Notebookcheck

Test du Sony Xperia 1 II : le fleuron à l'appareil photo de référence

Plus belles images avec un logiciel professionnel. Le Sony Xperia 1 II est équipé de l'appli Cinema Pro, déjà vue dans d'autres smartphones de Sony, et d'une nouvelle appli d'appareil photo. Elle donne au Xperia des fonctionnalités trouvées dans les appareils photo DSLR de Sony, ce qui va séduire les fans de photo. Lisez notre rapport de test pour découvrir si le smartphone à 1 200 € est assez bon au quotidien pour justifier son prix.
Mike Wobker, Felicitas Krohn (traduit par Prévots), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Sony Xperia 1 II (Xperia Gamme)
Processeur
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Carte graphique
Mémoire
8192 Mo 
Écran
6.50 pouces 21:9, 3840 x 1644 pixel 643 PPP, capacitif, OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, brillant: oui, HDR
Disque dur
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 Go 
, 236 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, USB C, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD (jusqu'à 1 To), 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, gyroscope, capteur de proximité, baromètre, e-boussole, USB C
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G GSM GPRS / EDGE (850 / 900 / 1 800 / 1 900), 3G UMTS / HSPA+ (1 / 2 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 8 / 19), 4G LTE Cat19 / Cat13 (1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 7 / 8 / 12 / 13 / 17 / 19 / 20 / 25 / 26 / 28 / 29 / 32 / 34 / 38 / 39 / 40 / 41 / 46 / 66), 5G (n1 / n3 / n28 / n77 / , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 7.6 x 165.1 x 71.1
Batterie
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Android 10
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 12 MPix (f/1,7, 24 mm, 1/1,7") + 12 MP (zoom optique x3, f/2,4, 70 mm, 1/3,4", 1,0 µm) + 12 MP (f/2,2, 16 mm, 1/2,55") + 0,3 MP (TOF 3D)
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix f/2,0, 24 mm, 1/4", 1,12 µm
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: 2 haut-parleurs, stéréos, Clavier: virtuel, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, adaptateur secteur USB, câble USB C, écouteurs stéréos avec prise 3,5 mm, Xperia Assist, Cinema Pro, Photo Pro, 24 Mois Garantie, DAS (tête) : 1,12 W/kg, DAS (corps) : 0,67 W/kg, waterproof
Poids
181.4 g, Alimentation: 69 g
Prix
1200 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Appareils du comparatif

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Drive
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
85 %
10/20
Sony Xperia 1 II
SD 865, Adreno 650
181.4 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.50"3840x1644
88 %
05/20
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
208 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
88 %
05/20
OnePlus 8 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
199 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.78"3168x1440
89 %
05/20
Huawei P40 Pro
Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16
209 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.58"2640x1200
89 %
09/20
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
208 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.90"3088x1440
87 %
11/19
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
226 g64 GB SSD6.50"2688x1242
Sony Xperia 1 II
Sony Xperia 1 II
Sony Xperia 1 II
Sony Xperia 1 II
Sony Xperia 1 II
Sony Xperia 1 II
Sony Xperia 1 II
Sony Xperia 1 II

Comparaison des tailles

165.3 mm 74.3 mm 8.5 mm 199 g164.8 mm 77.2 mm 8.1 mm 208 g165.1 mm 71.1 mm 7.6 mm 181.4 g162.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.96 mm 208 g158.2 mm 72.6 mm 8.95 mm 209 g158 mm 77.8 mm 8.1 mm 226 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
883 (834min - 919max) MBit/s ∼100% +18%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
870 (841min - 882max) MBit/s ∼99% +16%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
831 (745min - 872max) MBit/s ∼94% +11%
Huawei P40 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
821 (388min - 998max) MBit/s ∼93% +10%
Sony Xperia 1 II
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
748 (550min - 820max) MBit/s ∼85%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
580 (550min - 597max) MBit/s ∼66% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=641)
290 MBit/s ∼33% -61%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P40 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1544 (797min - 1619max) MBit/s ∼100% +76%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
876 (767min - 904max) MBit/s ∼57% 0%
Sony Xperia 1 II
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
875 (787min - 899max) MBit/s ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
816 (403min - 832max) MBit/s ∼53% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
772 (691min - 832max) MBit/s ∼50% -12%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
589 (461min - 625max) MBit/s ∼38% -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=641)
276 MBit/s ∼18% -68%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø748 (550-820)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø875 (787-899)
Navigation - Sony Xperia 1 II
Navigation - Sony Xperia 1 II
Navigation - Sony Xperia 1 II
Navigation - Sony Xperia 1 II
Navigation - Sony Xperia 1 II
Navigation - Sony Xperia 1 II
Navigation - Garmin Edge 520
Navigation - Garmin Edge 520
Navigation - Garmin Edge 520
Navigation - Garmin Edge 520
Navigation - Garmin Edge 520
Navigation - Garmin Edge 520

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Main cameraWide-angleCityscapeLow-light photography
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker
22.6 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
32.2 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
34 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
40.4 ∆E
39.7 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
32 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
32.2 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Sony Xperia 1 II: 29.98 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 40.35 ∆E
ColorChecker
4.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Sony Xperia 1 II: 6.52 ∆E min: 2.25 - max: 10.8 ∆E
544
cd/m²
557
cd/m²
580
cd/m²
545
cd/m²
557
cd/m²
580
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
555
cd/m²
579
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 580 cd/m² Moyenne: 560.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.1 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 94 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 557 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.86 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
123.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.171
Sony Xperia 1 II
OLED, 3840x1644, 6.50
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67
OnePlus 8 Pro
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.78
Huawei P40 Pro
OLED, 2640x1200, 6.58
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.90
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.50
Screen
48%
53%
34%
11%
42%
Brightness middle
557
753
35%
796
43%
584
5%
860
54%
790
42%
Brightness
561
762
36%
779
39%
576
3%
878
57%
790
41%
Brightness Distribution
94
96
2%
94
0%
95
1%
96
2%
97
3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.86
0.9
69%
0.68
76%
1.1
62%
4.5
-57%
1.4
51%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.29
1.6
78%
1.55
79%
2.3
68%
10.4
-43%
3.4
53%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5
1.5
70%
1.1
78%
1.8
64%
2.4
52%
1.9
62%
Gamma
2.171 101%
2.24 98%
2.237 98%
2.16 102%
2 110%
2.23 99%
CCT
6993 93%
6415 101%
6310 103%
6355 102%
6466 101%
6466 101%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 240.4 Hz

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 240.4 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) .

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 240.4 Hz est relativement faible, les personnes les plus sensibles devraient percevoir un scintillement et être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire accrue (avec le niveau de luminosité indiqué)

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9725 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
9 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 5 ms hausse
↘ 4 ms chute
L'écran montre de faibles temps de réponse, un bon écran pour jouer.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 3 ms hausse
↘ 3 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.7 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3129 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
5532 Points ∼100% +77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2896 - 3310, n=13)
3153 Points ∼57% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 5532, n=64)
1852 Points ∼33% -41%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2893 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4789 Points ∼100% +66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2634 - 3665, n=13)
3077 Points ∼64% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 4789, n=67)
1634 Points ∼34% -44%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3290 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3338 Points ∼96% +1%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3318 Points ∼95% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3165 Points ∼91% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
2787 Points ∼80% -15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3476 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2687 - 3449, n=21)
3273 Points ∼94% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 4201, n=165)
1959 Points ∼56% -40%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
898 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
906 Points ∼68% +1%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
909 Points ∼69% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
779 Points ∼59% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
940 Points ∼71% +5%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1326 Points ∼100% +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (764 - 924, n=21)
903 Points ∼68% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1604, n=165)
567 Points ∼43% -37%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9762 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10952 Points ∼93% +12%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11153 Points ∼95% +14%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
11341 Points ∼96% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
11784 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9202 - 15299, n=22)
11268 Points ∼96% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=564)
6088 Points ∼52% -38%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12356 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
13142 Points ∼90% +6%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13471 Points ∼93% +9%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
14352 Points ∼99% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
14551 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (10990 - 19989, n=21)
13586 Points ∼93% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=714)
6701 Points ∼46% -46%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3863 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3830 Points ∼94% -1%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3888 Points ∼96% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4057 Points ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3122 Points ∼77% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1786 - 4061, n=19)
3414 Points ∼84% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=218)
2638 Points ∼65% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8064 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8173 Points ∼99% +1%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8279 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6360 Points ∼77% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6378 Points ∼77% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7618 - 9104, n=19)
8249 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=218)
3023 Points ∼37% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6495 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6578 Points ∼99% +1%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6618 Points ∼100% +2%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5648 Points ∼85% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
5178 Points ∼78% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4582 - 6961, n=20)
6202 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=218)
2666 Points ∼40% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5354 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5277 Points ∼92% -1%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5506 Points ∼96% +3%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5728 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4273 Points ∼75% -20%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4957 - 5780, n=20)
5344 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=574)
2295 Points ∼40% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9380 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9356 Points ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9379 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6771 Points ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8239 Points ∼88% -12%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8633 - 9567, n=20)
9380 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=574)
2295 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8037 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7986 Points ∼98% -1%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8111 Points ∼100% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6508 Points ∼80% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6830 Points ∼84% -15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7517 - 8269, n=21)
8030 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=575)
2119 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5359 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4283 Points ∼75% -20%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5480 Points ∼96% +2%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5718 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4127 Points ∼72% -23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3956 - 5765, n=20)
5110 Points ∼89% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=605)
2213 Points ∼39% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12667 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12694 Points ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12665 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7905 Points ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9536 Points ∼75% -25%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11956 - 13044, n=20)
12723 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 22052, n=605)
3148 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9721 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8823 Points ∼90% -9%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9807 Points ∼100% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7286 Points ∼74% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7385 Points ∼75% -24%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8499 - 10090, n=20)
9540 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=605)
2584 Points ∼26% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4938 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4895 Points ∼98% -1%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4987 Points ∼100% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4971 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4052 Points ∼81% -18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4038 Points ∼81% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4582 - 5209, n=20)
4941 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=654)
2168 Points ∼43% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7854 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8299 Points ∼100% +6%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8106 Points ∼98% +3%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6465 Points ∼78% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8156 Points ∼98% +4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6088 Points ∼73% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (6500 - 9167, n=20)
8128 Points ∼98% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=654)
1911 Points ∼23% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6943 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7157 Points ∼100% +3%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7117 Points ∼99% +3%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6060 Points ∼85% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6658 Points ∼93% -4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5471 Points ∼76% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5996 - 7653, n=21)
7103 Points ∼99% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=655)
1813 Points ∼25% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4958 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4729 Points ∼95% -5%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4928 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4975 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3846 Points ∼77% -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3839 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3965 - 5274, n=20)
4844 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5301, n=696)
2041 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11175 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12394 Points ∼100% +11%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11371 Points ∼92% +2%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7499 Points ∼61% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9480 Points ∼76% -15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
11302 Points ∼91% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (10599 - 13305, n=20)
11750 Points ∼95% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=695)
2551 Points ∼21% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8740 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9123 Points ∼100% +4%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8811 Points ∼97% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6739 Points ∼74% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7152 Points ∼78% -18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
7893 Points ∼87% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8215 - 9611, n=20)
8915 Points ∼98% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=698)
2177 Points ∼24% -75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
28603 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
32384 Points ∼69% +13%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
32240 Points ∼69% +13%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
46731 Points ∼100% +63%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
39724 Points ∼85% +39%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33898 Points ∼73% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (17817 - 58293, n=19)
34885 Points ∼75% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=840)
15967 Points ∼34% -44%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
143643 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
150281 Points ∼73% +5%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
149017 Points ∼72% +4%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
82652 Points ∼40% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
84533 Points ∼41% -41%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
206190 Points ∼100% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (110875 - 154375, n=19)
145987 Points ∼71% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 224130, n=838)
29192 Points ∼14% -80%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
75850 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
82937 Points ∼86% +9%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
82562 Points ∼85% +9%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
70593 Points ∼73% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
67590 Points ∼70% -11%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
96826 Points ∼100% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (56045 - 112989, n=19)
83547 Points ∼86% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=838)
22297 Points ∼23% -71%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
203 fps ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
203 fps ∼71% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
206 fps ∼72% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼53% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
145 fps ∼51% -29%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
287 fps ∼100% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (168 - 209, n=21)
203 fps ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=834)
48.7 fps ∼17% -76%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼55%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼82% +50%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼55% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼55% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
110 fps ∼100% +83%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼54% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (50 - 138, n=21)
76.9 fps ∼70% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 142, n=843)
32.5 fps ∼30% -46%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
123 fps ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
122 fps ∼78% -1%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
126 fps ∼80% +2%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
118 fps ∼75% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
96 fps ∼61% -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
157 fps ∼100% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (96 - 130, n=21)
122 fps ∼78% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=739)
28.9 fps ∼18% -77%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼98% +47%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
59 fps ∼66% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
90 fps ∼100% +50%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (50 - 111, n=21)
72.9 fps ∼81% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 117, n=747)
23.8 fps ∼26% -60%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps ∼86% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps ∼88% +2%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75 fps ∼75% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
65 fps ∼65% -24%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
100 fps ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (67 - 90, n=22)
85.1 fps ∼85% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=602)
23.1 fps ∼23% -73%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
59 fps ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
77 fps ∼100% +31%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼78% +2%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
52 fps ∼68% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
61 fps ∼79% +3%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼78% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (43 - 83, n=22)
60.8 fps ∼79% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=604)
20.6 fps ∼27% -65%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
27 fps ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
30 fps ∼65% +11%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps ∼67% +15%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
23 fps ∼50% -15%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
34 fps ∼74% +26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
46 fps ∼100% +70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (18 - 32, n=23)
27.7 fps ∼60% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=364)
11.8 fps ∼26% -56%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼69% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼69% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼66% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
22 fps ∼76% +10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼100% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (20 - 21, n=23)
20.2 fps ∼70% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=362)
8.26 fps ∼28% -59%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
42 fps ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps ∼81% +12%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
48 fps ∼83% +14%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
36 fps ∼62% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
49 fps ∼84% +17%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
58 fps ∼100% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (28 - 53, n=23)
43.2 fps ∼74% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=368)
17.7 fps ∼31% -58%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
53 fps ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
54 (20min) fps ∼72% +2%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps ∼72% +2%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
50 fps ∼67% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
43 fps ∼57% -19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (27 - 56, n=23)
52 fps ∼69% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=368)
20.2 fps ∼27% -62%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
51 fps ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps ∼79% -2%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼81% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
44 fps ∼70% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
38 fps ∼60% -25%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (39 - 54, n=22)
50.5 fps ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=527)
15.4 fps ∼24% -70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
39 fps ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
45 fps ∼94% +15%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
45 fps ∼94% +15%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31 fps ∼65% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
34 fps ∼71% -13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps ∼100% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (25 - 48, n=22)
40.5 fps ∼84% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=531)
13.6 fps ∼28% -65%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
538107 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
595466 Points ∼100% +11%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
585231 Points ∼98% +9%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
496966 Points ∼83% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
527820 Points ∼89% -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
510245 Points ∼86% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (527301 - 607937, n=22)
578062 Points ∼97% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 624727, n=152)
325323 Points ∼55% -40%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1387 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1514 Points ∼87% +9%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1496 Points ∼86% +8%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1629 Points ∼93% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
1439 Points ∼82% +4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1745 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1276 - 2169, n=21)
1504 Points ∼86% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 2169, n=764)
843 Points ∼48% -39%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11399 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11567 Points ∼68% +1%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11842 Points ∼70% +4%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10138 Points ∼60% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10646 Points ∼63% -7%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
16996 Points ∼100% +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11399 - 12073, n=21)
11701 Points ∼69% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=764)
2615 Points ∼15% -77%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7356 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7945 Points ∼100% +8%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7240 Points ∼91% -2%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6038 Points ∼76% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3811 Points ∼48% -48%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2350 Points ∼30% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5304 - 8874, n=21)
7103 Points ∼89% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=764)
1976 Points ∼25% -73%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9973 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10002 Points ∼70% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10058 Points ∼71% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9782 Points ∼69% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9024 Points ∼64% -10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
14189 Points ∼100% +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8421 - 10147, n=21)
9721 Points ∼69% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=764)
3587 Points ∼25% -64%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5835 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6072 Points ∼100% +4%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5993 Points ∼99% +3%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5589 Points ∼92% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4791 Points ∼79% -18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5607 Points ∼92% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5264 - 6402, n=21)
5885 Points ∼97% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6402, n=764)
1844 Points ∼30% -68%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
129.096 Points ∼100% +93%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
69.956 Points ∼54% +5%
Sony Xperia 1 II (Chrome 85)
66.937 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
64.958 Points ∼50% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=19)
63.5 Points ∼49% -5%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
63.374 Points ∼49% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
56.788 Points ∼44% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=226)
42.9 Points ∼33% -36%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
301.91 Points ∼100% +160%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
116.61 Points ∼39% +1%
Sony Xperia 1 II (Chrome 85)
115.95 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
115.43 Points ∼38% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
114.78 Points ∼38% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 126, n=19)
111 Points ∼37% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
96.234 Points ∼32% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=659)
50.4 Points ∼17% -57%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
153 runs/min ∼100% +117%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
71.8 runs/min ∼47% +2%
Sony Xperia 1 II (Chrome 85)
70.5 runs/min ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
68.6 runs/min ∼45% -3%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chome 80)
67.7 runs/min ∼44% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=18)
63.8 runs/min ∼42% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=205)
45.2 runs/min ∼30% -36%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
181 Points ∼100% +87%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=21)
106 Points ∼59% +9%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
104 Points ∼57% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
102 Points ∼56% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
101 Points ∼56% +4%
Sony Xperia 1 II (Chrome 85)
97 Points ∼54%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=297)
71.1 Points ∼39% -27%
Huawei P40 Pro
Points ∼0% -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
49388 Points ∼100% +108%
Sony Xperia 1 II (Chrome 85)
23762 Points ∼48%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
23690 Points ∼48% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
23678 Points ∼48% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
22834 Points ∼46% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 24467, n=21)
22024 Points ∼45% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
19695 Points ∼40% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=829)
8416 Points ∼17% -65%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=855)
9488 ms * ∼100% -362%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
2295.8 ms * ∼24% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1839 - 2911, n=22)
2054 ms * ∼22% -0%
Sony Xperia 1 II (Chrome 85)
2053 ms * ∼22%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
2021.2 ms * ∼21% +2%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
1944.7 ms * ∼20% +5%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
1913.7 ms * ∼20% +7%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
570.9 ms * ∼6% +72%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Sony Xperia 1 IIXiaomi Mi 10 ProOnePlus 8 ProHuawei P40 ProSamsung Galaxy Note20 UltraAverage 256 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
45%
27%
57%
51%
42%
-20%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
30.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
68.13 (Nano Memory Card)
122%
55.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
81%
59.8 (30.7 - 71.7, n=5)
95%
51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564)
68%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
34.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.32 (Nano Memory Card)
137%
65.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
89%
70.6 (34.7 - 82.5, n=5)
103%
69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564)
100%
Random Write 4KB
181.46
258.54
42%
197.7
9%
271.83
50%
217.74
20%
184 (24.8 - 272, n=20)
1%
40.3 (0.14 - 319, n=934)
-78%
Random Read 4KB
196.42
264.9
35%
208.3
6%
228.06
16%
186.67
-5%
208 (169 - 265, n=20)
6%
63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=934)
-68%
Sequential Write 256KB
396.4
750.44
89%
730.4
84%
395.74
0%
802.09
102%
546 (387 - 756, n=20)
38%
139 (2.99 - 1321, n=934)
-65%
Sequential Read 256KB
1511.92
1738.65
15%
1627.3
8%
1774.68
17%
1782.3
18%
1603 (1398 - 1789, n=20)
6%
363 (12.1 - 2037, n=934)
-76%
010203040506070Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.9 (57-61)
; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.8 (53-61)
; Arena of Valor; min: Ø60.1 (60-61)
; Arena of Valor; high HD: Ø59.9 (57-61)
 44.1 °C42.8 °C41.5 °C 
 44.8 °C42.3 °C41.7 °C 
 44.4 °C43 °C40.6 °C 
Maximum: 44.8 °C
Moyenne: 42.8 °C
36.7 °C40.9 °C41.5 °C
35.8 °C40.9 °C43.6 °C
36.7 °C41 °C42.9 °C
Maximum: 43.6 °C
Moyenne: 40 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  42 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.743.42537.337.23129.229.94032.435.2503236.26323.624.48021.719.610021.921.712522.526.216018.533.720014.837.625012.346.531512.553.840011.960.450013.166.563014.570.580018.765.4100019.366.3125018.267.7160016.464.3200014.365.5250014.967.8315014.669400015.465500016.164.8630016.766.4800017.762.71000018.662.91250019.458.11600020.349.1SPL56.366.463.728.778.3N10.719.118.1143.5median 16.4median 64.3Delta2.39.332.239.436.225.529.126.83027.742.342.426.827.220.325.22536.717.244.817.954.317.153.817.95316.253.616.55615.35915.664.415.664.814.867.214.472.314.67314.776.914.176.414.476.914.475.914.973.514.773.814.57214.866.6156316.649.427.185.80.961median 15median 64.81.29.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSony Xperia 1 IIApple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Sony Xperia 1 II audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.2 / 0.3 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 1.7 / 2.3 / 2.9 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 7.2 / 10.6 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia 1 II
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 8 Pro
4510 mAh
Huawei P40 Pro
4200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
46%
-12%
45%
40%
22%
20%
37%
Idle Minimum *
1.7
0.61
64%
2.2
-29%
0.92
46%
0.65
62%
0.92
46%
1.134 (0.52 - 2.2, n=20)
33%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=926)
48%
Idle Average *
2.3
1.19
48%
3.3
-43%
1.41
39%
1.06
54%
2.9
-26%
2.07 (1.19 - 3.43, n=20)
10%
1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=925)
24%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
1.23
58%
3.7
-28%
1.47
49%
1.49
49%
2.94
-1%
2.3 (1.23 - 4, n=20)
21%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=926)
30%
Load Average *
7.2
4.18
42%
5.9
18%
3.35
53%
4.91
32%
3.65
49%
5.24 (3.5 - 7.4, n=20)
27%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=920)
43%
Load Maximum *
10.6
8.53
20%
8.3
22%
6.37
40%
10.29
3%
6.18
42%
9.73 (7.67 - 12.3, n=20)
8%
6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=920)
42%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
21h 35min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
7h 47min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
13h 01min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
3h 15min
Sony Xperia 1 II
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 8 Pro
4510 mAh
Huawei P40 Pro
4200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
44%
61%
30%
33%
95%
Reader / Idle
1295
2133
65%
2103
62%
1474
14%
1223
-6%
2618
102%
H.264
781
973
25%
1023
31%
1137
46%
993
27%
1346
72%
WiFi v1.3
467
865
85%
923
98%
743
59%
644
38%
909
95%
Load
195
198
2%
296
52%
198
2%
338
73%
408
109%

Points positifs

+ logiciel photo professionnel
+ qualité de construction
+ certification IP65/68 contre l'eau et la poussière
+ nano SIM et micro SD accessibles sans outil

Points négatifs

- autonomie en Wifi
- vitesse du lecteur de carte SD
- prix

Verdict - Véritable appareil photo

En test : le Sony Xperia 1 II. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par cyberport.
En test : le Sony Xperia 1 II. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par cyberport.

Sony colle à son ration habituel 21/9 avec le Xperia 1 II. Ce n'est pas un défaut, et l'appareil est assez bon pour un appareil premium. Les appareils photo ne sont utilisé au mieux qu'avec le logiciel professionnel de Sony. Les utilisateurs lambdas peuvent malgré tout utiliser l'appli classique, qui propose moins de fonctionnalités. Le reste des composants est similaire à ceux des autres appareils de cette gamme de prix - mais les concurrents parviennent à être plus performants.

Le Sony Xperia 1 II est bien adapté aux photographes professionnels, qui pourront exploiter les applis professionnelles incluses. Pour les autres, le prix du smartphone Sony est tout simplement trop élevé.

La mauvaise autonomie déçoit particulièrement. Certes, l'écran est gros et consomme beaucoup. Mais des concurrents avec de plus petites batteries font mieux. Le lecteur de carte SD est également lent. Et le stockage interne n'est pas non plus très rapide. Ceux qui utiliseront l'appli photo professionnelle seront satisfaits de leur achat, tant qu'ils n'utilisent pas de carte micro SD pour stocker leurs images.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Sony Xperia 1 II - 09/13/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Châssis
86%
Clavier
66 / 75 → 88%
Dispositif de pointage
94%
Connectivité
50 / 70 → 72%
Poids
90%
Autonomie
84%
Écran
87%
Performances en jeu
61 / 64 → 95%
Performances dans les applications
81 / 86 → 94%
Chauffe
84%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 82%
Appareil photo
70%
Moyenne
79%
85%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Sony Xperia 1 II : le fleuron à l'appareil photo de référence
Mike Wobker, 2020-10- 2 (Update: 2020-10- 2)