Notebookcheck

Test du Motorola Moto G8 : smartphone à 200 € avec appareil photo polyvalent

Milieu de gamme basique. La série Moto G de Motorola est depuis plusieurs années composée de smartphones fiables du milieu de gamme. Le Moto G8 est moins cher que son prédécesseur, tout en ayant pour la première fois un zoom. Séduisant, n'est-ce pas ?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduit par Prévots), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Smartphone ARM Android
Motorola Moto G8 (Moto G8 Gamme)
Processeur
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260
Carte graphique
Qualcomm Adreno 610
Mémoire
4096 Mo 
Écran
6.40 pouces 19.5:9, 1560 x 720 pixel 268 PPP, capacitif, IPS, brillant: oui, 60 Hz
Disque dur
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 Go 
, 50 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD jusqu'à 512 Go, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, gyroscope, capteur de proximité
Réseau
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850 / ​900 / ​1 800 / ​1 900), 3G (B1 / ​B2 / ​B4 / ​B5 / ​B8), 4G (B1 / ​B2 / ​B3 / ​B4 / ​B5 / ​B7 / ​B8 / ​B20 / ​B38 / ​B40 / ​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 9 x 161.3 x 75.8
Batterie
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Android 10
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 16 MPix f/​1,7, autofocus à détection de phase, autofocus laser, flash LED, vidéos à 2160p / ​30 FPS (appareil photo 1) ; 8,0 MP, f/​2,2, lentille grand-angle (appareil photo 2) ; 5 0 MP, f/​2,2, macro (appareil photo 3)
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix f/​2,0, vidéos à 1080p / ​30 FPS
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono au-dessous, Clavier: virtuel, chargeur, câble USB, coque silicone, outil pour carte SIM, 24 Mois Garantie, LTE Cat 13 / ​5 (400 Mbit/s / ​75Mbit/s) ; DAS (tête) : 0,62 W/kg, DAS (corps) : 1,68 W/kg, fanless
Poids
188 g, Alimentation: 68 g
Prix
199 euros
Liens
Motorola Page d'accueil
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Test Group

Note
ratingversion
Date
Modèle
Poids
Drive
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
77 %7
06/20
Motorola Moto G8
SD 665, Adreno 610		188 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.40"1560x720
85 %6
03/19
Motorola Moto G7
SD 632, Adreno 506		172 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.20"2270x1080
76 %7
02/20
Xiaomi Redmi 8
SD 439, Adreno 505		188 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.22"1520x720
79 %7
12/19
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2		166 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.40"1560x720
76 %7
11/19
Honor 9X
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4		197 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.59"2340x1080

Comparaison des tailles

❌
163.5 mm 77.3 mm 8.8 mm 197 g161.3 mm 75.8 mm 9 mm 188 g158.5 mm 74.7 mm 7.8 mm 166 g156.5 mm 75.4 mm 9.4 mm 188 g157 mm 75.3 mm 8 mm 172 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=657)
295 MBit/s ∼100% +442%
Honor 9X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
170 (156min - 179max) MBit/s ∼58% +213%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash
122 (119min - 123max) MBit/s ∼41% +124%
Motorola Moto G7
Adreno 506, SD 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash
112 (94min - 118max) MBit/s ∼38% +106%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Adreno 505, SD 439, 64 GB eMMC Flash
56.2 (47min - 58max) MBit/s ∼19% +3%
Motorola Moto G8
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
54.4 (38min - 57max) MBit/s ∼18%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=657)
281 MBit/s ∼100% +404%
Honor 9X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
142 (118min - 160max) MBit/s ∼51% +154%
Motorola Moto G7
Adreno 506, SD 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash
112 (107min - 117max) MBit/s ∼40% +101%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash
100 (92min - 105max) MBit/s ∼36% +79%
Motorola Moto G8
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55.8 (40min - 67max) MBit/s ∼20%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Adreno 505, SD 439, 64 GB eMMC Flash
50.2 (24min - 56max) MBit/s ∼18% -10%
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø54 (38-57)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55.9 (40-67)
GPS Motorola Moto G8 : vue générale.
GPS Motorola Moto G8 : vue générale.
GPS Motorola Moto G8 : virages.
GPS Motorola Moto G8 : virages.
GPS Motorola Moto G8 : pont.
GPS Motorola Moto G8 : pont.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : virages.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : virages.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : pont.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : pont.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker
28.1 ∆E
49.8 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
57.7 ∆E
49.3 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
59 ∆E
58.2 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
45 ∆E
33 ∆E
68.4 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
41.5 ∆E
62.1 ∆E
64.6 ∆E
48.5 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G8: 42.34 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 68.35 ∆E
ColorChecker
12.9 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
13 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
14 ∆E
10 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G8: 10.05 ∆E min: 2.25 - max: 16.73 ∆E
416
cd/m²		430
cd/m²		461
cd/m²
420
cd/m²		504
cd/m²		463
cd/m²
421
cd/m²		487
cd/m²		462
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 504 cd/m² Moyenne: 451.6 cd/m² Minimum: 4.48 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 83 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 504 cd/m²
Contraste: 1800:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.84 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
92.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.235
Motorola Moto G8
IPS, 1560x720, 6.40		Motorola Moto G7
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.20		Xiaomi Redmi 8
IPS LCD, 1520x720, 6.22		Samsung Galaxy A30s
Super AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.40		Honor 9X
LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.59
Screen
-35%
15%
24%
-50%
Brightness middle
504
471
-7%
554
10%
488
-3%
494
-2%
Brightness
452
453
0%
516
14%
489
8%
483
7%
Brightness Distribution
83
94
13%
85
2%
93
12%
94
13%
Black Level *
0.28
0.5
-79%
0.24
14%
0.51
-82%
Contrast
1800
942
-48%
2308
28%
969
-46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.84
5.5
-43%
2.6
32%
1.7
56%
5.74
-49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.1
7.95
-30%
4.9
20%
3.3
46%
10.26
-68%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.7
5
-85%
2.7
-0%
2
26%
7.3
-170%
Gamma
2.235 98%
2.326 95%
2.17 101%
2.1 105%
2.086 105%
CCT
7125 91%
7654 85%
6814 95%
6506 100%
8572 76%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ
Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 625 Hz

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 625 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) .

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 625 Hz est élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9700 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ
Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
   ↔    Temps de réponse noir à blanc
28 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 11 ms hausse
↘ 17 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 60 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (24.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
   ↔    Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
46 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 23 ms hausse
↘ 23 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (38.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5.3 | Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v8 | BaseMark OS II
Geekbench 5.3
Vulkan Score 5.1 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
447 Points ∼28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (432 - 483, n=5)
455 Points ∼28% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=67)
1615 Points ∼100% +261%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
363 Points ∼21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (363 - 368, n=5)
366 Points ∼21% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=62)
1737 Points ∼100% +379%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1280 Points ∼66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1256 - 1421, n=8)
1356 Points ∼70% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=182)
1939 Points ∼100% +51%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
309 Points ∼55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (309 - 314, n=8)
311 Points ∼56% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (63 - 1604, n=182)
560 Points ∼100% +81%
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5134 Points ∼95%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
4765 Points ∼88% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (5134 - 5663, n=3)
5388 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 14895, n=434)
5074 Points ∼94% -1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1495 Points ∼96%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1256 Points ∼81% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1495 - 1536, n=3)
1509 Points ∼97% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 5099, n=434)
1551 Points ∼100% +4%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6969 Points ∼99%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
6038 Points ∼86% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
4664 Points ∼66% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5474 Points ∼78% -21%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7018 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6189 - 11432, n=12)
6985 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=580)
6148 Points ∼88% -12%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9051 Points ∼95%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
7187 Points ∼76% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
6076 Points ∼64% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
6628 Points ∼70% -27%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
9509 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7437 - 9051, n=10)
8163 Points ∼86% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=728)
6781 Points ∼71% -25%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2240 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
2118 Points ∼80% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2096 Points ∼80% -6%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2345 Points ∼89% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2185 - 2444, n=12)
2281 Points ∼87% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=224)
2632 Points ∼100% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
914 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
411 Points ∼14% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
620 Points ∼21% -32%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
801 Points ∼27% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (897 - 995, n=12)
933 Points ∼31% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=224)
3010 Points ∼100% +229%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1052 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
501 Points ∼19% -52%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
735 Points ∼28% -30%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
938 Points ∼35% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1035 - 1140, n=12)
1074 Points ∼41% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=224)
2650 Points ∼100% +152%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2379 Points ∼92%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2206 Points ∼86% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1582 Points ∼61% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1729 Points ∼67% -27%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2579 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2154 - 2541, n=11)
2377 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=587)
2308 Points ∼89% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
990 Points ∼42%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
467 Points ∼20% -53%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
432 Points ∼18% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
548 Points ∼23% -45%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
844 Points ∼36% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (980 - 999, n=11)
988 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=587)
2344 Points ∼100% +137%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1138 Points ∼53%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
566 Points ∼26% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
505 Points ∼23% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
646 Points ∼30% -43%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
992 Points ∼46% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1097 - 1151, n=11)
1135 Points ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=588)
2154 Points ∼100% +89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2347 Points ∼90%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2201 Points ∼85% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1602 Points ∼62% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1745 Points ∼67% -26%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2598 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2199 - 2503, n=12)
2369 Points ∼91% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=614)
2211 Points ∼85% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1669 Points ∼53%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
809 Points ∼26% -52%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
735 Points ∼23% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
824 Points ∼26% -51%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1350 Points ∼43% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1650 - 1692, n=12)
1669 Points ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 22052, n=616)
3162 Points ∼100% +89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1783 Points ∼69%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
941 Points ∼36% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
835 Points ∼32% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
933 Points ∼36% -48%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1525 Points ∼59% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1754 - 1810, n=12)
1787 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=616)
2596 Points ∼100% +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2409 Points ∼95%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2251 Points ∼88% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1598 Points ∼63% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1869 Points ∼73% -22%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2549 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2212 - 2580, n=12)
2418 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=663)
2166 Points ∼85% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
945 Points ∼50%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
419 Points ∼22% -56%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
372 Points ∼19% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
545 Points ∼29% -42%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
848 Points ∼44% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (927 - 999, n=12)
970 Points ∼51% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=663)
1909 Points ∼100% +102%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1093 Points ∼60%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
512 Points ∼28% -53%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
448 Points ∼25% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
647 Points ∼36% -41%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
995 Points ∼55% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1076 - 1152, n=12)
1119 Points ∼62% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=664)
1810 Points ∼100% +66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2405 Points ∼95%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2273 Points ∼90% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1602 Points ∼63% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1874 Points ∼74% -22%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2536 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2282 - 2596, n=12)
2427 Points ∼96% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5301, n=706)
2042 Points ∼81% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1632 Points ∼64%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
780 Points ∼30% -52%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
735 Points ∼29% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
713 Points ∼28% -56%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1333 Points ∼52% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1564 - 1663, n=12)
1623 Points ∼63% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=705)
2563 Points ∼100% +57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1758 Points ∼80%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
913 Points ∼42% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
835 Points ∼38% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
827 Points ∼38% -53%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1490 Points ∼68% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1675 - 1795, n=12)
1751 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=708)
2184 Points ∼100% +24%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24457 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
16647 Points ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
12809 Points ∼52% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13009 Points ∼53% -47%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
22492 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (17865 - 24652, n=11)
20749 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=851)
16090 Points ∼66% -34%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24828 Points ∼85%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
14475 Points ∼49% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
13656 Points ∼47% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
14338 Points ∼49% -42%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21792 Points ∼74% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15403 - 25351, n=11)
24085 Points ∼82% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 224130, n=849)
29337 Points ∼100% +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24745 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
14907 Points ∼60% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
13435 Points ∼54% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
14020 Points ∼57% -43%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21943 Points ∼89% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (22445 - 25046, n=11)
23846 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=849)
22458 Points ∼91% -9%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼73%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
24 fps ∼48% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
23 fps ∼46% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
14 fps ∼28% -61%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
39 fps ∼79% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (35 - 37, n=10)
35.9 fps ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=842)
49.5 fps ∼100% +38%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
42 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
23 fps ∼55% -45%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
35 fps ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
21 fps ∼50% -50%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
35 fps ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (30 - 52, n=10)
35.4 fps ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 142, n=851)
32.9 fps ∼78% -22%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼64%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
10 fps ∼34% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
9.8 fps ∼33% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
12 fps ∼41% -37%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21 fps ∼71% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (19 - 20, n=10)
19.2 fps ∼65% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=747)
29.6 fps ∼100% +56%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
9.9 fps ∼29% -71%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
19 fps ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
24 fps ∼71% -29%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼56% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15 - 34, n=10)
20.7 fps ∼61% -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 119, n=755)
24.2 fps ∼71% -29%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼55%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
6.9 fps ∼29% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
6.6 fps ∼28% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
8.1 fps ∼34% -38%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
14 fps ∼59% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (13 - 13, n=10)
13 fps ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=610)
23.6 fps ∼100% +82%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
27 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
6.5 fps ∼24% -76%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
14 fps ∼52% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
17 fps ∼63% -37%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼44% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (10 - 27, n=10)
14.6 fps ∼54% -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=612)
21 fps ∼78% -22%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9.1 fps ∼76%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2 fps ∼17% -78%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
4 fps ∼33% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5.8 fps ∼48% -36%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.3 fps ∼19% -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (3.9 - 9.1, n=12)
5.53 fps ∼46% -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=379)
12 fps ∼100% +32%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼33%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1.2 fps ∼14% -57%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1.2 fps ∼14% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1.8 fps ∼22% -36%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4 fps ∼48% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2.7 - 2.8, n=12)
2.78 fps ∼33% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=377)
8.36 fps ∼100% +199%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼84%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.6 fps ∼20% -76%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
6.7 fps ∼37% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
9.7 fps ∼54% -35%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.1 fps ∼34% -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.2 - 15, n=12)
9.14 fps ∼51% -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 64, n=383)
17.9 fps ∼100% +19%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.2 fps ∼40%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.9 fps ∼19% -52%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
3.7 fps ∼18% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5 fps ∼24% -39%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼34% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7.8 - 8.4, n=12)
8.13 fps ∼40% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=383)
20.5 fps ∼100% +150%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.2 fps ∼46%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.9 fps ∼25% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
3.6 fps ∼23% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5.2 fps ∼33% -28%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.7 fps ∼49% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.9 - 7.2, n=10)
7.07 fps ∼45% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=535)
15.7 fps ∼100% +118%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼94%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.6 fps ∼26% -72%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
7.1 fps ∼51% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
10 fps ∼72% -23%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.5 fps ∼47% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (5.7 - 13, n=10)
7.69 fps ∼56% -41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=539)
13.8 fps ∼100% +6%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
167305 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
94601 Points ∼29% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
105840 Points ∼32% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (167305 - 181432, n=9)
171951 Points ∼52% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 700592, n=159)
330483 Points ∼100% +98%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1224 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1008 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
849 Points ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1035 Points ∼85% -15%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1090 Points ∼89% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (926 - 1400, n=9)
1101 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 2169, n=772)
847 Points ∼69% -31%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1932 Points ∼72%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1075 Points ∼40% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1009 Points ∼38% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1118 Points ∼42% -42%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1478 Points ∼55% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1881 - 1932, n=9)
1906 Points ∼71% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=772)
2674 Points ∼100% +38%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2780 Points ∼94%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1963 Points ∼67% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1287 Points ∼44% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2154 Points ∼73% -23%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2948 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1804 - 3174, n=9)
2681 Points ∼91% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=772)
2009 Points ∼68% -28%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4391 Points ∼83%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
4378 Points ∼83% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
2587 Points ∼49% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3869 Points ∼73% -12%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5297 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (4391 - 5089, n=9)
4825 Points ∼91% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=772)
3631 Points ∼69% -17%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2318 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1747 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1294 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1762 Points ∼76% -24%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2240 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2001 - 2556, n=9)
2271 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6402, n=772)
1870 Points ∼81% -19%
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=234)
43.3 Points ∼100% +49%
Honor 9X (Chrome 78)
32.916 Points ∼76% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22.9 - 31.2, n=6)
29.2 Points ∼67% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
29.117 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78)
25.689 Points ∼59% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
16.678 Points ∼39% -43%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=666)
50.8 Points ∼100% +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8)
47.5 Points ∼94% +42%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
45.541 Points ∼90% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78)
42.191 Points ∼83% +26%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
33.377 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
25.622 Points ∼50% -23%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=212)
45.5 runs/min ∼100% +79%
Honor 9X (Chrome 78)
33.9 runs/min ∼75% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (25.4 - 30.8, n=6)
28.9 runs/min ∼64% +14%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chome 81)
25.4 runs/min ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78)
23 runs/min ∼51% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
17.4 runs/min ∼38% -31%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=304)
71.4 Points ∼100% +88%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
58 Points ∼81% +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9)
50.9 Points ∼71% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78)
43 Points ∼60% +13%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
38 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
33 Points ∼46% -13%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor 9X (Chrome 78)
9851 Points ∼100% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9)
8901 Points ∼90% +45%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=837)
8521 Points ∼86% +39%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
8351 Points ∼85% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78)
8048 Points ∼82% +31%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
6133 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
4585 Points ∼47% -25%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
9976.3 ms * ∼100% -48%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=863)
9434 ms * ∼95% -40%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
6719 ms * ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78)
5707.4 ms * ∼57% +15%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
4900 ms * ∼49% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9)
4783 ms * ∼48% +29%
Honor 9X (Chrome 78)
4123.4 ms * ∼41% +39%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Motorola Moto G8Motorola Moto G7Xiaomi Redmi 8Samsung Galaxy A30sHonor 9XAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
5%
-3%
-6%
65%
-13%
-11%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
48.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
37%
63.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
31%
64.03 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
31%
67.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
38%
58.4 (11.2 - 74.7, n=141)
20%
51.8 (1.7 - 87.1, n=576)
6%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
68.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
26%
86.86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
26%
80.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
17%
76.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
77.4 (21.1 - 87.2, n=141)
13%
69.8 (8.1 - 96.5, n=576)
2%
Random Write 4KB
128.1
75.6
-41%
7.33
-94%
13.95
-89%
159.3
24%
28.7 (3.4 - 147, n=159)
-78%
41.8 (0.14 - 319, n=951)
-67%
Random Read 4KB
57.3
69.3
21%
78.98
38%
93.24
63%
142.32
148%
57.3 (11.4 - 149, n=159)
0%
64.5 (1.59 - 325, n=951)
13%
Sequential Write 256KB
239
216
-10%
202.65
-15%
101.74
-57%
196.1
-18%
177 (40 - 254, n=159)
-26%
144 (2.99 - 1321, n=951)
-40%
Sequential Read 256KB
301
297
-1%
285.66
-5%
291.79
-3%
860.34
186%
274 (95.6 - 704, n=159)
-9%
370 (12.1 - 2037, n=951)
23%
051015202530Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.18.0: Ø30 (28-31)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 0.18.0: Ø24.9 (23-26)
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.34.1.10: Ø30.1 (29-31)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.34.1.10: Ø30.1 (28-31)
A pleine charge
 41.2 °C38.3 °C36.5 °C 
 40.6 °C38.2 °C36.7 °C 
 40.5 °C38.5 °C36.1 °C 
Maximum: 41.2 °C
Moyenne: 38.5 °C
33.5 °C37.9 °C40.3 °C
33.8 °C37.6 °C41.6 °C
34.2 °C37.6 °C39.4 °C
Maximum: 41.6 °C
Moyenne: 37.3 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  41.3 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.428.9253530.63127.128.4402629.85030.430.86325.226.98022.72310025.522.912520.122.316019.230.420017.842.825017.849.531516.152.440016.654.350015.959.463014.36180014.767.3100014.871.8125014.367.8160014.166.1200016.368.9250014.471.4315013.870.1400013.970.5500014.265.2630014.561.6800014.665.2100001566.61250015.358.61600015.741.1SPL64.571.226.980.1N17.725.60.945.7median 15median 61.6Delta1.610.338.735.637.138.733.733.337.433.436.336.828.329.923.726.423.224.12230.520.442.218.445.417.75017.354.817.759.218.161.62066.216.367.115.57514.17714.174.614.571.714.366.51565.214.765.816.965.815.369.21573.614.573.214.758.214.555.96727.983.419.4154.5median 15.5median 65.82.38.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G8Motorola Moto G7
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto G7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 1.3 / 2 / 2.8 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 3.9 / 7.2 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto G8
4000 mAh		Motorola Moto G7
3000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi 8
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A30s
4000 mAh		Honor 9X
4000 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
6%
36%
31%
-49%
11%
16%
Idle Minimum *
1.3
1.1
15%
0.57
56%
0.79
39%
2.3
-77%
1.017 (0.62 - 1.7, n=11)
22%
0.891 (0.2 - 3.4, n=936)
31%
Idle Average *
2
1.8
10%
1.8
10%
1.98
1%
3
-50%
1.893 (1.3 - 2.3, n=11)
5%
1.757 (0.6 - 6.2, n=935)
12%
Idle Maximum *
2.8
2.6
7%
1.82
35%
2.03
27%
4.2
-50%
2.36 (1.6 - 3.5, n=11)
16%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=936)
27%
Load Average *
3.9
4.2
-8%
2.57
34%
2.37
39%
5.3
-36%
3.77 (2.61 - 4.7, n=11)
3%
4.14 (0.8 - 10.8, n=930)
-6%
Load Maximum *
7.2
6.8
6%
4.12
43%
3.68
49%
9.4
-31%
6.66 (5.12 - 7.7, n=11)
7%
6.15 (1.2 - 14.2, n=930)
15%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
32h 33min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16h 28min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
17h 28min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
4h 36min
Motorola Moto G8
4000 mAh		Motorola Moto G7
3000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi 8
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A30s
4000 mAh		Honor 9X
4000 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
-21%
9%
-9%
-16%
Reader / Idle
1953
1548
-21%
2521
29%
H.264
1048
819
-22%
798
-24%
982
-6%
WiFi v1.3
988
798
-19%
1157
17%
634
-36%
832
-16%
Load
276
219
-21%
308
12%
317
15%

Points positifs

+ appareil photo grand-angle et macro
+ autonomie
+ performances
+ lecteur d'empreintes digitales
+ chauffe

Points négatifs

- précision du GPS
- résolution 720p
- distribution de la lumière
- contraste de certaines photos

Verdict

En test : le Motorola Moto G8. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Motorola Allemagne.
En test : le Motorola Moto G8. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Motorola Allemagne.

Le Motorola Moto G8 est un smartphone du milieu de gamme correct pour les petits budgets. Il possède un appareil photo plus conventionnel, et donc plus utile, que le Moto G8 Plus. Les appareils photo se comportent bien pour cette gamme, et intègrent même un zoom. En revanche, le contraste est parfois trop faible.

Nous avons également apprécié l'autonomie du G8, ses performances supérieures à la moyenne, et son châssis robuste. Le lecteur d'empreintes digitales dédié est un plaisir à utiliser, l'appareil ne chauffe pas trop, et le haut-parleur est honnête.

Le Motorola Moto G8 est abordable et propose de multiples capteurs photo, et parvient de ce fait à sortir du lot.

La baisse de prix par rapport au prédécesseur est directement visible, avec la baisse de la résolution de l'écran. Heureusement, elle reste assez élevée, et l'écran reste de bonne qualité. Face à ses concurrents, le principal avantage du G8 reste son appareil photo polyvalent - mais il est vrai que la plupart des smartphone du milieu de gamme de 2020 n'ont pas encore été lancés. Mais à son prix actuel, le Moto G8 propose un ensemble correct, sans défaut majeur.

 

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Motorola Moto G8 - 05/12/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Châssis
79%
Clavier
66 / 75 → 88%
Dispositif de pointage
91%
Connectivité
37 / 70 → 53%
Poids
89%
Autonomie
91%
Écran
86%
Performances en jeu
13 / 64 → 20%
Performances dans les applications
56 / 86 → 65%
Chauffe
88%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
67 / 90 → 75%
Appareil photo
53%
Moyenne
71%
77%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Motorola Moto G8 : smartphone à 200 € avec appareil photo polyvalent
Florian Schmitt, 2020-06-10 (Update: 2020-06-10)