Notebookcheck

Test du Google Pixel 5 : milieu de gamme puissant avec Android 11

Reculer pour mieux sauter. Le Pixel 5 est le nouveau smartphone fleuron de Google, et s'avère extrêmement compact, puisqu'il ne fait que 6 pouces. Le smartphone Android 11 n'est en outre pas équipé d'un SoC haut de gamme, mais seulement d'un processeur du milieu de gamme. Mais comme nos tests le montrent, l'ensemble est efficace.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduit par Prévots), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
, , , , , ,
relation de la recherche.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Google Pixel 5
Processeur
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Carte graphique
Mémoire
8192 Mo 
, LPDDR4x
Écran
6.00 pouces 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 432 PPP, capacitif, OLED, FHD+, 16 millions de couleurs, écran always-on, Gorilla Glass 6, brillant: oui, HDR, 90 Hz
Disque dur
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 Go 
, 111.4 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Connectique audio: USB C, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: capteur de proximité, capteur de luminosité ambiante, accéléromètre, gyroscope, magnétomètre, baromètre, capteur spectral et flicker, 2x2 MIMO, aptX, aptX HD, Google Cast, eSIM, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API full
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1 800, 1 900 MHz) 3G (bandes 1 / 2 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 8 / 19), LTE (B1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 7 / 8 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 25 / 26 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 32 / 38 / 39 / 40 / 41 / 42 / 46 / 48 / 66 / 71), 5G (Sub-6 bandes n1 / 2 / 3 / 5 / 7 / 8, LTE, 5G, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8 x 144.7 x 70.4
Batterie
4080 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Android 11
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 16 MPix ultra grand-angle 16 MP (pixels de 1,0 μm, ƒ/2,2, champ de vue 107°) + 12,2 MP dual pixel (pixels de 1,4 μm, autofocus à détection de phase dual pixel, stabilisation d'image optique + électronique, ƒ/1,7, champ de vue 77°), vidéos jusqu'en 4K à
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix 8 MP (pixels de 1,12 μm, ƒ/2,0, champ de vue 83°), vidéos jusqu'en 1080p à 30 FPS
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Clavier: virtuel, adaptateur 18 W avec USB PD 2.0, câble USB C, adaptateur USB C vers USB A, outil pour carte SIM, guide de démarrage rapide, 3 ans au minimum avec l'OS et les packs de sécurité, 24 Mois Garantie, fanless, waterproof
Poids
151 g, Alimentation: 50 g
Prix
630 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Appareils du comparatif

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Drive
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
84 %
11/20
Google Pixel 5
SD 765G, Adreno 620
151 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.00"2340x1080
87 %
12/19
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
194 g64 GB SSD6.10"1792x828
86 %
11/19
Google Pixel 4
SD 855, Adreno 640
162 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash5.70"2280x1080
86 %
05/20
Google Pixel 4 XL
SD 855, Adreno 640
193 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.30"3040x1440
83 %
09/20
OnePlus Nord
SD 765G, Adreno 620
184 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.44"2440x1080
84 %
08/20
Vivo X50 Pro
SD 765G, Adreno 620
181.5 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.56"2376x1080
84 %
09/20
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080
84 %
05/20
ZTE Axon 11 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
168 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.47"2340x1080

Comparaison des tailles

163.7 mm 74.8 mm 7.9 mm 192 g160.4 mm 75.1 mm 8.2 mm 193 g159.2 mm 73.4 mm 7.9 mm 168 g158.3 mm 73.3 mm 8.2 mm 184 g158.46 mm 72.8 mm 8.04 mm 181.5 g150.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.3 mm 194 g147.1 mm 68.8 mm 8.2 mm 162 g144.7 mm 70.4 mm 8 mm 151 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 (618min - 677max) MBit/s ∼100% +38%
Vivo X50 Pro
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
642 (627min - 656max) MBit/s ∼96% +33%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
591 (564min - 609max) MBit/s ∼88% +22%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
563 (275min - 666max) MBit/s ∼84% +17%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
529 (204min - 603max) MBit/s ∼79% +10%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
483 (479min - 493max) MBit/s ∼72%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
475 (437min - 523max) MBit/s ∼71% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=298, last 2 years)
395 MBit/s ∼59% -18%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
317 (159min - 363max) MBit/s ∼47% -34%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Vivo X50 Pro
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
676 (631min - 695max) MBit/s ∼100% +8%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
661 (632min - 679max) MBit/s ∼98% +6%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 (563min - 668max) MBit/s ∼96% +4%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
631 (579min - 653max) MBit/s ∼93% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (545min - 662max) MBit/s ∼93% 0%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
625 (521min - 652max) MBit/s ∼92%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
563 (490min - 597max) MBit/s ∼83% -10%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
526 (413min - 655max) MBit/s ∼78% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=298, last 2 years)
403 MBit/s ∼60% -36%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630599629611627608601604623521635641610622627605631602626641645643641646638649643652640642637599629611627608601604623521635641610622627605631602626641645643641646638649643652640642637479485479482483482486480482483479483479480483485486484484483480483485483485481493488485482Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø625 (521-652)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø483 (479-493)
Localisation Google Pixel 5 : vue générale.
Localisation Google Pixel 5 : vue générale.
Localisation Google Pixel 5 : lac.
Localisation Google Pixel 5 : lac.
Localisation Google Pixel 5 : boucle.
Localisation Google Pixel 5 : boucle.
Localisation Garmin Edge 500 : vue générale.
Localisation Garmin Edge 500 : vue générale.
Localisation Garmin Edge 500 : lac.
Localisation Garmin Edge 500 : lac.
Localisation Garmin Edge 500 : boucle.
Localisation Garmin Edge 500 : boucle.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Tageslicht-Szene 1Tageslicht-Szene 2Weitwinkel5-facher ZoomLowlight-Umgebung
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker
13.7 ∆E
5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
12 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 5: 6.88 ∆E min: 1.54 - max: 17.79 ∆E
ColorChecker
27.6 ∆E
50.2 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
62.3 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
34.9 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
59.9 ∆E
62 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
49.5 ∆E
30 ∆E
69.2 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
46.9 ∆E
76.5 ∆E
67.5 ∆E
51 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 5: 43.92 ∆E min: 13.98 - max: 76.49 ∆E
629
cd/m²
632
cd/m²
643
cd/m²
632
cd/m²
635
cd/m²
647
cd/m²
636
cd/m²
635
cd/m²
634
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 647 cd/m² Moyenne: 635.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.27 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 97 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 635 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
97.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Google Pixel 5
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.00
Apple iPhone 11
IPS, 1792x828, 6.10
Google Pixel 4
OLED, 2280x1080, 5.70
Google Pixel 4 XL
P-OLED, 3040x1440, 6.30
OnePlus Nord
AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.44
Vivo X50 Pro
AMOLED, 2376x1080, 6.56
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.57
ZTE Axon 11 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen
6%
5%
-116%
-60%
-93%
-16%
-99%
Brightness middle
635
679
7%
554
-13%
557
-12%
529
-17%
784
23%
584
-8%
603
-5%
Brightness
636
671
6%
550
-14%
555
-13%
531
-17%
780
23%
583
-8%
608
-4%
Brightness Distribution
97
93
-4%
94
-3%
95
-2%
94
-3%
97
0%
97
0%
92
-5%
Black Level *
0.68
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
0.8
0.8
-0%
0.8
-0%
3.9
-388%
2.53
-216%
3.5
-338%
1.17
-46%
3
-275%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.2
2.4
-9%
1.4
36%
6.1
-177%
4.52
-105%
6.4
-191%
2.95
-34%
6.2
-182%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.7
1.1
35%
1.3
24%
3.5
-106%
1.7
-0%
3
-76%
1.7
-0%
3.8
-124%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.24 98%
2.22 99%
2.18 101%
2.249 98%
1.99 111%
2.231 99%
2.21 100%
CCT
6492 100%
6610 98%
6213 105%
6127 106%
6462 101%
6666 98%
6341 103%
7242 90%
Contrast
999

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 367.6 Hz ≤ 99 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 367.6 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 99 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 367.6 Hz est relativement élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevLa fréquence de rafraîchissement de 367.6 Hz est relativement élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.oir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue. Néanmoins certaines personnes pourront toujours percevoir un scintillement.

En comparaison, 52 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9695 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 151500) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
3.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 1.6 ms hausse
↘ 1.6 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
6.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 3.6 ms hausse
↘ 3.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
598 Points ∼80%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
746 Points ∼100% +25%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
552 Points ∼74% -8%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
611 Points ∼82% +2%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
634 Points ∼85% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
673 Points ∼90% +13%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
588 Points ∼79% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (554 - 673, n=17)
603 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=216, last 2 years)
559 Points ∼75% -7%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1635 Points ∼64%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2573 Points ∼100% +57%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2164 Points ∼84% +32%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1966 Points ∼76% +20%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1876 Points ∼73% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1908 Points ∼74% +17%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1816 Points ∼71% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1520 - 1966, n=17)
1781 Points ∼69% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=216, last 2 years)
1925 Points ∼75% +18%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
10007 Points ∼78%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
12190 Points ∼96% +22%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
12760 Points ∼100% +28%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
10876 Points ∼85% +9%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9675 Points ∼76% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8730 Points ∼68% -13%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
9168 Points ∼72% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8687 - 11041, n=16)
9734 Points ∼76% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=238, last 2 years)
9845 Points ∼77% -2%
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8954 Points ∼87%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10254 Points ∼99% +15%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10335 Points ∼100% +15%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9427 Points ∼91% +5%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8065 Points ∼78% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7786 Points ∼75% -13%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7737 Points ∼75% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (7245 - 9989, n=17)
8308 Points ∼80% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=272, last 2 years)
7766 Points ∼75% -13%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
48201 Points ∼50%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
97276 Points ∼100% +102%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
73984 Points ∼76% +53%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
80296 Points ∼83% +67%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
45872 Points ∼47% -5%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
44918 Points ∼46% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
45304 Points ∼47% -6%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38137 Points ∼39% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (38137 - 48201, n=17)
44398 Points ∼46% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=223, last 2 years)
38963 Points ∼40% -19%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
60281 Points ∼29%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
209204 Points ∼100% +247%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
102168 Points ∼49% +69%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
105430 Points ∼50% +75%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69285 Points ∼33% +15%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
68808 Points ∼33% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
69506 Points ∼33% +15%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
68840 Points ∼33% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (56690 - 70216, n=17)
67538 Points ∼32% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=223, last 2 years)
56004 Points ∼27% -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
28331 Points ∼65%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33864 Points ∼77% +20%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37641 Points ∼86% +33%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
43773 Points ∼100% +55%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21016 Points ∼48% -26%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
20631 Points ∼47% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
20429 Points ∼47% -28%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
14891 Points ∼34% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (14891 - 28331, n=17)
20632 Points ∼47% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 59268, n=223, last 2 years)
22813 Points ∼52% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2972 Points ∼40%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7263 Points ∼97% +144%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7507 Points ∼100% +153%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4665 Points ∼62% +57%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4652 Points ∼62% +57%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4693 Points ∼63% +58%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4556 Points ∼61% +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2972 - 4693, n=17)
4318 Points ∼58% +45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=262, last 2 years)
3292 Points ∼44% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2844 Points ∼31%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8765 Points ∼96% +208%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9141 Points ∼100% +221%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5171 Points ∼57% +82%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5176 Points ∼57% +82%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5832 Points ∼64% +105%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5167 Points ∼57% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2844 - 5832, n=17)
4882 Points ∼53% +72%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=262, last 2 years)
3862 Points ∼42% +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3529 Points ∼76%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4540 Points ∼98% +29%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4618 Points ∼100% +31%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3476 Points ∼75% -2%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3432 Points ∼74% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3452 Points ∼75% -2%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3223 Points ∼70% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1689 - 3529, n=17)
3237 Points ∼70% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=262, last 2 years)
2708 Points ∼59% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3915 Points ∼43%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
9199 Points ∼100% +135%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7196 Points ∼78% +84%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7963 Points ∼87% +103%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4815 Points ∼52% +23%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4819 Points ∼52% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4893 Points ∼53% +25%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4712 Points ∼51% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3678 - 4893, n=17)
4562 Points ∼50% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=274, last 2 years)
3773 Points ∼41% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4036 Points ∼23%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
17853 Points ∼100% +342%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9217 Points ∼52% +128%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9995 Points ∼56% +148%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5357 Points ∼30% +33%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5265 Points ∼29% +30%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5335 Points ∼30% +32%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5416 Points ∼30% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4036 - 5437, n=17)
5181 Points ∼29% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=274, last 2 years)
4748 Points ∼27% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3544 Points ∼76%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3411 Points ∼73% -4%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4072 Points ∼88% +15%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4652 Points ∼100% +31%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3555 Points ∼76% 0%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3651 Points ∼78% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3492 Points ∼75% -1%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3238 Points ∼70% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1790 - 3651, n=17)
3275 Points ∼70% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=272, last 2 years)
2826 Points ∼61% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2315 Points ∼40%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4400 Points ∼77% +90%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5615 Points ∼98% +143%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5734 Points ∼100% +148%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3330 Points ∼58% +44%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3329 Points ∼58% +44%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3346 Points ∼58% +45%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3263 Points ∼57% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2261 - 3346, n=17)
3162 Points ∼55% +37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=261, last 2 years)
2591 Points ∼45% +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2106 Points ∼34%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5726 Points ∼92% +172%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6214 Points ∼100% +195%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6163 Points ∼99% +193%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3284 Points ∼53% +56%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3342 Points ∼54% +59%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3321 Points ∼53% +58%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3302 Points ∼53% +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2048 - 3342, n=17)
3137 Points ∼50% +49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=261, last 2 years)
2759 Points ∼44% +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3547 Points ∼77%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2429 Points ∼53% -32%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4199 Points ∼91% +18%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4612 Points ∼100% +30%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3503 Points ∼76% -1%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3462 Points ∼75% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3425 Points ∼74% -3%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3133 Points ∼68% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2964 - 3556, n=17)
3331 Points ∼72% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=261, last 2 years)
2752 Points ∼60% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2964 Points ∼46%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6067 Points ∼95% +105%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5685 Points ∼89% +92%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6404 Points ∼100% +116%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3553 Points ∼55% +20%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3597 Points ∼56% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3605 Points ∼56% +22%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3494 Points ∼55% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2934 - 3605, n=17)
3413 Points ∼53% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=273, last 2 years)
3075 Points ∼48% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2834 Points ∼35%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8119 Points ∼100% +186%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6383 Points ∼79% +125%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6950 Points ∼86% +145%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3556 Points ∼44% +25%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3556 Points ∼44% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3589 Points ∼44% +27%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3579 Points ∼44% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2814 - 3592, n=17)
3467 Points ∼43% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=273, last 2 years)
3420 Points ∼42% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3530 Points ∼70%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3219 Points ∼64% -9%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4112 Points ∼82% +16%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5024 Points ∼100% +42%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3544 Points ∼71% 0%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3765 Points ∼75% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3495 Points ∼70% -1%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3225 Points ∼64% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1898 - 3765, n=17)
3288 Points ∼65% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=273, last 2 years)
2883 Points ∼57% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2478 Points ∼50%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4509 Points ∼91% +82%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4970 Points ∼100% +101%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3108 Points ∼63% +25%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3087 Points ∼62% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3130 Points ∼63% +26%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3041 Points ∼61% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2287 - 3130, n=17)
2966 Points ∼60% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (262 - 6977, n=213, last 2 years)
2627 Points ∼53% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2364 Points ∼42%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5228 Points ∼92% +121%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5685 Points ∼100% +140%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3185 Points ∼56% +35%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3149 Points ∼55% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3198 Points ∼56% +35%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3192 Points ∼56% +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 3198, n=17)
3053 Points ∼54% +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (210 - 11259, n=213, last 2 years)
2963 Points ∼52% +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2979 Points ∼86%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3044 Points ∼88% +2%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3452 Points ∼100% +16%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2867 Points ∼83% -4%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2893 Points ∼84% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2893 Points ∼84% -3%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2609 Points ∼76% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 2979, n=17)
2742 Points ∼79% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=213, last 2 years)
2642 Points ∼77% -11%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
45 fps ∼51%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼68% +33%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
88 fps ∼100% +96%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼68% +33%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
60 fps ∼68% +33%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
81 fps ∼92% +80%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
60 fps ∼68% +33%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
59 fps ∼67% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (43 - 86, n=15)
62.5 fps ∼71% +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=221, last 2 years)
55.4 fps ∼63% +23%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
48 fps ∼15%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
322 fps ∼100% +571%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
139 fps ∼43% +190%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
136 fps ∼42% +183%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
97 fps ∼30% +102%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
93 fps ∼29% +94%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
95 fps ∼30% +98%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
93 fps ∼29% +94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (48 - 97, n=15)
88.7 fps ∼28% +85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=221, last 2 years)
102 fps ∼32% +113%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
30 fps ∼45%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼90% +100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
67 fps ∼100% +123%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
46 fps ∼69% +53%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼75% +67%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
46 fps ∼69% +53%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
55 fps ∼82% +83%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
48 fps ∼72% +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (30 - 55, n=15)
46.5 fps ∼69% +55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=219, last 2 years)
43.6 fps ∼65% +45%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
31 fps ∼18%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
175 fps ∼100% +465%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
75 fps ∼43% +142%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
82 fps ∼47% +165%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
55 fps ∼31% +77%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
50 fps ∼29% +61%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
49 fps ∼28% +58%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
56 fps ∼32% +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (31 - 56, n=15)
51.1 fps ∼29% +65%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=220, last 2 years)
59.6 fps ∼34% +92%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼35%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +186%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps ∼85% +143%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
27 fps ∼45% +29%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼57% +62%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
31 fps ∼52% +48%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
33 fps ∼55% +57%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
32 fps ∼53% +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (21 - 37, n=15)
31.5 fps ∼53% +50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=217, last 2 years)
34.1 fps ∼57% +62%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
22 fps ∼19%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
117 fps ∼100% +432%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
57 fps ∼49% +159%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
53 fps ∼45% +141%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼32% +73%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
35 fps ∼30% +59%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38 fps ∼32% +73%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38 fps ∼32% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (22 - 38, n=15)
35.3 fps ∼30% +60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=217, last 2 years)
40.8 fps ∼35% +85%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼22%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +362%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
30 fps ∼50% +131%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼27% +23%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼32% +46%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
18 fps ∼30% +38%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼30% +38%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼30% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (11 - 21, n=15)
17.7 fps ∼30% +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=216, last 2 years)
21.4 fps ∼36% +65%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
12 fps ∼16%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
73 fps ∼100% +508%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
34 fps ∼47% +183%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32 fps ∼44% +167%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼29% +75%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
20 fps ∼27% +67%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼29% +75%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼29% +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (12 - 21, n=15)
19.7 fps ∼27% +64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=216, last 2 years)
24.5 fps ∼34% +104%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼22%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +362%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33 fps ∼55% +154%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
17 fps ∼28% +31%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼35% +62%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼35% +62%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼35% +62%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼35% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (13 - 23, n=17)
20.2 fps ∼34% +55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=277, last 2 years)
21.4 fps ∼36% +65%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼15%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
87 fps ∼100% +569%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32 fps ∼37% +146%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33 fps ∼38% +154%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼28% +85%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23 fps ∼26% +77%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
24 fps ∼28% +85%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
24 fps ∼28% +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (12 - 24, n=17)
21.6 fps ∼25% +66%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=277, last 2 years)
24.6 fps ∼28% +89%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.8 fps ∼15%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +582%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼40% +173%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11 fps ∼18% +25%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼22% +48%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼22% +48%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼22% +48%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼22% +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.8 - 15, n=17)
12.3 fps ∼21% +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=278, last 2 years)
14.2 fps ∼24% +61%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5.3 fps ∼16%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +523%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
13 fps ∼39% +145%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
12 fps ∼36% +126%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼26% +60%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.3 fps ∼25% +57%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.5 fps ∼26% +60%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.6 fps ∼26% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5.3 - 13, n=17)
8.38 fps ∼25% +58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=277, last 2 years)
9.75 fps ∼30% +84%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
288970 Points ∼68%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
376698 Points ∼88% +30%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
426757 Points ∼100% +48%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
332074 Points ∼78% +15%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
327208 Points ∼77% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
318669 Points ∼75% +10%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
316938 Points ∼74% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (285731 - 332305, n=14)
312767 Points ∼73% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=178, last 2 years)
331741 Points ∼78% +15%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3290 Points ∼62%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5277 Points ∼100% +60%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5243 Points ∼99% +59%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4054 Points ∼77% +23%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3857 Points ∼73% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4094 Points ∼78% +24%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4020 Points ∼76% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3237 - 4094, n=14)
3813 Points ∼72% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=205, last 2 years)
3513 Points ∼67% +7%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5960 Points ∼71%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8058 Points ∼96% +35%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8417 Points ∼100% +41%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6801 Points ∼81% +14%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6936 Points ∼82% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6069 Points ∼72% +2%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6691 Points ∼79% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5411 - 6936, n=14)
6506 Points ∼77% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=205, last 2 years)
6448 Points ∼77% +8%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5381 Points ∼83%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6458 Points ∼100% +20%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6387 Points ∼99% +19%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5296 Points ∼82% -2%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4637 Points ∼72% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5683 Points ∼88% +6%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5464 Points ∼85% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4556 - 5683, n=14)
5099 Points ∼79% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=205, last 2 years)
4110 Points ∼64% -24%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2560 Points ∼27%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9307 Points ∼99% +264%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9356 Points ∼100% +265%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5203 Points ∼56% +103%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4639 Points ∼50% +81%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5201 Points ∼56% +103%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5247 Points ∼56% +105%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2525 - 5247, n=14)
4732 Points ∼51% +85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=205, last 2 years)
5414 Points ∼58% +111%
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1428 Points ∼89%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1601 Points ∼100% +12%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1502 Points ∼94% +5%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1441 Points ∼90% +1%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1442 Points ∼90% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1462 Points ∼91% +2%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1362 Points ∼85% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1139 - 1462, n=14)
1372 Points ∼86% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=205, last 2 years)
1244 Points ∼78% -13%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
132.886 Points ∼100% +162%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
58.665 Points ∼44% +15%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
56.678 Points ∼43% +12%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
50.811 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.232 Points ∼38% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=187, last 2 years)
49.4 Points ∼37% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 60.5, n=12)
47.7 Points ∼36% -6%
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83)
47.673 Points ∼36% -6%
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)
15.841 Points ∼12% -69%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
293.36 Points ∼100% +230%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
107.51 Points ∼37% +21%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
94.481 Points ∼32% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
93.643 Points ∼32% +5%
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83)
89.305 Points ∼30% 0%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
88.938 Points ∼30%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=194, last 2 years)
87.8 Points ∼30% -1%
Google Pixel 4 XL (Chrome 80)
84.388 Points ∼29% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (10.8 - 96.9, n=11)
81.1 Points ∼28% -9%
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)
10.765 Points ∼4% -88%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
157 runs/min ∼100% +219%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
61.8 runs/min ∼39% +26%
OnePlus Nord (Chome 84)
53.6 runs/min ∼34% +9%
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83)
50.8 runs/min ∼32% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.7 runs/min ∼32% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=165, last 2 years)
50.5 runs/min ∼32% +3%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
49.2 runs/min ∼31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (9 - 54.9, n=9)
46.1 runs/min ∼29% -6%
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)
9 runs/min ∼6% -82%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
184 Points ∼100% +139%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
101 Points ∼55% +31%
Google Pixel 4 XL (Chrome 80)
100 Points ∼54% +30%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
94 Points ∼51% +22%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
77 Points ∼42%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=206, last 2 years)
76.9 Points ∼42% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
76 Points ∼41% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=13)
71.5 Points ∼39% -7%
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83)
71 Points ∼39% -8%
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)
20 Points ∼11% -74%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
48819 Points ∼100% +162%
Google Pixel 4 XL (Chrome 80)
24044 Points ∼49% +29%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
22572 Points ∼46% +21%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
19143 Points ∼39% +3%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
18629 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
18556 Points ∼38% 0%
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83)
18219 Points ∼37% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=215, last 2 years)
16888 Points ∼35% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=14)
16671 Points ∼34% -11%
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)
3592 Points ∼7% -81%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)
15230.1 ms * ∼100% -517%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=218, last 2 years)
4305 ms * ∼28% -74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2359 - 15230, n=14)
3721 ms * ∼24% -51%
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83)
2973.3 ms * ∼20% -20%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
2834.8 ms * ∼19% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
2602.2 ms * ∼17% -5%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
2469.8 ms * ∼16%
Google Pixel 4 XL (Chrome 80)
2398.3 ms * ∼16% +3%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
2072.2 ms * ∼14% +16%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
572.8 ms * ∼4% +77%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Google Pixel 5Google Pixel 4Google Pixel 4 XLOnePlus NordVivo X50 ProXiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5GZTE Axon 11 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-3%
3%
30%
10%
42%
34%
2%
4%
Sequential Read 256KB
851.37
655.4
-23%
870.91
2%
955.5
12%
924.65
9%
979.54
15%
955.97
12%
772 (427 - 999, n=81)
-9%
724 (41.9 - 2037, n=283, last 2 years)
-15%
Sequential Write 256KB
189.99
247.73
30%
197.41
4%
473.1
149%
209.11
10%
476.87
151%
417.09
120%
256 (182 - 511, n=81)
35%
312 (11.9 - 1321, n=283, last 2 years)
64%
Random Read 4KB
138.93
122.38
-12%
142.24
2%
126.7
-9%
165.23
19%
156.45
13%
166.27
20%
145 (92.6 - 239, n=81)
4%
129 (13.5 - 325, n=283, last 2 years)
-7%
Random Write 4KB
155.87
146.64
-6%
164.18
5%
104.5
-33%
156.8
1%
138.47
-11%
128.35
-18%
118 (18.2 - 290, n=81)
-24%
113 (4.97 - 330, n=283, last 2 years)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
88.31 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76 (13.4 - 88.3, n=43)
76.1 (13.4 - 154, n=185, last 2 years)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
66.41 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.6 (8.4 - 72.4, n=43)
58.1 (1.7 - 83.3, n=185, last 2 years)
05101520253035404550556065707580859088908590908990899087909090909089889089868789879090909089899090908986898990889088909090909089909090909089909087899089908989909088909089878990899090908987899090909088888689909090878988888890878787898788899079899090889090909090888990909089899090909089899089908989898989908890859090899089908790909090908988908986878987909090908989909090898689899088908890909090908990909090908990908789908990898990908890908987899089909090898789909090908888868990909087898888889087878789878889907989909088909090909088899090908989909090908989908990898989898930303030303030303030303029303130293030303031293030303130293031293129303031303030293031273030303029313030303030303030293130303030303030293130303029303030303030303030303030303030302929293030303030303029303030273031303030303030302930303029313028303030303030292930Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.55.5: Ø89.1 (79-90)
; PUBG Mobile; 1.0.0: Ø29.9 (27-31)
 31.3 °C31.7 °C31.7 °C 
 31.3 °C33.2 °C31.3 °C 
 32.9 °C33.6 °C32.5 °C 
Maximum: 33.6 °C
Moyenne: 32.2 °C
31.9 °C32.3 °C33.3 °C
31.8 °C33.5 °C34.7 °C
32.4 °C34.2 °C35.5 °C
Maximum: 35.5 °C
Moyenne: 33.3 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  26 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.435.12523.336.7312641.54022.6405034.540.76319.942.18014.740.810014.439.712514.944.516017.853.920018.952.825011.754.931513.958.94001359.650010.363.463010.466.880012.471.4100011.177.9125011.284.4160012.782.7200012.375.1250012.675.3315012.778.2400012.780500012.783.2630013.582.980001478.81000013.5711250014.964160001658.5SPL24.891.9N0.688.5median 12.7median 71Delta110.234.935.129.128.925.425.629.426.239.435.527.324.621.624.42426.820.736.819.956.31858.816.855.816.259.615.961.313.56413.965.512.971.31473.414.77414.175.814.277.114.575.315.472.914.975.214.871.91572.115.373.315.368.815.661.215.562.32785.60.964.3median 15.3median 68.81.37.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel 5Google Pixel 4
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Google Pixel 4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.17 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.69 / 0.82 / 0.85 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 2.73 / 4.4 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Google Pixel 5
4080 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Google Pixel 4
2800 mAh
Google Pixel 4 XL
3700 mAh
OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
Vivo X50 Pro
4315 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
ZTE Axon 11 5G
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-116%
-83%
-61%
-106%
-104%
-130%
-65%
-81%
-87%
Idle Minimum *
0.69
0.56
19%
1.01
-46%
0.83
-20%
1.8
-161%
1.18
-71%
1.5
-117%
0.78
-13%
0.965 (0.66 - 1.8, n=15)
-40%
0.932 (0.37 - 2.5, n=234, last 2 years)
-35%
Idle Average *
0.82
2.99
-265%
1.63
-99%
1.24
-51%
2.1
-156%
2.45
-199%
2.2
-168%
1.43
-74%
1.899 (0.82 - 2.55, n=15)
-132%
1.843 (0.82 - 3.94, n=234, last 2 years)
-125%
Idle Maximum *
0.85
3.02
-255%
1.69
-99%
1.25
-47%
2.3
-171%
2.51
-195%
2.9
-241%
1.54
-81%
2.07 (0.85 - 2.9, n=15)
-144%
2.12 (0.85 - 4.2, n=234, last 2 years)
-149%
Load Average *
2.73
4.17
-53%
4.67
-71%
4.98
-82%
3.4
-25%
3.61
-32%
4.4
-61%
5.04
-85%
3.98 (2.73 - 6.8, n=15)
-46%
4.43 (2.1 - 8.4, n=234, last 2 years)
-62%
Load Maximum *
4.4
5.44
-24%
8.78
-100%
9.09
-107%
5.2
-18%
5.36
-22%
7.2
-64%
7.49
-70%
6.19 (4.4 - 10.3, n=15)
-41%
7.21 (3.16 - 12.3, n=234, last 2 years)
-64%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
37h 25min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 28min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
24h 26min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
5h 33min
Google Pixel 5
4080 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Google Pixel 4
2800 mAh
Google Pixel 4 XL
3700 mAh
OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
Vivo X50 Pro
4315 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
ZTE Axon 11 5G
4000 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
-3%
-50%
-23%
-13%
-20%
4%
-24%
Reader / Idle
2245
2765
23%
1007
-55%
2003
-11%
1529
-32%
1683
-25%
1700
-24%
H.264
1466
1147
-22%
617
-58%
1064
-27%
1352
-8%
1403
-4%
1070
-27%
WiFi v1.3
808
866
7%
460
-43%
623
-23%
869
8%
763
-6%
884
9%
679
-16%
Load
333
267
-20%
185
-44%
261
-22%
216
-35%
448
35%
240
-28%

Points positifs

+ châssis (compacité, poids)
+ cerficiation IP68
+ 5G et NFC
+ Android 11 avec des mises à jours certaines
+ appareil photo
+ luminosité de l'écran OLED, 90 Hz
+ autonomie
+ charge sans-fil

Points négatifs

- stockage non extensible
- absence de Wifi 6
- SoC du milieu de gamme
- puissance du son stéréo

Verdict - Le Pixel 5 inverse la tendance

En test : le Google Pixel 5. Modèle de test fourni par Google Allemagne.
En test : le Google Pixel 5. Modèle de test fourni par Google Allemagne.

Avec le Pixel 5, Google fait des choix courageux. Au lieu d'augmenter encore la taille de son smartphone comme la concurrence, le nouvel appareil Google s'avère plutôt compact, avec 6 pouces. Google comble donc un vide, pour ceux qui veulent un appareil compact mais puissant.

L'écran OLED, de double appareil photo et la batterie du Pixel 5 sont ainsi premium. L'écran convainc avec sa luminosité maximale très élevée et des couleurs très fidèles, le double capteur photo prend de très bonnes photos, et l'autonomie du smartphone Google s'avère excellente.

Alors que le Google Pixel 5 s'améliore par rapport au Pixel 4, il reste en retrait de la concurrence en ce qui concerne les technologies. Néanmoins, ceux qui voudraient un smartphone Android 11 avec des mises à jours garanties passeront difficilement à côté.

Cela nous mène à la deuxième décision courageuse : au lieu d'avoir un SoC puissant, que l'on s'attend à trouver dans un smartphone fleuron, le Pixel 5 utilise le Snapdragon 765G, milieu de gamme. Mais l'on ne verra pas vraiment de différences dans un usage classique au quotidien. Il aurait cependant été bon pour le Pixel 5 d'avoir une version supplémentaire avec un SoC plus puissant - l'appareil voulant durer longtemps, des réserves de performances pour le futur auraient été bienvenues.

Le Pixel 5 coûte 630 €, ce qui est intéressant face aux appareils premium de nombreux concurrents, même s'ils sont plus puissants. Cependant, le Pixel 5 pourrait quand même tirer son épingle du jeu avec cette promesse de Google qui pourrait être décisive pour de nombreux clients : le Pixel 5 est équipé d'Android 11, et aura au moins 3 ans de mises à jours de l'OS et de sécurité, selon le fabricant.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Google Pixel 5 - 10/29/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero

Châssis
86%
Clavier
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositif de pointage
96%
Connectivité
51 / 70 → 72%
Poids
92%
Autonomie
91%
Écran
90%
Performances en jeu
28 / 64 → 44%
Performances dans les applications
73 / 86 → 84%
Chauffe
94%