Notebookcheck

Test du Motorola Moto G8 Power : bonne autonomie et bons appareils photo

Autonomie au sommet. Avec le Moto G8 Power, Motorola redéfinit le concept du smartphone bon marché ayant une bonne autonomie. Non seulement sa partie matérielle est adaptée à un usage classique au quotidien, mais ses photos sont aussi étonnamment bonnes. Lisez ce rapport de test pour voir quelles qualités le Moto G8 Power peut fournir, en plus de son autonomie et de ses photos.
Mike Wobker, Andrea Grüblinger (traduit par Prévots),
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Moto G8 Gamme)
Processeur
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260
Carte graphique
Mémoire
4096 Mo 
Écran
6.4 pouces 19:9, 2300 x 1080 pixel 397 PPP, capacitif, IPS, brillant: oui, 60 Hz
Disque dur
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 Go 
, 51 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, USB C, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD (jusqu'à 512 Go, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, gyroscope, capteur de proximité
Réseau
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5, 2G GSM (2/3/5/8), 3G, Dual SIM, LTE
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 10 x 156 x 76
Batterie
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Android 10
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 16 MPix 16 MP (ƒ/1,7, 1,12 µm) + 2 MP (ƒ/2.2, 1,75 µm) macro + 8 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,12 µm) ultra-grand-angle, 8 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,12 µm) téléobjectif zoom optique x2
Appareil photo secondaire: 16 MPix ƒ/2,0, 1 µm
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: 2 haut-parleurs, Clavier: virtuel, adaptateur secteur USB, câble USB C, outil pour carte SIM, coque de protection, 24 Mois Garantie, DAS (tête) : 0,914 W/kg, DAS (corps) : 1,79 W/kg, vitesses LTE : 400 MBit/s (réception), 75 MBit/s (envoi)
Poids
197 g, Alimentation: 80 g
Prix
230 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Appareils du comparatif

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Drive
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
78 %
04/20
Motorola Moto G8 Power
SD 665, Adreno 610
197 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.4"2300x1080
81 %
03/20
Sharp Aquos V
SD 835, Adreno 540
173 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash5.9"2160x1080
78 %
01/20
Nokia 6.2
SD 636, Adreno 509
180 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
78 %
09/19
Xiaomi Mi A3
SD 665, Adreno 610
173.8 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.09"1560x720
80 %
01/20
TCL Plex
SD 675, Adreno 612
192 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.53"2340x1080
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sharp Aquos V
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
468 (406min - 517max) MBit/s ∼100% +728%
TCL Plex
Adreno 612, SD 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
359 (330min - 369max) MBit/s ∼77% +535%
Nokia 6.2
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
325 (280min - 342max) MBit/s ∼69% +475%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=598)
280 MBit/s ∼60% +396%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
158 (18min - 227max) MBit/s ∼34% +180%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
56.5 (11min - 75max) MBit/s ∼12%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sharp Aquos V
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
409 (342min - 464max) MBit/s ∼100% +811%
TCL Plex
Adreno 612, SD 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
287 (250min - 308max) MBit/s ∼70% +539%
Nokia 6.2
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
284 (240min - 307max) MBit/s ∼69% +533%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=598)
267 MBit/s ∼65% +495%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
172 (2min - 282max) MBit/s ∼42% +283%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.9 (2min - 75max) MBit/s ∼11%
01020304050607080Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø56.4 (11-75)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø44.8 (2-75)
GPS Motorola Moto G8 Power : vue générale.
GPS Motorola Moto G8 Power : vue générale.
GPS Motorola Moto G8 Power : pont.
GPS Motorola Moto G8 Power : pont.
GPS Motorola Moto G8 Power - Traversée.
GPS Motorola Moto G8 Power - Traversée.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : pont.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : pont.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 - Traversée.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 - Traversée.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker
27.2 ∆E
47.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
41.2 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
56.4 ∆E
55.3 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
63 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
39.5 ∆E
55.9 ∆E
59.9 ∆E
45.8 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G8 Power: 40.39 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 63.03 ∆E
ColorChecker
11.8 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
12 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G8 Power: 7.58 ∆E min: 1.73 - max: 12.84 ∆E
Motorola Moto G8 Power - Mire de test.
Mire de test.
Motorola Moto G8 Power - Mire de test à 1 lux.
490
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 495 cd/m² Moyenne: 483.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.5 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 93 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 462 cd/m²
Contraste: 711:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.65 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6
92.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.303
Motorola Moto G8 Power
IPS, 2300x1080, 6.4
Sharp Aquos V
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9
Nokia 6.2
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Xiaomi Mi A3
AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.09
TCL Plex
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53
Screen
15%
25%
-15%
21%
Brightness middle
462
507
10%
611
32%
348
-25%
432
-6%
Brightness
483
486
1%
582
20%
355
-27%
418
-13%
Brightness Distribution
93
91
-2%
91
-2%
91
-2%
93
0%
Black Level *
0.65
0.55
15%
0.4
38%
0.43
34%
Contrast
711
922
30%
1528
115%
1005
41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.7
4.43
22%
5.2
9%
5.86
-3%
3.4
40%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.9
7.13
20%
10.2
-15%
15.6
-75%
6
33%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.5
5
23%
6.1
6%
3.6
45%
3.8
42%
Gamma
2.303 96%
2.18 101%
2.21 100%
2.232 99%
2.14 103%
CCT
8073 81%
7739 84%
8100 80%
7051 92%
6151 106%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 714.3 Hz
≤ 15 Niveau de luminosité en cd/m²

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 714.3 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 15 cd/m² . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 714.3 Hz est élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.

Le scintillement ne se produit qu'avec un faible niveau de luminosité. Le symptôme devrait être imperceptible en pratique. La lecture à basse luminosité peut entraîner une fatigue oculaire.

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 17567 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
26 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 11 ms hausse
↘ 15 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (24.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
46 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 21 ms hausse
↘ 25 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (38.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
464 Points ∼28%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
369 Points ∼23% -20%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
487 Points ∼30% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (432 - 483, n=5)
455 Points ∼28% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=66)
1633 Points ∼100% +252%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
368 Points ∼19%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
1908 Points ∼100% +418%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
351 Points ∼18% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (363 - 368, n=5)
366 Points ∼19% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=61)
1759 Points ∼92% +378%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1385 Points ∼72%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
1669 Points ∼86% +21%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
924 Points ∼48% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1256 - 1405, n=7)
1346 Points ∼70% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=118)
1936 Points ∼100% +40%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
311 Points ∼57%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
386 Points ∼70% +24%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
486 Points ∼88% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (309 - 313, n=7)
311 Points ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=118)
550 Points ∼100% +77%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6963 Points ∼88%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
7510 Points ∼94% +8%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5965 Points ∼75% -14%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6396 Points ∼80% -8%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
7950 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6189 - 11432, n=11)
7048 Points ∼89% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=521)
5952 Points ∼75% -15%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8804 Points ∼89%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
9927 Points ∼100% +13%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6696 Points ∼67% -24%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7984 Points ∼80% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7437 - 9051, n=10)
8163 Points ∼82% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=679)
6528 Points ∼66% -26%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2354 Points ∼88%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
2559 Points ∼96% +9%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2175 Points ∼82% -8%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2300 Points ∼86% -2%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1952 Points ∼73% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2185 - 2444, n=11)
2284 Points ∼86% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=173)
2662 Points ∼100% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
904 Points ∼25%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3580 Points ∼100% +296%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
789 Points ∼22% -13%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
908 Points ∼25% 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
916 Points ∼26% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (897 - 995, n=11)
933 Points ∼26% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=173)
2989 Points ∼83% +231%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1047 Points ∼32%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3288 Points ∼100% +214%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
926 Points ∼28% -12%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1049 Points ∼32% 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1038 Points ∼32% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1035 - 1140, n=11)
1074 Points ∼33% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6754, n=173)
2686 Points ∼82% +157%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2488 Points ∼81%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3062 Points ∼100% +23%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2337 Points ∼76% -6%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2387 Points ∼78% -4%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1684 Points ∼55% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2154 - 2541, n=10)
2378 Points ∼78% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=524)
2219 Points ∼72% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
988 Points ∼22%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
4468 Points ∼100% +352%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
855 Points ∼19% -13%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
987 Points ∼22% 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
955 Points ∼21% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (980 - 999, n=10)
988 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 10043, n=524)
2134 Points ∼48% +116%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1151 Points ∼28%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
4054 Points ∼100% +252%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
977 Points ∼24% -15%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1135 Points ∼28% -1%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1057 Points ∼26% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1097 - 1151, n=10)
1135 Points ∼28% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8269, n=525)
1993 Points ∼49% +73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2493 Points ∼82%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3047 Points ∼100% +22%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2288 Points ∼75% -8%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2343 Points ∼77% -6%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1657 Points ∼54% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2199 - 2503, n=11)
2365 Points ∼78% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=556)
2135 Points ∼70% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1678 Points ∼26%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
6417 Points ∼100% +282%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1389 Points ∼22% -17%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1674 Points ∼26% 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1611 Points ∼25% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1650 - 1692, n=11)
1668 Points ∼26% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=556)
2875 Points ∼45% +71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1809 Points ∼35%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
5151 Points ∼100% +185%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1568 Points ∼30% -13%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1787 Points ∼35% -1%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1621 Points ∼31% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1754 - 1810, n=11)
1786 Points ∼35% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=556)
2417 Points ∼47% +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2493 Points ∼83%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3018 Points ∼100% +21%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2335 Points ∼77% -6%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2477 Points ∼82% -1%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1724 Points ∼57% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2212 - 2580, n=11)
2417 Points ∼80% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=605)
2100 Points ∼70% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
984 Points ∼24%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
4031 Points ∼100% +310%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
809 Points ∼20% -18%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
931 Points ∼23% -5%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
829 Points ∼21% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (927 - 999, n=11)
968 Points ∼24% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 9008, n=605)
1801 Points ∼45% +83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1137 Points ∼30%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3751 Points ∼100% +230%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
945 Points ∼25% -17%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1081 Points ∼29% -5%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
937 Points ∼25% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1076 - 1152, n=11)
1118 Points ∼30% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7400, n=606)
1716 Points ∼46% +51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2507 Points ∼83%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3009 Points ∼100% +20%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2339 Points ∼78% -7%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2471 Points ∼82% -1%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1708 Points ∼57% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2282 - 2596, n=11)
2429 Points ∼81% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=648)
1970 Points ∼65% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1626 Points ∼26%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
6208 Points ∼100% +282%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1322 Points ∼21% -19%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1651 Points ∼27% +2%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1594 Points ∼26% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1564 - 1663, n=11)
1622 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12611, n=647)
2384 Points ∼38% +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1764 Points ∼35%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
5022 Points ∼100% +185%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1467 Points ∼29% -17%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1782 Points ∼35% +1%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1618 Points ∼32% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1675 - 1795, n=11)
1750 Points ∼35% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9549, n=650)
2048 Points ∼41% +16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24652 Points ∼100%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15876 Points ∼64% -36%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19552 Points ∼79% -21%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
15461 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (17865 - 24652, n=10)
20916 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=792)
15527 Points ∼63% -37%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25161 Points ∼94%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
21067 Points ∼78% -16%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25219 Points ∼94% 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
26320 Points ∼98% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15403 - 25351, n=10)
23960 Points ∼89% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=790)
26885 Points ∼100% +7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25046 Points ∼100%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19635 Points ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23693 Points ∼95% -5%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
22767 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (22445 - 25046, n=10)
23870 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=790)
20998 Points ∼84% -16%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼79%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼77% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼79% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (35 - 36, n=9)
35.8 fps ∼79% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=794)
45.4 fps ∼100% +26%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
33 fps ∼63%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
32 fps ∼62% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
52 fps ∼100% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (30 - 52, n=9)
35.8 fps ∼69% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=803)
31.4 fps ∼60% -5%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼71%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼60% -16%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps ∼75% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (19 - 20, n=9)
19.2 fps ∼72% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=699)
26.8 fps ∼100% +41%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18 fps ∼53%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼44% -17%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps ∼100% +89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15 - 34, n=9)
21.1 fps ∼62% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=707)
22.6 fps ∼66% +26%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼60%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼29% -52%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼60% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (13 - 13, n=9)
13 fps ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=562)
21.6 fps ∼100% +66%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
12 fps ∼46%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.7 fps ∼22% -52%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
26 fps ∼100% +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (10 - 27, n=9)
15 fps ∼58% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=564)
19.6 fps ∼75% +63%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.5 fps ∼30%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
15 fps ∼100% +233%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.3 fps ∼15% -49%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9.1 fps ∼61% +102%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
4.9 fps ∼33% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (3.9 - 9.1, n=11)
5.65 fps ∼38% +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=317)
11.3 fps ∼75% +151%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼29%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
9.7 fps ∼100% +246%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
3.5 fps ∼36% +25%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼29% 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
3 fps ∼31% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2.7 - 2.8, n=11)
2.77 fps ∼29% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=315)
8.06 fps ∼83% +188%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.6 fps ∼32%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
24 fps ∼100% +216%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps ∼23% -29%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼63% +97%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
8.3 fps ∼35% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.2 - 15, n=11)
9.31 fps ∼39% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=321)
16.9 fps ∼70% +122%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.1 fps ∼31%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
26 fps ∼100% +221%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼23% -26%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.4 fps ∼32% +4%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
9.1 fps ∼35% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7.8 - 8.4, n=11)
8.13 fps ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=320)
19.4 fps ∼75% +140%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼49%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼43% -11%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼49% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.9 - 7.2, n=9)
7.06 fps ∼49% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=487)
14.5 fps ∼100% +104%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.6 fps ∼51%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps ∼42% -18%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼100% +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (5.7 - 13, n=9)
7.86 fps ∼60% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=491)
12.8 fps ∼98% +94%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
168901 Points ∼53%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
145220 Points ∼46% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (167305 - 181432, n=9)
171951 Points ∼54% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=116)
318041 Points ∼100% +88%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
935 Points ∼67%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
876 Points ∼63% -6%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1400 Points ∼100% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (926 - 1400, n=9)
1101 Points ∼79% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=734)
825 Points ∼59% -12%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1931 Points ∼76%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1632 Points ∼64% -15%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1886 Points ∼75% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1881 - 1932, n=9)
1906 Points ∼75% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=734)
2531 Points ∼100% +31%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2864 Points ∼90%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2024 Points ∼64% -29%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
3174 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1804 - 3174, n=9)
2681 Points ∼84% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=734)
1886 Points ∼59% -34%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4848 Points ∼95%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4498 Points ∼88% -7%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5089 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (4391 - 5089, n=9)
4825 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=734)
3486 Points ∼69% -28%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2238 Points ∼88%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1907 Points ∼75% -15%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2556 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2001 - 2556, n=9)
2271 Points ∼89% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=734)
1781 Points ∼70% -20%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
51.046 Points ∼100% +6%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
48.109 Points ∼94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8)
47.5 Points ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=623)
47.4 Points ∼93% -1%
Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79)
44.435 Points ∼87% -8%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=260)
69.7 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
58 Points ∼83% +4%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
56 Points ∼80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9)
50.9 Points ∼73% -9%
Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79)
46 Points ∼66% -18%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
9260 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9)
8901 Points ∼96% +3%
Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79)
8756 Points ∼95% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
8675 Points ∼94%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=791)
7916 Points ∼85% -9%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=817)
9727 ms * ∼100% -109%
Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79)
5065.7 ms * ∼52% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9)
4783 ms * ∼49% -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
4663.6 ms * ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
4583.8 ms * ∼47% +2%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Motorola Moto G8 PowerSharp Aquos VNokia 6.2Xiaomi Mi A3TCL PlexAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
40%
-4%
29%
38%
-11%
-14%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
49.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
54.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
61.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
24%
50.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
56.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
57.9 (11.2 - 74.7, n=128)
16%
51.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=536)
3%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
69.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
83.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
20%
67.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
74.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
77 (21.1 - 87.2, n=128)
11%
69.1 (8.1 - 96.5, n=536)
0%
Random Write 4KB
132.63
16.8
-87%
14.88
-89%
117.4
-11%
130.11
-2%
28 (3.4 - 147, n=146)
-79%
36 (0.14 - 319, n=888)
-73%
Random Read 4KB
57.7
157.2
172%
78.83
37%
126.9
120%
130.75
127%
56.5 (11.4 - 149, n=146)
-2%
59.4 (1.59 - 324, n=888)
3%
Sequential Write 256KB
181.88
206.2
13%
158.54
-13%
184
1%
199.74
10%
175 (40 - 254, n=146)
-4%
128 (2.99 - 911, n=888)
-30%
Sequential Read 256KB
300.9
650.9
116%
296.76
-1%
502.2
67%
522.31
74%
274 (95.6 - 704, n=146)
-9%
342 (12.1 - 1802, n=888)
14%
 41.3 °C38.3 °C37.4 °C 
 41.5 °C38.3 °C37.6 °C 
 40 °C37.8 °C37.4 °C 
Maximum: 41.5 °C
Moyenne: 38.8 °C
36.5 °C38.2 °C41.6 °C
36.2 °C38.4 °C41.1 °C
36 °C38.2 °C40.2 °C
Maximum: 41.6 °C
Moyenne: 38.5 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  37.9 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated); Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.247.52543.745.23134.836.94037.640.75039.542.16336.636.38029.130.110028.429.112530.533.916024.742.320022.851.625021.955.431521.559.340019.962.150020.767.763019.271.180018.772.410002275.5125018.274.3160017.873.3200017.770.2250017.872315017.676400017.877.4500017.772.2630018.167.5800018.359.21000018.767.9125001972.61600019.464SPL66.13185.1N191.662.4median 19median 67.9Delta28.429.832.825.224.321.623.124.722.629.631.822.519.825.120.620.120.619.92220.830.217.631.817.638.917.445.216.151.813.957.714.559.616.167.314.572.414.470.613.668.613.972.814.576.114.475.214.871.414.77514.869.214.963.315.1611550.615.144.326.983.90.952.3median 14.9median 611.514.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G8 PowerNokia 6.2
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G8 Power audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Nokia 6.2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.1 / 0.4 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.3 / 1.6 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 3.2 / 7.1 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto G8 Power
5000 mAh
Nokia 6.2
3500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh
TCL Plex
3820 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-22%
-37%
-21%
-27%
-15%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.72
20%
0.8
11%
0.73
19%
1.036 (0.62 - 1.7, n=10)
-15%
0.891 (0.2 - 3.4, n=895)
1%
Idle Average *
1.3
2.22
-71%
2
-54%
2.17
-67%
1.942 (1.3 - 2.3, n=10)
-49%
1.757 (0.6 - 6.2, n=894)
-35%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
2.23
-39%
3.3
-106%
2.23
-39%
2.43 (1.6 - 3.5, n=10)
-52%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=895)
-28%
Load Average *
3.2
3.98
-24%
4.1
-28%
4.56
-43%
3.88 (3.2 - 4.7, n=10)
-21%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=889)
-29%
Load Maximum *
7.1
6.86
3%
7.7
-8%
5.22
26%
6.82 (6.09 - 7.7, n=10)
4%
6.11 (1.2 - 14.2, n=889)
14%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16h 42min
Motorola Moto G8 Power
5000 mAh
Sharp Aquos V
3160 mAh
Nokia 6.2
3500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh
TCL Plex
3820 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3
1002
718
-28%
611
-39%
985
-2%
616
-39%

Points positifs

+ autonomie
+ appareils photo
+ robuste
+ Android presque pur

Points négatifs

- Wifi
- contraste

Verdict

En test : le Motorola Moto G8 Power. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Motorola Allemagne.
En test : le Motorola Moto G8 Power. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Motorola Allemagne.

Le Moto G8 Power garantit avant tout une bonne autonomie aux utilisateurs. L’appareil ne peut être critiqué sur ce sujet, puisqu’il a tenu plus de 16h dans nos tests réalistes Wifi. Cependant, le Moto G8 Power possède d’autres qualités. Ses appareils photo sont étonnamment bons, tout comme son OS Android presque pur. Le Moto G8 Power est bien équipé pour un appareil à ce prix.

Le Motorola Moto G8 Power convainc grâce à une excellente autonomie.

Si l’appareil est bien construit, sa grosse batterie le rend plutôt épais. L’appareil est également un peu en retrait en ce qui concerne le Wifi. La norme Wifi 4 qui l’équipe suffira pour la plupart des utilisateurs, mais le Moto G8 Power n’en demeure pas moins dépassé par la concurrence à cet égard. On peut dire que le Motorola Moto G8 Power est un appareil efficace et abordable, mais ses défauts pourraient gêner certains utilisateurs.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Motorola Moto G8 Power - 03/21/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Châssis
80%
Clavier
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositif de pointage
95%
Connectivité
41 / 70 → 59%
Poids
88%
Autonomie
91%
Écran
83%
Performances en jeu
13 / 64 → 21%
Performances dans les applications
59 / 86 → 68%
Chauffe
90%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 84%
Appareil photo
59%
Moyenne
72%
78%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Motorola Moto G8 Power : bonne autonomie et bons appareils photo
Mike Wobker, 2020-04-16 (Update: 2020-04-16)
Alex Alderson
Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - News Editor - @aldersonaj