Notebookcheck

Courte critique du smartphone TP-Link Neffos N1

Mike Wobker (traduit par JBP), 05/16/2018

Avec bouton physique. Ces deux dernières années, TP-Link a été un acteur du marché des smartphones abordables, et a pu attirer des clients soucieux du prix. Le fabricant chinois continue cette stratégie avec le nouveau Neffos N1, qui cherche à se démarquer avec son double capteur photo 12 + 12 MP à prix abordable. Nous verrons dans notre rapport de test si cette approche fonctionne, et ce que les utilisateurs peuvent espérer du smartphone TP-Link.

TP-Link Neffos N1 (Neffos Gamme)
Processeur
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757
Carte graphique
ARM Mali-T880 MP2
Mémoire
4096 Mo 
Écran
5.5 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPP, capacitif, IPS, brillant: oui
Disque dur
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 Go 
, 52 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: lecteur d'empreintes digitales, boussole, gyroscope, accéléromètre, capteur de proximité, USB C
Réseau
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, FDD-LTE Cat.4:bandes (1 / 3 / 5 / 7 / 8 / 20), WCDMA : bandes (1 / 5 / 8), GSM : bandes (2 / 3 / 5 / 8), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 7.5 x 154.4 x 76.1
Batterie
3260 mAh Lithium-Ion, Quick Charge
Système d'exploitation
Android 7.1 Nougat
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 12 MPix double capteur 12 MP + 12 MP
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Clavier: virtuel, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, écouteurs, Smart NFUI 7.0, 24 Monate Mois Garantie, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, multitouche 10 points, étanche à l'eau et à l'huile, DAS (tête) : 0,961 W/kg, DAS (corps) : 1,604 W/kg, fanless
Poids
165 g, Alimentation: 70 g
Prix
250 euros

 

sidebar_1-multi

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
Adreno 505, 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash
270 MBit/s ∼100% +167%
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.7 - 939, n=199)
202 MBit/s ∼75% +100%
Motorola Moto G6
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s ∼42% +12%
Sony Xperia XA1
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 32 GB eMMC Flash
108 MBit/s ∼40% +7%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 64 GB eMMC Flash
101 MBit/s ∼37% 0%
TP-Link Neffos N1
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 64 GB eMMC Flash
101 MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.8 - 703, n=199)
194 MBit/s ∼100% +90%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
Adreno 505, 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash
182 MBit/s ∼94% +78%
Motorola Moto G6
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s ∼58% +11%
Sony Xperia XA1
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 32 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s ∼58% +10%
TP-Link Neffos N1
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 64 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s ∼53%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 64 GB eMMC Flash
96.1 MBit/s ∼50% -6%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
TP-Link Neffos N1
TP-Link Neffos N1
TP-Link Neffos N1
TP-Link Neffos N1
TP-Link Neffos N1
TP-Link Neffos N1

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
553
cd/m²
563
cd/m²
549
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
580
cd/m²
556
cd/m²
552
cd/m²
572
cd/m²
548
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 580 cd/m² Moyenne: 559.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.78 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 94 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 580 cd/m²
Contraste: 1933:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
99.9% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.22
sidebar_3-multi
TP-Link Neffos N1
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Blackview BV8000 Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
Sony Xperia XA1
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Motorola Moto G6
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
ZTE Blade V9
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
Screen
-52%
-25%
-2%
-11%
-16%
Brightness middle
580
434
-25%
522
-10%
488
-16%
634
9%
459
-21%
Brightness
560
414
-26%
499
-11%
478
-15%
635
13%
437
-22%
Brightness Distribution
94
86
-9%
92
-2%
95
1%
96
2%
90
-4%
Black Level *
0.3
0.64
-113%
0.74
-147%
0.42
-40%
0.49
-63%
0.62
-107%
Contrast
1933
678
-65%
705
-64%
1162
-40%
1294
-33%
740
-62%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.6
9.8
-75%
4.2
25%
3.9
30%
5.9
-5%
4.5
20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.2
19.2
-71%
11.5
-3%
6.8
39%
11.6
-4%
7.3
35%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.4
9.9
-34%
6.4
14%
5.3
28%
7.8
-5%
4.9
34%
Gamma
2.22 108%
2.64 91%
2.18 110%
2.41 100%
2.16 111%
2.17 111%
CCT
8584 76%
9219 71%
7044 92%
7146 91%
8464 77%
7261 90%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 54 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 10355 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 588200) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
25.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 7.6 ms hausse
↘ 18 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (26.2 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
71.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 34 ms hausse
↘ 37.2 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (41.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
66472 Points ∼94%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
64833 Points ∼91% -2%
Sony Xperia XA1
59082 Points ∼83% -11%
Motorola Moto G6
59454 Points ∼84% -11%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
46651 Points ∼66% -30%
ZTE Blade V9
60077 Points ∼85% -10%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (59082 - 66472, n=3)
63462 Points ∼89% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (39089 - 230421, n=296)
70951 Points ∼100% +7%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
57974 Points ∼48%
Motorola Moto G6
71352 Points ∼60% +23%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
58282 Points ∼49% +1%
ZTE Blade V9
71712 Points ∼60% +24%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757
57974 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (59421 - 266981, n=68)
119584 Points ∼100% +106%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
4634 Points ∼100%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
3801 Points ∼82% -18%
Sony Xperia XA1
Points ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto G6
4552 Points ∼98% -2%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
3623 Points ∼78% -22%
ZTE Blade V9
4401 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (3801 - 4634, n=3)
2812 Points ∼61% -39%
Average of class Smartphone (2152 - 8282, n=157)
4546 Points ∼98% -2%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
5893 Points ∼100%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
4477 Points ∼76% -24%
Sony Xperia XA1
4759 Points ∼81% -19%
Motorola Moto G6
5321 Points ∼90% -10%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
4709 Points ∼80% -20%
ZTE Blade V9
4967 Points ∼84% -16%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (4477 - 5893, n=3)
5043 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 9630, n=322)
4662 Points ∼79% -21%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
749 Points ∼88%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
736 Points ∼87% -2%
Sony Xperia XA1
847 Points ∼100% +13%
Motorola Moto G6
688 Points ∼81% -8%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
10 Points ∼1% -99%
ZTE Blade V9
731 Points ∼86% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (736 - 847, n=3)
777 Points ∼92% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 1682, n=397)
677 Points ∼80% -10%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
1117 Points ∼73%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
1118 Points ∼74% 0%
Sony Xperia XA1
1016 Points ∼67% -9%
Motorola Moto G6
965 Points ∼63% -14%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
788 Points ∼52% -29%
ZTE Blade V9
956 Points ∼63% -14%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (1016 - 1118, n=3)
1084 Points ∼71% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=397)
1521 Points ∼100% +36%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
1467 Points ∼100%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
1236 Points ∼84% -16%
Sony Xperia XA1
1063 Points ∼72% -28%
Motorola Moto G6
770 Points ∼52% -48%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
778 Points ∼53% -47%
ZTE Blade V9
962 Points ∼66% -34%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (1063 - 1467, n=3)
1255 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4423, n=397)
1107 Points ∼75% -25%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
3063 Points ∼100%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
3052 Points ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia XA1
2969 Points ∼97% -3%
Motorola Moto G6
2560 Points ∼84% -16%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
1805 Points ∼59% -41%
ZTE Blade V9
2772 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (2969 - 3063, n=3)
3028 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=397)
2190 Points ∼71% -29%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
1393 Points ∼100%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
1327 Points ∼95% -5%
Sony Xperia XA1
1284 Points ∼92% -8%
Motorola Moto G6
1069 Points ∼77% -23%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
323 Points ∼23% -77%
ZTE Blade V9
1169 Points ∼84% -16%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (1284 - 1393, n=3)
1335 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=400)
1128 Points ∼81% -19%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
2576 Points ∼63%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
2929 Points ∼72% +14%
Sony Xperia XA1
2747 Points ∼67% +7%
Motorola Moto G6
2777 Points ∼68% +8%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
2190 Points ∼54% -15%
ZTE Blade V9
3157 Points ∼77% +23%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (2576 - 2929, n=3)
2751 Points ∼67% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (912 - 14362, n=98)
4086 Points ∼100% +59%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
3539 Points ∼85%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
4053 Points ∼97% +15%
Sony Xperia XA1
3621 Points ∼87% +2%
Motorola Moto G6
3868 Points ∼93% +9%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
2601 Points ∼62% -27%
ZTE Blade V9
3907 Points ∼94% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (3539 - 4053, n=3)
3738 Points ∼90% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 10558, n=140)
4169 Points ∼100% +18%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
839 Points ∼66%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
851 Points ∼67% +1%
Sony Xperia XA1
828 Points ∼65% -1%
Motorola Moto G6
743 Points ∼59% -11%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
681 Points ∼54% -19%
ZTE Blade V9
769 Points ∼61% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (828 - 851, n=3)
839 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4265, n=141)
1265 Points ∼100% +51%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
1246 Points ∼68%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
1757 Points ∼95% +41%
Sony Xperia XA1
1804 Points ∼98% +45%
Motorola Moto G6
1834 Points ∼100% +47%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
1134 Points ∼62% -9%
ZTE Blade V9
1841 Points ∼100% +48%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (1246 - 1804, n=3)
1602 Points ∼87% +29%
Average of class Smartphone (1258 - 3669, n=249)
1548 Points ∼84% +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
624 Points ∼57%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
628 Points ∼57% +1%
Sony Xperia XA1
574 Points ∼52% -8%
Motorola Moto G6
363 Points ∼33% -42%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
262 Points ∼24% -58%
ZTE Blade V9
365 Points ∼33% -42%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (574 - 628, n=3)
609 Points ∼55% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 5212, n=249)
1098 Points ∼100% +76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
702 Points ∼67%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
733 Points ∼70% +4%
Sony Xperia XA1
677 Points ∼65% -4%
Motorola Moto G6
442 Points ∼42% -37%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
316 Points ∼30% -55%
ZTE Blade V9
444 Points ∼43% -37%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (677 - 733, n=3)
704 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 4732, n=257)
1042 Points ∼100% +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
1469 Points ∼78%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
1764 Points ∼93% +20%
Sony Xperia XA1
1892 Points ∼100% +29%
Motorola Moto G6
1803 Points ∼95% +23%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
1103 Points ∼58% -25%
ZTE Blade V9
1813 Points ∼96% +23%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (1469 - 1892, n=3)
1708 Points ∼90% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (1280 - 3642, n=278)
1436 Points ∼76% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
832 Points ∼57%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
905 Points ∼62% +9%
Sony Xperia XA1
827 Points ∼57% -1%
Motorola Moto G6
690 Points ∼47% -17%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
527 Points ∼36% -37%
ZTE Blade V9
697 Points ∼48% -16%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (827 - 905, n=3)
855 Points ∼59% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8252, n=278)
1461 Points ∼100% +76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
921 Points ∼74%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
1015 Points ∼82% +10%
Sony Xperia XA1
945 Points ∼76% +3%
Motorola Moto G6
800 Points ∼64% -13%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
596 Points ∼48% -35%
ZTE Blade V9
807 Points ∼65% -12%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (921 - 1015, n=3)
960 Points ∼77% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (71 - 6378, n=286)
1243 Points ∼100% +35%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
13959 Points ∼84%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
16603 Points ∼100% +19%
Sony Xperia XA1
16394 Points ∼99% +17%
Motorola Moto G6
13997 Points ∼84% 0%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
8990 Points ∼54% -36%
ZTE Blade V9
13862 Points ∼83% -1%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (13959 - 16603, n=3)
15652 Points ∼94% +12%
Average of class Smartphone (7733 - 36494, n=432)
12060 Points ∼73% -14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
13879 Points ∼90%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
14001 Points ∼91% +1%
Sony Xperia XA1
13125 Points ∼85% -5%
Motorola Moto G6
12441 Points ∼80% -10%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
10262 Points ∼66% -26%
ZTE Blade V9
12482 Points ∼81% -10%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (13125 - 14001, n=3)
13668 Points ∼88% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (9713 - 113380, n=432)
15456 Points ∼100% +11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
13897 Points ∼96%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
14506 Points ∼100% +4%
Sony Xperia XA1
13734 Points ∼95% -1%
Motorola Moto G6
12756 Points ∼88% -8%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
9949 Points ∼69% -28%
ZTE Blade V9
12764 Points ∼88% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (13734 - 14506, n=3)
14046 Points ∼97% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (9583 - 64405, n=433)
13334 Points ∼92% -4%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
24 fps ∼89%
Sony Xperia XA1
22 fps ∼81% -8%
Motorola Moto G6
22 fps ∼81% -8%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
18 fps ∼66% -25%
ZTE Blade V9
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (22 - 24, n=2)
23 fps ∼85% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (5.1 - 177, n=458)
27.1 fps ∼100% +13%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
22 fps ∼67%
Sony Xperia XA1
33 fps ∼100% +50%
Motorola Moto G6
20 fps ∼61% -9%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
14 fps ∼42% -36%
ZTE Blade V9
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (22 - 33, n=2)
27.5 fps ∼83% +25%
Average of class Smartphone (9.7 - 120, n=461)
23.4 fps ∼71% +6%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
11 fps ∼76%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
10 fps ∼69% -9%
Sony Xperia XA1
9.6 fps ∼66% -13%
Motorola Moto G6
9.4 fps ∼65% -15%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
7.6 fps ∼52% -31%
ZTE Blade V9
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (9.6 - 11, n=3)
10.2 fps ∼70% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=383)
14.5 fps ∼100% +32%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
11 fps ∼58%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
11 fps ∼58% 0%
Sony Xperia XA1
19 fps ∼100% +73%
Motorola Moto G6
8.9 fps ∼47% -19%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
7.5 fps ∼39% -32%
ZTE Blade V9
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (11 - 19, n=3)
13.7 fps ∼72% +25%
Average of class Smartphone (4.4 - 115, n=385)
14.6 fps ∼77% +33%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
6.8 fps ∼52%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
6.8 fps ∼52% 0%
Sony Xperia XA1
3.4 fps ∼26% -50%
Motorola Moto G6
6.1 fps ∼47% -10%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
2.4 fps ∼18% -65%
ZTE Blade V9
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (3.4 - 6.8, n=3)
5.67 fps ∼44% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=249)
13 fps ∼100% +91%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
6.9 fps ∼46%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
6.8 fps ∼45% -1%
Sony Xperia XA1
15 fps ∼100% +117%
Motorola Moto G6
5.8 fps ∼39% -16%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
4.8 fps ∼32% -30%
ZTE Blade V9
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (6.8 - 15, n=3)
9.57 fps ∼64% +39%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 110, n=251)
12.9 fps ∼86% +87%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
4.1 fps ∼45%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
4.1 fps ∼45% 0%
Sony Xperia XA1
3.7 fps ∼41% -10%
Motorola Moto G6
3.4 fps ∼38% -17%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
2.7 fps ∼30% -34%
ZTE Blade V9
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (3.7 - 4.1, n=3)
3.97 fps ∼44% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 35, n=181)
9.06 fps ∼100% +121%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
TP-Link Neffos N1
4.1 fps ∼50%
Blackview BV8000 Pro
4.1 fps ∼50% 0%
Sony Xperia XA1
7.9 fps ∼97% +93%
Motorola Moto G6
3.3 fps ∼41% -20%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
2.7 fps ∼33% -34%
ZTE Blade V9
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (4.1 - 7.9, n=3)
5.37 fps ∼66% +31%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 50, n=184)
8.12 fps ∼100% +98%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia XA1
4.88 fps ∼40%
Motorola Moto G6
5.38 fps ∼44%
ZTE Blade V9
5.41 fps ∼45%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757
4.88 fps ∼40%
Average of class Smartphone (1.06 - 38.7, n=72)
12.1 fps ∼100%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia XA1
191 Points ∼33%
Motorola Moto G6
129 Points ∼22%
ZTE Blade V9
129 Points ∼22%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757
191 Points ∼33%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 1702, n=59)
587 Points ∼100%

Légende

 
TP-Link Neffos N1 Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview BV8000 Pro Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA1 Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris VS Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 224, n=314)
34.9 Points ∼100% +20%
TP-Link Neffos N1 (Chrome 62)
29.019 Points ∼83%
Sony Xperia XA1 (Chrome 58)
28.45 Points ∼82% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (24.3 - 29, n=3)
27.3 Points ∼78% -6%
Blackview BV8000 Pro (Crome Version 51)
24.288 Points ∼70% -16%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
22.556 Points ∼65% -22%
ZTE Blade V9 (Ume Browser 1.2.18)
22.014 Points ∼63% -24%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=451)
5029 Points ∼100% +5%
TP-Link Neffos N1 (Chrome 62)
4797 Points ∼95%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (3609 - 4797, n=3)
4121 Points ∼82% -14%
ZTE Blade V9 (Ume Browser 1.2.18)
3969 Points ∼79% -17%
Sony Xperia XA1 (Chrome 58)
3956 Points ∼79% -18%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
3943 Points ∼78% -18%
Blackview BV8000 Pro (Crome Version 51)
3609 Points ∼72% -25%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
3305 Points ∼66% -31%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Blackview BV8000 Pro (Crome Version 51)
23223.7 ms * ∼100% -139%
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (9506 - 23224, n=3)
14144 ms * ∼61% -46%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus (Chrome 65)
13541.3 ms * ∼58% -40%
ZTE Blade V9 (Ume Browser 1.2.18)
11862.7 ms * ∼51% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=470)
11858 ms * ∼51% -22%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
11751.4 ms * ∼51% -21%
TP-Link Neffos N1 (Chrome 62)
9701.2 ms * ∼42%
Sony Xperia XA1
9506.4 ms * ∼41% +2%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

TP-Link Neffos N1Blackview BV8000 ProSony Xperia XA1Motorola Moto G6BQ Aquaris VS PlusZTE Blade V9Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-13%
-15%
-0%
-14%
-25%
-23%
-43%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.41 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
68.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
68.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
1%
61.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
60.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-10%
62.09 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
49.3 (19.6 - 74.7, n=40)
-27%
41.9 (8.29 - 87.1, n=229)
-38%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.89 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.34 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
78.37 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
3%
75.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
84.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
83.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
67.9 (21.1 - 86.9, n=40)
-11%
60.3 (13.5 - 96.5, n=229)
-21%
Random Write 4KB
45.48
15.05
-67%
13.2
-71%
59.91
32%
6.4
-86%
12.47
-73%
15 (3.4 - 71.1, n=48)
-67%
12.9 (0.14 - 164, n=503)
-72%
Random Read 4KB
57.37
52.74
-8%
66.2
15%
69.91
22%
48.3
-16%
29.81
-48%
47.1 (11.4 - 149, n=48)
-18%
33.2 (1.59 - 173, n=503)
-42%
Sequential Write 256KB
184.56
177.09
-4%
127.8
-31%
117.19
-37%
205.1
11%
119.36
-35%
154 (40 - 215, n=48)
-17%
67.5 (2.99 - 215, n=503)
-63%
Sequential Read 256KB
262.1
246.42
-6%
248.5
-5%
238.23
-9%
274.3
5%
265.4
1%
266 (115 - 704, n=48)
1%
204 (12.1 - 832, n=503)
-22%
Dead Trigger 2
 ParamètresValeur
 high52 fps
 31.2 °C31.1 °C32.9 °C 
 31.8 °C31.1 °C34.7 °C 
 31.6 °C31.4 °C34.3 °C 
Maximum: 34.7 °C
Moyenne: 32.2 °C
29.9 °C29.9 °C30.7 °C
29.4 °C30.2 °C31 °C
29.7 °C30 °C31.2 °C
Maximum: 31.2 °C
Moyenne: 30.2 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  21.9 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.2382532.939.73137.226.14031.737.95039.637.96328.3328027.328.310026.927.512526.7371602437.720020.945.625020.952.331519.554.240018.560.650017.567.563017.564.580015.766.1100015.869.8125016.668.7160015.871.6200015.475.6250015.574.931501675.5400015.874.650001675.5630016.375800016.373.71000016.268.91250016.462.11600016.450.4SPL28.685.2N1.161.2median 16.4TP-Link Neffos N1median 67.5Delta2.111.728.623.524.921.724.621.926.422.630.831.423.622.920.218.619.920.617.622.319.135.619.136.617.443.916.951.216.854.315.156.816.557.915.663156615.565.315.368.215.76915.573.815.573.415.473.415.873.81672.115.872.416.171.616.168.117.354.527.982.9151.3median 16ZTE Blade V9median 65.30.613.631.634.925.430.725.326.932.931.833.628.631.631.828.431.8273120.830.42226.621.327.620.831.421.239.219.448.419.554.217.759.517.963.317.864.817.36517.465.116.764.417.267.718.26817.965.917.66917.766.517.860.617.96118.15318.237.13076.71.338median 17.9Sony Xperia XA1median 60.61.312.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
TP-Link Neffos N1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

ZTE Blade V9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Sony Xperia XA1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0 / 0.11 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.69 / 1.64 / 1.67 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 2.59 / 4.36 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
TP-Link Neffos N1
3260 mAh
Blackview BV8000 Pro
4180 mAh
Sony Xperia XA1
2300 mAh
Motorola Moto G6
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
3400 mAh
ZTE Blade V9
3200 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-30%
30%
-2%
-35%
-4%
-0%
-24%
Idle Minimum *
0.69
0.85
-23%
0.64
7%
0.6
13%
0.79
-14%
0.71
-3%
0.727 (0.64 - 0.85, n=3)
-5%
0.849 (0.2 - 3.4, n=531)
-23%
Idle Average *
1.64
1.56
5%
0.81
51%
1.81
-10%
2.29
-40%
1.73
-5%
1.337 (0.81 - 1.64, n=3)
18%
1.685 (0.6 - 6.2, n=530)
-3%
Idle Maximum *
1.67
1.67
-0%
0.86
49%
1.86
-11%
2.3
-38%
1.78
-7%
1.4 (0.86 - 1.67, n=3)
16%
1.916 (0.74 - 6.6, n=531)
-15%
Load Average *
2.59
4.37
-69%
2.09
19%
2.78
-7%
3.84
-48%
2.74
-6%
3.02 (2.09 - 4.37, n=3)
-17%
3.96 (0.8 - 10.8, n=525)
-53%
Load Maximum *
4.36
7.06
-62%
3.31
24%
4.04
7%
5.95
-36%
4.36
-0%
4.91 (3.31 - 7.06, n=3)
-13%
5.56 (1.2 - 14.2, n=525)
-28%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 56min
TP-Link Neffos N1
3260 mAh
Blackview BV8000 Pro
4180 mAh
Sony Xperia XA1
2300 mAh
Motorola Moto G6
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
3400 mAh
ZTE Blade V9
3200 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3
776
688
-11%
675
-13%
553
-29%
644
-17%
790
2%

Points positifs

+ châssis robuste
+ bon appareil photo double capteur
+ bouton physique pour la fonction silence
+ bonne autonomie

Points négatifs

- châssis chauffe trop
- partie logicielle ancienne
En test : le TP-Link Neffos N1. Modèle de test fourni par notebooksbilliger.de.
En test : le TP-Link Neffos N1. Modèle de test fourni par notebooksbilliger.de.

Dans notre test, le Neffos N1 se présente comme un solide smartphone du milieu de gamme. Les performances sont à la hauteur de ses composants. Par rapport aux appareils concurrents abordables, le TP-Link se démarque avec son double appareil photo 12 + 12 MP, qui prend de bonnes photos, et aussi en condition de faible luminosité. Il possède également un bouton physique pour activer le mode silence.

Le Neffos N1 possède cependant une partie logicielle datée. Les performances globales sont bonnes, sans être exceptionnelles. Exception faite de l’appareil photo, les smartphones concurrents ont des composants plus récents, et possèdent une meilleure autonomie.

Le Neffos N1 possède un appareil photo particulièrement bon. Le logiciel daté et la courte autonomie gâchent un peu l’ensemble.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

TP-Link Neffos N1 - 05/14/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Châssis
78%
Clavier
68 / 75 → 90%
Dispositif de pointage
87%
Connectivité
39 / 60 → 66%
Poids
91%
Autonomie
96%
Écran
84%
Performances en jeu
34 / 63 → 54%
Performances dans les applications
54 / 70 → 77%
Chauffe
94%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Appareil photo
70%
Moyenne
74%
83%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du smartphone TP-Link Neffos N1
Mike Wobker, 2018-05-16 (Update: 2018-05-16)