Notebookcheck

Test du Huawei P40 Pro : appareil photo impressionnant

Succès ? Dans notre test, le Huawei P40 Pro s’avère être un sacré morceau, en particulier parce qu’il est équipé du meilleur appareil photo actuellement existant. Et nous n’en attendions pas moins ! Malheureusement le l’impossibilité d’utiliser les services Google rend une recommandation d’achat difficile. Lisez ce rapport de test pour voir quel type d’utilisateur peut choisir le smartphone Huawei, et quels défauts il faut prendre en compte.

Huawei P40 Pro (P40 Gamme)
Carte graphique
ARM Mali-G76 MP16
Mémoire
8192 Mo 
, LPDDR4x
Écran
6.58 pouces 19.8:9, 2640 x 1200 pixel 441 PPP, capacitif 10 points, OLED, encoche en goutte d'eau, brillant: oui, 90 Hz
Disque dur
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 Go 
, 239.58 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Connectique audio: USB C, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: nano (jusqu'à 256 Go), 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: capteur de proximité, capteur de gestes, capteur à effet Hall, gyroscope, accéléromètre, boussole, OTG, émetteur IR
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM / GPRS / Edge (850, 900, 1 800 et 1 900 MHz), UMTS / HSPA+ (bandes 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 et 19), LTE Cat. 20 (bandes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39 et 40), 5G (bandes N1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 et 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.95 x 158.2 x 72.6
Batterie
4200 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Android 10
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 50 MPix (lentille grand-angle classique, 1/1,28", 1,22 µm, f/1,9, filtre couleur RYYB, octa PDAF, OIS) + 40 MP (lentille vidéo ultra grand angle, 1/1,54", f/1,8, OIS) + 12 MP (5x zoom, f/3,4, RYYB, OIS) + 3D profondeur de champ ; API Camera2 : limité
Appareil photo secondaire: 32 MPix (autofocus, f/2,2) + IR
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, chargeur, câble USB, écouteurs, coque en silicone transparent, documentation, EMUI 10.1, applis Microsoft, 24 Mois Garantie, SIM Hybride + eSIM, IP68, fanless, waterproof
Poids
209 g
Prix
1049 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Appareils du comparatif

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Drive
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
89 %
05/20
Huawei P40 Pro
Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16
209 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.58"2640x1200
86 %
04/20
Oppo Find X2 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
202 g512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.7"3168x1440
89 %
03/20
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
219 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.9"3200x1440
88 %
12/19
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
188 g256 GB NVMe5.8"2436x1125
84 %
02/20
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
SD 730G, Adreno 618
208 g256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080

Comparaison des tailles

166.9 mm 76 mm 8.8 mm 219 g165.2 mm 74.4 mm 9.5 mm 202 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.7 mm 208 g158.2 mm 72.6 mm 8.95 mm 209 g144 mm 71.4 mm 8.1 mm 188 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
825 (min: 763, max: 855) MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
821 (min: 388, max: 998) MBit/s ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
754 (min: 346, max: 881) MBit/s ∼91% -8%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 256 GB NVMe
582 (min: 414, max: 625) MBit/s ∼71% -29%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 256 GB NVMe
522 (min: 272, max: 554) MBit/s ∼63% -36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
329 (min: 284, max: 350) MBit/s ∼40% -60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1368, n=530)
253 MBit/s ∼31% -69%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P40 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1544 (min: 797, max: 1619) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
818 (min: 425, max: 890) MBit/s ∼53% -47%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 256 GB NVMe
557 (min: 439, max: 614) MBit/s ∼36% -64%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 256 GB NVMe
489 (min: 254, max: 634) MBit/s ∼32% -68%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
509 (min: 264, max: 571) MBit/s ∼33% -67%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 (min: 306, max: 319) MBit/s ∼20% -80%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1544, n=530)
238 MBit/s ∼15% -85%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320133013401350136013701380139014001410142014301440145014601470148014901500151015201530154015501560157015801590160016101620Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø808 (388-998)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1517 (797-1619)
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Lake
Garmin Edge 500 - Lake
Garmin Edge 500 - Turn
Garmin Edge 500 - Turn
Huawei P40 Pro - Overview
Huawei P40 Pro - Overview
Huawei P40 Pro - Lake
Huawei P40 Pro - Lake
Huawei P40 Pro - Turn
Huawei P40 Pro - Turn
iPhone 11 Pro
Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mi 10 Pro
iPhone 11 Pro
Galaxy S20 Ultra
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mi 10 Pro

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3Scene 4
Standard wide-angle
Ultra wide-angle
Standard wide-angle
Standard wide-angle
Ultra wide-angle
Standard wide-angle
Standard wide-angle
Standard wide-angle
Standard wide-angle
ColorChecker
8.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
11 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
15 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei P40 Pro: 11.63 ∆E min: 4.31 - max: 16.27 ∆E
ColorChecker
17.8 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei P40 Pro: 10.6 ∆E min: 1.67 - max: 22.46 ∆E
577
cd/m²
570
cd/m²
560
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
584
cd/m²
569
cd/m²
587
cd/m²
581
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 587 cd/m² Moyenne: 575.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.93 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 95 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 584 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Huawei P40 Pro
OLED, 2640x1200, 6.58
Huawei P30 Pro
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3200x1440, 6.9
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
OLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Oppo Find X2 Pro
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.7
Screen
-24%
-64%
12%
-116%
-120%
Brightness middle
584
597
2%
734
26%
787
35%
579
-1%
778
33%
Brightness
576
608
6%
748
30%
793
38%
576
0%
775
35%
Brightness Distribution
95
89
-6%
95
0%
98
3%
89
-6%
99
4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.1
2.2
-100%
3.2
-191%
1.2
-9%
4.61
-319%
4.4
-300%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.3
3.6
-57%
6.8
-196%
2.6
-13%
7.72
-236%
8.7
-278%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.8
1.6
11%
2.7
-50%
1.5
17%
4.2
-133%
5.6
-211%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.23 99%
2.11 104%
2.2 100%
2.244 98%
2.26 97%
CCT
6355 102%
6268 104%
6299 103%
6339 103%
7201 90%
7250 90%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 365 Hz ≤ 99 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 365 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 99 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 365 Hz est relativement élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevLa fréquence de rafraîchissement de 365 Hz est relativement élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.oir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue. Néanmoins certaines personnes pourront toujours percevoir un scintillement.

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 18254 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
2.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 1.6 ms hausse
↘ 1.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
3.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 2 ms hausse
↘ 1.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (39.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5.1
Metal Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6326 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4558 - 6333, n=3)
5739 Points ∼91%
Vulkan Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3979 Points ∼98%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2641 Points ∼65% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3804 Points ∼94% -4%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
2983 Points ∼74% -25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4043 Points ∼100% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (2693 - 3979, n=3)
3143 Points ∼78% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 4043, n=47)
1710 Points ∼42% -57%
OpenCL Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4511 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2960 Points ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3346 Points ∼74% -26%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4491 Points ∼100% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3600 - 4511, n=3)
3906 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=45)
1775 Points ∼39% -61%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3165 Points ∼90%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3360 Points ∼95% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
2815 Points ∼80% -11%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3531 Points ∼100% +12%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
2563 Points ∼73% -19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3062 Points ∼87% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (2972 - 3165, n=3)
3042 Points ∼86% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (782 - 3531, n=59)
2007 Points ∼57% -37%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
779 Points ∼58%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
911 Points ∼68% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
940 Points ∼70% +21%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1342 Points ∼100% +72%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
708 Points ∼53% -9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
781 Points ∼58% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (755 - 779, n=3)
767 Points ∼57% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (145 - 1342, n=59)
576 Points ∼43% -26%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
11557 Points ∼95%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9491 Points ∼78% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8648 Points ∼71% -25%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8574 Points ∼70% -26%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12228 Points ∼100% +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (8309 - 11557, n=2)
9933 Points ∼81% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=341)
4791 Points ∼39% -59%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12774 Points ∼96%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13279 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
12557 Points ∼95% -2%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9880 Points ∼74% -23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12280 Points ∼92% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (12324 - 12774, n=2)
12549 Points ∼95% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13279, n=404)
4860 Points ∼37% -62%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3935 Points ∼82%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4278 Points ∼89% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4791 Points ∼100% +22%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3306 Points ∼69% -16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3898 Points ∼81% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3915 - 3935, n=2)
3925 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=404)
1478 Points ∼31% -62%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
11341 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11387 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10255 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
7551 Points ∼66% -33%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9135 Points ∼80% -19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points ∼91% -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (8512 - 11341, n=3)
9530 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=461)
5658 Points ∼50% -50%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
14352 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13360 Points ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
14307 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
9240 Points ∼64% -36%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
12996 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points ∼97% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (10628 - 14352, n=3)
12083 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=622)
6179 Points ∼43% -57%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4057 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3843 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3201 Points ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2752 Points ∼68% -32%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3183 Points ∼78% -22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points ∼95% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3638 - 4057, n=3)
3793 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=123)
2609 Points ∼64% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6360 Points ∼73%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8076 Points ∼93% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8659 Points ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2145 Points ∼25% -66%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4688 Points ∼54% -26%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points ∼74% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4046 - 6360, n=3)
5577 Points ∼64% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=123)
2830 Points ∼33% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5648 Points ∼88%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6444 Points ∼100% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6280 Points ∼97% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2256 Points ∼35% -60%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4242 Points ∼66% -25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points ∼86% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3948 - 5648, n=3)
5017 Points ∼78% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6618, n=123)
2550 Points ∼40% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5728 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5187 Points ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4447 Points ∼78% -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3018 Points ∼53% -47%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3202 Points ∼56% -44%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4171 Points ∼73% -27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points ∼97% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (2497 - 5728, n=3)
4383 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5728, n=467)
2109 Points ∼37% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6771 Points ∼72%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9345 Points ∼100% +38%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9157 Points ∼98% +35%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8374 Points ∼90% +24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2492 Points ∼27% -63%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4361 Points ∼47% -36%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points ∼71% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (5672 - 6771, n=3)
6350 Points ∼68% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9389, n=467)
1976 Points ∼21% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6508 Points ∼82%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7982 Points ∼100% +23%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7412 Points ∼93% +14%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6006 Points ∼75% -8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2567 Points ∼32% -61%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4317 Points ∼54% -34%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points ∼80% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4422 - 6508, n=3)
5690 Points ∼71% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8111, n=468)
1834 Points ∼23% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5718 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5209 Points ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4436 Points ∼78% -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3877 Points ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3155 Points ∼55% -45%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4164 Points ∼73% -27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points ∼90% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4836 - 5718, n=3)
5184 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5718, n=497)
2019 Points ∼35% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7905 Points ∼39%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12573 Points ∼62% +59%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9470 Points ∼47% +20%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
20154 Points ∼100% +155%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3648 Points ∼18% -54%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5767 Points ∼29% -27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points ∼40% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4064 - 7905, n=3)
5421 Points ∼27% -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=497)
2620 Points ∼13% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7286 Points ∼70%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9616 Points ∼92% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7563 Points ∼73% +4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
10427 Points ∼100% +43%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3522 Points ∼34% -52%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5313 Points ∼51% -27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points ∼68% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4213 - 7286, n=3)
5310 Points ∼51% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=497)
2202 Points ∼21% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4971 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4582 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4267 Points ∼86% -14%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3218 Points ∼65% -35%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3202 Points ∼64% -36%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3849 Points ∼77% -23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points ∼99% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4242 - 4971, n=3)
4506 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4987, n=547)
2002 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6465 Points ∼78%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8045 Points ∼97% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8257 Points ∼100% +28%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5761 Points ∼70% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2245 Points ∼27% -65%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4400 Points ∼53% -32%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points ∼78% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (6244 - 6465, n=3)
6325 Points ∼77% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=547)
1649 Points ∼20% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6060 Points ∼86%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7012 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6836 Points ∼97% +13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4901 Points ∼70% -19%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2405 Points ∼34% -60%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4264 Points ∼61% -30%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points ∼86% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (5651 - 6060, n=3)
5800 Points ∼83% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7190, n=548)
1577 Points ∼22% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4975 Points ∼98%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5054 Points ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3889 Points ∼77% -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3228 Points ∼64% -35%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3828 Points ∼76% -23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points ∼97% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4192 - 4975, n=3)
4482 Points ∼89% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=589)
1867 Points ∼37% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7499 Points ∼65%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11458 Points ∼100% +53%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
11488 Points ∼100% +53%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3485 Points ∼30% -54%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5431 Points ∼47% -28%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points ∼67% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3894 - 7499, n=3)
5146 Points ∼45% -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12394, n=588)
2148 Points ∼19% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6739 Points ∼76%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8866 Points ∼100% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8010 Points ∼90% +19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3424 Points ∼39% -49%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4969 Points ∼56% -26%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points ∼77% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3973 - 6739, n=3)
4929 Points ∼56% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9123, n=591)
1855 Points ∼21% -72%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
46731 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28147 Points ∼60% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
42135 Points ∼90% -10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33925 Points ∼73% -27%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
31483 Points ∼67% -33%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43459 Points ∼93% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (22857 - 46731, n=3)
31526 Points ∼67% -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 46731, n=734)
14873 Points ∼32% -68%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
82652 Points ∼40%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
145567 Points ∼70% +76%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
79572 Points ∼38% -4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
208190 Points ∼100% +152%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
63469 Points ∼30% -23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75073 Points ∼36% -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (60860 - 82652, n=3)
69885 Points ∼34% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=732)
24244 Points ∼12% -71%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
70593 Points ∼73%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
75632 Points ∼78% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
66452 Points ∼68% -6%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
97216 Points ∼100% +38%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
51779 Points ∼53% -27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
64626 Points ∼66% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (46141 - 70593, n=3)
54429 Points ∼56% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97290, n=732)
19334 Points ∼20% -73%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼49%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
202 fps ∼65% +33%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
200 fps ∼65% +32%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
309 fps ∼100% +103%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
138 fps ∼45% -9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼49% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (139 - 152, n=3)
147 fps ∼48% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=750)
41.9 fps ∼14% -72%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼50%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
119 fps ∼100% +98%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (58 - 60, n=3)
59.3 fps ∼50% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=759)
29.7 fps ∼25% -50%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
118 fps ∼70%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
123 fps ∼73% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
100 fps ∼60% -15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
168 fps ∼100% +42%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
91 fps ∼54% -23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps ∼63% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (81 - 118, n=3)
99.7 fps ∼59% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=654)
24.5 fps ∼15% -79%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
59 fps ∼98%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
58 fps ∼97% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
59 fps ∼98% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
59 fps ∼98% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (46 - 59, n=3)
50.7 fps ∼85% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=663)
21 fps ∼35% -64%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75 fps ∼67%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps ∼77% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
72 fps ∼64% -4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
112 fps ∼100% +49%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
56 fps ∼50% -25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps ∼50% -25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (33 - 75, n=3)
53 fps ∼47% -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=518)
19.8 fps ∼18% -74%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
52 fps ∼71%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
45 fps ∼62% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
58 fps ∼79% +12%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼82% +15%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
47 fps ∼64% -10%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps ∼100% +40%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (26 - 57, n=3)
45 fps ∼62% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=520)
18.3 fps ∼25% -65%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
23 fps ∼51%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
18 fps ∼40% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
33 fps ∼73% +43%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
45 fps ∼100% +96%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps ∼22% -57%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
20 fps ∼44% -13%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼58% +13%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (23 - 46, n=3)
32 fps ∼71% +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=259)
10.7 fps ∼24% -53%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼49%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼52% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
22 fps ∼57% +16%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼75% +53%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
6.7 fps ∼17% -65%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
14 fps ∼36% -26%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼49% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (19 - 68, n=3)
38.7 fps ∼100% +104%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 68, n=257)
7.59 fps ∼20% -60%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
36 fps ∼63%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28 fps ∼49% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
51 fps ∼89% +42%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
57 fps ∼100% +58%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼28% -56%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
32 fps ∼56% -11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps ∼70% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (36 - 60, n=3)
46 fps ∼81% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=263)
15.9 fps ∼28% -56%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
50 fps ∼57%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps ∼60% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
56 fps ∼64% +12%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
74 fps ∼84% +48%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼20% -64%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
36 fps ∼41% -28%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼56% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (49 - 165, n=3)
88 fps ∼100% +76%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 165, n=262)
17.9 fps ∼20% -64%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
44 fps ∼70%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼81% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
50 fps ∼79% +14%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼100% +43%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
33 fps ∼52% -25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps ∼65% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (32 - 44, n=3)
39.7 fps ∼63% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=443)
13.4 fps ∼21% -70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31 fps ∼63%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
26 fps ∼53% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
44 fps ∼90% +42%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
49 fps ∼100% +58%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
27 fps ∼55% -13%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps ∼69% +10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (17 - 36, n=3)
28 fps ∼57% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=447)
12 fps ∼24% -61%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
496966 Points ∼83%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
599843 Points ∼100% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
498708 Points ∼83% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
534558 Points ∼89% +8%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
417287 Points ∼70% -16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
483224 Points ∼81% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (450373 - 496966, n=3)
472677 Points ∼79% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 599843, n=71)
299770 Points ∼50% -40%
VRMark - Amber Room (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5037 Score ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4988 Score ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4957 Score ∼98% -2%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5020 Score ∼100% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4997 Score ∼99% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4980 - 5037, n=2)
5009 Score ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7156, n=77)
2550 Score ∼51% -49%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1629 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1351 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
1270 Points ∼78% -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1409 Points ∼86% -14%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points ∼90% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (950 - 1629, n=3)
1280 Points ∼79% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=685)
790 Points ∼48% -52%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10138 Points ∼88%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11496 Points ∼100% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10781 Points ∼94% +6%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
7758 Points ∼67% -23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points ∼88% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (8570 - 10138, n=3)
9114 Points ∼79% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=685)
2296 Points ∼20% -77%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6038 Points ∼93%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6350 Points ∼98% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4497 Points ∼69% -26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5210 Points ∼80% -14%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points ∼95% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (6038 - 6942, n=3)
6478 Points ∼100% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7945, n=685)
1698 Points ∼26% -72%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9782 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9555 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9478 Points ∼97% -3%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8572 Points ∼88% -12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points ∼95% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (8823 - 9782, n=3)
9199 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=685)
3240 Points ∼33% -67%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5589 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5540 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4915 Points ∼88% -12%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4701 Points ∼84% -16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points ∼96% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4640 - 5589, n=3)
5111 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=685)
1637 Points ∼29% -71%
Basemark GPU 1.2
Vulkan Medium Native (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40.52 (min: 8.72, max: 66.83) fps ∼88%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
41.67 (min: 24.54, max: 66.22) fps ∼91% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
42.64 (min: 18.1, max: 74.99) fps ∼93% +5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
45.92 (min: 7.8, max: 77.95) fps ∼100% +13%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (22.6 - 40.5, n=2)
31.5 fps ∼69% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18.9 - 45.9, n=10)
31.2 fps ∼68% -23%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
53.27 (min: 13.18, max: 90.75) fps ∼73%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
72.56 (min: 32.87, max: 131.8) fps ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
71.55 (min: 21.96, max: 153.62) fps ∼99% +34%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
52.62 (min: 9.22, max: 88.62) fps ∼73% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (53.3 - 54.4, n=2)
53.8 fps ∼74% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.71 - 72.6, n=12)
35.1 fps ∼48% -34%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
258.44 (min: 94.23, max: 1893.49) fps ∼57%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
451.65 (min: 104.76, max: 3779.98) fps ∼100% +75%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
364.91 (min: 102.63, max: 1528.33) fps ∼81% +41%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
263.14 (min: 73.93, max: 1588.09) fps ∼58% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (258 - 265, n=2)
262 fps ∼58% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22.7 - 452, n=12)
196 fps ∼43% -24%
OpenGL Medium Native (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
48.88 (min: 15.26, max: 70.77) fps ∼91%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
43.11 (min: 22.09, max: 84.76) fps ∼80% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
49.21 (min: 16.35, max: 130.08) fps ∼91% +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
53.86 (min: 18.27, max: 79.77) fps ∼100% +10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (21.4 - 48.9, n=2)
35.1 fps ∼65% -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17.9 - 53.9, n=10)
33.6 fps ∼62% -31%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
63.21 (min: 17.4, max: 89.51) fps ∼74%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
75.88 (min: 34.23, max: 132.54) fps ∼89% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
85.44 (min: 20.45, max: 139.09) fps ∼100% +35%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
63.13 (min: 18.68, max: 143.33) fps ∼74% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (63.2 - 63.9, n=2)
63.6 fps ∼74% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.8 - 85.4, n=12)
38.4 fps ∼45% -39%
1280x720 OpenGL Simple Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
280.11 (min: 94.33, max: 1378.32) fps ∼52%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
537.09 (min: 99.97, max: 3001.7) fps ∼100% +92%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
297.33 (min: 37.15, max: 1346.87) fps ∼55% +6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
282.86 (min: 81.99, max: 2027.46) fps ∼53% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (276 - 280, n=2)
278 fps ∼52% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (27.2 - 537, n=12)
188 fps ∼35% -33%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0)
128.525 Points ∼100% +84%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
69.956 Points ∼54%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
64.567 Points ∼50% -8%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
60.469 Points ∼47% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (55.6 - 70, n=3)
60.4 Points ∼47% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
51.826 Points ∼40% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=147)
38.8 Points ∼30% -45%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0)
299.99 Points ∼100% +157%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
116.61 Points ∼39%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
114.65 Points ∼38% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (103 - 117, n=3)
108 Points ∼36% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
89.62 Points ∼30% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=579)
44.9 Points ∼15% -61%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0)
153 runs/min ∼100% +113%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
71.8 runs/min ∼47%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
71 runs/min ∼46% -1%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
67.8 runs/min ∼44% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (63 - 71.8, n=3)
66 runs/min ∼43% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
63.7 runs/min ∼42% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=132)
42.7 runs/min ∼28% -41%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0)
183 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
122 Points ∼67%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
100 Points ∼55%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (95 - 98, n=2)
96.5 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
86 Points ∼47%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=210)
68.8 Points ∼38%
Huawei P40 Pro
Points ∼0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0)
49151 Points ∼100% +107%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
23690 Points ∼48%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
22976 Points ∼47% -3%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
22447 Points ∼46% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (20917 - 23690, n=3)
21985 Points ∼45% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
19122 Points ∼39% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=741)
7377 Points ∼15% -69%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (550 - 59466, n=766)
10139 ms * ∼100% -430%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
2344.7 ms * ∼23% -23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (1914 - 2287, n=3)
2140 ms * ∼21% -12%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
2043.6 ms * ∼20% -7%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
2009.1 ms * ∼20% -5%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
1913.7 ms * ∼19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0)
571.7 ms * ∼6% +70%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Huawei P40 ProOppo Find X2 ProSamsung Galaxy S20 UltraXiaomi Mi Note 10 ProHuawei P30 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
10%
1%
-57%
-26%
-8%
-61%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
68.13 (Nano Memory Card)
58.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-15%
68.19 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
0%
65.6 (59.5 - 69.2, n=3)
-4%
50.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=490)
-26%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.32 (Nano Memory Card)
67.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-18%
82.6 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
0%
78.6 (71 - 82.5, n=3)
-5%
68.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=490)
-17%
Random Write 4KB
271.83
204.98
-25%
221.37
-19%
108.5
-60%
159.22
-41%
153 (24.8 - 272, n=11)
-44%
29.2 (0.14 - 272, n=826)
-89%
Random Read 4KB
228.06
202.63
-11%
202.43
-11%
119.2
-48%
174.36
-24%
199 (169 - 265, n=11)
-13%
54 (1.59 - 265, n=826)
-76%
Sequential Write 256KB
395.74
728.72
84%
697.08
76%
205.1
-48%
250.82
-37%
506 (387 - 750, n=11)
28%
112 (2.99 - 750, n=826)
-72%
Sequential Read 256KB
1774.68
1605.6
-10%
1632.02
-8%
499.2
-72%
849.48
-52%
1569 (1443 - 1781, n=11)
-12%
310 (12.1 - 1781, n=826)
-83%
010203040506070Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 0.17.0: Ø39.9 (32-41)
; World of Tanks Blitz; 6.9.0.503: Ø60 (60-61)
 29.6 °C29.6 °C28.2 °C 
 30.1 °C29.4 °C28.3 °C 
 30.2 °C30 °C28.3 °C 
Maximum: 30.2 °C
Moyenne: 29.3 °C
27.8 °C28.4 °C28.4 °C
27.2 °C28.5 °C30.4 °C
27.8 °C29.5 °C30.6 °C
Maximum: 30.6 °C
Moyenne: 28.7 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  26.4 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.534.52522.427.63121.422.84024.323.15028.233.16321.622.78022.318.610020.426.912518.63916017.251.320017.549.425015.153.631515.256.44001559.150014.261.563013.167.880013.97210001374.812501376.5160013.775.2200014.276.525001477.5315014.479.1400014.380.5500014.480.5630014.678800014.975.61000014.973.41250015.269.71600015.659.9SPL26.489.1N0.875.7median 14.6median 72Delta0.810.535.735.127.625.230.621.824.821.832.73424.627.923.227.519.235.417.942.316.556.115.253.517.352.617.253.316.855.614.660.41464.714.76114.765.114.868.81572.214.973.91576.514.676.31474.815.174.314.673.814.873.415.168.815.161.615.555.527850.958.7median 15median 64.70.49.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P40 ProApple iPhone 11 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P40 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 11 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.09 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.92 / 1.41 / 1.47 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 3.35 / 6.37 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P40 Pro
4200 mAh
Oppo Find X2 Pro
4260 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
3046 mAh
Huawei P30 Pro
4200 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-99%
-30%
-4%
-33%
-45%
-15%
Idle Minimum *
0.92
1.47
-60%
0.76
17%
0.58
37%
0.68
26%
1.38 (0.92 - 2.22, n=3)
-50%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=837)
4%
Idle Average *
1.41
3.43
-143%
1.91
-35%
1.99
-41%
2.6
-84%
2.42 (1.41 - 3.94, n=3)
-72%
1.747 (0.6 - 6.2, n=836)
-24%
Idle Maximum *
1.47
3.52
-139%
1.96
-33%
2.03
-38%
2.77
-88%
2.63 (1.47 - 4.01, n=3)
-79%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=837)
-38%
Load Average *
3.35
6.2
-85%
4.72
-41%
3.13
7%
3.74
-12%
3.73 (3.35 - 4.34, n=3)
-11%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=831)
-22%
Load Maximum *
6.37
10.63
-67%
10.15
-59%
5.43
15%
6.82
-7%
7.24 (6.37 - 8.46, n=3)
-14%
6.01 (1.2 - 14.2, n=831)
6%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)