Test du Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G : plus rapide qu'un Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra ?

5G pour 200 €. Le Redmi 10X est un smartphone du milieu de gamme abordable, au bel écran AMOLED et au processeur MediaTek Dimensity 820 puissant. Nous avons été agréablement surpris par la rapidité du lecteur d'empreintes digitales optique intégré à l'écran, ce qui est réussi pour un appareil à ce prix, et qui n'est pas vraiment plus lent que la solution à ultrasons des Samsung Galaxy S20.

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduit par Prévots), 10/18/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Exemplaire de test fourni par tradingshenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Redmi 10 Gamme)

Processeur

MediaTek Dimensity 820 8 x 2 - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55

Carte graphique

ARM Mali-G57 MP5

Mémoire

8192 Mo

Écran

6.57 pouces 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPP, capacitif, AMOLED, brillant: oui, HDR, 60 Hz

Disque dur

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 Go

, 106 Go libres

Connexions

1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: capteur de proximité, accéléromètre, gyroscope, boussole, OTG, Miracast, emetteur IR

Réseau

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G : n1 / n3 / n41 / n78 / n79 ; 4G : FDD-LTE : B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 TDD-LTE : B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41; 3G: B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B8 CDMA EVDO : BC0 ; 2G : B2 / B3 / B5 / B8 CDMA 1X : BC0, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Taille

Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.99 x 164.2 x 75.8

Batterie

4520 mAh Lithium-Polymère

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Système d'exploitation

Android 10

Appareil photo

Appareil photo primaire: 48 MPix (1,6 um (4 in 1), FOV 79 °) + 8 MP (téléobjectif, OIS) + 8 MP (grand-angle, FOV 119 °) + 5 MP (macro)
Appareil photo secondaire: 20 MPix (FOV 78.5 °)

Fonctionnalités additionnelles

Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, chargeur 22,5 W, câble USB, étui de protection, MiUI 12, 12 Mois Garantie, Widevine L3, fanless

Poids

208 g, Alimentation: 89 g

Prix

220 euros

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

voir toutes les spécifications

Appareils du comparatif

Note	Date	Modèle	Poids	Drive	Taille	Résolution
84 %	10/20	Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5	208 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.57"	2400x1080
83 %	08/20	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618	209 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
79 %	08/20	Samsung Galaxy A41 Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2	152 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.10"	2400x1080
80 %	08/20	realme 6 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618	195 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.60"	2400x1080
79 %	01/20	Oppo A91 Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3	172 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.40"	2400x1080
76 %	07/20	Nokia 5.3 SD 665, Adreno 610	185 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.55"	1600x720

Comparaison des tailles

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G Mali-G57 MP5, Dimensity 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	687 (642^min - 704^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	551 (465^min - 583^max) MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (5.59 - 1599, n=301, last 2 years)	439 MBit/s ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash	349 (339^min - 355^max) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Oppo A91 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	332 (312^min - 337^max) MBit/s ∼48% -52%
realme 6 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	290 (137^min - 336^max) MBit/s ∼42% -58%
Nokia 5.3 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	163 (25^min - 258^max) MBit/s ∼24% -76%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G Mali-G57 MP5, Dimensity 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	634 (495^min - 650^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	619 (283^min - 670^max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (15.5 - 1414, n=301, last 2 years)	436 MBit/s ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash	365 (349^min - 370^max) MBit/s ∼58% -42%
Oppo A91 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	294 (80^min - 338^max) MBit/s ∼46% -54%
realme 6 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	292 (145^min - 352^max) MBit/s ∼46% -54%
Nokia 5.3 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	145 (20^min - 215^max) MBit/s ∼23% -77%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø633 (495-650)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø687 (642-704)

Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G - Ultra-grand-angle.

Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G - Appareil photo principal.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Hauptkamera Low Light Hauptkamera Weitwinkel

Cliquer pour charger les images

Redmi 10x

OnePlus 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Canon EOS 600D

Cliquer pour charger les images

Redmi 10x

OnePlus 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Canon EOS 600D

Cliquer pour charger les images

Redmi 10x

OnePlus 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Canon EOS 600D

Cliquer pour charger les images

Redmi 10x

OnePlus 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Canon EOS 600D

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G: 7.11 ∆E min: 2.98 - max: 13.63 ∆E

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck.biz/Test-du-Xiaomi-Redmi-10X-5G-plus-rapide-qu-un-Samsung-Galaxy-S20-Ultra.496567.0.html">Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G</a> — Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G


598 cd/m²	601 cd/m²	605 cd/m²
599 cd/m²	608 cd/m²	611 cd/m²
608 cd/m²	620 cd/m²	622 cd/m²

Homogénéité de la luminosité

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 622 cd/m² Moyenne: 608 cd/m² Minimum: 3.44 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 96 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 608 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.99 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.291

	Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.57	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67	Samsung Galaxy A41 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.10	realme 6 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.60	Oppo A91 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40	Nokia 5.3 IPS, 1600x720, 6.55
Screen		24%	19%	-30%	-27%	-39%
Brightness middle	608	610 0%	554 -9%	442 -27%	594 -2%	523 -14%
Brightness	608	579 -5%	559 -8%	419 -31%	613 1%	482 -21%
Brightness Distribution	96	92 -4%	92 -4%	90 -6%	89 -7%	86 -10%
Black Level *		0.37		0.37		0.46
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	3.99	1.8 55%	2 50%	6.1 -53%	6.1 -53%	6.22 -56%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	11.65	3 74%	7.7 34%	9.7 17%	10.6 9%	10.56 9%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	3.3	2.5 24%	1.6 52%	5.9 -79%	7 -112%	8 -142%
Gamma	2.291 ^96%	2.31 ^95%	2.11 ^104%	2.35 ^94%	2.28 ^96%	2.226 ^99%
CCT	7023 ^93%	6864 ^95%	6589 ^99%	7631 ^85%	7370 ^88%	8856 ^73%
Contrast		1649		1195		1137

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé

227.3 Hz

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 227.3 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) .

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 227.3 Hz est relativement faible, les personnes les plus sensibles devraient percevoir un scintillement et être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire accrue (avec le niveau de luminosité indiqué)

En comparaison, 52 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 15315 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.

↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc
8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 5 ms hausse
8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 3 ms chute
L'écran montre de faibles temps de réponse, un bon écran pour jouer. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (23.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
10 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 5 ms hausse
10 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 5 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (37.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	652 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	569 Points ∼61% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	357 Points ∼38% -45%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	567 Points ∼60% -13%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	320 Points ∼34% -51%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	282 Points ∼30% -57%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	312 Points ∼33% -52%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	620 Points ∼66% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	742 Points ∼79% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	940 Points ∼100% +44%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	652 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 1604, n=248, last 2 years)	581 Points ∼62% -11%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	2678 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1771 Points ∼62% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1222 Points ∼43% -54%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	1759 Points ∼62% -34%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1475 Points ∼52% -45%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1430 Points ∼50% -47%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1350 Points ∼47% -50%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1854 Points ∼65% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2856 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	2787 Points ∼98% +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	2678 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (248 - 4455, n=248, last 2 years)	1991 Points ∼70% -26%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	2456 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	4789 Points ∼100% +95%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	2456 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (72 - 6524, n=143, last 2 years)	2197 Points ∼46% -11%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	3009 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	5532 Points ∼100% +84%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	3009 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (255 - 7514, n=146, last 2 years)	2269 Points ∼41% -25%

Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	3022 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1711 Points ∼34% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3523 Points ∼71% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	4965 Points ∼100% +64%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	3022 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (412 - 5192, n=67, last 2 years)	2634 Points ∼53% -13%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	10658 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	5097 Points ∼41% -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10999 Points ∼88% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	12561 Points ∼100% +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	10658 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1163 - 14895, n=67, last 2 years)	8061 Points ∼64% -24%
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	8214 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	4073 Points ∼50% -50%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7482 Points ∼91% -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	8214 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2166 - 12228, n=58, last 2 years)	6793 Points ∼83% -17%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	16302 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	9091 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	7594 Points ∼47% -53%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	13777 Points ∼85% -15%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8538 Points ∼52% -48%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	9955 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10985 Points ∼67% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	14551 Points ∼89% -11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	16302 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2689 - 19989, n=212, last 2 years)	10004 Points ∼61% -39%
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	11263 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	7829 Points ∼66% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	6742 Points ∼57% -40%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	10106 Points ∼86% -10%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	8185 Points ∼69% -27%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6775 Points ∼57% -40%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	8456 Points ∼72% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9035 Points ∼77% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	11784 Points ∼100% +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	11263 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=259, last 2 years)	7951 Points ∼67% -29%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	37153 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	38315 Points ∼57% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	20885 Points ∼31% -44%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	33926 Points ∼50% -9%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	23447 Points ∼35% -37%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24065 Points ∼36% -35%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	44531 Points ∼66% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	62225 Points ∼92% +67%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	67590 Points ∼100% +82%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	37153 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2920 - 117606, n=195, last 2 years)	40234 Points ∼60% +8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	38974 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	51789 Points ∼49% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	22232 Points ∼21% -43%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	53600 Points ∼50% +38%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	23159 Points ∼22% -41%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	15403 Points ∼14% -60%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	69645 Points ∼65% +79%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	106534 Points ∼100% +173%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	84533 Points ∼79% +117%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	38974 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2177 - 224130, n=195, last 2 years)	57625 Points ∼54% +48%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	32166 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	20054 Points ∼50% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	17231 Points ∼43% -46%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	14849 Points ∼37% -54%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	24514 Points ∼62% -24%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	20320 Points ∼51% -37%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	19658 Points ∼49% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25339 Points ∼64% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	39724 Points ∼100% +23%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	32166 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (8324 - 59268, n=195, last 2 years)	23272 Points ∼59% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	5267 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3534 Points ∼49% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1229 Points ∼17% -77%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3528 Points ∼49% -33%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1899 Points ∼27% -64%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1795 Points ∼25% -66%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4561 Points ∼64% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7166 Points ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	7152 Points ∼100% +36%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	5267 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 11256, n=257, last 2 years)	3474 Points ∼48% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	5996 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3620 Points ∼36% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1093 Points ∼11% -82%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3683 Points ∼37% -39%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1767 Points ∼18% -71%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1663 Points ∼17% -72%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5148 Points ∼52% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9963 Points ∼100% +66%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	9480 Points ∼95% +58%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	5996 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (54 - 16670, n=257, last 2 years)	4073 Points ∼41% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	3745 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3263 Points ∼85% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2181 Points ∼57% -42%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3076 Points ∼80% -18%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2568 Points ∼67% -31%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2482 Points ∼65% -34%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3259 Points ∼85% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3614 Points ∼94% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	3846 Points ∼100% +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	3745 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 5301, n=257, last 2 years)	2801 Points ∼73% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	5469 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3645 Points ∼49% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1630 Points ∼22% -70%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3651 Points ∼49% -33%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1885 Points ∼25% -66%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1810 Points ∼24% -67%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4621 Points ∼62% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7449 Points ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	7385 Points ∼99% +35%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	5469 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (149 - 11895, n=278, last 2 years)	4170 Points ∼56% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	5991 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3785 Points ∼37% -37%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1486 Points ∼14% -75%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3835 Points ∼37% -36%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1747 Points ∼17% -71%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1692 Points ∼16% -72%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5356 Points ∼52% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10291 Points ∼100% +72%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	9536 Points ∼93% +59%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	5991 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (122 - 22052, n=278, last 2 years)	5279 Points ∼51% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	4169 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3226 Points ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2466 Points ∼59% -41%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3125 Points ∼75% -25%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2606 Points ∼63% -37%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2396 Points ∼57% -43%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3099 Points ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3788 Points ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	4127 Points ∼99% -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	4169 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (620 - 5784, n=276, last 2 years)	2999 Points ∼72% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	4568 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2499 Points ∼38% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1160 Points ∼17% -75%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2514 Points ∼38% -45%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1276 Points ∼19% -72%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1152 Points ∼17% -75%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3301 Points ∼50% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5509 Points ∼83% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	6658 Points ∼100% +46%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	4568 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (78 - 9138, n=253, last 2 years)	2669 Points ∼40% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	4769 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2356 Points ∼29% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1016 Points ∼12% -79%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2388 Points ∼29% -50%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1117 Points ∼14% -77%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	999 Points ∼12% -79%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3259 Points ∼40% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6355 Points ∼78% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	8156 Points ∼100% +71%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	4769 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (62 - 11573, n=253, last 2 years)	2823 Points ∼35% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	3963 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3170 Points ∼78% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2296 Points ∼57% -42%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3083 Points ∼76% -22%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2550 Points ∼63% -36%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2476 Points ∼61% -38%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3395 Points ∼84% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3758 Points ∼93% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	4052 Points ∼100% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	3963 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (435 - 5318, n=253, last 2 years)	2835 Points ∼70% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	4497 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2667 Points ∼39% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1179 Points ∼17% -74%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2656 Points ∼39% -41%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1265 Points ∼19% -72%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1148 Points ∼17% -74%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3501 Points ∼51% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5913 Points ∼87% +31%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	6830 Points ∼100% +52%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	4497 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 9839, n=277, last 2 years)	3386 Points ∼50% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	4798 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2539 Points ∼31% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1028 Points ∼12% -79%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2558 Points ∼31% -47%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1102 Points ∼13% -77%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	999 Points ∼12% -79%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3569 Points ∼43% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7076 Points ∼86% +47%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	8239 Points ∼100% +72%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	4798 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (73 - 12914, n=277, last 2 years)	3823 Points ∼46% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	3969 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3236 Points ∼76% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2427 Points ∼57% -39%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3067 Points ∼72% -23%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2621 Points ∼61% -34%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2409 Points ∼56% -39%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3301 Points ∼77% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3754 Points ∼88% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	4273 Points ∼100% +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	3969 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (620 - 5793, n=277, last 2 years)	3045 Points ∼71% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	4069 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2340 Points ∼45% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1148 Points ∼22% -72%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2317 Points ∼45% -43%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1248 Points ∼24% -69%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1140 Points ∼22% -72%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3065 Points ∼59% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4914 Points ∼95% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	5178 Points ∼100% +27%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	4069 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (426 - 6977, n=214, last 2 years)	2638 Points ∼51% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	4427 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2250 Points ∼35% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1005 Points ∼16% -77%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2255 Points ∼35% -49%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1103 Points ∼17% -75%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	995 Points ∼16% -78%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3147 Points ∼49% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5723 Points ∼90% +29%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	6378 Points ∼100% +44%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	4427 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (349 - 11259, n=214, last 2 years)	2958 Points ∼46% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	3168 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2721 Points ∼83% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2281 Points ∼69% -28%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2562 Points ∼78% -19%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2304 Points ∼70% -27%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2321 Points ∼71% -27%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	2756 Points ∼84% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3288 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	3122 Points ∼95% -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	3168 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1786 - 4061, n=214, last 2 years)	2649 Points ∼81% -16%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	60 fps ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps ∼55% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	37 fps ∼34% -38%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	60 fps ∼55% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	61 fps ∼55% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps ∼55% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	110 fps ∼100% +83%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	60 fps ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (8.2 - 143, n=218, last 2 years)	59.6 fps ∼54% -1%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	115 fps ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	85 fps ∼51% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	39 fps ∼23% -66%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	85 fps ∼51% -26%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	94 fps ∼56% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps ∼100% +45%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	145 fps ∼87% +26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	115 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.3 - 319, n=218, last 2 years)	108 fps ∼65% -6%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	57 fps ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	39 fps ∼43% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	20 fps ∼22% -65%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	38 fps ∼42% -33%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	50 fps ∼56% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps ∼67% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	90 fps ∼100% +58%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	57 fps ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.5 - 120, n=216, last 2 years)	47.1 fps ∼52% -17%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	71 fps ∼71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps ∼41% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	21 fps ∼21% -70%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	41 fps ∼41% -42%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	56 fps ∼56% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps ∼100% +41%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	96 fps ∼96% +35%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	71 fps ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 180, n=217, last 2 years)	63.5 fps ∼64% -11%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	44 fps ∼72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	29 fps ∼48% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	13 fps ∼21% -70%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	27 fps ∼44% -39%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	34 fps ∼56% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	58 fps ∼95% +32%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	61 fps ∼100% +39%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	44 fps ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 106, n=215, last 2 years)	36.7 fps ∼60% -17%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	52 fps ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps ∼43% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	13 fps ∼19% -75%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	30 fps ∼43% -42%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	38 fps ∼55% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	69 fps ∼100% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	65 fps ∼94% +25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	52 fps ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 121, n=215, last 2 years)	43.6 fps ∼63% -16%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	25 fps ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps ∼45% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	7.7 fps ∼20% -69%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	16 fps ∼42% -36%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	19 fps ∼50% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps ∼100% +52%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	34 fps ∼89% +36%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	25 fps ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 61, n=214, last 2 years)	22.8 fps ∼60% -9%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	29 fps ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps ∼43% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	8.1 fps ∼19% -72%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	18 fps ∼43% -38%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21 fps ∼50% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps ∼100% +45%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	38 fps ∼90% +31%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	29 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.8 - 75, n=214, last 2 years)	26.2 fps ∼62% -10%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	29 fps ∼59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps ∼35% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	7.5 fps ∼15% -74%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	17 fps ∼35% -41%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	7.5 fps ∼15% -74%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	14 fps ∼29% -52%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21 fps ∼43% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps ∼76% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	49 fps ∼100% +69%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	29 fps ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.5 - 73, n=283, last 2 years)	23.1 fps ∼47% -20%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	32 fps ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps ∼42% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	7.5 fps ∼17% -77%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	19 fps ∼44% -41%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	8.8 fps ∼20% -72%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.3 fps ∼19% -74%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	24 fps ∼56% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps ∼95% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	43 fps ∼100% +34%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	32 fps ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.95 - 257, n=282, last 2 years)	26.6 fps ∼62% -17%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	18 fps ∼53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps ∼32% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	4.9 fps ∼14% -73%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	11 fps ∼32% -39%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	4.5 fps ∼13% -75%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.8 fps ∼26% -51%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	13 fps ∼38% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps ∼71% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	34 fps ∼100% +89%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	18 fps ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=283, last 2 years)	15.2 fps ∼45% -16%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	12 fps ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6.9 fps ∼31% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2.8 fps ∼13% -77%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	7 fps ∼32% -42%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2.9 fps ∼13% -76%
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps ∼13% -77%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	8.5 fps ∼39% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps ∼73% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	22 fps ∼100% +83%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	12 fps ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.35 - 101, n=283, last 2 years)	10.4 fps ∼47% -13%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	401419 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	271934 Points ∼52% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	157473 Points ∼30% -61%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	275464 Points ∼52% -31%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	326795 Points ∼62% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	440822 Points ∼84% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	527820 Points ∼100% +31%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	401419 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (53335 - 727247, n=195, last 2 years)	337174 Points ∼64% -16%

VRMark - Amber Room (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	4420 Score ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1164 Score ∼23% -74%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4964 Score ∼100% +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	4420 Score ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (421 - 7649, n=56, last 2 years)	3184 Score ∼64% -28%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	3636 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3444 Points ∼72% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1901 Points ∼40% -48%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3481 Points ∼73% -4%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3931 Points ∼82% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4595 Points ∼96% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	4791 Points ∼100% +32%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	3636 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (323 - 7123, n=204, last 2 years)	3730 Points ∼78% +3%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	7258 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6856 Points ∼76% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	5142 Points ∼57% -29%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	6908 Points ∼77% -5%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	6685 Points ∼74% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8441 Points ∼94% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	9024 Points ∼100% +24%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	7258 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1160 - 11774, n=204, last 2 years)	6806 Points ∼75% -6%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	3996 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	4452 Points ∼92% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2148 Points ∼44% -46%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	4573 Points ∼94% +14%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4856 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4031 Points ∼83% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	3811 Points ∼78% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	3996 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (522 - 9044, n=204, last 2 years)	4385 Points ∼90% +10%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	4264 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3757 Points ∼35% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1113 Points ∼10% -74%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3768 Points ∼35% -12%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5216 Points ∼49% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9270 Points ∼87% +117%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	10646 Points ∼100% +150%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	4264 Points ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (349 - 15739, n=204, last 2 years)	5828 Points ∼55% +37%
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192	1407 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1226 Points ∼85% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1062 Points ∼74% -25%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	1233 Points ∼86% -12%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1412 Points ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1378 Points ∼96% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	1439 Points ∼100% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	1407 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2169, n=204, last 2 years)	1282 Points ∼89% -9%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=186, last 2 years)	50.2 Points ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	47.901 Points ∼95% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	45 Points ∼90% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)	44.974 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)	32.643 Points ∼65% -27%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=198, last 2 years)	90.3 Points ∼100% +4%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	89.577 Points ∼99% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	86.75 Points ∼96% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)	86.647 Points ∼96%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	86.6 Points ∼96% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)	55.972 Points ∼62% -35%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=171, last 2 years)	49 runs/min ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)	47.6 runs/min ∼97%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	47.6 runs/min ∼97% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	45.2 runs/min ∼92% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)	27.8 runs/min ∼57% -42%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=205, last 2 years)	78.2 Points ∼100% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	71 Points ∼91% +9%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	67 Points ∼86% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)	65 Points ∼83%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	65 Points ∼83% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)	52 Points ∼66% -20%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)	18974 Points ∼100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	18974 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=213, last 2 years)	17842 Points ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	17265 Points ∼91% -9%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	17157 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)	10499 Points ∼55% -45%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=215, last 2 years)	3894 ms * ∼100% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)	3778.9 ms * ∼97% -25%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	3033.1 ms * ∼78% -0%
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)	3032.1 ms * ∼78%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820	3032 ms * ∼78% -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	2850.1 ms * ∼73% +6%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

	Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro	Samsung Galaxy A41	realme 6 Pro	Oppo A91	Nokia 5.3	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-41%	-44%	-31%	-43%	-45%	-31%	-28%
Sequential Read 256KB	999.36	498.15 -50%	299.89 -70%	512.61 -49%	505.44 -49%	299.5 -70%	770 (427 - 999, n=88) -23%	787 (41.9 - 2037, n=291, last 2 years) -21%
Sequential Write 256KB	479.45	171.09 -64%	211.05 -56%	203.28 -58%	185.26 -61%	243.2 -49%	264 (13.6 - 707, n=88) -45%	350 (11.9 - 1321, n=291, last 2 years) -27%
Random Read 4KB	239.4	122.58 -49%	84 -65%	158.66 -34%	145.64 -39%	109.1 -54%	147 (92.6 - 239, n=88) -39%	140 (13.5 - 325, n=291, last 2 years) -42%
Random Write 4KB	289.64	112.93 -61%	72.53 -75%	154 -47%	28.55 -90%	45.2 -84%	122 (18.2 - 290, n=88) -58%	126 (5.2 - 330, n=291, last 2 years) -56%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	84.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	76.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -9%	83.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	86.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	77.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -9%	77.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -8%	76 (13.4 - 88.3, n=43) -10%	76.2 (13.4 - 154, n=164, last 2 years) -10%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	64.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	54.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -15%	67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%	63.43 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	60.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -7%	60.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -6%	59.6 (8.4 - 72.4, n=43) -8%	58.5 (8.4 - 83.3, n=164, last 2 years) -9%

PUBG mobile

; Smooth: Ø59.9 (58-61)

; Balanced: Ø40 (39-41)

; HD: Ø40 (39-41)

Dead Trigger 2

: Ø60.3 (59-61)

: Ø29.8 (25-31)

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge


43.5 °C	41.3 °C	37.4 °C
42.6 °C	41 °C	37.4 °C
41.3 °C	39.7 °C	37.7 °C

Maximum: 43.5 °C
Moyenne: 40.2 °C


32.8 °C	39.2 °C	40.7 °C
33.7 °C	39.2 °C	40 °C
34.2 °C	39 °C	39.5 °C

Maximum: 40.7 °C
Moyenne: 37.6 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 42.5 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A41 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique

Éteint/en veille	0.2 / 0.3 Watts
Au repos	1.6 / 1.9 / 2.1 Watts