Courte critique du PC portable de jeu Asus RoG Zephyrus S GX531GM (i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD, SSD)

Original. Asus intègre la technologie du Zephyrus S dans un châssis fin et compact. Ses composants sont capables de faire tourner tous les jeux actuels de façon fluide sur l’écran IPS 144 Hz. Mais l’appareil est peu évolutif.

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (traduit par Prévots), 01/07/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Exemplaire de test fourni par notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM (ROG Zephyrus S GX531 Gamme)

Processeur

Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Carte graphique

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6144 Mo, Processeur: 1671 MHz, Mémoire: 2002 MHz, GDDR5, 192 Bit, Nvidia 399.24, Optimus

Mémoire

16384 Mo

, DDR4-2666MHz, double canal, deux emplacements, 8 Go soudés, maximum 24 Go

Écran

15.60 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPP, AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 144 Hz, brillant: non

Carte mère

Intel HM370

Disque dur

Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, 512 Go

, 438 Go libres

Carte son

Realtek ALC294 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connexions

2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: Audiokombo, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: SDXC, TPM 2.0

Réseau

Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0

Taille

Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 15.75 x 360 x 268

Batterie

53 Wh Lithium-Ion

Système d'exploitation

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Appareil photo

Webcam: HD
Appareil photo primaire: 0.9 MPix

Fonctionnalités additionnelles

Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, McAfee LiveSafe (version d'essai), XSplit Gamecaster, 24 Mois Garantie

Poids

2.1 kg, Alimentation: 553 g

Prix

2 100 Euro

Liens

Asus Page d'accueil
Asus Section dédiée aux ordinateurs portables

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

voir toutes les spécifications

Comparaison des tailles

HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Schenker XMG Neo 15 MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Razer Blade 15 Base Model ❌

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Wireless-AC 9560	693 MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	665 MBit/s ∼96% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model Intel Wireless-AC 9260	653 MBit/s ∼94% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Wireless-AC 9560	650 (456^min - 801^max) MBit/s ∼94%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560	650 (605^min - 668^max) MBit/s ∼94% 0%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US Intel Wireless-AC 9560	633 MBit/s ∼91% -3%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	694 MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Wireless-AC 9560	683 MBit/s ∼98% +6%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US Intel Wireless-AC 9560	666 MBit/s ∼96% +3%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model Intel Wireless-AC 9260	666 MBit/s ∼96% +3%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560	650 (569^min - 693^max) MBit/s ∼94% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Wireless-AC 9560	646 (611^min - 665^max) MBit/s ∼93%

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø646 (611-665)

HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø649 (569-693)

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (456-801)

HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (605-668)


307 cd/m²	300 cd/m²	299 cd/m²
317 cd/m²	323 cd/m²	309 cd/m²
306 cd/m²	316 cd/m²	306 cd/m²

Homogénéité de la luminosité

AU Optronics B156HAN08.2

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 323 cd/m² (Nits) Moyenne: 309.2 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 93 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 325 cd/m²
Contraste: 1114:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.33 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 4.12 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.78% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.13% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.91% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43

Download Profil ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	HP Omen 15-dc0015ng IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Schenker XMG Neo 15 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Razer Blade 15 Base Model IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		1%	1%	-2%	2%	2%
Display P3 Coverage	64.91	64.18 -1%	64.35 -1%	66.29 2%	65.84 1%	66.74 3%
sRGB Coverage	90.13	93.41 4%	94.14 4%	86.57 -4%	92.09 2%	91.16 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	65.78	65.13 -1%	65.32 -1%	63.26 -4%	67.04 2%	66.69 1%
Response Times		-72%	-58%	-340%	-98%	2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	7 ?(4, 3)	17 ?(9, 8) -143%	16 ?(8.4, 7.6) -129%	39.2 ?(19.6, 19.6) -460%	20 ?(10, 10) -186%	7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6) -6%
Response Time Black / White *	11 ?(6, 5)	11 ?(7, 4) -0%	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) 13%	35.2 ?(20.4, 14.8) -220%	12 ?(6.8, 5.2) -9%	10 ?(4.4, 5.6) 9%
PWM Frequency				21190 ?(99)
Screen		-8%	9%	3%	-2%	12%
Brightness middle	323	317 -2%	325 1%	273.6 -15%	250.9 -22%	294 -9%
Brightness	309	283 -8%	303 -2%	262 -15%	257 -17%	275 -11%
Brightness Distribution	93	76 -18%	90 -3%	86 -8%	83 -11%	84 -10%
Black Level *	0.29	0.62 -114%	0.33 -14%	0.3 -3%	0.32 -10%	0.24 17%
Contrast	1114	511 -54%	985 -12%	912 -18%	784 -30%	1225 10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.33	2.83 35%	2.69 38%	3.22 26%	2.77 36%	2.57 41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.64	5.78 24%	4.91 36%	7.61 -0%	5.89 23%	4.88 36%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.12	2 51%	2.34 43%	1.4 66%	4 3%	2.41 42%
Gamma	2.43 ^91%	2.28 ^96%	2.38 ^92%	2.24 ^98%	2.27 ^97%	2.5 ^88%
CCT	7427 ^88%	6493 ^100%	6872 ^95%	6636 ^98%	6901 ^94%	6370 ^102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	59	60 2%	60 2%	56.4 -4%	60 2%	59 0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	90	93 3%	94 4%	86.2 -4%	92 2%	91 1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *			1.27	4.1	2.5	2.14
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)		-26% / -15%	-16% / -1%	-113% / -44%	-33% / -14%	5% / 8%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 52 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 21090 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 3846000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.

↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc
11 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 6 ms hausse
11 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 5 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (23.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
7 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 4 ms hausse
7 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 3 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (37.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø985 (977.23-1096.32)

HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø983 (970.71-1067.24)

Schenker XMG Neo 15 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1104 (1087.93-1138.69)

Razer Blade 15 Base Model Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø864 (856.88-926.63)

MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø991 (974.33-1083.86)

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1004 (937.73-1119.73)

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H; Turbo-Modus: Ø1109 (1100.35-1209.34)

Fréquence du processeur de l'Asus ROG Zephyrus S durant la boucle Cinebench 15. — Fréquence du processeur durant la boucle Cinebench 15.

Fréquence du processeur de l'Asus ROG Zephyrus S durant la boucle Cinebench 15 (mode Turbo). — Fréquence du processeur durant la boucle Cinebench 15 (mode Turbo).

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6416

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

32791

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6810

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

168 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1096 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

88.23 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Aide

... en comparaison

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (108 - 254, n=194, last 2 years)	204 Points ∼71% +21%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points ∼61% +4%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points ∼61% +4%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	172 Points ∼60% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (163 - 177, n=86)	172 Points ∼60% +2%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	169 Points ∼59% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H	168 Points ∼59%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H (Turbo-Modus)	168 Points ∼59% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H	166 Points ∼58% -1%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (536 - 2804, n=205, last 2 years)	1622 Points ∼17% +48%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H (Turbo-Modus)	1209 Points ∼12% +10%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	1154 Points ∼12% +5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H	1120 Points ∼12% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (863 - 1251, n=93)	1113 Points ∼11% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H	1096 Points ∼11%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US Intel Core i7-8750H	1083 Points ∼11% -1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	1067 Points ∼11% -3%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model Intel Core i7-8750H	923 Points ∼10% -16%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (6236 - 6645, n=25)	6479 Points ∼58% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	6473 Points ∼58% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H	6416 Points ∼57%
Average of class Gaming (4527 - 8663, n=21, last 2 years)	6373 Points ∼57% -1%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average of class Gaming (19290 - 44805, n=21, last 2 years)	34062 Points ∼47% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (29664 - 35307, n=25)	33163 Points ∼45% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H	32791 Points ∼45%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	31360 Points ∼43% -4%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H	22650 Points ∼28%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	22587 Points ∼28% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (20725 - 22665, n=13)	21871 Points ∼27% -3%
Average of class Gaming (14478 - 21308, n=3, last 2 years)	16967 Points ∼21% -25%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	4144 Points ∼85% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H	3998 Points ∼82%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (3734 - 4163, n=13)	3995 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Gaming (3558 - 4137, n=3, last 2 years)	3804 Points ∼78% -5%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming (20939 - 41058, n=5, last 2 years)	29589 Points ∼72% +41%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	21175 Points ∼52% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H	20975 Points ∼51%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (17048 - 22006, n=8)	19665 Points ∼48% -6%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Gaming (4605 - 6013, n=5, last 2 years)	5485 Points ∼85% +12%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	4997 Points ∼77% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H	4883 Points ∼76%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (4548 - 4997, n=8)	4839 Points ∼75% -1%

Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming (13441 - 40720, n=44, last 2 years)	26730 Points ∼33% +20%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	22614 Points ∼28% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H	22276 Points ∼27%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (17709 - 23313, n=17)	21069 Points ∼26% -5%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Gaming (3938 - 6411, n=44, last 2 years)	5506 Points ∼64% +10%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	5126 Points ∼59% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H	4995 Points ∼58%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (4669 - 5146, n=17)	4982 Points ∼57% 0%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming (205 - 348, n=31, last 2 years)	269 Points ∼65% +8%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US Intel Core i7-8750H (Microsoft Edge 42.17134.1.0)	255.67 Points ∼62% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)	249.3 Points ∼60%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (205 - 299, n=49)	247 Points ∼60% -1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)	241.85 Points ∼58% -3%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)	205.22 Points ∼50% -18%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4560 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5294 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5579 points
PCMark 10 Score		5102 points
Aide

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming (3952 - 7884, n=171, last 2 years)	6160 Points ∼70% +21%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	5728 Points ∼65% +12%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB	5191 Points ∼59% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5170 Points ∼59% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (4646 - 5525, n=14)	5132 Points ∼58% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5102 Points ∼58%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	4896 Points ∼56% -4%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	4646 Points ∼53% -9%
Essentials
Average of class Gaming (7148 - 11064, n=170, last 2 years)	9657 Points ∼84% +13%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	9270 Points ∼81% +8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	8770 Points ∼76% +3%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB	8712 Points ∼76% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	8577 Points ∼75% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	8553 Points ∼74%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (7200 - 9101, n=14)	8386 Points ∼73% -2%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	7200 Points ∼63% -16%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming (5813 - 10066, n=170, last 2 years)	8352 Points ∼75% +17%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	7532 Points ∼67% +6%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	7162 Points ∼64% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (6917 - 7592, n=14)	7154 Points ∼64% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	7125 Points ∼64%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB	7030 Points ∼63% -1%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	6938 Points ∼62% -3%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	6855 Points ∼61% -4%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (3670 - 12250, n=170, last 2 years)	7989 Points ∼51% +35%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	7303 Points ∼47% +23%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB	6200 Points ∼40% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (5452 - 6828, n=14)	6127 Points ∼39% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5970 Points ∼38% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5917 Points ∼38%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	5452 Points ∼35% -8%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	5417 Points ∼35% -8%

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	5130 Points ∼82% +13%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	4676 Points ∼74% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4620 Points ∼74% +1%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB	4585 Points ∼73% +1%
Average of class Gaming (2832 - 6277, n=81, last 2 years)	4564 Points ∼73% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4560 Points ∼73%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (4119 - 5371, n=15)	4511 Points ∼72% -1%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	4425 Points ∼70% -3%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8

Sequential Read: 1251 MB/s

Sequential Write: 972 MB/s

512K Read: 804.9 MB/s

512K Write: 834.4 MB/s

4K Read: 54.03 MB/s

4K Write: 121.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 340.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 451.6 MB/s

	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	Schenker XMG Neo 15 Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB	Razer Blade 15 Base Model Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	Average Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Average of class Gaming
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-6%	44%	32%	25%	7%	12%	84%
Write 4K	100.8	87.51 -13%	100.5 0%	112.5 12%	91.46 -9%	98.17 -3%	134 ?(93.1 - 203, n=31) 33%	151 ?(67.3 - 296, n=160, last 2 years) 50%
Read 4K	48.75	16.08 -67%	48.64 0%	43.09 -12%	40.41 -17%	39.43 -19%	53.8 ?(39.7 - 65.3, n=31) 10%	54.1 ?(27.6 - 148, n=160, last 2 years) 11%
Write Seq	975.1	614.2 -37%	1456 49%	1450 49%	1528 57%	1386 42%	959 ?(872 - 986, n=31) -2%	2273 ?(459 - 5268, n=154, last 2 years) 133%
Read Seq	1344	1341 0%	1278 -5%	1392 4%	1235 -8%	1100 -18%	1511 ?(1291 - 1651, n=31) 12%	2225 ?(539 - 5378, n=154, last 2 years) 66%
Write 4K Q32T1	283.7	307.9 9%	298.1 5%	356.1 26%	259 -9%	270.3 -5%	379 ?(210 - 547, n=31) 34%	471 ?(278 - 746, n=160, last 2 years) 66%
Read 4K Q32T1	330.3	358.4 9%	348.7 6%	406.9 23%	364.9 10%	340.3 3%	330 ?(212 - 346, n=31) 0%	525 ?(298 - 966, n=160, last 2 years) 59%
Write Seq Q32T1	986.3	525.2 -47%	2742 178%	1451 47%	1529 55%	1454 47%	974 ?(920 - 987, n=31) -1%	2656 ?(436 - 5862, n=160, last 2 years) 169%
Read Seq Q32T1	1579	3077 95%	3389 115%	3272 107%	3472 120%	1681 6%	1736 ?(1390 - 1883, n=31) 10%	3484 ?(561 - 9006, n=160, last 2 years) 121%
AS SSD		12%	144%	51%	25%	60%	4%	105%
Seq Read	1315.15	2432.33 85%	1914.52 46%	1802.55 37%	1612.2 23%	903.24 -31%	1409 ?(907 - 1705, n=32) 7%	2604 ?(252 - 5739, n=162, last 2 years) 98%
Seq Write	893.92	842.61 -6%	2323.76 160%	1366.97 53%	1474.76 65%	1260.72 41%	819 ?(374 - 931, n=32) -8%	2155 ?(308 - 5210, n=162, last 2 years) 141%
4K Read	48.49	21.24 -56%	48.03 -1%	40.75 -16%	43.09 -11%	40.02 -17%	49.9 ?(40.1 - 58.5, n=32) 3%	48.8 ?(20 - 82.2, n=162, last 2 years) 1%
4K Write	106.17	99.28 -6%	105.97 0%	92.98 -12%	83.83 -21%	103.63 -2%	122 ?(87 - 182, n=32) 15%	125 ?(18 - 261, n=162, last 2 years) 18%
4K-64 Read	326.24	729.91 124%	1597.87 390%	748.68 129%	610.88 87%	1030.22 216%	323 ?(320 - 326, n=32) -1%	1350 ?(216 - 2959, n=162, last 2 years) 314%
4K-64 Write	652.63	484.41 -26%	2085.05 219%	1269.69 95%	570.49 -13%	1285.25 97%	716 ?(94.1 - 835, n=32) 10%	1647 ?(94.1 - 3859, n=162, last 2 years) 152%
Access Time Read *	0.174	0.126 28%	0.038 78%	0.113 35%	0.071 59%	0.129 26%	0.0903 ?(0.048 - 0.24, n=32) 48%	0.0705 ?(0.018 - 0.23, n=155, last 2 years) 59%
Access Time Write *	0.045	0.063 -40%	0.034 24%	0.04 11%	0.045 -0%	0.036 20%	0.072 ?(0.044 - 0.144, n=32) -60%	0.072 ?(0.015 - 0.588, n=162, last 2 years) -60%
Score Read	506	994 96%	1837 263%	970 92%	815 61%	1161 129%	513 ?(459 - 548, n=32) 1%	1660 ?(389 - 3587, n=162, last 2 years) 228%
Score Write	848	668 -21%	2423 186%	1499 77%	802 -5%	1515 79%	920 ?(285 - 1083, n=32) 8%	1977 ?(285 - 4414, n=162, last 2 years) 133%
Score Total	1611	2091 30%	5224 224%	2952 83%	2039 27%	3294 104%	1687 ?(1077 - 1901, n=32) 5%	4480 ?(910 - 9134, n=162, last 2 years) 178%
Copy ISO MB/s	1221.77	1632.25 34%		1891.98 55%			1090 ?(566 - 1707, n=28) -11%	1953 ?(278 - 3474, n=112, last 2 years) 60%
Copy Program MB/s	354.12	30.89 -91%		495.54 40%			483 ?(163 - 852, n=28) 36%	634 ?(43.1 - 2694, n=112, last 2 years) 79%
Copy Game MB/s	795.79	980.13 23%		1069.77 34%			768 ?(104 - 971, n=28) -3%	1299 ?(104 - 5984, n=112, last 2 years) 63%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)		3% / 6%	94% / 102%	42% / 44%	25% / 25%	34% / 38%	8% / 7%	95% / 97%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX531GM - Sky Diver. — Sky Diver.

Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX531GM - Fire Strike. — Fire Strike.

Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX531GM - Time Spy. — Time Spy.

Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX531GM - Sky Diver (mode Turbo). — Sky Diver (mode Turbo).

Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX531GM - Fire Strike (mode Turbo). — Fire Strike (mode Turbo).

Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX531GM - Time Spy (mode Turbo). — Time Spy (mode Turbo).

3DMark 11 Performance		11509 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		31179 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		10131 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		3795 points
Aide

... en comparaison

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1925 - 43077, n=185, last 2 years)	26934 Points ∼100% +113%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	19187 Points ∼71% +52%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	18296 Points ∼68% +45%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	14879 Points ∼55% +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (12620 - 15607, n=77)	14692 Points ∼55% +16%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H (Turbo-Modus)	14676 Points ∼54% +16%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	14367 Points ∼53% +14%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	14351 Points ∼53% +14%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	12620 Points ∼47%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (1360 - 34993, n=195, last 2 years)	20274 Points ∼100% +79%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	14724 Points ∼73% +30%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	11814 Points ∼58% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H (Turbo-Modus)	11798 Points ∼58% +4%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	11558 Points ∼57% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (10708 - 12298, n=77)	11547 Points ∼57% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	11366 Points ∼56% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	11332 Points ∼56%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming (23059 - 192950, n=157, last 2 years)	104858 Points ∼100% +30%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	101453 Points ∼97% +26%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	83747 Points ∼80% +4%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	81720 Points ∼78% +1%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	81178 Points ∼77% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	80615 Points ∼77%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (26770 - 86193, n=68)	71237 Points ∼68% -12%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (429 - 13210, n=199, last 2 years)	7761 Points ∼100% +114%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	4708 Points ∼61% +30%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H (Turbo-Modus)	3775 Points ∼49% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	3626 Points ∼47%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (3396 - 3790, n=20)	3601 Points ∼46% -1%

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø36.6 (32-42)

Carte graphique de l'Asus ROG Zephyrus S durant le test "The Witcher 3". — Carte graphique durant le test "The Witcher 3".

	Bas	Moyen	Élevé	Ultra
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)	248.2	246.2	252.5	221.7	fps
BioShock Infinite (2013)	298.2	250.6	228.5	109.4	fps
GTA V (2015)	145.5	133.1	97	51	fps
The Witcher 3 (2015)	197.6	129.5	70.9	40	fps
Team Fortress 2 (2017)	127.2	120.2	109.6	108.1	fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	96	82.1	70.4		fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	111	56	51	43	fps
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018)	90	63	54	32	fps
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018)	142	74.6	72.5	65.9	fps
Hitman 2 (2018)	82	61.8	58.1	55.5	fps
Farming Simulator 19 (2018)	195.6	146.9	121.9	97.2	fps
Just Cause 4 (2018)	115.5	73.9	57.7	56.3	fps

BioShock Infinite | The Witcher 3 | GTA V

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	159 fps ∼100% +45%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	139.4 fps ∼88% +27%
Average of class Gaming (61.4 - 186, n=35, last 2 years)	136 fps ∼86% +24%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q	112 fps ∼70% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	109.4 fps ∼69%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (82 - 159, n=48)	104 fps ∼65% -5%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	98.9 fps ∼62% -10%

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming (42.1 - 242, n=150, last 2 years)	140 fps ∼100% +97%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	97.7 fps ∼70% +38%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	90.4 fps ∼65% +28%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	71.7 fps ∼51% +1%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q	71.4 fps ∼51% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	70.9 fps ∼51%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (52.6 - 80.6, n=49)	68 fps ∼49% -4%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (4.18 - 112, n=104, last 2 years)	84.3 fps ∼100% +65%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	64.6 fps ∼77% +27%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	51 fps ∼60%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (48.2 - 51, n=2)	49.6 fps ∼59% -3%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	48.2 fps ∼57% -5%

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos		30.3 / 33.2 / 33.2 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité		32.3 / 39 dB(A)

	30 dB silencieux 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) bruyant
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A)

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge


40.7 °C	47.7 °C	43.8 °C
38 °C	43.3 °C	40.3 °C
30.4 °C	30.7 °C	31.4 °C

Maximum: 47.7 °C
Moyenne: 38.5 °C


36.3 °C	46.1 °C	36.4 °C
39.4 °C	43.5 °C	42 °C
32.5 °C	34.4 °C	35 °C

Maximum: 46.1 °C
Moyenne: 38.4 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 48.7 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.7 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.1 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.7 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.4 °C / 88.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-2.4 °C / -4.3 F).