Notebookcheck

Test du Blackview BV9800 Pro : smartphone durci avec appareil photo infrarouge

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger (traduit par Prévots), 02/04/2020

Robuste et autonome. Les smartphones de Blackview peuvent être assez fragiles. Mais quand on en vient à ses smartphones durcis, le fabriquant repousse les limites. Non seulement le châssis épais paraît costaud, mais il cache aussi des composants efficaces.

Blackview BV9800 Pro (BV Gamme)
Processeur
Mediatek Helio P70
Carte graphique
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Mémoire
6144 Mo 
Écran
6.3 pouces 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 409 PPP, capacitif, IPS, brillant: oui
Disque dur
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 Go 
, 116 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: USB C, jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD (FAT, FAT32, jusqu'à 256 Go), 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: capteur de proximité , capteur de mouvement, gyroscope, capteur magnétique, baromètre, capteur à effet Hall, e-boussole, IR, radio FM
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.1, 2G GMS (B2(1 900)/B3(1 800)/B5(850)/B8(900) ), 3G WCDMA/TDSCDMA (B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19 / B34 / B39), 4G LTE FDD/TDD/C2K (B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B7 / B8 / B12 / B13 / B17 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B25 / B26 / B28A/B28B/B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 14.8 x 168.5 x 81
Batterie
6580 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Charging
wireless charging
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 48 MPix 48 MP (Sony) + 5 MP (capteur thermique) + caméra thermique (FLIR), API Camera2 "limité"
Appareil photo secondaire: 16 MPix f/2,0
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: 2 haut-parleurs, Clavier: virtuel, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, chargeur USB, câble USB C, écouteurs stéréos, protection d'écran, outil pour carte SIM, 12 Mois Garantie, DAS (tête) : 0,461 W/kg, DAS (corps) : 0,959 W/kg, Widevine L3 DRM, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
Poids
322 g, Alimentation: 76 g
Prix
500 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

NoteDateModèlePoidsDriveTailleRésolutionBest Price
77%02/20Blackview BV9800 Pro
Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3
322 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
77%09/18CAT S61
630, Adreno 508
250 g64 GB eMMC Flash5.2"1920x1080
76%08/19Ulefone Armor 6E
Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3
268 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.2"2246x1080
79%05/19RugGear RG850
430, Adreno 505
209 g32 GB eMMC Flash5.99"1440x720
77%10/19Blackview BV9700 Pro
Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3
283 g128 GB NVMe5.84"2280x1080
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
CAT S61
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
339 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB eMMC Flash
315 (min: 204, max: 334) MBit/s ∼93%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1014, n=489)
235 MBit/s ∼69% -25%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB NVMe
64 (min: 46, max: 76) MBit/s ∼19% -80%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 64 GB eMMC Flash
58.7 (min: 57, max: 60) MBit/s ∼17% -81%
RugGear RG850
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
45.5 (min: 36, max: 51) MBit/s ∼13% -86%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
CAT S61
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
341 MBit/s ∼100% +13%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB eMMC Flash
302 (min: 173, max: 415) MBit/s ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 966, n=489)
221 MBit/s ∼65% -27%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB NVMe
55 (min: 50, max: 58) MBit/s ∼16% -82%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 64 GB eMMC Flash
52.3 (min: 48, max: 56) MBit/s ∼15% -83%
RugGear RG850
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
29.5 (min: 17, max: 46) MBit/s ∼9% -90%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø313 (204-334)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø302 (173-415)
GNSS - Blackview BV9800 Pro
GNSS - Blackview BV9800 Pro
GNSS - Blackview BV9800 Pro
GNSS - Blackview BV9800 Pro
GNSS - Blackview BV9800 Pro
GNSS - Blackview BV9800 Pro
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker Photo
29.3 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
52.4 ∆E
33.5 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
63.6 ∆E
63.4 ∆E
27.9 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
34.5 ∆E
74.8 ∆E
41 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
84.1 ∆E
69.6 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Blackview BV9800 Pro: 45.45 ∆E min: 13.76 - max: 84.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
7.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
10 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Blackview BV9800 Pro: 7.97 ∆E min: 2.45 - max: 13.85 ∆E
Blackview BV9800 Pro - Mire de test.
Mire de test.
Blackview BV9800 Pro - Mire de test zoomée.
Blackview BV9800 Pro - Mire de test (1 Lux).
519
cd/m²
528
cd/m²
498
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
511
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 531 cd/m² Moyenne: 508.4 cd/m² Minimum: 20.37 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 89 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 511 cd/m²
Contraste: 1762:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 10.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.08
Blackview BV9800 Pro
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
CAT S61
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Ulefone Armor 6E
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2
RugGear RG850
IPS, 1440x720, 5.99
Blackview BV9700 Pro
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
Screen
-5%
5%
-36%
8%
Brightness middle
511
693
36%
357
-30%
444
-13%
521
2%
Brightness
508
672
32%
352
-31%
469
-8%
525
3%
Brightness Distribution
89
90
1%
91
2%
88
-1%
87
-2%
Black Level *
0.29
0.77
-166%
0.24
17%
0.62
-114%
0.29
-0%
Contrast
1762
900
-49%
1488
-16%
716
-59%
1797
2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8.1
5.23
35%
6.08
25%
9.75
-20%
6.22
23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
15.2
10.18
33%
9.46
38%
22.4
-47%
9.5
37%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
10.9
6.9
37%
7
36%
13.5
-24%
11
-1%
Gamma
2.08 106%
2.834 78%
2.292 96%
2.736 80%
0.558 394%
CCT
9859 66%
7137 91%
7695 84%
9287 70%
8077 80%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 13646 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
32 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 10.8 ms hausse
↘ 21.2 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (24.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
64.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 30.8 ms hausse
↘ 34 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (39.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1191 Points ∼86%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (626 - 1191, n=3)
825 Points ∼59% -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (143 - 3794, n=43)
1387 Points ∼100% +16%
OpenCL Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1259 Points ∼72%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (1214 - 1259, n=2)
1237 Points ∼70% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=51)
1757 Points ∼100% +40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1399 Points ∼76%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (1155 - 1458, n=3)
1337 Points ∼72% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=63)
1848 Points ∼100% +32%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
295 Points ∼56%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (295 - 299, n=3)
297 Points ∼56% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=63)
526 Points ∼100% +78%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
8074 Points ∼99%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
4748 Points ∼58% -41%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8142 Points ∼100% +1%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
3596 Points ∼44% -55%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
8046 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (5992 - 8142, n=7)
7593 Points ∼93% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=425)
5426 Points ∼67% -33%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
11419 Points ∼97%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
5548 Points ∼47% -51%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
11141 Points ∼95% -2%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
4290 Points ∼36% -62%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
11781 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (7160 - 11781, n=7)
10421 Points ∼88% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=588)
5901 Points ∼50% -48%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2585 Points ∼98%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2355 Points ∼89% -9%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1835 Points ∼69% -29%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2587 Points ∼98% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (2350 - 2587, n=6)
2472 Points ∼94% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=96)
2641 Points ∼100% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1095 Points ∼42%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1030 Points ∼40% -6%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
306 Points ∼12% -72%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1098 Points ∼42% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (951 - 1107, n=6)
1051 Points ∼40% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=96)
2598 Points ∼100% +137%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1256 Points ∼53%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1177 Points ∼49% -6%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
376 Points ∼16% -70%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1259 Points ∼53% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (1096 - 1264, n=6)
1204 Points ∼50% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=96)
2391 Points ∼100% +90%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2883 Points ∼94%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1720 Points ∼56% -40%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2608 Points ∼85% -10%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1121 Points ∼37% -61%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3055 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (2309 - 3055, n=7)
2705 Points ∼89% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=432)
2014 Points ∼66% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1093 Points ∼60%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
787 Points ∼43% -28%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1081 Points ∼60% -1%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
305 Points ∼17% -72%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1096 Points ∼60% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (941 - 1096, n=7)
1053 Points ∼58% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=432)
1813 Points ∼100% +66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1268 Points ∼75%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
895 Points ∼53% -29%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1243 Points ∼74% -2%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
364 Points ∼22% -71%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1278 Points ∼76% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (1098 - 1278, n=7)
1217 Points ∼72% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=433)
1690 Points ∼100% +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3029 Points ∼97%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1766 Points ∼57% -42%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2585 Points ∼83% -15%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1148 Points ∼37% -62%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3116 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (2295 - 3116, n=7)
2741 Points ∼88% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5133, n=461)
1925 Points ∼62% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1606 Points ∼66%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1297 Points ∼54% -19%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1580 Points ∼65% -2%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
529 Points ∼22% -67%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1615 Points ∼67% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (1427 - 1615, n=7)
1563 Points ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=461)
2420 Points ∼100% +51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1793 Points ∼88%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1378 Points ∼67% -23%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1729 Points ∼85% -4%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
601 Points ∼29% -66%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1809 Points ∼89% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (1591 - 1809, n=7)
1726 Points ∼84% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=461)
2044 Points ∼100% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2869 Points ∼100%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1711 Points ∼60% -40%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2511 Points ∼88% -12%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1116 Points ∼39% -61%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2842 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (2272 - 2869, n=7)
2607 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4909, n=512)
1923 Points ∼67% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1104 Points ∼73%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
708 Points ∼47% -36%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1093 Points ∼72% -1%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
252 Points ∼17% -77%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1111 Points ∼74% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (884 - 1125, n=7)
1060 Points ∼70% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=512)
1510 Points ∼100% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1279 Points ∼88%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
814 Points ∼56% -36%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1250 Points ∼86% -2%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
304 Points ∼21% -76%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1285 Points ∼88% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (1029 - 1293, n=7)
1221 Points ∼84% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=513)
1457 Points ∼100% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2856 Points ∼99%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1729 Points ∼60% -39%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2459 Points ∼85% -14%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1128 Points ∼39% -61%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2895 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (2306 - 2895, n=7)
2608 Points ∼90% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4900, n=553)
1789 Points ∼62% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1278 Points ∼64%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1234 Points ∼62% -3%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1253 Points ∼63% -2%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
522 Points ∼26% -59%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1285 Points ∼65% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (1253 - 1608, n=7)
1389 Points ∼70% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=552)
1989 Points ∼100% +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1457 Points ∼85%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1318 Points ∼76% -10%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1406 Points ∼82% -4%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
593 Points ∼34% -59%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1466 Points ∼85% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (1406 - 1767, n=7)
1546 Points ∼90% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=555)
1724 Points ∼100% +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
17113 Points ∼91%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
12945 Points ∼69% -24%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9051 Points ∼48% -47%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
18798 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (15003 - 20711, n=6)
18798 Points ∼100% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=708)
14454 Points ∼77% -16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
20321 Points ∼89%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
18375 Points ∼81% -10%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9704 Points ∼43% -52%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
20307 Points ∼89% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (17412 - 20403, n=6)
19416 Points ∼85% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=706)
22753 Points ∼100% +12%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
19508 Points ∼98%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
16808 Points ∼84% -14%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9551 Points ∼48% -51%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
19951 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (18037 - 20433, n=6)
19208 Points ∼96% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=706)
18376 Points ∼92% -6%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
42 fps ∼98%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
29 fps ∼67% -31%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
34 fps ∼79% -19%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
43 fps ∼100% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (34 - 43, n=6)
37.8 fps ∼88% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=723)
39 fps ∼91% -7%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
38 fps ∼97%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
29 fps ∼74% -24%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
34 fps ∼87% -11%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
39 fps ∼100% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (29 - 46, n=6)
36.3 fps ∼93% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=732)
28.7 fps ∼74% -24%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
23 fps ∼100%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
14 fps ∼61% -39%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
18 fps ∼78% -22%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
23 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (18 - 23, n=6)
21.2 fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=627)
22.6 fps ∼98% -2%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
21 fps ∼96%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
13 fps ∼60% -38%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼78% -19%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
21 fps ∼96% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (17 - 35, n=6)
21.8 fps ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=636)
19.9 fps ∼91% -5%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
14 fps ∼77%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
9.7 fps ∼53% -31%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
12 fps ∼66% -14%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
14 fps ∼77% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (6.9 - 14, n=6)
12.2 fps ∼67% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=492)
18.3 fps ∼100% +31%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
12 fps ∼70%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
5.3 fps ∼31% -56%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
11 fps ∼64% -8%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
13 fps ∼76% +8%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (11 - 25, n=6)
14 fps ∼81% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=494)
17.2 fps ∼100% +43%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4.6 fps ∼47%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
3.1 fps ∼32% -33%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.7 fps ∼48% +2%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4.9 fps ∼50% +7%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (2.6 - 8.7, n=7)
5.46 fps ∼56% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=224)
9.83 fps ∼100% +114%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2.9 fps ∼43%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1.8 fps ∼26% -38%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2.9 fps ∼43% 0%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3 fps ∼44% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (2.8 - 3.7, n=7)
3.01 fps ∼44% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=222)
6.81 fps ∼100% +135%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.7 fps ∼53%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
5 fps ∼34% -35%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6.9 fps ∼47% -10%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
8.1 fps ∼55% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (6.9 - 15, n=7)
9.53 fps ∼65% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=228)
14.6 fps ∼100% +90%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
8.5 fps ∼52%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
5 fps ∼31% -41%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.5 fps ∼52% 0%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
8.3 fps ∼51% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (6.1 - 8.6, n=7)
8.03 fps ∼50% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=228)
16.2 fps ∼100% +91%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
8.1 fps ∼65%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
5.5 fps ∼44% -32%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7.6 fps ∼61% -6%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
8.2 fps ∼66% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (7.6 - 8.2, n=6)
7.87 fps ∼63% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=417)
12.4 fps ∼100% +53%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.4 fps ∼66%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
5.4 fps ∼48% -27%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7.1 fps ∼63% -4%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.7 fps ∼69% +4%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (6.2 - 13, n=6)
8.12 fps ∼73% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=421)
11.2 fps ∼100% +51%
AnTuTu v8
UX (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
33632 Points ∼77%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
 
33632 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6969 - 82947, n=41)
43533 Points ∼100% +29%
MEM (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
37952 Points ∼79%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
 
37952 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (24176 - 100390, n=41)
48115 Points ∼100% +27%
GPU (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
37197 Points ∼46%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
 
37197 Points ∼46% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5938 - 209164, n=41)
81672 Points ∼100% +120%
CPU (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
74929 Points ∼84%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
 
74929 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40620 - 168185, n=41)
89213 Points ∼100% +19%
Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
183710 Points ∼70%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
 
183710 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (84645 - 534558, n=41)
262580 Points ∼100% +43%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1045 Points ∼84%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
896 Points ∼72% -14%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1244 Points ∼100% +19%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
684 Points ∼55% -35%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1174 Points ∼94% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (1045 - 1244, n=6)
1134 Points ∼91% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=656)
770 Points ∼62% -26%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1712 Points ∼80%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1499 Points ∼70% -12%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1716 Points ∼80% 0%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
740 Points ∼35% -57%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1721 Points ∼81% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (1712 - 1759, n=6)
1736 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=656)
2134 Points ∼100% +25%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2559 Points ∼90%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1228 Points ∼43% -52%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2598 Points ∼92% +2%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
706 Points ∼25% -72%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2839 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (1856 - 2839, n=6)
2387 Points ∼84% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=656)
1584 Points ∼56% -38%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3915 Points ∼97%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
3283 Points ∼81% -16%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3722 Points ∼92% -5%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1746 Points ∼43% -55%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3977 Points ∼98% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (3722 - 4682, n=6)
4044 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=656)
3080 Points ∼76% -21%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2057 Points ∼94%
CAT S61
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1526 Points ∼70% -26%
Ulefone Armor 6E
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2132 Points ∼98% +4%
RugGear RG850
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
889 Points ∼41% -57%
Blackview BV9700 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2186 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio P70
  (1959 - 2186, n=6)
2081 Points ∼95% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=656)
1545 Points ∼71% -25%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Blackview BV9700 Pro (Chrome 77)
50.055 Points ∼100% +5%
Blackview BV9800 Pro (Chrome 79)
47.513 Points ∼95%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (34.3 - 50.2, n=5)
44.8 Points ∼90% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=553)
42.8 Points ∼86% -10%
CAT S61 (Chrome 68)
28.136 Points ∼56% -41%
RugGear RG850 (Chrome 73)
18.351 Points ∼37% -61%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
RugGear RG850 (Chrome 73)
72 Points ∼100% +53%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=185)
67.1 Points ∼93% +43%
Ulefone Armor 6E (Chrome 76)
55 Points ∼76% +17%
Blackview BV9700 Pro (Chrome 77)
52 Points ∼72% +11%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (35 - 55, n=6)
47.3 Points ∼66% +1%
Blackview BV9800 Pro (Chrome 79)
47 Points ∼65%
CAT S61
38 Points ∼53% -19%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Blackview BV9700 Pro (Chrome 77)
9863 Points ∼100% +16%
Ulefone Armor 6E (Chrome 76)
9455 Points ∼96% +11%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (6269 - 9863, n=6)
8689 Points ∼88% +2%
Blackview BV9800 Pro (Chrome 79)
8520 Points ∼86%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=714)
6989 Points ∼71% -18%
CAT S61 (Chrome 68)
5146 Points ∼52% -40%
RugGear RG850 (Chrome 73)
3386 Points ∼34% -60%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
RugGear RG850 (Chrome 73)
13599.1 ms * ∼100% -181%
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=739)
10353 ms * ∼76% -114%
CAT S61 (Chrome 68)
9692 ms * ∼71% -100%
Blackview BV9800 Pro (Chrome 79)
4845.2 ms * ∼36%
Average Mediatek Helio P70 (4198 - 5608, n=6)
4728 ms * ∼35% +2%
Blackview BV9700 Pro (Chrome 77)
4496.1 ms * ∼33% +7%
Ulefone Armor 6E (Chrome 76)
4302.1 ms * ∼32% +11%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Blackview BV9800 ProCAT S61Ulefone Armor 6ERugGear RG850Blackview BV9700 ProAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-8%
-41%
-20%
-21%
10%
-17%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
63.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
11.2 (Kingston 32GB)
-82%
63.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
1.7 (Hama 32)
-97%
64.7 (52.8 - 73.5, n=15)
6%
49.9 (1.7 - 87.1, n=458)
-18%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
77.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
83.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
41.7 (Kingston 32GB)
-46%
83.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
45.1 (Hama 32GB)
-42%
77.1 (71.6 - 85.9, n=15)
0%
68.2 (8.1 - 96.5, n=458)
-12%
Random Write 4KB
20.74
15.1
-27%
15.8
-24%
12.64
-39%
21.86
5%
37.8 (8.48 - 127, n=17)
82%
24.6 (0.14 - 259, n=789)
19%
Random Read 4KB
86.68
44.7
-48%
43.4
-50%
39
-55%
89.48
3%
70.5 (20.7 - 108, n=17)
-19%
49.9 (1.59 - 226, n=789)
-42%
Sequential Write 256KB
185.88
212.2
14%
103.3
-44%
120.74
-35%
190.2
2%
172 (90 - 201, n=17)
-7%
102 (2.99 - 590, n=789)
-45%
Sequential Read 256KB
286.45
284.7
-1%
287.5
0%
280.06
-2%
293.81
3%
286 (144 - 499, n=17)
0%
285 (12.1 - 1781, n=789)
-1%
 32.1 °C32.2 °C36.2 °C 
 32 °C31.9 °C35.9 °C 
 30.4 °C32.3 °C34.1 °C 
Maximum: 36.2 °C
Moyenne: 33 °C
29.4 °C29.4 °C29.2 °C
28.2 °C29.5 °C29.6 °C
29 °C29.6 °C30.4 °C
Maximum: 30.4 °C
Moyenne: 29.4 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  26.3 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.440.5253035.53126.728.24027.726.85037.636.46328.827.3802421.310021.223.412521.528.416021.14520016.252.325018.760.531516644001665.650014.566.263014.667.480014.470.7100015.673.8125015.371.4160014.671.8200014.672.6250014.574.2315014.776.5400014.674.3500014.573.5630014.572.1800014.7661000015.171.41250015.166.51600015.155.2SPL27.184.7N0.962.8median 15.1median 67.4Delta1.48.132.342.325.635.425.732.927.428.23738.423.327.221.424.821.728.819.934.517.440.5174716.450.114.552.714.259.114.161.812.664.212.568.61267.411.864.911.66811.470.611.369.211.47111.16711.265.611.363.111.265.811.363.111.350.611.346.567.365.824.179.421.617.80.644.8median 11.8median 63.11.79hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseBlackview BV9800 ProCAT S61
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Blackview BV9800 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

CAT S61 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.02 / 0.28 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.87 / 1.91 / 2.03 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 4.4 / 7.49 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Blackview BV9800 Pro
6580 mAh
CAT S61
4500 mAh
Ulefone Armor 6E
5000 mAh
RugGear RG850
4000 mAh
Blackview BV9700 Pro
4380 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P70
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-9%
6%
-4%
-6%
5%
7%
Idle Minimum *
0.87
1.4
-61%
0.8
8%
1.2
-38%
1.2
-38%
0.87 (0.61 - 1.2, n=4)
-0%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=807)
-1%
Idle Average *
1.91
1.9
1%
1.6
16%
1.7
11%
1.5
21%
1.678 (1.5 - 1.91, n=4)
12%
1.742 (0.6 - 6.2, n=806)
9%
Idle Maximum *
2.03
2.6
-28%
2.5
-23%
2.6
-28%
2.8
-38%
2.27 (1.73 - 2.8, n=4)
-12%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=807)
-0%
Load Average *
4.4
3.5
20%
3.8
14%
3.8
14%
3.5
20%
3.74 (3.24 - 4.4, n=4)
15%
4.08 (0.8 - 10.8, n=801)
7%
Load Maximum *
7.49
5.6
25%
6.5
13%
6
20%
7
7%
6.66 (5.63 - 7.49, n=4)
11%
5.95 (1.2 - 14.2, n=801)
21%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
24h 52min
Blackview BV9800 Pro
6580 mAh
CAT S61
4500 mAh
Ulefone Armor 6E
5000 mAh
RugGear RG850
4000 mAh
Blackview BV9700 Pro
4380 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3
1492
923
-38%
942
-37%
857
-43%
1033
-31%

Points positifs

+ robustesse
+ Wifi
+ fluidité
+ certifié IP68, IP69K, MIL-STD-810G
+ appareil photo infrarouge

Points négatifs

- design
- appareil photo

Verdict

En test : le Blackview BV9800 Pro.
En test : le Blackview BV9800 Pro.

Les clients du Blackview BV9800 Pro ont exactement ce à quoi ils s’attendent : un robuste smartphone Android avec un appareil photo infrarouge. Toutes les fonctionnalités fonctionnent bien, et le BV9800 ne pèche dans aucun domaine. Le smartphone durci propose un bon niveau de performances, et s’avère réactif avec un usage normal. La batterie répond également à nos attentes.

Ceux qui ont besoin d’un appareil photo thermique et qui sont peu soucieux de l’allure de leur smartphone peuvent choisir le BV9800 sans hésitation.

Pour un prix d’environ 500 €, nous ne pouvons critiquer que la qualité en berne de l’appareil photo principal, et le design voyant. Le CAT S61, qui possède également un appareil photo infrarouge, est largement plus compact – mais coûte environ 300 € de plus, en fonction de l’offre.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Blackview BV9800 Pro - 01/20/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Châssis
87%
Clavier
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositif de pointage
82%
Connectivité
50 / 70 → 71%
Poids
86%
Autonomie
95%
Écran
82%
Performances en jeu
14 / 64 → 21%
Performances dans les applications
61 / 86 → 71%
Chauffe
93%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Appareil photo
52%
Moyenne
73%
77%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Blackview BV9800 Pro : smartphone durci avec appareil photo infrarouge
Mike Wobker, 2020-02- 4 (Update: 2020-02- 4)