Notebookcheck

Courte critique du smartphone Oukitel C13 Pro

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, T. Hinum (traduit par Prévots), 05/01/2019

Un smartphone à 70 € ? Le smartphone Oukitel à bas prix possède une allure impressionnante vu son niveau de prix. Mais est-ce vraiment le smartphone bon marché à choisir ? Ce rapport de test de l’Oukitel C13 Pro répond à cette question.

Oukitel C13 Pro (C Gamme)
Processeur
Carte graphique
PowerVR GE8100
Mémoire
2048 Mo 
Écran
6.18 pouces 18.7:9, 996 x 480 pixel 179 PPP, capacitif, LCD IPS, brillant: oui
Disque dur
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 Go 
, 10.4 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro USB jusqu'à 128 Go, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: capteur de mouvement, capteur de proximité
Réseau
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G/GSM: 850/900/1800/1900MHz (B5/B8/B3/B2), 3G/WCDMA: 900/2100MHz (B8/B1), 4G/FDD-LTE: 800/900/1800/2100/2600MHz (B20/B8/B3/B1/B7), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.3 x 155.5 x 76
Batterie
3000 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 8 MPix 8+2 double capteur photo, appareil photo 2 API : Full
Appareil photo secondaire: 5 MPix
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, chargeur, câble micro USB, coque de protection en plastique, guide de démarrage rapide, Oukitel UI, 12 Mois Garantie, LTE Cat.4 (150 Mbit/s - 50 Mbit/s), DRM Widevine : L3, fanless
Poids
177 g, Alimentation: 51 g
Prix
90 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Oukitel C13 Pro

Comparaison des tailles

155.5 mm 76 mm 8.3 mm 177 g153.8 mm 76 mm 9.8 mm 180 g153.6 mm 77.6 mm 9.7 mm 174 g147.5 mm 71.5 mm 8.3 mm 145 g141.4 mm 66.3 mm 8.8 mm 148 g140.4 mm 70.1 mm 8.35 mm 137 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +707%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=408)
222 MBit/s ∼33% +164%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
91.2 (min: 44, max: 108) MBit/s ∼13% +9%
Oukitel C13 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
84 (min: 7, max: 105) MBit/s ∼12%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
59.6 (min: 56, max: 61) MBit/s ∼9% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 (min: 46, max: 58) MBit/s ∼8% -34%
Cubot J3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.4 (min: 45, max: 59) MBit/s ∼8% -35%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 (min: 29, max: 54) MBit/s ∼7% -42%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼100% +468%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=408)
212 MBit/s ∼40% +126%
Oukitel C13 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
94 (min: 34, max: 102) MBit/s ∼18%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
85.6 (min: 42, max: 106) MBit/s ∼16% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
56.6 (min: 48, max: 61) MBit/s ∼11% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 (min: 52, max: 59) MBit/s ∼10% -41%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
52.7 (min: 27, max: 58) MBit/s ∼10% -44%
Cubot J3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.9 (min: 40, max: 56) MBit/s ∼10% -45%
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Oukitel C13 Pro
GPS Oukitel C13 Pro
GPS Oukitel C13 Pro
GPS Oukitel C13 Pro
GPS Oukitel C13 Pro
GPS Oukitel C13 Pro
Oukitel C13 Pro - Mode photo.
Mode photo.
Oukitel C13 Pro - Mode Bokeh.
Mode Bokeh.
Oukitel C13 Pro - Mode mono.
Mode mono.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
Oukitel C13 Pro
Oukitel C13 Pro
Oukitel C13 Pro
396
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 428 cd/m² Moyenne: 401.8 cd/m² Minimum: 14.8 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 88 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 388 cd/m²
Contraste: 1492:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 11.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
95.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.58
Oukitel C13 Pro
IPS LCD, 996x480, 6.18
Oukitel U25 Pro
IPS LCD, 1920x1080, 5.5
Nokia 2.1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Cubot J3
TN LED, 960x480, 5
Xiaomi Redmi Go
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen
8%
10%
21%
-92%
7%
62%
Brightness middle
388
649
67%
338
-13%
404
4%
400
3%
340
-12%
593
53%
Brightness
402
623
55%
327
-19%
400
0%
401
0%
309
-23%
587
46%
Brightness Distribution
88
90
2%
82
-7%
82
-7%
92
5%
77
-12%
94
7%
Black Level *
0.26
0.56
-115%
0.27
-4%
0.26
-0%
1.7
-554%
0.28
-8%
Contrast
1492
1159
-22%
1252
-16%
1554
4%
235
-84%
1214
-19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
9.2
7.1
23%
5.36
42%
4.28
53%
13.79
-50%
5.53
40%
0.9
90%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
18.4
12.6
32%
9.77
47%
9.97
46%
20.74
-13%
9.87
46%
2
89%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
11.7
9.4
20%
6.2
47%
3.5
70%
16.5
-41%
6.4
45%
1.5
87%
Gamma
2.58 85%
2.1 105%
2.345 94%
2.213 99%
3.19 69%
2.275 97%
2.27 97%
CCT
11121 58%
8629 75%
8460 77%
6899 94%
21261 31%
8198 79%
6548 99%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9439 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
33.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 17.2 ms hausse
↘ 16.4 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (25.2 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
45.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 25.6 ms hausse
↘ 19.6 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (40.2 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1460 Points ∼20%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2115 Points ∼28% +45%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1405 Points ∼19% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1699 Points ∼23% +16%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
870 Points ∼12% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1394 Points ∼19% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼100% +412%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1125 - 1460, n=13)
1226 Points ∼16% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=307)
4559 Points ∼61% +212%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1896 Points ∼17%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2727 Points ∼25% +44%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1602 Points ∼15% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2471 Points ∼22% +30%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
1174 Points ∼11% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1634 Points ∼15% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼100% +480%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1418 - 1896, n=15)
1617 Points ∼15% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=362)
4549 Points ∼41% +140%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
675 Points ∼19%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
674 Points ∼19% 0%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
636 Points ∼18% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
825 Points ∼23% +22%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
437 Points ∼12% -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
631 Points ∼18% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼100% +422%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (571 - 675, n=15)
590 Points ∼17% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=364)
1354 Points ∼38% +101%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
5377 Points ∼60%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
3850 Points ∼43% -28%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3146 Points ∼35% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3192 Points ∼35% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼100% +68%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (2630 - 5377, n=16)
2752 Points ∼30% -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=357)
4997 Points ∼55% -7%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3742 Points ∼34%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
5154 Points ∼47% +38%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6194 Points ∼56% +66%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2695 Points ∼25% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
4050 Points ∼37% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼100% +194%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (0 - 4711, n=12)
3134 Points ∼29% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=525)
5466 Points ∼50% +46%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
677 Points ∼18%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
915 Points ∼24% +35%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
763 Points ∼20% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼100% +455%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (573 - 677, n=15)
490 Points ∼13% -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=372)
1830 Points ∼49% +170%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
189 Points ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
325 Points ∼5% +72%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
260 Points ∼4% +38%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼100% +3644%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (75 - 189, n=15)
78 Points ∼1% -59%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=372)
1598 Points ∼23% +746%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
225 Points ∼4%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
397 Points ∼7% +76%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
305 Points ∼5% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼100% +2528%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (93 - 225, n=15)
95.5 Points ∼2% -58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=375)
1484 Points ∼25% +560%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
698 Points ∼18%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
904 Points ∼24% +30%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
885 Points ∼23% +27%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
807 Points ∼21% +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
853 Points ∼23% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼100% +443%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (530 - 698, n=15)
572 Points ∼15% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=386)
1805 Points ∼48% +159%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
189 Points ∼2%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
496 Points ∼5% +162%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
250 Points ∼2% +32%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
445 Points ∼4% +135%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
248 Points ∼2% +31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼100% +5345%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (131 - 189, n=15)
148 Points ∼1% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=386)
2194 Points ∼21% +1061%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
225 Points ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
551 Points ∼7% +145%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
297 Points ∼4% +32%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
494 Points ∼7% +120%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
294 Points ∼4% +31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼100% +3211%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (159 - 225, n=15)
176 Points ∼2% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=387)
1860 Points ∼25% +727%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
690 Points ∼18%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
932 Points ∼25% +35%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
828 Points ∼22% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼100% +445%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (486 - 690, n=16)
526 Points ∼14% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=448)
1760 Points ∼47% +155%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
185 Points ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
82 Points ∼1% -56%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
225 Points ∼4% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% +3335%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (65 - 185, n=16)
79.5 Points ∼1% -57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=450)
1324 Points ∼21% +616%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
221 Points ∼4%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
103 Points ∼2% -53%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
268 Points ∼5% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼100% +2393%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (80 - 221, n=16)
97.8 Points ∼2% -56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=458)
1262 Points ∼23% +471%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
690 Points ∼19%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
1006 Points ∼28% +46%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
892 Points ∼25% +29%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
840 Points ∼23% +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
878 Points ∼24% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼100% +424%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (445 - 690, n=15)
561 Points ∼16% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=480)
1667 Points ∼46% +142%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
185 Points ∼2%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
109 Points ∼1% -41%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
46 Points ∼0% -75%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
403 Points ∼4% +118%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
43 Points ∼0% -77%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +5285%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (102 - 185, n=15)
128 Points ∼1% -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=480)
1801 Points ∼18% +874%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
211 Points ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
136 Points ∼2% -36%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
58 Points ∼1% -73%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
456 Points ∼6% +116%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
55 Points ∼1% -74%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼100% +3296%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (120 - 211, n=15)
153 Points ∼2% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=488)
1541 Points ∼22% +630%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
10981 Points ∼43%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
9979 Points ∼39% -9%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10427 Points ∼41% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
14128 Points ∼56% +29%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
8093 Points ∼32% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10188 Points ∼40% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼100% +131%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (7103 - 10981, n=15)
9375 Points ∼37% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=640)
13636 Points ∼54% +24%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3700 Points ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
8856 Points ∼8% +139%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5487 Points ∼5% +48%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6785 Points ∼6% +83%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2469 Points ∼2% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5391 Points ∼5% +46%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼100% +2779%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (2878 - 4346, n=15)
3363 Points ∼3% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11427 - 162695, n=640)
19988 Points ∼19% +440%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
4339 Points ∼7%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
9085 Points ∼15% +109%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6133 Points ∼10% +41%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7671 Points ∼12% +77%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2920 Points ∼5% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6021 Points ∼10% +39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼100% +1334%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (3392 - 4339, n=15)
3870 Points ∼6% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11565 - 83518, n=641)
16573 Points ∼27% +282%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
6.1 fps ∼4%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼10% +162%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼5% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
13 fps ∼8% +113%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
4.4 fps ∼3% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼5% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +2638%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (4.9 - 6.1, n=16)
5.61 fps ∼3% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=669)
35 fps ∼21% +474%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
15 fps ∼25%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼27% +7%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
14 fps ∼23% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
19 fps ∼32% +27%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
11 fps ∼18% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
13 fps ∼22% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +300%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (8.2 - 15, n=16)
9.84 fps ∼16% -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=672)
26.9 fps ∼45% +79%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.7 fps ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
7.1 fps ∼7% +163%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
2.7 fps ∼3% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.3 fps ∼6% +133%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100% +3604%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (2.2 - 2.8, n=14)
2.56 fps ∼3% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=588)
19.3 fps ∼19% +615%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
10 fps ∼17%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps ∼13% -25%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6.1 fps ∼10% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
12 fps ∼20% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5.6 fps ∼9% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +500%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (4.4 - 10, n=16)
5.61 fps ∼9% -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=593)
17.8 fps ∼30% +78%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.7 fps ∼2%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
4.7 fps ∼7% +176%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4 fps ∼6% +135%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +3959%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1.3 - 1.7, n=16)
1.494 fps ∼2% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=449)
15.9 fps ∼23% +835%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
6.7 fps ∼12%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
5 fps ∼9% -25%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7.5 fps ∼13% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +766%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (2.6 - 6.7, n=16)
3.51 fps ∼6% -48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=452)
15.2 fps ∼26% +127%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2 fps ∼8%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
1.5 fps ∼6% -25%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.7 fps ∼11% +35%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +1100%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (0.61 - 2, n=4)
1.028 fps ∼4% -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=152)
8.97 fps ∼37% +349%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.4 fps ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
0.9 fps ∼6% +125%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
0.85 fps ∼5% +113%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +3900%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (0.35 - 0.4, n=4)
0.24 fps ∼2% -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=152)
6.2 fps ∼39% +1450%
Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.5 fps ∼7%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.2 fps ∼6% -12%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.3 fps ∼12% +72%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +1380%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1.4 - 2.5, n=5)
2 fps ∼5% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=154)
13.5 fps ∼36% +440%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.6 fps ∼1%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.3 fps ∼6% +283%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.3 (min: 4.3) fps ∼6% +283%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼100% +6733%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (0.6 - 0.95, n=5)
0.804 fps ∼2% +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=153)
14.8 fps ∼36% +2367%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.6 fps ∼1%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.5 fps ∼6% +317%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.9 fps ∼5% +217%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +6900%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (0.6 - 0.91, n=14)
0.826 fps ∼2% +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=378)
10.7 fps ∼25% +1683%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.6 fps ∼7%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.8 fps ∼7% +8%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.2 fps ∼8% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +1362%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1.1 - 2.6, n=15)
1.553 fps ∼4% -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=382)
9.65 fps ∼25% +271%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
46951 Points ∼13%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
54871 Points ∼15% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
61753 Points ∼16% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +698%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (0 - 46951, n=14)
38996 Points ∼10% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=270)
130378 Points ∼35% +178%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
624 Points ∼45%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
649 Points ∼47% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
733 Points ∼53% +17%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
587 Points ∼43% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼100% +121%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (7 - 624, n=15)
165 Points ∼12% -74%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=600)
741 Points ∼54% +19%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
190 Points ∼2%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
641 Points ∼7% +237%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
428 Points ∼5% +125%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
482 Points ∼5% +154%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
145 Points ∼2% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
426 Points ∼5% +124%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼100% +4779%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (18 - 190, n=15)
161 Points ∼2% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=600)
1942 Points ∼21% +922%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
818 Points ∼20%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
983 Points ∼24% +20%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
502 Points ∼12% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
607 Points ∼15% -26%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
266 Points ∼7% -67%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
363 Points ∼9% -56%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼100% +393%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (420 - 1039, n=15)
768 Points ∼19% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=600)
1446 Points ∼36% +77%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1338 Points ∼16%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
1931 Points ∼23% +44%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1228 Points ∼15% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1434 Points ∼17% +7%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
957 Points ∼11% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1210 Points ∼14% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼100% +531%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1103 - 1526, n=15)
1294 Points ∼15% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=600)
2852 Points ∼34% +113%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
600 Points ∼13%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
330 Points ∼7% -45%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
643 Points ∼14% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
745 Points ∼16% +24%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
384 Points ∼8% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
207 Points ∼5% -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼100% +666%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (162 - 637, n=15)
291 Points ∼6% -51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=604)
1418 Points ∼31% +136%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.207 Points ∼100% +426%
Average of class Smartphone (14.6 - 108, n=79)
30.7 Points ∼54% +182%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
16.254 Points ∼28% +49%
Oukitel C13 Pro (Chrome 73)
10.876 Points ∼19%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (10.4 - 10.9, n=2)
10.6 Points ∼19% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 74)
Points ∼0% -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼100% +685%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=661)
6268 Points ∼26% +101%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
4865 Points ∼20% +56%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
4332 Points ∼18% +39%
Oukitel U25 Pro (Chrome Version 72)
3303 Points ∼13% +6%
Oukitel C13 Pro (Chrome 73)
3126 Points ∼13%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2093 - 3386, n=15)
2945 Points ∼12% -6%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
2503 Points ∼10% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)
2411 Points ∼10% -23%
Cubot J3
Points ∼0% -100%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Cubot J3 (Chrome 73)
19183 ms * ∼100% -25%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (13599 - 18154, n=16)
16427 ms * ∼86% -7%
Oukitel C13 Pro (Chrome 73)
15334.7 ms * ∼80%
Oukitel U25 Pro (Chrome Version 72)
14543.1 ms * ∼76% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)
13899 ms * ∼72% +9%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
13821 ms * ∼72% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=681)
10805 ms * ∼56% +30%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
10739.7 ms * ∼56% +30%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
10256.9 ms * ∼53% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼10% +88%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Oukitel C13 ProOukitel U25 ProNokia 2.1Xiaomi Redmi 6ACubot J3Xiaomi Redmi GoXiaomi Mi 9Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
62%
23%
96%
-63%
19%
679%
-29%
31%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.05
54.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-13%
61.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
15.9 (Kingston 32GB)
-74%
63.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
38.6 (6.38 - 65.7, n=128)
-38%
48.6 (9.5 - 87.1, n=403)
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.25
71.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
79.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
8.1 (Kingston 32GB)
-90%
84.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
57.5 (8.1 - 87.7, n=128)
-29%
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=403)
-18%
Random Write 4KB
9.99
16.76
68%
13.45
35%
52.23
423%
5.5
-45%
11.9
19%
165.32
1555%
7.74 (0.49 - 43.2, n=243)
-23%
20.1 (0.14 - 250, n=710)
101%
Random Read 4KB
22.98
55.95
143%
50.46
120%
33.94
48%
14.6
-36%
45.4
98%
149.36
550%
21 (2.49 - 62.1, n=243)
-9%
44.7 (1.59 - 175, n=710)
95%
Sequential Write 256KB
69.7
195.1
180%
51.18
-27%
131.67
89%
12.1
-83%
54.8
-21%
388.27
457%
42.2 (8.74 - 106, n=243)
-39%
92 (2.99 - 503, n=710)
32%
Sequential Read 256KB
264.76
284.34
7%
288.26
9%
277.54
5%
130.6
-51%
289.3
9%
666.06
152%
163 (9.66 - 294, n=243)
-38%
258 (12.1 - 1468, n=710)
-3%
 33.4 °C32.9 °C31.1 °C 
 33 °C31.1 °C32.1 °C 
 31 °C29.5 °C31.5 °C 
Maximum: 33.4 °C
Moyenne: 31.7 °C
29.4 °C29.9 °C35.9 °C
28.8 °C30.1 °C34.7 °C
27.8 °C30.4 °C33.6 °C
Maximum: 35.9 °C
Moyenne: 31.2 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  32.6 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.536.32523.730.53125.828.54022.2265033.128.86326.621.48024.220.610023.321.812521.816.616022.520.220018.223.925016.334.731515.646.440015.15250014.155.763013.960.780013.669100014.872.7125013.675160013.674.3200013.871.2250014.373315014.674.3400014.580.4500014.677.6630014.872.3800014.673.31000014.969.11250014.9571600014.942.2SPL26.686.5N0.861.6median 14.8median 69Delta1.51619.929.620.223.721.42622.925.626.933.418.220.722.820.819.121.315.817.516.52014.217.713.326.315.334.314.64214.748.414.555.713.76514.472.713.973.813.971.113.867.313.869.314.268.914.37014.671.414.674.214.379.31579.71573.314.759.926.384.70.855median 14.5median 67.30.716.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOukitel C13 ProOukitel U25 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oukitel C13 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 41.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Oukitel U25 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 44.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.18 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 1.33 / 2.53 / 2.58 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 3.18 / 4.15 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oukitel C13 Pro
3000 mAh
Oukitel U25 Pro
3200 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Cubot J3
2000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Go
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6739
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-27%
22%
24%
6%
-7%
2%
-21%
4%
Idle Minimum *
1.33
1.47
-11%
0.7
47%
0.7
47%
0.7
47%
1.2
10%
0.67
50%
1.522 (0.87 - 2.8, n=16)
-14%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=742)
34%
Idle Average *
2.53
2.88
-14%
1.2
53%
1.2
53%
1.5
41%
1.9
25%
1.26
50%
2.17 (1.6 - 3.5, n=16)
14%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=741)
32%
Idle Maximum *
2.58
2.96
-15%
1.9
26%
2
22%
2
22%
2.5
3%
1.29
50%
2.86 (1.68 - 6.3, n=16)
-11%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=742)
22%
Load Average *
3.18
4.74
-49%
3.2
-1%
3.4
-7%
4.6
-45%
4.5
-42%
3.71
-17%
4.73 (2.8 - 7, n=16)
-49%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=736)
-28%
Load Maximum *
4.15
5.99
-44%
4.8
-16%
4
4%
5.6
-35%
5.5
-33%
9.3
-124%
5.99 (3.5 - 11.9, n=16)
-44%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=736)
-42%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
7h 9min
Oukitel C13 Pro
3000 mAh
Oukitel U25 Pro
3200 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Cubot J3
2000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Go
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3
429
491
14%
809
89%
761
77%
432
1%
749
75%
546
27%

Points positifs

+ prix
+ qualité de construction
+ écran IPS, contraste

Points négatifs

- lent
- RAM
- stockage
- résolution

Verdict

En test : l'Oukitel C13 Pro. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Oukitel.
En test : l'Oukitel C13 Pro. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Oukitel.

Le C13 Pro du fabricant chinois Oukitel est sur les rangs des appareils à moins de 100 €. Cependant, à la différence de son cousin le U25 Pro, que nous avions recommandé, et qui coûte légèrement plus, le C13 Pro ne parvient pas à séduire. L’écran sombre et à la faible résolution n’est plus adapté, même pour un smartphone aussi peu cher. L’appareil photo est également à la traîne.

Avec son smartphone de 6,18 pouces, Oukitel semble avoir réduit les coûts aux mauvais endroits.

L’appareil, fait en plastique, est agréable à tenir en main. Grâce à la faible densité de pixels, le SoC plutôt peu puissant, parvient à proposer de bonnes performances - le C13 Pro peut même faire tourner les jeux actuels du Google Play Store.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Oukitel C13 Pro - 04/26/2019 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Châssis
80%
Clavier
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositif de pointage
78%
Connectivité
36 / 60 → 60%
Poids
90%
Autonomie
89%
Écran
78%
Performances en jeu
11 / 63 → 17%
Performances dans les applications
37 / 70 → 52%
Chauffe
93%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 61%
Appareil photo
48%
Moyenne
66%
75%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du smartphone Oukitel C13 Pro
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-05- 1 (Update: 2019-05- 1)