Notebookcheck

Test du OnePlus Nord : le retour du champion du rapport qualité / prix ?

Challenger bleu arctique. OnePlus demande moins de 400 € pour le OnePlus Nord, alors qu'il s'agit d'un smartphone avec écran 90 Hz, 5G, un SoC puissant, un stockage abondant, et un extérieur premium. OnePlus est-il enfin redevenu le champion sans rivaux du meilleur smartphone à prix contenu ?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Andrea Grüblinger (traduit par Prévots), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
OnePlus Nord (Nord Gamme)
Processeur
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Carte graphique
Mémoire
12288 Mo 
Écran
6.44 pouces 20:9, 2440 x 1080 pixel 414 PPP, capacitif, AMOLED, brillant: oui, 90 Hz
Disque dur
256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 Go 
, 234 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: USB C, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, boussole, gyroscope, capteur de proximité
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G, 3G, 4G (bandes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8,12,17,18,19,20,26, 28, 32,34,38 ,39, 40, 41, 66) ; 5G (N1,3,7,28,78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.2 x 158.3 x 73.3
Batterie
4115 mAh Lithium-Polymère, Warp Charge 30T
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Android 10
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 48 MPix 0,8 μm/48MP, 1,6 μm (4 en 1)/12Mp ; 6 lentilles, f/1,75, OIS (appareil photo principal) ; 8 MP, f/2,25, 119° champ de vue (lentille grand-angle) ; 2 MP, f/2,4 (lentille macro) ; 5 MP, f/2,4 (objectif à profondeur de champ)
Appareil photo secondaire: 32 MPix 0,8 μm / 32 MP, 1,6 μm (4 en 1)/8MP, f/2,45, lentille à focus fixe (appareil photo principal) ; 8 MP, f/2,45, 105° champ de vue (lentille grand-angle)
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono sur la tranche inférieure, Clavier: virtuel, chargeur, câble USB, coque en silicone, outil pour carte SIM, 24 Mois Garantie, LTE 4x4 MIMO Cat. 18 / Cat. 13 (1,2 Gb/s réception, 150 Mb/s envoi) ; DAS: 0,90 W/kg (tête), 1,27 W/kg (corps), fanless
Poids
184 g, Alimentation: 139 g
Prix
499 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
relation de la recherche.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Appareils du comparatif

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Drive
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
83 %
09/20
OnePlus Nord
SD 765G, Adreno 620
184 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.44"2440x1080
85 %
06/20
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
148 g128 GB NVMe4.70"1334x750
82 %
07/20
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
86 %
03/20
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
SD 855, Adreno 640
186 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.70"2400x1080
83 %
12/19
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
SD 730G, Adreno 618
208 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
OnePlus Nord
OnePlus Nord
OnePlus Nord
OnePlus Nord
OnePlus Nord
OnePlus Nord
OnePlus Nord

Comparaison des tailles

162.31 mm 75 mm 8.58 mm 189 g162.5 mm 75.6 mm 8.1 mm 186 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.7 mm 208 g158.3 mm 73.3 mm 8.2 mm 184 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 148 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
818 (400min - 892max) MBit/s ∼100% +45%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
563 (275min - 666max) MBit/s ∼69%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=307, last 2 years)
439 MBit/s ∼54% -22%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
327 (321min - 333max) MBit/s ∼40% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
327 (155min - 377max) MBit/s ∼40% -42%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
255 (234min - 277max) MBit/s ∼31% -55%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 (563min - 668max) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
618 (321min - 653max) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
612 (473min - 652max) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=307, last 2 years)
437 MBit/s ∼67% -33%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
333 (319min - 345max) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
331 (317min - 341max) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665563605621638660644648651658663656655659663648649656648667658651662665653656661648663653668563605621638660644648651658663656655659663648649656648667658651662665653656661648663653668600659656659660658666662659655647663663661664661645515411462429460472416406643659494428458Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (563-668)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø580 (406-666)
Localisation Garmin Edge 520 : vue générale.
Localisation Garmin Edge 520 : vue générale.
Localisation Garmin Edge 520 : virage.
Localisation Garmin Edge 520 : virage.
Localisation Garmin Edge 520 : pont.
Localisation Garmin Edge 520 : pont.
Localisation OnePlus Nord : vue générale.
Localisation OnePlus Nord : vue générale.
Localisation OnePlus Nord : virage.
Localisation OnePlus Nord : virage.
Localisation OnePlus Nord : pont.
Localisation OnePlus Nord : pont.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3Scene 4
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker
17.8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
15 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
15 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus Nord: 12.3 ∆E min: 3.58 - max: 19.57 ∆E
ColorChecker
26.8 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
32 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
37 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
49.1 ∆E
50.8 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
47.9 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
48 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus Nord: 35.44 ∆E min: 14.19 - max: 51.55 ∆E
550
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
516
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
549
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 550 cd/m² Moyenne: 530.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.8 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 94 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 529 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.53 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.249
OnePlus Nord
AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.44
Apple iPhone SE 2020
IPS, 1334x750, 4.70
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Super AMOLED Plus, 2400x1080, 6.70
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen
27%
-13%
-13%
-40%
Brightness middle
529
688
30%
466
-12%
622
18%
625
18%
Brightness
531
659
24%
457
-14%
630
19%
607
14%
Brightness Distribution
94
92
-2%
91
-3%
96
2%
89
-5%
Black Level *
0.28
0.61
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.53
1
60%
2.2
13%
2.7
-7%
4.38
-73%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.52
2.2
51%
4.6
-2%
5.9
-31%
6.83
-51%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.7
1.7
-0%
2.7
-59%
3
-76%
4.1
-141%
Gamma
2.249 98%
2.25 98%
2.24 98%
2.09 105%
2.251 98%
CCT
6462 101%
6790 96%
6633 98%
6246 104%
7251 90%
Contrast
2457
764

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 367.6 Hz

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 367.6 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) .

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 367.6 Hz est relativement élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevLa fréquence de rafraîchissement de 367.6 Hz est relativement élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.oir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue. Néanmoins certaines personnes pourront toujours percevoir un scintillement.

En comparaison, 52 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 15377 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
7 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 3 ms hausse
↘ 4 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (23.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 3 ms hausse
↘ 3 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (37.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
611 Points ∼46%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
1336 Points ∼100% +119%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
642 Points ∼48% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
740 Points ∼55% +21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
543 Points ∼41% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (554 - 673, n=17)
603 Points ∼45% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=245, last 2 years)
582 Points ∼44% -5%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1966 Points ∼60%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
3281 Points ∼100% +67%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
2434 Points ∼74% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
2722 Points ∼83% +38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1727 Points ∼53% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1520 - 1966, n=17)
1781 Points ∼54% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4455, n=245, last 2 years)
1988 Points ∼61% +1%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1242 Points ∼55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1231 - 1302, n=10)
1265 Points ∼56% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=140, last 2 years)
2246 Points ∼100% +81%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1169 Points ∼54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (168 - 1278, n=12)
1060 Points ∼49% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=137, last 2 years)
2166 Points ∼100% +85%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
10876 Points ∼83%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
13099 Points ∼100% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11718 Points ∼89% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
9052 Points ∼69% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8687 - 11041, n=16)
9734 Points ∼74% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=213, last 2 years)
10002 Points ∼76% -8%
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9427 Points ∼93%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
9527 Points ∼94% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10093 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7558 Points ∼75% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (7245 - 9989, n=17)
8308 Points ∼82% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=260, last 2 years)
7923 Points ∼78% -16%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
45872 Points ∼47%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
97290 Points ∼100% +112%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
52715 Points ∼54% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
78551 Points ∼81% +71%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39608 Points ∼41% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (38137 - 48201, n=17)
44398 Points ∼46% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=198, last 2 years)
40524 Points ∼42% -12%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69285 Points ∼33%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
209431 Points ∼100% +202%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
57067 Points ∼27% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
108114 Points ∼52% +56%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
51267 Points ∼24% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (56690 - 70216, n=17)
67538 Points ∼32% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=198, last 2 years)
58817 Points ∼28% -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21016 Points ∼51%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
33851 Points ∼81% +61%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
41610 Points ∼100% +98%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
40137 Points ∼96% +91%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
22054 Points ∼53% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (14891 - 28331, n=17)
20632 Points ∼50% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=198, last 2 years)
23289 Points ∼56% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4665 Points ∼62%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
6168 Points ∼82% +32%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
5516 Points ∼74% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7500 Points ∼100% +61%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points ∼46% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2972 - 4693, n=17)
4318 Points ∼58% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=257, last 2 years)
3439 Points ∼46% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5171 Points ∼53%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
9218 Points ∼95% +78%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
6158 Points ∼64% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9670 Points ∼100% +87%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3498 Points ∼36% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2844 - 5832, n=17)
4882 Points ∼50% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=257, last 2 years)
4034 Points ∼42% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3476 Points ∼83%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2857 Points ∼68% -18%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4042 Points ∼96% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4201 Points ∼100% +21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3191 Points ∼76% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1689 - 3529, n=17)
3237 Points ∼77% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=257, last 2 years)
2783 Points ∼66% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4815 Points ∼45%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
10699 Points ∼100% +122%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
5853 Points ∼55% +22%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7842 Points ∼73% +63%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3535 Points ∼33% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3678 - 4893, n=17)
4562 Points ∼43% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=279, last 2 years)
4162 Points ∼39% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5357 Points ∼27%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
20135 Points ∼100% +276%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
6327 Points ∼31% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10410 Points ∼52% +94%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3646 Points ∼18% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4036 - 5437, n=17)
5181 Points ∼26% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=279, last 2 years)
5318 Points ∼26% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3555 Points ∼77%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4052 Points ∼87% +14%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4637 Points ∼100% +30%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4208 Points ∼91% +18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3193 Points ∼69% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1790 - 3651, n=17)
3275 Points ∼71% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=277, last 2 years)
2981 Points ∼64% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3330 Points ∼58%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4050 Points ∼71% +22%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4608 Points ∼80% +38%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5727 Points ∼100% +72%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2394 Points ∼42% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2261 - 3346, n=17)
3162 Points ∼55% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=255, last 2 years)
2657 Points ∼46% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3284 Points ∼52%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4573 Points ∼72% +39%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4804 Points ∼76% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6312 Points ∼100% +92%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2237 Points ∼35% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2048 - 3342, n=17)
3137 Points ∼50% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=255, last 2 years)
2818 Points ∼45% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3503 Points ∼81%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2892 Points ∼67% -17%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4031 Points ∼93% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4324 Points ∼100% +23%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3171 Points ∼73% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2964 - 3556, n=17)
3331 Points ∼77% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=255, last 2 years)
2817 Points ∼65% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3553 Points ∼57%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
5688 Points ∼91% +60%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4845 Points ∼77% +36%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6285 Points ∼100% +77%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2561 Points ∼41% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2934 - 3605, n=17)
3413 Points ∼54% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=277, last 2 years)
3356 Points ∼53% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3556 Points ∼45%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
7847 Points ∼100% +121%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4906 Points ∼63% +38%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7148 Points ∼91% +101%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2425 Points ∼31% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2814 - 3592, n=17)
3467 Points ∼44% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=277, last 2 years)
3803 Points ∼48% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3544 Points ∼76%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2898 Points ∼62% -18%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4642 Points ∼100% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4418 Points ∼95% +25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3188 Points ∼69% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1898 - 3765, n=17)
3288 Points ∼71% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=277, last 2 years)
3013 Points ∼65% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3108 Points ∼63%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4204 Points ∼85% +35%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4962 Points ∼100% +60%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2265 Points ∼46% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2287 - 3130, n=17)
2966 Points ∼60% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=212, last 2 years)
2612 Points ∼53% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3185 Points ∼55%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4544 Points ∼78% +43%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5817 Points ∼100% +83%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2153 Points ∼37% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 3198, n=17)
3053 Points ∼52% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=212, last 2 years)
2922 Points ∼50% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2867 Points ∼86%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
3331 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3276 Points ∼98% +14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2768 Points ∼83% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 2979, n=17)
2742 Points ∼82% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=212, last 2 years)
2649 Points ∼80% -8%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
60 fps ∼96%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (43 - 86, n=15)
62.5 fps ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=217, last 2 years)
58.6 fps ∼94% -2%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
97 fps ∼39%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
250 fps ∼100% +158%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
112 fps ∼45% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
166 fps ∼66% +71%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼34% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (48 - 97, n=15)
88.7 fps ∼35% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=217, last 2 years)
110 fps ∼44% +13%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼83%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +20%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
55 fps ∼92% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼63% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (30 - 55, n=15)
46.5 fps ∼78% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=215, last 2 years)
46.3 fps ∼77% -7%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
55 fps ∼37%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
149 fps ∼100% +171%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
69 fps ∼46% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
99 fps ∼66% +80%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼28% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (31 - 56, n=15)
51.1 fps ∼34% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=216, last 2 years)
64 fps ∼43% +16%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼57%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +76%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
40 fps ∼67% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼95% +68%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼45% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (21 - 37, n=15)
31.5 fps ∼53% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=214, last 2 years)
36.5 fps ∼61% +7%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼41%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
93 fps ∼100% +145%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
47 fps ∼51% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
69 fps ∼74% +82%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼32% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (22 - 38, n=15)
35.3 fps ∼38% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=214, last 2 years)
43.9 fps ∼47% +16%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼32%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +216%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
23 fps ∼38% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
37 fps ∼62% +95%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼25% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (11 - 21, n=15)
17.7 fps ∼30% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=213, last 2 years)
22.9 fps ∼38% +21%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼36%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
59 fps ∼100% +181%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
27 fps ∼46% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
43 fps ∼73% +105%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼29% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (12 - 21, n=15)
19.7 fps ∼33% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=213, last 2 years)
26.4 fps ∼45% +26%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼35%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +186%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
26 fps ∼43% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
38 fps ∼63% +81%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼27% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (13 - 23, n=17)
20.2 fps ∼34% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=282, last 2 years)
23.2 fps ∼39% +10%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼33%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
72 fps ∼100% +200%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
31 fps ∼43% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼58% +75%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼25% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (12 - 24, n=17)
21.6 fps ∼30% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=281, last 2 years)
26.8 fps ∼37% +12%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼22%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +362%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
17 fps ∼28% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
25 fps ∼42% +92%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼17% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.8 - 15, n=17)
12.3 fps ∼21% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=282, last 2 years)
15.4 fps ∼26% +18%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼27%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
31 fps ∼100% +265%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
12 fps ∼39% +41%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼55% +100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼32% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5.3 - 13, n=17)
8.38 fps ∼27% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=282, last 2 years)
10.5 fps ∼34% +24%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
332074 Points ∼68%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
489463 Points ∼100% +47%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
369207 Points ∼75% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
451559 Points ∼92% +36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
266417 Points ∼54% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (285731 - 332305, n=14)
312767 Points ∼64% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=193, last 2 years)
336808 Points ∼69% +1%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4054 Points ∼84%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4371 Points ∼90% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4837 Points ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3392 Points ∼70% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3237 - 4094, n=14)
3813 Points ∼79% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 7123, n=200, last 2 years)
3706 Points ∼77% -9%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6801 Points ∼79%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
8619 Points ∼100% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8515 Points ∼99% +25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6445 Points ∼75% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5411 - 6936, n=14)
6506 Points ∼75% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=200, last 2 years)
6767 Points ∼79% 0%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5296 Points ∼100%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4609 Points ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5287 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
4281 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4556 - 5683, n=14)
5099 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=200, last 2 years)
4349 Points ∼82% -18%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5203 Points ∼61%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
6754 Points ∼79% +30%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8598 Points ∼100% +65%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3878 Points ∼45% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2525 - 5247, n=14)
4732 Points ∼55% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=200, last 2 years)
5808 Points ∼68% +12%
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1441 Points ∼100%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
1361 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1414 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1237 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1139 - 1462, n=14)
1372 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=200, last 2 years)
1279 Points ∼89% -11%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
139.668 Points ∼100% +138%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
63.778 Points ∼46% +9%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
58.665 Points ∼42%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
54.792 Points ∼39% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=185, last 2 years)
50.9 Points ∼36% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 60.5, n=12)
47.7 Points ∼34% -19%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
46.038 Points ∼33% -22%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
278.62 Points ∼100% +195%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
112.3 Points ∼40% +19%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
96.293 Points ∼35% +2%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
94.481 Points ∼34%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=196, last 2 years)
91.9 Points ∼33% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (10.8 - 96.9, n=11)
81.1 Points ∼29% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
79.228 Points ∼28% -16%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
158 runs/min ∼100% +195%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
62.2 runs/min ∼39% +16%
OnePlus Nord (Chome 84)
53.6 runs/min ∼34%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=170, last 2 years)
50.9 runs/min ∼32% -5%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
49.5 runs/min ∼31% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (9 - 54.9, n=9)
46.1 runs/min ∼29% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
43.3 runs/min ∼27% -19%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
146 Points ∼100% +45%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
115 Points ∼79% +14%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
101 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
95 Points ∼65% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=204, last 2 years)
79.3 Points ∼54% -21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
77 Points ∼53% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=13)
71.5 Points ∼49% -29%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
48991 Points ∼100% +156%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
22942 Points ∼47% +20%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
19727 Points ∼40% +3%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
19143 Points ∼39%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=211, last 2 years)
17940 Points ∼37% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=14)
16671 Points ∼34% -13%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
16241 Points ∼33% -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=213, last 2 years)
3907 ms * ∼100% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2359 - 15230, n=14)
3721 ms * ∼95% -31%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
2834.8 ms * ∼73%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
2769.8 ms * ∼71% +2%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
2254.1 ms * ∼58% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
2138.6 ms * ∼55% +25%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
549.9 ms * ∼14% +81%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

OnePlus NordHuawei P40 Lite 5GSamsung Galaxy S10 LiteXiaomi Mi Note 10OnePlus 8Average 256 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
22%
46%
-25%
76%
-1%
-5%
Sequential Read 256KB
955.5
905.47
-5%
1488.59
56%
480.5
-50%
1706.7
79%
827 (496 - 967, n=19)
-13%
778 (41.9 - 2037, n=288, last 2 years)
-19%
Sequential Write 256KB
473.1
188.01
-60%
524.56
11%
243.6
-49%
747.87
58%
314 (199 - 474, n=19)
-34%
344 (11.9 - 1321, n=288, last 2 years)
-27%
Random Read 4KB
126.7
146.07
15%
191.67
51%
106.2
-16%
215
70%
159 (108 - 208, n=19)
25%
138 (13.5 - 325, n=288, last 2 years)
9%
Random Write 4KB
104.5
249.66
139%
173.54
66%
118.9
14%
203.85
95%
125 (22.1 - 182, n=19)
20%
124 (5.2 - 330, n=288, last 2 years)
19%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.35 (NM Card)
76.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.8 (25.5 - 82.6, n=4)
76.2 (13.4 - 154, n=166, last 2 years)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.67 (NM Card)
61.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
56.2 (16.7 - 73.3, n=4)
58.5 (8.4 - 83.3, n=166, last 2 years)
 45.7 °C42.8 °C40.7 °C 
 45.8 °C43 °C40.3 °C 
 45.2 °C42.7 °C40.5 °C 
Maximum: 45.8 °C
Moyenne: 43 °C
39 °C40.7 °C42.7 °C
38.9 °C40.7 °C43 °C
39 °C41.2 °C42.7 °C
Maximum: 43 °C
Moyenne: 40.9 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  38.9 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2047.242.4253942.13134.336.54039.339.95042.144.46331.734.48026.32610026.427.112525.631.616022.143.920019.353.225018.958.731516.562.74001668.650014.372.963015.773.980015.273.7100013.777.1125011.776.516001274.5200012.470.3250011.171.9315011.269.7400011.867500012.963.5630013.771.8800014.173.4100001475.8125001366.21600011.452.2SPL6863.425.984.9N22.415.80.864.6median 14median 69.7Delta2.69.440.135.232.929.527.131.330.53033.839.525.923.423.61924.622.520.428.319.542.818.746.617.25216.557.914.462.816.366.715.36714.6701471.714.971.814.274.61575.414.776.714.578.514.380.514.678.615.179.71581.314.975.215.3601649.72788.90.976.2median 15median 701.312.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus NordSamsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus Nord audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 1.8 / 2.1 / 2.3 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 3.4 / 5.2 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
Apple iPhone SE 2020
1822 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
37%
5%
9%
-4%
6%
0%
Idle Minimum *
1.8
0.44
76%
0.65
64%
0.58
68%
0.7
61%
0.965 (0.66 - 1.8, n=15)
46%
0.945 (0.37 - 2.5, n=236, last 2 years)
47%
Idle Average *
2.1
1.56
26%
2.25
-7%
1.55
26%
1.8
14%
1.899 (0.82 - 2.55, n=15)
10%
1.822 (0.65 - 3.94, n=236, last 2 years)
13%
Idle Maximum *
2.3
1.63
29%
2.29
-0%
1.64
29%
2.2
4%
2.07 (0.85 - 2.9, n=15)
10%
2.07 (0.69 - 4.2, n=236, last 2 years)
10%
Load Average *
3.4
2.32
32%
3.7
-9%
4.29
-26%
5.2
-53%
3.98 (2.73 - 6.8, n=15)
-17%
4.43 (2.1 - 8.4, n=236, last 2 years)
-30%
Load Maximum *
5.2
4.12
21%
6.46
-24%
8.03
-54%
7.5
-44%
6.19 (4.4 - 10.3, n=15)
-19%
7.25 (3.16 - 12.3, n=236, last 2 years)
-39%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
33h 23min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 29min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
17h 44min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
4h 21min
OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
Apple iPhone SE 2020
1822 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
-26%
20%
4%
30%
Reader / Idle
2003
1938
-3%
2504
25%
2134
7%
H.264
1064
681
-36%
1183
11%
1423
34%
WiFi v1.3
869
694
-20%
1047
20%
823
-5%
1127
30%
Load
261
143
-45%
222
-15%
387
48%

Points positifs

+ rapport performances / prix
+ stockage
+ couleurs de l'écran 90 Hz
+ appareil photo
+ autonomie
+ absence de throttling
+ Wifi
+ géolocalisation

Points négatifs

- absence de certification IP
- luminosité de l'écran
- absence de Wifi 6
- appareil photo en faible luminosité
- chauffe en cas de sollicitations

Verdict

En test : le OnePlus Nord. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par OnePlus Allemagne.
En test : le OnePlus Nord. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par OnePlus Allemagne.

Dans notre test du OnePlus One, nous disions qu'il avait "un impressionnant rapport performances / prix, qui restait sans rivaux".

Cinq ans plus tard, le OnePlus Nord possède également un excellent rapport performances / prix, même s'il n'est plus sans rivaux. Cela est largement dû au fait que des appareils plus anciens, qui étaient plus chers, tel le Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, sont maintenant arrivés au prix du OnePlus Nord.

Vu le prix de lancement des autres appareils, le OnePlus Nord est impressionnant : avec la 5G, un Wifi rapide, un stockage abondant, un SoC puissant, de bons appareils photo polyvalents et un châssis robuste et élégant, il fixe de nouveaux standards pour le milieu de gamme.

Nous n'avons pas grand-chose à critiquer : l'écran pourrait être légèrement plus lumineux, l'appareil photo n'est bon en basse luminosité qu'avec le mode nuit activé, et l'appareil chauffe pas mal.

Le OnePlus Nord est à la hauteur des attentes qu'il suscite : le fabricant est revenu à ses racines, avec un excellent smartphone à petit prix.

Ceux qui utilisent souvent des applis très exigeantes ou du multitâche en arrière-plan avec d'autres applis exigeantes en fonctionnement pourront voir la différence d'avec des smartphones plus haut de gammes. Et quelques fonctionnalités communes de fleurons, tels la charge sans-fil, le Wifi 6 ou le LTE ultrarapides manquent.

Mais le OnePlus Nord demeure un excellent smartphone à petit prix, pour ceux qui peuvent composer avec ses petits compromis.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

OnePlus Nord - 07/25/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Châssis
83%
Clavier
67 / 75 → 89%
Dispositif de pointage
94%
Connectivité
47 / 70 → 67%
Poids
89%
Autonomie
90%
Écran
88%
Performances en jeu
36 / 64 → 57%
Performances dans les applications
77 / 86 → 89%
Chauffe
86%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Appareil photo
71%
Moyenne
77%
83%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Marius Schell
Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 274 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020
contact me via: LinkedIn
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du OnePlus Nord : le retour du champion du rapport qualité / prix ?
Florian Schmitt, 2020-09- 1 (Update: 2020-09- 1)