Notebookcheck

Test de l'Oppo Reno2 Z : pseudo quatre capteurs photo, des qualités et des défauts

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduit par Prévots), 03/23/2020

Smartphone MediaTek Helio P90. L’Oppo Reno2 Z est une version légèrement bas de gamme du Reno2. Mais nos mesures indiquent de grosses différences entre les deux appareils – plus ce que l’on pourrait penser au premier abord, vu les spécifications. Dans ce test de ce smartphone du milieu de gamme, nous allons voir sir le Reno2 Z mérite toujours une recommandation.

Oppo Reno2 Z (Reno Gamme)
Processeur
Mediatek Helio P90
Carte graphique
PowerVR GM9446
Mémoire
8192 Mo 
Écran
6.5 pouces 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 396 PPP, capacitif, AMOLED, brillant: oui, 60 Hz
Disque dur
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 Go 
, 108 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD (256GB), (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: gyroscope, capteur de mouvement, boussole, capteur de proximité, OTG (seul, pas de carte SD) ; GNSS : GPS, Glonass, Galileo et BeiDou
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM : 850 / 900 / 1 800 / 1 900MHz, WCDMA : bandes 1 / 2 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 8 / 19, FDD-LTE : bandes 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 7 / 8 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 26 / 28, TD-LTE : bandes 38 / 39 / 40 / 41, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 9.01 x 161.8 x 75.8
Batterie
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 48 MPix Quadri : 48 MP (f/1,7, 26 mm, 1 / 2,0", 0,8 µm) + 8MP (f/2,2, 13mm, 1 / 4", 1,12µm) + 2MP (f/2,4, 1 / 5", 1,75 µm) + 2MP (f/2,4, 1 / 5", 1,75µm), API Camera2 : Full.
Appareil photo secondaire: 16 MPix Pop-up (f/2,0, 26 mm, 1 / 3,1", 1,0 µm)
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, câble USB C, écouteurs, chargeur, guide de démarrage rapide, outil pour carte SIM, protection d'écran, étui de protection, ColorOS, 24 Mois Garantie, DAS (tête) : 0,78 W/kg, DAS (corps) : 1,18 W/kg, Widevine L1, fanless
Poids
195 g, Alimentation: 82 g
Prix
380 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Appareils du comparatif

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Drive
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
79 %
03/20
Oppo Reno2 Z
Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446
195 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.5"2340x1080
81 %
10/19
Oppo Reno2
SD 730G, Adreno 618
189 g256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.5"2400x1080
82 %
03/20
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
208 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
81 %
07/19
Xiaomi Mi 9T
SD 730, Adreno 618
191 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.39"2340x1080
80 %
01/20
Samsung Galaxy A51
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.5"2400x1080
79 %
11/19
Nokia 7.2
SD 660, Adreno 512
180 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
Test du Oppo Reno2 Z.

Size Comparison

165.3 mm 76.6 mm 8.79 mm 208 g161.8 mm 75.8 mm 9.01 mm 195 g160 mm 74.3 mm 9 mm 189 g159.92 mm 75.15 mm 8.25 mm 180 g158.5 mm 73.6 mm 7.9 mm 172 g156.7 mm 74.3 mm 8.8 mm 191 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
687 (min: 345, max: 697) MBit/s ∼100% +111%
Oppo Reno2
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
618 (min: 532, max: 671) MBit/s ∼90% +90%
Nokia 7.2
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
344 (min: 336, max: 352) MBit/s ∼50% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Adreno 618, SD 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
333 (min: 297, max: 343) MBit/s ∼48% +2%
Oppo Reno2 Z
PowerVR GM9446, Helio P90, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
325 (min: 167, max: 346) MBit/s ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
298 (min: 185, max: 350) MBit/s ∼43% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1014, n=504)
244 MBit/s ∼36% -25%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Oppo Reno2
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
355 (min: 187, max: 387) MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (min: 280, max: 399) MBit/s ∼96% +1%
Oppo Reno2 Z
PowerVR GM9446, Helio P90, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
337 (min: 165, max: 344) MBit/s ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
297 (min: 189, max: 335) MBit/s ∼84% -12%
Nokia 7.2
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
296 (min: 223, max: 308) MBit/s ∼83% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Adreno 618, SD 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
293 (min: 161, max: 346) MBit/s ∼83% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 966, n=504)
227 MBit/s ∼64% -33%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø316 (167-346)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø332 (165-344)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Oppo Reno2 Z
GPS Oppo Reno2 Z
GPS Oppo Reno2 Z
GPS Oppo Reno2 Z
GPS Oppo Reno2 Z
GPS Oppo Reno2 Z

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
48.2 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
60.7 ∆E
47.6 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
71.1 ∆E
42 ∆E
41.5 ∆E
73.7 ∆E
68.5 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Reno2 Z: 44.37 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 73.69 ∆E
ColorChecker
22.3 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
20 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Reno2 Z: 12.48 ∆E min: 3.12 - max: 22.67 ∆E
Oppo Reno2 Z - Mire de test.
Mire de test.
Oppo Reno2 Z - Mire de test zoomée.
Oppo Reno2 Z - Mire de test de nuit.
385
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 406 cd/m² Moyenne: 393.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.08 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 95 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 387 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
Gamma: 2.27
Oppo Reno2 Z
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5
Oppo Reno2
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
LCD IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Mi 9T
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Samsung Galaxy A51
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5
Nokia 7.2
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Screen
41%
49%
46%
38%
16%
Brightness middle
387
679
75%
658
70%
589
52%
589
52%
604
56%
Brightness
394
683
73%
643
63%
589
49%
589
49%
593
51%
Brightness Distribution
95
98
3%
93
-2%
96
1%
94
-1%
92
-3%
Black Level *
0.49
0.4
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.9
3.5
29%
1.8
63%
2.5
49%
2.22
55%
5.1
-4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.7
6.8
30%
4.4
55%
4.9
49%
8.24
15%
10.3
-6%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.5
4.2
35%
3.8
42%
1.6
75%
2.6
60%
6.4
2%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.27 97%
2.22 99%
2.24 98%
2.111 104%
2.23 99%
CCT
7193 90%
6532 100%
6255 104%
6544 99%
6508 100%
8149 80%
Contrast
1343
1510

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 250 Hz ≤ 99 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 250 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 99 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 250 Hz est relativement faible, les personnes les plus sensibles devraient percevoir un scintillement et être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire accrue (avec le niveau de luminosité indiqué)

En comparaison, 50 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 17159 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
3.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 2 ms hausse
↘ 1.6 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 2 ms hausse
↘ 2 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (39.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5.1
Vulkan Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
118 Points ∼7%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
812 Points ∼48% +588%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1035 Points ∼61% +777%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
118 Points ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 4043, n=29)
1684 Points ∼100% +1327%
OpenCL Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
Points ∼0%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
1080 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1212 Points ∼74%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=27)
1636 Points ∼100%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1534 Points ∼78%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
1762 Points ∼89% +15%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1520 Points ∼77% -1%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
1534 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (782 - 3531, n=37)
1973 Points ∼100% +29%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
416 Points ∼72%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
547 Points ∼95% +31%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
569 Points ∼98% +37%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
416 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (145 - 1342, n=37)
578 Points ∼100% +39%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
5541 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8591 Points ∼100% +55%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7795 Points ∼91% +41%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
5541 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=336)
4742 Points ∼55% -14%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
6162 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6213 Points ∼90% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6871 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
6162 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13279, n=396)
4795 Points ∼70% -22%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1994 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2689 Points ∼100% +35%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2527 Points ∼94% +27%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
1994 Points ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=396)
1454 Points ∼54% -27%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
9654 Points ∼97%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
7134 Points ∼71% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9989 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7533 Points ∼75% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5649 Points ∼57% -41%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5917 Points ∼59% -39%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
9654 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=438)
5517 Points ∼55% -43%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
13156 Points ∼100%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
9145 Points ∼70% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
10689 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9049 Points ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6416 Points ∼49% -51%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
13156 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=601)
6014 Points ∼46% -54%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2898 Points ∼100%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2621 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2588 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2786 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2161 Points ∼75% -25%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2207 Points ∼76% -24%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
2898 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=105)
2672 Points ∼92% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1333 Points ∼42%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2155 Points ∼68% +62%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3167 Points ∼100% +138%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1917 Points ∼61% +44%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1438 Points ∼45% +8%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1141 Points ∼36% -14%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
1333 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=105)
2795 Points ∼88% +110%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1509 Points ∼51%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2244 Points ∼75% +49%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2978 Points ∼100% +97%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2060 Points ∼69% +37%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1554 Points ∼52% +3%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1278 Points ∼43% -15%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
1509 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=105)
2532 Points ∼85% +68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2699 Points ∼83%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3162 Points ∼98% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2965 Points ∼91% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3241 Points ∼100% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2311 Points ∼71% -14%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2693 Points ∼83% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
2699 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=444)
2043 Points ∼63% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2217 Points ∼62%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2434 Points ∼68% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3554 Points ∼100% +60%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2176 Points ∼61% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1530 Points ∼43% -31%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1256 Points ∼35% -43%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
2217 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9345, n=444)
1882 Points ∼53% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2365 Points ∼69%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2565 Points ∼75% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3412 Points ∼100% +44%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2347 Points ∼69% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1654 Points ∼48% -30%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1425 Points ∼42% -40%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
2365 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 7982, n=445)
1748 Points ∼51% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2575 Points ∼78%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3112 Points ∼94% +21%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3198 Points ∼97% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3296 Points ∼100% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2336 Points ∼71% -9%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2640 Points ∼80% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
2575 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5209, n=473)
1954 Points ∼59% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1086 Points ∼20%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3647 Points ∼68% +236%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5367 Points ∼100% +394%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3316 Points ∼62% +205%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1993 Points ∼37% +84%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2007 Points ∼37% +85%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
1086 Points ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=473)
2498 Points ∼47% +130%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1245 Points ∼27%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3513 Points ∼76% +182%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4643 Points ∼100% +273%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3312 Points ∼71% +166%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2060 Points ∼44% +65%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2120 Points ∼46% +70%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
1245 Points ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=473)
2105 Points ∼45% +69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2499 Points ∼77%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3088 Points ∼95% +24%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3256 Points ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3227 Points ∼99% +29%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2217 Points ∼68% -11%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2649 Points ∼81% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
2499 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4909, n=524)
1946 Points ∼60% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2167 Points ∼66%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2243 Points ∼68% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3287 Points ∼100% +52%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2008 Points ∼61% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1473 Points ∼45% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1181 Points ∼36% -46%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
2167 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=524)
1571 Points ∼48% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
224 Points ∼7%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2388 Points ∼73% +966%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3277 Points ∼100% +1363%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2192 Points ∼67% +879%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1592 Points ∼49% +611%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1347 Points ∼41% +501%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
224 Points ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7012, n=525)
1504 Points ∼46% +571%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2486 Points ∼72%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3075 Points ∼90% +24%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3432 Points ∼100% +38%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3239 Points ∼94% +30%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2225 Points ∼65% -10%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2632 Points ∼77% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
2486 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=565)
1814 Points ∼53% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1076 Points ∼21%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3504 Points ∼69% +226%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5115 Points ∼100% +375%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3184 Points ∼62% +196%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2027 Points ∼40% +88%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1913 Points ∼37% +78%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
1076 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11488, n=564)
2053 Points ∼40% +91%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1248 Points ∼27%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3399 Points ∼73% +172%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4654 Points ∼100% +273%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3196 Points ∼69% +156%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2068 Points ∼44% +66%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2037 Points ∼44% +63%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
1248 Points ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8866, n=567)
1774 Points ∼38% +42%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
23188 Points ∼100%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
14820 Points ∼64% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23203 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
19433 Points ∼84% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
20393 Points ∼88% -12%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
18094 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
23188 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=715)
14596 Points ∼63% -37%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
27134 Points ∼40%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
50829 Points ∼74% +87%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
68634 Points ∼100% +153%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
46605 Points ∼68% +72%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
25086 Points ∼37% -8%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
28898 Points ∼42% +7%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
27134 Points ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=713)
23210 Points ∼34% -14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
26132 Points ∼55%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
33007 Points ∼69% +26%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
47824 Points ∼100% +83%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
35557 Points ∼74% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23866 Points ∼50% -9%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
25513 Points ∼53% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
26132 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=713)
18684 Points ∼39% -29%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
57 fps ∼60%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
85 fps ∼89% +49%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
95 fps ∼100% +67%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
77 fps ∼81% +35%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
46 fps ∼48% -19%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
50 fps ∼53% -12%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
57 fps ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=732)
40.1 fps ∼42% -30%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
49 fps ∼57%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
60 fps ∼70% +22%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
86 fps ∼100% +76%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
58 fps ∼67% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
40 fps ∼47% -18%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
46 fps ∼53% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
49 fps ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=741)
29 fps ∼34% -41%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
27 fps ∼50%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
42 fps ∼78% +56%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
54 fps ∼100% +100%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼70% +41%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
24 fps ∼44% -11%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
23 fps ∼43% -15%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
27 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=636)
23.3 fps ∼43% -14%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
20 fps ∼42%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
36 fps ∼75% +80%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
48 fps ∼100% +140%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼71% +70%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼48% +15%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
21 fps ∼44% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
20 fps ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=645)
20.2 fps ∼42% +1%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
18 fps ∼49%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼81% +67%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
37 fps ∼100% +106%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼73% +50%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
15 fps ∼41% -17%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
15 fps ∼41% -17%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
18 fps ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=501)
18.9 fps ∼51% +5%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
12 fps ∼36%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
26 fps ∼79% +117%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
33 fps ∼100% +175%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
24 fps ∼73% +100%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼42% +17%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
13 fps ∼39% +8%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
12 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=503)
17.5 fps ∼53% +46%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
3.5 fps ∼35%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps ∼99% +186%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.9 fps ∼88% +154%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9.3 fps ∼92% +166%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.5 fps ∼54% +57%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
4.9 fps ∼49% +40%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
3.5 fps ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=236)
10.1 fps ∼100% +189%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
4.3 fps ∼33%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
6.7 fps ∼52% +56%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼100% +202%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6.1 fps ∼47% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼27% -19%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
3.2 fps ∼25% -26%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
4.3 fps ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 39, n=234)
7.1 fps ∼55% +65%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
7.6 fps ∼36%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼76% +111%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼100% +176%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼71% +97%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.1 fps ∼43% +20%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
7.7 fps ∼37% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
7.6 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=240)
15 fps ∼71% +97%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
8.4 fps ∼37%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼78% +114%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23 fps ∼100% +174%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼70% +90%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼43% +19%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.7 fps ∼38% +4%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
8.4 fps ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=240)
16.7 fps ∼73% +99%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
8.7 fps ∼41%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼81% +95%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼100% +141%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼76% +84%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼48% +15%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
9 fps ∼43% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
8.7 fps ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=426)
12.8 fps ∼61% +47%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
7.7 fps ∼41%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps ∼79% +95%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
19 fps ∼100% +147%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13 fps ∼68% +69%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.6 fps ∼45% +12%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.2 fps ∼43% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
7.7 fps ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=430)
11.4 fps ∼60% +48%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
217799 Points ∼73%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
260154 Points ∼87% +19%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
298925 Points ∼100% +37%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
181295 Points ∼61% -17%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
157877 Points ∼53% -28%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
217799 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (84645 - 599843, n=53)
281636 Points ∼94% +29%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
10.66 (min: 5.9, max: 30.7) fps ∼36%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23.1 (min: 11.15, max: 38.98) fps ∼77% +117%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16.91 fps ∼57% +59%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
10.7 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.24 - 773, n=72)
29.9 fps ∼100% +180%
Vulkan Medium Native (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
8.8 (min: 5.8, max: 18.9) fps ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13.56 fps ∼84% +54%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
8.8 fps ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=63)
16.1 fps ∼100% +83%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
8.6 (min: 5.9, max: 18.6) fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21.97 (min: 12.98, max: 44.43) fps ∼100% +155%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15.51 fps ∼71% +80%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
8.6 fps ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=61)
20.1 fps ∼91% +134%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1309 Points ∼95%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
1190 Points ∼86% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1378 Points ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1099 Points ∼80% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
1309 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=668)
778 Points ∼56% -41%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2603 Points ∼51%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3858 Points ∼76% +48%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5087 Points ∼100% +95%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3559 Points ∼70% +37%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2168 Points ∼43% -17%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
2603 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=668)
2206 Points ∼43% -15%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2475 Points ∼47%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3678 Points ∼70% +49%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5278 Points ∼100% +113%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
4646 Points ∼88% +88%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1605 Points ∼30% -35%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
2475 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=668)
1619 Points ∼31% -35%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
6275 Points ∼91%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
6751 Points ∼98% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6870 Points ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6760 Points ∼98% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4738 Points ∼69% -24%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
6275 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=668)
3145 Points ∼46% -50%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Reno2 Z
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2937 Points ∼74%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3268 Points ∼82% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3990 Points ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3329 Points ∼83% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
634 Points ∼16% -78%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
2937 Points ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=668)
1580 Points ∼40% -46%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
53.145 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
47.131 Points ∼89% +8%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
45.819 Points ∼86% +5%
Oppo Reno2 Z (Chrome 80)
43.532 Points ∼82%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
43.5 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=133)
37.1 Points ∼70% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
27.681 Points ∼52% -36%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
94.778 Points ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
87.488 Points ∼92% +15%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
83.953 Points ∼89% +11%
Oppo Reno2 Z (Chrome 80)
75.936 Points ∼80%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
75.9 Points ∼80% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
51.257 Points ∼54% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=564)
43.6 Points ∼46% -43%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
54.9 runs/min ∼100% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
46.46 runs/min ∼85% +12%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
43.6 runs/min ∼79% +5%
Oppo Reno2 Z (Chrome 80)
41.5 runs/min ∼76%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
41.5 runs/min ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=121)
40.6 runs/min ∼74% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
29.1 runs/min ∼53% -30%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Oppo Reno2 Z (Chrome 80)
91 Points ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
91 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
86 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
80 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=196)
67.6 Points ∼74% -26%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
66 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
57 Points ∼63% -37%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
18809 Points ∼100% +29%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
17501 Points ∼93% +20%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
17345 Points ∼92% +19%
Oppo Reno2 Z (Chrome 80)
14607 Points ∼78%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
14607 Points ∼78% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
10194 Points ∼54% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=725)
7128 Points ∼38% -51%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=750)
10258 ms * ∼100% -231%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
4375.1 ms * ∼43% -41%
Oppo Reno2 Z (Chrome 80)
3098.4 ms * ∼30%
Average Mediatek Helio P90
3098 ms * ∼30% -0%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
3054.3 ms * ∼30% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
2787 ms * ∼27% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
2563.9 ms * ∼25% +17%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Oppo Reno2 ZOppo Reno2Xiaomi Redmi K30 5GXiaomi Mi 9TSamsung Galaxy A51Nokia 7.2Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
20%
91%
67%
69%
7%
53%
-6%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
28.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
53.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
87%
60.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
110%
63.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
124%
54.8 (28.6 - 70.2, n=13)
92%
50.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=470)
75%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
45.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
74.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62%
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59%
83.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
81%
72.2 (46 - 86, n=13)
57%
68.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=470)
49%
Random Write 4KB
27.33
22
-20%
100.99
270%
107.82
295%
104.4
282%
13.38
-51%
81.5 (13.5 - 180, n=17)
198%
26.1 (0.14 - 259, n=802)
-5%
Random Read 4KB
148.87
144.24
-3%
96.8
-35%
128.65
-14%
110.8
-26%
79.64
-47%
121 (88.4 - 173, n=17)
-19%
51.3 (1.59 - 226, n=802)
-66%
Sequential Write 256KB
198.32
201.78
2%
312.76
58%
179.19
-10%
184.9
-7%
161.4
-19%
193 (143 - 257, n=17)
-3%
107 (2.99 - 729, n=802)
-46%
Sequential Read 256KB
519.1
469.31
-10%
889.67
71%
492.74
-5%
496.1
-4%
290.83
-44%
491 (409 - 733, n=17)
-5%
295 (12.1 - 1781, n=802)
-43%
PUBG mobile
01020304050Tooltip
; Balanced: Ø39.7 (31-41)
; HD: Ø29.2 (15-31)
Asphalt 9 Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø29.2 (18-31)
; Standard / low: Ø28.5 (20-31)
Dead Trigger 2
0102030405060Tooltip
: Ø59.8 (59-60)
 31.5 °C31.1 °C30.1 °C 
 31.9 °C31.8 °C29.7 °C 
 32.5 °C32.7 °C29.5 °C 
Maximum: 32.7 °C
Moyenne: 31.2 °C
27.5 °C29.1 °C29.1 °C
28.3 °C29.3 °C29.9 °C
27.7 °C30.1 °C30.6 °C
Maximum: 30.6 °C
Moyenne: 29.1 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  26.3 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.133.32532.925.93127.126.44030.528.45033.833.66325.926.98023.629.110024.626.912520.432.916019.543.920018.744.725017.255.431516.558.340014.459.750016.362.763015.36780014.666.110001474.3125014.974.9160014.27420001576.3250014.777.6315014.577.8400014.378500014.677.6630015.176.480001576.31000014.971.61250015.359.6160001650.6SPL2787.6N0.970.1median 15median 67Delta1.312.337.22924.428.927.324.822.723.23333.526.72623.426.42125.517.62818.245.514.744.51549.81653.715.756.314.461.614.362.514.26914.272.513.874.214.974.814.574.914.675.214.374.814.47614.976.414.473.814.6731573.815.167.515.55726.785.90.863.8median 14.7median 690.611.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Reno2 ZXiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Reno2 Z audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.19 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.57 / 1.2 / 1.33 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 3.13 / 5.46 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oppo Reno2 Z
4000 mAh
Oppo Reno2
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Nokia 7.2
3500 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P90
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-25%
-70%
12%
-44%
-62%
0%
-39%
Idle Minimum *
0.57
0.7
-23%
0.66
-16%
0.54
5%
0.9
-58%
0.77
-35%
0.57
-0%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=818)
-54%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.25
-4%
2.37
-98%
0.95
21%
1.7
-42%
2.32
-93%
1.2
-0%
1.741 (0.6 - 6.2, n=817)
-45%
Idle Maximum *
1.33
1.36
-2%
2.42
-82%
1.08
19%
1.8
-35%
2.41
-81%
1.33
-0%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=818)
-53%
Load Average *
3.13
5.38
-72%
6.8
-117%
2.7
14%
5.2
-66%
4.44
-42%
3.13
-0%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=812)
-31%
Load Maximum *
5.46
6.71
-23%
7.5
-37%
5.4
1%
6.6
-21%
8.79
-61%
5.46
-0%
5.99 (1.2 - 14.2, n=812)
-10%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
9h 38min
Oppo Reno2 Z
4000 mAh
Oppo Reno2
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Nokia 7.2
3500 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3
578
616
7%
802
39%
991
71%
698
21%
570
-1%

Points positifs

+ design
+ stockage UFS
+ double SIM + lecteur SD
+ chauffe
+ nombre de bandes LTE

Points négatifs

- Wifi (vitesse en réception)
- luminosité
- qualité de construction
- vitesse du lecteur de carte micro SD
- capteur 2 MP sans vrai but

Verdict - Reno2 Z with Mixed Results

En test : le Oppo Reno2 Z. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par :
En test : le Oppo Reno2 Z. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par :

Le Reno2 Z n’est pas un mauvais smartphone, mais l’exécution par Oppo manque de conviction. Si le design est réussi, des progrès sont possibles en ce qui concerne la qualité de construction. L’écran OLED possède quant à lui un bon contraste, mais il est plutôt sombre et ses couleurs ne sont pas assez fidèles.

Même si le Reno2 Z est un bon smartphone du milieu de gamme, des améliorations sont à faire.

La qualité d’appel est bonne, même si la force du signal du Reno2 Z est en retrait face à la concurrence. La stockage UFS est assez rapide, mais pas le lecteur de carte SD. Le processeur Mediatek est plus que suffisant pour les tâches classiques du quotidien, mais également en retrait face à la concurrence, surtout en ce qui concerne la partie graphique.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Oppo Reno2 Z - 03/09/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Châssis
86%
Clavier
67 / 75 → 90%
Dispositif de pointage
89%
Connectivité
48 / 70 → 68%
Poids
88%
Autonomie
88%
Écran
81%
Performances en jeu
20 / 64 → 32%
Performances dans les applications
66 / 86 → 77%
Chauffe
95%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Appareil photo
62%
Moyenne
74%
79%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test de l'Oppo Reno2 Z : pseudo quatre capteurs photo, des qualités et des défauts
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-03-23 (Update: 2020-03-23)