Notebookcheck

Test du Razer Blade 15 Modèle de base (i7-9750H, GTX 1660 Ti, FHD) : pas de RTX ? Aucun problème...

Plus rapide que tous les autres Blade 15 GTX. La GTX 1660 Ti n’est que très légèrement moins performante que la RTX 2060 en puissance graphique pure, tout en coûtant quelques centaines d’euros de moins, et en surpassant la plus puissante des configurations Blade 15 Pascal. Certains défauts, comme l’écran légèrement moins fidèle et des performances CPU inférieures, nuisent à peine à l’expérience globale.
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduit par Prévots),
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti (Blade 15 Gamme)
Processeur
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile - 6144 Mo, Processeur: 1455 MHz, Mémoire: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 436.30, Optimus
Mémoire
16384 Mo 
, DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43, double canal
Écran
15.6 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPP, BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, BOE0804, brillant: non
Carte mère
Intel HM370
Disque dur
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, 256 Go 
, secondaire : Seagate ST1000LM048
Carte son
NVIDIA TU116
Connexions
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm
Réseau
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 19.9 x 355 x 235
Batterie
65 Wh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: 720p
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, Razer Central, Synapse, 12 Mois Garantie
Poids
2.1 kg, Alimentation: 691 g
Prix
1800 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

360.5 mm 276 mm 18.3 mm 2.2 kg358 mm 248 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg356 mm 250 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg357 mm 235 mm 17 mm 2 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.2 kg
A l'avant : aucune connectivité.
A l'avant : aucune connectivité.
Côté droit : Thunderbolt 3, USB A 3.1, HDMI 2.0, mDP 1.4, verrou de sécurité Kensington.
Côté droit : Thunderbolt 3, USB A 3.1, HDMI 2.0, mDP 1.4, verrou de sécurité Kensington.
A l'arrière : aucune connectivité.
A l'arrière : aucune connectivité.
Côté gauche : entrée secteur, Gigabit RJ-45, 2 USB A 3.1, combo audio 3,5 mm.
Côté gauche : entrée secteur, Gigabit RJ-45, 2 USB A 3.1, combo audio 3,5 mm.
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
696 MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
688 MBit/s ∼99% +6%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
656 MBit/s ∼94% +1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
649 MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
718 MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼94% +3%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
659 MBit/s ∼92%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
507 MBit/s ∼71% -23%
307.7
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
310.7
cd/m²
294.2
cd/m²
312.7
cd/m²
291.8
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
322.5
cd/m²
299.7
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
BOE NV156FHM-N4K
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 322.5 cd/m² Moyenne: 304.9 cd/m² Minimum: 16.94 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 90 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 312.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 1158:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.57 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8, calibrated: 2.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6
91.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, OLED, 15.6, 3840x2160
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
3936%
-20%
3932%
30%
3889%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
13.6 (7.2, 6.4)
12.8 (6.8, 6)
6%
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
-24%
16.4 (7.6, 6.8)
-21%
2.3 (1.1, 1.2)
83%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
-12%
Response Time Black / White *
10 (6, 4)
10.4 (6, 4.4)
-4%
11.6 (7.2, 4.4)
-16%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
12%
2.4 (1.1, 1.3)
76%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-12%
PWM Frequency
200 (99)
23810 (10)
11805%
23810 (24)
11805%
59.52 (100)
-70%
23580 (24)
11690%
Screen
17%
7%
-17%
6%
6%
Brightness middle
312.7
293
-6%
314.7
1%
324.2
4%
421.2
35%
266
-15%
Brightness
305
270
-11%
312
2%
304
0%
417
37%
248
-19%
Brightness Distribution
90
87
-3%
90
0%
90
0%
94
4%
89
-1%
Black Level *
0.27
0.29
-7%
0.38
-41%
0.38
-41%
0.31
-15%
Contrast
1158
1010
-13%
828
-28%
853
-26%
858
-26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.57
1.69
63%
2.56
44%
5.01
-10%
6.06
-33%
2.78
39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.81
3.37
51%
4.89
28%
12.7
-86%
11.89
-75%
5.96
12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.91
1.24
57%
1.71
41%
1.64
44%
0.91
69%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.3
2.3
47%
3.4
21%
7.9
-84%
2.8
35%
3.58
17%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.3 96%
2.3 96%
2.35 94%
2.15 102%
2.46 89%
CCT
7098 92%
6758 96%
6435 101%
8455 77%
6235 104%
7186 90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59.4
63
6%
60.7
2%
60.8
2%
81
36%
62
4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91.3
98.5
8%
94.6
4%
95.5
5%
99.6
9%
96
5%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
1977% / 857%
-7% / 3%
1958% / 829%
18% / 12%
1948% / 838%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
10 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 6 ms hausse
↘ 4 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
13.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 7.2 ms hausse
↘ 6.4 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 200 Hz ≤ 99 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 200 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 99 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 200 Hz est relativement faible, les personnes les plus sensibles devraient percevoir un scintillement et être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire accrue (avec le niveau de luminosité indiqué)

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 17685 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø925 (918.74-983.02)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1056 (1046.13-1175)
Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1026 (960.41-1036.48)
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø991 (974.33-1083.86)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
203 Points ∼88% +19%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
202 Points ∼88% +19%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points ∼82% +11%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=80)
184 Points ∼80% +8%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
Intel Core i7-8565U
174 Points ∼76% +2%
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL
Intel Core i5-8300H
171 Points ∼74% +1%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
171 Points ∼74% +1%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
171 Points ∼74% +1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H
170 Points ∼74%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points ∼68% -8%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
144 Points ∼63% -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1821 Points ∼42% +89%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points ∼39% +79%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
1465 Points ∼33% +52%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (952 - 1306, n=83)
1180 Points ∼27% +22%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
1116 Points ∼26% +16%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H
964 Points ∼22%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
850 Points ∼19% -12%
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL
Intel Core i5-8300H
805 Points ∼18% -16%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
805 Points ∼18% -16%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points ∼17% -24%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
Intel Core i7-8565U
677 Points ∼15% -30%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
2.11 Points ∼82%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (1.96 - 2.19, n=10)
2.1 Points ∼82%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points ∼71%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1.64 Points ∼64%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
18.94 Points ∼43%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (11.3 - 14.1, n=10)
13 Points ∼29%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
9.21 Points ∼21%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.17 Points ∼19%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
45527 Points ∼70%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
42677 Points ∼65%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
42456 Points ∼65%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (28251 - 36304, n=13)
33539 Points ∼51%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
32846 Points ∼50%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
25656 Points ∼39%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21978 Points ∼34%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
20687 Points ∼32%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
7877 Points ∼73%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
7682 Points ∼71%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
6967 Points ∼64%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (6659 - 7214, n=13)
6923 Points ∼64%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
6579 Points ∼61%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
6421 Points ∼59%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5939 Points ∼55%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4770 Points ∼44%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL
Intel Core i5-8300H
278.469 s * ∼3%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
231.67 s * ∼3%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
197.075 s * ∼2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
 
154 s * ∼2%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
118.733 s * ∼1%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
110.381 s * ∼1%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
170 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
964 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
109.79 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Aide
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7236 Points ∼56% +23%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
6888 Points ∼53% +17%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
6675 Points ∼52% +13%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (4426 - 7638, n=15)
6558 Points ∼51% +11%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
6110 Points ∼47% +4%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5898 Points ∼46%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5452 Points ∼42% -8%
Productivity
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8200 Points ∼79% +12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
7695 Points ∼74% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (7241 - 8136, n=15)
7519 Points ∼72% +3%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
7494 Points ∼72% +3%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7290 Points ∼70%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
7180 Points ∼69% -2%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6938 Points ∼67% -5%
Essentials
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
9701 Points ∼85% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
9472 Points ∼83% +1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9405 Points ∼82%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (8621 - 10098, n=15)
9360 Points ∼82% 0%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9109 Points ∼80% -3%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
8791 Points ∼77% -7%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7200 Points ∼63% -23%
Score
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5839 Points ∼72% +10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5697 Points ∼70% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (4807 - 5829, n=15)
5531 Points ∼68% +4%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
5469 Points ∼67% +3%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
5374 Points ∼66% +1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5301 Points ∼65%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4646 Points ∼57% -12%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
6035 Points ∼88% +10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5749 Points ∼84% +5%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5731 Points ∼84% +5%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
5706 Points ∼84% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (5041 - 5913, n=12)
5540 Points ∼81% +1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5480 Points ∼80%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
4762 Points ∼70% -13%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
4851 Points ∼80% +19%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4676 Points ∼77% +15%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (4074 - 5217, n=11)
4518 Points ∼74% +11%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4380 Points ∼72% +8%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
4207 Points ∼69% +3%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4074 Points ∼67%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
3799 Points ∼62% -7%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4074 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5480 points
Aide
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
AS SSD
23%
13%
28%
6%
-17%
Copy Game MB/s
1149.77
976.6
-15%
1426.35
24%
1823.85
59%
1140.57
-1%
Copy Program MB/s
513.29
496.53
-3%
576.02
12%
983.98
92%
454.24
-12%
Copy ISO MB/s
1539.06
2082.66
35%
2073.16
35%
3182.39
107%
2085.95
36%
Score Total
3177
4221
33%
3633
14%
3638
15%
2870
-10%
2039
-36%
Score Write
1450
2102
45%
1481
2%
1693
17%
1141
-21%
802
-45%
Score Read
1152
1394
21%
1407
22%
1294
12%
1186
3%
815
-29%
Access Time Write *
0.104
0.034
67%
0.108
-4%
0.039
62%
0.065
37%
0.045
57%
Access Time Read *
0.063
0.05
21%
0.065
-3%
0.05
21%
0.042
33%
0.071
-13%
4K-64 Write
1212.2
1807.21
49%
1135.27
-6%
1456.13
20%
921.88
-24%
570.49
-53%
4K-64 Read
917.46
1159.06
26%
1177.33
28%
1077.98
17%
875.61
-5%
610.88
-33%
4K Write
105.96
108.34
2%
108.86
3%
98.3
-7%
126.51
19%
83.83
-21%
4K Read
51.32
52.08
1%
37.2
-28%
43.25
-16%
59.11
15%
43.09
-16%
Seq Write
1315.15
1864.07
42%
2371.22
80%
1386.27
5%
923.81
-30%
1474.76
12%
Seq Read
1828.99
1832.18
0%
1924.95
5%
1723.09
-6%
2516.94
38%
1612.2
-12%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3251 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1417 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 578.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 494.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1494 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1427 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 135 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
10243 Points ∼54% +92%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
7840 Points ∼42% +47%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
7732 Points ∼41% +45%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
6728 Points ∼36% +26%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
6380 Points ∼34% +20%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
6131 Points ∼33% +15%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
5913 Points ∼31% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (5335 - 5931, n=20)
5636 Points ∼30% +6%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5335 Points ∼28%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
4734 Points ∼25% -11%
Razer Blade (2017) UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
3478 Points ∼18% -35%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H
3470 Points ∼18% -35%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
2536 Points ∼13% -52%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
25126 Points ∼58% +70%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
20718 Points ∼48% +40%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
19338 Points ∼45% +31%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
18879 Points ∼43% +28%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
18153 Points ∼42% +23%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
16024 Points ∼37% +9%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
15696 Points ∼36% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (14186 - 15482, n=22)
14791 Points ∼34% 0%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
14753 Points ∼34%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
14463 Points ∼33% -2%
Razer Blade (2017) UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
10715 Points ∼25% -27%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H
9350 Points ∼22% -37%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
7791 Points ∼18% -47%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
151390 Points ∼77% +54%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
115893 Points ∼59% +18%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
107110 Points ∼55% +9%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
107083 Points ∼55% +9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
106170 Points ∼54% +8%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
101481 Points ∼52% +3%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
98452 Points ∼50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (59839 - 103428, n=17)
93547 Points ∼48% -5%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
91194 Points ∼47% -7%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
73739 Points ∼38% -25%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H
59375 Points ∼30% -40%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
49314 Points ∼25% -50%
Razer Blade (2017) UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
48409 Points ∼25% -51%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
13940 Points ∼62% +22%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13742 Points ∼61% +20%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
12460 Points ∼55% +9%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
12260 Points ∼54% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (9500 - 13311, n=21)
11919 Points ∼53% +4%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H
11904 Points ∼53% +4%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
11416 Points ∼50%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
10749 Points ∼48% -6%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
10129 Points ∼45% -11%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
8855 Points ∼39% -22%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
8540 Points ∼38% -25%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
27762 Points ∼47% +44%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
26413 Points ∼45% +37%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
24868 Points ∼42% +29%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
22723 Points ∼39% +18%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
22128 Points ∼38% +14%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
20765 Points ∼35% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (18610 - 20940, n=22)
19988 Points ∼34% +3%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
19329 Points ∼33%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
18234 Points ∼31% -6%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H
13143 Points ∼22% -32%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
9466 Points ∼16% -51%
3DMark 11 Performance
16594 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
31563 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
12926 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
5406 points
Aide
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
87 fps ∼100% +30%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
87 fps ∼100% +30%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
83 fps ∼95% +24%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)
76.7 fps ∼88% +14%
Asus G752VS
Intel Core i7-6820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
72 (59min) fps ∼83% +7%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
70 fps ∼80% +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (62 - 73, n=7)
67.7 fps ∼78% +1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
67 fps ∼77%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
47 fps ∼54% -30%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
34 fps ∼39% -49%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
31 fps ∼36% -54%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
7 fps ∼8% -90%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
81.3 fps ∼100% +58%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
69 fps ∼85% +34%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)
62 (43min - 74max) fps ∼76% +20%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
61.7 fps ∼76% +20%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
56 fps ∼69% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (51.6 - 61.3, n=19)
55.8 fps ∼69% +8%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
51.6 fps ∼63%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
36.5 fps ∼45% -29%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
36 fps ∼44% -30%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
25.8 fps ∼32% -50%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
9 fps ∼11% -83%
01020304050Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ: Ø47 (38-50)
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 291.2 259.6 241.3 132.5 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 247.6 169.7 97.5 51.6 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 115 83 75 67 fps
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Noise
8%
-11%
3%
-11%
4%
off / environment *
28.5
28.3
1%
28.3
1%
28.2
1%
30
-5%
28.4
-0%
Idle Minimum *
30.3
28.8
5%
28.5
6%
28.2
7%
31
-2%
28.4
6%
Idle Average *
30.5
28.8
6%
28.5
7%
28.2
8%
34
-11%
28.4
7%
Idle Maximum *
30.5
29
5%
49
-61%
30.4
-0%
39
-28%
29.6
3%
Load Average *
41
33.5
18%
49
-20%
43.8
-7%
46
-12%
43.5
-6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
45
6%
49
-2%
47.2
2%
53
-10%
45.7
5%
Load Maximum *
51.9
45.2
13%
55
-6%
47.2
9%
55
-6%
45.7
12%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
30.3 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
41 / 51.9 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 28.5 dB(A)
 46.2 °C52 °C46 °C 
 42 °C50.2 °C42 °C 
 39 °C37.2 °C39.6 °C 
Maximum: 52 °C
Moyenne: 43.8 °C
42.2 °C52.2 °C42.8 °C
43.6 °C49 °C43.4 °C
41.2 °C43.6 °C40.6 °C
Maximum: 52.2 °C
Moyenne: 44.3 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  60 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.4 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.2 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 42.6 °C / 109 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-10.8 °C / -19.5 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.7442538.340.53140.838.84037.938.55038.6396338.540.18035.436.610034.338.812535.142.216033.649.520032.952.725032.359.131531.964.740030.867.95003168.363030.170.380030.171.1100030.872.7125029.170.2160028.770.8200028.668.5250028.568315028.365.940002867.5500027.961630027.858.5800027.856.91000027.753.91250027.549.81600027.447.4SPL41.180.1N4.247.3median 29.1median 64.7Delta2.17.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRazer Blade 15 GTX 1660 TiApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.14 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.56 / 1.14 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 18.7 / 30.7 / 33.9 Watts
Fortement sollicité