Test du Xiaomi Mi Note 10 : champion de la photo à petit prix

Name: Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Brand: Xiaomi

Pléthore de pixels. Énorme batterie, abondance de pixels dans l’appareil photo, watts en nombre dans le chargeur. Avec le Xiaomi Mi Note 10, il y a beaucoup de superlatifs, mais il faudra accepter des performances en retrait. Notre test détaillé montre si l’achat vaut le coup.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduit par Prévots), 12/27/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Exemplaire de test fourni par cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Mi Note Gamme)

Processeur

Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver

Carte graphique

Qualcomm Adreno 618

Mémoire

6144 Mo

Écran

6.47 pouces 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 398 PPP, capacitif, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 5, brillant: oui, HDR, 60 Hz

Disque dur

128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 Go

, 117 Go libres

Connexions

1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrarouge, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, gyroscope, capteur de proximité, boussole

Réseau

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850 / 900 / 1 800 / 1 900), 3G (B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19), 4G (B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B26 / B28 / B38 / B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Taille

Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 9.7 x 157.8 x 74.2

Batterie

5260 mAh Lithium-Polymère

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Système d'exploitation

Android 9.0 Pie

Appareil photo

Appareil photo primaire: 108 MPix f/1,69, OIS, quad-flash LED, vidéos à 2160p / 30 FPS (capteur photo 1) ; 20,0 MP, f/2,2, grand-angle (capteur photo 2) ; 12,0 MP, f/2,0, téléobjectif (capteur photo 3) ; 5,0 MP, f/2,0, téléobjectif, OIS (capteur photo 4) ; 2,0 MP, le
Appareil photo secondaire: 32 MPix f/2,0, vidéos à 1080p / 30 FPS

Fonctionnalités additionnelles

Haut-parleurs: mono sur la tranche inférieure, Clavier: virtuel, chargeur rapide, câble USB, outil pour carte SIM, coque en silicone, 12 Mois Garantie, DAS : 1,107 W/kg (tête), 1,392 W/kg (corps) ; LTE : Cat 15 800 Mb/s (réception), Cat 13 150 Mb/s (envoi), fanless

Poids

208 g, Alimentation: 114 g

Prix

499 euros

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

voir toutes les spécifications

Appareils du comparatif

Note	ratingversion	Date	Modèle	Poids	Drive	Taille	Résolution
83 %	7	12/19	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 SD 730G, Adreno 618	208 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.47"	2340x1080
89 %	6	08/19	Honor 20 Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10	174 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.26"	2340x1080
86 %	7	10/19	Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL SD 855, Adreno 640	190 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.40"	2340x1080
82 %	7	07/19	Google Pixel 3a XL SD 670, Adreno 616	167 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.00"	2160x1080
84 %	6	04/19	Sony Xperia 10 Plus SD 636, Adreno 509	180 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.50"	2520x1080

Comparaison des tailles

Sony Xperia 10 Plus Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Google Pixel 3a XL Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Honor 20 ❌

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3a XL Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash	580 (548^min - 602^max) MBit/s ∼100% +77%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	523 (410^min - 563^max) MBit/s ∼90% +60%
Average of class Smartphone (5.59 - 1599, n=295, last 2 years)	399 MBit/s ∼69% +22%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	327 (321^min - 333^max) MBit/s ∼56%
Honor 20 Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	294 (235^min - 335^max) MBit/s ∼51% -10%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	153 (133^min - 180^max) MBit/s ∼26% -53%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3a XL Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash	668 (617^min - 692^max) MBit/s ∼100% +102%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	447 (201^min - 659^max) MBit/s ∼67% +35%
Average of class Smartphone (15.5 - 1414, n=295, last 2 years)	406 MBit/s ∼61% +23%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	331 (317^min - 341^max) MBit/s ∼50%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	317 (163^min - 343^max) MBit/s ∼47% -4%
Honor 20 Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	302 (80^min - 331^max) MBit/s ∼45% -9%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø331 (317-341)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø327 (321-333)

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

Cliquer pour charger les images

Xiaomi Mi Note 10

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

Cliquer pour charger les images

Xiaomi Mi Note 10

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

Cliquer pour charger les images

Xiaomi Mi Note 10

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 - Appareil photo principal.

ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi Note 10: 6.09 ∆E min: 1.54 - max: 11.16 ∆E

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 - Mire de test avec un bon éclairage.

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 - Mire de test à 1 lux.


587 cd/m²	612 cd/m²	637 cd/m²
577 cd/m²	625 cd/m²	635 cd/m²
570 cd/m²	589 cd/m²	627 cd/m²

Homogénéité de la luminosité

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 637 cd/m² Moyenne: 606.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.46 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 89 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 625 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.38 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
137.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.251

	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47	Honor 20 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.26	Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL IPS, 2340x1080, 6.40	Google Pixel 3a XL OLED, 2160x1080, 6.00	Sony Xperia 10 Plus IPS, 2520x1080, 6.50
Screen		29%	-4%	23%	-30%
Brightness middle	625	481 -23%	569 -9%	409 -35%	572 -8%
Brightness	607	481 -21%	537 -12%	410 -32%	580 -4%
Brightness Distribution	89	95 7%	79 -11%	96 8%	96 8%
Black Level *		0.55	0.31		0.4
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	4.38	1.1 75%	3.5 20%	1.3 70%	4.5 -3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	6.83	2.1 69%	6 12%	2.3 66%	12.2 -79%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	4.1	1.3 68%	5.1 -24%	1.5 63%	7.9 -93%
Gamma	2.251 ^98%	2.12 ^104%	2.36 ^93%	2.22 ^99%	2.16 ^102%
CCT	7251 ^90%	6442 ^101%	6827 ^95%	6621 ^98%	8726 ^74%
Contrast		875	1835		1430

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé

215.5 Hz

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 215.5 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) .

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 215.5 Hz est relativement faible, les personnes les plus sensibles devraient percevoir un scintillement et être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire accrue (avec le niveau de luminosité indiqué)

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9713 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 151500) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.

↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc
8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 5 ms hausse
8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 3 ms chute
L'écran montre de faibles temps de réponse, un bon écran pour jouer. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
10 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 5 ms hausse
10 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 5 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Geekbench 5.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	543 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	344 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (543 - 543, n=2)	543 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 1344, n=45, last 2 years)	503 Points ∼93% -7%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1723 Points ∼98%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1322 Points ∼75% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (1723 - 1729, n=2)	1726 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (807 - 3575, n=45, last 2 years)	1754 Points ∼100% +2%
OpenCL Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1128 Points ∼72%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	737 Points ∼47% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (1123 - 1128, n=2)	1126 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (252 - 4593, n=37, last 2 years)	1570 Points ∼100% +39%
Vulkan Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	891 Points ∼72%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	639 Points ∼52% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (891 - 930, n=2)	911 Points ∼74% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (143 - 3794, n=31, last 2 years)	1231 Points ∼100% +38%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	9052 Points ∼69%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	9825 Points ∼75% +9%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	13047 Points ∼100% +44%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	9397 Points ∼72% +4%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	7181 Points ∼55% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (8941 - 10200, n=7)	9376 Points ∼72% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2689 - 19989, n=235, last 2 years)	9901 Points ∼76% +9%
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	7558 Points ∼77%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	7945 Points ∼81% +5%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9814 Points ∼100% +30%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	7377 Points ∼75% -2%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6018 Points ∼61% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (7134 - 8683, n=7)	7679 Points ∼78% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=269, last 2 years)	7807 Points ∼80% +3%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	39608 Points ∼100%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	35999 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	26999 Points ∼68% -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (33007 - 39608, n=5)	37271 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2920 - 117606, n=220, last 2 years)	39384 Points ∼99% -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	51267 Points ∼90%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	43622 Points ∼77% -15%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	35596 Points ∼63% -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (50829 - 53548, n=5)	52404 Points ∼92% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2177 - 224130, n=220, last 2 years)	56664 Points ∼100% +11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	22054 Points ∼65%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	22337 Points ∼66% +1%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	33697 Points ∼100% +53%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	14631 Points ∼43% -34%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (14820 - 22054, n=5)	18710 Points ∼56% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (8324 - 59268, n=220, last 2 years)	22977 Points ∼68% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3425 Points ∼44%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3347 Points ∼43% -2%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7820 Points ∼100% +128%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2441 Points ∼31% -29%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1469 Points ∼19% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3399 - 3594, n=7)	3490 Points ∼45% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 11256, n=260, last 2 years)	3314 Points ∼42% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3498 Points ∼35%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3292 Points ∼33% -6%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9973 Points ∼100% +185%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2428 Points ∼24% -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1327 Points ∼13% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3485 - 3678, n=7)	3561 Points ∼36% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (54 - 16670, n=260, last 2 years)	3889 Points ∼39% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3191 Points ∼72%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3557 Points ∼80% +11%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4454 Points ∼100% +40%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2489 Points ∼56% -22%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2349 Points ∼53% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3075 - 3371, n=7)	3254 Points ∼73% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 5301, n=260, last 2 years)	2721 Points ∼61% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3535 Points ∼43%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3222 Points ∼40% -9%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8141 Points ∼100% +130%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2528 Points ∼31% -28%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1536 Points ∼19% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3513 - 3704, n=7)	3598 Points ∼44% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (149 - 11895, n=272, last 2 years)	3796 Points ∼47% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3646 Points ∼35%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3459 Points ∼34% -5%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10290 Points ∼100% +182%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2537 Points ∼25% -30%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1397 Points ∼14% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3646 - 3773, n=7)	3710 Points ∼36% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (122 - 22052, n=272, last 2 years)	4779 Points ∼46% +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3193 Points ∼68%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2598 Points ∼55% -19%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4703 Points ∼100% +47%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2495 Points ∼53% -22%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2352 Points ∼50% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3112 - 3390, n=7)	3238 Points ∼69% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (620 - 5765, n=270, last 2 years)	2839 Points ∼60% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2394 Points ∼42%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4062 Points ∼71% +70%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5705 Points ∼100% +138%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1631 Points ∼29% -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	946 Points ∼17% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2388 - 2489, n=7)	2434 Points ∼43% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (78 - 9138, n=258, last 2 years)	2619 Points ∼46% +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2237 Points ∼35%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4184 Points ∼66% +87%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6336 Points ∼100% +183%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1487 Points ∼23% -34%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	808 Points ∼13% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2237 - 2310, n=7)	2270 Points ∼36% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (62 - 11573, n=258, last 2 years)	2789 Points ∼44% +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3171 Points ∼73%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3685 Points ∼85% +16%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4320 Points ∼100% +36%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2466 Points ∼57% -22%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2351 Points ∼54% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3088 - 3350, n=7)	3235 Points ∼75% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (435 - 5318, n=258, last 2 years)	2772 Points ∼64% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2561 Points ∼48%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2928 Points ∼55% +14%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5311 Points ∼100% +107%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1754 Points ∼33% -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1003 Points ∼19% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2561 - 2701, n=7)	2602 Points ∼49% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 9839, n=270, last 2 years)	3106 Points ∼58% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2425 Points ∼34%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3062 Points ∼43% +26%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7069 Points ∼100% +192%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1612 Points ∼23% -34%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	862 Points ∼12% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2425 - 2492, n=7)	2461 Points ∼35% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (73 - 12914, n=270, last 2 years)	3455 Points ∼49% +42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3188 Points ∼98%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2540 Points ∼78% -20%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2840 Points ∼88% -11%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2532 Points ∼78% -21%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2345 Points ∼72% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3058 - 3391, n=7)	3241 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (620 - 5780, n=270, last 2 years)	2903 Points ∼90% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2265 Points ∼51%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2203 Points ∼49% -3%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4454 Points ∼100% +97%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1550 Points ∼35% -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	944 Points ∼21% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2244 - 2310, n=7)	2267 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (419 - 6977, n=212, last 2 years)	2638 Points ∼59% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2153 Points ∼37%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2232 Points ∼39% +4%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5747 Points ∼100% +167%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1416 Points ∼25% -34%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	809 Points ∼14% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2143 - 2199, n=7)	2162 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (341 - 11259, n=212, last 2 years)	2976 Points ∼52% +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2768 Points ∼100%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2106 Points ∼76% -24%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2492 Points ∼90% -10%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2314 Points ∼84% -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2282 Points ∼82% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2621 - 2775, n=7)	2727 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1786 - 4061, n=212, last 2 years)	2646 Points ∼96% -4%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps ∼100%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	56 fps ∼93% -7%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps ∼100% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	53 fps ∼88% -12%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	30 fps ∼50% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (55 - 60, n=6)	58.5 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (8.2 - 143, n=218, last 2 years)	55.8 fps ∼93% -7%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	84 fps ∼50%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	69 fps ∼41% -18%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps ∼100% +99%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	58 fps ∼35% -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	35 fps ∼21% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (83 - 86, n=6)	84.5 fps ∼51% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (4.3 - 322, n=218, last 2 years)	103 fps ∼62% +23%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	38 fps ∼63%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	57 fps ∼95% +50%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps ∼100% +58%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	28 fps ∼47% -26%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	13 fps ∼22% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (25 - 39, n=6)	35.7 fps ∼60% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (4.5 - 120, n=216, last 2 years)	44.1 fps ∼74% +16%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps ∼42%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	41 fps ∼42% 0%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	97 fps ∼100% +137%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	29 fps ∼30% -29%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16 fps ∼16% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (41 - 42, n=6)	41.5 fps ∼43% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 180, n=217, last 2 years)	60.4 fps ∼62% +47%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	27 fps ∼47%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	24 fps ∼42% -11%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	57 fps ∼100% +111%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	19 fps ∼33% -30%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	8.4 fps ∼15% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16 - 29, n=6)	25.5 fps ∼45% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 106, n=214, last 2 years)	34.5 fps ∼61% +28%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps ∼43%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	25 fps ∼36% -17%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	69 fps ∼100% +130%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	20 fps ∼29% -33%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	10 fps ∼14% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (30 - 30, n=6)	30 fps ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 121, n=214, last 2 years)	41.3 fps ∼60% +38%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	15 fps ∼42%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	15 fps ∼42% 0%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	36 fps ∼100% +140%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	11 fps ∼31% -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.1 fps ∼14% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (9.7 - 17, n=6)	14.8 fps ∼41% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.5 - 61, n=213, last 2 years)	21.6 fps ∼60% +44%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps ∼40%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	17 fps ∼40% 0%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps ∼100% +147%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	11 fps ∼26% -35%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.3 fps ∼15% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (17 - 17, n=6)	17 fps ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.8 - 75, n=213, last 2 years)	24.8 fps ∼59% +46%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps ∼44%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	31 fps ∼86% +94%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	36 fps ∼100% +125%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	11 fps ∼31% -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4.9 fps ∼14% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (10 - 17, n=7)	15.4 fps ∼43% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1.5 - 73, n=274, last 2 years)	21.6 fps ∼60% +35%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps ∼43%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	32 fps ∼76% +78%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps ∼100% +133%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	12 fps ∼29% -33%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.1 fps ∼15% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16 - 18, n=7)	17.7 fps ∼42% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.95 - 257, n=274, last 2 years)	24.8 fps ∼59% +38%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	10 fps ∼42%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	21 fps ∼88% +110%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps ∼100% +140%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	7.2 fps ∼30% -28%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	3.2 fps ∼13% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (6.5 - 11, n=7)	9.79 fps ∼41% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=275, last 2 years)	14.3 fps ∼60% +43%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	10 fps ∼63%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	14 fps ∼88% +40%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps ∼100% +60%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	4.5 fps ∼28% -55%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2.2 fps ∼14% -78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (6.3 - 10, n=7)	7.09 fps ∼44% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (0.35 - 101, n=274, last 2 years)	9.85 fps ∼62% -1%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3392 Points ∼63%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4390 Points ∼81% +29%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5397 Points ∼100% +59%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2794 Points ∼52% -18%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1734 Points ∼32% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3268 - 3512, n=6)	3391 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (323 - 6959, n=202, last 2 years)	3551 Points ∼66% +5%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	6445 Points ∼71%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	7639 Points ∼84% +19%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9094 Points ∼100% +41%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	5507 Points ∼61% -15%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4342 Points ∼48% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (6305 - 6796, n=6)	6610 Points ∼73% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1160 - 14189, n=202, last 2 years)	6512 Points ∼72% +1%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	4281 Points ∼57%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5683 Points ∼76% +33%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7500 Points ∼100% +75%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	3316 Points ∼44% -23%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1236 Points ∼16% -71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3678 - 4544, n=6)	4056 Points ∼54% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (522 - 9044, n=202, last 2 years)	4156 Points ∼55% -3%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3878 Points ∼41%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	6681 Points ∼71% +72%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9416 Points ∼100% +143%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2815 Points ∼30% -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1611 Points ∼17% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3840 - 3984, n=6)	3883 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (349 - 16996, n=202, last 2 years)	5486 Points ∼58% +41%
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1237 Points ∼94%
Honor 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	1281 Points ∼97% +4%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1321 Points ∼100% +7%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1186 Points ∼90% -4%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1046 Points ∼79% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (1190 - 1365, n=6)	1286 Points ∼97% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2169, n=202, last 2 years)	1252 Points ∼95% +1%

AnTuTu v8
Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	266417 Points ∼80%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	190804 Points ∼57% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (251673 - 275660, n=6)	266066 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (53335 - 727247, n=179, last 2 years)	333830 Points ∼100% +25%
CPU (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	94730 Points ∼88%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	67765 Points ∼63% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (94730 - 98091, n=6)	96840 Points ∼90% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (23816 - 195269, n=179, last 2 years)	107405 Points ∼100% +13%
GPU (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	70647 Points ∼65%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	49142 Points ∼45% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (51860 - 73534, n=6)	68413 Points ∼63% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (4095 - 316175, n=179, last 2 years)	108529 Points ∼100% +54%
MEM (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	51664 Points ∼87%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	36690 Points ∼62% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (43432 - 51869, n=6)	49131 Points ∼83% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (9394 - 122714, n=179, last 2 years)	59379 Points ∼100% +15%
UX (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	49376 Points ∼85%
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	37207 Points ∼64% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (49187 - 56366, n=6)	51653 Points ∼89% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (6969 - 115354, n=180, last 2 years)	58104 Points ∼100% +18%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)	59.651 Points ∼100% +30%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=185, last 2 years)	49.7 Points ∼83% +8%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)	49.159 Points ∼82% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (45.8 - 50.6, n=6)	47.3 Points ∼79% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	46.038 Points ∼77%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	32.083 Points ∼54% -30%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	25.96 Points ∼44% -44%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)	112.17 Points ∼100% +42%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)	97.57 Points ∼87% +23%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=192, last 2 years)	88.6 Points ∼79% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (79.2 - 87.7, n=6)	84 Points ∼75% +6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	79.228 Points ∼71%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	57.573 Points ∼51% -27%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)	66.7 runs/min ∼100% +54%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)	58.3 runs/min ∼87% +35%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=163, last 2 years)	50.9 runs/min ∼76% +18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	43.3 runs/min ∼65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (40.4 - 44.2, n=6)	42.7 runs/min ∼64% -1%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	32.5 runs/min ∼49% -25%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	27.4 runs/min ∼41% -37%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)	108 Points ∼100% +40%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)	86 Points ∼80% +12%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=203, last 2 years)	77.6 Points ∼72% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	77 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (66 - 77, n=6)	69.8 Points ∼65% -9%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	62 Points ∼57% -19%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	54 Points ∼50% -30%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)	24313 Points ∼100% +50%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)	21358 Points ∼88% +32%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=212, last 2 years)	17077 Points ∼70% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16197 - 17768, n=6)	16793 Points ∼69% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	16241 Points ∼67%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	11056 Points ∼45% -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	8163 Points ∼34% -50%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	4739 ms * ∼100% -71%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=215, last 2 years)	4167 ms * ∼88% -50%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	3360.7 ms * ∼71% -21%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)	3098.1 ms * ∼65% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2770 - 3054, n=6)	2898 ms * ∼61% -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	2769.8 ms * ∼58%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)	2029.5 ms * ∼43% +27%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

	Xiaomi Mi Note 10	Honor 20	Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL	Google Pixel 3a XL	Sony Xperia 10 Plus	Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		34%	33%	-25%	-43%	-2%	25%
Sequential Read 256KB	480.5	829.3 73%	831.4 73%	315.6 -34%	280.34 -42%	511 (409 - 941, n=29) 6%	729 (41.9 - 2037, n=280, last 2 years) 52%
Sequential Write 256KB	243.6	196.41 -19%	195.6 -20%	179.09 -26%	205.19 -16%	209 (143 - 466, n=29) -14%	314 (11.9 - 1321, n=280, last 2 years) 29%
Random Read 4KB	106.2	156.7 48%	153.29 44%	92.12 -13%	77.67 -27%	127 (88.4 - 173, n=29) 20%	130 (13.5 - 325, n=280, last 2 years) 22%
Random Write 4KB	118.9	156.98 32%	160.18 35%	86.96 -27%	16.77 -86%	96 (13.5 - 187, n=29) -19%	115 (4.97 - 330, n=280, last 2 years) -3%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard			87.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		83.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	68.3 (30.2 - 86, n=20)	76 (13.4 - 154, n=182, last 2 years)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard			62.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		58.44 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	53.2 (28.6 - 70.2, n=20)	58 (1.7 - 83.3, n=182, last 2 years)

; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.32.1.2: Ø60.5 (58-61)

; Arena of Valor; min; 1.32.1.2: Ø60.4 (44-61)

; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.9.3a: Ø29.5 (23-31)

; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.9.3a: Ø29.5 (20-31)

; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.20.0: Ø58.4 (41-61)

; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.20.0: Ø58.1 (48-61)

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge


36.1 °C	39.3 °C	38.9 °C
36.7 °C	38.5 °C	38.6 °C
36.5 °C	37.9 °C	37.9 °C

Maximum: 39.3 °C
Moyenne: 37.8 °C


36.4 °C	38.5 °C	35.9 °C
36.6 °C	36.8 °C	36.1 °C
37.3 °C	36.6 °C	35.6 °C

Maximum: 38.5 °C
Moyenne: 36.6 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 41.6 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 20.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Honor 20 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique

Éteint/en veille	0 / 0.2 Watts
Au repos	0.7 / 1.8 / 2.2 Watts
Fortement sollicité	5.2 / 7.5 Watts


Légende: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5260 mAh	Honor 20 3750 mAh	Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL 5000 mAh	Google Pixel 3a XL 3700 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 Plus 3000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-8%	-14%	24%	5%	-1%	-2%
Idle Minimum *	0.7	0.88 -26%	0.81 -16%	0.7 -0%	0.68 3%	0.84 (0.49 - 1.55, n=6) -20%	0.933 (0.37 - 2.5, n=231, last 2 years) -33%
Idle Average *	1.8	2.27 -26%	2.35 -31%	1.63 9%	2.12 -18%	1.953 (0.96 - 4.91, n=6) -9%	1.843 (0.82 - 3.94, n=231, last 2 years) -2%
Idle Maximum *	2.2	2.34 -6%	2.37 -8%	1.67 24%	2.17 1%	2.26 (1 - 5.02, n=6) -3%	2.12 (0.85 - 4.2, n=231, last 2 years) 4%
Load Average *	5.2	4.81 7%	5.33 -3%	2.64 49%	3.82 27%	4.51 (3.11 - 5.38, n=6) 13%	4.43 (2.1 - 8.4, n=231, last 2 years) 15%
Load Maximum *	7.5	6.63 12%	8.55 -14%	4.62 38%	6.44 14%	6.63 (5.23 - 7.5, n=6) 12%	7.22 (3.16 - 12.3, n=231, last 2 years) 4%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie

Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)		35h 34min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		18h 47min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p		23h 43min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)		6h 27min

	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5260 mAh	Honor 20 3750 mAh	Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL 5000 mAh	Google Pixel 3a XL 3700 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 Plus 3000 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie		-47%	7%	-28%	-47%
Reader / Idle	2134	1262 -41%	2114 -1%	1822 -15%	1400 -34%
H.264	1423	606 -57%	2138 50%	960 -33%	701 -51%
WiFi v1.3	1127	654 -42%	801 -29%	709 -37%	635 -44%
Load	387	208 -46%	409 6%	289 -25%	154 -60%

Points positifs

+ photos très nettes

+ zoom optique x5

+ écran AMOLED lumineux

+ audio jack 3,5 mm

+ autonomie

+ charge rapide

+ chauffe

+ tactile précis

+ rapport performances / prix

Points négatifs

- plage dynamique des photos en basse luminosité

- appareil photo principal avec flou artificiel

- seulement 12 mois de garantie

- pas de lecteur micro SD

- qualité d'appel

- poids

En test : le Xiaomi Mi Note 10. Modèle de test fourni par :

Le Xiaomi Mi Note 10 est plutôt impressionnant dans certains domaines : pour moins de 500 €, vous aurez un smartphone pour la photo excellent et polyvalent, qui marque des points avec une bonne netteté, des détails bien pris, et de belles couleurs. L’écran AMOLED lumineux est également séduisant, le stockage est bien jaugé, et on retrouve une prise jack 3,5 mm.

Les modules de communication soulignent néanmoins que l’on n’est pas dans le haut du panier : la vitesse LTE maximale est bonne, mais largement inférieure à celle des fleurons actuels. Le Wifi ne se maintient pas non plus à leur niveau, et le lecteur de carte micro SD est absent.

Mais avant tout, les performances en baisse attireront les critiques de ceux qui utilisent des applis exigeantes : le Mi Note 10 est tout simplement à la traîne dans ce domaine. Pourquoi Xiaomi choisit-il un SoC lent quand, par exemple, l’Asus ZenFone 6 montre que l’on peut proposer un Snapdragon 855pour le même prix ? Sans doute parce que le 730G est malgré tout excellent en photo...

Une excellent appareil photo et un écran AMOLED lumineux pour un coût réduit : si vous pouvez accepter des performances un peu en retrait, alors le Xiaomi Mi Note 10 sera votre premier choix.

Si vous prenez en compte le prix du Xiaomi Mi Note 10, alors il n’y a pas vraiment de meilleure offre en ce moment si vous cherchez un appareil photo parmi les meilleurs, et une excellente autonomie.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 - 2019-12-20 12/20/2019 v7
Florian Schmitt

Châssis

86%

Clavier

69 / 75 → 92%

Dispositif de pointage

96%

Connectivité

48 / 70 → 69%

Poids

88%

Autonomie

93%

Écran

85%

Performances en jeu

28 / 64 → 44%

Performances dans les applications

68 / 86 → 79%

Chauffe

90%

Nuisance sonore

100%

Audio

74 / 90 → 82%

Appareil photo

74%

Moyenne

77%

83%

Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Linked Articles

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Mi Note Gamme)

Critique

•

Test du Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite...

Actualité

•

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite : Smart...

Critique

•

Test du Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro ...

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!