Notebookcheck

Courte critique du smartphone Nokia 5.1 Plus (Nokia 5X)

Florian Schaar, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduit par Prévots), 01/10/2019

Fratricide ? Non seulement le Nokia 5.1 Plus est plus performant que le Nokia 5.1, mais il surpasse également le Nokia 6.1, malgré la numérotation de Nokia. A-t-on à faire là à de la concurrence interne, ou est-ce juste une confusion dans la numérotation ?

Nokia 5.1 Plus (5 Gamme)
Processeur
Mediatek Helio P60 1.8 GHz
Carte graphique
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Mémoire
3072 Mo 
Écran
5.8 pouces 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 290 PPP, capacitif, IPS, brillant: oui
Disque dur
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 Go 
, 22 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD jusqu'à 256 Go, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, boussole, gyroscope, capteur de proximité, USB Type-C
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM : B2, B3, B5, B8. CDMA. HSPA: B1, B2, B5, B8. LTE : B1, B3, B5, B7, B8, B40, B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.1 x 149.5 x 72
Batterie
3060 mAh Lithium-Ion
Système d'exploitation
Android 8.1 Oreo
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 13 MPix double : 13 MP, f/2,0 et 5 MP
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix f/2,2
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: 1, Clavier: virtuel, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, 24 Mois Garantie, DAS - Corps : 1,885 W/kg, tête : 0,778 W/kg., fanless
Poids
162 g, Alimentation: 63 g
Prix
249 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparaison des tailles

160.4 mm 76.6 mm 7.8 mm 175 g160.2 mm 75.7 mm 7.9 mm 191 g153.8 mm 72.3 mm 8.3 mm 167 g153.4 mm 74.4 mm 8.3 mm 165 g150.7 mm 72.3 mm 8.3 mm 163 g149.5 mm 72 mm 8.1 mm 162 g148.8 mm 75.8 mm 8.2 mm 175 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 32 GB eMMC Flash
337 (min: 318, max: 347) MBit/s ∼100%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
336 (min: 200, max: 344) MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
289 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
BQ Aquaris X2
Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
275 MBit/s ∼82% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 939, n=396)
219 MBit/s ∼65% -35%
Honor 8X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
207 (min: 162, max: 243) MBit/s ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
119 MBit/s ∼35% -65%
Motorola Moto G6
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s ∼34% -66%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
345 MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
335 (min: 313, max: 342) MBit/s ∼97% +7%
BQ Aquaris X2
Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
322 (min: 275) MBit/s ∼93% +3%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 32 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 121, max: 348) MBit/s ∼90%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=396)
210 MBit/s ∼61% -33%
Honor 8X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
182 (min: 136, max: 231) MBit/s ∼53% -42%
Motorola Moto G6
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s ∼33% -64%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s ∼33% -64%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
Nokia 5.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P60, ARM Mali-G72 MP3; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø334 (318-347)
Umidigi Z2 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, ARM Mali-G72 MP3; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø331 (200-344)
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø207 (162-243)
Nokia 5.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P60, ARM Mali-G72 MP3; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø312 (121-348)
Umidigi Z2 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, ARM Mali-G72 MP3; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø335 (313-342)
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø182 (136-231)
GPS Nokia 5.1 Plus : vue générale.
GPS Nokia 5.1 Plus : vue générale.
GPS Nokia 5.1 Plus : lac.
GPS Nokia 5.1 Plus : lac.
GPS Nokia 5.1 Plus - Virage serré.
GPS Nokia 5.1 Plus - Virage serré.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : lac.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : lac.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Virage serré.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Virage serré.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
Nokia 5.1 Plus - Mire de test.
Mire de test.
Nokia 5.1 Plus - Mire de test zoomée.
Nokia 5.1 Plus - ColorChecker Passport : la couleur de référence se situe dans la partie inférieure de chaque bloc.
517
cd/m²
511
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
513
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
506
cd/m²
509
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 522 cd/m² Moyenne: 501.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.15 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 89 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 513 cd/m²
Contraste: 1425:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
93.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.33
Nokia 5.1 Plus
IPS, 1520x720, 5.8
Nokia 6 2018
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Umidigi Z2 Pro
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6
Honor 8X
LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5
Motorola Moto G6
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
BQ Aquaris X2
IPS LCD, 2160x1080, 5.65
Screen
-33%
-33%
33%
-29%
-1%
-9%
Brightness middle
513
417
-19%
479
-7%
519
1%
484
-6%
488
-5%
631
23%
Brightness
502
421
-16%
466
-7%
513
2%
469
-7%
478
-5%
622
24%
Brightness Distribution
89
88
-1%
73
-18%
93
4%
93
4%
95
7%
96
8%
Black Level *
0.36
0.61
-69%
0.27
25%
0.55
-53%
0.42
-17%
0.61
-69%
Contrast
1425
684
-52%
1774
24%
880
-38%
1162
-18%
1034
-27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.2
6.1
-17%
8.2
-58%
1.8
65%
7.3
-40%
3.9
25%
5.5
-6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.8
11.2
-14%
16.2
-65%
3.6
63%
11.1
-13%
6.8
31%
8.5
13%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.1
7.1
-73%
10.5
-156%
1.5
63%
7.4
-80%
5.3
-29%
5.6
-37%
Gamma
2.33 94%
2.16 102%
2.47 89%
2.06 107%
2.16 102%
2.41 91%
2.38 92%
CCT
7423 88%
8362 78%
9193 71%
6462 101%
8534 76%
7146 91%
7531 86%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9533 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
46.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 26 ms hausse
↘ 20.4 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (25.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
66 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 32.4 ms hausse
↘ 33.6 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (40.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Points ∼0%
Nokia 6 2018
3690 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3229 Points ∼71%
Honor 8X
4083 Points ∼90%
Motorola Moto G6
2777 Points ∼61%
BQ Aquaris X2
4309 Points ∼95%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (5172 - 5309, n=3)
3494 Points ∼77%
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=294)
4519 Points ∼100%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Points ∼0%
Nokia 6 2018
4210 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3912 Points ∼70%
Honor 8X
5557 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G6
3868 Points ∼70%
BQ Aquaris X2
4974 Points ∼90%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (5743 - 5743, n=4)
2824 (min: 5743, max: 5743) Points ∼51%
Average of class Smartphone (1174 - 11598, n=348)
4470 Points ∼80%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Points ∼0%
Nokia 6 2018
883 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
754 Points ∼47%
Honor 8X
1614 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G6
743 Points ∼46%
BQ Aquaris X2
1323 Points ∼82%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1487 - 1487, n=4)
740 (min: 1487, max: 1487) Points ∼46%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 4824, n=350)
1323 Points ∼82%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
7021 Points ∼95%
Nokia 6 2018
4719 Points ∼64% -33%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
7384 Points ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
4422 Points ∼60% -37%
Honor 8X
7141 Points ∼97% +2%
Motorola Moto G6
4552 Points ∼62% -35%
BQ Aquaris X2
5706 Points ∼77% -19%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (6950 - 7486, n=5)
7255 Points ∼98% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (3227 - 10450, n=342)
4921 Points ∼67% -30%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
9065 Points ∼92%
Nokia 6 2018
5484 Points ∼55% -40%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
9893 Points ∼100% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
5199 Points ∼53% -43%
Honor 8X
8939 Points ∼90% -1%
Motorola Moto G6
5321 Points ∼54% -41%
BQ Aquaris X2
6437 Points ∼65% -29%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (9065 - 10757, n=5)
9884 Points ∼100% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (4290 - 14439, n=510)
5373 Points ∼54% -41%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2377 Points ∼88%
Nokia 6 2018
1686 Points ∼62% -29%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2013 Points ∼75% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
1780 Points ∼66% -25%
Honor 8X
2702 Points ∼100% +14%
Motorola Moto G6
1786 Points ∼66% -25%
BQ Aquaris X2
2396 Points ∼89% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2013 - 2918, n=5)
2520 Points ∼93% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 4535, n=357)
1811 Points ∼67% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
721 Points ∼47%
Nokia 6 2018
801 Points ∼52% +11%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
881 Points ∼57% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
412 Points ∼27% -43%
Honor 8X
801 Points ∼52% +11%
Motorola Moto G6
413 Points ∼27% -43%
BQ Aquaris X2
872 Points ∼56% +21%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (721 - 993, n=5)
875 Points ∼57% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (76 - 8206, n=357)
1547 Points ∼100% +115%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
853 Points ∼59%
Nokia 6 2018
907 Points ∼63% +6%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1007 Points ∼70% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
497 Points ∼34% -42%
Honor 8X
950 Points ∼66% +11%
Motorola Moto G6
498 Points ∼34% -42%
BQ Aquaris X2
1016 Points ∼70% +19%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (853 - 1164, n=5)
1023 Points ∼71% +20%
Average of class Smartphone (94 - 6312, n=360)
1445 Points ∼100% +69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2388 Points ∼86%
Nokia 6 2018
1740 Points ∼63% -27%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2765 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
1773 Points ∼64% -26%
Honor 8X
2697 Points ∼98% +13%
Motorola Moto G6
1816 Points ∼66% -24%
BQ Aquaris X2
2359 Points ∼85% -1%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2388 - 2924, n=4)
2711 Points ∼98% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=373)
1784 Points ∼65% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1159 Points ∼54%
Nokia 6 2018
1320 Points ∼62% +14%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1423 Points ∼67% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
713 Points ∼33% -38%
Honor 8X
1316 Points ∼62% +14%
Motorola Moto G6
713 Points ∼33% -38%
BQ Aquaris X2
1402 Points ∼66% +21%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1159 - 1605, n=4)
1407 Points ∼66% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=373)
2132 Points ∼100% +84%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1309 Points ∼72%
Nokia 6 2018
1395 Points ∼77% +7%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1595 Points ∼88% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
822 Points ∼45% -37%
Honor 8X
1485 Points ∼82% +13%
Motorola Moto G6
824 Points ∼45% -37%
BQ Aquaris X2
1540 Points ∼85% +18%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1309 - 1784, n=4)
1567 Points ∼86% +20%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7980, n=374)
1815 Points ∼100% +39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2149 Points ∼81%
Nokia 6 2018
1738 Points ∼65% -19%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2512 Points ∼94% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
1852 Points ∼70% -14%
Honor 8X
2663 Points ∼100% +24%
Motorola Moto G6
1834 Points ∼69% -15%
BQ Aquaris X2
2353 Points ∼88% +9%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2149 - 2528, n=5)
2434 Points ∼91% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (486 - 4262, n=433)
1740 Points ∼65% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
657 Points ∼51%
Nokia 6 2018
707 Points ∼55% +8%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
815 Points ∼64% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
366 Points ∼29% -44%
Honor 8X
798 Points ∼62% +21%
Motorola Moto G6
363 Points ∼28% -45%
BQ Aquaris X2
816 Points ∼64% +24%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (628 - 986, n=5)
790 Points ∼62% +20%
Average of class Smartphone (65 - 6362, n=435)
1278 Points ∼100% +95%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
777 Points ∼63%
Nokia 6 2018
814 Points ∼67% +5%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
959 Points ∼78% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
445 Points ∼36% -43%
Honor 8X
945 Points ∼77% +22%
Motorola Moto G6
442 Points ∼36% -43%
BQ Aquaris X2
955 Points ∼78% +23%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (733 - 1141, n=5)
924 Points ∼75% +19%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5734, n=443)
1224 Points ∼100% +58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2159 Points ∼82%
Nokia 6 2018
1733 Points ∼66% -20%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2587 Points ∼98% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
1832 Points ∼69% -15%
Honor 8X
2645 Points ∼100% +23%
Motorola Moto G6
1803 Points ∼68% -16%
BQ Aquaris X2
2338 Points ∼88% +8%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2159 - 2720, n=4)
2494 Points ∼94% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 4240, n=467)
1646 Points ∼62% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
983 Points ∼56%
Nokia 6 2018
1249 Points ∼72% +27%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1112 Points ∼64% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
692 Points ∼40% -30%
Honor 8X
1280 Points ∼73% +30%
Motorola Moto G6
690 Points ∼40% -30%
BQ Aquaris X2
1337 Points ∼77% +36%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (861 - 1593, n=4)
1137 Points ∼65% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 10008, n=467)
1743 Points ∼100% +77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1118 Points ∼75%
Nokia 6 2018
1332 Points ∼89% +19%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1273 Points ∼85% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
803 Points ∼54% -28%
Honor 8X
1445 Points ∼97% +29%
Motorola Moto G6
800 Points ∼53% -28%
BQ Aquaris X2
1478 Points ∼99% +32%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1008 - 1755, n=4)
1289 Points ∼86% +15%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 7673, n=475)
1496 Points ∼100% +34%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
18065 Points ∼76%
Nokia 6 2018
13196 Points ∼56% -27%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
23697 Points ∼100% +31%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
13988 Points ∼59% -23%
Honor 8X
17450 Points ∼74% -3%
Motorola Moto G6
13997 Points ∼59% -23%
BQ Aquaris X2
16747 Points ∼71% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (18065 - 24828, n=5)
22578 Points ∼95% +25%
Average of class Smartphone (8253 - 45072, n=626)
13505 Points ∼57% -25%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
16820 Points ∼78%
Nokia 6 2018
18572 Points ∼86% +10%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
20991 Points ∼97% +25%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
12527 Points ∼58% -26%
Honor 8X
21533 Points ∼100% +28%
Motorola Moto G6
12441 Points ∼58% -26%
BQ Aquaris X2
20806 Points ∼97% +24%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (16820 - 21847, n=5)
19897 Points ∼92% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (3585 - 162695, n=626)
19454 Points ∼90% +16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
17082 Points ∼79%
Nokia 6 2018
17030 Points ∼79% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
21538 Points ∼100% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
12825 Points ∼60% -25%
Honor 8X
20468 Points ∼95% +20%
Motorola Moto G6
12756 Points ∼59% -25%
BQ Aquaris X2
19743 Points ∼92% +16%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (17082 - 22323, n=5)
20432 Points ∼95% +20%
Average of class Smartphone (4164 - 83518, n=627)
16275 Points ∼76% -5%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
30 fps ∼77%
Nokia 6 2018
30 fps ∼77% 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
37 fps ∼95% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
22 fps ∼56% -27%
Honor 8X
39 fps ∼100% +30%
Motorola Moto G6
22 fps ∼56% -27%
BQ Aquaris X2
36 fps ∼92% +20%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (30 - 38, n=5)
35.4 fps ∼91% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 251, n=652)
34 fps ∼87% +13%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
40 fps ∼100%
Nokia 6 2018
31 fps ∼78% -22%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
31 fps ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
20 fps ∼50% -50%
Honor 8X
36 fps ∼90% -10%
Motorola Moto G6
20 fps ∼50% -50%
BQ Aquaris X2
34 fps ∼85% -15%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (31 - 40, n=5)
34.4 fps ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 120, n=655)
26.4 fps ∼66% -34%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
16 fps ∼76%
Nokia 6 2018
14 fps ∼67% -12%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
20 fps ∼95% +25%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
9.3 fps ∼44% -42%
Honor 8X
21 fps ∼100% +31%
Motorola Moto G6
9.4 fps ∼45% -41%
BQ Aquaris X2
16 fps ∼76% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (16 - 20, n=5)
18.8 fps ∼90% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (2.7 - 132, n=571)
18.6 fps ∼89% +16%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
29 fps ∼100%
Nokia 6 2018
15 fps ∼52% -48%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
18 fps ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
8.9 fps ∼31% -69%
Honor 8X
19 fps ∼66% -34%
Motorola Moto G6
8.9 fps ∼31% -69%
BQ Aquaris X2
15 fps ∼52% -48%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (17 - 29, n=5)
20.4 fps ∼70% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (5.4 - 115, n=576)
17.3 fps ∼60% -40%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
9.6 fps ∼62%
Nokia 6 2018
9.8 fps ∼63% +2%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
12 fps ∼77% +25%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
6.1 fps ∼39% -36%
Honor 8X
14 fps ∼90% +46%
Motorola Moto G6
6.1 fps ∼39% -36%
BQ Aquaris X2
10 fps ∼65% +4%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (9.6 - 12, n=5)
11.5 fps ∼74% +20%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88, n=433)
15.5 fps ∼100% +61%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
20 fps ∼100%
Nokia 6 2018
10 fps ∼50% -50%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
11 fps ∼55% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
5.8 fps ∼29% -71%
Honor 8X
13 fps ∼65% -35%
Motorola Moto G6
5.8 fps ∼29% -71%
BQ Aquaris X2
9.8 fps ∼49% -51%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (11 - 20, n=5)
12.8 fps ∼64% -36%
Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 110, n=436)
14.8 fps ∼74% -26%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
6.4 fps ∼73%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
4.1 fps ∼47% -36%
Honor 8X
4.1 fps ∼47% -36%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2.6 - 6.4, n=4)
4.35 fps ∼49% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (0.86 - 59, n=137)
8.81 fps ∼100% +38%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2.1 fps ∼35%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2.6 fps ∼43% +24%
Honor 8X
2.6 fps ∼43% +24%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2.1 - 4.3, n=4)
2.93 fps ∼48% +40%
Average of class Smartphone (0.26 - 31, n=137)
6.06 fps ∼100% +189%
Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
8.6 fps ∼65%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
6.6 fps ∼50% -23%
Honor 8X
5.2 fps ∼39% -40%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (6.6 - 8.6, n=4)
7.28 fps ∼55% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (1.8 - 59, n=138)
13.2 fps ∼100% +53%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
6.2 fps ∼42%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
7.2 fps ∼49% +16%
Honor 8X
4.6 fps ∼32% -26%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (6.2 - 7.6, n=4)
7.13 fps ∼49% +15%
Average of class Smartphone (0.94 - 63, n=137)
14.6 fps ∼100% +135%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
5.8 fps ∼56%
Nokia 6 2018
5.6 fps ∼54% -3%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
7.1 fps ∼68% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3.5 fps ∼34% -40%
Honor 8X
7.6 fps ∼73% +31%
Motorola Moto G6
3.4 fps ∼33% -41%
BQ Aquaris X2
6.3 fps ∼61% +9%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (5.8 - 7.4, n=5)
6.92 fps ∼67% +19%
Average of class Smartphone (0.89 - 54, n=362)
10.4 fps ∼100% +79%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
7.4 fps ∼79%
Nokia 6 2018
5.9 fps ∼63% -20%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
6.7 fps ∼71% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3.3 fps ∼35% -55%
Honor 8X
6.4 fps ∼68% -14%
Motorola Moto G6
3.3 fps ∼35% -55%
BQ Aquaris X2
6 fps ∼64% -19%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (6.7 - 7.4, n=5)
6.98 fps ∼74% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 58, n=366)
9.39 fps ∼100% +27%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
7.98 fps ∼30%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
11.7 fps ∼44% +47%
Honor 8X
10.26 (min: 5.41, max: 30.41) fps ∼39% +29%
BQ Aquaris X2
7.5 fps ∼28% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (7.98 - 11.7, n=2)
9.84 fps ∼37% +23%
Average of class Smartphone (3.09 - 651, n=58)
26.5 fps ∼100% +232%
Vulkan Medium Native (Classer selon les valeurs)
Umidigi Z2 Pro
7.78 fps ∼33%
Honor 8X
9.43 (min: 4.95, max: 26.06) fps ∼40%
BQ Aquaris X2
6.63 fps ∼28%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
7.78 fps ∼33%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 606, n=53)
23.6 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Umidigi Z2 Pro
8.99 fps ∼31%
Honor 8X
7.38 (min: 4.38, max: 16.86) fps ∼26%
Average Mediatek Helio P60
8.99 fps ∼31%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 739, n=53)
28.6 fps ∼100%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
119367 Points ∼85%
Nokia 6 2018
90435 Points ∼65% -24%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
137018 Points ∼98% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
70016 Points ∼50% -41%
Honor 8X
140188 Points ∼100% +17%
Motorola Moto G6
71352 Points ∼51% -40%
BQ Aquaris X2
116748 Points ∼83% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (119367 - 138589, n=5)
131946 Points ∼94% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (63421 - 374820, n=254)
126932 Points ∼91% +6%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
91667 Points ∼81%
Nokia 6 2018
72580 Points ∼64% -21%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
110668 Points ∼98% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
55332 Points ∼49% -40%
Honor 8X
112870 Points ∼100% +23%
Motorola Moto G6
59454 Points ∼53% -35%
BQ Aquaris X2
96430 Points ∼85% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (91667 - 110668, n=4)
102435 Points ∼91% +12%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 274007, n=460)
83838 Points ∼74% -9%
VRMark - Amber Room (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1029 Score ∼53%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1119 Score ∼58% +9%
Honor 8X
1033 Score ∼53% 0%
BQ Aquaris X2
681 Score ∼35% -34%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1029 - 1119, n=2)
1074 Score ∼55% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 5025, n=55)
1945 Score ∼100% +89%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1083 Points ∼90%
Nokia 6 2018
895 Points ∼74% -17%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1161 Points ∼96% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
814 Points ∼67% -25%
Honor 8X
1207 Points ∼100% +11%
Motorola Moto G6
688 Points ∼57% -36%
BQ Aquaris X2
1059 Points ∼88% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1083 - 1161, n=4)
1130 Points ∼94% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=584)
732 Points ∼61% -32%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1262 Points ∼67%
Nokia 6 2018
1520 Points ∼81% +20%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1532 Points ∼81% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
968 Points ∼51% -23%
Honor 8X
1456 Points ∼77% +15%
Motorola Moto G6
965 Points ∼51% -24%
BQ Aquaris X2
1597 Points ∼85% +27%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1262 - 1590, n=4)
1468 Points ∼78% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=584)
1885 Points ∼100% +49%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2150 Points ∼49%
Nokia 6 2018
1161 Points ∼27% -46%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2721 Points ∼62% +27%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
914 Points ∼21% -57%
Honor 8X
4360 Points ∼100% +103%
Motorola Moto G6
770 Points ∼18% -64%
BQ Aquaris X2
2016 Points ∼46% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1958 - 2721, n=4)
2276 Points ∼52% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=584)
1407 Points ∼32% -35%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
3817 Points ∼69%
Nokia 6 2018
3237 Points ∼59% -15%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
3987 Points ∼72% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
2560 Points ∼46% -33%
Honor 8X
5529 Points ∼100% +45%
Motorola Moto G6
2560 Points ∼46% -33%
BQ Aquaris X2
4434 Points ∼80% +16%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (3817 - 4736, n=4)
4114 Points ∼74% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=584)
2790 Points ∼50% -27%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1830 Points ∼76%
Nokia 6 2018
1504 Points ∼62% -18%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2096 Points ∼87% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
1165 Points ∼48% -36%
Honor 8X
2410 Points ∼100% +32%
Motorola Moto G6
1069 Points ∼44% -42%
BQ Aquaris X2
1972 Points ∼82% +8%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1830 - 2096, n=4)
1980 Points ∼82% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=588)
1384 Points ∼57% -24%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Nokia 5.1 Plus
322 Points ∼45%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
413 Points ∼58% +28%
Honor 8X
431 Points ∼61% +34%
Motorola Moto G6
129 Points ∼18% -60%
BQ Aquaris X2
260 Points ∼37% -19%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (322 - 413, n=2)
368 Points ∼52% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (35 - 2754, n=96)
710 Points ∼100% +120%

Légende

 
Nokia 5.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P60, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Umidigi Z2 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
47.012 Points ∼100% +13%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (41.7 - 48.9, n=5)
45.9 Points ∼98% +10%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)
45.789 Points ∼97% +10%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
44.245 Points ∼94% +6%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
41.675 Points ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone (17.6 - 273, n=491)
38.2 Points ∼81% -8%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
28.167 Points ∼60% -32%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
22.556 Points ∼48% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)
22.191 Points ∼47% -47%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
9095 Points ∼100% +4%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
9004 Points ∼99% +3%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
8744 Points ∼96%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (8287 - 9059, n=5)
8699 Points ∼96% -1%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)
8626 Points ∼95% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3126 - 43280, n=646)
6099 Points ∼67% -30%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
4993 Points ∼55% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)
4032 Points ∼44% -54%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
3943 Points ∼43% -55%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
11751.4 ms * ∼100% -155%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)
11449.6 ms * ∼97% -148%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=665)
10916 ms * ∼93% -137%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
9922.7 ms * ∼84% -115%
BQ Aquaris X2
4733 ms * ∼40% -3%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
4611.2 ms * ∼39%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (4309 - 4611, n=5)
4428 ms * ∼38% +4%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)
4309 ms * ∼37% +7%
Honor 8X
4247.7 ms * ∼36% +8%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 161, n=118)
63.4 Points ∼100% +29%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
58 Points ∼91% +18%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
54 Points ∼85% +10%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
54 Points ∼85% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (49 - 54, n=3)
52 Points ∼82% +6%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
49 Points ∼77%
Nokia 6 2018 (Chrome 66)
35 Points ∼55% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
32 Points ∼50% -35%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
31 Points ∼49% -37%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)
167 Points ∼100% +20%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
164 Points ∼98% +18%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (139 - 167, n=2)
153 Points ∼92% +10%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
147 Points ∼88% +6%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrme 71)
139 Points ∼83%
Average of class Smartphone (66 - 362, n=324)
119 Points ∼71% -14%
Nokia 6 2018
117 Points ∼70% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)
93 Points ∼56% -33%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
90 Points ∼54% -35%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Nokia 5.1 PlusNokia 6 2018Umidigi Z2 ProSamsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018Honor 8XMotorola Moto G6BQ Aquaris X2Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-9%
16%
-4%
32%
23%
5%
-20%
-19%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59.56 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
61.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
58.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-1%
67.76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
14%
68.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
14%
61.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
62.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
49.3 (3.4 - 87.1, n=130)
-17%
48.3 (9.5 - 87.1, n=391)
-19%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.56 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
83.42 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
76.06 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-1%
83.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
75.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
75.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
82.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
68 (8.2 - 96.5, n=130)
-11%
66.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=391)
-13%
Random Write 4KB
25.65
15.3
-40%
20.34
-21%
16.1
-37%
59.87
133%
59.91
134%
14.4
-44%
18.7 (0.75 - 77.3, n=172)
-27%
19.2 (0.14 - 250, n=695)
-25%
Random Read 4KB
77.72
38.78
-50%
86.22
11%
72.91
-6%
49.54
-36%
69.91
-10%
43.9
-44%
38.2 (3.59 - 117, n=172)
-51%
43.8 (1.59 - 175, n=695)
-44%
Sequential Write 256KB
88.92
118.32
33%
188.12
112%
88.48
0%
169.98
91%
117.19
32%
188.7
112%
94.9 (14.8 - 189, n=172)
7%
90.1 (2.99 - 392, n=695)
1%
Sequential Read 256KB
301.56
272.59
-10%
292.94
-3%
298.81
-1%
283.87
-6%
238.23
-21%
270.5
-10%
234 (25.8 - 452, n=172)
-22%
254 (12.1 - 1468, n=695)
-16%
Shadow Fight 3
0102030405060Tooltip
; high: Ø48.4 (25-57)
; minimal: Ø49.8 (42-56)
Asphalt 9
0102030Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø16.3 (12-21)
; Standard / low: Ø18.9 (13-26)
PUBG Mobile
0102030Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø24.6 (8-26)
; Balanced: Ø24.9 (23-26)
; HD: Ø25 (23-26)
 34.8 °C34.4 °C34.2 °C 
 33.4 °C34.5 °C34 °C 
 33.1 °C33.7 °C34.7 °C 
Maximum: 34.8 °C
Moyenne: 34.1 °C
31.7 °C32.1 °C34.1 °C
31.1 °C31.9 °C34.7 °C
31.3 °C31.8 °C32.5 °C
Maximum: 34.7 °C
Moyenne: 32.4 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  27.8 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 20.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.7392526.724.33128.723.14026.5265036.934.66326.7218026.92310022.321.512520.222.716017.735.920018.740.725019.250.531515.85840015.661.250013.960.763014.361.780014.861.4100013.459.5125014.367160014.571.3200013.873.6250013.675.1315014.176400014.174.4500014.977.363001578.1800015.272.91000014.972.81250014.7681600014.762.8SPL26.785.6N0.859.8median 14.8median 62.8Delta1.711.835.245.832.946.537.232.231.738.439.639.728.332.227.330.926.929.726.732.52433.620.939.120.947.319.551.118.559.217.568.517.566.715.768.515.872.916.673.615.87515.476.815.578.51676.715.876.41676.116.375.516.375.516.268.616.463.616.452.128.687.21.167.9median 16.4median 68.52.112.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia 5.1 PlusNokia 6 2018
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia 5.1 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Nokia 6 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.12 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.56 / 1.72 / 1.76 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 3.11 / 5.2 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nokia 5.1 Plus
3060 mAh
Nokia 6 2018
3000 mAh
Umidigi Z2 Pro
3550 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3500 mAh
Honor 8X
3750 mAh
Motorola Moto G6
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2
3100 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P60
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-0%
-23%
32%
-38%
3%
-26%
-25%
-23%
Idle Minimum *
0.56
0.67
-20%
0.71
-27%
0.62
-11%
0.92
-64%
0.6
-7%
0.65
-16%
0.804 (0.56 - 1.08, n=5)
-44%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=724)
-57%
Idle Average *
1.72
1.76
-2%
2.01
-17%
0.96
44%
2.3
-34%
1.81
-5%
2.24
-30%
2.17 (1.72 - 3.3, n=5)
-26%
1.737 (0.6 - 6.2, n=723)
-1%
Idle Maximum *
1.76
1.78
-1%
2.03
-15%
0.99
44%
2.32
-32%
1.86
-6%
2.26
-28%
2.21 (1.76 - 3.3, n=5)
-26%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=724)
-15%
Load Average *
3.11
2.82
9%
3.61
-16%
1.85
41%
4.37
-41%
2.78
11%
3.87
-24%
3.45 (2.74 - 4.4, n=5)
-11%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=718)
-31%
Load Maximum *
5.2
4.56
12%
7.34
-41%
3.04
42%
6.13
-18%
4.04
22%
6.8
-31%
6.08 (5 - 7.34, n=5)
-17%
5.86 (1.2 - 14.2, n=718)
-13%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
32h 33min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 71)
12h 59min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
3h 18min
Nokia 5.1 Plus
3060 mAh
Nokia 6 2018
3000 mAh
Umidigi Z2 Pro
3550 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3500 mAh
Honor 8X
3750 mAh
Motorola Moto G6
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2
3100 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
33%
-0%
24%
9%
1%
-21%
Reader / Idle
1953
1833
-6%
1269
-35%
1817
-7%
1170
-40%
WiFi v1.3
779
942
21%
669
-14%
848
9%
852
9%
553
-29%
617
-21%
Load
198
362
83%
294
48%
335
69%
338
71%
H.264
675
916
600

Points positifs

+ android pur
+ mises à jour de sécurité rapides
+ autonomie au ralenti
+ consommation énergétique
+ température extérieure
+ certifié aptX
+ bandes LTE nombreuses
+ pas de bloatware
+ écran anti-reflets
+ appareils photo
+ robuste
+ desgin
+ jeux tournent à 60 FPS
+ tactile
+ résolution d'écran
+ double SIM
+ cartes micro SD jusqu'à 256 Go

Points négatifs

- écouteurs peu confortables
- autonomie en cas de sollicitations
- n'exploite pas totalement le SoC
- cartes micro SD ne peuvent être formatées comme du stockage interne
- appareil photo en faible luminosité
En test : le Nokia 5.1 Plus smartphone. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par HMD Global.
En test : le Nokia 5.1 Plus smartphone. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par HMD Global.

Le Nokia 5.1 Plus est un smartphone équilibré. Il n’a pas de gros défaut, même s’il ne tire pas le meilleur parti de son SoC - ce dont la plupart des gens ne se rendront pas compte, sauf à le comparer directement à un appareil comme l’Umidigi Z2 Pro. Le 5.1 Plus ne fait rien non plus pour se démarquer du Nokia 6.1, même si son design moderne pourra en attirer certains - c’est avant tout une question de goût.

Le Nokia 5.1 Plus est un smartphone équilibré et abordable, qui ne fait pas de faux-pas.

Ses qualités sont nombreuses : il est élégant et robuste, possède un SoC puissant, beaucoup de RAM, un appareil photo correct, et propose une expérience Android pure.

Au final, les qualités du Nokia 5.1 Plus surpassent ses défauts, ce qui en fait un appareil que l’on peut clairement recommander. Il y a de petits défauts comme l’impossibilité de formater la carte micro SD en tant que stockage interne, ou le SoC qui n’est pas totalement exploité, mais cela n’empêche pas le Nokia 5.1 Plus d’être un excellent smartphone à prix contenu.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Nokia 5.1 Plus - 01/04/2019 v6
Florian Schaar

Châssis
90%
Clavier
65 / 75 → 86%
Dispositif de pointage
92%
Connectivité
44 / 60 → 73%
Poids
91%
Autonomie
96%
Écran
85%
Performances en jeu
42 / 63 → 66%
Performances dans les applications
44 / 70 → 63%
Chauffe
91%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Appareil photo
70%
Moyenne
75%
85%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du smartphone Nokia 5.1 Plus (Nokia 5X)
Florian Schaar, 2019-01-10 (Update: 2019-01-10)