Notebookcheck

Test du Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G : plus rapide qu'un Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra ?

5G pour 200 €. Le Redmi 10X est un smartphone du milieu de gamme abordable, au bel écran AMOLED et au processeur MediaTek Dimensity 820 puissant. Nous avons été agréablement surpris par la rapidité du lecteur d'empreintes digitales optique intégré à l'écran, ce qui est réussi pour un appareil à ce prix, et qui n'est pas vraiment plus lent que la solution à ultrasons des Samsung Galaxy S20.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Felicitas Krohn (traduit par Prévots), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Redmi 10 Gamme)
Processeur
MediaTek Dimensity 820 8 x 2 - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Carte graphique
Mémoire
8192 Mo 
Écran
6.57 pouces 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPP, capacitif, AMOLED, brillant: oui, HDR, 60 Hz
Disque dur
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 Go 
, 106 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: capteur de proximité, accéléromètre, gyroscope, boussole, OTG, Miracast, emetteur IR
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G : n1 / n3 / n41 / n78 / n79 ; 4G : FDD-LTE : B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 TDD-LTE : B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41; 3G: B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B8 CDMA EVDO : BC0 ; 2G : B2 / B3 / B5 / B8 CDMA 1X : BC0, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.99 x 164.2 x 75.8
Batterie
4520 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Android 10
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 48 MPix (1,6 um (4 in 1), FOV 79 °) + 8 MP (téléobjectif, OIS) + 8 MP (grand-angle, FOV 119 °) + 5 MP (macro)
Appareil photo secondaire: 20 MPix (FOV 78.5 °)
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, chargeur 22,5 W, câble USB, étui de protection, MiUI 12, 12 Mois Garantie, Widevine L3, fanless
Poids
208 g, Alimentation: 89 g
Prix
220 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
relation de la recherche.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Appareils du comparatif

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Drive
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
84 %
10/20
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5
208 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2400x1080
83 %
08/20
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
79 %
08/20
Samsung Galaxy A41
Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2
152 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.10"2400x1080
80 %
08/20
realme 6 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
195 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2400x1080
79 %
01/20
Oppo A91
Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.40"2400x1080
76 %
07/20
Nokia 5.3
SD 665, Adreno 610
185 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.55"1600x720
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone

Comparaison des tailles

165.75 mm 76.68 mm 8.8 mm 209 g164.2 mm 75.8 mm 8.99 mm 208 g164.3 mm 76.6 mm 8.5 mm 185 g163.8 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 195 g160.2 mm 73.3 mm 7.9 mm 172 g149.9 mm 69.8 mm 7.9 mm 152 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Mali-G57 MP5, Dimensity 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
687 (642min - 704max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=296, last 2 years)
398 MBit/s ∼58% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
349 (339min - 355max) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Oppo A91
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
332 (312min - 337max) MBit/s ∼48% -52%
realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
290 (137min - 336max) MBit/s ∼42% -58%
Nokia 5.3
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
163 (25min - 258max) MBit/s ∼24% -76%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Mali-G57 MP5, Dimensity 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
634 (495min - 650max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
619 (283min - 670max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=296, last 2 years)
405 MBit/s ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
365 (349min - 370max) MBit/s ∼58% -42%
Oppo A91
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
294 (80min - 338max) MBit/s ∼46% -54%
realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
292 (145min - 352max) MBit/s ∼46% -54%
Nokia 5.3
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
145 (20min - 215max) MBit/s ∼23% -77%
04080120160200240280320360400440480520560600640680495587644642644640642630640634646645644649647640647637631642646629644621640650638638629642495587644642644640642630640634646645644649647640647637631642646629644621640650638638629642652697699695700666700695689696642685692701701689702701700695701692646648655679704701701698Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø633 (495-650)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø687 (642-704)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G - Ultra-grand-angle.
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G - Ultra-grand-angle.
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G - Appareil photo principal.
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G - Appareil photo principal.
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G - Zoom x2.
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G - Zoom x2.
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G - Zoom x10 (max).
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G - Zoom x10 (max).

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

HauptkameraLow LightHauptkameraWeitwinkel
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker
10.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G: 7.11 ∆E min: 2.98 - max: 13.63 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.5 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
47.9 ∆E
19 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
40.4 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
32 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G: 31.4 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 47.92 ∆E
598
cd/m²
601
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
599
cd/m²
608
cd/m²
611
cd/m²
608
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
622
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 622 cd/m² Moyenne: 608 cd/m² Minimum: 3.44 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 96 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 608 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.99 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.291
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.57
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy A41
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.10
realme 6 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.60
Oppo A91
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Nokia 5.3
IPS, 1600x720, 6.55
Screen
24%
19%
-30%
-27%
-39%
Brightness middle
608
610
0%
554
-9%
442
-27%
594
-2%
523
-14%
Brightness
608
579
-5%
559
-8%
419
-31%
613
1%
482
-21%
Brightness Distribution
96
92
-4%
92
-4%
90
-6%
89
-7%
86
-10%
Black Level *
0.37
0.37
0.46
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.99
1.8
55%
2
50%
6.1
-53%
6.1
-53%
6.22
-56%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.65
3
74%
7.7
34%
9.7
17%
10.6
9%
10.56
9%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.3
2.5
24%
1.6
52%
5.9
-79%
7
-112%
8
-142%
Gamma
2.291 96%
2.31 95%
2.11 104%
2.35 94%
2.28 96%
2.226 99%
CCT
7023 93%
6864 95%
6589 99%
7631 85%
7370 88%
8856 73%
Contrast
1649
1195
1137

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 227.3 Hz

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 227.3 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) .

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 227.3 Hz est relativement faible, les personnes les plus sensibles devraient percevoir un scintillement et être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire accrue (avec le niveau de luminosité indiqué)

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9689 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 151500) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 5 ms hausse
↘ 3 ms chute
L'écran montre de faibles temps de réponse, un bon écran pour jouer.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
10 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 5 ms hausse
↘ 5 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
652 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
569 Points ∼61% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
357 Points ∼38% -45%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
567 Points ∼60% -13%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
320 Points ∼34% -51%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
282 Points ∼30% -57%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
312 Points ∼33% -52%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
620 Points ∼66% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
742 Points ∼79% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
940 Points ∼100% +44%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
652 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=216, last 2 years)
559 Points ∼59% -14%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
2678 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1771 Points ∼62% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1222 Points ∼43% -54%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1759 Points ∼62% -34%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1475 Points ∼52% -45%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1430 Points ∼50% -47%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1350 Points ∼47% -50%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1854 Points ∼65% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2856 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
2787 Points ∼98% +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
2678 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=216, last 2 years)
1925 Points ∼67% -28%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
2456 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4789 Points ∼100% +95%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
2456 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=108, last 2 years)
2030 Points ∼42% -17%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3009 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
5532 Points ∼100% +84%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3009 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=112, last 2 years)
2124 Points ∼38% -29%
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3022 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1711 Points ∼34% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼71% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4965 Points ∼100% +64%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3022 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (412 - 5099, n=80, last 2 years)
2508 Points ∼51% -17%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
10658 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5097 Points ∼41% -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼88% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
12561 Points ∼100% +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
10658 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1163 - 14895, n=80, last 2 years)
7674 Points ∼61% -28%
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
8214 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4073 Points ∼50% -50%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼91% -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
8214 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1673 - 12228, n=67, last 2 years)
6602 Points ∼80% -20%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
16302 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
9091 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7594 Points ∼47% -53%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
13777 Points ∼85% -15%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8538 Points ∼52% -48%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9955 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼67% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
14551 Points ∼89% -11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
16302 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=236, last 2 years)
9876 Points ∼61% -39%
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
11263 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7829 Points ∼66% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6742 Points ∼57% -40%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
10106 Points ∼86% -10%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
8185 Points ∼69% -27%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6775 Points ∼57% -40%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8456 Points ∼72% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼77% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
11784 Points ∼100% +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
11263 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=270, last 2 years)
7791 Points ∼66% -31%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
37153 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38315 Points ∼57% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
20885 Points ∼31% -44%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
33926 Points ∼50% -9%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
23447 Points ∼35% -37%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24065 Points ∼36% -35%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
44531 Points ∼66% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼92% +67%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
67590 Points ∼100% +82%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
37153 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=221, last 2 years)
39231 Points ∼58% +6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
38974 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
51789 Points ∼49% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
22232 Points ∼21% -43%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
53600 Points ∼50% +38%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
23159 Points ∼22% -41%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15403 Points ∼14% -60%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69645 Points ∼65% +79%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼100% +173%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
84533 Points ∼79% +117%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
38974 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=221, last 2 years)
56434 Points ∼53% +45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
32166 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20054 Points ∼50% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
17231 Points ∼43% -46%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
14849 Points ∼37% -54%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
24514 Points ∼62% -24%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20320 Points ∼51% -37%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19658 Points ∼49% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼64% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
39724 Points ∼100% +23%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
32166 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 59268, n=221, last 2 years)
22894 Points ∼58% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
5267 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3534 Points ∼49% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1229 Points ∼17% -77%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3528 Points ∼49% -33%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1899 Points ∼27% -64%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1795 Points ∼25% -66%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4561 Points ∼64% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7152 Points ∼100% +36%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
5267 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=260, last 2 years)
3314 Points ∼46% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
5996 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3620 Points ∼36% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1093 Points ∼11% -82%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3683 Points ∼37% -39%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1767 Points ∼18% -71%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1663 Points ∼17% -72%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5148 Points ∼52% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +66%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9480 Points ∼95% +58%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
5996 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=260, last 2 years)
3889 Points ∼39% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3745 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3263 Points ∼85% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2181 Points ∼57% -42%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3076 Points ∼80% -18%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2568 Points ∼67% -31%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2482 Points ∼65% -34%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3259 Points ∼85% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼94% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3846 Points ∼100% +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3745 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=260, last 2 years)
2721 Points ∼71% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
5469 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3645 Points ∼49% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1630 Points ∼22% -70%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3651 Points ∼49% -33%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1885 Points ∼25% -66%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1810 Points ∼24% -67%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4621 Points ∼62% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7385 Points ∼99% +35%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
5469 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=272, last 2 years)
3796 Points ∼51% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
5991 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3785 Points ∼37% -37%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1486 Points ∼14% -75%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3835 Points ∼37% -36%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1747 Points ∼17% -71%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1692 Points ∼16% -72%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5356 Points ∼52% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼100% +72%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9536 Points ∼93% +59%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
5991 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=272, last 2 years)
4779 Points ∼46% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4169 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3226 Points ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2466 Points ∼59% -41%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3125 Points ∼75% -25%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2606 Points ∼63% -37%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2396 Points ∼57% -43%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3099 Points ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4127 Points ∼99% -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4169 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=270, last 2 years)
2839 Points ∼68% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4568 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2499 Points ∼38% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1160 Points ∼17% -75%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2514 Points ∼38% -45%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1276 Points ∼19% -72%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1152 Points ∼17% -75%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3301 Points ∼50% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼83% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6658 Points ∼100% +46%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4568 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=259, last 2 years)
2609 Points ∼39% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4769 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2356 Points ∼29% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1016 Points ∼12% -79%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2388 Points ∼29% -50%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1117 Points ∼14% -77%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
999 Points ∼12% -79%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3259 Points ∼40% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼78% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8156 Points ∼100% +71%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4769 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=259, last 2 years)
2778 Points ∼34% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3963 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3170 Points ∼78% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2296 Points ∼57% -42%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3083 Points ∼76% -22%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2550 Points ∼63% -36%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2476 Points ∼61% -38%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3395 Points ∼84% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼93% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4052 Points ∼100% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3963 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=259, last 2 years)
2766 Points ∼68% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4497 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2667 Points ∼39% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1179 Points ∼17% -74%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2656 Points ∼39% -41%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1265 Points ∼19% -72%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1148 Points ∼17% -74%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3501 Points ∼51% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼87% +31%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6830 Points ∼100% +52%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4497 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=271, last 2 years)
3095 Points ∼45% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4798 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2539 Points ∼31% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1028 Points ∼12% -79%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2558 Points ∼31% -47%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1102 Points ∼13% -77%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
999 Points ∼12% -79%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3569 Points ∼43% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼86% +47%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8239 Points ∼100% +72%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4798 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=271, last 2 years)
3443 Points ∼42% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3969 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3236 Points ∼76% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2427 Points ∼57% -39%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3067 Points ∼72% -23%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2621 Points ∼61% -34%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2409 Points ∼56% -39%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3301 Points ∼77% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼88% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4273 Points ∼100% +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3969 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=271, last 2 years)
2896 Points ∼68% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4069 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2340 Points ∼45% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1148 Points ∼22% -72%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2317 Points ∼45% -43%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1248 Points ∼24% -69%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1140 Points ∼22% -72%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3065 Points ∼59% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points ∼95% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
5178 Points ∼100% +27%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4069 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 6977, n=212, last 2 years)
2638 Points ∼51% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4427 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2250 Points ∼35% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1005 Points ∼16% -77%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2255 Points ∼35% -49%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1103 Points ∼17% -75%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
995 Points ∼16% -78%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3147 Points ∼49% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points ∼90% +29%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6378 Points ∼100% +44%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4427 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 11259, n=212, last 2 years)
2976 Points ∼47% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3168 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2721 Points ∼83% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2281 Points ∼69% -28%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2562 Points ∼78% -19%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2304 Points ∼70% -27%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2321 Points ∼71% -27%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2756 Points ∼84% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3122 Points ∼95% -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3168 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=212, last 2 years)
2646 Points ∼80% -16%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
60 fps ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼55% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
37 fps ∼34% -38%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
60 fps ∼55% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
61 fps ∼55% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼55% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
110 fps ∼100% +83%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
60 fps ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=219, last 2 years)
55.7 fps ∼51% -7%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
115 fps ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
85 fps ∼51% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
39 fps ∼23% -66%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
85 fps ∼51% -26%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
94 fps ∼56% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +45%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
145 fps ∼87% +26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
115 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=219, last 2 years)
103 fps ∼62% -10%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
57 fps ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼43% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
20 fps ∼22% -65%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
38 fps ∼42% -33%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼56% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼67% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
90 fps ∼100% +58%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
57 fps ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=217, last 2 years)
43.9 fps ∼49% -23%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
71 fps ∼71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼41% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
21 fps ∼21% -70%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
41 fps ∼41% -42%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
56 fps ∼56% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100% +41%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
96 fps ∼96% +35%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
71 fps ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=218, last 2 years)
60.1 fps ∼60% -15%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
44 fps ∼72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼48% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼21% -70%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
27 fps ∼44% -39%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼56% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼95% +32%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
61 fps ∼100% +39%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
44 fps ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=215, last 2 years)
34.3 fps ∼56% -22%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
52 fps ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼43% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼19% -75%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼43% -42%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼55% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
65 fps ∼94% +25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
52 fps ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=215, last 2 years)
41.2 fps ∼60% -21%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
25 fps ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼45% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.7 fps ∼20% -69%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼42% -36%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼50% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +52%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
34 fps ∼89% +36%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
25 fps ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=214, last 2 years)
21.5 fps ∼57% -14%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
29 fps ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼43% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8.1 fps ∼19% -72%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼43% -38%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼50% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +45%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
38 fps ∼90% +31%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
29 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=214, last 2 years)
24.7 fps ∼59% -15%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
29 fps ∼59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼35% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps ∼15% -74%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼35% -41%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
7.5 fps ∼15% -74%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
14 fps ∼29% -52%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼43% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼76% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
49 fps ∼100% +69%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
29 fps ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=275, last 2 years)
21.6 fps ∼44% -26%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
32 fps ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼42% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps ∼17% -77%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
19 fps ∼44% -41%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
8.8 fps ∼20% -72%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.3 fps ∼19% -74%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼56% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼95% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
43 fps ∼100% +34%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
32 fps ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=275, last 2 years)
24.7 fps ∼57% -23%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
18 fps ∼53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼32% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4.9 fps ∼14% -73%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
11 fps ∼32% -39%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
4.5 fps ∼13% -75%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.8 fps ∼26% -51%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼38% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼71% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
34 fps ∼100% +89%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
18 fps ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=276, last 2 years)
14.3 fps ∼42% -21%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
12 fps ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.9 fps ∼31% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2.8 fps ∼13% -77%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
7 fps ∼32% -42%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2.9 fps ∼13% -76%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼13% -77%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼39% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼73% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
22 fps ∼100% +83%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
12 fps ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=275, last 2 years)
9.81 fps ∼45% -18%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
401419 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
271934 Points ∼52% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
157473 Points ∼30% -61%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
275464 Points ∼52% -31%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
326795 Points ∼62% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
440822 Points ∼84% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
527820 Points ∼100% +31%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
401419 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=179, last 2 years)
333830 Points ∼63% -17%
VRMark - Amber Room (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4420 Score ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1164 Score ∼23% -74%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4964 Score ∼100% +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4420 Score ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 7649, n=56, last 2 years)
3290 Score ∼66% -26%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3636 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3444 Points ∼72% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1901 Points ∼40% -48%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3481 Points ∼73% -4%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3931 Points ∼82% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼96% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4791 Points ∼100% +32%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3636 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=203, last 2 years)
3537 Points ∼74% -3%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
7258 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6856 Points ∼76% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5142 Points ∼57% -29%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
6908 Points ∼77% -5%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6685 Points ∼74% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼94% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9024 Points ∼100% +24%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
7258 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=203, last 2 years)
6490 Points ∼72% -11%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3996 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4452 Points ∼92% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2148 Points ∼44% -46%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
4573 Points ∼94% +14%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4856 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼83% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3811 Points ∼78% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3996 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=203, last 2 years)
4139 Points ∼85% +4%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4264 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3757 Points ∼35% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1113 Points ∼10% -74%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3768 Points ∼35% -12%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5216 Points ∼49% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼87% +117%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10646 Points ∼100% +150%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4264 Points ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=203, last 2 years)
5461 Points ∼51% +28%
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
1407 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1226 Points ∼85% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1062 Points ∼74% -25%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1233 Points ∼86% -12%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1412 Points ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼96% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
1439 Points ∼100% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
1407 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=203, last 2 years)
1249 Points ∼87% -11%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=185, last 2 years)
49.7 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
47.901 Points ∼96% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
45 Points ∼91% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)
44.974 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
32.643 Points ∼66% -27%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
89.577 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=193, last 2 years)
88.2 Points ∼98% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
86.75 Points ∼97% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)
86.647 Points ∼97%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
86.6 Points ∼97% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
55.972 Points ∼62% -35%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=163, last 2 years)
50.9 runs/min ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)
47.6 runs/min ∼94%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
47.6 runs/min ∼94% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
45.2 runs/min ∼89% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
27.8 runs/min ∼55% -42%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=204, last 2 years)
77.3 Points ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
71 Points ∼92% +9%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
67 Points ∼87% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)
65 Points ∼84%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
65 Points ∼84% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
52 Points ∼67% -20%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)
18974 Points ∼100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
18974 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
17265 Points ∼91% -9%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
17157 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=213, last 2 years)
17006 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
10499 Points ∼55% -45%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=216, last 2 years)
4242 ms * ∼100% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
3778.9 ms * ∼89% -25%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
3033.1 ms * ∼72% -0%
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)
3032.1 ms * ∼71%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
3032 ms * ∼71% -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
2850.1 ms * ∼67% +6%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 9 ProSamsung Galaxy A41realme 6 ProOppo A91Nokia 5.3Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-41%
-44%
-31%
-43%
-45%
-31%
-32%
Sequential Read 256KB
999.36
498.15
-50%
299.89
-70%
512.61
-49%
505.44
-49%
299.5
-70%
772 (427 - 999, n=81)
-23%
728 (41.9 - 2037, n=281, last 2 years)
-27%
Sequential Write 256KB
479.45
171.09
-64%
211.05
-56%
203.28
-58%
185.26
-61%
243.2
-49%
256 (182 - 511, n=81)
-47%
313 (11.9 - 1321, n=281, last 2 years)
-35%
Random Read 4KB
239.4
122.58
-49%
84
-65%
158.66
-34%
145.64
-39%
109.1
-54%
145 (92.6 - 239, n=81)
-39%
130 (13.5 - 325, n=281, last 2 years)
-46%
Random Write 4KB
289.64
112.93
-61%
72.53
-75%
154
-47%
28.55
-90%
45.2
-84%
118 (18.2 - 290, n=81)
-59%
114 (4.97 - 330, n=281, last 2 years)
-61%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
83.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
86.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
77.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-9%
77.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
76 (13.4 - 88.3, n=43)
-10%
76 (13.4 - 154, n=183, last 2 years)
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
54.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-15%
67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
63.43 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
60.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
60.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
59.6 (8.4 - 72.4, n=43)
-8%
58 (1.7 - 83.3, n=183, last 2 years)
-10%
PUBG mobile
0510152025303540455055606061596160606060606060605960605959606060615861606159586060615961605960606158606160605961605960596159616060615961596159606060606159616060606060606060596060595960606061586160615958606061596160596060615860616060596160596059615961606061596159615960606041404040394139404041403941394140394139414040394041394139413940413941394139404139413940413941394040404139404041394040404139413940404041606159616060606060606060596060595960606061586160615958606061596160596060615860616060596160596059615961606061596159615960606041404040394139404041403941394140394139414040394041394139413940413941394139404139413940413941394040404139404041394040404139413940404041404040404040404040404040404040404040394140394040404040404040403941394139414039413941394139404140403941403941394139404039414041394040404040404039404040404039404040404040404040404040404039394140394041404039414039413941Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø59.9 (58-61)
; Balanced: Ø40 (39-41)
; HD: Ø40 (39-41)
Dead Trigger 2
05101520253035404550556061606160606159616061606061606160616060616060606061606160616060606061605960606160616060616061606160606160616061605961606160616060616061606061606160616059616061606160606160616060606061606160606160616061606061606160615960616061606159606160616060616061Tooltip
: Ø60.3 (59-61)
051015202530303129312930303031303029303031303030293129303129293030303031293031293030303030303030303030303030312931302930303030312630303028282925303030303030303030303030303030303031293030303030312930303030303130293030312630303031293128302830Tooltip
: Ø29.8 (25-31)
 43.5 °C41.3 °C37.4 °C 
 42.6 °C41 °C37.4 °C 
 41.3 °C39.7 °C37.7 °C 
Maximum: 43.5 °C
Moyenne: 40.2 °C
32.8 °C39.2 °C40.7 °C
33.7 °C39.2 °C40 °C
34.2 °C39 °C39.5 °C
Maximum: 40.7 °C
Moyenne: 37.6 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  42.5 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.538.52536.236.63127.326.44033.536.35033.434.56323.524.68022.619.81002223.112520.824.416017.936.920013.341.425012.24531512.249.940012.455.150013.459.863013.464.980017.666.5100016.670.6125014.369.1160012.569.720001367.7250013.864.4315014.857.2400016.661.6500017.367.5630018.271.980001975.31000019.668.31250019.655.51600020.352.3SPL57.366.228.380.5N11.119.5146.9median 16.6median 61.6Delta2.710.734.829.419.626.323.92524.324.730.533.418.726.820.422.518.621.417.517.419.532.919.239.416.448.315.254.314.25714.760.413.862.514.66714.168.613.568.414.473.113.976.513.878.413.873.714.772.414.275.414.473.714.974.61563.415.152.315.350.126.585.50.859.7median 14.7median 63.40.813.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 10X 5GSamsung Galaxy A41
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A41 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.2 / 0.3 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 1.6 / 1.9 / 2.1 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 5.1 / 8.9 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
4520 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A41
3500 mAh
realme 6 Pro
4300 mAh
Oppo A91
4025 mAh
Nokia 5.3
4000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
18%
33%
13%
32%
0%
15%
Idle Minimum *
1.6
0.75
53%
0.96
40%
0.92