Notebookcheck

Test du Samsung Galaxy A41 : smartphone abordable malgré son écran Super AMOLED

Honneur. Avec sa série Galaxy A, Samsung propose des smartphones abordables mais bien équipés. De ce fait, les attentes autour du dernier-né de la série, le Galaxy A41 du milieu de gamme, sont élevées. Avec son écran de 6,1 pouces Super AMOLED, un SoC octocœur et un triple capteur photo 48 MP, le smartphone possède quelques bons prérequis...
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger (traduit par Prévots),
Samsung Galaxy A41
Processeur
Mediatek Helio P65 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Carte graphique
ARM Mali-G52 MP2
Mémoire
4096 Mo 
, LPDDR4X
Écran
6.1 pouces 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 431 PPP, capacitif, Super AMOLED, Infinity-U, Full HD+, brillant: oui, 60 Hz
Disque dur
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 Go 
, 45.1 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD jusqu'à 512 Go (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, gyroscope, capteur de proximité, boussole, WiFi Direct, USB OTG, DRM Widevine L1, Dolby Atmos
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, ​900, ​1 800, ​1 900 MHz), 3G (bandes 1, 2, 5, 8), LTE (bandes 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41), DAS (tête) : 0.587 W/Kg, DAS (corps) : 1 500 W/Kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 7.9 x 149.9 x 69.8
Batterie
3500 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Android 10
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 48 MPix 48 MP grand-angle (f/2,0, 26 mm, 1/2,0", 0,8 µm) + 8 MP ultra grand-angle (f/2,2, 12 mm, 1/4,0", 1,12 µm) + 5 MP pour effets Bokeh (f/2,4)
Appareil photo secondaire: 25 MPix f/2,2, 25 mm, 1/2,8", 0,9 µm
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono sur la tranche inférieure, Clavier: virtuel, chargeur modulaire 15 Watt, câble USB (USB A vers USB C), écouteurs, outil pour carte SIM, guide de démarrage rapide, carnet de garantie, OneUI 2.1, 24 Mois Garantie, fanless
Poids
152 g, Alimentation: 30 g
Prix
299 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Appareils du comparatif

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Drive
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
79 %
08/20
Samsung Galaxy A41
Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2
152 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.1"2400x1080
80 %
08/19
Google Pixel 3a
SD 670, Adreno 616
147 g64 GB eMMC Flash5.6"2220x1080
79 %
02/20
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
159 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.15"2312x1080
80 %
07/20
Oppo Reno3
Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446
170 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2400x1080
79 %
05/19
Samsung Galaxy A40
Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2
140 g64 GB eMMC Flash5.9"2340x1080
80 %
01/20
Samsung Galaxy A51
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.5"2400x1080
85 %
06/20
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
148 g128 GB NVMe4.7"1334x750

Comparaison des tailles

160.2 mm 73.3 mm 7.9 mm 170 g158.5 mm 73.6 mm 7.9 mm 172 g152.9 mm 72.7 mm 7.4 mm 159 g151.3 mm 70.1 mm 8.2 mm 147 g149.9 mm 69.8 mm 7.9 mm 152 g144.4 mm 69.2 mm 7.9 mm 140 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 148 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3a
Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
637 (275min - 679max) MBit/s ∼100% +75%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
618 (321min - 653max) MBit/s ∼97% +69%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
365 (349min - 370max) MBit/s ∼57%
Oppo Reno3
PowerVR GM9446, Helio P90, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
353 (297min - 367max) MBit/s ∼55% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
298 (185min - 350max) MBit/s ∼47% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=584)
274 MBit/s ∼43% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash
222 (203min - 243max) MBit/s ∼35% -39%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
189 (80min - 224max) MBit/s ∼30% -48%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
818 (400min - 892max) MBit/s ∼100% +134%
Google Pixel 3a
Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
541 (422min - 570max) MBit/s ∼66% +55%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
349 (339min - 355max) MBit/s ∼43%
Oppo Reno3
PowerVR GM9446, Helio P90, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
347 (331min - 352max) MBit/s ∼42% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
297 (189min - 335max) MBit/s ∼36% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash
268 (244min - 288max) MBit/s ∼33% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=584)
261 MBit/s ∼32% -25%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
224 (197min - 260max) MBit/s ∼27% -36%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø361 (349-370)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø349 (339-355)
GPS Samsung Galaxy A41 : vue générale.
GPS Samsung Galaxy A41 : vue générale.
GPS Samsung Galaxy A41 : lac.
GPS Samsung Galaxy A41 : lac.
GPS Samsung Galaxy A41 : virages.
GPS Samsung Galaxy A41 : virages.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : lac.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : lac.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : virages.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : virages.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Tageslicht-Szene 1Tageslicht-Szene 25-facher ZoomUltraweitwinkelLowlight-Umgebung
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
51.1 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
58.6 ∆E
50.6 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
39 ∆E
27.9 ∆E
61.3 ∆E
60.6 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
46 ∆E
34.6 ∆E
70.9 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
71.7 ∆E
66.9 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A41: 43.89 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 71.73 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
5 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
0.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A41: 7.96 ∆E min: 0.72 - max: 18.42 ∆E
536
cd/m²
555
cd/m²
575
cd/m²
543
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
583
cd/m²
539
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
583
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 583 cd/m² Moyenne: 558.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.61 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 92 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 554 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.11
Samsung Galaxy A41
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1
Google Pixel 3a
P-OLED, 2220x1080, 5.6
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
IPS, 2312x1080, 6.15
Oppo Reno3
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4
Samsung Galaxy A40
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.9
Samsung Galaxy A51
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5
Apple iPhone SE 2020
IPS, 1334x750, 4.7
Screen
-45%
-68%
-52%
-92%
-11%
26%
Brightness middle
554
403
-27%
507
-8%
595
7%
358
-35%
589
6%
688
24%
Brightness
559
411
-26%
481
-14%
598
7%
370
-34%
589
5%
659
18%
Brightness Distribution
92
96
4%
88
-4%
90
-2%
94
2%
94
2%
92
0%
Black Level *
0.38
0.28
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2
5.1
-155%
4.72
-136%
4.96
-148%
7.4
-270%
2.22
-11%
1
50%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.7
11
-43%
7.84
-2%
8.54
-11%
12.5
-62%
8.24
-7%
2.2
71%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
2
-25%
5.5
-244%
4.2
-163%
4
-150%
2.6
-63%
1.7
-6%
Gamma
2.11 104%
2.22 99%
2.158 102%
2.307 95%
2.084 106%
2.111 104%
2.25 98%
CCT
6589 99%
6589 99%
7596 86%
7072 92%
7078 92%
6508 100%
6790 96%
Contrast
1334
2457

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 245.1 Hz ≤ 99 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 245.1 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 99 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 245.1 Hz est relativement faible, les personnes les plus sensibles devraient percevoir un scintillement et être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire accrue (avec le niveau de luminosité indiqué)

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 17714 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
3.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 2 ms hausse
↘ 1.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
5.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 2.8 ms hausse
↘ 2.8 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Metal Score 5.1 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
6333 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4558 - 6333, n=3)
5739 Points ∼91%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
915 Points ∼56%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
635 Points ∼39% -31%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
915 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=66)
1633 Points ∼100% +78%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
960 Points ∼55%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
960 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=61)
1759 Points ∼100% +83%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1222 Points ∼37%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1331 Points ∼41% +9%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1524 Points ∼46% +25%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
3281 Points ∼100% +168%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
1222 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=106)
1963 Points ∼60% +61%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
357 Points ∼27%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
349 Points ∼26% -2%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
407 Points ∼30% +14%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
1336 Points ∼100% +274%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
357 Points ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=106)
557 Points ∼42% +56%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
6475 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3722 Points ∼57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=353)
4871 Points ∼75%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5164 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4105 Points ∼79%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13589, n=416)
4994 Points ∼97%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1624 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1329 Points ∼82%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4965, n=416)
1525 Points ∼94%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6742 Points ∼91%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7387 Points ∼100% +10%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6042 Points ∼82% -10%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
7129 Points ∼97% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5293 Points ∼72% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5649 Points ∼76% -16%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
6742 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=509)
5915 Points ∼80% -12%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7594 Points ∼80%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
9458 Points ∼100% +25%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
7593 Points ∼80% 0%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
8736 Points ∼92% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
6923 Points ∼73% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6416 Points ∼68% -16%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
7594 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=667)
6485 Points ∼69% -15%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2281 Points ∼82%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2196 Points ∼79% -4%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2770 Points ∼100% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2061 Points ∼74% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2161 Points ∼78% -5%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
2281 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=163)
2656 Points ∼96% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1005 Points ∼34%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
796 Points ∼27% -21%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1377 Points ∼46% +37%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
604 Points ∼20% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1438 Points ∼48% +43%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
1005 Points ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=163)
2978 Points ∼100% +196%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1148 Points ∼43%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
927 Points ∼35% -19%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1550 Points ∼58% +35%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
717 Points ∼27% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1554 Points ∼58% +35%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
1148 Points ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6754, n=163)
2673 Points ∼100% +133%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2427 Points ∼84%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼95% +14%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2092 Points ∼72% -14%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2784 Points ∼96% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1691 Points ∼58% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2311 Points ∼80% -5%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2898 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
2427 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=512)
2200 Points ∼76% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1028 Points ∼13%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1611 Points ∼21% +57%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
838 Points ∼11% -18%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1116 Points ∼14% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
549 Points ∼7% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1530 Points ∼19% +49%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
7847 Points ∼100% +663%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
1028 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=512)
2112 Points ∼27% +105%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1179 Points ∼21%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1772 Points ∼31% +50%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
967 Points ∼17% -18%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1287 Points ∼23% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
646 Points ∼11% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1654 Points ∼29% +40%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
5688 Points ∼100% +382%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
1179 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8269, n=513)
1971 Points ∼35% +67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2466 Points ∼61%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2771 Points ∼68% +12%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2084 Points ∼51% -15%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2776 Points ∼69% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1710 Points ∼42% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2336 Points ∼58% -5%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4052 Points ∼100% +64%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
2466 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=543)
2112 Points ∼52% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1486 Points ∼7%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2533 Points ∼13% +70%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1261 Points ∼6% -15%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2410 Points ∼12% +62%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
823 Points ∼4% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1993 Points ∼10% +34%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
20135 Points ∼100% +1255%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
1486 Points ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=543)
2830 Points ∼14% +90%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1630 Points ∼15%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2582 Points ∼24% +58%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1382 Points ∼13% -15%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2483 Points ∼23% +52%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
930 Points ∼9% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2060 Points ∼19% +26%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
10699 Points ∼100% +556%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
1630 Points ∼15% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=543)
2376 Points ∼22% +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2296 Points ∼79%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2728 Points ∼94% +19%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2207 Points ∼76% -4%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2687 Points ∼93% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1675 Points ∼58% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2217 Points ∼77% -3%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2892 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
2296 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=593)
2083 Points ∼72% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1016 Points ∼22%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1482 Points ∼32% +46%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
730 Points ∼16% -28%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1083 Points ∼24% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
539 Points ∼12% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1473 Points ∼32% +45%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4573 Points ∼100% +350%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
1016 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=593)
1779 Points ∼39% +75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1160 Points ∼29%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1651 Points ∼41% +42%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
858 Points ∼21% -26%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
1249 Points ∼31% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
635 Points ∼16% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1592 Points ∼39% +37%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4050 Points ∼100% +249%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
1160 Points ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7400, n=594)
1695 Points ∼42% +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2181 Points ∼76%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2708 Points ∼95% +24%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2179 Points ∼76% 0%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2685 Points ∼94% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1687 Points ∼59% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2225 Points ∼78% +2%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2857 Points ∼100% +31%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
2181 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=635)
1948 Points ∼68% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1093 Points ∼12%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2419 Points ∼26% +121%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
870 Points ∼9% -20%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2308 Points ∼25% +111%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
702 Points ∼8% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2027 Points ∼22% +85%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
9218 Points ∼100% +743%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
1093 Points ∼12% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12611, n=634)
2340 Points ∼25% +114%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1229 Points ∼20%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2477 Points ∼40% +102%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1004 Points ∼16% -18%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
2382 Points ∼39% +94%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
807 Points ∼13% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2068 Points ∼34% +68%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
6168 Points ∼100% +402%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
1229 Points ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9549, n=637)
2011 Points ∼33% +64%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
17231 Points ∼51%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
18523 Points ∼55% +7%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
21123 Points ∼62% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
12321 Points ∼36% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
20393 Points ∼60% +18%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
33851 Points ∼100% +96%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
17231 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=781)
15413 Points ∼46% -11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
22232 Points ∼11%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
35401 Points ∼17% +59%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
30124 Points ∼14% +35%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13821 Points ∼7% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
25086 Points ∼12% +13%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
209431 Points ∼100% +842%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
22232 Points ∼11% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=779)
26525 Points ∼13% +19%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
20885 Points ∼21%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
29229 Points ∼30% +40%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
27518 Points ∼28% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13457 Points ∼14% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23866 Points ∼25% +14%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
97290 Points ∼100% +366%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
20885 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=779)
20738 Points ∼21% -1%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
39 fps ∼16%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
58 fps ∼23% +49%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
33 fps ∼13% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
25 fps ∼10% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
46 fps ∼18% +18%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
250 fps ∼100% +541%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
39 fps ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=784)
44.9 fps ∼18% +15%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
37 fps ∼62%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
52 fps ∼87% +41%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
31 fps ∼52% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
23 fps ∼38% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
40 fps ∼67% +8%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +62%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
37 fps ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=793)
31 fps ∼52% -16%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
21 fps ∼14%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
29 fps ∼19% +38%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
18 fps ∼12% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼9% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
24 fps ∼16% +14%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
149 fps ∼100% +610%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
21 fps ∼14% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=689)
26.5 fps ∼18% +26%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
20 fps ∼33%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
27 fps ∼45% +35%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
16 fps ∼27% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
12 fps ∼20% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼38% +15%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +200%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
20 fps ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=697)
22.3 fps ∼37% +12%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼14%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
20 fps ∼22% +54%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
12 fps ∼13% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
8.1 fps ∼9% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
15 fps ∼16% +15%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
93 fps ∼100% +615%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
13 fps ∼14% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=552)
21.3 fps ∼23% +64%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼22%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
19 fps ∼32% +46%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
11 fps ∼18% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
7.4 fps ∼12% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼23% +8%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +362%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
13 fps ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=554)
19.4 fps ∼32% +49%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4.9 fps ∼8%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7 fps ∼12% +43%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
4.2 fps ∼7% -14%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
5.8 fps ∼10% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2.9 fps ∼5% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.5 fps ∼9% +12%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +1124%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
4.9 fps ∼8% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=305)
11.3 fps ∼19% +131%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2.8 fps ∼9%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
4.4 fps ∼14% +57%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2.6 fps ∼8% -7%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
3.8 fps ∼12% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1.8 fps ∼6% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼11% +25%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
31 fps ∼100% +1007%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
2.8 fps ∼9% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=303)
8.09 fps ∼26% +189%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps ∼13%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼18% +47%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.4 fps ∼11% -15%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
9.3 fps ∼16% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4.2 fps ∼7% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.1 fps ∼15% +21%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +700%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
7.5 fps ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=309)
16.9 fps ∼28% +125%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps ∼10%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼17% +60%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.9 fps ∼10% -8%
Oppo Reno3
Mediatek Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446, 8192
11 fps ∼15% +47%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4.7 fps ∼7% -37%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼14% +33%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
72 fps ∼100% +860%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
7.5 fps ∼10% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=308)
19.4 fps ∼27% +159%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8.1 fps ∼14%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼19% +36%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.4 fps ∼11% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5.2 fps ∼9% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼17% +23%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
59 fps ∼100% +628%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
8.1 fps ∼14% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=477)
14.3 fps ∼24% +77%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.7 fps ∼13%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
10 fps ∼17% +30%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
7.3 fps ∼12% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4.6 fps ∼8% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.6 fps ∼14% +12%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +679%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
7.7 fps ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=481)
12.7 fps ∼21% +65%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
157473 Points ∼32%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
185725 Points ∼38% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
181295 Points ∼37% +15%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
489463 Points ∼100% +211%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
157473 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=106)
319602 Points ∼65% +103%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
6.21 fps ∼32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.73 - 85.6, n=73)
19.2 fps ∼100%
Vulkan Medium Native (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.13 fps ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
6.43 fps ∼40% -30%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
9.13 fps ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=64)
16 fps ∼100% +75%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
10.57 fps ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5.35 fps ∼27% -49%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
10.6 fps ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=62)
19.9 fps ∼100% +88%
VRMark - Amber Room (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1164 Score ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
927 Score ∼36% -20%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
1164 Score ∼46% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=87)
2558 Score ∼100% +120%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1062 Points ∼86%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1229 Points ∼100% +16%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
998 Points ∼81% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
974 Points ∼79% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
1062 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=723)
817 Points ∼66% -23%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1113 Points ∼39%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2818 Points ∼100% +153%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1466 Points ∼52% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1114 Points ∼40% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2168 Points ∼77% +95%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
1113 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=723)
2489 Points ∼88% +124%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2148 Points ∼65%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
3288 Points ∼100% +53%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2993 Points ∼91% +39%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1935 Points ∼59% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1605 Points ∼49% -25%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
2148 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=723)
1847 Points ∼56% -14%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5142 Points ∼94%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5480 Points ∼100% +7%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
4909 Points ∼90% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3788 Points ∼69% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4738 Points ∼86% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
5142 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=723)
3438 Points ∼63% -33%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1901 Points ∼68%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2811 Points ∼100% +48%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2153 Points ∼77% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1679 Points ∼60% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
634 Points ∼23% -67%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
1901 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=723)
1752 Points ∼62% -8%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
139.668 Points ∼100% +328%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=183)
40.6 Points ∼29% +24%
Google Pixel 3a
33.563 Points ∼24% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
32.643 Points ∼23%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
32.6 Points ∼23% 0%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
31.333 Points ∼22% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
27.681 Points ∼20% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)
22.65 Points ∼16% -31%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
278.62 Points ∼100% +398%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
56 Points ∼20% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
55.972 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
51.257 Points ∼18% -8%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
50.919 Points ∼18% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=614)
47 Points ∼17% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)
42.7 Points ∼15% -24%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
158 runs/min ∼100% +468%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=166)
43 runs/min ∼27% +55%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
31.4 runs/min ∼20% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
29.1 runs/min ∼18% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
27.8 runs/min ∼18%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
27.8 runs/min ∼18% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)
24.1 runs/min ∼15% -13%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
146 Points ∼100% +181%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=250)
69.9 Points ∼48% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
57 Points ∼39% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)
52 Points ∼36% 0%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
52 Points ∼36% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
52 Points ∼36%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
52 Points ∼36% 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
48991 Points ∼100% +367%
Google Pixel 3a
10844 Points ∼22% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
10499 Points ∼21%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
10499 Points ∼21% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
10194 Points ∼21% -3%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
9549 Points ∼19% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=781)
7826 Points ∼16% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)
7798 Points ∼16% -26%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=807)
9792 ms * ∼100% -159%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)
4975.8 ms * ∼51% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
4375.1 ms * ∼45% -16%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
4317.8 ms * ∼44% -14%
Average Mediatek Helio P65
3779 ms * ∼39% -0%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
3778.9 ms * ∼39%
Google Pixel 3a
3589.4 ms * ∼37% +5%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
549.9 ms * ∼6% +85%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Samsung Galaxy A41Google Pixel 3aHuawei P30 Lite New EditionOppo Reno3Samsung Galaxy A40Samsung Galaxy A51Apple iPhone SE 2020Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
9%
86%
9%
-25%
18%
-24%
-25%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
8.4 (Kingston 32GB)
-87%
65.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
60.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-10%
57.8 (11.2 - 74.7, n=125)
-14%
51 (1.7 - 87.1, n=527)
-24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
13.4 (Kingston 32GB)
-84%
81.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
76.8 (21.1 - 87.2, n=125)
-7%
69 (8.1 - 96.5, n=527)
-17%
Random Write 4KB
72.53
99.86
38%
171.6
137%
143.9
98%
13.2
-82%
104.4
44%
27.7 (3.4 - 147, n=142)
-62%
35.3 (0.14 - 319, n=878)
-51%
Random Read 4KB
84
63.6
-24%
198.7
137%
127.3
52%
75.7
-10%
110.8
32%
56.1 (11.4 - 149, n=142)
-33%
58.7 (1.59 - 324, n=878)
-30%
Sequential Write 256KB
211.05
253.87
20%
391.1
85%
227.3
8%
99.6
-53%
184.9
-12%
174 (40 - 254, n=142)
-18%
126 (2.99 - 911, n=878)
-40%
Sequential Read 256KB
299.89
301.99
1%
800.3
167%
504.2
68%
295
-2%
496.1
65%
273 (95.6 - 704, n=142)
-9%
338 (12.1 - 1802, n=878)
13%
0102030405060Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 0.18.0: Ø27.2 (17-32)
; Arena of Valor; 1.34.1.10: Ø30 (2-31)
; Dead Trigger 2; 1.6.7: Ø59 (37-60)
 35.7 °C36 °C33.1 °C 
 36.6 °C36.6 °C32.7 °C 
 35.7 °C35.8 °C32.5 °C 
Maximum: 36.6 °C
Moyenne: 35 °C
32.7 °C32.6 °C36.1 °C
31.9 °C32.7 °C37.7 °C
31.9 °C32.9 °C37.4 °C
Maximum: 37.7 °C
Moyenne: 34 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  29.8 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.829.42519.626.33123.9254024.324.75030.533.46318.726.88020.422.510018.621.412517.517.416019.532.920019.239.425016.448.331515.254.340014.25750014.760.463013.862.580014.667100014.168.6125013.568.4160014.473.1200013.976.5250013.878.4315013.873.7400014.772.4500014.275.4630014.473.7800014.974.6100001563.41250015.152.31600015.350.1SPL26.585.5N0.859.7median 14.7median 63.4Delta0.813.44342.539.141.432.933.738.836.342.237.832.43126.725.525.92529.226.824.936.320.141.819.144.918.950.918.557.219.560.417.165.416.167.716.272.215.673.216.472.91771.416.370.115.36515.463.215.268.715.272.315.475.915.565.315.448.215.545.967.173.666.728.782.620.828.218.51.253.1median 16.3median 652.412.132.827.426.227.423.322.921.9252825.819.924.419.125.519.928.616.53919.64917.549.317.54813.951.513.952.815.858.815.260.71466.31468.613.97213.473.913.874.614.375.91477.114.576.914.677.914.57614.772.615.166.51558.314.847.126.586.40.862.5median 14.6median 66.3112.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A41Samsung Galaxy A40Apple iPhone SE 2020
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A41 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A40 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone SE 2020 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.02 / 0.3 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.96 / 1.57 / 1.61 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 2.93 / 4.97 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A41
3500 mAh
Google Pixel 3a
3000 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
3340 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A40
3100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone SE 2020
1822 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P65
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
12%
-36%
-48%
-25%
18%
0%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
0.96
0.61
36%
0.95
1%
0.8
17%
0.9
6%
0.44
54%
0.96
-0%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=883)
7%
Idle Average *
1.57
1.56
1%
2.1
-34%
1.4
11%
1.7
-8%
1.56
1%
1.57
-0%
1.755 (0.6 - 6.2, n=882)
-12%
Idle Maximum *
1.61
1.6
1%
2.4
-49%
2.3
-43%
1.8
-12%
1.63
-1%
1.61
-0%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=883)
-27%
Load Average *
2.93
2.67
9%
4.2
-43%
7.4
-153%
5.2
-77%
2.32
21%
2.93
-0%
4.1 (0.8 - 10.8, n=877)
-40%
Load Maximum *
4.97
4.33
13%
7.7
-55%
8.6
-73%
6.6
-33%
4.12
17%
4.97
-0%
6.07 (1.2 - 14.2, n=877)
-22%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
30h 43min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 50min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
16h 38min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
4h 28min
Samsung Galaxy A41
3500 mAh
Google Pixel 3a
3000 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
3340 mAh
Oppo Reno3
4025 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A40
3100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
-6%
-13%
23%
-6%
-2%
Reader / Idle
1843
1359
-26%
1689
-8%
1689
-8%
H.264
998
802
-20%
825
-17%
846
-15%
WiFi v1.3
650
612
-6%
719
11%
802
23%
643
-1%
698
7%
Load
268
223
-17%
277
3%
289
8%

Points positifs

+ poids et qualité du châssis
+ NFC, Bluetooth 5.0
+ emplacements micro SD et 2 nano SIM
+ luminosité et couleurs de l'écran Super AMOLED
+ autonomie

Points négatifs

- stockage disponible
- absence de stabilisateur photo
- scintillement MLI
- throttling en cas de sollicitations

Verdict

En test : le Samsung Galaxy A41. Modèle de test fourni par cyberport.
En test : le Samsung Galaxy A41. Modèle de test fourni par cyberport.

Une fois de plus, Samsung est à la hauteur de la réputation de sa série Galaxy A. Avec le Galaxy A41, le dernier-né de la série, il marque des points avec un bon rapport performances / prix. L'appareil du milieu de gamme n'a pas de vrai défaut, et s'avère plutôt bon dans l'ensemble, avec son écran Super AMOLED de 6,1 pouces, son châssis élégant et de qualité, le NFC, et une bonne autonomie.

Les petits compromis qu'il faudra accepter au quotidien avec un smartphone du milieu de gamme ne pèsent pas lourds en ce qui concerne le Galaxy A41, s'agissant plus de petits désagréments que de réels défauts. Par exemple le stockage aurait pu être un peu plus gros, les couleurs de l'appareil photo un peu plus fidèles, et l'autonomie un peu plus longue.

Une mise à jour réussie : le Galaxy A41 fait mieux que son prédécesseur, le Galaxy A40, dans un certain nombre de domaines, et convainc avec un bon rapport performances / prix.

Si l'on compare l'appareil au Galaxy A51 de 6,5 pouces, qui est également plus cher, à 369 €, la différence de composants et de performances n'est pas si grande. Pour certains, le Galaxy A41 sera ainsi le meilleur choix.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Samsung Galaxy A41 - 06/18/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero

Châssis
84%
Clavier
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositif de pointage
84%
Connectivité
48 / 70 → 68%
Poids
92%
Autonomie
89%
Écran
88%
Performances en jeu
13 / 64 → 21%
Performances dans les applications
57 / 86 → 66%
Chauffe
93%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
68 / 90 → 76%
Appareil photo
62%
Moyenne
73%
79%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Samsung Galaxy A41 : smartphone abordable malgré son écran Super AMOLED
Manuel Masiero, 2020-08- 9 (Update: 2020-08- 9)