Notebookcheck

Courte critique de la tablette Chuwi HiPad

Allen Ngo (traduit par Prévots), 01/02/2019

Très bon marché... La Chuwi HiPad se vend pour environ 200 $, avec des spécifications séduisantes comme un écran tactile 1200p, un SoC dix cœurs Helio X27, 3 Go de RAM, et Android 8.0. Mais les performances sont cependant vraiment le reflet de sa catégorie ultra bon marché.

Chuwi HiPad (Hi Gamme)
Carte graphique
Mémoire
3072 Mo 
Écran
10.1 pouces 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPP, IPS, brillant: oui
Disque dur
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 Go 
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: 3.5 mm earphones, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: MicroSD
Réseau
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 9.4 x 252.5 x 163
Batterie
7000 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Android 8.0 Oreo
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 5 MPix
Appareil photo secondaire: 5 MPix
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: Mono, USB Type-C charger, AC adapter, Quick Start guide, fanless
Poids
490 g
Prix
200 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

260 mm 161.1 mm 8 mm 531 g252.5 mm 163 mm 9.4 mm 490 g249 mm 164 mm 7 mm 482 g247 mm 173 mm 7.1 mm 475 g245 mm 175 mm 8.3 mm 523 g243.4 mm 162.2 mm 7.7 mm 475 g
Tous les ports, dont le tiroir pour cartes micro SD, sont logés du même côte (source : Chuwi).
Tous les ports, dont le tiroir pour cartes micro SD, sont logés du même côte (source : Chuwi).
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
581 MBit/s ∼100% +134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
290 MBit/s ∼50% +17%
Chuwi HiPad
802.11a/b/g/n
248 MBit/s ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
216 (min: 49, max: 250) MBit/s ∼37% -13%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
51.7 MBit/s ∼9% -79%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
580 MBit/s ∼100% +197%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
476 MBit/s ∼82% +144%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
312 (min: 291, max: 325) MBit/s ∼54% +60%
Chuwi HiPad
802.11a/b/g/n
195 MBit/s ∼34%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
54.5 MBit/s ∼9% -72%
376.7
cd/m²
397.8
cd/m²
396.9
cd/m²
394.3
cd/m²
408.7
cd/m²
421.1
cd/m²
357.7
cd/m²
407.2
cd/m²
399.9
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 421.1 cd/m² Moyenne: 395.6 cd/m² Minimum: 408.7 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 85 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 408.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 801:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.13 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
Gamma: 2.24
Chuwi HiPad
IPS, 10.1, 1920x1200
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Super AMOLED, 10.5, 2560x1600
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
IPS, 10.5, 1920x1200
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Sharp SHP14A6, IPS, 10, 1800x1200
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
IPS, 10.1, 1920x1200
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
IPS, 10.1, 1920x1200
Response Times
88%
-13%
3%
22%
-18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
33.2 (16.4, 16.8)
4.8 (2.8, 2)
86%
54.8 (24.8, 30)
-65%
44 (22, 22)
-33%
36 (17, 19)
-8%
52 (25, 27)
-57%
Response Time Black / White *
41.2 (25.2, 16)
4 (2, 2)
90%
24.8 (8.4, 16.4)
40%
25.6 (11.6, 14)
38%
20 (9, 11)
51%
32 (17, 15)
22%
PWM Frequency
240.4 (99)
1020 (99)
100 (20)
Screen
26%
39%
43%
-24%
21%
Brightness middle
408.7
474
16%
556
36%
456
12%
514
26%
443
8%
Brightness
396
477
20%
514
30%
426
8%
492
24%
428
8%
Brightness Distribution
85
91
7%
87
2%
88
4%
80
-6%
94
11%
Black Level *
0.51
0.42
18%
0.31
39%
0.96
-88%
0.36
29%
Contrast
801
1324
65%
1471
84%
535
-33%
1231
54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.13
2.5
39%
1.8
56%
1.3
69%
5.42
-31%
3.3
20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.34
5.8
21%
3.2
56%
3
59%
9.84
-34%
7.2
2%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.4
2.1
52%
2.2
50%
1.4
68%
6.5
-48%
2.9
34%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.08 106%
2.26 97%
2.24 98%
2.216 99%
2.27 97%
CCT
7389 88%
6281 103%
6819 95%
6687 97%
6780 96%
6961 93%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.1
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62.3
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96.8
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
57% / 41%
13% / 29%
23% / 35%
-1% / -15%
2% / 13%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
41.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 25.2 ms hausse
↘ 16 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (25.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
33.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 16.4 ms hausse
↘ 16.8 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (40.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 52 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9868 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7930 Points ∼18% +118%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
3685 Points ∼8% +1%
Chuwi HiPad
3643 Points ∼8%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (2843 - 3685, n=4)
3444 Points ∼8% -5%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3235 Points ∼7% -11%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3148 Points ∼7% -14%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3081 Points ∼7% -15%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6477 Points ∼18% +28%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
6173 Points ∼17% +22%
Apple iPad 6 2018
5952 Points ∼16% +18%
Chuwi HiPad
5064 Points ∼14%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
4636 Points ∼13% -8%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (3590 - 5064, n=4)
4554 Points ∼13% -10%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
4323 Points ∼12% -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
3846 Points ∼11% -24%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3805 Points ∼11% -25%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
2489 Points ∼7% -51%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad 6 2018
3499 Points ∼55% +95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
1893 Points ∼30% +5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
1892 Points ∼30% +5%
Chuwi HiPad
1797 Points ∼28%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1641 Points ∼26% -9%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (1352 - 1797, n=4)
1632 Points ∼26% -9%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1541 Points ∼24% -14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
940 Points ∼15% -48%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
868 Points ∼14% -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
745 Points ∼12% -59%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6315 Points ∼61% +45%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
6039 Points ∼59% +39%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
4827 Points ∼47% +11%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
4719 Points ∼46% +8%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
4626 Points ∼45% +6%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (4077 - 4695, n=4)
4427 Points ∼43% +2%
Chuwi HiPad
4354 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
4171 Points ∼40% -4%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
4077 Points ∼40% -6%
Work performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6954 Points ∼51% +27%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
6830 Points ∼50% +25%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5843 Points ∼43% +7%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
5648 Points ∼42% +3%
Chuwi HiPad
5463 Points ∼40%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (4922 - 5984, n=4)
5353 Points ∼40% -2%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
4922 Points ∼36% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
4914 Points ∼36% -10%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2919 Points ∼66%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2405 Points ∼54%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1804 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1768 Points ∼40%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1632 Points ∼37%
Apple iPad 6 2018
1627 Points ∼37%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (1372 - 1804, n=3)
1626 Points ∼37%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
650 Points ∼15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
4086 Points ∼50%
Apple iPad 6 2018
3852 Points ∼47%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
1885 Points ∼23%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (930 - 1108, n=3)
1003 Points ∼12%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
972 Points ∼12%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
506 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
413 Points ∼5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
399 Points ∼5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3753 Points ∼72%
Apple iPad 6 2018
2955 Points ∼57%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
1980 Points ∼38%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (1034 - 1157, n=3)
1091 Points ∼21%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1083 Points ∼21%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
532 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
498 Points ∼10%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
480 Points ∼9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2952 Points ∼63%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2210 Points ∼47%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1871 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1766 Points ∼38%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (1547 - 1871, n=2)
1709 Points ∼36%
Apple iPad 6 2018
1690 Points ∼36%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1648 Points ∼35%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
744 Points ∼16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad 6 2018
7253 Points ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3682 Points ∼13%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2466 Points ∼9%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1133 Points ∼4%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (1071 - 1133, n=2)
1102 Points ∼4%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
812 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
712 Points ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
602 Points ∼2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Apple iPad 6 2018
4190 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3753 Points ∼28%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2404 Points ∼18%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1242 Points ∼9%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (1150 - 1242, n=2)
1196 Points ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
821 Points ∼6%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
796 Points ∼6%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
701 Points ∼5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2952 Points ∼70% +64%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2416 Points ∼57% +34%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
1991 Points ∼47% +10%
Chuwi HiPad
1803 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1775 Points ∼42% -2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1744 Points ∼41% -3%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (1654 - 1803, n=4)
1695 Points ∼40% -6%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1654 Points ∼39% -8%
Apple iPad 6 2018
1439 Points ∼34% -20%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
843 Points ∼20% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad 6 2018
3682 Points ∼68% +483%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3682 Points ∼68% +483%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
1646 Points ∼31% +160%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (626 - 995, n=4)
786 Points ∼15% +24%
Chuwi HiPad
632 Points ∼12%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
626 Points ∼12% -1%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
557 Points ∼10% -12%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
381 Points ∼7% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
363 Points ∼7% -43%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
193 Points ∼4% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3490 Points ∼74% +372%
Apple iPad 6 2018
2735 Points ∼58% +270%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
1771 Points ∼37% +140%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (726 - 1092, n=4)
888 Points ∼19% +20%
Chuwi HiPad
739 Points ∼16%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
726 Points ∼15% -2%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
602 Points ∼13% -19%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
464 Points ∼10% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
441 Points ∼9% -40%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
241 Points ∼5% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2952 Points ∼70% +65%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2366 Points ∼56% +33%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
2031 Points ∼48% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1802 Points ∼43% +1%
Chuwi HiPad
1785 Points ∼42%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1758 Points ∼42% -2%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1714 Points ∼41% -4%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (1610 - 1785, n=3)
1703 Points ∼40% -5%
Apple iPad 6 2018
1535 Points ∼36% -14%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1128 Points ∼27% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad 6 2018
6095 Points ∼73% +562%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3682 Points ∼44% +300%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2392 Points ∼29% +160%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (890 - 1103, n=3)
971 Points ∼12% +5%
Chuwi HiPad
921 Points ∼11%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
890 Points ∼11% -3%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
884 Points ∼11% -4%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
731 Points ∼9% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
696 Points ∼8% -24%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
99 Points ∼1% -89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Apple iPad 6 2018
3672 Points ∼57% +256%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3490 Points ∼54% +238%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2386 Points ∼37% +131%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (996 - 1186, n=3)
1071 Points ∼17% +4%
Chuwi HiPad
1032 Points ∼16%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
996 Points ∼15% -3%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
929 Points ∼14% -10%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
852 Points ∼13% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
806 Points ∼12% -22%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
125 Points ∼2% -88%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
20366 Points ∼24% +63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
19037 Points ∼22% +53%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
15850 Points ∼18% +27%
Apple iPad 6 2018
15499 Points ∼18% +24%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
14456 Points ∼17% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
14147 Points ∼16% +14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
13310 Points ∼15% +7%
Chuwi HiPad
12462 Points ∼14%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
11203 Points ∼13% -10%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (9771 - 12462, n=4)
10915 Points ∼13% -12%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
9729 Points ∼11% -22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad 6 2018
62626 Points ∼12% +291%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
57024 Points ∼11% +256%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
56368 Points ∼11% +252%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
35076 Points ∼7% +119%
Chuwi HiPad
16016 Points ∼3%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (14192 - 17173, n=4)
15766 Points ∼3% -2%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
15682 Points ∼3% -2%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
13239 Points ∼2% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
12323 Points ∼2% -23%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11719 Points ∼2% -27%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
11419 Points ∼2% -29%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
40731 Points ∼17% +170%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
39260 Points ∼17% +161%
Apple iPad 6 2018
37372 Points ∼16% +148%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
26634 Points ∼11% +77%
Chuwi HiPad
15061 Points ∼6%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
14402 Points ∼6% -4%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (12895 - 15061, n=4)
14319 Points ∼6% -5%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
13742 Points ∼6% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
12686 Points ∼5% -16%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
11791 Points ∼5% -22%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11209 Points ∼5% -26%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad 6 2018
125 fps ∼1% +221%
Apple iPad 6 2018
118 fps ∼1% +203%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
93 fps ∼1% +138%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
69 fps ∼1% +77%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
39 fps ∼0% 0%
Chuwi HiPad
39 fps ∼0%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (32 - 39, n=4)
37.3 fps ∼0% -4%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
23 fps ∼0% -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
21 fps ∼0% -46%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
20 fps ∼0% -49%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
18 fps ∼0% -54%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad 6 2018
59.7 fps ∼2% +76%
Apple iPad 6 2018
59 fps ∼2% +74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
58 fps ∼2% +71%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
57 fps ∼2% +68%
Chuwi HiPad
34 fps ∼1%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (25 - 35, n=4)
31.8 fps ∼1% -6%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
25 fps ∼1% -26%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
20 fps ∼1% -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
20 fps ∼1% -41%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
19 fps ∼1% -44%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
17 fps ∼1% -50%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Apple iPad 6 2018
62.6 fps ∼1% +229%
Apple iPad 6 2018
58.9 fps ∼1% +210%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
60 fps ∼1% +216%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
41 fps ∼1% +116%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
19 fps ∼0% 0%
Chuwi HiPad
19 fps ∼0%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (16 - 19, n=4)
18.3 fps ∼0% -4%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
9.8 fps ∼0% -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
9.2 fps ∼0% -52%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
8.8 fps ∼0% -54%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.5 fps ∼0% -55%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad 6 2018
40.9 fps ∼1% +115%
Apple iPad 6 2018
40.3 fps ∼1% +112%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
36 fps ∼1% +89%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
27 fps ∼1% +42%
Chuwi HiPad
19 fps ∼1%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (11 - 19, n=4)
17 fps ∼0% -11%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
11 fps ∼0% -42%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
9.2 fps ∼0% -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
8.8 fps ∼0% -54%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
8.6 fps ∼0% -55%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.3 fps ∼0% -56%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
42.7 fps ∼1% +228%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
41 fps ∼1% +215%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
28 fps ∼1% +115%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
13 fps ∼0% 0%
Chuwi HiPad
13 fps ∼0%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (12 - 13, n=4)
12.8 fps ∼0% -2%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
6.4 fps ∼0% -51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
6.1 fps ∼0% -53%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6 fps ∼0% -54%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
5.4 fps ∼0% -58%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
27.3 fps ∼1% +128%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
22 fps ∼1% +83%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
16 fps ∼0% +33%
Chuwi HiPad
12 fps ∼0%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (6.2 - 13, n=4)
10.8 fps ∼0% -10%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
6.2 fps ∼0% -48%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
6 fps ∼0% -50%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5.7 fps ∼0% -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
5.7 fps ∼0% -52%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
5.3 fps ∼0% -56%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
12.3 fps ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
8.9 fps ∼15%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
2.4 fps ∼4%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X
2.4 fps ∼4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1.7 fps ∼3%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
10.8 fps ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
9.3 fps ∼18%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
2.5 fps ∼5%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X
2.5 fps ∼5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1.1 fps ∼2%
Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
20 fps ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
14 fps ∼23%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
3.8 fps ∼6%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X
3.8 fps ∼6%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
2.7 fps ∼5%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
30.8 fps ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
25 fps ∼19%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
7.2 fps ∼5%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X
7.2 fps ∼5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
2.8 fps ∼2%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
26.8 fps ∼1% +267%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
25 fps ∼1% +242%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
16 fps ∼0% +119%
Chuwi HiPad
7.3 fps ∼0%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
7.2 fps ∼0% -1%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (6.8 - 7.3, n=4)
7.15 fps ∼0% -2%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3.5 fps ∼0% -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
3.4 fps ∼0% -53%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3.2 fps ∼0% -56%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3 fps ∼0% -59%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
17.9 fps ∼1% +142%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
13 fps ∼0% +76%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
9.3 fps ∼0% +26%
Chuwi HiPad
7.4 fps ∼0%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (4 - 7.4, n=4)
6.5 fps ∼0% -12%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
4 fps ∼0% -46%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3.3 fps ∼0% -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
3.3 fps ∼0% -55%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3.1 fps ∼0% -58%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3 fps ∼0% -59%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
21.79 (min: 12.48, max: 36) fps ∼3%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X
3.59 fps ∼1%
Vulkan Medium Native
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
14.78 (min: 9.16, max: 37.68) fps ∼2%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
22.71 (min: 13.73, max: 55.41) fps ∼3%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
201881 Points ∼36% +88%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
175581 Points ∼31% +64%
Apple iPad 6 2018
170921 Points ∼30% +59%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
110854 Points ∼20% +3%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (105872 - 110854, n=4)
107962 Points ∼19% +1%
Chuwi HiPad
107201 Points ∼19%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
86908 Points ∼15% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
70431 Points ∼12% -34%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 6 2018
27967 Points ∼56% +363%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
12897 Points ∼26% +113%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
11875 Points ∼24% +96%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
11854 Points ∼24% +96%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8897 Points ∼18% +47%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (5909 - 9798, n=4)
6943 Points ∼14% +15%
Chuwi HiPad
6046 Points ∼12%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
6017 Points ∼12% 0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
5412 Points ∼11% -10%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
4502 Points ∼9% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
4078 Points ∼8% -33%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad 6 2018
167.2 Points ∼50% +441%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
86.989 Points ∼26% +181%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
65.07 Points ∼19% +111%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
57.007 Points ∼17% +84%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
47.337 Points ∼14% +53%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (29.9 - 48.9, n=4)
35 Points ∼10% +13%
Chuwi HiPad
30.911 Points ∼9%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
29.934 Points ∼9% -3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
29.598 Points ∼9% -4%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
25.761 Points ∼8% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
22.084 Points ∼7% -29%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
11529.2 ms * ∼19% -17%
Chuwi HiPad
9850.9 ms * ∼17%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
9248.9 ms * ∼16% +6%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
9236.5 ms * ∼16% +6%
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X (4261 - 9851, n=4)
7150 ms * ∼12% +27%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
7059 ms * ∼12% +28%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3756.1 ms * ∼6% +62%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
3575.4 ms * ∼6% +64%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
3077.3 ms * ∼5% +69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2644.7 ms * ∼4% +73%
Apple iPad 6 2018
1025.5 ms * ∼2% +90%

Légende

 
Chuwi HiPad MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 Mediatek MT8176, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPad 6 2018 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 32 GB NVMe
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Chuwi Hi9 Plus MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Chuwi HiPad
32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
32 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
32 GB eMMC Flash
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
64 GB eMMC Flash
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
64 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
163%
43%
149%
33%
-4%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
66.81
59.08
-12%
60.39
-10%
72.8
9%
61.1
-9%
20.44
-69%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
65.93
80.07
21%
80.6
22%
83.7
27%
83.9
27%
21.16
-68%
Random Write 4KB
10.28
24.43
138%
13.39
30%
77.25
651%
11.8
15%
13.01
27%
Random Read 4KB
40.21
141.96
253%
71.13
77%
73.47
83%
37.3
-7%
42.2
5%
Sequential Write 256KB
73.55
195.76
166%
103.32
40%
82.56
12%
135.5
84%
132.47
80%
Sequential Read 256KB
144.33
740.54
413%
285.63
98%
308.15
114%
270.1
87%
144.97
0%

» No benchmarks for this notebook found!

 36 °C25 °C24 °C 
 34.6 °C25 °C23.8 °C 
 31.2 °C24.8 °C23.4 °C 
Maximum: 36 °C
Moyenne: 27.5 °C
25 °C27 °C31.4 °C
25 °C26.2 °C32 °C
25 °C26.4 °C29.2 °C
Maximum: 32 °C
Moyenne: 27.5 °C
Température ambiante de la pièce 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34.8 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.3 to 51.8 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.638.3253333.33134.231.34029.831.15031.832.56331.930.78029.12910028.828.21253130.316028.628.720026.527.525024.930.231525.338.740024.648.250023.756.763022.566.280022.168.4100021.964.1125021.456.8160021.357.1200021.152.7250020.847.8315020.954.8400020.961.7500020.961.7630020.762.7800020.861.41000020.956.31250020.6501600020.648.2SPL33.873.2N2.129.6median 21.4median 54.8Delta2.111.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseChuwi HiPadApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Chuwi HiPad audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.44 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (17.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 1.4 / 1.6 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 2.7 / 5.5 / 5.6 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 7 / 12.2 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Chuwi HiPad
MT6797X, Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
835, Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
450, Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.5
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1800x1200, 10
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
625, Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Power Consumption
31%
33%
-53%
27%
36%
Idle Minimum *
2.7
1.76
35%
1.26
53%
2.88
-7%
2.8
-4%
1.23
54%
Idle Average *
5.5
4.22
23%
4.22
23%
4.8
13%
3.3
40%
3.92
29%
Idle Maximum *
5.6
4.25
24%
4.29
23%
7.5
-34%
3.9
30%
4.03
28%
Load Average *
7
4.52
35%
5.48
22%
16.9
-141%
5.2
26%
5
29%
Load Maximum *
12.2
7.35
40%
6.57
46%
23.8
-95%
7.2
41%
7.09
42%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 16min
Chuwi HiPad
MT6797X, Mali-T880 MP4,  Wh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
835, Adreno 540,  Wh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
450, Adreno 506,  Wh
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 28 Wh
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2,  Wh
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
625, Adreno 506, 26.6 Wh
Autonomie de la batterie
-20%
52%
-27%
38%
5%
Reader / Idle
1227
1960
771
2162
1625
WiFi v1.3
616
495
-20%
938
52%
448
-27%
852
38%
647
5%
Load
245
385
180
299
256

Points positifs

+ bonnes couleurs et bon contraste pour le prix
+ écran tactile IPS 16:10 1920 x 1200
+ bonne qualité du châssis pour le prix
+ autonomie honnête
+ lecteur micro SD
+ bon marché
+ Android 8.0

Points négatifs

- temps de réponse lents du noir au blanc et du gris au gris
- haut-parleurs, manque de basses
- performances
- charge lente
- photographie
- GPU
- pas de GPS
En test : la Chuwi HiPad. Modèle de test fourni par Chuwi.
En test : la Chuwi HiPad. Modèle de test fourni par Chuwi.

N’en attendons pas trop pour 200 $. Un appareil fluide, un châssis robuste et un bel écran sont peut-être les trois demandes les plus importantes pour une tablette bon marché "parfaite". Dans le cas de Chuwi, la HiPad réussit dans deux de ces trois catégories.

Le châssis en métal est peut-être le point fore de la HiPad. Sa compacité et son esthétique de gamer noire et rouge donnent l’impression d’une tablette plus chère. L’écran tactile IPS en verre est également supérieur à la moyenne en ce qui concerne la fidélité des couleurs et le contraste.

Ce sont les performances qui font défaut à la HiPad. Des actions pourtant simples comme le défilement de pages ou le lancement d’applications causent des ralentissements que l’on ne trouve plus sur les tablettes ou smartphones classiques - c’est là que l’on retrouve le côté "bon marché" de la machine. D’autres fonctionnalités en retrait, comme l’appareil photo, les haut-parleurs ou la charge lente sont acceptables à ce prix, mais des performances plus fluides auraient vraiment permis une meilleure expérience globale. Heureusement, la tablette fera l’affaire pour regarder des films en FHD, et pour un peu de navigation web - ce que recherche principalement la clientèle-cible de la tablette.

L’écran est meilleur qu’attendu en ce qui concerne les couleurs et le contraste, pour ce prix. Le faible taux d’image et les performances à la traîne gâchent cette tablette Android par ailleurs réussie.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Chuwi HiPad - 01/02/2019 v6
Allen Ngo

Châssis
74%
Clavier
60 / 80 → 75%
Dispositif de pointage
50%
Connectivité
18 / 65 → 28%
Poids
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Autonomie
93%
Écran
81%
Performances en jeu
53 / 68 → 78%
Performances dans les applications
48 / 76 → 64%
Chauffe
95%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
30 / 91 → 33%
Appareil photo
29 / 85 → 34%
Moyenne
63%
75%
Tablet - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique de la tablette Chuwi HiPad
Allen Ngo, 2019-01- 2 (Update: 2019-01- 2)