.5 (52min) fps ∼74% -14%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
61 (50min) fps ∼66% -23%
Schenker XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
53.3 fps ∼58% -33%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
42.3 fps ∼46% -47%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
123 (108.1min) fps ∼100% +4%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
121 (104.1min) fps ∼98% +3%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
118 (102.7min) fps ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.6 - 156, n=137, last 2 years)
115 fps ∼93% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (90.7 - 130, n=15)
114 fps ∼93% -3%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
113 (97.5min) fps ∼92% -4%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
112 (99min) fps ∼91% -5%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
111 (97.6min) fps ∼90% -6%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
105 (93.1min) fps ∼85% -11%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
105 (93min) fps ∼85% -11%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
90.7 (76.9min) fps ∼74% -23%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
78.9 fps ∼100% +15%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
77.9 fps ∼99% +13%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
75.7 fps ∼96% +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (16.6 - 113, n=136, last 2 years)
74.7 fps ∼95% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (61.9 - 84.6, n=15)
72 fps ∼91% +5%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
69.3 fps ∼88% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
68.7 fps ∼87%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
66.2 fps ∼84% -4%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
64.4 fps ∼82% -6%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
62.2 fps ∼79% -9%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
33.3 fps ∼42% -52%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
2560x1440 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (10.9 - 90.3, n=19, last 2 years)
68.5 fps ∼100% +15%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
65.4 fps ∼95% +10%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost)
64.6 fps ∼94% +8%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
59.6 fps ∼87%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (53.6 - 65.4, n=6)
58.8 fps ∼86% -1%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
53.6 fps ∼78% -10%
1920x1080 High Quality
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
87.2 fps ∼100% +9%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost)
84.7 fps ∼97% +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (15.4 - 115, n=70, last 2 years)
81.5 fps ∼93% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
81.2 fps ∼93% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
79.9 fps ∼92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (68.9 - 87.2, n=12)
76.8 fps ∼88% -4%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
72.5 fps ∼83% -9%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
70.3 fps ∼81% -12%
Schenker XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
57.2 fps ∼66% -28%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
51.1 fps ∼59% -36%
Strange Brigade
2560x1440 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (82.3 - 165, n=16, last 2 years)
127 fps ∼100% +26%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost)
107 (78.6min, 84.6P1 - 184max) fps ∼84% +6%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
107 (74.1min, 82.9P1 - 201max) fps ∼84% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (91.1 - 107, n=4)
102 fps ∼80% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
101 (64.3min, 80.2P1 - 156max) fps ∼80%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (10.9 - 219, n=51, last 2 years)
152 fps ∼100% +13%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
144 (94.8min, 106P1 - 243max) fps ∼95% +7%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost)
142 (99.8min, 108P1 - 238max) fps ∼93% +6%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
141 (76.6min, 107P1 - 221max) fps ∼93% +5%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
134 (89.3min, 99.7P1 - 237max) fps ∼88%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (121 - 144, n=12)
131 fps ∼86% -2%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
124 (84.1min, 93.4P1 - 196max) fps ∼82% -7%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
121 (82.8min, 89.6P1 - 197max) fps ∼80% -10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
95 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (84 - 95, n=3)
88 fps ∼93% -7%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
85 (42min) fps ∼89% -11%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
84 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (29 - 151, n=95, last 2 years)
82.7 fps ∼87% -13%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
79 fps ∼83% -17%
2560x1440 Highest Preset AA:T
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
71 fps ∼100% +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (32 - 98, n=18, last 2 years)
69.6 fps ∼98% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (66 - 71, n=3)
68.3 fps ∼96% +3%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
68 (42min) fps ∼96% +3%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
66 fps ∼93%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
106 (84min - 134max) fps ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
102 (80min - 128max) fps ∼96%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
101 (81min - 126max) fps ∼95% -1%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
98 (75min - 124max) fps ∼92% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (91 - 106, n=9)
97.2 fps ∼92% -5%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
97 (78min - 115max) fps ∼92% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (12 - 146, n=71, last 2 years)
95.5 fps ∼90% -6%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
91 (65min - 110max) fps ∼86% -11%
Schenker XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
83 fps ∼78% -19%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (48 - 111, n=20, last 2 years)
88.6 fps ∼100% +8%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
86 (74min - 98max) fps ∼97% +5%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
84 (71min - 96max) fps ∼95% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
84 (71min - 95max) fps ∼95% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (82 - 86, n=4)
84 fps ∼95% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
82 (73min - 94max) fps ∼93%
GTA V
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
92.5 (9.14min, 62.5P1 - 184max) fps ∼100% +6%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
91.6 (20.2min, 62.5P1 - 183max) fps ∼99% +5%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
89.4 (19.9min, 58.8P1 - 173max) fps ∼97% +3%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
86.9 (19.6min, 58.8P1 - 169max) fps ∼94%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
84.5 (4.51min, 55.6P1 - 164max) fps ∼91% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (69.2 - 92.5, n=13)
82.7 fps ∼89% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (4.18 - 112, n=71, last 2 years)
81.6 fps ∼88% -6%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
74 (5.27min, 47.6P1 - 151max) fps ∼80% -15%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
69.2 (4.86min, 47.6P1 - 137max) fps ∼75% -20%
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (72.7 - 97.4, n=13, last 2 years)
84.5 fps ∼100% +14%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
75.9 (18.2min, 52.6P1 - 142max) fps ∼90% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
75.2 (18.1min, 52.6P1 - 134max) fps ∼89% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
74.3 (18.9min, 50P1 - 127max) fps ∼88%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (63.6 - 75.9, n=4)
72.3 fps ∼86% -3%
Performance Rating - Percent
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 -12!
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
100 pt ∼100%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H) -7!
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
95 pt ∼95%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) -5!
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
94.7 pt ∼95%
Average of class Gaming
 
94.3 pt ∼94%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 -7!
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
93.7 pt ∼94%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) -2!
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
92.5 pt ∼93%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere -6!
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
91.2 pt ∼91%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
90.7 pt ∼91%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
 
89 pt ∼89%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF -6!
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
83.6 pt ∼84%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE -5!
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
79 pt ∼79%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 -11!
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
78.6 pt ∼79%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake -10!
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
77.6 pt ∼78%
Schenker XMG Core 17 -10!
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
67.2 pt ∼67%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK -9!
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
63 pt ∼63%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
92.5 fps ∼100% +16%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
88.5 (77min - 102max) fps ∼96% +11%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
85.7 (38.8min, 41.6P0.1, 55.9P1 - 178max) fps ∼93% +8%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
80.3 (76min - 86max) fps ∼87% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
79.5 (30.1min, 37.6P0.1, 42.6P1 - 167max) fps ∼86%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
79.4 (63min) fps ∼86% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (68.3 - 88.5, n=13)
76.4 fps ∼83% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.3 - 123, n=194, last 2 years)
75 fps ∼81% -6%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
72.9 (62min) fps ∼79% -8%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
68.7 (63min - 74max) fps ∼74% -14%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
68.5 (52min) fps ∼74% -14%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
61 (50min) fps ∼66% -23%
Schenker XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
53.3 fps ∼58% -33%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
42.3 fps ∼46% -47%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
123 (108.1min) fps ∼100% +4%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
121 (104.1min) fps ∼98% +3%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
118 (102.7min) fps ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.6 - 156, n=137, last 2 years)
115 fps ∼93% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (90.7 - 130, n=15)