Courte critique de l'Eurocom Nightsky RX15 (i9-9980HK, RTX 2070, 4K OLED, Clevo PB51RF)

Name: Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Brand: Eurocom

Core i9 non bridé et OLED. Le Nightsky RX15 est l’un des rares portables de 15,6 pouces aux bordures d’écran étroites proposant un Core i9-9980HK non bridé. Et sa version avec écran OLED rend le système compétitif face aux Razer Blade 15, Alienware m15 et Gigabyte Aero 15 qui possèdent également une version OLED.

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduit par Prévots), 08/29/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

Exemplaire de test fourni par Eurocom

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Eurocom Sky X4C MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 Eurocom Nightsky RX15 HP Omen 15-dc1303ng HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Eurocom Sky X4C (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	193.6 MB/s ∼100% +3%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	187.9 MB/s ∼97%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	78.4 MB/s ∼40% -58%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	74.1 MB/s ∼38% -61%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	26 MB/s ∼13% -86%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	207.3 MB/s ∼100%
Eurocom Sky X4C (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	206.3 MB/s ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	85.3 MB/s ∼41% -59%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	77.6 MB/s ∼37% -63%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	32 MB/s ∼15% -85%

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	720 MBit/s ∼100%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	692 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	638 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
Eurocom Sky X4C Intel Wireless-AC 9260	611 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	601 (562^min - 639^max) MBit/s ∼83% -17%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	691 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	688 MBit/s ∼100%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	666 (597^min - 686^max) MBit/s ∼96% -3%
Eurocom Sky X4C Intel Wireless-AC 9260	662 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	614 MBit/s ∼89% -11%


390 cd/m²	417.8 cd/m²	419.3 cd/m²
377.3 cd/m²	414.9 cd/m²	411.6 cd/m²
371.8 cd/m²	420.7 cd/m²	415.1 cd/m²

Homogénéité de la luminosité

Samsung SDCA029

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 420.7 cd/m² (Nits) Moyenne: 404.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.71 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 88 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 414.9 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.58 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.05% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.93% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.05

Download Profil ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 15.60, 3840x2160	Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 AU Optronics B156HAN, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Eurocom Sky X4C ID: SHP142A, Name: LQ156D1JX01B, IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160	Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, OLED, 15.60, 3840x2160	HP Omen 15-dc1303ng LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 CMN N156HHE-GA1 (CMN15F4), TN, 15.60, 1920x1080
Display		-26%	-23%	-6%	-26%	-8%
Display P3 Coverage	99.93	65.21 -35%	65.07 -35%	88.11 -12%	63.85 -36%	90.04 -10%
sRGB Coverage	100	90.94 -9%	96.52 -3%	99.6 0%	93.36 -7%	99.97 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	99.05	66.25 -33%	67.15 -32%	91.76 -7%	64.98 -34%	85.97 -13%
Response Times		-385%	-299%	4%	-403%	13778%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)	14.4 ?(7.2, 7.2) -500%	33.6 ?(19.6, 14) -1300%	2.3 ?(1.1, 1.2) 4%	14 ?(7, 7) -483%	24.4 ?(14.4, 10) -917%
Response Time Black / White *	2.6 ?(1.3, 1.3)	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) -269%	33.2 ?(21.2, 12) -1177%	2.4 ?(1.1, 1.3) 8%	11 ?(7, 4) -323%	15.8 ?(13.8, 2) -508%
PWM Frequency	59.52 ?(100)		1000 ?(20) 1580%	59.52 ?(100) 0%		25510 ?(19) 42760%
Screen		-3%	-13%	6%	6%	-11%
Brightness middle	414.9	331 -20%	324.7 -22%	421.2 2%	316 -24%	292 -30%
Brightness	404	327 -19%	318 -21%	417 3%	295 -27%	258 -36%
Brightness Distribution	88	83 -6%	81 -8%	94 7%	84 -5%	81 -8%
Black Level *		0.35	0.26		0.42	0.23
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	7.58	4.22 44%	4.67 38%	6.06 20%	2.7 64%	5.82 23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	14.85	6.95 53%	8.16 45%	11.89 20%	5.65 62%	9.05 39%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.9	3.9 -34%	5.9 -103%	2.8 3%	2.35 19%	4.61 -59%
Gamma	2.05 ^107%	2.26 ^97%	2.14 ^103%	2.15 ^102%	2.41 ^91%	2.65 ^83%
CCT	6538 ^99%	7392 ^88%	7176 ^91%	6235 ^104%	6904 ^94%	6950 ^94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	88.2	59 -33%	61.1 -31%	81 -8%	60 -32%	76 -14%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	100	90.5 -9%	96.1 -4%	99.6 0%	93 -7%	100 0%
Contrast		946	1249		752	1270
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *		3.27			1.58	2.82
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)		-138% / -67%	-112% / -77%	1% / 3%	-141% / -64%	4586% / 2945%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.

↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc
2.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 1.3 ms hausse
2.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 1.3 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (23.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
2.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 1.2 ms hausse
2.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 1.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (37.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé

59.52 Hz

≤ 100 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 59.52 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 100 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 59.52 Hz est extrêmement faible, de grands risques de fatigue oculaire accrue et de maux de tête en cas d'utilisation prolongée.

En comparaison, 52 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 20903 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 3846000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Eurocom Nightsky RX15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1490 (1469.51-1815.95)

Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1314 (1090.6-1600.38)

MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1619 (1602.44-1728.31)

Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1123 (1106.07-1188.78)

Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1072 (1059.41-1260.12)

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R20

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen 9 3900X	209 Points ∼73% +3%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing Intel Core i7-9700K	203 Points ∼71% 0%
Medion Erazer X15805 Intel Core i9-8950HK	203 Points ∼71% 0%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	202 Points ∼71%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK (181 - 215, n=13)	199 Points ∼70% -1%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	189 Points ∼66% -6%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	171 Points ∼60% -15%
Schenker Key 16 Intel Core i7-8750H	171 Points ∼60% -15%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Intel Core i7-9750H	171 Points ∼60% -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen 9 3900X	3049 Points ∼31% +67%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	1821 Points ∼19%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	1721 Points ∼18% -5%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK (1327 - 1930, n=14)	1656 Points ∼17% -9%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing Intel Core i7-9700K	1465 Points ∼15% -20%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Intel Core i7-9750H	1288 Points ∼13% -29%
Medion Erazer X15805 Intel Core i9-8950HK	1217 Points ∼13% -33%
Schenker Key 16 Intel Core i7-8750H	1116 Points ∼11% -39%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	769 Points ∼8% -58%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen 9 3900X	514 Points ∼63% +7%
Medion Erazer X15805 Intel Core i9-8950HK	498 Points ∼61% +4%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	479 Points ∼59%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK (431 - 505, n=10)	471 Points ∼58% -2%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	441 Points ∼54% -8%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	419 Points ∼52% -13%
Schenker Key 16 Intel Core i7-8750H	416 Points ∼51% -13%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Intel Core i7-9750H	416 Points ∼51% -13%
CPU (Multi Core)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen 9 3900X	6910 Points ∼29% +82%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	3795 Points ∼16%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	3712 Points ∼16% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK (2974 - 4150, n=10)	3530 Points ∼15% -7%
Medion Erazer X15805 Intel Core i9-8950HK	2924 Points ∼12% -23%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Intel Core i7-9750H	2622 Points ∼11% -31%
Schenker Key 16 Intel Core i7-8750H	2333 Points ∼10% -39%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	1723 Points ∼7% -55%

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

3561

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

45527

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

7877

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

202 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1821 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

152.19 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Aide

... en comparaison

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Eurocom Sky X4C GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe	6620 Points ∼75% +5%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	6283 Points ∼72%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5839 Points ∼67% -7%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	5814 Points ∼66% -7%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	5583 Points ∼64% -11%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	5469 Points ∼62% -13%
Essentials
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	10098 Points ∼88% +6%
Eurocom Sky X4C GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe	10064 Points ∼87% +6%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	9701 Points ∼84% +2%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	9518 Points ∼83%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	9450 Points ∼82% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	9109 Points ∼79% -4%
Productivity
Eurocom Sky X4C GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe	8745 Points ∼78% +7%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	8209 Points ∼74%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	8200 Points ∼73% 0%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	7687 Points ∼69% -6%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	7671 Points ∼69% -7%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	7494 Points ∼67% -9%
Digital Content Creation
Eurocom Sky X4C GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe	8949 Points ∼58% +4%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	8617 Points ∼55%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	7236 Points ∼47% -16%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	6886 Points ∼44% -20%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	6502 Points ∼42% -25%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	6110 Points ∼39% -29%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Sky X4C GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe	5225 Points ∼83% +39%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4380 Points ∼70% +17%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	4362 Points ∼69% +16%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	4271 Points ∼68% +14%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	4240 Points ∼68% +13%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	3799 Points ∼61% +1%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	3758 Points ∼60%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5749 Points ∼81% +23%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	5608 Points ∼79% +20%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	5497 Points ∼77% +18%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	5210 Points ∼73% +11%
Eurocom Sky X4C GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe	5181 Points ∼73% +11%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	4762 Points ∼67% +2%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	4677 Points ∼66%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3758 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4677 points
PCMark 10 Score		6283 points
Aide

	Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	Eurocom Sky X4C Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
AS SSD		13%	6%	-44%	8%
Seq Read	2352.01	2541.23 8%	1832.18 -22%	512.05 -78%	1723.09 -27%
Seq Write	2184.22	1988.74 -9%	1864.07 -15%	462.8 -79%	1386.27 -37%
4K Read	28.65	44.83 56%	52.08 82%	32.36 13%	43.25 51%
4K Write	61.3	129.64 111%	108.34 77%	68.58 12%	98.3 60%
4K-64 Read	1317.13	1645.75 25%	1159.06 -12%	348.58 -74%	1077.98 -18%
4K-64 Write	2155.64	1374.74 -36%	1807.21 -16%	294.33 -86%	1456.13 -32%
Access Time Read *	0.101	0.032 68%	0.05 50%	0.101 -0%	0.05 50%
Access Time Write *	0.09	0.03 67%	0.034 62%	0.051 43%	0.039 57%
Score Read	1581	1945 23%	1394 -12%	432 -73%	1294 -18%
Score Write	2435	1703 -30%	2102 -14%	409 -83%	1693 -30%
Score Total	4813	4615 -4%	4221 -12%	1071 -78%	3638 -24%
Copy ISO MB/s	2704.82	1908.08 -29%	2082.66 -23%		3182.39 18%
Copy Program MB/s	665.8	467.16 -30%	496.53 -25%		983.98 48%
Copy Game MB/s	1582.57	1054.98 -33%	976.6 -38%		1823.85 15%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3539 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2324 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 593.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 482.5 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1932 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1938 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 60.54 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 153 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	24623 Points ∼49% +21%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X	23373 Points ∼46% +14%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, R9 3900X	22350 Points ∼44% +9%
Eurocom Sky X4C NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700K	20909 Points ∼41% +2%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K	20759 Points ∼41% +2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	20718 Points ∼41% +1%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	20434 Points ∼40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (18169 - 21138, n=19)	20123 Points ∼40% -2%
Alienware m15 P79F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	18443 Points ∼36% -10%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	17720 Points ∼35% -13%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	15343 Points ∼30% -25%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H	12903 Points ∼26% -37%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK	8532 Points ∼17% -58%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	9754 Points ∼49% +26%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X	9364 Points ∼47% +21%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	7840 Points ∼40% +1%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K	7815 Points ∼40% +1%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	7754 Points ∼39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (7006 - 8028, n=18)	7651 Points ∼39% -1%
Alienware m15 P79F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	7105 Points ∼36% -8%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, R9 3900X	7089 Points ∼36% -9%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	5699 Points ∼29% -27%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H	4925 Points ∼25% -36%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK	3353 Points ∼17% -57%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	5538 Points ∼42% +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (3958 - 4627, n=13)	4294 Points ∼33% +1%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	4265 Points ∼33%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K	4155 Points ∼32% -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	4032 Points ∼31% -5%
Alienware m15 P79F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	3896 Points ∼30% -9%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H	1294 Points ∼10% -70%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	34050 Points ∼56% +28%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X	31595 Points ∼52% +19%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, R9 3900X	31252 Points ∼51% +18%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	27762 Points ∼45% +4%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K	26975 Points ∼44% +1%
Eurocom Sky X4C NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700K	26912 Points ∼44% +1%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	26582 Points ∼43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (23335 - 27298, n=21)	25775 Points ∼42% -3%
Alienware m15 P79F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	23819 Points ∼39% -10%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	23061 Points ∼38% -13%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	20784 Points ∼34% -22%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H	17264 Points ∼28% -35%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK	12388 Points ∼20% -53%
1280x720 Performance Combined
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, R9 3900X	16551 Points ∼62% +2%
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	16523 Points ∼62% +2%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	16253 Points ∼61%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K	15617 Points ∼59% -4%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X	13950 Points ∼52% -14%
Eurocom Sky X4C NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700K	13928 Points ∼52% -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (8716 - 16364, n=21)	12534 Points ∼47% -23%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	12460 Points ∼47% -23%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H	12431 Points ∼47% -24%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	12421 Points ∼47% -24%
Alienware m15 P79F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	11573 Points ∼43% -29%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	11168 Points ∼42% -31%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK	8801 Points ∼33% -46%

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark 11 Performance		23371 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		40808 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		18283 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		7968 points
Aide

... en comparaison

The Witcher 3 | Shadow of the Tomb Raider

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	95.3 fps ∼100% +18%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop)	87 (72^min - 100^max) fps ∼91% +8%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	80.6 fps ∼85%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	77.6 fps ∼81% -4%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64	76 (67^min - 84^max) fps ∼80% -6%
Eurocom Sky X4C Intel Core i7-8700K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	75.3 fps ∼79% -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (64 - 82.1, n=21)	74.3 fps ∼78% -8%
Alienware m15 P79F Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	64.4 fps ∼68% -20%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	60.6 fps ∼64% -25%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	60.5 fps ∼63% -25%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	53.1 fps ∼56% -34%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	36 fps ∼38% -55%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	109 fps ∼100% +12%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop)	101 fps ∼93% +4%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	97 fps ∼89%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	94 fps ∼86% -3%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64	91 fps ∼83% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (74.2 - 97, n=11)	88.7 fps ∼81% -9%
Alienware m15 P79F Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	84 fps ∼77% -13%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	73 fps ∼67% -25%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	34 fps ∼31% -65%

The Witcher 3 | Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Eurocom Nightsky RX15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB; FPS: Ø71.4 (65-79)

	Bas	Moyen	Élevé	Ultra	4K
BioShock Infinite (2013)	391.4	345.6	320.2	181.3		fps
The Witcher 3 (2015)	329.3	244.8	155.8	80.6	57.4	fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	160	114	107	97	34	fps

	Eurocom Nightsky RX15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	Eurocom Sky X4C GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe	HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
Noise		4%	-2%	11%	-5%	3%	7%
off / environment *	28.2	28.6 -1%	30.5 -8%	28.3 -0%	30 -6%	28.4 -1%	28.2 -0%
Idle Minimum *	28.2	28.6 -1%	32.8 -16%	28.8 -2%	30 -6%	28.6 -1%	28.2 -0%
Idle Average *	28.2	28.6 -1%	32.8 -16%	28.8 -2%	35 -24%	28.6 -1%	28.2 -0%
Idle Maximum *	31.7	31.1 2%	32.8 -3%	29 9%	36 -14%	28.6 10%	30.4 4%
Load Average *	53.7	42.2 21%	42.5 21%	33.5 38%	42 22%	47.8 11%	43.8 18%
Witcher 3 ultra *	53.7	53.8 -0%		45 16%	54 -1%	53.7 -0%	47.2 12%
Load Maximum *	53.7	50 7%	47.5 12%	45.2 16%	56 -4%	53.7 -0%	47.2 12%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos		28.2 / 28.2 / 31.7 dB(A)
Disque dur		0 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité		53.7 / 53.7 dB(A)

	30 dB silencieux 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) bruyant
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge

Witcher 3


39.2 °C	39.4 °C	34.2 °C
35 °C	40.2 °C	39.4 °C
27.4 °C	29.4 °C	28.8 °C

Maximum: 40.2 °C
Moyenne: 34.8 °C


37.8 °C	39.4 °C	35.8 °C
41.2 °C	53 °C	38.4 °C
28.2 °C	30 °C	26.8 °C

Maximum: 53 °C
Moyenne: 36.7 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 49 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.8 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge

Witcher 3


31 °C	32 °C	31.4 °C
30.8 °C	31.8 °C	34.2 °C
27.6 °C	29.4 °C	27.6 °C

Maximum: 34.2 °C
Moyenne: 30.6 °C


33.2 °C	33.6 °C	33.6 °C
39.6 °C	35.6 °C	36.8 °C
30 °C	37.2 °C	29.6 °C

Maximum: 39.6 °C
Moyenne: 34.4 °C

Température ambiante de la pièce 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge

Witcher 3


38 °C	38.4 °C	37.8 °C
35.2 °C	41 °C	41.2 °C
27 °C	26.8 °C	28.4 °C

Maximum: 41.2 °C
Moyenne: 34.9 °C


36.8 °C	38.6 °C	38.6 °C
41.8 °C	39 °C	38.6 °C
27.6 °C	30.8 °C	27.6 °C

Maximum: 41.8 °C
Moyenne: 35.5 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 50 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22.2 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 40.2 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.7 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.7 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-0.4 °C / -0.7 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Eurocom Nightsky RX15 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.56 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique

Éteint/en veille	0.4 / 1.7 Watts
Au repos	12.6 / 21.4 / 34.4 Watts
Fortement sollicité	123.2 / 246.6 Watts


Légende: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Eurocom Nightsky RX15 i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60	Eurocom Sky X4C i7-8700K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, TN, 1920x1080, 15.60	Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption		-33%	21%	24%	3%	-32%
Idle Minimum *	12.6	30.2 -140%	12.5 1%	9 29%	16.8 -33%	29 -130%
Idle Average *	21.4	34.7 -62%	15.3 29%	14 35%	29 -36%	32 -50%
Idle Maximum *	34.4	37.8 -10%	20.7 40%	19 45%	30.8 10%	37 -8%
Load Average *	123.2	130.3 -6%	90.2 27%	91 26%	89.2 28%	157 -27%
Witcher 3 ultra *	192.4	172.2 10%	162 16%	182 5%	141.1 27%	173 10%
Load Maximum *	246.6	217.7 12%	209.3 15%	238 3%	192.3 22%	217 12%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie

WiFi Websurfing

3h 26min

	Eurocom Nightsky RX15 i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh	Eurocom Sky X4C i7-8700K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 82 Wh	HP Omen 15-dc1303ng i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 Wh	MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 51 Wh	Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh	Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 97 Wh
Autonomie de la batterie		-24%	-4%	91%	17%	4%	127%
Reader / Idle		182	301	953	340		910
WiFi v1.3	206	156 -24%	197 -4%	393 91%	240 17%	214 4%	467 127%
Load		81	69	102	46		199

Points positifs

+ version Core i9-9980HK peu commune

+ marge de chauffe pour l'overclocking du processeur

+ rétroéclairage RVB par touche

+ niveau de noir parfait

+ espace colorimétrique DCI-P3

+ batterie amovible

Points négatifs

- glisse de l'écran tactile

- pas de version GeForce RTX 2080

- maintenance difficile

- bruyant en jeu

- bloatware

Beaucoup de nos conclusions à propos du Nightsky Ti15 s’appliquent toujours pour le Nightsky RX15, incluant la maintenance difficile, l’excellent retour du clavier, l’autonomie moyenne, les excellentes performances, et les ventilateurs bruyants en jeu. Deux autres questions nous intéressent plus : est-ce que le Core i9 et l’OLED valent le coup par rapport au Core i7 et à l’IPS de la version de base ?

La version la plus adaptée dépendra de l’usage de l’utilisateur. Si l’on pense utiliser le Nightsky RX15 avant tout pour jouer en 60 IPS, alors le Core i7 avec écran IPS ou OLED fera l’affaire. Mais ceux qui visent plus de 60 IPS auront besoin de la puissance supplémentaire du Core i9, et du taux de rafraîchissement natif plus élevé des dalles IPS 144 ou 240 Hz. Pour un usage mixte avec des sollicitations professionnelles élevées, du montage vidéo et du jeu, le Core i9 avec écran OLED serait l’idéal. C’est juste dommage que la maintenance soit plus complexe que nécessaire pour une telle offre.

L’OLED offre des couleurs et des noirs notablement plus profonds, moins de ghosting, une densité de pixels plus élevée, une image plus lumineuse et plus nette que les alternatives IPS 144 ou 240 Hz. Pour les joueurs invétérés qui veulent avant tout avoir des taux d’image élevés, l’écran IPS reste la meilleure option.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Eurocom Nightsky RX15 - 2019-08-27 08/27/2019 v6^(old)
Allen Ngo

Châssis

73 / 98 → 74%

Clavier

88%

Dispositif de pointage

78%

Connectivité

72 / 81 → 89%

Poids

60 / 10-66 → 89%

Autonomie

72%

Écran

84%

Performances en jeu

100%

Performances dans les applications

95%

Chauffe

87 / 95 → 92%

Nuisance sonore

70 / 90 → 78%

Audio

60%

Appareil photo

50 / 85 → 59%

Moyenne

76%

86%

Gaming - Moyenne compensée

Linked Articles

Eurocom Nightsky RX15 (Nightsky Gamme)

Critique

•

Test de l'Eurocom Nightsky ARX...

Critique

•

Courte critique de l'Eurocom N...

Critique

•

Courte critique du PC portable...

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 4744 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!