Notebookcheck

Test du OnePlus 8 Pro : enfin la charge sans-fil !

Longtemps atttendu ! La charge sans-fil et la certification IP sur un smartphone IP sont enfin devenues réalité dans un smartphone OnePlus. L’écran 120 Hz et un filtre colorimétrique sont également nouveaux. Nous allons voir dans ce rapport de test si le OnePlus 8 Pro vaut son coût élevé, d’au moins 799 $.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (traduit par Prévots), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM OnePlus Smartphone
OnePlus 8 Pro (8 Gamme)
Processeur
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Carte graphique
Qualcomm Adreno 650
Mémoire
12288 Mo 
Écran
6.78 pouces 19.8:9, 3168 x 1440 pixel 513 PPP, capacitif, AMOLED, 240 Hz, brillant: oui, HDR, 120 Hz
Disque dur
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 Go 
, 236 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Connectique audio: USB C, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, boussole, gyroscope, capteur de proximité, capteur laser, capteur de scintillement, capteur RVB avant, A-GPS (L1/​L5), GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo (E1/​E5a)
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G, 3G, 4G (B1 / ​B2 / ​B3 / ​B4 / ​B5 / ​B7 / ​B8 / ​B12 / ​B13 / ​B17 / ​B18 / ​B19 / ​B20 / ​B25 / ​B26 / ​B28 / ​B32 / ​B34 / ​B38 / ​B39 / ​B40 / ​B41 / ​B42 / ​B46 / ​B66), 5G (n1 / ​n3 / ​n7 / ​, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.5 x 165.3 x 74.3
Batterie
4510 mAh Lithium-Ion, WarpCharge 30T, WarpCharge 30 sans-fil
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Android 10
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 48 MPix f/1,78, autofocus à comparaison de phase (omni-réactif), autofocus laser, autofocus à détection de contraste, OIS, double flash LED, vidéos à 2160p / 60 FPS (capteur 1) ; 48,0 MP, f/2,2, lentille ultra-grand-angle (capteur photo 2) ; 8,0 MP, f/2,44,
Appareil photo secondaire: 16 MPix f/2,45, vidéos à 1080p / 30 FPS
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo (hybride), Clavier: virtuel, chargeur, câble USB, coque en silicone, film de protection, outil pour carte SIM, 24 Mois Garantie, certifié IP68 ; LTE Cat 18 (réception) / Cat 13 (envoi) (1,2 Gbit/s / 150 Mbit/s) ; DAS : 0,97 W/kg (tête), 1,07 W/kg (corps), fanless, waterproof
Poids
199 g, Alimentation: 123 g
Prix
999 euros
Liens
OnePlus Page d'accueil
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
relation de la recherche.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Appareils du comparatif

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Drive
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
88 %
05/20
OnePlus 8 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650		199 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.78"3168x1440
88 %
05/20
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11		188 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.70"3200x1440
88 %
05/20
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650		208 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
87 %
11/19
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU		226 g64 GB SSD6.50"2688x1242
87 %
04/20
OnePlus 7T Pro
SD 855+, Adreno 640		206 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"3120x1440
89 %
05/20
Huawei P40 Pro
Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16		209 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.58"2640x1200
OnePlus 8 Pro
OnePlus 8 Pro
OnePlus 8 Pro
OnePlus 8 Pro
OnePlus 8 Pro
OnePlus 8 Pro
OnePlus 8 Pro

Top 10
» Le Top 10 des PC portables multimédia 
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu légers
» Le Top 10 des ordinateurs portables bureautiques
» Le Top 10 des PC portables bureautiques premium/professionnels 
» Le Top 10 des Stations de travail mobiles
» Le Top 10 des Ultraportables
» Le Top 10 des Ultrabooks
» Le Top 10 des Convertibles
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes Windows
» Le Top 10 des Smartphones
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 300 euros
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 500 euros
» Le Top 25 des meilleurs écrans d'ordinateurs

Comparaison des tailles

❌
165.3 mm 74.3 mm 8.5 mm 199 g162.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.96 mm 208 g162.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.8 mm 206 g161.9 mm 73.7 mm 7.8 mm 188 g158.2 mm 72.6 mm 8.95 mm 209 g158 mm 77.8 mm 8.1 mm 226 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P40 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1544 (797min - 1619max) MBit/s ∼100% +76%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
876 (767min - 904max) MBit/s ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
863 (759min - 898max) MBit/s ∼56% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
816 (403min - 832max) MBit/s ∼53% -7%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
589 (461min - 625max) MBit/s ∼38% -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=303, last 2 years)
438 MBit/s ∼28% -50%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
352 (311min - 375max) MBit/s ∼23% -60%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
883 (834min - 919max) MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
835 (808min - 847max) MBit/s ∼95% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
831 (745min - 872max) MBit/s ∼94%
Huawei P40 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
821 (388min - 998max) MBit/s ∼93% -1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
580 (550min - 597max) MBit/s ∼66% -30%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (347min - 505max) MBit/s ∼53% -43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=303, last 2 years)
435 MBit/s ∼49% -48%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900828846839838825854821793805823839841836834872818835854812851845830823819839853810852841745828846839838825854821793805823839841836834872818835854812851845830823819839853810852841745767889867874882894881850904895866874885888895875883896883883876869864891868895877877856873Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø831 (745-872)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø876 (767-904)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : boucle.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : boucle.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : pont.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : pont.
GPS OnePlus 8 Pro : vue générale.
GPS OnePlus 8 Pro : vue générale.
GPS OnePlus 8 Pro : boucle.
GPS OnePlus 8 Pro : boucle.
GPS OnePlus 8 Pro : pont.
GPS OnePlus 8 Pro : pont.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
OnePlus 8 Pro - Photo avec le capteur par défaut.
OnePlus 8 Pro - Photo avec le capteur par défaut.
OnePlus 8 Pro - Filtre photochromique.
OnePlus 8 Pro - Filtre photochromique.
OnePlus 8 Pro - Filtre mat.
OnePlus 8 Pro - Filtre vif.
OnePlus 8 Pro - Filtre noir et blanc.
ColorChecker
13.7 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
9 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
10 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 8 Pro: 11.2 ∆E min: 2.44 - max: 17.32 ∆E
ColorChecker
4.4 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 8 Pro: 8.01 ∆E min: 3.73 - max: 14.39 ∆E
OnePlus 8 Pro - Photo faible luminosité avec le mode normal.
OnePlus 8 Pro - Photo faible luminosité avec le mode normal.
OnePlus 8 Pro - Photo faible luminosité avec le mode nuit.
OnePlus 8 Pro - Photo faible luminosité avec le mode nuit.
OnePlus 8 Pro - Lentille par défaut.
OnePlus 8 Pro - Lentille par défaut.
OnePlus 8 Pro - Lentille par défaut.
OnePlus 8 Pro - Zoom Maximum.
OnePlus 8 Pro - Lentille par défaut.
OnePlus 8 Pro - Lentille par défaut.
OnePlus 8 Pro - Photo ultra-grand-angle.
OnePlus 8 Pro - Lentille par défaut.
OnePlus 8 Pro - Lentille par défaut.
780
cd/m²		782
cd/m²		751
cd/m²
787
cd/m²		796
cd/m²		789
cd/m²
765
cd/m²		772
cd/m²		793
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 796 cd/m² Moyenne: 779.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.9 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 94 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 796 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.68 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.237
OnePlus 8 Pro
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.78		Samsung Galaxy S20+
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.70		Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67		Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.50		OnePlus 7T Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67		Huawei P40 Pro
OLED, 2640x1200, 6.58
Screen
-87%
-13%
-49%
-133%
-38%
Brightness middle
796
740
-7%
753
-5%
790
-1%
606
-24%
584
-27%
Brightness
779
747
-4%
762
-2%
790
1%
611
-22%
576
-26%
Brightness Distribution
94
94
0%
96
2%
97
3%
95
1%
95
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
0.68
2.6
-282%
0.9
-32%
1.4
-106%
3.46
-409%
1.1
-62%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
1.55
4.57
-195%
1.6
-3%
3.4
-119%
5.64
-264%
2.3
-48%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.1
1.5
-36%
1.5
-36%
1.9
-73%
2
-82%
1.8
-64%
Gamma
2.237 98%
2.269 97%
2.24 98%
2.23 99%
2.258 97%
2.16 102%
CCT
6310 103%
6284 103%
6415 101%
6466 101%
6779 96%
6355 102%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ
Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 258 Hz

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 258 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) .

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 258 Hz est relativement élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevLa fréquence de rafraîchissement de 258 Hz est relativement élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.oir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue. Néanmoins certaines personnes pourront toujours percevoir un scintillement.

En comparaison, 52 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 15366 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ
Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
   ↔    Temps de réponse noir à blanc
7 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 3 ms hausse
↘ 4 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (23.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
   ↔    Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 5 ms hausse
↘ 3 ms chute
L'écran montre de faibles temps de réponse, un bon écran pour jouer.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (37.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5.3 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v8 | BaseMark OS II
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
909 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
944 Points ∼71% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
906 Points ∼68% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1326 Points ∼100% +46%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
779 Points ∼59% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (764 - 924, n=23)
903 Points ∼68% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=244, last 2 years)
578 Points ∼44% -36%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3318 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
2899 Points ∼83% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3338 Points ∼96% +1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3476 Points ∼100% +5%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3165 Points ∼91% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2687 - 3449, n=23)
3268 Points ∼94% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4455, n=244, last 2 years)
1981 Points ∼57% -40%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3027 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2932 Points ∼65% -3%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4511 Points ∼100% +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2829 - 3080, n=8)
2981 Points ∼66% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (351 - 4586, n=51, last 2 years)
1680 Points ∼37% -44%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2659 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2519 Points ∼63% -5%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3979 Points ∼100% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2487 - 3259, n=8)
2723 Points ∼68% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=55, last 2 years)
1574 Points ∼40% -41%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13471 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
14760 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
13142 Points ∼89% -2%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
12645 Points ∼86% -6%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
14352 Points ∼97% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (10990 - 19989, n=22)
13584 Points ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=213, last 2 years)
10002 Points ∼68% -26%
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11153 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10583 Points ∼93% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10952 Points ∼97% -2%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10442 Points ∼92% -6%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
11341 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9202 - 15299, n=23)
11246 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=260, last 2 years)
7923 Points ∼70% -29%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
82562 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
41415 Points ∼43% -50%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
82937 Points ∼86% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
96826 Points ∼100% +17%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
72173 Points ∼75% -13%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
70593 Points ∼73% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (56045 - 112989, n=20)
84555 Points ∼87% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=196, last 2 years)
40028 Points ∼41% -52%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
149017 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
48476 Points ∼24% -67%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
150281 Points ∼73% +1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
206190 Points ∼100% +38%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
118129 Points ∼57% -21%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
82652 Points ∼40% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (110875 - 180392, n=20)
147707 Points ∼72% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=196, last 2 years)
57258 Points ∼28% -62%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
32240 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
27431 Points ∼59% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
32384 Points ∼69% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33898 Points ∼73% +5%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
30561 Points ∼65% -5%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
46731 Points ∼100% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (17817 - 58293, n=20)
35224 Points ∼75% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=196, last 2 years)
23237 Points ∼50% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8811 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5696 Points ∼62% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9123 Points ∼100% +4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
7893 Points ∼87% -10%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8165 Points ∼89% -7%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6739 Points ∼74% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8215 - 9611, n=20)
8915 Points ∼98% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=257, last 2 years)
3439 Points ∼38% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11371 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6392 Points ∼52% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12394 Points ∼100% +9%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
11302 Points ∼91% -1%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10637 Points ∼86% -6%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7499 Points ∼61% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (10599 - 13305, n=20)
11750 Points ∼95% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=257, last 2 years)
4029 Points ∼33% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4928 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4124 Points ∼83% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4729 Points ∼95% -4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3839 Points ∼77% -22%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4503 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4975 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3965 - 5274, n=20)
4844 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=257, last 2 years)
2786 Points ∼56% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9807 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7576 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8823 Points ∼90% -10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8605 Points ∼88% -12%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7286 Points ∼74% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8499 - 11492, n=22)
9645 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=278, last 2 years)
4136 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12665 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9471 Points ∼73% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12694 Points ∼98% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11448 Points ∼89% -10%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7905 Points ∼61% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11956 - 16809, n=22)
12921 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=278, last 2 years)
5238 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5480 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4455 Points ∼78% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4283 Points ∼75% -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4604 Points ∼81% -16%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5718 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3956 - 5765, n=22)
5138 Points ∼90% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=276, last 2 years)
2982 Points ∼52% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7117 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6896 Points ∼96% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7157 Points ∼100% +1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5471 Points ∼76% -23%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6266 Points ∼88% -12%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6060 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5996 - 7653, n=21)
7103 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=253, last 2 years)
2640 Points ∼37% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8106 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8469 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8299 Points ∼98% +2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6088 Points ∼72% -25%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7044 Points ∼83% -13%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6465 Points ∼76% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (6500 - 9167, n=20)
8128 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=253, last 2 years)
2791 Points ∼33% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4987 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4180 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4895 Points ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4038 Points ∼81% -19%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4519 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4971 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4582 - 5209, n=20)
4941 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=253, last 2 years)
2819 Points ∼57% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8111 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7459 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7986 Points ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6916 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6508 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7517 - 8947, n=23)
8073 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=277, last 2 years)
3358 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9379 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9190 Points ∼97% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9356 Points ∼98% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8006 Points ∼84% -15%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6771 Points ∼71% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8633 - 11999, n=22)
9501 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=277, last 2 years)
3792 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5506 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4495 Points ∼78% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5277 Points ∼92% -4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4683 Points ∼82% -15%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5728 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4733 - 5780, n=22)
5319 Points ∼93% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=277, last 2 years)
3027 Points ∼53% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6618 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6355 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6578 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5509 Points ∼83% -17%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5648 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4582 - 6961, n=20)
6202 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=213, last 2 years)
2618 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8279 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8783 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8173 Points ∼93% -1%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6527 Points ∼74% -21%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6360 Points ∼72% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7618 - 9104, n=19)
8249 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=213, last 2 years)
2933 Points ∼33% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3888 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3230 Points ∼80% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3830 Points ∼94% -1%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3564 Points ∼88% -8%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4057 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1786 - 4061, n=19)
3414 Points ∼84% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=213, last 2 years)
2647 Points ∼65% -32%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼100% +50%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼66% -2%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (50 - 138, n=23)
75.4 fps ∼84% +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=216, last 2 years)
58.8 fps ∼65% -2%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
206 fps ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
199 fps ∼69% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
203 fps ∼71% -1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
287 fps ∼100% +39%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼64% -10%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼53% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (168 - 266, n=23)
206 fps ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 319, n=216, last 2 years)
107 fps ∼37% -48%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼100% +47%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼68% 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼65% -5%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
59 fps ∼67% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (50 - 111, n=23)
71.7 fps ∼81% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=214, last 2 years)
46.4 fps ∼53% -23%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
126 fps ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
126 fps ∼80% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
122 fps ∼78% -3%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
157 fps ∼100% +25%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
111 fps ∼71% -12%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
118 fps ∼75% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (96 - 151, n=23)
124 fps ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=215, last 2 years)
62.8 fps ∼40% -50%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
59 fps ∼77% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
77 fps ∼100% +28%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼78% 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
40 fps ∼52% -33%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
52 fps ∼68% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (43 - 83, n=24)
60.1 fps ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=213, last 2 years)
36.4 fps ∼47% -39%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
85 fps ∼85% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps ∼86% -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
100 fps ∼100% +14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼79% -10%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75 fps ∼75% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (67 - 103, n=24)
86 fps ∼86% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=213, last 2 years)
43.1 fps ∼43% -51%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
45 fps ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
45 fps ∼94% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
45 fps ∼94% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps ∼100% +7%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼50% -47%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31 fps ∼65% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (25 - 54, n=24)
40.5 fps ∼84% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=212, last 2 years)
22.5 fps ∼47% -50%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
51 fps ∼81% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps ∼79% -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼100% +24%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
48 fps ∼76% -6%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
44 fps ∼70% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (39 - 62, n=24)
51.1 fps ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=212, last 2 years)
25.9 fps ∼41% -49%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
48 fps ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
52 fps ∼90% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps ∼81% -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
58 fps ∼100% +21%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼45% -46%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
36 fps ∼62% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (28 - 57, n=25)
43.2 fps ∼74% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=281, last 2 years)
22.9 fps ∼39% -52%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
58 fps ∼77% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
54 (20min) fps ∼72% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +39%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼63% -13%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
50 fps ∼67% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (27 - 67, n=25)
52.7 fps ∼70% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=280, last 2 years)
26.4 fps ∼35% -51%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
33 fps ∼72% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
30 fps ∼65% -3%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
46 fps ∼100% +48%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼37% -45%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
23 fps ∼50% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (18 - 40, n=25)
27.8 fps ∼60% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=281, last 2 years)
15.1 fps ∼33% -51%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
22 fps ∼76% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼69% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼100% +45%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
19 fps ∼66% -5%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼66% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (20 - 27, n=25)
20.5 fps ∼71% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=281, last 2 years)
10.3 fps ∼36% -48%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
585231 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
296746 Points ∼50% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
595466 Points ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
510245 Points ∼86% -13%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
486654 Points ∼82% -17%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
496966 Points ∼83% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (527301 - 631025, n=24)
579049 Points ∼97% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=193, last 2 years)
336601 Points ∼57% -42%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5993 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4779 Points ∼79% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6072 Points ∼100% +1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5607 Points ∼92% -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4992 Points ∼82% -17%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5589 Points ∼92% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5264 - 6402, n=23)
5871 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 7123, n=201, last 2 years)
3712 Points ∼61% -38%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10058 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9281 Points ∼65% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10002 Points ∼70% -1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
14189 Points ∼100% +41%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
9294 Points ∼66% -8%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9782 Points ∼69% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8412 - 10147, n=23)
9660 Points ∼68% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 11774, n=201, last 2 years)
6771 Points ∼48% -33%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7240 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3775 Points ∼48% -48%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7945 Points ∼100% +10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2350 Points ∼30% -68%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5091 Points ∼64% -30%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6038 Points ∼76% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5304 - 8874, n=23)
7073 Points ∼89% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=201, last 2 years)
4373 Points ∼55% -40%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11842 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10803 Points ∼64% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11567 Points ∼68% -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
16996 Points ∼100% +44%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10618 Points ∼62% -10%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10138 Points ∼60% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11366 - 13833, n=23)
11779 Points ∼69% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 15628, n=201, last 2 years)
5775 Points ∼34% -51%
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1496 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
1378 Points ∼79% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1514 Points ∼87% +1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1745 Points ∼100% +17%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1236 Points ∼71% -17%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1629 Points ∼93% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1276 - 2169, n=23)
1497 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=201, last 2 years)
1280 Points ∼73% -14%
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
129.096 Points ∼100% +104%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
69.956 Points ∼54% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
64.958 Points ∼50% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=20)
63.6 Points ∼49% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
63.374 Points ∼49%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
62.417 Points ∼48% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
50.566 Points ∼39% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=183, last 2 years)
49.7 Points ∼38% -22%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
301.91 Points ∼100% +163%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
116.61 Points ∼39% +2%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
115.44 Points ∼38% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
115.43 Points ∼38% +1%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
114.78 Points ∼38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 145, n=21)
113 Points ∼37% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=195, last 2 years)
89.5 Points ∼30% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
89.329 Points ∼30% -22%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
153 runs/min ∼100% +126%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
71.8 runs/min ∼47% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
68.6 runs/min ∼45% +1%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chome 80)
67.7 runs/min ∼44%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chome 78)
66.4 runs/min ∼43% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=19)
63.9 runs/min ∼42% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chome 80)
62.8 runs/min ∼41% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=168, last 2 years)
49.1 runs/min ∼32% -27%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
181 Points ∼100% +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=23)
107 Points ∼59% +3%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
104 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
101 Points ∼56% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
93 Points ∼51% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
86 Points ∼48% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=203, last 2 years)
78.2 Points ∼43% -25%
Huawei P40 Pro
Points ∼0% -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
49388 Points ∼100% +109%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
23999 Points ∼49% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
23690 Points ∼48% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
23678 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
22834 Points ∼46% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 31224, n=23)
22518 Points ∼46% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
18094 Points ∼37% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=210, last 2 years)
17634 Points ∼36% -26%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=212, last 2 years)
3929 ms * ∼100% -102%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
2488.3 ms * ∼63% -28%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
2133.5 ms * ∼54% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1623 - 2911, n=24)
2031 ms * ∼52% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
2021.2 ms * ∼51% -4%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
1944.7 ms * ∼49%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
1913.7 ms * ∼49% +2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
570.9 ms * ∼15% +71%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

OnePlus 8 ProSamsung Galaxy S20+Xiaomi Mi 10 ProOnePlus 7T ProHuawei P40 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
2%
17%
-40%
2%
-8%
-44%
Sequential Read 256KB
1627.3
1603.1
-1%
1738.65
7%
1489
-8%
1774.68
9%
1603 (1398 - 1789, n=20)
-1%
781 (41.9 - 2037, n=289, last 2 years)
-52%
Sequential Write 256KB
730.4
694.3
-5%
750.44
3%
405
-45%
395.74
-46%
546 (387 - 756, n=20)
-25%
346 (11.9 - 1321, n=289, last 2 years)
-53%
Random Read 4KB
208.3
199.6
-4%
264.9
27%
169
-19%
228.06
9%
208 (169 - 265, n=20)
0%
139 (13.5 - 325, n=289, last 2 years)
-33%
Random Write 4KB
197.7
229.8
16%
258.54
31%
26
-87%
271.83
37%
184 (24.8 - 272, n=20)
-7%
125 (5.2 - 330, n=289, last 2 years)
-37%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
66.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.32 (Nano Memory Card)
70.6 (34.7 - 82.5, n=5)
76.2 (13.4 - 154, n=166, last 2 years)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
57.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
68.13 (Nano Memory Card)
59.8 (30.7 - 71.7, n=5)
58.5 (8.4 - 83.3, n=166, last 2 years)
051015202530354045505560657075394040414039404040413940404040404140393940404041394040404040404038404040404039404139394139404040404040394140404139394140404039404140403940404140404040394039404040404040404040404040404040404040404040394041404039414040403940404140394040404040404040403941404041384140404040394040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040403940404140394040404139404040404041403939404040413940404040404040384040404040394041393941394040404040403941404041393941404040394041404039404041404040403940394040404040404040404040404040404040404040403940414040394140404039404041403940404040404040404039414040413841404040403940404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040414039404040404039404039403940404040413940404040404040393941403940394040403940394040403940394039403940404139413940404040394040384040404039384040413940394139411781254471816461045252177448264616184411232808681916472446102472172720451545122375573720451512452372422726472114221345723527152313444415217273735245132245142172177134451324452015773764234411174518739762254411174617274691761462591819454492527712694545181745251037772819451624451135727271204515124523724417452046141212361683273517421314394040414039404040413940404040404140393940404041394040404040404038404040404039404139394139404040404040394140404139394140404039404140403940404140404040394039404040404040404040404040404040404040404040394041404039414040403940404140394040404040404040403941404041384140404040394040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404041403940404040403940403940394040404041394040404040404039394140394039404040394039404040394039403940394040413941394040404039404038404040403938404041394039413941178125447181646104525217744826461618441123280868191647244610247217272045154512237557372045151245237242272647211422134572352715231344441521727373524513224514217217713445132445201577376423441117451873976225441117461727469176146259181945449252771269454518174525103777281945162445113572727120451512452372441745204614121236168327351742131430303030303030303030303030293031302931293129313030303029313030303029303030313030303030303030303030303030302931394040414039404040413940404040404140393940404041394040404040404038404040404039404139394139404040404040394140404139394140404039404140403940404140404040394039404040404040404040404040404040404040404040394041404039414040403940404140394040404040404040403941404041384140404040394040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404041403940404040403940403940394040404041394040404040404039394140394039404040394039404040394039403940394040413941394040404039404038404040403938404041394039413941178125447181646104525217744826461618441123280868191647244610247217272045154512237557372045151245237242272647211422134572352715231344441521727373524513224514217217713445132445201577376423441117451873976225441117461727469176146259181945449252771269454518174525103777281945162445113572727120451512452372441745204614121236168327351742131430303030303030303030303030293031302931293129313030303029313030303029303030313030303030303030303030303030302931303030303028312930303029293129313029302930303029312929303030303030283030303030302929303030303029303029313030Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.17.0: Ø39.9 (38-41)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.17.0: Ø31.2 (1-80)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.1.2a: Ø30 (29-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.1.2a: Ø29.8 (28-31)
A pleine charge
 46.4 °C46 °C42.4 °C 
 46.6 °C45.8 °C42.5 °C 
 46.7 °C45.6 °C42.7 °C 
Maximum: 46.7 °C
Moyenne: 45 °C
41.7 °C43.6 °C46.9 °C
41.4 °C43.3 °C45.6 °C
41 °C43.8 °C44.8 °C
Maximum: 46.9 °C
Moyenne: 43.6 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  39.6 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.342.22540.741.63131.131.64034.337.65034.738.86328.930.88023.826.510026.229.11252233.116020.742.62002149.425018.653.231517.757.640017.260.65001962.46301764.680015.268.5100017.371.3125015.476.4160018.573.8200015.973.5250015.176.1315014.475.6400014.871.2500015.168.7630015.363.2800015.665.51000015.965.41250016.160.61600016.654.4SPL67.428.384.4N19.31.156median 16.6median 64.6Delta1.68.841.231.237.534.130.529.33329.637.635.828.625.823.922.222.824.721.929.220.338.82045.819.153.51756.616.556.116.86016.260.515.564.614.869.114.171.415.573.915.572.514.571.213.869.713.76713.866.81465.51466.914.165.714.263.414.35365.168.168.164.360.964.462.127.181.418.721.921.916.313.816.914.70.948median 15.5median 64.61.97.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 8 ProOnePlus 7T Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

OnePlus 7T Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0 / 0.2 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 2.2 / 3.3 / 3.7 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 5.9 / 8.3 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
OnePlus 8 Pro
4510 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S20+
4500 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh		Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh		OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh		Huawei P40 Pro
4200 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
20%
46%
31%
6%
48%
22%
37%
Idle Minimum *
2.2
1
55%
0.61
72%
0.92
58%
2.1
5%
0.92
58%
1.133 (0.52 - 2.2, n=22)
48%
0.948 (0.37 - 2.5, n=233, last 2 years)
57%
Idle Average *
3.3
1.7
48%
1.19
64%
2.9
12%
3
9%
1.41
57%
2.23 (1.19 - 5.37, n=22)
32%
1.812 (0.65 - 3.94, n=233, last 2 years)
45%
Idle Maximum *
3.7
2.3
38%
1.23
67%
2.94
21%
3.5
5%
1.47
60%
2.45 (1.23 - 5.41, n=22)
34%
2.06 (0.69 - 4.2, n=233, last 2 years)
44%
Load Average *
5.9
5.8
2%
4.18
29%
3.65
38%
5.3
10%
3.35
43%
5.26 (3.5 - 7.4, n=22)
11%
4.44 (2.1 - 8.4, n=233, last 2 years)
25%
Load Maximum *
8.3
11.8
-42%
8.53
-3%
6.18
26%
8.3
-0%
6.37
23%
9.68 (7.67 - 12.3, n=22)
-17%
7.27 (3.16 - 12.3, n=233, last 2 years)
12%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
35h 03min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 23min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
17h 03min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
4h 56min
OnePlus 8 Pro
4510 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S20+
4500 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh		Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh		OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh		Huawei P40 Pro
4200 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
-12%
-11%
23%
-4%
-18%
Reader / Idle
2103
2041
-3%
2133
1%
2618
24%
2015
-4%
1474
-30%
H.264
1023
978
-4%
973
-5%
1346
32%
957
-6%
1137
11%
WiFi v1.3
923
794
-14%
865
-6%
909
-2%
912
-1%
743
-20%
Load
296
218
-26%
198
-33%
408
38%
283
-4%
198
-33%

Points positifs

+ luminosité et couleurs de l'écran 120 Hz
+ fluidité du tactile
+ design
+ performances
+ autonomie
+ appareil photo
+ mémoire
+ absence de throttling
+ GPS précis
+ bandes LTE
+ certification IP
+ charge rapide

Points négatifs

- qualité d'appel
- températures en cas de sollicitations
- câble USB 2.0
- absence de mmWave 5G
- absence de VHT160 du Wifi 6

Verdict

En test : le OnePlus 8 Pro. Modèle de test fourni par OnePlus Allemagne.
En test : le OnePlus 8 Pro. Modèle de test fourni par OnePlus Allemagne.

Le OnePlus 8 Pro est un excellent smartphone qui est toujours relativement bon marché, vu ses fonctionnalités et par rapport aux autres fleurons. OnePlus a néanmoins atteint la marque des 1 000 €, faisant du OnePlus 8 Pro un smartphone haut de gamme des moins chers, avec d’excellentes fonctionnalités, plutôt qu’un fleuron abordable.

Cela inclut l’excellent écran 120 Hz, très lumineux et HDR10+. OnePlus a suffisamment bien célébré la dalle pour les éditeurs photo professionnels. De plus, son taux d’image de 240 Hz rend le tactile incroyablement rapide.

Nouvelles fonctionnalités et nouveau prix : le OnePlus 8 Pro propose une technologie du meilleur niveau, mais le smartphone OnePlus n’est plus à petit prix.

Performances élevées, absence de throttling et fin des crashs en cas de sollicitations soutenues, le tout avec une bonne autonomie, la charge rapide, une partie logicielle récente et un stockage plus rapide. Que demander de plus ? Eh bien OnePlus devrait améliorer la qualité d’appel et réduire la chauffe, qui reste plutôt élevée.

Dans l’ensemble, OnePlus a cependant produit un excellent flagship, qui possède enfin une certification IP et la charge sans-fil.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

OnePlus 8 Pro - 04/21/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Châssis
91%
Clavier
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositif de pointage
97%
Connectivité
53 / 70 → 76%
Poids
88%
Autonomie
91%
Écran
93%
Performances en jeu
61 / 64 → 95%
Performances dans les applications
83 / 86 → 96%
Chauffe
82%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%