Test du Blackview BV9800 Pro : smartphone durci avec appareil photo infrarouge

Name: Blackview BV9800 Pro
Brand: Blackview

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (traduit par Prévots), 02/04/2020

Robuste et autonome. Les smartphones de Blackview peuvent être assez fragiles. Mais quand on en vient à ses smartphones durcis, le fabriquant repousse les limites. Non seulement le châssis épais paraît costaud, mais il cache aussi des composants efficaces.

Exemplaire de test fourni par Blackview

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Blackview BV9800 Pro (BV Gamme)

Processeur

Mediatek Helio P70

Carte graphique

ARM Mali-G72 MP3

Mémoire

6144 Mo

Écran

6.3 pouces 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 409 PPP, capacitif, IPS, brillant: oui

Disque dur

128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 Go

, 116 Go libres

Connexions

1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: USB C, jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD (FAT, FAT32, jusqu'à 256 Go), 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: capteur de proximité , capteur de mouvement, gyroscope, capteur magnétique, baromètre, capteur à effet Hall, e-boussole, IR, radio FM

Réseau

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.1, 2G GMS (B2(1 900)/B3(1 800)/B5(850)/B8(900) ), 3G WCDMA/TDSCDMA (B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19 / B34 / B39), 4G LTE FDD/TDD/C2K (B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B7 / B8 / B12 / B13 / B17 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B25 / B26 / B28A/B28B/B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Taille

Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 14.8 x 168.5 x 81

Batterie

6580 mAh Lithium-Polymère

Charging

wireless charging

Système d'exploitation

Android 9.0 Pie

Appareil photo

Appareil photo primaire: 48 MPix 48 MP (Sony) + 5 MP (capteur thermique) + caméra thermique (FLIR), API Camera2 "limité"
Appareil photo secondaire: 16 MPix f/2,0

Fonctionnalités additionnelles

Haut-parleurs: 2 haut-parleurs, Clavier: virtuel, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, chargeur USB, câble USB C, écouteurs stéréos, protection d'écran, outil pour carte SIM, 12 Mois Garantie, DAS (tête) : 0,461 W/kg, DAS (corps) : 0,959 W/kg, Widevine L3 DRM, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof

Poids

322 g, Alimentation: 76 g

Prix

500 euros

Liens

Blackview Page d'accueil

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

voir toutes les spécifications

Note	Date	Modèle	Poids	Drive	Taille	Résolution
77%	02/20	Blackview BV9800 Pro Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3	322 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.3"	2340x1080
77%	09/18	CAT S61 630, Adreno 508	250 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	5.2"	1920x1080
76%	08/19	Ulefone Armor 6E Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3	268 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.2"	2246x1080
79%	05/19	RugGear RG850 430, Adreno 505	209 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	5.99"	1440x720
77%	10/19	Blackview BV9700 Pro Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3	283 g	128 GB NVMe	5.84"	2280x1080

Comparaison des tailles

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
CAT S61 Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	339 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB eMMC Flash	315 (min: 204, max: 334) MBit/s ∼93%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1014, n=489)	235 MBit/s ∼69% -25%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB NVMe	64 (min: 46, max: 76) MBit/s ∼19% -80%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 64 GB eMMC Flash	58.7 (min: 57, max: 60) MBit/s ∼17% -81%
RugGear RG850 Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	45.5 (min: 36, max: 51) MBit/s ∼13% -86%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
CAT S61 Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	341 MBit/s ∼100% +13%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB eMMC Flash	302 (min: 173, max: 415) MBit/s ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 966, n=489)	221 MBit/s ∼65% -27%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB NVMe	55 (min: 50, max: 58) MBit/s ∼16% -82%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 64 GB eMMC Flash	52.3 (min: 48, max: 56) MBit/s ∼15% -83%
RugGear RG850 Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	29.5 (min: 17, max: 46) MBit/s ∼9% -90%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø313 (204-334)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø302 (173-415)

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

Cliquer pour charger les images

Cliquer pour charger les images

Cliquer pour charger les images

29.3 ∆E

52.5 ∆E

38.3 ∆E

37.3 ∆E

43.5 ∆E

62.4 ∆E

52.4 ∆E

33.5 ∆E

39.1 ∆E

27.1 ∆E

63.6 ∆E

63.4 ∆E

27.9 ∆E

47.7 ∆E

34.5 ∆E

74.8 ∆E

41 ∆E

42.9 ∆E

84.1 ∆E

69.6 ∆E

51.6 ∆E

36.6 ∆E

24.1 ∆E

13.8 ∆E

ColorChecker Blackview BV9800 Pro: 45.45 ∆E min: 13.76 - max: 84.1 ∆E

7.5 ∆E

9.9 ∆E

11.2 ∆E

8.6 ∆E

10 ∆E

7.1 ∆E

9.8 ∆E

13.8 ∆E

10.6 ∆E

2.6 ∆E

5.8 ∆E

7.7 ∆E

10 ∆E

9.5 ∆E

10.1 ∆E

4.6 ∆E

8.7 ∆E

6.1 ∆E

3.3 ∆E

7.1 ∆E

8.9 ∆E

2.5 ∆E

7 ∆E

8.8 ∆E

ColorChecker Blackview BV9800 Pro: 7.97 ∆E min: 2.45 - max: 13.85 ∆E

Blackview BV9800 Pro - Mire de test zoomée.

Blackview BV9800 Pro - Mire de test (1 Lux).


519 cd/m²	528 cd/m²	498 cd/m²
531 cd/m²	511 cd/m²	495 cd/m²
531 cd/m²	489 cd/m²	474 cd/m²

Homogénéité de la luminosité

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 531 cd/m² Moyenne: 508.4 cd/m² Minimum: 20.37 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 89 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 511 cd/m²
Contraste: 1762:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 10.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.08

	Blackview BV9800 Pro IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3	CAT S61 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2	Ulefone Armor 6E IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2	RugGear RG850 IPS, 1440x720, 5.99	Blackview BV9700 Pro IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
Screen		-5%	5%	-36%	8%
Brightness middle	511	693 36%	357 -30%	444 -13%	521 2%
Brightness	508	672 32%	352 -31%	469 -8%	525 3%
Brightness Distribution	89	90 1%	91 2%	88 -1%	87 -2%
Black Level *	0.29	0.77 -166%	0.24 17%	0.62 -114%	0.29 -0%
Contrast	1762	900 -49%	1488 -16%	716 -59%	1797 2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	8.1	5.23 35%	6.08 25%	9.75 -20%	6.22 23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	15.2	10.18 33%	9.46 38%	22.4 -47%	9.5 37%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	10.9	6.9 37%	7 36%	13.5 -24%	11 -1%
Gamma	2.08 ^106%	2.834 ^78%	2.292 ^96%	2.736 ^80%	0.558 ^394%
CCT	9859 ^66%	7137 ^91%	7695 ^84%	9287 ^70%	8077 ^80%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 13646 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.

↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc
32 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 10.8 ms hausse
32 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 21.2 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (24.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
64.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 30.8 ms hausse
64.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 34 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (39.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1191 Points ∼86%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (626 - 1191, n=3)	825 Points ∼59% -31%
Average of class Smartphone (143 - 3794, n=43)	1387 Points ∼100% +16%
OpenCL Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1259 Points ∼72%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (1214 - 1259, n=2)	1237 Points ∼70% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (183 - 4593, n=51)	1757 Points ∼100% +40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1399 Points ∼76%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (1155 - 1458, n=3)	1337 Points ∼72% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (807 - 3575, n=63)	1848 Points ∼100% +32%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	295 Points ∼56%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (295 - 299, n=3)	297 Points ∼56% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 1344, n=63)	526 Points ∼100% +78%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	8074 Points ∼99%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	4748 Points ∼58% -41%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8142 Points ∼100% +1%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	3596 Points ∼44% -55%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	8046 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (5992 - 8142, n=7)	7593 Points ∼93% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 11690, n=425)	5426 Points ∼67% -33%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	11419 Points ∼97%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	5548 Points ∼47% -51%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	11141 Points ∼95% -2%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	4290 Points ∼36% -62%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	11781 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (7160 - 11781, n=7)	10421 Points ∼88% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 15193, n=588)	5901 Points ∼50% -48%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2585 Points ∼98%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2355 Points ∼89% -9%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	1835 Points ∼69% -29%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2587 Points ∼98% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (2350 - 2587, n=6)	2472 Points ∼94% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1740 - 15735, n=96)	2641 Points ∼100% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1095 Points ∼42%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1030 Points ∼40% -6%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	306 Points ∼12% -72%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1098 Points ∼42% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (951 - 1107, n=6)	1051 Points ∼40% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (203 - 14536, n=96)	2598 Points ∼100% +137%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1256 Points ∼53%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1177 Points ∼49% -6%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	376 Points ∼16% -70%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1259 Points ∼53% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (1096 - 1264, n=6)	1204 Points ∼50% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (253 - 14786, n=96)	2391 Points ∼100% +90%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2883 Points ∼94%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	1720 Points ∼56% -40%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2608 Points ∼85% -10%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	1121 Points ∼37% -61%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	3055 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (2309 - 3055, n=7)	2705 Points ∼89% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 5576, n=432)	2014 Points ∼66% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1093 Points ∼60%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	787 Points ∼43% -28%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1081 Points ∼60% -1%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	305 Points ∼17% -72%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1096 Points ∼60% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (941 - 1096, n=7)	1053 Points ∼58% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 8374, n=432)	1813 Points ∼100% +66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1268 Points ∼75%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	895 Points ∼53% -29%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1243 Points ∼74% -2%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	364 Points ∼22% -71%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1278 Points ∼76% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (1098 - 1278, n=7)	1217 Points ∼72% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 6916, n=433)	1690 Points ∼100% +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	3029 Points ∼97%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	1766 Points ∼57% -42%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2585 Points ∼83% -15%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	1148 Points ∼37% -62%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	3116 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (2295 - 3116, n=7)	2741 Points ∼88% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 5133, n=461)	1925 Points ∼62% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1606 Points ∼66%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	1297 Points ∼54% -19%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1580 Points ∼65% -2%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	529 Points ∼22% -67%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1615 Points ∼67% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (1427 - 1615, n=7)	1563 Points ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 20154, n=461)	2420 Points ∼100% +51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1793 Points ∼88%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	1378 Points ∼67% -23%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1729 Points ∼85% -4%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	601 Points ∼29% -66%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1809 Points ∼89% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (1591 - 1809, n=7)	1726 Points ∼84% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (88 - 10427, n=461)	2044 Points ∼100% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2869 Points ∼100%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	1711 Points ∼60% -40%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2511 Points ∼88% -12%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	1116 Points ∼39% -61%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2842 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (2272 - 2869, n=7)	2607 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (435 - 4909, n=512)	1923 Points ∼67% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1104 Points ∼73%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	708 Points ∼47% -36%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1093 Points ∼72% -1%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	252 Points ∼17% -77%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1111 Points ∼74% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (884 - 1125, n=7)	1060 Points ∼70% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 7150, n=512)	1510 Points ∼100% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1279 Points ∼88%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	814 Points ∼56% -36%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1250 Points ∼86% -2%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	304 Points ∼21% -76%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1285 Points ∼88% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (1029 - 1293, n=7)	1221 Points ∼84% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 6319, n=513)	1457 Points ∼100% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2856 Points ∼99%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	1729 Points ∼60% -39%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2459 Points ∼85% -14%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	1128 Points ∼39% -61%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2895 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (2306 - 2895, n=7)	2608 Points ∼90% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 4900, n=553)	1789 Points ∼62% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1278 Points ∼64%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	1234 Points ∼62% -3%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1253 Points ∼63% -2%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	522 Points ∼26% -59%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1285 Points ∼65% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (1253 - 1608, n=7)	1389 Points ∼70% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 11302, n=552)	1989 Points ∼100% +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1457 Points ∼85%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	1318 Points ∼76% -10%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1406 Points ∼82% -4%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	593 Points ∼34% -59%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1466 Points ∼85% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (1406 - 1767, n=7)	1546 Points ∼90% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8338, n=555)	1724 Points ∼100% +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	17113 Points ∼91%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	12945 Points ∼69% -24%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	9051 Points ∼48% -47%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	18798 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (15003 - 20711, n=6)	18798 Points ∼100% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 45072, n=708)	14454 Points ∼77% -16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	20321 Points ∼89%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	18375 Points ∼81% -10%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	9704 Points ∼43% -52%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	20307 Points ∼89% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (17412 - 20403, n=6)	19416 Points ∼85% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 209204, n=706)	22753 Points ∼100% +12%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	19508 Points ∼98%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	16808 Points ∼84% -14%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	9551 Points ∼48% -51%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	19951 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (18037 - 20433, n=6)	19208 Points ∼96% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 97276, n=706)	18376 Points ∼92% -6%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	42 fps ∼98%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	29 fps ∼67% -31%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	34 fps ∼79% -19%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	43 fps ∼100% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (34 - 43, n=6)	37.8 fps ∼88% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=723)	39 fps ∼91% -7%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	38 fps ∼97%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	29 fps ∼74% -24%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	34 fps ∼87% -11%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	39 fps ∼100% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (29 - 46, n=6)	36.3 fps ∼93% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 120, n=732)	28.7 fps ∼74% -24%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	23 fps ∼100%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	14 fps ∼61% -39%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	18 fps ∼78% -22%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	23 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (18 - 23, n=6)	21.2 fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 175, n=627)	22.6 fps ∼98% -2%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	21 fps ∼96%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	13 fps ∼60% -38%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	17 fps ∼78% -19%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	21 fps ∼96% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (17 - 35, n=6)	21.8 fps ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 115, n=636)	19.9 fps ∼91% -5%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	14 fps ∼77%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	9.7 fps ∼53% -31%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	12 fps ∼66% -14%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	14 fps ∼77% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (6.9 - 14, n=6)	12.2 fps ∼67% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=492)	18.3 fps ∼100% +31%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	12 fps ∼70%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	5.3 fps ∼31% -56%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	11 fps ∼64% -8%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	13 fps ∼76% +8%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (11 - 25, n=6)	14 fps ∼81% +17%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=494)	17.2 fps ∼100% +43%

GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	4.6 fps ∼47%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	3.1 fps ∼32% -33%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4.7 fps ∼48% +2%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	4.9 fps ∼50% +7%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (2.6 - 8.7, n=7)	5.46 fps ∼56% +19%
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 60, n=224)	9.83 fps ∼100% +114%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2.9 fps ∼43%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	1.8 fps ∼26% -38%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2.9 fps ∼43% 0%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	3 fps ∼44% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (2.8 - 3.7, n=7)	3.01 fps ∼44% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 33, n=222)	6.81 fps ∼100% +135%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	7.7 fps ∼53%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	5 fps ∼34% -35%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	6.9 fps ∼47% -10%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	8.1 fps ∼55% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (6.9 - 15, n=7)	9.53 fps ∼65% +24%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 60, n=228)	14.6 fps ∼100% +90%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	8.5 fps ∼52%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	5 fps ∼31% -41%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.5 fps ∼52% 0%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	8.3 fps ∼51% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (6.1 - 8.6, n=7)	8.03 fps ∼50% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 87, n=228)	16.2 fps ∼100% +91%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	8.1 fps ∼65%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	5.5 fps ∼44% -32%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	7.6 fps ∼61% -6%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	8.2 fps ∼66% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (7.6 - 8.2, n=6)	7.87 fps ∼63% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 73, n=417)	12.4 fps ∼100% +53%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	7.4 fps ∼66%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	5.4 fps ∼48% -27%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	7.1 fps ∼63% -4%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	7.7 fps ∼69% +4%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (6.2 - 13, n=6)	8.12 fps ∼73% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=421)	11.2 fps ∼100% +51%

AnTuTu v8
UX (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	33632 Points ∼77%
Average Mediatek Helio P70	33632 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6969 - 82947, n=41)	43533 Points ∼100% +29%
MEM (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	37952 Points ∼79%
Average Mediatek Helio P70	37952 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (24176 - 100390, n=41)	48115 Points ∼100% +27%
GPU (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	37197 Points ∼46%
Average Mediatek Helio P70	37197 Points ∼46% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5938 - 209164, n=41)	81672 Points ∼100% +120%
CPU (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	74929 Points ∼84%
Average Mediatek Helio P70	74929 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (40620 - 168185, n=41)	89213 Points ∼100% +19%
Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	183710 Points ∼70%
Average Mediatek Helio P70	183710 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (84645 - 534558, n=41)	262580 Points ∼100% +43%

BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1045 Points ∼84%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	896 Points ∼72% -14%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1244 Points ∼100% +19%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	684 Points ∼55% -35%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1174 Points ∼94% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (1045 - 1244, n=6)	1134 Points ∼91% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1745, n=656)	770 Points ∼62% -26%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1712 Points ∼80%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	1499 Points ∼70% -12%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1716 Points ∼80% 0%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	740 Points ∼35% -57%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1721 Points ∼81% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (1712 - 1759, n=6)	1736 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 16996, n=656)	2134 Points ∼100% +25%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2559 Points ∼90%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	1228 Points ∼43% -52%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2598 Points ∼92% +2%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	706 Points ∼25% -72%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2839 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (1856 - 2839, n=6)	2387 Points ∼84% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 7500, n=656)	1584 Points ∼56% -38%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	3915 Points ∼97%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	3283 Points ∼81% -16%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	3722 Points ∼92% -5%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	1746 Points ∼43% -55%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	3977 Points ∼98% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (3722 - 4682, n=6)	4044 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 14189, n=656)	3080 Points ∼76% -21%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2057 Points ∼94%
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	1526 Points ∼70% -26%
Ulefone Armor 6E Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2132 Points ∼98% +4%
RugGear RG850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	889 Points ∼41% -57%
Blackview BV9700 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2186 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (1959 - 2186, n=6)	2081 Points ∼95% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6097, n=656)	1545 Points ∼71% -25%

JetStream 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Blackview BV9700 Pro (Chrome 77)	50.055 Points ∼100% +5%
Blackview BV9800 Pro (Chrome 79)	47.513 Points ∼95%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (34.3 - 50.2, n=5)	44.8 Points ∼90% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=553)	42.8 Points ∼86% -10%
CAT S61 (Chrome 68)	28.136 Points ∼56% -41%
RugGear RG850 (Chrome 73)	18.351 Points ∼37% -61%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
RugGear RG850 (Chrome 73)	72 Points ∼100% +53%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=185)	67.1 Points ∼93% +43%
Ulefone Armor 6E (Chrome 76)	55 Points ∼76% +17%
Blackview BV9700 Pro (Chrome 77)	52 Points ∼72% +11%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (35 - 55, n=6)	47.3 Points ∼66% +1%
Blackview BV9800 Pro (Chrome 79)	47 Points ∼65%
CAT S61	38 Points ∼53% -19%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Blackview BV9700 Pro (Chrome 77)	9863 Points ∼100% +16%
Ulefone Armor 6E (Chrome 76)	9455 Points ∼96% +11%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (6269 - 9863, n=6)	8689 Points ∼88% +2%
Blackview BV9800 Pro (Chrome 79)	8520 Points ∼86%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=714)	6989 Points ∼71% -18%
CAT S61 (Chrome 68)	5146 Points ∼52% -40%
RugGear RG850 (Chrome 73)	3386 Points ∼34% -60%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
RugGear RG850 (Chrome 73)	13599.1 ms * ∼100% -181%
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=739)	10353 ms * ∼76% -114%
CAT S61 (Chrome 68)	9692 ms * ∼71% -100%
Blackview BV9800 Pro (Chrome 79)	4845.2 ms * ∼36%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (4198 - 5608, n=6)	4728 ms * ∼35% +2%
Blackview BV9700 Pro (Chrome 77)	4496.1 ms * ∼33% +7%
Ulefone Armor 6E (Chrome 76)	4302.1 ms * ∼32% +11%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

	Blackview BV9800 Pro	CAT S61	Ulefone Armor 6E	RugGear RG850	Blackview BV9700 Pro	Average 128 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-8%	-41%	-20%	-21%	10%	-17%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	61.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	63.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%	11.2 (Kingston 32GB) -82%	63.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%	1.7 (Hama 32) -97%	64.7 (52.8 - 73.5, n=15) 6%	49.9 (1.7 - 87.1, n=458) -18%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	77.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	83.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 8%	41.7 (Kingston 32GB) -46%	83.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 9%	45.1 (Hama 32GB) -42%	77.1 (71.6 - 85.9, n=15) 0%	68.2 (8.1 - 96.5, n=458) -12%
Random Write 4KB	20.74	15.1 -27%	15.8 -24%	12.64 -39%	21.86 5%	37.8 (8.48 - 127, n=17) 82%	24.6 (0.14 - 259, n=789) 19%
Random Read 4KB	86.68	44.7 -48%	43.4 -50%	39 -55%	89.48 3%	70.5 (20.7 - 108, n=17) -19%	49.9 (1.59 - 226, n=789) -42%
Sequential Write 256KB	185.88	212.2 14%	103.3 -44%	120.74 -35%	190.2 2%	172 (90 - 201, n=17) -7%	102 (2.99 - 590, n=789) -45%
Sequential Read 256KB	286.45	284.7 -1%	287.5 0%	280.06 -2%	293.81 3%	286 (144 - 499, n=17) 0%	285 (12.1 - 1781, n=789) -1%

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge


32.1 °C	32.2 °C	36.2 °C
32 °C	31.9 °C	35.9 °C
30.4 °C	32.3 °C	34.1 °C

Maximum: 36.2 °C
Moyenne: 33 °C


29.4 °C	29.4 °C	29.2 °C
28.2 °C	29.5 °C	29.6 °C
29 °C	29.6 °C	30.4 °C

Maximum: 30.4 °C
Moyenne: 29.4 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 26.3 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Blackview BV9800 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

CAT S61 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique

Éteint/en veille	0.02 / 0.28 Watts
Au repos	0.87 / 1.91 / 2.03 Watts
Fortement sollicité	4.4 / 7.49 Watts


Légende: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Blackview BV9800 Pro 6580 mAh	CAT S61 4500 mAh	Ulefone Armor 6E 5000 mAh	RugGear RG850 4000 mAh	Blackview BV9700 Pro 4380 mAh	Average Mediatek Helio P70	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-9%	6%	-4%	-6%	5%	7%
Idle Minimum *	0.87	1.4 -61%	0.8 8%	1.2 -38%	1.2 -38%	0.87 (0.61 - 1.2, n=4) -0%	0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=807) -1%
Idle Average *	1.91	1.9 1%	1.6 16%	1.7 11%	1.5 21%	1.678 (1.5 - 1.91, n=4) 12%	1.742 (0.6 - 6.2, n=806) 9%
Idle Maximum *	2.03	2.6 -28%	2.5 -23%	2.6 -28%	2.8 -38%	2.27 (1.73 - 2.8, n=4) -12%	2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=807) -0%
Load Average *	4.4	3.5 20%	3.8 14%	3.8 14%	3.5 20%	3.74 (3.24 - 4.4, n=4) 15%	4.08 (0.8 - 10.8, n=801) 7%
Load Maximum *	7.49	5.6 25%	6.5 13%	6 20%	7 7%	6.66 (5.63 - 7.49, n=4) 11%	5.95 (1.2 - 14.2, n=801) 21%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie


NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		24h 52min

	Blackview BV9800 Pro 6580 mAh	CAT S61 4500 mAh	Ulefone Armor 6E 5000 mAh	RugGear RG850 4000 mAh	Blackview BV9700 Pro 4380 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3	1492	923 -38%	942 -37%	857 -43%	1033 -31%

Points positifs

+ robustesse

+ Wifi

+ fluidité

+ certifié IP68, IP69K, MIL-STD-810G

+ appareil photo infrarouge

Points négatifs

- design

- appareil photo

Verdict

Les clients du Blackview BV9800 Pro ont exactement ce à quoi ils s’attendent : un robuste smartphone Android avec un appareil photo infrarouge. Toutes les fonctionnalités fonctionnent bien, et le BV9800 ne pèche dans aucun domaine. Le smartphone durci propose un bon niveau de performances, et s’avère réactif avec un usage normal. La batterie répond également à nos attentes.

Ceux qui ont besoin d’un appareil photo thermique et qui sont peu soucieux de l’allure de leur smartphone peuvent choisir le BV9800 sans hésitation.

Pour un prix d’environ 500 €, nous ne pouvons critiquer que la qualité en berne de l’appareil photo principal, et le design voyant. Le CAT S61, qui possède également un appareil photo infrarouge, est largement plus compact – mais coûte environ 300 € de plus, en fonction de l’offre.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Blackview BV9800 Pro - 2020-01-2001/20/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Châssis

87%

Clavier

65 / 75 → 87%

Dispositif de pointage

82%

Connectivité

50 / 70 → 71%

Poids

86%

Autonomie

95%

Écran

82%

Performances en jeu

14 / 64 → 21%

Performances dans les applications

61 / 86 → 71%

Chauffe

93%

Nuisance sonore

100%

Audio

77 / 90 → 86%

Appareil photo

52%

Moyenne

73%

77%

Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Linked Articles

Blackview BV9800 Pro (BV Gamme)

Critique

•

Test du Blackview BV9100 - Gra...

Critique

•

Test du Blackview BV9700 Pro :...

Critique

•

Courte critique du smartphone ...

Test du Blackview BV9800 Pro : smartphone durci avec appareil photo infrarouge

Comparaison des tailles

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Blackview BV9800 Pro audio analysis

CAT S61 audio analysis

Points positifs

Points négatifs

Verdict

Linked Articles

Pricecompare