Notebookcheck

Test du MSI Alpha 15 (Ryzen 7 3750H, RX 5500M, FHD, 120 Hz) : Ryzen et Navi plutôt que Intel et Nvidia

Klaus Hinum, J. Simon Leitner (traduit par Prévots), 11/05/2019

Nouvelle donne pour le jeu ? AMD a fait son retour dans les processeurs pros avec sa série Ryzen, non seulement avec les PC de bureau, mais aussi sur les portables. La firme a fait un retour similaire sur le marché des cartes graphiques plus tôt dans l’année, avec ses cartes de bureau Navi, retour qu’elle essaye de répliquer dans les portables, avec ses GPU Navi 14. Nvidia a dominé les cartes graphiques du haut du milieu de gamme pendant longtemps, mais AMD vise à changer cela, et en profite pour proposer plus de choix au consommateur. Lisez ce rapport de test pour découvrir ce que nous pensons de l’un de ces premiers portables tout AMD.

MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
Processeur
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
Carte graphique
AMD Radeon RX 5500M - 4096 Mo, GDDR6
Mémoire
16384 Mo 
, double canal DDR4-2 400, 2 x 8 Go
Écran
15.6 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPP, AU Optronics B156HAN13.0 (AUOD0ED), IPS, 120 Hz, brillant: non
Disque dur
Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, 256 Go 
Connexions
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: jack micro et jack écouteurs, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: SD (XC / HC)
Réseau
Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 27.5 x 357.7 x 248
Batterie
51 Wh Lithium-Ion
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 2 MPix
Annoncées
10/22/2019
Poids
2.3 kg
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Aperçu

NoteDateModèlePoidsÉpaisseurTailleRésolutionBest Price
11/19MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
3750H, Radeon RX 5500M
2.3 kg27.5 mm15.6"1920x1080
80%08/19Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
2.2 kg26.8 mm15.6"1920x1080
79%10/19Dell G3 3590
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
2.5 kg21.6 mm15.6"1920x1080
77%10/19Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
2.1 kg23.9 mm15.6"1920x1080
82%07/19HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
2.3 kg25 mm15.6"1920x1080
83%05/19Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
2.2 kg27 mm15.6"1920x1080
83%08/19Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
2.2 kg26 mm15.6"1920x1080
84%08/19HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
2.4 kg23.4 mm15.6"1920x1080
83%07/19Asus ROG GA502DU
3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
2.1 kg20.4 mm15.6"1920x1080

Comparaison des tailles

365 mm 260 mm 26 mm 2.2 kg363 mm 255 mm 27 mm 2.2 kg360.4 mm 262 mm 26.8 mm 2.2 kg365.5 mm 254 mm 21.6 mm 2.5 kg363 mm 254.6 mm 23.9 mm 2.1 kg357.7 mm 248 mm 27.5 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 256 mm 23.4 mm 2.4 kg
265
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
257
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
282
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
AU Optronics B156HAN13.0 (AUOD0ED)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 282 cd/m² Moyenne: 265.6 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 91 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 266 cd/m²
Contraste: 1506:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.38 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 4.29
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
Gamma: 2.15
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AU Optronics B156HAN13.0 (AUOD0ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Panda LM156LF-GL, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell G3 3590
BOE NV15N3D, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
CMN 156HCA-EAB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
BOE 084D, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
LG Philips LGD05FE, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
6%
-25%
-22%
66%
58%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36.1
30.4 (14, 16.4)
16%
46 (22, 24)
-27%
45.6 (23.6, 22)
-26%
8.8 (4, 4.4)
76%
16.4 (8.4, 8)
55%
Response Time Black / White *
26.4
27.6 (17.6, 10)
-5%
32.4 (18.4, 14)
-23%
30.8 (16.8, 14)
-17%
12 (6.8, 5.2)
55%
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
61%
PWM Frequency
200 (98)
25910 (20)
Screen
-34%
-20%
-15%
-5%
15%
Brightness middle
271
286.2
6%
276.2
2%
275
1%
299
10%
345
27%
Brightness
266
267
0%
261
-2%
253
-5%
290
9%
324
22%
Brightness Distribution
91
84
-8%
86
-5%
83
-9%
89
-2%
86
-5%
Black Level *
0.18
0.33
-83%
0.24
-33%
0.18
-0%
0.29
-61%
0.42
-133%
Contrast
1506
867
-42%
1151
-24%
1528
1%
1031
-32%
821
-45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.38
5.45
-24%
5.56
-27%
5.4
-23%
3.7
16%
1.3
70%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
17.6
18.08
-3%
23.45
-33%
21.3
-21%
7
60%
2.8
84%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.29
4.47
-4%
5.23
-22%
4.4
-3%
2
53%
1.1
74%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.1
5.3
-152%
2.8
-33%
3.7
-76%
4.1
-95%
1.2
43%
Gamma
2.15 102%
2.1 105%
2.37 93%
2.12 104%
2.19 100%
2.31 95%
CCT
6867 95%
7679 85%
6710 97%
6376 102%
7166 91%
6476 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37.6
37.8
40.8
59.3
60.5
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59.1
59
63.6
91.5
94.9
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-14% / -27%
-23% / -21%
-19% / -16%
31% / 8%
37% / 23%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
26.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ ms hausse
↘ ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 52 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (24.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
36.1 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ ms hausse
↘ ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (39.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9266 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800Tooltip
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H: Ø710 (702.9-730.11)
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H: Ø741 (732.32-778.15)
Dell G3 3590 Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø740 (702.49-787.7)
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø707 (700.72-757)
Asus ROG GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H: Ø790 (787.28-796.5)
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø755 (746.1-761.43)
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø748 (730.55-769.02)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H
176 Points ∼100% +20%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H
176 Points ∼100% +20%
Dell G3 3590
Intel Core i5-9300H
172 Points ∼98% +17%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
171 Points ∼97% +16%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
157 Points ∼89% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=529)
157 Points ∼89% +7%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
147 Points ∼84%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
  (135 - 157, n=4)
146 Points ∼83% -1%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
144 Points ∼82% -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=532)
834 Points ∼100% +14%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
805 Points ∼97% +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H
801 (min: 748.64, max: 797.24) Points ∼96% +10%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
799 Points ∼96% +9%
Dell G3 3590
Intel Core i5-9300H
790 Points ∼95% +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
  (730 - 805, n=4)
779 Points ∼93% +7%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
769 Points ∼92% +5%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H
757 Points ∼91% +4%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
730 (min: 702.9, max: 730.11) Points ∼88%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
730 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
85 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
147 Points
Aide
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=226)
5228 Points ∼100% +12%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H
5150 Points ∼99% +10%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4973 Points ∼95% +7%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
4873 Points ∼93% +5%
Dell G3 3590
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNS128G
4798 Points ∼92% +3%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4732 Points ∼91% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
Radeon RX 5500M, 3750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G
4663 Points ∼89%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
  (4322 - 4732, n=4)
4571 Points ∼87% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
4400 Points ∼84% -6%
Asus ROG GA502DU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4322 Points ∼83% -7%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4781 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6613 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5167 points
Aide
Performance Rating
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
 
99.4 pt ∼99%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
97.6 pt ∼98%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
 
88.7 pt ∼89%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
87.3 pt ∼87%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
86.8 pt ∼87%
Average of class Gaming
 
82 pt ∼82%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
79.5 pt ∼80%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
64.8 pt ∼65%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
64.8 pt ∼65%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
64.8 pt ∼65%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
64.5 pt ∼65%
Dell G3 3590
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
63.7 pt ∼64%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
63.5 pt ∼64%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
 
63.5 pt ∼64%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (18610 - 20940, n=17)
19928 Points ∼100% +13%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
19553 Points ∼98% +11%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
17668 Points ∼89%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (17010 - 18493, n=5)
17479 Points ∼88% -1%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
17264 Points ∼87% -2%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
17170 Points ∼86% -3%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
13575 Points ∼68% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=630)
13571 Points ∼68% -23%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
13512 Points ∼68% -24%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
13447 Points ∼67% -24%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
13270 Points ∼67% -25%
Dell G3 3590
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
13228 Points ∼66% -25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (12388 - 13575, n=17)
13210 Points ∼66% -25%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
13125 Points ∼66% -26%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=167)
5724 Points ∼100% +43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (5335 - 5931, n=15)
5620 Points ∼98% +41%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (4867 - 5440, n=5)
5088 Points ∼89% +27%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
4925 Points ∼86% +23%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4867 Points ∼85% +22%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4000 Points ∼70%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
3568 Points ∼62% -11%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
3565 Points ∼62% -11%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
3547 Points ∼62% -11%
Dell G3 3590
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
3519 Points ∼61% -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
3517 Points ∼61% -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (3353 - 3700, n=16)
3508 Points ∼61% -12%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (14186 - 15482, n=17)
14727 Points ∼100% +25%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
14288 Points ∼97% +22%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
13355 Points ∼91% +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (12903 - 13362, n=4)
13202 Points ∼90% +12%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
12903 Points ∼88% +10%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
11754 Points ∼80%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=555)
11462 Points ∼78% -2%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
9536 Points ∼65% -19%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
9534 Points ∼65% -19%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
9428 Points ∼64% -20%
Dell G3 3590
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
9315 Points ∼63% -21%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
9292 Points ∼63% -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (8532 - 9536, n=17)
9264 Points ∼63% -21%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
9221 Points ∼63% -22%
3DMark 06 Standard
26559 points
3DMark 11 Performance
13344 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22490 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9963 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3900 points
Aide
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (51.6 - 60.6, n=14)
55.8 fps ∼100% +28%
Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
55.2 fps ∼99% +27%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
53.1 fps ∼95% +22%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
53.1 (min: 50, max: 58, 99th percentile: 51) fps ∼95% +22%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
52.2 fps ∼94% +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (48.5 - 53.1, n=4)
50.7 fps ∼91% +16%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
48.8 fps ∼87% +12%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
43.6 (min: 36, max: 48) fps ∼78%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
37 fps ∼66% -15%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
36.2 fps ∼65% -17%
Dell G3 3590
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
36.2 fps ∼65% -17%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
35.4 (min: 28) fps ∼63% -19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (33.1 - 38.1, n=16)
35.3 fps ∼63% -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
34.5 (min: 32, max: 37, 99th percentile: 32) fps ∼62% -21%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
34.4 (min: 26) fps ∼62% -21%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (62 - 73, n=6)
66.8 fps ∼100% +26%
Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
62 fps ∼93% +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (49 - 64, n=3)
54 fps ∼81% +2%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
53 (min: 44) fps ∼79%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
49 fps ∼73% -8%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
49 fps ∼73% -8%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
44 (min: 9) fps ∼66% -17%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
43 (min: 35) fps ∼64% -19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (34 - 46, n=6)
42.2 fps ∼63% -20%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
41 fps ∼61% -23%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
125 (min: 106) fps ∼100% +74%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
118.2 (min: 103.4) fps ∼95% +64%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (94.6 - 125, n=5)
112 fps ∼90% +56%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
89.9 fps ∼72% +25%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
82 (min: 70.2) fps ∼66% +14%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
75.7 fps ∼61% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
 
75.7 fps ∼61% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (58.5 - 89.9, n=5)
74.5 fps ∼60% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
73 (min: 65.1) fps ∼58% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
72 (min: 47.9) fps ∼58%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
138 fps ∼100% +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (122 - 144, n=12)
136 fps ∼99% +11%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
126.3 fps ∼92% +3%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
123 fps ∼89%
Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
121.6 fps ∼88% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (102 - 130, n=4)
117 fps ∼85% -5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
107.4 fps ∼78% -13%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
102.3 fps ∼74% -17%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
90.8 fps ∼66% -26%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
87.7 fps ∼64% -29%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
86.1 (min: 3) fps ∼62% -30%
Dell G3 3590
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
85.6 fps ∼62% -30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (68.5 - 90.8, n=12)
82.1 fps ∼59% -33%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
78.7 fps ∼57% -36%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
73.9 fps ∼54% -40%
F1 2019 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (91 - 99, n=4)
93.8 fps ∼100% +47%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
77 fps ∼82% +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (71 - 77, n=2)
74 fps ∼79% +16%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
71 fps ∼76% +11%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
64 (min: 54, max: 70) fps ∼68%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
63 fps ∼67% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (59 - 65, n=5)
61.2 fps ∼65% -4%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
60 fps ∼64% -6%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
59 (min: 53) fps ∼63% -8%
Rage 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (Resolution Scale Off)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (67.9 - 68.8, n=2)
68.4 fps ∼100% +28%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
64.8 fps ∼95% +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (58.2 - 64.8, n=2)
61.5 fps ∼90% +15%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
60 fps ∼88% +12%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
58.2 fps ∼85% +9%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
53.4 (99th percentile: 47.4) fps ∼78%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (45.1 - 60, n=3)
50.5 fps ∼74% -5%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
46.4 fps ∼68% -13%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
45.1 fps ∼66% -16%
Anno 1800 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality (DX11)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
54 fps ∼100% +126%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (31.1 - 54, n=4)
40.1 fps ∼74% +68%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
33.2 fps ∼61% +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (26 - 33.2, n=2)
29.6 fps ∼55% +24%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
26 fps ∼48% +9%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
23.9 (min: 21, max: 26) fps ∼44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (17.4 - 22.7, n=5)
20.1 fps ∼37% -16%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
19.4 (min: 16) fps ∼36% -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
17.35 fps ∼32% -27%
Rocket League - 1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (209 - 221, n=2)
215 fps ∼100% +23%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
175 (min: 132, max: 230) fps ∼81%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
173.7 fps ∼81% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (142 - 174, n=2)
158 fps ∼73% -10%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
141.7 fps ∼66% -19%
Dell G3 3590
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
137.2 fps ∼64% -22%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
136 (min: 112) fps ∼63% -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (96.4 - 150, n=5)
129 fps ∼60% -26%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
127.5 fps ∼59% -27%
GRID 2019 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
 
64.1 fps ∼100% +75%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
58.7 fps ∼92% +60%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
 
58.7 fps ∼92% +60%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (41.3 - 44.4, n=2)
42.9 fps ∼67% +17%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
41.3 fps ∼64% +13%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
36.7 (99th percentile: 14.9) fps ∼57%
Ghost Recon Breakpoint - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
 
55 fps ∼100% +112%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
48 fps ∼87% +85%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
 
48 fps ∼87% +85%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (30 - 37, n=2)
33.5 fps ∼61% +29%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
30 (min: 23) fps ∼55% +15%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
26 fps ∼47%
FIFA 20 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
 
237 fps ∼100% +94%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (137 - 159, n=2)
148 fps ∼62% +21%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
139.3 fps ∼59% +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
 
139 fps ∼59% +14%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
137 fps ∼58% +12%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
122 (99th percentile: 89.3) fps ∼51%
Borderlands 3 - 1920x1080 Badass Overall Quality (DX11)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
 
48.6 fps ∼100% +37%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
41.5 fps ∼85% +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
 
41.5 fps ∼85% +17%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
35.6 fps ∼73%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (29.5 - 30.8, n=3)
30.3 fps ∼62% -15%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
29.5 fps ∼61% -17%
Control - 1920x1080 High Quality Preset (DX11)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
 
52.8 fps ∼100% +54%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
47.1 fps ∼89% +38%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
 
47.1 fps ∼89% +38%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
34.2 (min: 29, max: 39) fps ∼65%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (32.1 - 33.4, n=4)
33 fps ∼63% -4%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
32.1 (min: 27) fps ∼61% -6%
Total War: Three Kingdoms - 1920x1080 Ultra (incl textures)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
 
46.1 fps ∼100% +29%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
41.6 (min: 20, max: 48) fps ∼90% +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (41.1 - 41.6, n=2)
41.4 fps ∼90% +16%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
41.1 (min: 35, max: 48) fps ∼89% +15%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
35.8 (min: 31, max: 42) fps ∼78%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (24.4 - 26.9, n=3)
25.8 fps ∼56% -28%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
24.4 (min: 17) fps ∼53% -32%
The Division 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
 
63 fps ∼100% +50%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
50 fps ∼79% +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (49 - 50, n=2)
49.5 fps ∼79% +18%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
49 fps ∼78% +17%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
42 fps ∼67%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (35 - 43, n=3)
38.3 fps ∼61% -9%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
37 fps ∼59% -12%
Dirt Rally 2.0 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
 
62.3 fps ∼100% +7%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
59.2 fps ∼95% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
58.4 (min: 52, max: 68) fps ∼94%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (57.3 - 59.2, n=2)
58.3 fps ∼94% 0%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
57.3 fps ∼92% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (41.8 - 44.1, n=3)
42.7 fps ∼69% -27%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
41.8 (min: 33) fps ∼67% -28%
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (47 - 59, n=2)
53 fps ∼100% +71%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
44 fps ∼83% +42%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
42 fps ∼79% +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (33 - 44, n=3)
39.7 fps ∼75% +28%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
33 fps ∼62% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (22 - 43, n=5)
31.4 fps ∼59% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
31 (min: 1, max: 54) fps ∼58%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
30 (min: 1) fps ∼57% -3%
05101520253035404550Tooltip
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK Radeon RX 5500M, 3750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G; The Witcher 3: Ø40.9 (39-44)
Bas Moyen Élevé UltraQHD4K
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) 191 137 76.3 fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 201 169 123 fps
GTA V (2015) 93 48.6 20.2 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 165 72 43.6 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 93 86 81 72 53 fps
World of Warships (2015) 93 54.9 fps
Overwatch (2016) 124 109 74 fps
Rocket League (2017) 175 175 72 fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 70 24 fps
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) 41 35 fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 62 59 48 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 59 53 32 15 fps
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 48 43 40 31 fps
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) 67.5 53.9 28.8 fps
Battlefield V (2018) 61 43.7 16.2 fps
Farming Simulator 19 (2018) 70 49.1 32.8 fps
Apex Legends (2019) 72 51.7 28.4 fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 51 47 25 fps
Metro Exodus (2019) 92.3 45.4 38.1 32.2 25 fps
Anthem (2019) 48 (stuttering) 47 (stuttering) 44 (stuttering) 32 (stuttering) fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 58.4 38.1 22.8 fps
The Division 2 (2019) 51 42 fps
Anno 1800 (2019) 60 46.3 23.9 fps
Rage 2 (2019) 67 55.7 53.4 15.4 fps
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 134 69.1 48.7 35.8 19.4 6.9 fps
F1 2019 (2019) 79 74 64 64 49.1 33.3 fps
Control (2019) 119 47.5 34.2 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 76 66 47.2 35.6 23.9 6.7 fps
FIFA 20 (2019) 122 122 96 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 58 53 48 26 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 81 67 36.7 29.9 15.2 fps
Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019) 112 94 81 64 35.4 20.1 fps
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 63 57.7 52.3 45.8 41 14.1 fps

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
31.1 / 34.8 / 35.5 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
43 / 53.6 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.434.23738.737.333.336.934.72531.932.332.132.230.831.63130.83131.931.829.829.13028.528.529.94031.630.227.330.630.828.428.532.25031.8292934.228.929.530.228.86332.430.930.732.230.930.229.329.68030.129.530.529.227.828.425.830.610030.928.827.826.625.824.92531.712529.827.428.525.625.123.825.229.116029.729.128.526.724.624.324.729.420032.63029.626.823.823.523.932.425033.231.530.125.623.421.621.732.931538.535.732.928.624.621.721.138.840040.23936.231.226.120.920.740.650038.336.635.529.523.519.919.839.363039.337.634.530.42419.118.93980039.537.434.631.224.72218.439.6100040.638.135.731.525.622.617.840.8125041.739.136.431.524.218.817.342160042.840.137.533.525.118.217.143.2200043.741.138.334.423.41917.143.8250044.842.34034.922.317.91745.2315042.738.834.42819.417.717.342.5400041.23833.928.719.917.71741.2500041.938.834.830.220.717.51741.963003935.13127.418.617.217.139800036.833.529.32417.317.217.136.81000033.43025.620.117.217.217.233.41250030.426.121.117.817.117.117.130.31600025.32118.617.317.117.117.125.4SPL53.550.747.843.234.731.229.953.7N9.17.564.22.21.51.49.2median 39median 36.6median 33.9median 28.6median 23.5median 19median 17.3median 39Delta4.443.52.42.62.324.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
 40 °C41 °C36 °C 
 41 °C42 °C38 °C 
 29 °C32 °C28 °C 
Maximum: 42 °C
Moyenne: 36.3 °C
29 °C27 °C26 °C
40 °C43 °C45 °C
23 °C27 °C29 °C
Maximum: 45 °C
Moyenne: 32.1 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  41 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.2 °C / -5.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.336.941.82531.63133.53128.528.530.64028.428.533.65029.530.231.96330.229.333.18028.425.83410024.9253912523.825.245.316024.324.747.220023.523.95025021.621.750.231521.721.159.240020.920.76550019.919.862.463019.118.973.48002218.480.5100022.617.884.1125018.817.379.9160018.217.180.820001917.180.9250017.91774.9315017.717.375.3400017.71779.1500017.51771.9630017.217.174.6800017.217.176.51000017.217.279.71250017.117.175.31600017.117.174.5SPL31.229.990.6N1.51.485.6median 19median 17.3median 74.6Delta2.3210.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI Alpha 15 A3DDKApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.18 / 0.91 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 11.7 / 15.7 / 22.4 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 70.7 / 191 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
3750H, Radeon RX 5500M, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell G3 3590
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNS128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus ROG GA502DU
3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), KBG30ZMS128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
32%
18%
35%
11%
43%
36%
34%
38%
Idle Minimum *
11.7
7
40%
6.2
47%
5
57%
7.4
37%
3.8
68%
4.04
65%
4
66%
3.4
71%
Idle Average *
15.7
9.9
37%
8.4
46%
7
55%
8.6
45%
6.6
58%
7.2
54%
7
55%
7.6
52%
Idle Maximum *
22.4
12
46%
27.7
-24%
11
51%
39.1
-75%
8.9
60%
11.4
49%
12
46%
10.2
54%
Load Average *
70.7
68.4
3%
91
-29%
89
-26%
65.9
7%
78.4
-11%
80.8
-14%
95
-34%
73
-3%
Load Maximum *
191
130.9
31%
131.5
31%
132
31%
141.3
26%
124
35%
144.5
24%
135
29%
140.5
26%
Witcher 3 ultra *
148
94.9
36%
94.4
36%
90
39%
106.9
28%
82
45%
93.6
37%
86
42%
107
28%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Verdict initial

En test : le MSI Alpha 15 avec AMD Radeon RX 5500M qui apporte un air nouveau aux portables de jeu du milieu de gamme.
En test : le MSI Alpha 15 avec AMD Radeon RX 5500M qui apporte un air nouveau aux portables de jeu du milieu de gamme.

Alors que MSI n’a pas essayé d’atteindre la première place avec l’Alpha 15, il a développé une machine qui secoue indéniablement le marché du milieu de gamme, qu’Intel et Nvidia ont dominé jusqu’à aujourd’hui. En bref, l’Alpha 15 est le premier pas sur un marché sur lequel AMD devrait monter en puissance.

Le composant-phare de l’Alpha 15 est son GPU Radeon RX 5500M, basé sur l’architecture Navi d’AMD. La carte graphique, fabriquée en 7 nm, se situe sur le papier entre les GeForce GTX 1650 et GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, ce que nos tests avec ce modèle de préproduction confirment. Il faut cependant noter que la disparité des résultats est pour l’instant élevée – la RX 5500M ne dépasse pas la GTX 1650 dans certains jeux, tandis qu’elle atteint la GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q dans d’autres. Elle se situe cependant entre les deux la plupart du temps.

Le MSI Alpha 15 peut concurrencer les portables équipés d’un Core i5-9300H et d’une GeForce 1660 Ti Max-Q dans certains jeux, avec son processeur Ryzen 7 3750H et sa nouvelle carte graphique RX 5500M.

Que l’on parle d’un succès pour AMD ou MSI dépendra du prix de lancement de l’Alpha 15. Des informations non officielles laissent entendre que l’appareil sera vendu entre 999 et 1 099 € pour des versions 120 et 144 Hz, ce qui place l’Alpha 15 bien au-delà des appareils Core i5-9300H et GTX 1650, qui coûtent généralement bien moins de 1 000 $. Cependant, les portables GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q coûtent souvent plus de 1 000 $, ce qui met mieux en avant la RX 5500M. Nous imaginons que le choix entre ces trois cartes graphiques dépendra également des autres fonctionnalités que proposeront les portables qui en seront équipés.

Dans l’ensemble, l’Alpha 15 donne une bonne impression de la Radeon RX 5500M, et de l’architecture RDNA sur portables. Il semblerait que le choix entre AMD et Nvidia sera à nouveau un véritable choix, même si la capacité d’AMD à pénétrer le marché du portable de jeu haut de gamme est encore à confirmer. Ce qui est certain, c’est que des cartes graphiques pour portables plus puissantes que la RX 5500M sont sur les rails.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du MSI Alpha 15 (Ryzen 7 3750H, RX 5500M, FHD, 120 Hz) : Ryzen et Navi plutôt que Intel et Nvidia
Klaus Hinum, J. Simon Leitner, 2019-11- 5 (Update: 2019-11- 5)