Notebookcheck

Courte critique du smartphone Oukitel C15 Pro : un téléphone bas de gamme avec écran lumineux

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduit par Prévots), 06/24/2019

Petit prix. L’Oukitel C15 Pro à moins de 100 € nous a surpris avec son écran IPS lumineux. Lisez ce rapport de test pour voir si ce smartphone à petit prix a plus à offrir que son écran réussi.

Oukitel C15 Pro (C Gamme)
Processeur
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
Carte graphique
PowerVR GE8300
Mémoire
2048 Mo 
Écran
6.09 pouces 19.2:9, 1280 x 600 pixel 232 PPP, capacitif, IPS LCD, brillant: oui
Disque dur
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 Go 
, 10.6 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD jusqu'à 128 Go, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, capteur de proximité, OTG, radio FM
Réseau
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G/GSM : 850, 900, 1 800, 1 900 MHz ; B5, B8, B3, B2. 3G/WCDMA : 900, 2 100 MHz ; B1, B8. 4G/FDD-LTE : 800, 900, 1 800, 2 100, 2 600 MHz ; B1, B3, B7, B8, B20., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.9 x 155.6 x 73.3
Batterie
3200 mAh Lithium-Ion
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 8 MPix + 2 MP, appareil photo 2 API: limité
Appareil photo secondaire: 5 MPix
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, protection d'écran, chargeur, câble micro USB, coque en silicone, guide de démarrage rapide, Oukitel UI, 12 Mois Garantie, LTE Cat. 4 (150 Mbit/s / 51 Mbit/s), DRM Widevine : L3., fanless
Poids
174 g, Alimentation: 51 g
Prix
90 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Oukitel C15 Pro
Oukitel C15 Pro

Comparaison des tailles

155.6 mm 73.3 mm 8.9 mm 174 g156.28 mm 73.5 mm 8 mm 150 g155.5 mm 76 mm 8.3 mm 177 g153.8 mm 76 mm 9.8 mm 180 g153.6 mm 77.6 mm 9.7 mm 174 g147.5 mm 71.5 mm 8.3 mm 145 g146.5 mm 70.9 mm 8.3 mm 145 g140.4 mm 70.1 mm 8.35 mm 137 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=409)
222 MBit/s ∼100% +192%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
91.2 (min: 44, max: 108) MBit/s ∼41% +20%
Oukitel C13 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
84 (min: 7, max: 105) MBit/s ∼38% +11%
Oukitel C15 Pro
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 16 GB eMMC Flash
76 (min: 52, max: 101) MBit/s ∼34%
Huawei Y6 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
69 (min: 61, max: 66) MBit/s ∼31% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
59.6 (min: 56, max: 61) MBit/s ∼27% -22%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.5 (min: 48, max: 55) MBit/s ∼25% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 (min: 46, max: 58) MBit/s ∼25% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 (min: 29, max: 54) MBit/s ∼22% -36%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=409)
212 MBit/s ∼100% +207%
Oukitel C13 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
94 (min: 34, max: 102) MBit/s ∼44% +36%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
85.6 (min: 42, max: 106) MBit/s ∼40% +24%
Oukitel C15 Pro
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 16 GB eMMC Flash
69 (min: 31, max: 77) MBit/s ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
56.6 (min: 48, max: 61) MBit/s ∼27% -18%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 (min: 52, max: 59) MBit/s ∼26% -19%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
52.7 (min: 27, max: 58) MBit/s ∼25% -24%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.3 (min: 48, max: 55) MBit/s ∼25% -24%
Huawei Y6 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
37.8 (min: 29, max: 46) MBit/s ∼18% -45%
Oukitel C15 Pro - Standard.
Oukitel C15 Pro - Standard.
Oukitel C15 Pro - Mode portrait.
Oukitel C15 Pro - Mode portrait.
Oukitel C15 Pro - Mode Monochrome.
Oukitel C15 Pro - Mode Monochrome.
Oukitel C15 Pro - Réglages de l'appareil photo.
Oukitel C15 Pro - Réglages de l'appareil photo.
Oukitel C15 Pro - Réglages de l'appareil photo.
Oukitel C15 Pro - Réglages de l'appareil photo.
Oukitel C15 Pro - Viseur.
Oukitel C15 Pro - Viseur.
Oukitel C15 Pro - Mode Pro.
Oukitel C15 Pro - Mode Pro.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
Oukitel C15 Pro - Mire de test.
Oukitel C15 Pro - Mire de test.
Oukitel C15 Pro - Détail de la mire de test.
Oukitel C15 Pro - Mire de test en faible luminosité.
Oukitel C15 Pro - ColorChecker Passport : la couleur de référence se situe dans la partie inférieure de chaque bloc.
693
cd/m²
640
cd/m²
596
cd/m²
684
cd/m²
674
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
676
cd/m²
655
cd/m²
641
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 693 cd/m² Moyenne: 653.7 cd/m² Minimum: 24.8 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 86 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 674 cd/m²
Contraste: 1204:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.3 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
89.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Oukitel C15 Pro
IPS LCD, 1280x600, 6.09
Oukitel C13 Pro
IPS LCD, 996x480, 6.18
Oukitel U25 Pro
IPS LCD, 1920x1080, 5.5
TP-Link Neffos C9A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Nokia 2.1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Xiaomi Redmi Go
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Huawei Y6 2019
IPS LCD, 1560x720, 6.09
Screen
-43%
-24%
9%
-12%
-15%
3%
2%
Brightness middle
674
388
-42%
649
-4%
535
-21%
338
-50%
340
-50%
404
-40%
487
-28%
Brightness
654
402
-39%
623
-5%
528
-19%
327
-50%
309
-53%
400
-39%
485
-26%
Brightness Distribution
86
88
2%
90
5%
96
12%
82
-5%
77
-10%
82
-5%
89
3%
Black Level *
0.56
0.26
54%
0.56
-0%
0.42
25%
0.27
52%
0.28
50%
0.26
54%
0.35
37%
Contrast
1204
1492
24%
1159
-4%
1274
6%
1252
4%
1214
1%
1554
29%
1391
16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.3
9.2
-74%
7.1
-34%
4.18
21%
5.36
-1%
5.53
-4%
4.28
19%
4.3
19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.2
18.4
-124%
12.6
-54%
9.62
-17%
9.77
-19%
9.87
-20%
9.97
-22%
10.1
-23%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.8
11.7
-144%
9.4
-96%
1.7
65%
6.2
-29%
6.4
-33%
3.5
27%
4.1
15%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.58 85%
2.1 105%
2.345 94%
2.275 97%
2.213 99%
2.09 105%
CCT
7475 87%
11121 58%
8629 75%
6502 100%
8460 77%
8198 79%
6899 94%
7312 89%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9429 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
24 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 6.8 ms hausse
↘ 17.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (25.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
51.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 15.6 ms hausse
↘ 35.6 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (40.2 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
5054 Points ∼56%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
5377 Points ∼60% +6%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
3850 Points ∼43% -24%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3126 Points ∼35% -38%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3146 Points ∼35% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3192 Points ∼35% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
5511 Points ∼61% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼100% +79%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (4195 - 5511, n=3)
4920 Points ∼54% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=357)
4997 Points ∼55% -1%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7216 Points ∼66%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3742 Points ∼34% -48%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
5154 Points ∼47% -29%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
4050 Points ∼37% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6194 Points ∼56% -14%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4229 Points ∼38% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼100% +52%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (4229 - 7216, n=3)
5687 Points ∼52% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=525)
5466 Points ∼50% -24%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
954 Points ∼25%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
698 Points ∼18% -27%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
904 Points ∼24% -5%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
627 Points ∼17% -34%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
885 Points ∼23% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
853 Points ∼23% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
807 Points ∼21% -15%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
889 Points ∼23% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼100% +297%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (889 - 954, n=3)
922 Points ∼24% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=386)
1805 Points ∼48% +89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
461 Points ∼4%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
189 Points ∼2% -59%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
496 Points ∼5% +8%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
169 Points ∼2% -63%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
250 Points ∼2% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
248 Points ∼2% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
445 Points ∼4% -3%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
450 Points ∼4% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼100% +2132%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (450 - 461, n=3)
454 Points ∼4% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=386)
2194 Points ∼21% +376%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
521 Points ∼7%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
225 Points ∼3% -57%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
551 Points ∼7% +6%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
202 Points ∼3% -61%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
297 Points ∼4% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
294 Points ∼4% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
494 Points ∼7% -5%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
505 Points ∼7% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼100% +1330%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (505 - 521, n=3)
512 Points ∼7% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=387)
1860 Points ∼25% +257%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
923 Points ∼26%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
690 Points ∼19% -25%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
1006 Points ∼28% +9%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
641 Points ∼18% -31%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
892 Points ∼25% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
878 Points ∼24% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
840 Points ∼23% -9%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
869 Points ∼24% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼100% +292%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (869 - 923, n=3)
901 Points ∼25% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=480)
1667 Points ∼46% +81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
434 Points ∼4%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
185 Points ∼2% -57%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
109 Points ∼1% -75%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
145 Points ∼1% -67%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
46 Points ∼0% -89%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
43 Points ∼0% -90%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
403 Points ∼4% -7%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
357 Points ∼4% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +2196%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (357 - 434, n=3)
384 Points ∼4% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=480)
1801 Points ∼18% +315%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
492 Points ∼7%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
211 Points ∼3% -57%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
136 Points ∼2% -72%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
175 Points ∼2% -64%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
58 Points ∼1% -88%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
55 Points ∼1% -89%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
456 Points ∼6% -7%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
411 Points ∼6% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼100% +1357%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (411 - 492, n=3)
440 Points ∼6% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=488)
1541 Points ∼22% +213%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
15348 Points ∼61%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
10981 Points ∼43% -28%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
9979 Points ∼39% -35%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
9513 Points ∼38% -38%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10427 Points ∼41% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10188 Points ∼40% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
14128 Points ∼56% -8%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
14037 Points ∼55% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼100% +65%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (14037 - 15348, n=3)
14796 Points ∼58% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=640)
13636 Points ∼54% -11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7695 Points ∼7%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3700 Points ∼3% -52%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
8856 Points ∼8% +15%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3588 Points ∼3% -53%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5487 Points ∼5% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5391 Points ∼5% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6785 Points ∼6% -12%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7567 Points ∼7% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼100% +1284%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (7514 - 7695, n=3)
7592 Points ∼7% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11427 - 162695, n=640)
19988 Points ∼19% +160%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
8657 Points ∼14%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
4339 Points ∼7% -50%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
9085 Points ∼15% +5%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
4164 Points ∼7% -52%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6133 Points ∼10% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6021 Points ∼10% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7671 Points ∼12% -11%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
8431 Points ∼14% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼100% +619%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (8431 - 8657, n=3)
8513 Points ∼14% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11565 - 83518, n=641)
16573 Points ∼27% +91%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
14 fps ∼8%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
6.1 fps ∼4% -56%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼10% +14%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
6 fps ∼4% -57%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼5% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼5% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
13 fps ∼8% -7%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
14 fps ∼8% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +1093%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (14 - 14, n=3)
14 fps ∼8% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=669)
35 fps ∼21% +150%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
22 fps ∼37%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
15 fps ∼25% -32%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼27% -27%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
9.9 fps ∼17% -55%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
14 fps ∼23% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
13 fps ∼22% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
19 fps ∼32% -14%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
20 fps ∼33% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +173%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (20 - 22, n=3)
21 fps ∼35% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=672)
26.9 fps ∼45% +22%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
6.6 fps ∼7%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.7 fps ∼3% -59%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
7.1 fps ∼7% +8%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.7 fps ∼3% -59%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
2.7 fps ∼3% -59%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.3 fps ∼6% -5%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
6.5 fps ∼7% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100% +1415%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (6.5 - 6.6, n=3)
6.53 fps ∼7% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=588)
19.3 fps ∼19% +192%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
15 fps ∼25%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
10 fps ∼17% -33%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps ∼13% -50%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
5.4 fps ∼9% -64%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6.1 fps ∼10% -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5.6 fps ∼9% -63%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
12 fps ∼20% -20%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
11 fps ∼18% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +300%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (11 - 15, n=3)
12.7 fps ∼21% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=593)
17.8 fps ∼30% +19%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.5 fps ∼4%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.7 fps ∼2% -32%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
4.7 fps ∼7% +88%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.6 fps ∼2% -36%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4 fps ∼6% +60%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.2 fps ∼6% +68%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +2660%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (2.5 - 4.3, n=3)
3.67 fps ∼5% +47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=449)
15.9 fps ∼23% +536%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
11 fps ∼19%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
6.7 fps ∼12% -39%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
5 fps ∼9% -55%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3.4 fps ∼6% -69%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7.5 fps ∼13% -32%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7.6 fps ∼13% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +427%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (7.6 - 11, n=3)
8.8 fps ∼15% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=452)
15.2 fps ∼26% +38%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
3.7 fps ∼15%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2 fps ∼8% -46%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
1.5 fps ∼6% -59%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.64 fps ∼3% -83%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.7 fps ∼11% -27%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.7 fps ∼11% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +549%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (2.7 - 3.7, n=3)
3.07 fps ∼13% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=152)
8.97 fps ∼37% +142%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
0.8 fps ∼5%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.4 fps ∼3% -50%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
0.9 fps ∼6% +13%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
fps ∼0% -100%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
0.85 fps ∼5% +6%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
0.8 fps ∼5% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +1900%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (0.8 - 0.8, n=3)
0.8 fps ∼5% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=152)
6.2 fps ∼39% +675%
Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
5.8 fps ∼16%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.5 fps ∼7% -57%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.2 fps ∼6% -62%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.8 fps ∼5% -69%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.3 fps ∼12% -26%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.3 fps ∼6% -60%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +538%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (2.3 - 5.8, n=3)
4.13 fps ∼11% -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=154)
13.5 fps ∼36% +133%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
3.4 fps ∼8%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.6 fps ∼1% -82%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.3 fps ∼6% -32%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.95 fps ∼2% -72%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.3 (min: 4.3) fps ∼6% -32%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.2 fps ∼10% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼100% +1106%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (2.3 - 4.2, n=3)
3.3 fps ∼8% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=153)
14.8 fps ∼36% +335%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2 fps ∼5%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.6 fps ∼1% -70%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.5 fps ∼6% +25%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.88 fps ∼2% -56%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.9 fps ∼5% -5%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2 fps ∼5% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +2000%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (2 - 2, n=3)
2 fps ∼5% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=378)
10.7 fps ∼25% +435%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.1 fps ∼11%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.6 fps ∼7% -37%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.8 fps ∼7% -32%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.5 fps ∼4% -63%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.2 fps ∼8% -22%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
3.1 fps ∼8% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +827%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (3.1 - 4.1, n=3)
3.47 fps ∼9% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=382)
9.65 fps ∼25% +135%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
3.09 (min: 1.56, max: 7.87) fps ∼8%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37.41 fps ∼100% +1111%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (3.09 - 3.09, n=2)
1.545 fps ∼4% -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.53 - 651, n=62)
25.4 fps ∼68% +722%
Vulkan Medium Native (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
fps ∼0%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
fps ∼0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32.2 fps ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
 
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.91 - 606, n=57)
22.5 fps ∼70%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
fps ∼0%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
fps ∼0%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
fps ∼0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35.63 fps ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (0 - 0, n=2)
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.2 - 739, n=57)
27 fps ∼76%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
64782 Points ∼17%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
46951 Points ∼13% -28%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
54871 Points ∼15% -15%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
36768 Points ∼10% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
61753 Points ∼16% -5%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
64157 Points ∼17% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +479%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (63421 - 64782, n=3)
64120 Points ∼17% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=270)
130378 Points ∼35% +101%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
857 Points ∼62%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
624 Points ∼45% -27%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
10 Points ∼1% -99%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
649 Points ∼47% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
733 Points ∼53% -14%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
785 Points ∼57% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼100% +61%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (775 - 857, n=3)
806 Points ∼58% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=600)
741 Points ∼54% -14%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
475 Points ∼5%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
190 Points ∼2% -60%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
641 Points ∼7% +35%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
186 Points ∼2% -61%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
428 Points ∼5% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
426 Points ∼5% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
482 Points ∼5% +1%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
470 Points ∼5% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼100% +1852%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (470 - 475, n=3)
472 Points ∼5% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=600)
1942 Points ∼21% +309%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
531 Points ∼13%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
818 Points ∼20% +54%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
983 Points ∼24% +85%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1039 Points ∼26% +96%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
502 Points ∼12% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
363 Points ∼9% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
607 Points ∼15% +14%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1458 Points ∼36% +175%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼100% +659%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (531 - 1458, n=3)
1137 Points ∼28% +114%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=600)
1446 Points ∼36% +172%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1419 Points ∼17%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1338 Points ∼16% -6%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
1931 Points ∼23% +36%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1425 Points ∼17% 0%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1228 Points ∼15% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1210 Points ∼14% -15%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1434 Points ∼17% +1%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1755 Points ∼21% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼100% +495%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (1419 - 1798, n=3)
1657 Points ∼20% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=600)
2852 Points ∼34% +101%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
744 Points ∼16%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
600 Points ∼13% -19%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
330 Points ∼7% -56%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
227 Points ∼5% -69%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
643 Points ∼14% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
207 Points ∼5% -72%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
745 Points ∼16% 0%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
986 Points ∼21% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼100% +518%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (744 - 986, n=3)
904 Points ∼20% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=604)
1418 Points ∼31% +91%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
102 Points ∼7%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
93 Points ∼7% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1415 Points ∼100% +1287%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
 
102 Points ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=102)
709 Points ∼50% +595%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.207 Points ∼100% +270%
Average of class Smartphone (14.6 - 108, n=79)
30.7 Points ∼54% +98%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (15.3 - 15.7, n=3)
15.5 Points ∼27% 0%
Oukitel C15 Pro (Chrome 74)
15.467 Points ∼27%
Huawei Y6 2019
15.326 Points ∼27% -1%
Oukitel C13 Pro (Chrome 73)
10.876 Points ∼19% -30%
TP-Link Neffos C9A (Chrome 73)
10.39 Points ∼18% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 74)
Points ∼0% -100%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
65.7 runs/min ∼100% +321%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=71)
34.6 runs/min ∼53% +122%
Huawei Y6 2019 (Chrome)
15.69 runs/min ∼24% +1%
Oukitel C15 Pro (Chrome 74)
15.6 runs/min ∼24%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (14.7 - 15.7, n=3)
15.3 runs/min ∼23% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 74)
11.57 runs/min ∼18% -26%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼100% +227%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=132)
63.5 Points ∼59% +92%
Huawei Y6 2019
35 Points ∼32% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (33 - 35, n=3)
34.3 Points ∼32% +4%
Oukitel C15 Pro (Chrome 74)
33 Points ∼31%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
30 Points ∼28% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)
24 Points ∼22% -27%
TP-Link Neffos C9A (Chrome 73)
23 Points ∼21% -30%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼100% +448%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=661)
6268 Points ∼26% +40%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (4437 - 4603, n=3)
4505 Points ∼18% +1%
Oukitel C15 Pro (Chrome 74)
4474 Points ∼18%
Huawei Y6 2019 (Chrome)
4437 Points ∼18% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
4332 Points ∼18% -3%
Oukitel U25 Pro (Chrome Version 72)
3303 Points ∼13% -26%
TP-Link Neffos C9A (Chrome 73)
3167 Points ∼13% -29%
Oukitel C13 Pro (Chrome 73)
3126 Points ∼13% -30%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
2503 Points ∼10% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)
2411 Points ∼10% -46%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
TP-Link Neffos C9A (Chrome 73)
15556.6 ms * ∼100% -48%
Oukitel C13 Pro (Chrome 73)
15334.7 ms * ∼99% -46%
Oukitel U25 Pro (Chrome Version 72)
14543.1 ms * ∼93% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)
13899 ms * ∼89% -32%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
13821 ms * ∼89% -31%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=681)
10805 ms * ∼69% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
10739.7 ms * ∼69% -2%
Oukitel C15 Pro (Chrome 74)
10531.3 ms * ∼68%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (10198 - 10531, n=3)
10364 ms * ∼67% +2%
Huawei Y6 2019
10198 ms * ∼66% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼12% +82%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Oukitel C15 ProOukitel C13 ProOukitel U25 ProTP-Link Neffos C9ANokia 2.1Xiaomi Redmi GoXiaomi Redmi 6AHuawei Y6 2019Xiaomi Mi 9Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
34%
140%
41%
51%
46%
223%
98%
1259%
-7%
86%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.05
0%
54.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-13%
62.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
61.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
63.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
64.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
38.6 (6.38 - 65.7, n=128)
-38%
48.6 (9.5 - 87.1, n=403)
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.46 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
81.25
-3%
71.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-14%
82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
79.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
84.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
83.16 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
57.5 (8.1 - 87.7, n=128)
-31%
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=403)
-20%
Random Write 4KB
4.78
9.99
109%
16.76
251%
12.2
155%
13.45
181%
11.9
149%
52.23
993%
15
214%
165.32
3359%
7.74 (0.49 - 43.2, n=243)
62%
20.1 (0.14 - 250, n=711)
321%
Random Read 4KB
32.77
22.98
-30%
55.95
71%
43.11
32%
50.46
54%
45.4
39%
33.94
4%
69
111%
149.36
356%
21 (2.49 - 62.1, n=243)
-36%
44.8 (1.59 - 175, n=711)
37%
Sequential Write 256KB
30.55
69.7
128%
195.1
539%
49.64
62%
51.18
68%
54.8
79%
131.67
331%
107.78
253%
388.27
1171%
42.2 (8.74 - 106, n=243)
38%
92.1 (2.99 - 503, n=711)
201%
Sequential Read 256KB
267.24
264.76
-1%
284.34
6%
259.86
-3%
288.26
8%
289.3
8%
277.54
4%
279.26
4%
666.06
149%
163 (9.66 - 294, n=243)
-39%
258 (12.1 - 1468, n=711)
-3%
Asphalt 8 Airborne
0102030Tooltip
: Ø16.9 (10-22)
Asphalt 9 Legends
010Tooltip
: Ø7.41 (3-10)
Dead Trigger 2
010203040Tooltip
: Ø30 (25-31)
 32.5 °C32.6 °C36.4 °C 
 32.1 °C32.4 °C36.3 °C 
 30.5 °C31.5 °C34.7 °C 
Maximum: 36.4 °C
Moyenne: 33.2 °C
29.7 °C29.9 °C31.6 °C
29.5 °C30.8 °C32 °C
29.6 °C29.9 °C31.8 °C
Maximum: 32 °C
Moyenne: 30.5 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  32.4 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.837.72525.531.93127.526.34022.321.55028.5346318.924.78020.223.810021.623.112518.719.416020.220.520017.118.525014.629.531515.939.340015.444.550016.552.263014.257.680014.563.9100013.369.2125013.469.6160013.669.6200014.268.2250014.669315013.671.8400014.474.5500014.571.7630014.266.5800014.661.51000014.858.41250014.952.71600015.242.6SPL26.581.4N0.844.6median 14.6median 58.4Delta0.81645.346.149.352.937.839.237.539.542.143.235.336.428.72925.930.529.128.826.830.823.438.522.745.822.151.920.756.620.965.319.270.918.67219.970.318.371.318.674.617.975.817.975.517.572.217.561.817.463.117.368.917.569.817.567.717.659.417.65268.830.883.722.41.554.9median 18.6median 65.32.410.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOukitel C15 ProXiaomi Redmi Go
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oukitel C15 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Redmi Go audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.03 / 0.14 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.66 / 2.42 / 2.44 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 3.43 / 4.76 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oukitel C15 Pro
3200 mAh
Oukitel C13 Pro
3000 mAh
Oukitel U25 Pro
3200 mAh
TP-Link Neffos C9A
3020 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Go
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-19%
-45%
-19%
14%
-22%
16%
-2%
3%
-6%
Idle Minimum *
0.66
1.33
-102%
1.47
-123%
1.4
-112%
0.7
-6%
1.2
-82%
0.7
-6%
0.67
-2%
0.817 (0.59 - 1.2, n=3)
-24%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=743)
-33%
Idle Average *
2.42
2.53
-5%
2.88
-19%
1.6
34%
1.2
50%
1.9
21%
1.2
50%
1.26
48%
2.09 (1.9 - 2.42, n=3)
14%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=742)
28%
Idle Maximum *
2.44
2.58
-6%
2.96
-21%
2.2
10%
1.9
22%
2.5
-2%
2
18%
1.29
47%
2.27 (1.96 - 2.44, n=3)
7%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=743)
17%
Load Average *
3.43
3.18
7%
4.74
-38%
4.2
-22%
3.2
7%
4.5
-31%
3.4
1%
3.71
-8%
3.18 (2.82 - 3.43, n=3)
7%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=737)
-18%
Load Maximum *
4.76
4.15
13%
5.99
-26%
4.9
-3%
4.8
-1%
5.5
-16%
4
16%
9.3
-95%
4.31 (3.57 - 4.76, n=3)
9%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=737)
-24%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 05min
Oukitel C15 Pro
3200 mAh
Oukitel C13 Pro
3000 mAh
Oukitel U25 Pro
3200 mAh
TP-Link Neffos C9A
3020 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Go
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3
605
429
-29%
491
-19%
370
-39%
809
34%
749
24%
761
26%
546
-10%

Points positifs

+ design
+ Bluetooth 5.0
+ double SIM
+ carte micro SD
+ autonomie
+ luminosité de l'écran

Points négatifs

- faible résolution
- performances
- appareils photo
- mauvais capteurs
- haut-parleurs
- logiciel buggué
En test : l'Oukitel C15 Pro smartphone. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Oukitel.
En test : l'Oukitel C15 Pro smartphone. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Oukitel.

L’Oukitel C15 Pro possède quelques bons arguments, mais souffre de trop de faiblesses pour pouvoir être recommandé. La faible résolution de son écran est maintenant inacceptable même pour un smartphone à moins de 100 €, tout comme son horrible haut-parleur et son lecteur d’empreintes digitales presque inutilisable. De même, Oukitel a équipé l’appareil de capteurs photo sans relief, et d’un SoC MediaTek daté. Même la combinaison de 16 Go de stockage et de 2 Go de RAM semble insuffisant en 2019.

L’Oukitel C15 Pro est extérieurement réussi, mais nous recommandons d’aller voir ailleurs pour ceux qui cherchent un smartphone à petit prix. Le C15 Pro possède tout simplement trop de défauts pour pouvoir être crédible.

Tous ces défauts nous font nous poser une question simple : comment Oukitel peut-il faire aussi bien avec l’U25 Pro, également à petit prix, et rater à ce point les C13 Pro et C15 Pro, ce dernier ayant tant de défauts qu’il vaut mieux l’éviter.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Oukitel C15 Pro - 06/18/2019 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Châssis
77%
Clavier
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositif de pointage
75%
Connectivité
37 / 60 → 62%
Poids
90%
Autonomie
93%
Écran
84%
Performances en jeu
16 / 63 → 25%
Performances dans les applications
22 / 70 → 31%
Chauffe
92%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
47 / 91 → 52%
Appareil photo
36%
Moyenne
64%
74%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du smartphone Oukitel C15 Pro : un téléphone bas de gamme avec écran lumineux
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-06-24 (Update: 2019-06-24)