Test du Sony Xperia 1 II : le fleuron à l'appareil photo de référence

Name: Sony Xperia 1 II
Brand: Sony

Plus belles images avec un logiciel professionnel. Le Sony Xperia 1 II est équipé de l'appli Cinema Pro, déjà vue dans d'autres smartphones de Sony, et d'une nouvelle appli d'appareil photo. Elle donne au Xperia des fonctionnalités trouvées dans les appareils photo DSLR de Sony, ce qui va séduire les fans de photo. Lisez notre rapport de test pour découvrir si le smartphone à 1 200 € est assez bon au quotidien pour justifier son prix.

Mike Wobker, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduit par Prévots), 10/02/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Smartphone Touchscreen Android

Exemplaire de test fourni par Cyberport

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Sony Xperia 1 II (Xperia Gamme)

Processeur

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)

Carte graphique

Qualcomm Adreno 650

Mémoire

8192 Mo

Écran

6.50 pouces 21:9, 3840 x 1644 pixel 643 PPP, capacitif, OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, brillant: oui, HDR

Disque dur

256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 Go

, 236 Go libres

Connexions

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, USB C, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD (jusqu'à 1 To), 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, gyroscope, capteur de proximité, baromètre, e-boussole, USB C

Réseau

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G GSM GPRS / EDGE (850 / 900 / 1 800 / 1 900), 3G UMTS / HSPA+ (1 / 2 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 8 / 19), 4G LTE Cat19 / Cat13 (1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 7 / 8 / 12 / 13 / 17 / 19 / 20 / 25 / 26 / 28 / 29 / 32 / 34 / 38 / 39 / 40 / 41 / 46 / 66), 5G (n1 / n3 / n28 / n77 / , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Taille

Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 7.6 x 165.1 x 71.1

Batterie

4000 mAh Lithium-Polymère

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Système d'exploitation

Android 10

Appareil photo

Appareil photo primaire: 12 MPix (f/1,7, 24 mm, 1/1,7") + 12 MP (zoom optique x3, f/2,4, 70 mm, 1/3,4", 1,0 µm) + 12 MP (f/2,2, 16 mm, 1/2,55") + 0,3 MP (TOF 3D)
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix f/2,0, 24 mm, 1/4", 1,12 µm

Fonctionnalités additionnelles

Haut-parleurs: 2 haut-parleurs, stéréos, Clavier: virtuel, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, adaptateur secteur USB, câble USB C, écouteurs stéréos avec prise 3,5 mm, Xperia Assist, Cinema Pro, Photo Pro, 24 Mois Garantie, DAS (tête) : 1,12 W/kg, DAS (corps) : 0,67 W/kg, waterproof

Poids

181.4 g, Alimentation: 69 g

Prix

1200 euros

Liens

Sony Page d'accueil
Sony Section dédiée aux ordinateurs portables

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

voir toutes les spécifications

Appareils du comparatif

Note	Date	Modèle	Poids	Drive	Taille	Résolution
85 %	10/20	Sony Xperia 1 II SD 865, Adreno 650	181.4 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.50"	3840x1644
88 %	05/20	Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650	208 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.67"	2340x1080
88 %	05/20	OnePlus 8 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650	199 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.78"	3168x1440
89 %	05/20	Huawei P40 Pro Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16	209 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.58"	2640x1200
89 %	09/20	Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11	208 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.90"	3088x1440
87 %	11/19	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU	226 g	64 GB SSD	6.50"	2688x1242

Comparaison des tailles

OnePlus 8 Pro Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Sony Xperia 1 II Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Huawei P40 Pro Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max ❌

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	883 (834^min - 919^max) MBit/s ∼100% +18%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	870 (841^min - 882^max) MBit/s ∼99% +16%
OnePlus 8 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	831 (745^min - 872^max) MBit/s ∼94% +11%
Huawei P40 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	821 (388^min - 998^max) MBit/s ∼93% +10%
Sony Xperia 1 II Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	748 (550^min - 820^max) MBit/s ∼85%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	580 (550^min - 597^max) MBit/s ∼66% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1414, n=641)	290 MBit/s ∼33% -61%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P40 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1544 (797^min - 1619^max) MBit/s ∼100% +76%
OnePlus 8 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	876 (767^min - 904^max) MBit/s ∼57% 0%
Sony Xperia 1 II Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	875 (787^min - 899^max) MBit/s ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	816 (403^min - 832^max) MBit/s ∼53% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	772 (691^min - 832^max) MBit/s ∼50% -12%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	589 (461^min - 625^max) MBit/s ∼38% -33%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 1599, n=641)	276 MBit/s ∼18% -68%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø748 (550-820)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø875 (787-899)

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Main camera Wide-angle Cityscape Low-light photography

Cliquer pour charger les images

Sony Xperia 1 II

Canon EOS 600 D

OnePlus 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Cliquer pour charger les images

Sony Xperia 1 II

Canon EOS 600 D

OnePlus 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Cliquer pour charger les images

Sony Xperia 1 II

Canon EOS 600 D

OnePlus 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Cliquer pour charger les images

Sony Xperia 1 II

Canon EOS 600 D

OnePlus 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

ColorChecker Sony Xperia 1 II: 29.98 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 40.35 ∆E

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck.biz/Test-du-Sony-Xperia-1-II-le-fleuron-a-l-appareil-photo-de-reference.494911.0.html">Sony Xperia 1 II</a> — Sony Xperia 1 II


544 cd/m²	557 cd/m²	580 cd/m²
545 cd/m²	557 cd/m²	580 cd/m²
550 cd/m²	555 cd/m²	579 cd/m²

Homogénéité de la luminosité

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 580 cd/m² Moyenne: 560.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.1 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 94 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 557 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.86 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
123.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.171

	Sony Xperia 1 II OLED, 3840x1644, 6.50	Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67	OnePlus 8 Pro AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.78	Huawei P40 Pro OLED, 2640x1200, 6.58	Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.90	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.50
Screen		48%	53%	34%	11%	42%
Brightness middle	557	753 35%	796 43%	584 5%	860 54%	790 42%
Brightness	561	762 36%	779 39%	576 3%	878 57%	790 41%
Brightness Distribution	94	96 2%	94 0%	95 1%	96 2%	97 3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	2.86	0.9 69%	0.68 76%	1.1 62%	4.5 -57%	1.4 51%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	7.29	1.6 78%	1.55 79%	2.3 68%	10.4 -43%	3.4 53%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	5	1.5 70%	1.1 78%	1.8 64%	2.4 52%	1.9 62%
Gamma	2.171 ^101%	2.24 ^98%	2.237 ^98%	2.16 ^102%	2 ^110%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6993 ^93%	6415 ^101%	6310 ^103%	6355 ^102%	6466 ^101%	6466 ^101%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé

240.4 Hz

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 240.4 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) .

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 240.4 Hz est relativement faible, les personnes les plus sensibles devraient percevoir un scintillement et être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire accrue (avec le niveau de luminosité indiqué)

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9725 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.

↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc
9 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 5 ms hausse
9 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 4 ms chute
L'écran montre de faibles temps de réponse, un bon écran pour jouer. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 3 ms hausse
6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 3 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.7 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3129 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	5532 Points ∼100% +77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2896 - 3310, n=13)	3153 Points ∼57% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (255 - 5532, n=64)	1852 Points ∼33% -41%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	2893 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	4789 Points ∼100% +66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2634 - 3665, n=13)	3077 Points ∼64% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (72 - 4789, n=67)	1634 Points ∼34% -44%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3290 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3338 Points ∼96% +1%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3318 Points ∼95% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3165 Points ∼91% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	2787 Points ∼80% -15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3476 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2687 - 3449, n=21)	3273 Points ∼94% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (421 - 4201, n=165)	1959 Points ∼56% -40%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	898 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	906 Points ∼68% +1%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	909 Points ∼69% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	779 Points ∼59% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	940 Points ∼71% +5%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	1326 Points ∼100% +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (764 - 924, n=21)	903 Points ∼68% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (124 - 1604, n=165)	567 Points ∼43% -37%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9762 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	10952 Points ∼93% +12%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11153 Points ∼95% +14%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	11341 Points ∼96% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	11784 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (9202 - 15299, n=22)	11268 Points ∼96% +15%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=564)	6088 Points ∼52% -38%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12356 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	13142 Points ∼90% +6%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13471 Points ∼93% +9%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	14352 Points ∼99% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	14551 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (10990 - 19989, n=21)	13586 Points ∼93% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 19989, n=714)	6701 Points ∼46% -46%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3863 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3830 Points ∼94% -1%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3888 Points ∼96% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4057 Points ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	3122 Points ∼77% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1786 - 4061, n=19)	3414 Points ∼84% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (1740 - 4061, n=218)	2638 Points ∼65% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8064 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8173 Points ∼99% +1%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8279 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6360 Points ∼77% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	6378 Points ∼77% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7618 - 9104, n=19)	8249 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (203 - 11259, n=218)	3023 Points ∼37% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	6495 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	6578 Points ∼99% +1%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6618 Points ∼100% +2%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5648 Points ∼85% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	5178 Points ∼78% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4582 - 6961, n=20)	6202 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (253 - 6977, n=218)	2666 Points ∼40% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5354 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5277 Points ∼92% -1%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5506 Points ∼96% +3%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5728 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	4273 Points ∼75% -20%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4957 - 5780, n=20)	5344 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 5780, n=574)	2295 Points ∼40% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9380 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9356 Points ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9379 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6771 Points ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	8239 Points ∼88% -12%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8633 - 9567, n=20)	9380 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 12146, n=574)	2295 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8037 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7986 Points ∼98% -1%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8111 Points ∼100% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6508 Points ∼80% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	6830 Points ∼84% -15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7517 - 8269, n=21)	8030 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 9643, n=575)	2119 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5359 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4283 Points ∼75% -20%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5480 Points ∼96% +2%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5718 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	4127 Points ∼72% -23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3956 - 5765, n=20)	5110 Points ∼89% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 5765, n=605)	2213 Points ∼39% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12667 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12694 Points ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12665 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7905 Points ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	9536 Points ∼75% -25%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (11956 - 13044, n=20)	12723 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 22052, n=605)	3148 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9721 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8823 Points ∼90% -9%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9807 Points ∼100% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7286 Points ∼74% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	7385 Points ∼75% -24%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8499 - 10090, n=20)	9540 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (88 - 11895, n=605)	2584 Points ∼26% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4938 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4895 Points ∼98% -1%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4987 Points ∼100% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4971 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	4052 Points ∼81% -18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	4038 Points ∼81% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4582 - 5209, n=20)	4941 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (435 - 5318, n=654)	2168 Points ∼43% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7854 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8299 Points ∼100% +6%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8106 Points ∼98% +3%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6465 Points ∼78% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	8156 Points ∼98% +4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	6088 Points ∼73% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (6500 - 9167, n=20)	8128 Points ∼98% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 11573, n=654)	1911 Points ∼23% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	6943 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7157 Points ∼100% +3%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7117 Points ∼99% +3%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6060 Points ∼85% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	6658 Points ∼93% -4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	5471 Points ∼76% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5996 - 7653, n=21)	7103 Points ∼99% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 9138, n=655)	1813 Points ∼25% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4958 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4729 Points ∼95% -5%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4928 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4975 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	3846 Points ∼77% -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3839 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3965 - 5274, n=20)	4844 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 5301, n=696)	2041 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11175 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12394 Points ∼100% +11%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11371 Points ∼92% +2%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7499 Points ∼61% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	9480 Points ∼76% -15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	11302 Points ∼91% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (10599 - 13305, n=20)	11750 Points ∼95% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 16670, n=695)	2551 Points ∼21% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8740 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9123 Points ∼100% +4%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8811 Points ∼97% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6739 Points ∼74% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	7152 Points ∼78% -18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	7893 Points ∼87% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8215 - 9611, n=20)	8915 Points ∼98% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 11256, n=698)	2177 Points ∼24% -75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	28603 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	32384 Points ∼69% +13%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	32240 Points ∼69% +13%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	46731 Points ∼100% +63%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	39724 Points ∼85% +39%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	33898 Points ∼73% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (17817 - 58293, n=19)	34885 Points ∼75% +22%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 59268, n=840)	15967 Points ∼34% -44%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	143643 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	150281 Points ∼73% +5%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	149017 Points ∼72% +4%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	82652 Points ∼40% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	84533 Points ∼41% -41%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	206190 Points ∼100% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (110875 - 154375, n=19)	145987 Points ∼71% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 224130, n=838)	29192 Points ∼14% -80%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	75850 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	82937 Points ∼86% +9%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	82562 Points ∼85% +9%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	70593 Points ∼73% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	67590 Points ∼70% -11%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	96826 Points ∼100% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (56045 - 112989, n=19)	83547 Points ∼86% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 117606, n=838)	22297 Points ∼23% -71%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	203 fps ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	203 fps ∼71% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	206 fps ∼72% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	152 fps ∼53% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	145 fps ∼51% -29%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	287 fps ∼100% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (168 - 209, n=21)	203 fps ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=834)	48.7 fps ∼17% -76%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	60 fps ∼55%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	90 fps ∼82% +50%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps ∼55% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	60 fps ∼55% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	110 fps ∼100% +83%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	59 fps ∼54% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 138, n=21)	76.9 fps ∼70% +28%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 142, n=843)	32.5 fps ∼30% -46%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	123 fps ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	122 fps ∼78% -1%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	126 fps ∼80% +2%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	118 fps ∼75% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	96 fps ∼61% -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	157 fps ∼100% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (96 - 130, n=21)	122 fps ∼78% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 180, n=739)	28.9 fps ∼18% -77%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	60 fps ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	88 fps ∼98% +47%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps ∼67% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	59 fps ∼66% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	90 fps ∼100% +50%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps ∼67% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 111, n=21)	72.9 fps ∼81% +22%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 117, n=747)	23.8 fps ∼26% -60%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	86 fps ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	86 fps ∼86% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	88 fps ∼88% +2%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	75 fps ∼75% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	65 fps ∼65% -24%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	100 fps ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (67 - 90, n=22)	85.1 fps ∼85% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=602)	23.1 fps ∼23% -73%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	59 fps ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	77 fps ∼100% +31%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps ∼78% +2%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	52 fps ∼68% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	61 fps ∼79% +3%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps ∼78% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (43 - 83, n=22)	60.8 fps ∼79% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=604)	20.6 fps ∼27% -65%

GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	27 fps ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	30 fps ∼65% +11%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	31 fps ∼67% +15%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	23 fps ∼50% -15%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	34 fps ∼74% +26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	46 fps ∼100% +70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (18 - 32, n=23)	27.7 fps ∼60% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 60, n=364)	11.8 fps ∼26% -56%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	20 fps ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	20 fps ∼69% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	20 fps ∼69% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	19 fps ∼66% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	22 fps ∼76% +10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	29 fps ∼100% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (20 - 21, n=23)	20.2 fps ∼70% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 101, n=362)	8.26 fps ∼28% -59%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	42 fps ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	47 fps ∼81% +12%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	48 fps ∼83% +14%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	36 fps ∼62% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	49 fps ∼84% +17%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	58 fps ∼100% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (28 - 53, n=23)	43.2 fps ∼74% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 60, n=368)	17.7 fps ∼31% -58%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	53 fps ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	54 (20^min) fps ∼72% +2%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	54 fps ∼72% +2%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	50 fps ∼67% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	43 fps ∼57% -19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	75 fps ∼100% +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (27 - 56, n=23)	52 fps ∼69% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 257, n=368)	20.2 fps ∼27% -62%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	51 fps ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	50 fps ∼79% -2%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	51 fps ∼81% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	44 fps ∼70% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	38 fps ∼60% -25%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	63 fps ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (39 - 54, n=22)	50.5 fps ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 75, n=527)	15.4 fps ∼24% -70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	39 fps ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	45 fps ∼94% +15%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	45 fps ∼94% +15%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	31 fps ∼65% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	34 fps ∼71% -13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	48 fps ∼100% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (25 - 48, n=22)	40.5 fps ∼84% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=531)	13.6 fps ∼28% -65%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	538107 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	595466 Points ∼100% +11%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	585231 Points ∼98% +9%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	496966 Points ∼83% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	527820 Points ∼89% -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	510245 Points ∼86% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (527301 - 607937, n=22)	578062 Points ∼97% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (53335 - 624727, n=152)	325323 Points ∼55% -40%

BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	1387 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	1514 Points ∼87% +9%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	1496 Points ∼86% +8%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	1629 Points ∼93% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	1439 Points ∼82% +4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	1745 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1276 - 2169, n=21)	1504 Points ∼86% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 2169, n=764)	843 Points ∼48% -39%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11399 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11567 Points ∼68% +1%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11842 Points ∼70% +4%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	10138 Points ∼60% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	10646 Points ∼63% -7%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	16996 Points ∼100% +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (11399 - 12073, n=21)	11701 Points ∼69% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 16996, n=764)	2615 Points ∼15% -77%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7356 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7945 Points ∼100% +8%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7240 Points ∼91% -2%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6038 Points ∼76% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	3811 Points ∼48% -48%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	2350 Points ∼30% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5304 - 8874, n=21)	7103 Points ∼89% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 8874, n=764)	1976 Points ∼25% -73%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9973 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	10002 Points ∼70% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	10058 Points ∼71% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	9782 Points ∼69% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	9024 Points ∼64% -10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	14189 Points ∼100% +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8421 - 10147, n=21)	9721 Points ∼69% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 14189, n=764)	3587 Points ∼25% -64%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 1 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5835 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	6072 Points ∼100% +4%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5993 Points ∼99% +3%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5589 Points ∼92% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	4791 Points ∼79% -18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	5607 Points ∼92% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5264 - 6402, n=21)	5885 Points ∼97% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6402, n=764)	1844 Points ∼30% -68%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	129.096 Points ∼100% +93%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)	69.956 Points ∼54% +5%
Sony Xperia 1 II (Chrome 85)	66.937 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)	64.958 Points ∼50% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=19)	63.5 Points ∼49% -5%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)	63.374 Points ∼49% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)	56.788 Points ∼44% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=226)	42.9 Points ∼33% -36%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	301.91 Points ∼100% +160%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)	116.61 Points ∼39% +1%
Sony Xperia 1 II (Chrome 85)	115.95 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)	115.43 Points ∼38% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)	114.78 Points ∼38% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 126, n=19)	111 Points ∼37% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)	96.234 Points ∼32% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=659)	50.4 Points ∼17% -57%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	153 runs/min ∼100% +117%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)	71.8 runs/min ∼47% +2%
Sony Xperia 1 II (Chrome 85)	70.5 runs/min ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)	68.6 runs/min ∼45% -3%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chome 80)	67.7 runs/min ∼44% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=18)	63.8 runs/min ∼42% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=205)	45.2 runs/min ∼30% -36%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	181 Points ∼100% +87%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=21)	106 Points ∼59% +9%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)	104 Points ∼57% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)	102 Points ∼56% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)	101 Points ∼56% +4%
Sony Xperia 1 II (Chrome 85)	97 Points ∼54%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=297)	71.1 Points ∼39% -27%
Huawei P40 Pro	Points ∼0% -100%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	49388 Points ∼100% +108%
Sony Xperia 1 II (Chrome 85)	23762 Points ∼48%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)	23690 Points ∼48% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)	23678 Points ∼48% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)	22834 Points ∼46% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 24467, n=21)	22024 Points ∼45% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)	19695 Points ∼40% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=829)	8416 Points ∼17% -65%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=855)	9488 ms * ∼100% -362%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)	2295.8 ms * ∼24% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1839 - 2911, n=22)	2054 ms * ∼22% -0%
Sony Xperia 1 II (Chrome 85)	2053 ms * ∼22%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)	2021.2 ms * ∼21% +2%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)	1944.7 ms * ∼20% +5%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)	1913.7 ms * ∼20% +7%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	570.9 ms * ∼6% +72%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

	Sony Xperia 1 II	Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro	OnePlus 8 Pro	Huawei P40 Pro	Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra	Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		45%	27%	57%	51%	42%	-20%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	30.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)			68.13 (Nano Memory Card) 122%	55.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 81%	59.8 (30.7 - 71.7, n=5) 95%	51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564) 68%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	34.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)			82.32 (Nano Memory Card) 137%	65.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 89%	70.6 (34.7 - 82.5, n=5) 103%	69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564) 100%
Random Write 4KB	181.46	258.54 42%	197.7 9%	271.83 50%	217.74 20%	184 (24.8 - 272, n=20) 1%	40.3 (0.14 - 319, n=934) -78%
Random Read 4KB	196.42	264.9 35%	208.3 6%	228.06 16%	186.67 -5%	208 (169 - 265, n=20) 6%	63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=934) -68%
Sequential Write 256KB	396.4	750.44 89%	730.4 84%	395.74 0%	802.09 102%	546 (387 - 756, n=20) 38%	139 (2.99 - 1321, n=934) -65%
Sequential Read 256KB	1511.92	1738.65 15%	1627.3 8%	1774.68 17%	1782.3 18%	1603 (1398 - 1789, n=20) 6%	363 (12.1 - 2037, n=934) -76%

; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.9 (57-61)

; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.8 (53-61)

; Arena of Valor; min: Ø60.1 (60-61)

; Arena of Valor; high HD: Ø59.9 (57-61)

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge


44.1 °C	42.8 °C	41.5 °C
44.8 °C	42.3 °C	41.7 °C
44.4 °C	43 °C	40.6 °C

Maximum: 44.8 °C
Moyenne: 42.8 °C


36.7 °C	40.9 °C	41.5 °C
35.8 °C	40.9 °C	43.6 °C
36.7 °C	41 °C	42.9 °C

Maximum: 43.6 °C
Moyenne: 40 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 42 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Sony Xperia 1 II audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique

Éteint/en veille	0.2 / 0.3 Watts
Au repos	1.7 / 2.3 / 2.9 Watts
Fortement sollicité	7.2 / 10.6 Watts


Légende: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Sony Xperia 1 II 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 4500 mAh	OnePlus 8 Pro 4510 mAh	Huawei P40 Pro 4200 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 4500 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		46%	-12%	45%	40%	22%	20%	37%
Idle Minimum *	1.7	0.61 64%	2.2 -29%	0.92 46%	0.65 62%	0.92 46%	1.134 (0.52 - 2.2, n=20) 33%	0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=926) 48%
Idle Average *	2.3	1.19 48%	3.3 -43%	1.41 39%	1.06 54%	2.9 -26%	2.07 (1.19 - 3.43, n=20) 10%	1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=925) 24%
Idle Maximum *	2.9	1.23 58%	3.7 -28%	1.47 49%	1.49 49%	2.94 -1%	2.3 (1.23 - 4, n=20) 21%	2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=926) 30%
Load Average *	7.2	4.18 42%	5.9 18%	3.35 53%	4.91 32%	3.65 49%	5.24 (3.5 - 7.4, n=20) 27%	4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=920) 43%
Load Maximum *	10.6	8.53 20%	8.3 22%	6.37 40%	10.29 3%	6.18 42%	9.73 (7.67 - 12.3, n=20) 8%	6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=920) 42%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie

Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)		21h 35min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		7h 47min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p		13h 01min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)		3h 15min

	Sony Xperia 1 II 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 4500 mAh	OnePlus 8 Pro 4510 mAh	Huawei P40 Pro 4200 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 4500 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie		44%	61%	30%	33%	95%
Reader / Idle	1295	2133 65%	2103 62%	1474 14%	1223 -6%	2618 102%
H.264	781	973 25%	1023 31%	1137 46%	993 27%	1346 72%
WiFi v1.3	467	865 85%	923 98%	743 59%	644 38%	909 95%
Load	195	198 2%	296 52%	198 2%	338 73%	408 109%

Points positifs

+ logiciel photo professionnel

+ qualité de construction

+ certification IP65/68 contre l'eau et la poussière

+ nano SIM et micro SD accessibles sans outil

Points négatifs

- autonomie en Wifi

- vitesse du lecteur de carte SD

- prix

Verdict - Véritable appareil photo

En test : le Sony Xperia 1 II. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par cyberport.

Sony colle à son ration habituel 21/9 avec le Xperia 1 II. Ce n'est pas un défaut, et l'appareil est assez bon pour un appareil premium. Les appareils photo ne sont utilisé au mieux qu'avec le logiciel professionnel de Sony. Les utilisateurs lambdas peuvent malgré tout utiliser l'appli classique, qui propose moins de fonctionnalités. Le reste des composants est similaire à ceux des autres appareils de cette gamme de prix - mais les concurrents parviennent à être plus performants.

Le Sony Xperia 1 II est bien adapté aux photographes professionnels, qui pourront exploiter les applis professionnelles incluses. Pour les autres, le prix du smartphone Sony est tout simplement trop élevé.

La mauvaise autonomie déçoit particulièrement. Certes, l'écran est gros et consomme beaucoup. Mais des concurrents avec de plus petites batteries font mieux. Le lecteur de carte SD est également lent. Et le stockage interne n'est pas non plus très rapide. Ceux qui utiliseront l'appli photo professionnelle seront satisfaits de leur achat, tant qu'ils n'utilisent pas de carte micro SD pour stocker leurs images.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Sony Xperia 1 II - 2020-09-1309/13/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Châssis

86%

Clavier

66 / 75 → 88%

Dispositif de pointage

94%

Connectivité

50 / 70 → 72%

Poids

90%