Notebookcheck

Test du Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G : champion du rapport performances / prix à 300 €

La 5G pour tous ! Le Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite permet d'entrer dans le monde de la 5G pour moins de 300 €. Le smartphone Xiaomi abordable possède également des composants très puissants, ainsi qu'un écran AMOLED. Découvrez dans notre test du smartphone Xiaomi si le Mi 10 Lite possède également des défauts.
Marcus Herbrich, T. Hinum (traduit par Prévots),
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Mi 10 Gamme)
Processeur
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Carte graphique
Mémoire
6144 Mo 
Écran
6.57 pouces 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 392 PPP, capacitif, AMOLED, brillant: oui, HDR, 60 Hz
Disque dur
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 Go 
, 107 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrarouge, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: capteur de proximité, accéléromètre, boussole, gyroscope, OTG, Miracast, emetteur IR
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM:2 / 3 / 5 / 8; WCDMA: 1 / 2 / 4 / 5 / 8; LTE FDD:1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 7 / 8 / 20 / 28, LTE TDD:38 / 40 / 41 ; 5G:n1 / n3 / n7 / n28 / n77 / n78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 7.9 x 163.7 x 74.8
Batterie
4160 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Android 10
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 48 MPix (capteur 1/2, 0.8 μm, f/1,79 aperture, lentille 6P) + 8 MP (120° ultra grand-angle, ouverture f/2,2) + 2 MP (1,75μm, ƒ/2,4) + 2 MP (1,75μm, ƒ/2,4)
Appareil photo secondaire: 16 MPix (f/2,5, 1/3,06", 1,0 µm)
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, chargeur, étui de protection, câble USB C, outil pour carte SIM, manuel utilisateur, carte de garantie, MiUI, 12 Mois Garantie, Widevine L1, DAS : 0.79 W/kg (tête), 1,18 W/kg (corps) , fanless
Poids
192 g, Alimentation: 78 g
Prix
350 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Appareils concurrents

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Drive
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
84 %
09/20
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080
82 %
02/20
Samsung Galaxy A71
SD 730, Adreno 618
179 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.7"2400x1080
83 %
08/20
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
80 %
08/20
realme 6 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
195 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.6"2400x1080
83 %
09/20
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
SD 730G, Adreno 618
204 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
82 %
07/20
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.5"2400x1080
83 %
09/20
OnePlus Nord
SD 765G, Adreno 620
184 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.44"2440x1080
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite en Dream White
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite en Dream White
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G

Comparaison des tailles

165.75 mm 76.68 mm 8.8 mm 209 g163.8 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 195 g163.7 mm 74.8 mm 7.9 mm 192 g163.6 mm 76 mm 7.7 mm 179 g162.31 mm 75 mm 8.58 mm 189 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.67 mm 204 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 (563min - 668max) MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (545min - 662max) MBit/s ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
619 (283min - 670max) MBit/s ∼95% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
341 (334min - 349max) MBit/s ∼52% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
338 (295min - 356max) MBit/s ∼52% -46%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
333 (319min - 345max) MBit/s ∼51% -47%
realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
292 (145min - 352max) MBit/s ∼45% -54%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=600)
282 MBit/s ∼43% -55%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 (618min - 677max) MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
563 (275min - 666max) MBit/s ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
324 (310min - 330max) MBit/s ∼49% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
317 (151min - 367max) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
290 (137min - 336max) MBit/s ∼43% -57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=600)
268 MBit/s ∼40% -60%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
255 (234min - 277max) MBit/s ∼38% -62%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø627 (545-662)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø668 (618-677)
GPS Garmin Edge 520.
GPS Garmin Edge 520.
GPS Garmin Edge 520.
GPS Garmin Edge 520.
GPS Garmin Edge 520.
GPS Garmin Edge 520.
GPS Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite.
GPS Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite.
GPS Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite.
GPS Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite.
GPS Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite.
GPS Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G - Ultra grand-angle .
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G - Ultra grand-angle .
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G - Appareil photo principal.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G - Appareil photo principal.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G - Zoom x2.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G - Zoom x2.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G - Zoom x10 (maxi).
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G - Zoom x10 (maxi).

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Main cameraLow lightUltra wide-angleMain camera
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker
27 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
38 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
25 ∆E
51 ∆E
53.4 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
38.1 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
55.9 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
54.7 ∆E
56.1 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
35.1 ∆E
23 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G: 37.64 ∆E min: 12.99 - max: 56.06 ∆E
ColorChecker
5.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
1 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G: 5.37 ∆E min: 0.98 - max: 10.11 ∆E
574
cd/m²
574
cd/m²
579
cd/m²
579
cd/m²
584
cd/m²
585
cd/m²
591
cd/m²
588
cd/m²
594
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 594 cd/m² Moyenne: 583.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.6 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 97 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 584 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.17 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6
99% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.231
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.57
Samsung Galaxy A71
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
realme 6 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.6
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5
OnePlus Nord
AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.44
Screen
-49%
-18%
-159%
16%
-42%
-32%
Brightness middle
584
629
8%
610
4%
442
-24%
605
4%
466
-20%
529
-9%
Brightness
583
646
11%
579
-1%
419
-28%
608
4%
457
-22%
531
-9%
Brightness Distribution
97
95
-2%
92
-5%
90
-7%
95
-2%
91
-6%
94
-3%
Black Level *
0.37
0.37
0.61
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.17
2.7
-131%
1.8
-54%
6.1
-421%
0.84
28%
2.2
-88%
2.53
-116%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.95
6
-103%
3
-2%
9.7
-229%
1.8
39%
4.6
-56%
4.52
-53%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.7
3
-76%
2.5
-47%
5.9
-247%
1.3
24%
2.7
-59%
1.7
-0%
Gamma
2.231 99%
2.1 105%
2.31 95%
2.35 94%
2.211 100%
2.24 98%
2.249 98%
CCT
6341 103%
6340 103%
6864 95%
7631 85%
6310 103%
6633 98%
6462 101%
Contrast
1649
1195
764

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 241.5 Hz

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 241.5 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) .

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 241.5 Hz est relativement faible, les personnes les plus sensibles devraient percevoir un scintillement et être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire accrue (avec le niveau de luminosité indiqué)

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 17531 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 5 ms hausse
↘ 3 ms chute
L'écran montre de faibles temps de réponse, un bon écran pour jouer.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
10 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 5 ms hausse
↘ 5 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.7 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
OpenCL Score 5.2 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1293 Points ∼63%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1242 Points ∼61% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1242 - 1302, n=5)
1266 Points ∼62% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 5532, n=32)
2039 Points ∼100% +58%
Vulkan Score 5.2 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1183 Points ∼66%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1169 Points ∼65% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1128 - 1265, n=5)
1186 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 4789, n=33)
1785 Points ∼100% +51%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
982 Points ∼46%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1063 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
903 Points ∼42%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
2137 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1004 - 1192, n=5)
1082 Points ∼51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=67)
1668 Points ∼78%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
861 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1163 Points ∼65%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1201 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1090 Points ∼61%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
Points ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1178 - 1266, n=5)
1223 Points ∼68%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=62)
1789 Points ∼100%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1908 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1647 Points ∼68% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1771 Points ∼73% -7%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1759 Points ∼72% -8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points ∼69% -11%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
2434 Points ∼100% +28%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1966 Points ∼81% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1520 - 1966, n=10)
1803 Points ∼74% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=121)
1945 Points ∼80% +2%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
673 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
542 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
569 Points ∼85% -15%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
567 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
547 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
642 Points ∼95% -5%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
611 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (554 - 673, n=10)
602 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=121)
553 Points ∼82% -18%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8968 Points ∼96%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
9324 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8591 - 9965, n=3)
9175 Points ∼98% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=357)
4918 Points ∼53% -45%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7765 Points ∼79%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
9860 Points ∼100% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (6213 - 7765, n=3)
7214 Points ∼73% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13589, n=420)
5027 Points ∼51% -35%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2863 Points ∼92%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
3113 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2689 - 2882, n=3)
2811 Points ∼90% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4965, n=420)
1539 Points ∼49% -46%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7786 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7773 Points ∼77% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7829 Points ∼77% +1%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
10106 Points ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7628 Points ∼75% -2%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
9527 Points ∼94% +22%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9427 Points ∼93% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (7737 - 9989, n=10)
8349 Points ∼83% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=524)
5973 Points ∼59% -23%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8730 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
8885 Points ∼64% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
9091 Points ∼66% +4%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
13777 Points ∼100% +58%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
8941 Points ∼65% +2%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
13099 Points ∼95% +50%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
10876 Points ∼79% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8730 - 10876, n=10)
9710 Points ∼70% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=682)
6555 Points ∼48% -25%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2893 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2445 Points ∼73% -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2721 Points ∼82% -6%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2562 Points ∼77% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2686 Points ∼81% -7%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
3331 Points ∼100% +15%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2867 Points ∼86% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 2893, n=10)
2696 Points ∼81% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=175)
2664 Points ∼80% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3198 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1731 Points ∼38% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2250 Points ∼50% -30%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2255 Points ∼50% -29%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2143 Points ∼47% -33%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4544 Points ∼100% +42%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3185 Points ∼70% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3059 - 3198, n=10)
3160 Points ∼70% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 9047, n=175)
3054 Points ∼67% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3130 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1851 Points ∼44% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2340 Points ∼56% -25%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2317 Points ∼55% -26%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2244 Points ∼53% -28%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4204 Points ∼100% +34%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3108 Points ∼74% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2877 - 3130, n=10)
3037 Points ∼72% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=175)
2722 Points ∼65% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3495 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2827 Points ∼61% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3236 Points ∼70% -7%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3067 Points ∼66% -12%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3058 Points ∼66% -13%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4642 Points ∼100% +33%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3544 Points ∼76% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1898 - 3765, n=10)
3220 Points ∼69% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=527)
2229 Points ∼48% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3589 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2085 Points ∼42% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2539 Points ∼52% -29%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2558 Points ∼52% -29%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2466 Points ∼50% -31%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4906 Points ∼100% +37%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3556 Points ∼72% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3448 - 3589, n=10)
3550 Points ∼72% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 10043, n=527)
2160 Points ∼44% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3605 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2214 Points ∼46% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2667 Points ∼55% -26%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2656 Points ∼55% -26%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2577 Points ∼53% -29%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4845 Points ∼100% +34%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3553 Points ∼73% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2934 - 3605, n=10)
3453 Points ∼71% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8386, n=528)
2014 Points ∼42% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3492 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2702 Points ∼58% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3226 Points ∼70% -8%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3125 Points ∼67% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3134 Points ∼68% -10%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4637 Points ∼100% +33%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3555 Points ∼77% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1790 - 3651, n=10)
3191 Points ∼69% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=559)
2145 Points ∼46% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5335 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3101 Points ∼49% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3785 Points ∼60% -29%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3835 Points ∼61% -28%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3751 Points ∼59% -30%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
6327 Points ∼100% +19%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5357 Points ∼85% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5070 - 5437, n=10)
5318 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=559)
2908 Points ∼46% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4893 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3002 Points ∼51% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3645 Points ∼62% -26%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3651 Points ∼62% -25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points ∼61% -27%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
5853 Points ∼100% +20%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4815 Points ∼82% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3678 - 4893, n=10)
4607 Points ∼79% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=559)
2441 Points ∼42% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3425 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3210 Points ∼80% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3170 Points ∼79% -7%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3083 Points ∼76% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3257 Points ∼81% -5%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4031 Points ∼100% +18%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3503 Points ∼87% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3133 - 3503, n=10)
3330 Points ∼83% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=608)
2107 Points ∼52% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3321 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2296 Points ∼48% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2356 Points ∼49% -29%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2388 Points ∼50% -28%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2298 Points ∼48% -31%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4804 Points ∼100% +45%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3284 Points ∼68% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3174 - 3342, n=10)
3281 Points ∼68% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 9032, n=608)
1821 Points ∼38% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3346 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2451 Points ∼53% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2499 Points ∼54% -25%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2514 Points ∼55% -25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2459 Points ∼53% -27%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4608 Points ∼100% +38%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3330 Points ∼72% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3187 - 3346, n=10)
3283 Points ∼71% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7678, n=609)
1732 Points ∼38% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3452 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2792 Points ∼69% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3263 Points ∼81% -5%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3076 Points ∼76% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3294 Points ∼81% -5%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4042 Points ∼100% +17%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3476 Points ∼86% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1689 - 3476, n=10)
3162 Points ∼78% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=651)
1977 Points ∼49% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5832 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2999 Points ∼49% -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3620 Points ∼59% -38%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3683 Points ∼60% -37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3610 Points ∼59% -38%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
6158 Points ∼100% +6%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5171 Points ∼84% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4834 - 5832, n=10)
5156 Points ∼84% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12632, n=650)
2412 Points ∼39% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4693 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2950 Points ∼53% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3534 Points ∼64% -25%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3528 Points ∼64% -25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points ∼65% -23%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
5516 Points ∼100% +18%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4665 Points ∼85% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3576 - 4693, n=10)
4468 Points ∼81% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9549, n=653)
2068 Points ∼37% -56%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
20429 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
21898 Points ∼53% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20054 Points ∼48% -2%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
14849 Points ∼36% -27%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
20767 Points ∼50% +2%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
41610 Points ∼100% +104%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21016 Points ∼51% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (14891 - 23203, n=10)
19806 Points ∼48% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=795)
15577 Points ∼37% -24%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
69506 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
52600 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
51789 Points ∼75% -25%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
53600 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
53194 Points ∼77% -23%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
57067 Points ∼82% -18%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69285 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (66415 - 69645, n=10)
68501 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=793)
27196 Points ∼39% -61%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
45304 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
40105 Points ∼76% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38315 Points ∼73% -15%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
33926 Points ∼64% -25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39491 Points ∼75% -13%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
52715 Points ∼100% +16%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
45872 Points ∼87% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (38137 - 47824, n=10)
44153 Points ∼84% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=793)
21154 Points ∼40% -53%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
95 fps ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼75% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
85 fps ∼76% -11%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
85 fps ∼76% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
83 fps ∼74% -13%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
112 fps ∼100% +18%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
97 fps ∼87% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (93 - 97, n=8)
94.8 fps ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=796)
45.8 fps ∼41% -52%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
60 fps ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
59 fps ∼90% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼91% 0%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
60 fps ∼91% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼91% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
60 fps ∼91% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
60 fps ∼91% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (59 - 86, n=8)
65.9 fps ∼100% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=805)
31.5 fps ∼48% -47%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
49 fps ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼59% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼59% -16%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
41 fps ∼59% -16%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼59% -16%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +41%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
55 fps ∼80% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (49 - 56, n=8)
53.9 fps ∼78% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=701)
27.1 fps ∼39% -45%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
55 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
37 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼71% -29%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
38 fps ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼71% -29%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
55 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (46 - 55, n=8)
49.3 fps ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=709)
22.7 fps ∼41% -59%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38 fps ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼64% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼64% -21%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼64% -21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼64% -21%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
47 fps ∼100% +24%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼81% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (35 - 38, n=8)
37.4 fps ∼80% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=564)
21.8 fps ∼46% -43%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
33 fps ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼68% -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼73% -12%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
27 fps ∼68% -18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼73% -12%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
40 fps ∼100% +21%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼85% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (31 - 34, n=8)
32.9 fps ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=566)
19.7 fps ∼49% -40%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼59% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼65% -15%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
11 fps ∼65% -15%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼65% -15%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
17 fps ∼100% +31%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼76% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.9 - 13, n=10)
12.5 fps ∼74% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=320)
11.4 fps ∼67% -12%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.5 fps ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6.7 fps ∼56% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.9 fps ∼58% -19%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
7 fps ∼58% -18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.7 fps ∼56% -21%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
12 fps ∼100% +41%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼71% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.3 - 13, n=10)
8.94 fps ∼75% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=318)
8.12 fps ∼68% -4%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼62% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼65% -19%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼65% -19%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼65% -19%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
26 fps ∼100% +24%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼81% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (20 - 21, n=10)
20.8 fps ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=324)
17.1 fps ∼66% -19%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
24 fps ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼58% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼58% -25%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
19 fps ∼61% -21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼58% -25%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
31 fps ∼100% +29%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼77% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (23 - 24, n=10)
23.6 fps ∼76% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=323)
19.6 fps ∼63% -18%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼63% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼67% -14%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼67% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼63% -19%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
27 fps ∼100% +29%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼78% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (20 - 21, n=8)
20.9 fps ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=489)
14.6 fps ∼54% -30%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼65% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼74% -6%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼70% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼74% -6%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
23 fps ∼100% +28%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼83% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (18 - 19, n=8)
18.4 fps ∼80% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=493)
13 fps ∼57% -28%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
318669 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
247507 Points ∼67% -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
271934 Points ∼74% -15%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
275464 Points ∼75% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
273255 Points ∼74% -14%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
369207 Points ∼100% +16%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
332074 Points ∼90% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (298925 - 332074, n=8)
319178 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 622888, n=118)
322814 Points ∼87% +1%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1462 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1103 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1226 Points ∼84% -16%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1233 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1365 Points ∼93% -7%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
1361 Points ∼93% -7%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1441 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1196 - 1462, n=8)
1365 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=735)
826 Points ∼56% -44%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5201 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3175 Points ∼47% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3757 Points ∼56% -28%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3768 Points ∼56% -28%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3864 Points ∼57% -26%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
6754 Points ∼100% +30%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5203 Points ∼77% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4639 - 5247, n=8)
5115 Points ∼76% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=735)
2543 Points ∼38% -51%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5683 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3466 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4452 Points ∼78% -22%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
4573 Points ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3752 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4609 Points ∼81% -19%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5296 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4556 - 5683, n=8)
5123 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=735)
1895 Points ∼33% -67%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6069 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6426 Points ∼75% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6856 Points ∼80% +13%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
6908 Points ∼80% +14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6305 Points ∼73% +4%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
8619 Points ∼100% +42%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6801 Points ∼79% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (6069 - 6936, n=8)
6667 Points ∼77% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=735)
3495 Points ∼41% -42%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4094 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2972 Points ∼68% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3444 Points ∼79% -16%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3481 Points ∼80% -15%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3342 Points ∼76% -18%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4371 Points ∼100% +7%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4054 Points ∼93% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3674 - 4094, n=8)
3935 Points ∼90% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=735)
1787 Points ∼41% -56%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
54.792 Points ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.232 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
47.901 Points ∼87% -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
46.148 Points ∼84% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 58.7, n=8)
44.4 Points ∼81% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=195)
41.1 Points ∼75% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
36.578 Points ∼67% -27%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
96.293 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
93.643 Points ∼97%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
89.577 Points ∼93% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
86.75 Points ∼90% -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
82.347 Points ∼86% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (10.8 - 94.8, n=5)
76.6 Points ∼80% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
65.293 Points ∼68% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=625)
47.6 Points ∼49% -49%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.7 runs/min ∼100%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
49.5 runs/min ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
45.2 runs/min ∼89% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (9 - 54.9, n=6)
44.8 runs/min ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=177)
43 runs/min ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
40.4 runs/min ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
32.8 runs/min ∼65% -35%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
115 Points ∼100% +51%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
76 Points ∼66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=8)
71.3 Points ∼62% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
71 Points ∼62% -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
70 Points ∼61% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=262)
70 Points ∼61% -8%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
67 Points ∼58% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
60 Points ∼52% -21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
19727 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
18556 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
17265 Points ∼88% -7%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
17157 Points ∼87% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=8)
16410 Points ∼83% -12%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
16197 Points ∼82% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
12771 Points ∼65% -31%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=793)
7954 Points ∼40% -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1854 - 59466, n=819)
9707 ms * ∼100% -273%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2602 - 15230, n=8)
4320 ms * ∼45% -66%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
3435.5 ms * ∼35% -32%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
3033.1 ms * ∼31% -17%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
2940.5 ms * ∼30% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
2850.1 ms * ∼29% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
2602.2 ms * ∼27%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
2254.1 ms * ∼23% +13%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5GSamsung Galaxy A71Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Prorealme 6 ProXiaomi Mi Note 10 LiteHuawei P40 Lite 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-40%
-38%
-23%
-32%
1%
-25%
-69%
Random Write 4KB
138.47
109.57
-21%
112.93
-18%
154
11%
125.75
-9%
249.66
80%
109 (18.2 - 290, n=60)
-21%
36.4 (0.14 - 319, n=890)
-74%
Random Read 4KB
156.45
112.25
-28%
122.58
-22%
158.66
1%
134.57
-14%
146.07
-7%
144 (96.8 - 239, n=60)
-8%
59.7 (1.59 - 324, n=890)
-62%
Sequential Write 256KB
476.87
192.38
-60%
171.09
-64%
203.28
-57%
213.22
-55%
188.01
-61%
240 (182 - 503, n=60)
-50%
129 (2.99 - 911, n=890)
-73%
Sequential Read 256KB
979.54
493.04
-50%
498.15
-49%
512.61
-48%
501.29
-49%
905.47
-8%
767 (427 - 999, n=60)
-22%
345 (12.1 - 1802, n=890)
-65%
PUBG mobile
01020304050Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø39.9 (34-41)
; Balanced: Ø39.9 (39-41)
; HD: Ø29.9 (25-31)
Asphalt 9 Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø29.7 (14-32)
; Standard / low: Ø30 (28-31)
 39.7 °C38.6 °C35.2 °C 
 40.5 °C39.1 °C35.5 °C 
 40.7 °C38.5 °C35.6 °C 
Maximum: 40.7 °C
Moyenne: 38.2 °C
33.5 °C37.3 °C37.5 °C
33.2 °C37.9 °C38.8 °C
33.9 °C37.6 °C38.2 °C
Maximum: 38.8 °C
Moyenne: 36.4 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  42.9 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.845.82539.944.33131.935.54038.936.65043.740.96329.830.38025.926.510026.333.312524.938.516021.642.22001942.725018.94631518.15440016.66150016.265.863014.969.78001568.7100015.671.9125014.972.6160014.970.1200015.673.4250014.671.3315014.268.1400014.165500014.461630014.665.6800014.968.61000015.268.41250015.457.11600015.756.6SPL66.36470.627.581.5N19.715.825.3150.4median 15.4median 65.6Delta2.18.737.232.224.426.327.329.722.729.53330.526.725.623.420.82122.417.621.518.233.814.740.91550.21656.715.759.514.465.514.365.914.269.414.270.513.869.914.970.814.573.514.67414.376.714.475.614.973.414.47314.675.31574.915.168.815.561.626.785.20.862median 14.7median 69.40.611.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5GSamsung Galaxy A71
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A71 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 1.5 / 2.2 / 2.9 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 4.4 / 7.2 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A71
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh
realme 6 Pro
4300 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
4000 mAh
OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
27%
20%
13%
33%
20%
11%
20%
22%
Idle Minimum *
1.5
0.63
58%
0.75
50%
0.92
39%
0.8
47%
0.65
57%
1.8
-20%
0.961 (0.66 - 1.8, n=11)
36%
0.891 (0.2 - 3.4, n=897)
41%
Idle Average *
2.2
1.49
32%
2.19
-0%
1.79
19%
1.1
50%
2.25
-2%
2.1
5%
1.964 (0.82 - 2.55, n=11)
11%
1.756 (0.6 - 6.2, n=896)
20%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
1.51
48%
2.24
23%
1.88
35%
1.8
38%
2.29
21%
2.3
21%
2.13 (0.85 - 2.9, n=11)
27%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=897)
30%
Load Average *
4.4
4.62
-5%
3.88
12%
5.41
-23%
3.7
16%
3.7
16%
3.4
23%
3.96 (2.73 - 6.8, n=11)
10%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=891)
6%
Load Maximum *
7.2
7.11
1%
5.97
17%
7.59
-5%
6.1
15%
6.46
10%
5.2
28%
6.02 (4.4 - 7.5, n=11)
16%
6.11 (1.2 - 14.2, n=891)
15%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
28h 03min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 44min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
23h 23min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
7h 28min
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A71
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh
realme 6 Pro
4300 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
4000 mAh
OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
-11%
5%
17%
8%
18%
-12%
Reader / Idle
1683
2164
29%
2336
39%
2249
34%
2003
19%
H.264
1403
1164
-17%
1096
-22%
1370
-2%
1064
-24%
WiFi v1.3
884
815
-8%
1175
33%
1031
17%
1095
24%
1047
18%
869
-2%
Load
448
242
-46%
303
-32%
337
-25%
261
-42%

Points positifs

+ écran OLED
+ autonomie
+ qualité de construction
+ vitesse WLAN
+ performances (au vu du prix)
+ haut-parleur mono
+ appareil photo en plein jour...

Points négatifs

- ...mais pas de nuit
- absence d'étanchéité
- nombre de fréquences LTE
- absence de lecteur SD
- absence de lentille de zoom
- seulement en 60 Hz

Verdict

En test : le Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite. Modèle de test fourni par notebooksbilliger.de.
En test : le Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite. Modèle de test fourni par notebooksbilliger.de.

Vu la multitude de modèles que les fabricants chinois ont lancé sur le marché cette année, il est difficile de tous les suivre. Heureusement Xiaomi semble ne pas chercher une production de masse au détriment de la qualité, le Mi 10 Lite s'avérant être un très bon smartphone du milieu de gamme.

Vu son prix, la version Lite de la série Mi 10 peut difficilement être prise à défaut. L'autonomie est excellent, MiUI 12 tourne très bien, la qualité de construction et les matériaux sont d'un bon niveau, et le sans-fil est rapide. Et l'appareil du milieu de gamme possède de nombreuses fonctionnalités, dont la 5G et un puissant SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, ainsi qu'un écran OLED. La qualité photo de l'appareil principal nous a également surpris, que ce soit dû au capteur OmniVision ou au traitement logiciel - mais Xiaomi n'a jusqu'à maintenant jamais été très bon avec les algorithmes photo. Les photos de l'appareil 48 MP sont donc de bonne qualité.

Ceux qui se contenteront de 60 Hz auront dans le Mi 10 Lite un bon smartphone du milieu de gamme.

Le Mi 10 Lite reste néanmoins un appareil du milieu de gamme. La photo en faible luminosité reste moyenne, la lentille ultra-grand-angle n'est pas toujours bonne de jour, et la charge sans-fil et le Wifi 6 ne sont pas de la partie. Le Mi 10 Lite ne possède pas non plus de certification IP ni de lecteur de carte SD. Nous apprécierons un taux de rafraîchissement de plus de 60 Hz pour la prochaine génération de Mi Lite, la concurrence ne chômant pas.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G - 08/04/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Châssis
84%
Clavier
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositif de pointage
93%
Connectivité
50 / 70 → 71%
Poids
89%
Autonomie
92%
Écran
90%
Performances en jeu
37 / 64 → 57%
Performances dans les applications
73 / 86 → 85%
Chauffe
89%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Appareil photo
72%
Moyenne
78%
84%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G : champion du rapport performances / prix à 300 €
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-09- 9 (Update: 2020-09- 9)