Notebookcheck

Test du Honor 9X : nouveau smartphone Huawei avec les services Google Play

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Andrea Grüblinger (traduit par Prévots), 11/14/2019

Déjà vu. Notebookcheck teste le Honor 9X, un appareil du milieu de gamme avec entre autres un appareil photo frontal rétractable, un écran de 6,59 pouces sans encoche ni trou, et un SoC HiSilicon Kirin 710F. Lisez ce rapport pour voir dans quels domaines le smartphone Honor marque des points, et s’il peut maintenir la réputation de la marque de vendre des appareils du milieu de gamme à un prix bien ajusté.

Honor 9X (9 Gamme)
Processeur
HiSilicon Kirin 710
Carte graphique
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Mémoire
4096 Mo 
Écran
6.59 pouces 19.5, 2340 x 1080 pixel 391 PPP, capacitif, LCD IPS
Disque dur
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 Go 
, , 112.6 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD jusqu'à 512 Go, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, boussole, gyroscope, capteur de proximité, OTG, Miracast, appels Wi-Fi
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM : 850, 900, 1 800, 1 900 MHz. UMTS: 850, 900, 1 900, 2 100 MHz. LTE : 800, 850, 900, 1 800, 2 100, 2 300, 2 500, 2 600 MHz., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.8 x 163.5 x 77.3
Batterie
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 48 MPix f/1,8
Appareil photo secondaire: 16 MPix f/2,2
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, écouteurs, chargeur, câble USB, outil pour carte SIM, guide de démarrage rapide, carte de garantie, EMUI 9.1 , 24 Mois Garantie, DAS : 0,84 W/kg (tête). LTE Cat.12 (600 Mbit/s / 100 Mbit/s), DRM Widevine : L1, fanless
Poids
197 g, Alimentation: 53 g
Prix
300 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Appareils du comparatif

NoteDateModèlePoidsDriveTailleRésolutionBest Price
76%11/19Honor 9X
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
197 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.59"2340x1080
84%06/19Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
197 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.59"2340x1080
81%11/19Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4
200 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.53"2340x1080
84%04/19Sony Xperia 10
630, Adreno 508
162 g64 GB eMMC Flash6"2520x1080
81%07/19Xiaomi Mi 9T
730, Adreno 618
191 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.39"2340x1080
80%05/19Samsung Galaxy A50
Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3
166 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2340x1080
Honor 9X
Honor 9X
Honor 9X
Honor 9X

Comparaison des tailles

163.5 mm 77.3 mm 8.8 mm 197 g163.5 mm 77.3 mm 8.8 mm 197 g161.35 mm 76.4 mm 8.79 mm 200 g158.5 mm 74.7 mm 7.7 mm 166 g156.7 mm 74.3 mm 8.8 mm 191 g156 mm 68 mm 8.4 mm 162 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
353 (min: 330, max: 362) MBit/s ∼100% +108%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 (min: 326, max: 341) MBit/s ∼95% +96%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Adreno 618, 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
333 (min: 297, max: 343) MBit/s ∼94% +96%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 278, max: 302) MBit/s ∼83% +73%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1014, n=476)
235 MBit/s ∼67% +38%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
191 (min: 143, max: 217) MBit/s ∼54% +12%
Honor 9X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
170 (min: 156, max: 179) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
319 (min: 302, max: 325) MBit/s ∼100% +125%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Adreno 618, 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
293 (min: 161, max: 346) MBit/s ∼92% +106%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
272 (min: 250, max: 285) MBit/s ∼85% +92%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
253 (min: 128, max: 283) MBit/s ∼79% +78%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 966, n=476)
222 MBit/s ∼70% +56%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
212 (min: 194, max: 237) MBit/s ∼66% +49%
Honor 9X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
142 (min: 118, max: 160) MBit/s ∼45%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø170 (156-179)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø142 (118-160)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : pont.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : pont.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : boucle.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : boucle.
GPS Honor 9X : vue générale.
GPS Honor 9X : vue générale.
GPS Honor 9X : pont.
GPS Honor 9X : pont.
GPS Honor 9X : boucle.
GPS Honor 9X : boucle.
Lenovo ThinkPad P53 - Options d'appareil photo supplémentaires.
Lenovo ThinkPad P53 - Options d'appareil photo supplémentaires.
Lenovo ThinkPad P53 - Appareil photo : interface.
Lenovo ThinkPad P53 - Appareil photo : interface.
Lenovo ThinkPad P53 - Réglages de l'appareil photo.
Lenovo ThinkPad P53 - Réglages de l'appareil photo.
Lenovo ThinkPad P53 - Mode Pro.
Lenovo ThinkPad P53 - Mode Pro.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker Photo
29.6 ∆E
54.9 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
64.9 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
46.6 ∆E
37.4 ∆E
76.6 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor 9X: 47.07 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 94.33 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
10.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor 9X: 5.52 ∆E min: 1.07 - max: 10.65 ∆E
Lenovo ThinkPad P53 - ColorChecker Passport : la couleur de référence se situe dans la partie inférieure de chaque bloc.
Lenovo ThinkPad P53 - ColorChecker Passport : la couleur de référence se situe dans la partie inférieure de chaque bloc.
Lenovo ThinkPad P53 - ColorChecker Passport à 1 lux.
Lenovo ThinkPad P53 - Mire de test.
Lenovo ThinkPad P53 - Mire de test à 1 lux.
469
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 499 cd/m² Moyenne: 482.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.09 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 94 %
Contraste: 969:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.74 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 7.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.086
Honor 9X
LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.59
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.59
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53
Sony Xperia 10
IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6
Xiaomi Mi 9T
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Screen
-2%
23%
19%
38%
31%
Brightness middle
494
439
-11%
669
35%
547
11%
589
19%
644
30%
Brightness
483
431
-11%
630
30%
525
9%
589
22%
628
30%
Brightness Distribution
94
92
-2%
87
-7%
93
-1%
96
2%
91
-3%
Black Level *
0.51
0.36
29%
0.42
18%
0.36
29%
Contrast
969
1219
26%
1593
64%
1519
57%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.74
6.4
-11%
4.8
16%
4.6
20%
2.5
56%
2.64
54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.26
12.1
-18%
9
12%
12.1
-18%
4.9
52%
9.23
10%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.3
8.6
-18%
6.2
15%
3.9
47%
1.6
78%
2.5
66%
Gamma
2.086 105%
2.18 101%
2.24 98%
2.17 101%
2.24 98%
2.024 109%
CCT
8572 76%
9021 72%
7846 83%
7158 91%
6544 99%
6649 98%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 13573 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
20 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 7 ms hausse
↘ 13 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
38 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 19 ms hausse
↘ 19 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (39.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1218 Points ∼90%
Average of class Smartphone
  (143 - 3222, n=39)
1359 Points ∼100%
OpenCL Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
984 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1793 Points ∼99% +82%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
984 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=45)
1816 Points ∼100% +85%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1412 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1612 Points ∼85% +14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
1412 Points ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=57)
1894 Points ∼100% +34%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
335 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
391 Points ∼72% +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
335 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=57)
541 Points ∼100% +61%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7018 Points ∼70%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6929 Points ∼70% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
9967 Points ∼100% +42%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5987 Points ∼60% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7533 Points ∼76% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5827 Points ∼58% -17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5803 - 7141, n=9)
6448 Points ∼65% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=412)
5405 Points ∼54% -23%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
9509 Points ∼64%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
9424 Points ∼63% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
14946 Points ∼100% +57%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4948 Points ∼33% -48%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9049 Points ∼61% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7029 Points ∼47% -26%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (7004 - 9509, n=10)
8217 Points ∼55% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=576)
5872 Points ∼39% -38%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2345 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2543 Points ∼91% +8%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2167 Points ∼78% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2786 Points ∼100% +19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2272 - 2345, n=3)
2318 Points ∼83% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=86)
2660 Points ∼95% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
801 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1978 Points ∼74% +147%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
693 Points ∼26% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1917 Points ∼72% +139%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (801 - 1220, n=3)
1047 Points ∼39% +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=86)
2673 Points ∼100% +234%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
938 Points ∼38%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2087 Points ∼85% +122%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
861 Points ∼35% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2060 Points ∼84% +120%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (938 - 1365, n=3)
1189 Points ∼48% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=86)
2453 Points ∼100% +162%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2579 Points ∼78%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2789 Points ∼84% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3326 Points ∼100% +29%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1664 Points ∼50% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3241 Points ∼97% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2266 Points ∼68% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1851 - 2789, n=11)
2359 Points ∼71% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=420)
2008 Points ∼60% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
844 Points ∼36%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
840 Points ∼36% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2322 Points ∼100% +175%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
792 Points ∼34% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2176 Points ∼94% +158%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1188 Points ∼51% +41%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (470 - 1194, n=11)
825 Points ∼36% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=420)
1810 Points ∼78% +114%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
992 Points ∼41%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
993 Points ∼41% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2412 Points ∼100% +143%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
896 Points ∼37% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2347 Points ∼97% +137%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1328 Points ∼55% +34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (563 - 1351, n=11)
960 Points ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=421)
1685 Points ∼70% +70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2598 Points ∼77%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2723 Points ∼81% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3362 Points ∼100% +29%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1732 Points ∼52% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3296 Points ∼98% +27%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2241 Points ∼67% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1656 - 2723, n=11)
2374 Points ∼71% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5133, n=448)
1915 Points ∼57% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1350 Points ∼41%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1378 Points ∼42% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2323 Points ∼70% +72%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1299 Points ∼39% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3316 Points ∼100% +146%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1553 Points ∼47% +15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (740 - 1378, n=11)
1229 Points ∼37% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=448)
2417 Points ∼73% +79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1525 Points ∼46%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1534 Points ∼46% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2412 Points ∼73% +58%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1375 Points ∼42% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3312 Points ∼100% +117%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1667 Points ∼50% +9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (844 - 1534, n=11)
1376 Points ∼42% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=448)
2036 Points ∼61% +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2549 Points ∼78%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2668 Points ∼81% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3280 Points ∼100% +29%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1645 Points ∼50% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3227 Points ∼98% +27%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2351 Points ∼72% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1924 - 2716, n=11)
2454 Points ∼75% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4909, n=500)
1914 Points ∼58% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
848 Points ∼38%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
856 Points ∼39% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2218 Points ∼100% +162%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
704 Points ∼32% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2008 Points ∼91% +137%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1149 Points ∼52% +35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (457 - 856, n=11)
743 Points ∼33% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=500)
1504 Points ∼68% +77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
995 Points ∼42%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
990 Points ∼41% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2390 Points ∼100% +140%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
809 Points ∼34% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2192 Points ∼92% +120%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1296 Points ∼54% +30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (550 - 995, n=11)
877 Points ∼37% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=501)
1450 Points ∼61% +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2536 Points ∼78%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2654 Points ∼81% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3267 Points ∼100% +29%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1687 Points ∼52% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3239 Points ∼99% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2432 Points ∼74% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1907 - 2654, n=11)
2446 Points ∼75% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4900, n=540)
1777 Points ∼54% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1333 Points ∼42%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1327 Points ∼42% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2219 Points ∼70% +66%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1235 Points ∼39% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3184 Points ∼100% +139%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1279 Points ∼40% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (568 - 1333, n=11)
1050 Points ∼33% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=539)
1978 Points ∼62% +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1490 Points ∼47%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1490 Points ∼47% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2390 Points ∼75% +60%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1315 Points ∼41% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3196 Points ∼100% +114%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1430 Points ∼45% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (673 - 1490, n=11)
1196 Points ∼37% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=542)
1711 Points ∼54% +15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
22492 Points ∼98%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
22668 Points ∼99% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
22928 Points ∼100% +2%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
12437 Points ∼54% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
19433 Points ∼85% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14353 Points ∼63% -36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11158 - 22668, n=9)
15870 Points ∼69% -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=700)
14390 Points ∼63% -36%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21792 Points ∼47%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
22605 Points ∼49% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
39137 Points ∼84% +80%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
17878 Points ∼38% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
46605 Points ∼100% +114%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16593 Points ∼36% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12426 - 22605, n=9)
20229 Points ∼43% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=698)
22592 Points ∼48% +4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21943 Points ∼62%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
22168 Points ∼62% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
33832 Points ∼95% +54%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
16290 Points ∼46% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
35557 Points ∼100% +62%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16037 Points ∼45% -27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12120 - 22168, n=9)
18823 Points ∼53% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=698)
18254 Points ∼51% -17%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
39 fps ∼48%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
39 fps ∼48% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
82 fps ∼100% +110%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
29 fps ∼35% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
77 fps ∼94% +97%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
39 fps ∼48% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (33 - 39, n=10)
37.9 fps ∼46% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=713)
38.7 fps ∼47% -1%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
35 fps ∼60%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
35 fps ∼60% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +66%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
25 fps ∼43% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +66%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps ∼62% +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (31 - 36, n=10)
34.9 fps ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=722)
28.5 fps ∼49% -19%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21 fps ∼43%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21 fps ∼43% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
49 fps ∼100% +133%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
13 fps ∼27% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼78% +81%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼47% +10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (17 - 21, n=10)
20.4 fps ∼42% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=618)
22.4 fps ∼46% +7%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼45%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼45% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +121%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
11 fps ∼26% -42%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼81% +79%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼50% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (16 - 19, n=10)
18.5 fps ∼44% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=627)
19.7 fps ∼47% +4%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
14 fps ∼48%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
14 fps ∼48% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
29 fps ∼100% +107%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
9.5 fps ∼33% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼93% +93%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼48% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12 - 14, n=10)
13.7 fps ∼47% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=483)
18.2 fps ∼63% +30%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼46%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼46% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
26 fps ∼100% +117%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
7.8 fps ∼30% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
24 fps ∼92% +100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼50% +8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11 - 13, n=10)
12.5 fps ∼48% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=485)
17.1 fps ∼66% +43%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.3 fps ∼23%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.2 fps ∼22% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
6.8 fps ∼68% +196%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2.7 fps ∼27% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9.3 fps ∼93% +304%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 fps ∼49% +113%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2.2 - 7, n=10)
4.03 fps ∼40% +75%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=210)
9.98 fps ∼100% +334%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4 fps ∼36%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3.5 fps ∼32% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
11 fps ∼100% +175%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1.7 fps ∼15% -57%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6.1 fps ∼55% +53%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps ∼28% -22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2.6 - 4, n=10)
2.88 fps ∼26% -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=209)
6.9 fps ∼63% +73%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.1 fps ∼36%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.7 fps ∼28% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
17 fps ∼100% +179%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.4 fps ∼26% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼88% +146%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps ∼48% +34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 6.9, n=10)
5.95 fps ∼35% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=214)
14.7 fps ∼86% +141%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼37%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5.7 fps ∼30% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19 fps ∼100% +171%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.9 fps ∼26% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼84% +129%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9 fps ∼47% +29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 7, n=10)
6.38 fps ∼34% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=214)
16.4 fps ∼86% +134%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.7 fps ∼48%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.7 fps ∼48% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +108%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5.3 fps ∼33% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +108%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼56% +16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (6.9 - 7.7, n=10)
7.58 fps ∼47% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=408)
12.4 fps ∼78% +61%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.5 fps ∼46%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.1 fps ∼51% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
14 fps ∼100% +115%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.3 fps ∼31% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13 fps ∼93% +100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼58% +25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (6.4 - 7.1, n=10)
6.72 fps ∼48% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=412)
11.1 fps ∼79% +71%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
183420 Points ∼87%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
140131 Points ∼66% -24%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
88287 Points ∼42% -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
210836 Points ∼100% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
144194 Points ∼68% -21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (124870 - 183420, n=10)
139210 Points ∼66% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=297)
143610 Points ∼68% -22%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1090 Points ∼91%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1194 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1145 Points ∼96% +5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
815 Points ∼68% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1099 Points ∼92% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
927 Points ∼78% -15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (982 - 1212, n=10)
1100 Points ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=649)
767 Points ∼64% -30%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1478 Points ∼42%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1489 Points ∼42% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3419 Points ∼96% +131%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1409 Points ∼40% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3559 Points ∼100% +141%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1957 Points ∼55% +32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1450 - 1489, n=10)
1468 Points ∼41% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=649)
2126 Points ∼60% +44%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2948 Points ∼63%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3013 Points ∼65% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3609 Points ∼78% +22%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
983 Points ∼21% -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
4646 Points ∼100% +58%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2492 Points ∼54% -15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2823 - 4360, n=10)
3235 Points ∼70% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=649)
1570 Points ∼34% -47%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5297 Points ∼78%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5267 Points ∼78% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
6155 Points ∼91% +16%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3159 Points ∼47% -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6760 Points ∼100% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5112 Points ∼76% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4826 - 5568, n=10)
5253 Points ∼78% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=649)
3060 Points ∼45% -42%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2240 Points ∼67%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2301 Points ∼69% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3054 Points ∼92% +36%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1374 Points ∼41% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3329 Points ∼100% +49%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2193 Points ∼66% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2140 - 2445, n=10)
2270 Points ∼68% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=649)
1534 Points ∼46% -32%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
47.131 Points ∼100% +43%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=118)
36.3 Points ∼77% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
35.298 Points ∼75% +7%
Honor 9X (Chrome 78)
32.916 Points ∼70%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019 (Chrome 74)
32.095 Points ∼68% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30 - 32.9, n=5)
31.4 Points ∼67% -5%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
16.254 Points ∼34% -51%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
46.46 runs/min ∼100% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
41.6 runs/min ∼90% +23%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=106)
40 runs/min ∼86% +18%
Honor 9X (Chrome 78)
33.9 runs/min ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)
33.07 runs/min ∼71% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (31.2 - 33.9, n=4)
32.4 runs/min ∼70% -4%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
17501 Points ∼100% +78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
15606 Points ∼89% +58%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
10322 Points ∼59% +5%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019 (Chrome 74)
10288 Points ∼59% +4%
Honor 9X (Chrome 78)
9851 Points ∼56%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (9041 - 10288, n=10)
9577 Points ∼55% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=707)
6952 Points ∼40% -29%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
4865 Points ∼28% -51%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=732)
10406 ms * ∼100% -152%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
10256.9 ms * ∼99% -149%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3999 - 4853, n=10)
4235 ms * ∼41% -3%
Honor 9X (Chrome 78)
4123.4 ms * ∼40%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019 (Chrome 74)
4103 ms * ∼39% -0%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
3897 ms * ∼37% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
3001.5 ms * ∼29% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
2563.9 ms * ∼25% +38%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Honor 9XHuawei P Smart Z 2019Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 ProSony Xperia 10Xiaomi Mi 9TSamsung Galaxy A50Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-25%
-6%
-33%
-24%
-29%
-11%
-50%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
57.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-15%
63.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-10%
59.3 (25.5 - 72.4, n=20)
-12%
49.8 (1.7 - 87.1, n=449)
-26%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
71.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
83.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
73.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
74.1 (28.2 - 88.2, n=20)
-3%
68 (8.1 - 96.5, n=449)
-11%
Random Write 4KB
159.3
77.98
-51%
180.4
13%
14.39
-91%
107.82
-32%
18.2
-89%
89.4 (18.2 - 250, n=43)
-44%
24 (0.14 - 259, n=776)
-85%
Random Read 4KB
142.32
94.07
-34%
156.22
10%
53.12
-63%
128.65
-10%
98.9
-31%
140 (98.9 - 161, n=43)
-2%
49.3 (1.59 - 226, n=776)
-65%
Sequential Write 256KB
196.1
191.75
-2%
193.54
-1%
232.87
19%
179.19
-9%
192.1
-2%
212 (182 - 503, n=43)
8%
101 (2.99 - 590, n=776)
-48%
Sequential Read 256KB
860.34
304.32
-65%
534.5
-38%
273.8
-68%
492.74
-43%
507.3
-41%
756 (427 - 912, n=43)
-12%
283 (12.1 - 1781, n=776)
-67%
 41.4 °C37.3 °C35.4 °C 
 41.4 °C37.4 °C35.9 °C 
 40.9 °C37.2 °C35.1 °C 
Maximum: 41.4 °C
Moyenne: 38 °C
33.7 °C36.3 °C40.5 °C
34.4 °C36 °C40.7 °C
34.6 °C36 °C39 °C
Maximum: 40.7 °C
Moyenne: 36.8 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  40.5 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.247.12537.540.13130.528.44033345037.642.46328.626.28023.923.310022.824.312521.921.716020.329.52002041.625019.144.63151750.540016.553.450016.859.263016.263.680015.565.8100014.869.3125014.169.6160015.568.2200015.567250014.566.7315013.863.3400013.765.9500013.864.563001465.380001460.21000014.149.81250014.243.71600014.337.2SPL60.964.462.127.178N13.816.914.70.939.9median 15.5median 60.2Delta1.911.832.836.425.53027.525.222.333.728.531.118.92920.22521.621.418.723.420.237.917.144.514.647.515.952.915.456.916.56214.265.214.571.513.372.113.472.113.671.314.27014.672.213.676.714.479.214.571.814.268.814.670.514.868.314.95115.244.126.585.10.859.3median 14.6median 68.30.811.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor 9XHuawei P Smart Z 2019
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor 9X audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei P Smart Z 2019 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.2 / 1.9 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 2.3 / 3 / 4.2 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 5.3 / 9.4 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 9X
4000 mAh
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
4500 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
32%
32%
45%
62%
35%
30%
43%
Idle Minimum *
2.3
0.85
63%
0.79
66%
0.72
69%
0.54
77%
0.8
65%
1.083 (0.8 - 2.3, n=10)
53%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=800)
62%
Idle Average *
3
2.4
20%
2.32
23%
2.16
28%
0.95
68%
1.5
50%
2.2 (1.2 - 3, n=10)
27%
1.741 (0.6 - 6.2, n=799)
42%
Idle Maximum *
4.2
2.43
42%
2.38
43%
2.17
48%
1.08
74%
1.7
60%
2.61 (2.2 - 4.2, n=10)
38%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=800)
52%
Load Average *
5.3
4.62
13%
4.72
11%
3.32
37%
2.7
49%
5.9
-11%
4.73 (4.06 - 6, n=10)
11%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=794)
23%
Load Maximum *
9.4
7.44
21%
7.68
18%
5.34
43%
5.4
43%
8.3
12%
7.58 (6.13 - 9.4, n=10)
19%
5.94 (1.2 - 14.2, n=794)
37%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 52min
Honor 9X
4000 mAh
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
4500 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3
832
746
-10%
864
4%
541
-35%
991
19%
701
-16%

Points positifs

+ design
+ GPS
+ stockage
+ autonomie
+ double SIM
+ extension micro SD
+ jack 3,5 mm

Points négatifs

- luminosité maximale
- contraste
- nombre de bandes LTE
- photos en basse luminosité
- arrière en plastique
- SoC au quotidien
- haut-parleur

Verdict

En test : le Honor 9X smartphone. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Honor Allemagne.
En test : le Honor 9X smartphone. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Honor Allemagne.

L’appareil qui arrive en Europe ressemble à un Huawei P Smart Z, avant tout parce que c’en est un. Honor a équipé sa version d’un stockage interne légèrement plus rapide, et d’un meilleur capteur photo principal, mais les deux appareils sont autrement identiques, si ce n’est que le Honor 9X possède un haut-parleur inférieur.

Alors que le Honor 9X et le P Smart Z ont tous les deux été lancés à environ 300 €, ce dernier peut être trouvé à presque 100 € de moins. Si les deux appareils avaient été lancés simultanément, le choix aurait été plus difficile. Mais un capteur photo principal légèrement meilleur et un stockage plus rapide ne justifient pas une hausse de prix de près d’un tiers.

Le Honor 9X est un smartphone du milieu de gamme correct, qui arrive trop tard. Choisissez plutôt le P Smart Z ou le Mi 9T.

En bref, nous ne pourrons recommander le Honor 9X sur le P Smart Z que quand ils seront au même prix. De plus, si vous êtes prêt à dépenser 300 € dans le Honor 9X, alors nous conseillons de jeter un œil au Xiaomi Mi 9T, qui possède un meilleur rapport qualité prix, et qui est plus polyvalent que le Honor 9X.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Honor 9X - 11/08/2019 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Châssis
76%
Clavier
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositif de pointage
89%
Connectivité
45 / 70 → 64%
Poids
88%
Autonomie
90%
Écran
76%
Performances en jeu
12 / 64 → 19%
Performances dans les applications
64 / 86 → 74%
Chauffe
89%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
60 / 90 → 67%
Appareil photo
61%
Moyenne
70%
76%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Honor 9X : nouveau smartphone Huawei avec les services Google Play
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-11-14 (Update: 2019-11-14)