Notebookcheck

Test du Huawei Nova 5T : un clone Honor avec des améliorations

Inge Schwabe, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn (traduit par Prévots), 12/20/2019

Evolution pertinente. Les smartphones Honor étaient des dérivés rentables de certains modèles Huawei pas trop vieux. Au moins, c’était le cas avant que la filiale ne commence à développer sa propre identité et se mette à caracoler en tête, comme lorsqu’elle a lancé le premier appareil photo 48 MP dans le Honor V20. Mais le Nova 5T du Huawei est vraiment un Honor 20. De cette façon, Huawei peut toujours utiliser les services Google, le Honor 20 ayant été lancé sur le marché avant la date-butoir aux États-Unis.

Huawei Nova 5T (Nova Gamme)
Processeur
HiSilicon Kirin 980
Carte graphique
ARM Mali-G76 MP10
Mémoire
6144 Mo 
Écran
6.26 pouces 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 412 PPP, multitouch 10 points, LTPS, brillant: oui
Disque dur
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 Go 
, , 115 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrarouge, Connectique audio: USB C, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, boussole, capteur à effet Hall, capteur de proximité, gyroscope, USB C
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM : B2 / B3 / B5 / B8, UMTS: B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19, LTE FDD : B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B26 / B28, LTE TD : B38 / B40 / B41, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 7.87 x 154.25 x 73.97
Batterie
3750 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Android 10
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 48 MPix (f/1,8, 28 mm, 1 / 2", 0,8 µm) + 16 MP (13 mm grand-angle, f/2,2, 1 / 3,1") + 2 MP (f/2,4, 27 mm) + 2 MP (f/2,4), LED avec température des couleurs, appareil photo2 API : limité
Appareil photo secondaire: 32 MPix (f/2,0, 0,8µm)
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, écouteurs, chargeur, câble USB C, adaptateur USB C vers écouteurs 3,5 mm, outil pour carte SIM, instructions de démarrage rapide, carte de garantie, film de protection TP, EMUI 10, 24 Mois Garantie, DAS (tête) : 0,84 W/kg, fanless
Poids
174 g, Alimentation: 97 g
Prix
429 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Appareils du comparatif

NoteDateModèlePoidsDriveTailleRésolutionBest Price
84%12/19Huawei Nova 5T
Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10
174 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.26"2340x1080
89%08/19Honor 20
Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10
174 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.26"2340x1080
80%08/19Google Pixel 3a
670, Adreno 616
147 g64 GB eMMC Flash5.6"2220x1080
87%08/19Samsung Galaxy A80
730, Adreno 618
220 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.7"2400x1080
86%05/19Xiaomi Mi 9
855, Adreno 640
173 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.39"2340x1080
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +114%
Google Pixel 3a
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
637 (min: 275, max: 679) MBit/s ∼94% +101%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Adreno 618, 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
428 (min: 360, max: 501) MBit/s ∼63% +35%
Huawei Nova 5T
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
317 (min: 30, max: 340) MBit/s ∼47%
Honor 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
302 (min: 80, max: 331) MBit/s ∼45% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1014, n=479)
235 MBit/s ∼35% -26%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3a
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
541 (min: 422, max: 570) MBit/s ∼100% +72%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼99% +70%
Huawei Nova 5T
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
315 (min: 226, max: 345) MBit/s ∼58%
Honor 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 235, max: 335) MBit/s ∼54% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Adreno 618, 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (min: 249, max: 327) MBit/s ∼52% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 966, n=479)
222 MBit/s ∼41% -30%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510Tooltip
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, ARM Mali-G76 MP10; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø316 (30-340)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, ARM Mali-G76 MP10; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø302 (80-331)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Qualcomm Adreno 618; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø427 (360-501)
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, ARM Mali-G76 MP10; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø315 (226-345)
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, ARM Mali-G76 MP10; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø294 (235-335)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Qualcomm Adreno 618; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø282 (249-327)
GPS Huawei Nova 5T - Vue générale.
GPS Huawei Nova 5T - Vue générale.
GPS Huawei Nova 5T : étang.
GPS Huawei Nova 5T : étang.
GPS Huawei Nova 5T - Zone résidentielle.
GPS Huawei Nova 5T - Zone résidentielle.
GPS Edge 500 - Vue générale.
GPS Edge 500 - Vue générale.
GPS Edge 500 - Etang.
GPS Edge 500 - Etang.
GPS Edge 500 - Zone résidentielle.
GPS Edge 500 - Zone résidentielle.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker Photo
29.1 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
63.5 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
75.1 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
42 ∆E
90.9 ∆E
70.6 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Nova 5T: 46.45 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 90.93 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
8.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Nova 5T: 4.76 ∆E min: 1.37 - max: 12.16 ∆E
Huawei Nova 5T - Mire de test.
Huawei Nova 5T - Mire de test.
Huawei Nova 5T - Mire de test à 1 Lux.
Huawei Nova 5T - Mire de test zoomée.
496
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
516
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
521
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 542 cd/m² Moyenne: 509.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.08 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 86 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 524 cd/m²
Contraste: 1344:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 9.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.34
Huawei Nova 5T
LTPS, 2340x1080, 6.26
Honor 20
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.26
Google Pixel 3a
P-OLED, 2220x1080, 5.6
Samsung Galaxy A80
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen
22%
14%
24%
49%
Brightness middle
524
481
-8%
403
-23%
478
-9%
593
13%
Brightness
510
481
-6%
411
-19%
486
-5%
587
15%
Brightness Distribution
86
95
10%
96
12%
96
12%
94
9%
Black Level *
0.39
0.55
-41%
Contrast
1344
875
-35%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.6
1.1
83%
5.1
23%
2.97
55%
0.9
86%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.2
2.1
83%
11
10%
10.18
17%
2
84%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
9.1
1.3
86%
2
78%
2.5
73%
1.5
84%
Gamma
2.34 94%
2.12 104%
2.22 99%
2.031 108%
2.27 97%
CCT
8987 72%
6442 101%
6589 99%
6533 99%
6548 99%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 13560 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
24.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 9.2 ms hausse
↘ 15.6 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (24.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
48 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 22 ms hausse
↘ 26 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (39.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2203 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1849 Points ∼84% -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (1941 - 2245, n=4)
2148 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (143 - 3222, n=41)
1345 Points ∼61% -39%
OpenCL Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3360 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2241 Points ∼67% -33%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (3133 - 3494, n=4)
3362 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=47)
1789 Points ∼53% -47%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2549 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2852 Points ∼100% +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2347 - 2549, n=4)
2474 Points ∼87% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=59)
1883 Points ∼66% -26%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
707 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
750 Points ∼100% +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (685 - 707, n=4)
696 Points ∼93% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=59)
537 Points ∼72% -24%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5677 Points ∼72%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
6475 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
7881 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼95%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (5677 - 9870, n=9)
7355 Points ∼93%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=330)
4670 Points ∼59%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9813 Points ∼89%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5164 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6826 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼100%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (9547 - 10024, n=9)
9838 Points ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=389)
4721 Points ∼43%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3297 Points ∼94%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1624 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2436 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼100%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (3207 - 3378, n=9)
3303 Points ∼94%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=389)
1425 Points ∼40%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8279 Points ∼92%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7945 Points ∼88% -4%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7387 Points ∼82% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
7177 Points ∼79% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼100% +9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (7567 - 9326, n=10)
8433 Points ∼93% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=414)
5417 Points ∼60% -35%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
10209 Points ∼91%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9825 Points ∼88% -4%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
9458 Points ∼85% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
8626 Points ∼77% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼98% +8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (9728 - 13531, n=10)
11164 Points ∼100% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=578)
5888 Points ∼53% -42%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3406 Points ∼100%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2106 Points ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2708 Points ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points ∼97% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2106 - 3406, n=5)
2793 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=87)
2660 Points ∼78% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4853 Points ∼85%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2232 Points ∼39% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2160 Points ∼38% -55%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points ∼100% +18%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2232 - 4853, n=5)
3738 Points ∼65% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=87)
2655 Points ∼46% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4434 Points ∼90%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2203 Points ∼45% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2262 Points ∼46% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points ∼100% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2203 - 4434, n=5)
3464 Points ∼70% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=87)
2439 Points ∼50% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4917 Points ∼100%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2540 Points ∼52% -48%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3160 Points ∼64% -36%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼76% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2227 - 4917, n=10)
3461 Points ∼70% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=421)
2010 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5157 Points ∼73%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3062 Points ∼43% -41%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1611 Points ∼23% -69%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2438 Points ∼34% -53%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼100% +37%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2747 - 5157, n=10)
3997 Points ∼56% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=421)
1808 Points ∼26% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5102 Points ∼86%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2928 Points ∼50% -43%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1772 Points ∼30% -65%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2568 Points ∼43% -50%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼100% +16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2611 - 5102, n=10)
3823 Points ∼65% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=422)
1684 Points ∼28% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4997 Points ∼100%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2598 Points ∼52% -48%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2771 Points ∼55% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3025 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼76% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2421 - 4997, n=10)
3580 Points ∼72% -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5133, n=450)
1920 Points ∼38% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6350 Points ∼62%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3459 Points ∼34% -46%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2533 Points ∼25% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3635 Points ∼35% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼100% +62%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2536 - 6350, n=10)
4495 Points ∼44% -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=450)
2418 Points ∼23% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5990 Points ∼80%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3222 Points ∼43% -46%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2582 Points ∼35% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3479 Points ∼47% -42%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼100% +24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2525 - 5990, n=10)
4247 Points ∼57% -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=450)
2039 Points ∼27% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4509 Points ∼100%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3685 Points ∼82% -18%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2728 Points ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3215 Points ∼71% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼83% -17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (3380 - 4509, n=10)
3889 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4909, n=501)
1916 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4937 Points ∼78%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4184 Points ∼66% -15%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1482 Points ∼23% -70%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2244 Points ∼35% -55%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% +29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2082 - 4937, n=10)
3960 Points ∼62% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=501)
1503 Points ∼24% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4835 Points ∼88%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4062 Points ∼74% -16%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1651 Points ∼30% -66%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2405 Points ∼44% -50%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼100% +14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2276 - 4835, n=10)
3929 Points ∼71% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=502)
1450 Points ∼26% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4436 Points ∼100%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3557 Points ∼80% -20%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2708 Points ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3211 Points ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼81% -19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (3548 - 4436, n=10)
3942 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4900, n=542)
1782 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6111 Points ∼61%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3292 Points ∼33% -46%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2419 Points ∼24% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3478 Points ∼35% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +63%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2347 - 6111, n=10)
4277 Points ∼43% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=541)
1979 Points ∼20% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5638 Points ∼79%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3347 Points ∼47% -41%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2477 Points ∼35% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3415 Points ∼48% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼100% +27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2567 - 5638, n=10)
4152 Points ∼58% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=544)
1713 Points ∼24% -70%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
23870 Points ∼88%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
22337 Points ∼83% -6%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
18523 Points ∼68% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
19389 Points ∼72% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼94% +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (19993 - 37164, n=10)
27047 Points ∼100% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=701)
14394 Points ∼53% -40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
51362 Points ∼48%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
43622 Points ∼41% -15%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
35401 Points ∼33% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
51091 Points ∼48% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼100% +107%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (42128 - 67956, n=10)
53280 Points ∼50% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=699)
22589 Points ∼21% -56%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
40895 Points ∼66%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
35999 Points ∼58% -12%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
29229 Points ∼47% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
37475 Points ∼60% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼100% +52%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (34035 - 57073, n=10)
43799 Points ∼70% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=699)
18255 Points ∼29% -55%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
137 fps ∼82%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
69 fps ∼41% -50%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
58 fps ∼35% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
84 fps ∼50% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (68 - 138, n=10)
110 fps ∼66% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=714)
38.7 fps ∼23% -72%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
60 fps ∼100%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
56 fps ∼93% -7%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
52 fps ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
59 fps ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (55 - 62, n=10)
58.7 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=723)
28.5 fps ∼48% -52%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
88 fps ∼88%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
41 fps ∼41% -53%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
29 fps ∼29% -67%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
42 fps ∼42% -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100% +14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (40 - 91, n=10)
70 fps ∼70% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=619)
22.4 fps ∼22% -75%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
59 fps ∼98%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
57 fps ∼95% -3%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
27 fps ∼45% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
36 fps ∼60% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (37 - 60, n=10)
54.8 fps ∼91% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=628)
19.7 fps ∼33% -67%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
56 fps ∼81%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
25 fps ∼36% -55%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
20 fps ∼29% -64%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼43% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (25 - 56, n=10)
45.2 fps ∼66% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=484)
18.2 fps ∼26% -67%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
48 fps ∼83%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
24 fps ∼41% -50%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
19 fps ∼33% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
26 fps ∼45% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (24 - 54, n=10)
43.4 fps ∼75% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=486)
17 fps ∼29% -65%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
21 fps ∼88%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
21 fps ∼88% 0%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
4.4 fps ∼18% -79%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps ∼42% -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (19 - 21, n=9)
20.3 fps ∼85% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=212)
9.95 fps ∼41% -53%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
14 fps ∼88%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
14 fps ∼88% 0%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7 fps ∼44% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6.8 fps ∼43% -51%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (13 - 14, n=9)
13.7 fps ∼86% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=211)
6.88 fps ∼43% -51%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
33 fps ∼89%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
31 fps ∼84% -6%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼30% -67%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼43% -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (18 - 33, n=9)
29.8 fps ∼81% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=216)
14.7 fps ∼40% -55%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
37 fps ∼90%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
32 fps ∼78% -14%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼29% -68%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼44% -51%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼100% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (30 - 37, n=9)
33.2 fps ∼81% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=216)
16.4 fps ∼40% -56%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
32 fps ∼76%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
17 fps ∼40% -47%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼26% -66%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼40% -47%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (17 - 33, n=10)
28.8 fps ∼69% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=409)
12.4 fps ∼30% -61%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
28 fps ∼74%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
15 fps ∼39% -46%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
10 fps ∼26% -64%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps ∼39% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (15 - 30, n=10)
24 fps ∼63% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=413)
11.1 fps ∼29% -60%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
322616 Points ∼86%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
285950 Points ∼76% -11%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
153450 Points ∼41% -52%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
202586 Points ∼54% -37%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (268359 - 322616, n=10)
295586 Points ∼79% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=297)
143610 Points ∼38% -55%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
250054 Points ∼97%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
126241 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
159151 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
257246 Points ∼100%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (245662 - 254229, n=9)
250407 Points ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5600 - 293444, n=490)
87858 Points ∼34%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
410820 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
440822 Points ∼100% +7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (410820 - 417287, n=2)
414054 Points ∼94% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (84645 - 534558, n=35)
270267 Points ∼61% -34%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1462 Points ∼100%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1281 Points ∼88% -12%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1229 Points ∼84% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
1117 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼94% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (1239 - 1462, n=10)
1343 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=650)
767 Points ∼52% -48%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7640 Points ∼82%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6681 Points ∼72% -13%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2818 Points ∼30% -63%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3855 Points ∼42% -50%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼100% +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (4963 - 7758, n=10)
6484 Points ∼70% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=650)
2126 Points ∼23% -72%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5116 Points ∼90%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5683 Points ∼100% +11%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
3288 Points ∼58% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3435 Points ∼60% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼71% -21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (5116 - 6283, n=10)
5580 Points ∼98% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=650)
1571 Points ∼28% -69%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8456 Points ∼100%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7639 Points ∼90% -10%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5480 Points ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6484 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼100% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (7597 - 8604, n=10)
8146 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=650)
3061 Points ∼36% -64%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4689 Points ∼100%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4390 Points ∼94% -6%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2811 Points ∼60% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3129 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼98% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (4014 - 4746, n=10)
4446 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=650)
1535 Points ∼33% -67%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.207 Points ∼100%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (48.4 - 60.9, n=6)
53.1 Points ∼93%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)
49.159 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
40.021 Points ∼70%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=118)
36.3 Points ∼63%
Google Pixel 3a
33.563 Points ∼59%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
110.54 Points ∼100% +1%
Huawei Nova 5T (Chrome 74)
109.88 Points ∼99%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (93.2 - 110, n=9)
102 Points ∼92% -7%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)
97.57 Points ∼88% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
77.376 Points ∼70% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=547)
42.7 Points ∼39% -61%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
65.7 runs/min ∼100%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (58.3 - 67.8, n=6)
61.7 runs/min ∼94%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)
58.3 runs/min ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=106)
40 runs/min ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chome 75)
38.9 runs/min ∼59%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei Nova 5T (Chrome 74)
124 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼87% -13%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (86 - 124, n=10)
105 Points ∼85% -15%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)
86 Points ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
77 Points ∼62% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=179)
67.4 Points ∼54% -46%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼100% +10%
Huawei Nova 5T (Chrome 74)
22379 Points ∼91%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (20618 - 23285, n=10)
21733 Points ∼89% -3%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)
21358 Points ∼87% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
16358 Points ∼67% -27%
Google Pixel 3a
10844 Points ∼44% -52%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=708)
6954 Points ∼28% -69%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=733)
10398 ms * ∼100% -405%
Google Pixel 3a
3589.4 ms * ∼35% -74%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)
3098.1 ms * ∼30% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
3027 ms * ∼29% -47%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (1948 - 3098, n=10)
2176 ms * ∼21% -6%
Huawei Nova 5T (Chrome 74)
2059 ms * ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼18% +9%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Huawei Nova 5THonor 20Google Pixel 3aSamsung Galaxy A80Xiaomi Mi 9Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-8%
-37%
-39%
13%
-18%
-68%
Random Write 4KB
247.05
156.98
-36%
99.86
-60%
21.6
-91%
165.32
-33%
89.4 (18.2 - 250, n=43)
-64%
24 (0.14 - 259, n=777)
-90%
Random Read 4KB
146.23
156.7
7%
63.6
-57%
117.5
-20%
149.36
2%
140 (98.9 - 161, n=43)
-4%
49.4 (1.59 - 226, n=777)
-66%
Sequential Write 256KB
186.43
196.41
5%
253.87
36%
190.4
2%
388.27
108%
212 (182 - 503, n=43)
14%
101 (2.99 - 590, n=777)
-46%
Sequential Read 256KB
904.03
829.3
-8%
301.99
-67%
501.5
-45%
666.06
-26%
756 (427 - 912, n=43)
-16%
283 (12.1 - 1781, n=777)
-69%
 32.5 °C33.1 °C34.5 °C 
 33.7 °C32.7 °C35 °C 
 33.9 °C33.8 °C33.2 °C 
Maximum: 35 °C
Moyenne: 33.6 °C
29.8 °C30.7 °C33.7 °C
30.4 °C31.8 °C34.4 °C
29.6 °C31 °C34 °C
Maximum: 34.4 °C
Moyenne: 31.7 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  26.9 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.831.22525.224.93121.625.74024.725.85029.632.16322.521.68025.120.210020.125.112519.927.716020.844.320017.646.225017.651.931517.457.540016.158.750013.96163014.565.980016.166.8100014.567.5125014.470160013.667.5200013.970.6250014.572.9315014.470.5400014.872500014.768.7630014.867800014.962.91000015.158.9125001550.51600015.135.8SPL26.981.1N0.948.2median 14.9median 62.9Delta1.59.536.732.237.133.328.129.927.624.337.538.122.925.323.827.321.324.519.130.218.444.417.946.117.752.417.959.214.658.715.95915.263.716.264.91469.51570.114.76814.470.314.672.814.271.314.770.314.669.914.967.215.163.615.158.414.851.115.136.927.2810.947.9median 15.1median 63.61.411.542.237.231.230.127.229.123.726.43135.722.725.722.823.824.427.220.93720.349.419.151.516.453.91656.217.658.915.262.914.668.515.468.914.872.515.271.915.670.514.87114.670.914.370.414.669.814.763.115.366.915.372.514.973.315.369.315.661.527.382.20.954.3median 15.3median 68.51.27.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Nova 5THonor 20Google Pixel 3a
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Nova 5T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 20 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Google Pixel 3a audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.18 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.87 / 2.34 / 2.4 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 4.56 / 6.97 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Nova 5T
3750 mAh
Honor 20
3750 mAh
Google Pixel 3a
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A80
3700 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
1%
35%
22%
20%
1%
13%
Idle Minimum *
0.87
0.88
-1%
0.61
30%
0.6
31%
0.67
23%
0.802 (0.6 - 0.97, n=10)
8%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=800)
-1%
Idle Average *
2.34
2.27
3%
1.56
33%
1.2
49%
1.26
46%
2.07 (0.9 - 2.6, n=10)
12%
1.741 (0.6 - 6.2, n=799)
26%
Idle Maximum *
2.4
2.34
2%
1.6
33%
1.4
42%
1.29
46%
2.38 (1.83 - 2.77, n=10)
1%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=800)
15%
Load Average *
4.56
4.81
-5%
2.67
41%
5
-10%
3.71
19%
4.87 (3.74 - 6.3, n=10)
-7%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=794)
11%
Load Maximum *
6.97
6.63
5%
4.33
38%
7.1
-2%
9.3
-33%
7.46 (6.15 - 9.85, n=10)
-7%
5.94 (1.2 - 14.2, n=794)
15%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 56min
Huawei Nova 5T
3750 mAh
Honor 20
3750 mAh
Google Pixel 3a
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A80
3700 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
-16%
-21%
-8%
-30%
Reader / Idle
1262
1796
1650
WiFi v1.3
776
654
-16%
612
-21%
713
-8%
546
-30%
Load
208
200
194
H.264
606
902
1008

Points positifs

+ SoC rapide
+ taille du stockage
+ appareil photo avec grand-angle et lentille macro
+ capacités de navigation
+ autonomie

Points négatifs

- stockage non extensible
- connexion USB 2.0
- haut-parleur mono
En test : le Huawei Nova 5T. Modèle de test fourni par notebooksbilliger.de.
En test : le Huawei Nova 5T. Modèle de test fourni par notebooksbilliger.de.

Le Huawei Nova 5T est un smartphone puissant avec un gros stockage et un châssis très élégant. Le fait que l’appareil photo soit surpassé par les meilleurs capteurs est excusable, vu le prix de vente de l’appareil, aux alentours de 429 €. Les images grand-angle et la photo macro sont des fonctionnalités supplémentaires, qui permettent au Nova 5T de marquer des points.

Tout est efficace dans le Huawei Nova 5T : les composants, l’allure, le prix.

À l’exception du coloris récemment ajouté Midsummer Purple, le prix du Nova 5T est déjà passé sous les 400 €, mais reste plus cher que le Honor 20 (environ 330 €). Ceux qui voudraient faire des économies en choisissant le Honor 20 passeront à côté des progrès de communication que notre test a identifiés – il faut considérer l’avantage du prix avec recul.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Huawei Nova 5T - 12/16/2019 v7
Inge Schwabe

Châssis
86%
Clavier
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositif de pointage
98%
Connectivité
47 / 70 → 68%
Poids
90%
Autonomie
90%
Écran
83%
Performances en jeu
48 / 64 → 75%
Performances dans les applications
76 / 86 → 88%
Chauffe
93%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 82%
Appareil photo
63%
Moyenne
78%
84%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Huawei Nova 5T : un clone Honor avec des améliorations
Inge Schwabe, 2019-12-20 (Update: 2019-12-20)