Test du Razer Blade 15 Modèle de base (i7-9750H, GTX 1660 Ti, FHD) : pas de RTX ? Aucun problème...
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti (Blade 15 Gamme)
Processeur
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile - 6144 Mo, Processeur: 1455 MHz, Mémoire: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 436.30, Optimus
Mémoire
16384 Mo
, DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43, double canal
Écran
15.60 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPP, BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, BOE0804, brillant: non
Carte mère
Intel HM370
Disque dur
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, 256 Go
, secondaire : Seagate ST1000LM048
Carte son
NVIDIA TU116
Connexions
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm
Réseau
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 19.9 x 355 x 235
Batterie
65 Wh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: 720p
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, Razer Central, Synapse, 12 Mois Garantie
Poids
2.1 kg, Alimentation: 691 g
Prix
1800 USD
Liens
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Top 10
» Le Top 10 des PC portables multimédia
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu légers
» Le Top 10 des ordinateurs portables bureautiques
» Le Top 10 des PC portables bureautiques premium/professionnels
» Le Top 10 des Stations de travail mobiles
» Le Top 10 des Ultraportables
» Le Top 10 des Ultrabooks
» Le Top 10 des Convertibles
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes Windows
» Le Top 10 des Smartphones
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 300 euros
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 500 euros
» Le Top 25 des meilleurs écrans d'ordinateurs
| Networking | |
| iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE NV156FHM-N4K
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 322.5 cd/m² Moyenne: 304.9 cd/m² Minimum: 16.94 cd/m²Homogénéité de la luminosité: 90 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 312.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 1158:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.57 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 2.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
91.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Alienware m15 R2 P87F Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, OLED, 15.60, 3840x2160 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 15.60, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 3936% | -20% | 3932% | 30% | 3889% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 13.6 (7.2, 6.4) | 12.8 (6.8, 6) 6% | 16.8 (9.2, 7.6) -24% | 16.4 (7.6, 6.8) -21% | 2.3 (1.1, 1.2) 83% | 15.2 (7.6, 7.6) -12% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10 (6, 4) | 10.4 (6, 4.4) -4% | 11.6 (7.2, 4.4) -16% | 8.8 (4.4, 4.4) 12% | 2.4 (1.1, 1.3) 76% | 11.2 (6.8, 4.4) -12% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 (99) | 23810 (10) 11805% | 23810 (24) 11805% | 59.52 (100) -70% | 23580 (24) 11690% | |
| Screen | 17% | 7% | -17% | 6% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 312.7 | 293 -6% | 314.7 1% | 324.2 4% | 421.2 35% | 266 -15% |
| Brightness | 305 | 270 -11% | 312 2% | 304 0% | 417 37% | 248 -19% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 87 -3% | 90 0% | 90 0% | 94 4% | 89 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.29 -7% | 0.38 -41% | 0.38 -41% | 0.31 -15% | |
| Contrast | 1158 | 1010 -13% | 828 -28% | 853 -26% | 858 -26% | |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 4.57 | 1.69 63% | 2.56 44% | 5.01 -10% | 6.06 -33% | 2.78 39% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 6.81 | 3.37 51% | 4.89 28% | 12.7 -86% | 11.89 -75% | 5.96 12% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 2.91 | 1.24 57% | 1.71 41% | 1.64 44% | 0.91 69% | |
| Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 4.3 | 2.3 47% | 3.4 21% | 7.9 -84% | 2.8 35% | 3.58 17% |
| Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.3 96% | 2.3 96% | 2.35 94% | 2.15 102% | 2.46 89% |
| CCT | 7098 92% | 6758 96% | 6435 101% | 8455 77% | 6235 104% | 7186 90% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.4 | 63 6% | 60.7 2% | 60.8 2% | 81 36% | 62 4% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91.3 | 98.5 8% | 94.6 4% | 95.5 5% | 99.6 9% | 96 5% |
| Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres) | 1977% /
857% | -7% /
3% | 1958% /
829% | 18% /
12% | 1948% /
838% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Temps de réponse de l'écran
ℹ
Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.| ↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 6 ms hausse |  |
| ↘ 4 ms chute | ||
| L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés. | ||
| ↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80% | ||
| 13.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 7.2 ms hausse |  |
| ↘ 6.4 ms chute | ||
| L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.7 ms) de tous les appareils testés. | ||
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)
ℹ
Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.| Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé | 200 Hz | ≤ 99 Niveau de luminosité |  |
Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 200 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 99 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur. La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 200 Hz est relativement faible, les personnes les plus sensibles devraient percevoir un scintillement et être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire accrue (avec le niveau de luminosité indiqué) En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9725 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active. | |||
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø925 (918.74-983.02)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1056 (1046.13-1175)
Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1026 (960.41-1036.48)
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø991 (974.33-1083.86)
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (170 - 194, n=82) | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| Schenker Key 16 | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus ROG GA502DU | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (952 - 1306, n=85) | |
| Schenker Key 16 | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
| Asus ROG GA502DU | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (1.96 - 2.19, n=10) | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus ROG GA502DU | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (11.3 - 14.1, n=10) | |
| Asus ROG GA502DU | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (28251 - 36304, n=13) | |
| Schenker Key 16 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus ROG GA502DU | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (6659 - 7214, n=13) | |
| Schenker Key 16 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus ROG GA502DU | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus ROG GA502DU | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4074 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5480 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5301 points | |
Aide | ||
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Alienware m15 R2 P87F 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 23% | 13% | 28% | 6% | -17% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1149.77 | 976.6 -15% | 1426.35 24% | 1823.85 59% | 1140.57 -1% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 513.29 | 496.53 -3% | 576.02 12% | 983.98 92% | 454.24 -12% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1539.06 | 2082.66 35% | 2073.16 35% | 3182.39 107% | 2085.95 36% | |
| Score Total | 3177 | 4221 33% | 3633 14% | 3638 15% | 2870 -10% | 2039 -36% |
| Score Write | 1450 | 2102 45% | 1481 2% | 1693 17% | 1141 -21% | 802 -45% |
| Score Read | 1152 | 1394 21% | 1407 22% | 1294 12% | 1186 3% | 815 -29% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.104 | 0.034 67% | 0.108 -4% | 0.039 62% | 0.065 37% | 0.045 57% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.063 | 0.05 21% | 0.065 -3% | 0.05 21% | 0.042 33% | 0.071 -13% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1212.2 | 1807.21 49% | 1135.27 -6% | 1456.13 20% | 921.88 -24% | 570.49 -53% |
| 4K-64 Read | 917.46 | 1159.06 26% | 1177.33 28% | 1077.98 17% | 875.61 -5% | 610.88 -33% |
| 4K Write | 105.96 | 108.34 2% | 108.86 3% | 98.3 -7% | 126.51 19% | 83.83 -21% |
| 4K Read | 51.32 | 52.08 1% | 37.2 -28% | 43.25 -16% | 59.11 15% | 43.09 -16% |
| Seq Write | 1315.15 | 1864.07 42% | 2371.22 80% | 1386.27 5% | 923.81 -30% | 1474.76 12% |
| Seq Read | 1828.99 | 1832.18 0% | 1924.95 5% | 1723.09 -6% | 2516.94 38% | 1612.2 -12% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3251 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1417 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
578.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
494.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1494 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1427 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
41.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
135 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 16594 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 31563 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 12926 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5406 points | |
Aide | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
| Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (62 - 73, n=8) | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
| Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
| HP Envy 13-ah0003ng | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
| Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (51.6 - 65.1, n=21) | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
| Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
| HP Envy 13-ah0003ng | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ: Ø47 (38-50)
| Bas | Moyen | Élevé | Ultra | ||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 291.2 | 259.6 | 241.3 | 132.5 | fps |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 247.6 | 169.7 | 97.5 | 51.6 | fps |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 115 | 83 | 75 | 67 | fps |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 8% | -11% | 3% | -11% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 28.5 | 28.3 1% | 28.3 1% | 28.2 1% | 30 -5% | 28.4 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.3 | 28.8 5% | 28.5 6% | 28.2 7% | 31 -2% | 28.4 6% |
| Idle Average * | 30.5 | 28.8 6% | 28.5 7% | 28.2 8% | 34 -11% | 28.4 7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.5 | 29 5% | 49 -61% | 30.4 -0% | 39 -28% | 29.6 3% |
| Load Average * | 41 | 33.5 18% | 49 -20% | 43.8 -7% | 46 -12% | 43.5 -6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 45 6% | 49 -2% | 47.2 2% | 53 -10% | 45.7 5% |
| Load Maximum * | 51.9 | 45.2 13% | 55 -6% | 47.2 9% | 55 -6% | 45.7 12% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Degré de la nuisance sonore
| Au repos |
| 30.3 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB(A) |
| Fortement sollicité |
| 41 / 51.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencieux 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) bruyant |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance) environment noise: 28.5 dB(A) | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.4 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.2 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 42.6 °C / 109 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-10.8 °C / -19.5 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.2 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 42.6 °C / 109 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-10.8 °C / -19.5 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.14 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Consommation énergétique
| Éteint/en veille | 0.56 / 1.14 Watts |
| Au repos | 18.7 / 30.7 / 33.9 Watts |
| Fortement sollicité |
93.4 / 195.3 Watts |
   
| |
Légende:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q |
|---|