Notebookcheck

Courte critique du smartphone Honor 10 Lite

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, T. Hinum (traduit par Prévots), 02/11/2019

Deux versions plutôt qu'une. Le Honor 10 Lite ressemble au Huawei P Smart 2019. Ses spécifications aussi sont presque identiques, et même le prix est le même. Nous allons voir dans ce rapport de test si la seule amélioration à attendre avec le Honor 10 Lite est un meilleur appareil photo pour les selfies.

Honor 10 Lite (10 Gamme)
Processeur
HiSilicon Kirin 710
Carte graphique
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Mémoire
3072 Mo 
Écran
6.21 pouces 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 415 PPP, capacitif, IPS, brillant: oui
Disque dur
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 Go 
, 55 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD (jusqu'à 512 Go, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, capteur de proximité, boussole, micro USB
Réseau
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (900/1800), UMTS WCDMA (900/2100), LTE (1/3/7/8/20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8 x 154.8 x 73.6
Batterie
3400 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 13 MPix double : 13 MP (f/1,8) + 2 MP (f/2,4)
Appareil photo secondaire: 24 MPix f/2,0, 0,9 µm
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, chargeur USB, câble micro USB, outil pour carte SIM, étui de protection, EMUI 9, 24 Mois Garantie, DAS (tête) : 0,60 W/kg, DAS (corps) : 1,07 W/kg, fanless
Poids
162 g, Alimentation: 64 g
Prix
250 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Honor 10 Lite
Honor 10 Lite
Honor 10 Lite
Honor 10 Lite
Honor 10 Lite
Honor 10 Lite
Honor 10 Lite

Comparaison des tailles

159.8 mm 76.8 mm 7.5 mm 168 g156.4 mm 75.8 mm 7.5 mm 169 g155.2 mm 73.4 mm 7.95 mm 160 g154.8 mm 73.6 mm 8 mm 162 g153.4 mm 74.4 mm 8.3 mm 165 g149.5 mm 72 mm 8.1 mm 162 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash
356 (min: 342, max: 371) MBit/s ∼100% +636%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 32 GB eMMC Flash
337 (min: 318, max: 347) MBit/s ∼95% +596%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
336 (min: 200, max: 344) MBit/s ∼94% +594%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (min: 265, max: 284) MBit/s ∼78% +476%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=418)
223 MBit/s ∼63% +361%
Huawei P Smart 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
164 (min: 28, max: 206) MBit/s ∼46% +239%
Honor 10 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
48.4 (min: 42, max: 52) MBit/s ∼14%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
335 (min: 313, max: 342) MBit/s ∼100% +711%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (min: 164, max: 362) MBit/s ∼96% +675%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 32 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 121, max: 348) MBit/s ∼93% +655%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash
285 (min: 142, max: 294) MBit/s ∼85% +590%
Huawei P Smart 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
226 (min: 197, max: 262) MBit/s ∼67% +447%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=418)
212 MBit/s ∼63% +413%
Honor 10 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41.3 (min: 29, max: 56) MBit/s ∼12%
GPS - Honor 10 Lite
GPS - Honor 10 Lite
GPS - Honor 10 Lite
GPS - Honor 10 Lite
GPS - Honor 10 Lite
GPS - Honor 10 Lite
GPS - Garmin Edge 500
GPS - Garmin Edge 500
GPS - Garmin Edge 500
GPS - Garmin Edge 500
GPS - Garmin Edge 500
GPS - Garmin Edge 500

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
Honor 10 Lite - Mire de test.
Honor 10 Lite - Mire de test zoomée.
433
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 470 cd/m² Moyenne: 446.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.32 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 89 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 467 cd/m²
Contraste: 805:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Honor 10 Lite
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
IPS, 2280x1080, 6.26
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6
Huawei P Smart 2019
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2
Umidigi Z2 Pro
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2
Nokia 5.1 Plus
IPS, 1520x720, 5.8
Screen
-18%
21%
15%
-110%
-37%
Brightness middle
467
421
-10%
570
22%
458
-2%
479
3%
513
10%
Brightness
446
389
-13%
565
27%
440
-1%
466
4%
502
13%
Brightness Distribution
89
85
-4%
93
4%
85
-4%
73
-18%
89
0%
Black Level *
0.58
0.33
43%
0.35
40%
0.27
53%
0.36
38%
Contrast
805
1276
59%
1309
63%
1774
120%
1425
77%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.5
3.4
-127%
1.5
-0%
1.4
7%
8.2
-447%
5.2
-247%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.5
5.9
-31%
3.6
20%
3.8
16%
16.2
-260%
9.8
-118%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
3.9
-63%
1.2
50%
2.4
-0%
10.5
-338%
4.1
-71%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.26 97%
2.07 106%
2.22 99%
2.47 89%
2.33 94%
CCT
6387 102%
7330 89%
6504 100%
6235 104%
9193 71%
7423 88%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9428 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
27.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 8.4 ms hausse
↘ 18.8 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 56 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (25.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
49.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 22 ms hausse
↘ 27.2 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (40 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
3157 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5640 Points ∼100% +79%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4026 Points ∼71% +28%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
3157 Points ∼56% 0%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2631 - 4083, n=9)
3500 Points ∼62% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=316)
4562 Points ∼81% +45%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5266 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5893 Points ∼100% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4429 Points ∼75% -16%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5407 Points ∼92% +3%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5266 - 5615, n=9)
5457 Points ∼93% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=374)
4587 Points ∼78% -13%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1523 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1621 Points ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1525 Points ∼94% 0%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1527 Points ∼94% 0%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1523 - 1614, n=9)
1561 Points ∼96% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=376)
1369 Points ∼84% -10%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5803 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
6052 Points ∼82% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5387 Points ∼73% -7%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5951 Points ∼81% +3%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7384 Points ∼100% +27%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
7021 Points ∼95% +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5803 - 7141, n=9)
5669 Points ∼77% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=371)
5038 Points ∼68% -13%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7160 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
6274 Points ∼63% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5625 Points ∼57% -21%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7078 Points ∼72% -1%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
9893 Points ∼100% +38%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
9065 Points ∼92% +27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (7004 - 9424, n=9)
8073 Points ∼82% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=539)
5527 Points ∼56% -23%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2070 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2758 Points ∼100% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1845 Points ∼67% -11%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2085 Points ∼76% +1%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2013 Points ∼73% -3%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
2377 Points ∼86% +15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1851 - 2789, n=10)
2337 Points ∼85% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=385)
1834 Points ∼66% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
839 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1265 Points ∼79% +51%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
629 Points ∼39% -25%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
838 Points ∼52% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
881 Points ∼55% +5%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
721 Points ∼45% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (470 - 1194, n=10)
823 Points ∼51% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=385)
1601 Points ∼100% +91%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
967 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1438 Points ∼97% +49%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
737 Points ∼50% -24%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
966 Points ∼65% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1007 Points ∼68% +4%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
853 Points ∼57% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (563 - 1351, n=10)
957 Points ∼64% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=388)
1488 Points ∼100% +54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2067 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2751 Points ∼99% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1871 Points ∼68% -9%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2459 Points ∼89% +19%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2765 Points ∼100% +34%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
2388 Points ∼86% +16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1656 - 2723, n=10)
2351 Points ∼85% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=400)
1811 Points ∼65% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1246 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2015 Points ∼92% +62%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
954 Points ∼44% -23%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1225 Points ∼56% -2%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1423 Points ∼65% +14%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
1159 Points ∼53% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (740 - 1378, n=10)
1217 Points ∼56% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=400)
2186 Points ∼100% +75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1367 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2142 Points ∼100% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1071 Points ∼50% -22%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1379 Points ∼64% +1%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1595 Points ∼74% +17%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
1309 Points ∼61% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (844 - 1534, n=10)
1361 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=401)
1860 Points ∼87% +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2326 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2759 Points ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1821 Points ∼66% -22%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2392 Points ∼87% +3%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2512 Points ∼91% +8%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
2149 Points ∼78% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1924 - 2716, n=10)
2444 Points ∼89% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=461)
1770 Points ∼64% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
683 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1193 Points ∼90% +75%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
634 Points ∼48% -7%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
703 Points ∼53% +3%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
815 Points ∼61% +19%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
657 Points ∼49% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (457 - 856, n=10)
732 Points ∼55% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=463)
1331 Points ∼100% +95%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
810 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1365 Points ∼100% +69%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
741 Points ∼54% -9%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
834 Points ∼61% +3%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
959 Points ∼70% +18%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
777 Points ∼57% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (550 - 990, n=10)
865 Points ∼63% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=471)
1269 Points ∼93% +57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2282 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2719 Points ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1829 Points ∼67% -20%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2381 Points ∼88% +4%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2587 Points ∼95% +13%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
2159 Points ∼79% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1907 - 2654, n=10)
2437 Points ∼90% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=494)
1678 Points ∼62% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1137 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1929 Points ∼100% +70%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
845 Points ∼44% -26%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
683 Points ∼35% -40%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1112 Points ∼58% -2%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
983 Points ∼51% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (568 - 1327, n=10)
1021 Points ∼53% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=494)
1803 Points ∼93% +59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1280 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2062 Points ∼100% +61%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
960 Points ∼47% -25%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
812 Points ∼39% -37%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1273 Points ∼62% -1%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
1118 Points ∼54% -13%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (673 - 1490, n=10)
1167 Points ∼57% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=502)
1548 Points ∼75% +21%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
11211 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
20437 Points ∼86% +82%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13914 Points ∼59% +24%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
11212 Points ∼47% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
23697 Points ∼100% +111%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
18065 Points ∼76% +61%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11158 - 22668, n=8)
15042 Points ∼63% +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=652)
13700 Points ∼58% +22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
19546 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
29116 Points ∼100% +49%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15567 Points ∼53% -20%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
19510 Points ∼67% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
20991 Points ∼72% +7%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
16820 Points ∼58% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12426 - 22605, n=8)
20033 Points ∼69% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7573 - 162695, n=652)
20162 Points ∼69% +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
16775 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
26605 Points ∼100% +59%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15167 Points ∼57% -10%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
16754 Points ∼63% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
21538 Points ∼81% +28%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
17082 Points ∼64% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12120 - 22168, n=8)
18433 Points ∼69% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8513 - 83518, n=653)
16700 Points ∼63% 0%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
39 fps ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
50 fps ∼100% +28%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
39 fps ∼78% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
37 fps ∼74% -5%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
30 fps ∼60% -23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (33 - 39, n=9)
37.8 fps ∼76% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=682)
35.2 fps ∼70% -10%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
36 fps ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
47 fps ∼100% +31%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
36 fps ∼77% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
31 fps ∼66% -14%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
40 fps ∼85% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (31 - 36, n=9)
34.9 fps ∼74% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=685)
27.1 fps ∼58% -25%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
21 fps ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
22 fps ∼100% +5%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
21 fps ∼95% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
20 fps ∼91% -5%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
16 fps ∼73% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (17 - 21, n=9)
20.3 fps ∼92% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=601)
19.4 fps ∼88% -8%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
19 fps ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
21 fps ∼72% +11%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
19 fps ∼66% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
18 fps ∼62% -5%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
29 fps ∼100% +53%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (16 - 19, n=9)
18.4 fps ∼63% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=606)
17.9 fps ∼62% -6%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
14 fps ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
15 fps ∼94% +7%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
14 fps ∼88% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
12 fps ∼75% -14%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
9.6 fps ∼60% -31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12 - 14, n=9)
13.7 fps ∼86% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=462)
15.9 fps ∼100% +14%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
13 fps ∼65%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
14 fps ∼70% +8%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
13 fps ∼65% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
11 fps ∼55% -15%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
20 fps ∼100% +54%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11 - 13, n=9)
12.6 fps ∼63% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=465)
15.3 fps ∼77% +18%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
4 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5.1 fps ∼58% +28%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
4.1 fps ∼46% +3%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4.1 fps ∼46% +3%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
6.4 fps ∼72% +60%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2.2 - 7, n=9)
4.22 fps ∼48% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=165)
8.85 fps ∼100% +121%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2.6 fps ∼42%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
3.2 fps ∼52% +23%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2.6 fps ∼42% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2.6 fps ∼42% 0%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
2.1 fps ∼34% -19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2.6 - 3.5, n=9)
2.76 fps ∼45% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=165)
6.14 fps ∼100% +136%
Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.4 fps ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.1 fps ∼60% +27%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.4 fps ∼48% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
6.6 fps ∼49% +3%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
8.6 fps ∼64% +34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 6.9, n=9)
5.93 fps ∼44% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=166)
13.4 fps ∼100% +109%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7 fps ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.5 fps ∼58% +21%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7 fps ∼48% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.2 fps ∼49% +3%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
6.2 fps ∼42% -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 7, n=9)
6.31 fps ∼43% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=166)
14.7 fps ∼100% +110%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7.6 fps ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
9 fps ∼84% +18%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7.7 fps ∼72% +1%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.1 fps ∼66% -7%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
5.8 fps ∼54% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (6.9 - 7.7, n=9)
7.57 fps ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=391)
10.7 fps ∼100% +41%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.8 fps ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.4 fps ∼87% +24%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.8 fps ∼70% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
6.7 fps ∼69% -1%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
7.4 fps ∼76% +9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (6.4 - 7.1, n=9)
6.74 fps ∼70% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=395)
9.69 fps ∼100% +43%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
11.7 fps ∼77%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
7.98 fps ∼53%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (10.3 - 10.3, n=2)
10.3 fps ∼68%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.53 - 37.4, n=61)
15.1 fps ∼100%
Vulkan Medium Native (Classer selon les valeurs)
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.78 fps ∼64%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (7.26 - 9.43, n=2)
8.35 fps ∼69%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.91 - 36.2, n=56)
12.1 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
8.99 fps ∼63%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (7.38 - 8, n=2)
7.69 fps ∼54%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.2 - 38.6, n=56)
14.3 fps ∼100%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
129928 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
143551 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
122826 Points ∼86% -5%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
130070 Points ∼91% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
137018 Points ∼95% +5%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
119367 Points ∼83% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (124870 - 140188, n=9)
134298 Points ∼94% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=284)
131350 Points ∼92% +1%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
118773 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
87728 Points ∼74%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
104012 Points ∼88%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
110668 Points ∼93%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
91667 Points ∼77%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (104012 - 112870, n=8)
108955 Points ∼92%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 283270, n=485)
86485 Points ∼73%
VRMark - Amber Room (Classer selon les valeurs)
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1119 Score ∼59%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
1029 Score ∼54%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (961 - 1033, n=2)
997 Score ∼52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (552 - 5025, n=58)
1911 Score ∼100%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1004 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1086 Points ∼94% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1090 Points ∼94% +9%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
982 Points ∼85% -2%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1161 Points ∼100% +16%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
1083 Points ∼93% +8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (982 - 1212, n=9)
1101 Points ∼95% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=614)
745 Points ∼64% -26%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1470 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2293 Points ∼100% +56%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1356 Points ∼59% -8%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1469 Points ∼64% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1532 Points ∼67% +4%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
1262 Points ∼55% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1450 - 1489, n=9)
1466 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=614)
1959 Points ∼85% +33%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2969 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2269 Points ∼69% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2445 Points ∼75% -18%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2972 Points ∼91% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2721 Points ∼83% -8%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
2150 Points ∼66% -28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2823 - 4360, n=9)
3267 Points ∼100% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=614)
1466 Points ∼45% -51%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5026 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5237 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4506 Points ∼86% -10%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5074 Points ∼97% +1%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3987 Points ∼76% -21%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
3817 Points ∼73% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4826 - 5568, n=9)
5248 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=614)
2882 Points ∼55% -43%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2167 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2332 Points ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2009 Points ∼86% -7%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2159 Points ∼93% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2096 Points ∼90% -3%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
1830 Points ∼78% -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2140 - 2445, n=9)
2273 Points ∼97% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=618)
1433 Points ∼61% -34%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
413 Points ∼59%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 3072
322 Points ∼46%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (431 - 431, n=2)
431 Points ∼61%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=103)
703 Points ∼100%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
52.897 Points ∼100% +7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (47 - 55.1, n=8)
50.1 Points ∼95% +2%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
49.673 Points ∼94% +1%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)
49.221 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
47.986 Points ∼91% -3%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)
45.789 Points ∼87% -7%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
41.675 Points ∼79% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 273, n=515)
39 Points ∼74% -21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
10378 Points ∼100% +10%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
9708 Points ∼94% +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (9041 - 10288, n=9)
9547 Points ∼92% +1%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)
9423 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points ∼88% -3%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
8744 Points ∼84% -7%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)
8626 Points ∼83% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=674)
6335 Points ∼61% -33%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=694)
10740 ms * ∼100% -161%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
4611.2 ms * ∼43% -12%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)
4309 ms * ∼40% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3999 - 4853, n=9)
4247 ms * ∼40% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4122.8 ms * ∼38% -0%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)
4119.7 ms * ∼38%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
3998.8 ms * ∼37% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
3879.5 ms * ∼36% +6%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
69 Points ∼100% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=144)
63.1 Points ∼91% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (58 - 69, n=8)
62.3 Points ∼90% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
62 Points ∼90% 0%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)
62 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points ∼83% -8%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
54 Points ∼78% -13%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
49 Points ∼71% -21%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)
178 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
171 Points ∼96% -4%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
169 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
168 Points ∼94% -6%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)
167 Points ∼94% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (147 - 178, n=5)
163 Points ∼92% -8%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrme 71)
139 Points ∼78% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (66 - 362, n=332)
119 Points ∼67% -33%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Honor 10 LiteXiaomi Mi 8 LiteSamsung Galaxy A7 2018 Huawei P Smart 2019Umidigi Z2 ProNokia 5.1 PlusAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
1%
-6%
2%
2%
-8%
-13%
-28%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
66.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
64.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
66.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
58.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-12%
59.56 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
56.3 (58.4 - 74.7, n=100)
-16%
48.7 (9.5 - 87.1, n=407)
-27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.78 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
78.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
76.17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
76.06 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
0%
76.56 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
1%
74.3 (76.1 - 87.2, n=100)
-2%
66.8 (8.1 - 96.5, n=407)
-12%
Random Write 4KB
66.06
18.75
-72%
15.45
-77%
70.7
7%
20.34
-69%
25.65
-61%
24.1 (3.4 - 88.2, n=111)
-64%
20.4 (0.14 - 250, n=722)
-69%
Random Read 4KB
45.15
81.25
80%
83.98
86%
45.66
1%
86.22
91%
77.72
72%
54.4 (11.4 - 149, n=111)
20%
45.3 (1.59 - 175, n=722)
0%
Sequential Write 256KB
190.55
172.43
-10%
104.87
-45%
191.4
0%
188.12
-1%
88.92
-53%
171 (40 - 246, n=111)
-10%
92.9 (2.99 - 503, n=722)
-51%
Sequential Read 256KB
288.55
282.62
-2%
295.76
2%
288.27
0%
292.94
2%
301.56
5%
272 (95.6 - 704, n=111)
-6%
261 (12.1 - 1468, n=722)
-10%

Arena of Valor

010203040Tooltip
; min: Ø31.2 (29-32)
; high HD: Ø30.7 (27-32)

Asphalt 9: Legends

010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø29.8 (28-31)
; Standard / low: Ø29.9 (29-31)
 33.4 °C33.4 °C32.7 °C 
 32.6 °C30.5 °C31.9 °C 
 30.4 °C30.1 °C30.5 °C 
Maximum: 33.4 °C
Moyenne: 31.7 °C
29 °C29.8 °C32.6 °C
28.5 °C28.9 °C33.4 °C
28.3 °C29.8 °C32.1 °C
Maximum: 33.4 °C
Moyenne: 30.3 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  26.2 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2019.932.32520.227.13121.424.24022.922.65026.930.16318.2238022.826.310019.122.712515.825.416016.538.920014.239.625013.344.631515.347.340014.654.850014.757.963014.562.380013.766.2100014.469.1125013.968.7160013.968.4200013.870.6250013.870.3315014.276.1400014.380.9500014.677.5630014.669800014.363.6100001561.9125001552.91600014.742.2SPL26.385.6N0.855.1median 14.5median 62.3Delta0.711.132.830.524.328.818.625.824.325.833.830.221.231.624.829.318.523.916.423.617.138.117.940.716.845.814.947.915.155.714.257.913.963.514.867.514.27014.770.114.468.814.3701473.313.876.914.882.714.478.81571.214.766.114.860.914.853.914.746.526.7870.859.4median 14.8median 63.50.611.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor 10 LiteHuawei P Smart 2019
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor 10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei P Smart 2019 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.04 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 1 / 2.19 / 2.2 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 4.64 / 7.7 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 10 Lite
3400 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
3350 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Huawei P Smart 2019
3400 mAh
Umidigi Z2 Pro
3550 mAh
Nokia 5.1 Plus
3060 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
9%
17%
4%
14%
30%
0%
15%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.56
44%
0.71
29%
0.84
16%
0.71
29%
0.56
44%
0.948 (0.8 - 1.3, n=9)
5%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=750)
12%
Idle Average *
2.19
1.99
9%
1.36
38%
2.21
-1%
2.01
8%
1.72
21%
2.11 (1.2 - 2.5, n=9)
4%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=749)
21%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
2.05
7%
1.47
33%
2.23
-1%
2.03
8%
1.76
20%
2.44 (2.2 - 3.6, n=9)
-11%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=750)
8%
Load Average *
4.64
4.62
-0%
5.13
-11%
4.2
9%
3.61
22%
3.11
33%
4.66 (4.06 - 6, n=9)
-0%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=744)
12%
Load Maximum *
7.7
8.94
-16%
7.89
-2%
7.86
-2%
7.34
5%
5.2
32%
7.38 (6.13 - 9.1, n=9)
4%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=744)
24%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
25h 33min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 71)
8h 04min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
8h 22min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
2h 58min
Honor 10 Lite
3400 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
3350 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Huawei P Smart 2019
3400 mAh
Umidigi Z2 Pro
3550 mAh
Nokia 5.1 Plus
3060 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
10%
35%
6%
29%
33%
Reader / Idle
1533
1678
9%
1467
-4%
1293
-16%
1269
-17%
1953
27%
H.264
502
662
32%
836
67%
464
-8%
WiFi v1.3
484
547
13%
605
25%
506
5%
669
38%
779
61%
Load
178
150
-16%
273
53%
257
44%
294
65%
198
11%

Points positifs

+ bonnes performances
+ Android Pie
+ bordures d'écran étroites

Points négatifs

- pas d'USB C
- WLAN lent
- throttling en cas de grosses sollicitations
- autonomie
- bandes GSM et UMTS réduites
En test : le Honor 10 Lite. Modèle de test fourni par notebooksbilliger.de.
En test : le Honor 10 Lite. Modèle de test fourni par notebooksbilliger.de.

Dans nos tests, le Honor 10 Lite s’est comporté comme un smartphone du milieu de gamme performant, avec un bon capteur photo pour selfies. Les performances suffiront largement pour les tâches classiques et pour les jeux actuels. Le stockage est dans la norme pour ce niveau de prix, et le reste des fonctionnalités du smartphone est également compétitif. Cependant, les clients intéressés devraient également être au courant du nombre réduit de fréquences GMS et UMTS.

Pour environ 250 €, le Honor 10 Lite propose un bon appareil photo à selfies et de bonnes performances, du milieu de gamme. Mais le WLAN lent gâche un peu l’ensemble.

Les clients potentiels pourraient se demander la différence avec le Huawei P Smart (2019). Ce dernier possède des composants à peu près identiques et possède un WLAN plus rapide, ce qui est la plus grosse différence entre les deux smartphones. Les utilisateurs pour qui les selfies sont importants devraient opter pour le Honor 10 Lite, et ceux qui préfèrent avoir une connexion sans-fil rapide devraient choisir le Huawei P Smart (2019). Ceux qui ne parviennent pas à se décider devraient peut-être regarder du côté des concurrents.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Honor 10 Lite - 02/08/2019 v6
Mike Wobker

Châssis
86%
Clavier
66 / 75 → 88%
Dispositif de pointage
88%
Connectivité
36 / 60 → 60%
Poids
91%
Autonomie
90%
Écran
89%
Performances en jeu
48 / 63 → 76%
Performances dans les applications
57 / 70 → 82%
Chauffe
93%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 75%
Appareil photo
63%
Moyenne
75%
84%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du smartphone Honor 10 Lite
Mike Wobker, 2019-02-11 (Update: 2019-02-11)