Notebookcheck

Courte critique du Blackview A60 Pro : un smartphone convaincant

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduit par Prévots), 08/20/2019

Design moderne à bas prix. Si vous cherchez un smartphone à moins de 100 € avec de bonnes performances, un design moderne, le LTE, et un lecteur d’empreintes digitales, alors le Blackview A60 Pro pourrait être l’appareil rêvé pour vous. Lisez ce rapport de test pour voir si Blackview a bien fait les choses, et dans quels domaines l’A60 Pro est à la traîne.

Blackview A60 Pro (A Gamme)
Processeur
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
Carte graphique
PowerVR GE8300
Mémoire
3072 Mo 
Écran
6.1 pouces 19.6:9, 1280 x 600 pixel 232 PPP, IPS, brillant: oui
Disque dur
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 Go 
, 11 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD jusqu'à 256 Go, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, capteur de proximité
Réseau
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G : 850, 900, 1 800, 1 900. 3G : B1, B8. 4G : B1, B3, B7, B8, B20, B40., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 9.8 x 156.8 x 74
Batterie
4080 mAh Lithium-Ion
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 8 MPix autofocus à détection de contraste, flash LED, vidéos jusqu'à 1080p. Capteur secondaire 0,3 MP, profondeur de champ
Appareil photo secondaire: 5 MPix
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono à l'arrière, Clavier: virtuel, chargeur, câble USB, coque en silicone, radio FM, notification LED, vitesse LTE : 300 MBit/s en réception, 150 MBit/s en envoi, fanless
Poids
170 g, Alimentation: 49 g
Prix
89 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Blackview A60 Pro
Blackview A60 Pro
Blackview A60 Pro
Blackview A60 Pro
Blackview A60 Pro
Blackview A60 Pro

Comparaison des tailles

156.8 mm 74 mm 9.8 mm 170 g152.4 mm 73 mm 7.8 mm 150 g150.3 mm 72 mm 8.8 mm 175 g148 mm 72 mm 9.1 mm 172 g146.3 mm 70.4 mm 9.6 mm 165 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=424)
223 MBit/s ∼100% +301%
Cubot J3 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
61 (min: 44, max: 62) MBit/s ∼27% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Adreno 505, 439, 16 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 52, max: 64) MBit/s ∼27% +8%
Blackview A60 Pro
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.6 (min: 45, max: 56) MBit/s ∼25%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45 MBit/s ∼20% -19%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
12.5 MBit/s ∼6% -78%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=424)
213 MBit/s ∼100% +311%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Adreno 505, 439, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.8 (min: 25, max: 57) MBit/s ∼25% +4%
Cubot J3 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.3 (min: 49, max: 59) MBit/s ∼25% +3%
Blackview A60 Pro
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.8 (min: 18, max: 59) MBit/s ∼24%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s ∼22% -10%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
14.6 MBit/s ∼7% -72%
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : virages.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : virages.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : pont.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : pont.
GPS Blackview A60 Pro : vue générale.
GPS Blackview A60 Pro : vue générale.
GPS Blackview A60 Pro : virages.
GPS Blackview A60 Pro : virages.
GPS Blackview A60 Pro : pont.
GPS Blackview A60 Pro : pont.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Blackview A60 Pro - Détail de la mire de test.
Blackview A60 Pro - ColorChecker Passport : la couleur de référence se situe dans la partie inférieure de chaque bloc.
490
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 492 cd/m² Moyenne: 465 cd/m² Minimum: 23.2 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 89 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 472 cd/m²
Contraste: 2145:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.02 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
88.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.034
Blackview A60 Pro
IPS, 1280x600, 6.1
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Honor 7A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Cubot J3 Pro
IPS, 960x480, 5.5
Wiko Jerry 3
IPS, 960x480, 5.45
Screen
-46%
-15%
-90%
-64%
Brightness middle
472
533
13%
417
-12%
476
1%
370
-22%
Brightness
465
506
9%
395
-15%
459
-1%
367
-21%
Brightness Distribution
89
88
-1%
88
-1%
88
-1%
90
1%
Black Level *
0.22
0.6
-173%
0.18
18%
0.75
-241%
0.4
-82%
Contrast
2145
888
-59%
2317
8%
635
-70%
925
-57%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.02
5.6
-12%
6.46
-29%
8.14
-62%
8.58
-71%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.17
11.4
-40%
10.72
-31%
16.68
-104%
16.5
-102%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.6
7.4
-106%
5.8
-61%
12.2
-239%
9.3
-158%
Gamma
2.034 108%
2.212 99%
2.423 91%
2.273 97%
2.083 106%
CCT
7008 93%
7974 82%
7839 83%
7643 85%
9315 70%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 100 Hz ≤ 10 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 100 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 10 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 100 Hz est extrêmement faible, de grands risques de fatigue oculaire accrue et de maux de tête en cas d'utilisation prolongée.

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9394 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
30 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 15 ms hausse
↘ 15 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (25 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
48 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 25 ms hausse
↘ 23 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (39.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
4886 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
4594 Points ∼91% -6%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
3892 Points ∼77% -20%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
2951 Points ∼58% -40%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
0 Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (4195 - 5511, n=5)
4868 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=378)
5073 Points ∼100% +4%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
6879 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
5880 Points ∼85% -15%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
5109 Points ∼74% -26%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
3956 Points ∼58% -42%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2528 Points ∼37% -63%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (4229 - 7216, n=5)
6100 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=546)
5569 Points ∼81% -19%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
845 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1595 Points ∼86% +89%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1301 Points ∼71% +54%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
573 Points ∼31% -32%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (780 - 940, n=4)
860 Points ∼47% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=392)
1844 Points ∼100% +118%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
253 Points ∼16%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
419 Points ∼26% +66%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
304 Points ∼19% +20%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
76 Points ∼5% -70%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (197 - 253, n=4)
238 Points ∼15% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=392)
1619 Points ∼100% +540%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
300 Points ∼20%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
501 Points ∼33% +67%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
366 Points ∼24% +22%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
94 Points ∼6% -69%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (238 - 300, n=4)
284 Points ∼19% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=395)
1504 Points ∼100% +401%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
838 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1594 Points ∼88% +90%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1285 Points ∼71% +53%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (775 - 954, n=5)
876 Points ∼48% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=407)
1821 Points ∼100% +117%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
456 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
730 Points ∼33% +60%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
530 Points ∼24% +16%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (450 - 461, n=5)
455 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=407)
2194 Points ∼100% +381%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
507 Points ∼27%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
830 Points ∼44% +64%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
610 Points ∼33% +20%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (504 - 521, n=5)
509 Points ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=408)
1872 Points ∼100% +269%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
834 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1610 Points ∼90% +93%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1232 Points ∼69% +48%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
486 Points ∼27% -42%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (738 - 918, n=4)
847 Points ∼48% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=468)
1781 Points ∼100% +114%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
226 Points ∼17%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
370 Points ∼27% +64%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
254 Points ∼19% +12%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
65 Points ∼5% -71%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (197 - 250, n=4)
223 Points ∼17% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=470)
1350 Points ∼100% +497%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
270 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
446 Points ∼35% +65%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
308 Points ∼24% +14%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
80 Points ∼6% -70%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (239 - 298, n=4)
266 Points ∼21% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=478)
1286 Points ∼100% +376%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
827 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1579 Points ∼93% +91%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1259 Points ∼74% +52%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (755 - 923, n=5)
857 Points ∼51% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=501)
1691 Points ∼100% +104%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
424 Points ∼23%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
724 Points ∼40% +71%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
535 Points ∼29% +26%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (357 - 434, n=5)
398 Points ∼22% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=501)
1815 Points ∼100% +328%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
475 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
823 Points ∼53% +73%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
613 Points ∼39% +29%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (411 - 492, n=5)
451 Points ∼29% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=509)
1562 Points ∼100% +229%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
12725 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
12673 Points ∼88% 0%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9249 Points ∼64% -27%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
8980 Points ∼62% -29%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
8065 Points ∼56% -37%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (12725 - 15348, n=5)
14432 Points ∼100% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=659)
13790 Points ∼96% +8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
7567 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
13510 Points ∼66% +79%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9684 Points ∼48% +28%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
2880 Points ∼14% -62%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2465 Points ∼12% -67%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (7514 - 7695, n=5)
7583 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7567 - 162695, n=659)
20320 Points ∼100% +169%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
8316 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
13315 Points ∼79% +60%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9584 Points ∼57% +15%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
3392 Points ∼20% -59%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2915 Points ∼17% -65%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (8316 - 8657, n=5)
8474 Points ∼50% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8316 - 83518, n=660)
16844 Points ∼100% +103%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
14 fps ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
23 fps ∼65% +64%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
16 fps ∼45% +14%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
5 fps ∼14% -64%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
4.4 fps ∼12% -69%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (14 - 14, n=5)
14 fps ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=689)
35.3 fps ∼100% +152%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
23 fps ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
35 fps ∼100% +52%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
27 fps ∼77% +17%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
13 fps ∼37% -43%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
12 fps ∼34% -48%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (20 - 23, n=5)
21.2 fps ∼61% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=692)
27.3 fps ∼78% +19%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
6.5 fps ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
19 fps ∼97% +192%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
7.1 fps ∼36% +9%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (6.5 - 6.7, n=5)
6.56 fps ∼33% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=608)
19.6 fps ∼100% +202%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
15 fps ∼83%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
9.9 fps ∼55% -34%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
14 fps ∼77% -7%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
8.1 fps ∼45% -46%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (11 - 15, n=5)
13 fps ∼72% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=613)
18.1 fps ∼100% +21%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
4.3 fps ∼27%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6.4 fps ∼40% +49%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
4.6 fps ∼29% +7%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
1.3 fps ∼8% -70%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (2.5 - 4.3, n=5)
3.92 fps ∼24% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=469)
16.1 fps ∼100% +274%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
10 fps ∼65%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
14 fps ∼91% +40%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
10 fps ∼65% 0%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
4.7 fps ∼31% -53%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (7.6 - 11, n=5)
8.92 fps ∼58% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=472)
15.4 fps ∼100% +54%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
3.7 fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
4.1 fps ∼46% +11%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (2.7 - 3.7, n=5)
3.14 fps ∼35% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=172)
8.99 fps ∼100% +143%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
0.85 fps ∼14%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1.2 fps ∼19% +41%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (0.8 - 0.85, n=5)
0.82 fps ∼13% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=172)
6.24 fps ∼100% +634%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
5.8 fps ∼43%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
2.5 fps ∼18% -57%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (2.3 - 5.8, n=5)
4.52 fps ∼33% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=173)
13.6 fps ∼100% +134%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
2.3 fps ∼15%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.7 fps ∼25% +61%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
0.75 fps ∼5% -67%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (2.3 - 4.2, n=5)
2.9 fps ∼19% +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=173)
14.9 fps ∼100% +548%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1.9 fps ∼18%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.5 fps ∼33% +84%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.6 fps ∼24% +37%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (1.9 - 2, n=5)
1.98 fps ∼19% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=398)
10.7 fps ∼100% +463%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
4.1 fps ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
7.3 fps ∼75% +78%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
5.4 fps ∼55% +32%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
1.8 fps ∼18% -56%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (3.1 - 4.1, n=5)
3.58 fps ∼37% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=402)
9.74 fps ∼100% +138%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
65996 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
75175 Points ∼56% +14%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
59990 Points ∼45% -9%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
17073 Points ∼13% -74%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (63421 - 65996, n=5)
64636 Points ∼49% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=291)
133058 Points ∼100% +102%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1037 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1083 Points ∼100% +4%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
705 Points ∼65% -32%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
597 Points ∼55% -42%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (715 - 1037, n=5)
834 Points ∼77% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=621)
751 Points ∼69% -28%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
479 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1007 Points ∼51% +110%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
739 Points ∼37% +54%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
150 Points ∼8% -69%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
145 Points ∼7% -70%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (470 - 483, n=5)
476 Points ∼24% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=621)
1986 Points ∼100% +315%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1153 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
655 Points ∼44% -43%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1209 Points ∼81% +5%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
524 Points ∼35% -55%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
373 Points ∼25% -68%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (531 - 1458, n=5)
1104 Points ∼74% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=621)
1487 Points ∼100% +29%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1480 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
2238 Points ∼77% +51%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1962 Points ∼67% +33%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
1103 Points ∼38% -25%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
963 Points ∼33% -35%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (1419 - 1798, n=5)
1583 Points ∼54% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=621)
2910 Points ∼100% +97%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview A60 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
959 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1124 Points ∼78% +17%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1055 Points ∼73% +10%
Cubot J3 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
477 Points ∼33% -50%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
150 Points ∼10% -84%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (744 - 986, n=5)
901 Points ∼62% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=625)
1450 Points ∼100% +51%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.9 - 108, n=97)
30.9 Points ∼100% +112%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
16.911 Points ∼55% +16%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (13.4 - 15.7, n=5)
14.9 Points ∼48% +2%
Blackview A60 Pro (Chrome 76)
14.571 Points ∼47%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=152)
63.4 Points ∼100% +98%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
34 Points ∼54% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (30 - 35, n=5)
33 Points ∼52% +3%
Blackview A60 Pro (Chrome 76)
32 Points ∼50%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=682)
6403 Points ∼100% +53%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
4701 Points ∼73% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (3920 - 4603, n=5)
4326 Points ∼68% +3%
Blackview A60 Pro (Chrome 76)
4196 Points ∼66%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
3389 Points ∼53% -19%
Wiko Jerry 3 (Chrome 67)
1645 Points ∼26% -61%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Wiko Jerry 3 (Chrome 67)
19458 ms * ∼100% -75%
Cubot J3 Pro (Chrome 73)
16599 ms * ∼85% -49%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
14709 ms * ∼76% -32%
Blackview A60 Pro (Chrome 76)
11124 ms * ∼57%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (10198 - 12215, n=5)
10886 ms * ∼56% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=702)
10678 ms * ∼55% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
10142.7 ms * ∼52% +9%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Blackview A60 ProXiaomi Redmi 7AHonor 7A Cubot J3 ProWiko Jerry 3Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
106%
98%
71%
-24%
24%
105%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
13.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
392%
65.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
398%
60.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
358%
7.4 (Kingston 32GB)
-44%
38.6 (6.38 - 65.7, n=130)
194%
48.7 (9.5 - 87.1, n=413)
271%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
41.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
103%
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
102%
74.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78%
16 (Kingston 32GB)
-62%
57.6 (8.1 - 87.7, n=130)
37%
66.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=413)
59%
Random Write 4KB
9.3
9.6
3%
9.4
1%
10.1
9%
11.23
21%
7.9 (0.49 - 44.9, n=246)
-15%
21.3 (0.14 - 250, n=730)
129%
Random Read 4KB
31.5
57.8
83%
39.2
24%
27.2
-14%
24.18
-23%
21.3 (2.49 - 62.1, n=246)
-32%
46.1 (1.59 - 196, n=730)
46%
Sequential Write 256KB
41.2
68.7
67%
72.5
76%
47.5
15%
50.81
23%
42.6 (8.74 - 106, n=246)
3%
94.6 (2.99 - 590, n=730)
130%
Sequential Read 256KB
286.4
258
-10%
254.8
-11%
235.6
-18%
117.14
-59%
165 (9.66 - 294, n=246)
-42%
266 (12.1 - 1504, n=730)
-7%
 39 °C35.9 °C38.1 °C 
 38.5 °C35.5 °C38.1 °C 
 37.5 °C35.9 °C36.4 °C 
Maximum: 39 °C
Moyenne: 37.2 °C
33.2 °C34.2 °C37.7 °C
32.8 °C34 °C37.5 °C
32.9 °C34.9 °C36.4 °C
Maximum: 37.7 °C
Moyenne: 34.8 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  37.6 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.346.52540.343.23135.634.24040.341.75042.7436334.333.48027.227.310028.529.512526.325.916024.424.420023.429.725021.438.131520.546.84002052.850019.858.163018.761.980018.462.8100023.568.4125017.474160017.475.7200017.575.7250017.574.9315016.965.6400016.962500016.966.563001772.280001775.51000017.269.61250017.155.51600017.149.2SPL66.466.430.683.9N17.920.51.553median 17.5median 62Delta2.912.646.938.238.336.431.83034.135.14439.731.729.8252626.729.523.922.921.832.620.343.519.65018.855.317.560.720.16619.771.217.372.517.473.815.471.416.471.816.472.115.568.515.665.415.76516.169.91669.316.568.616.368.415.968.615.859702969.78225.31.223.752.9median 16.5median 68.428.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseBlackview A60 ProXiaomi Redmi 7A
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Blackview A60 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Redmi 7A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0 / 0.1 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.8 / 2.2 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 3.3 / 4.5 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Blackview A60 Pro
4080 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
4000 mAh
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Cubot J3 Pro
2800 mAh
Wiko Jerry 3
2500 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-5%
-28%
-42%
-21%
-2%
-10%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.8
-0%
1.3
-63%
1.4
-75%
1
-25%
0.813 (0.59 - 1.2, n=4)
-2%
0.878 (0.2 - 3.4, n=757)
-10%
Idle Average *
1.8
1.6
11%
1.6
11%
1.8
-0%
1.5
17%
2.02 (1.8 - 2.42, n=4)
-12%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=756)
4%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
2.2
-0%
2.9
-32%
2.4
-9%
2.3
-5%
2.25 (1.96 - 2.44, n=4)
-2%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=757)
8%
Load Average *
3.3
3.9
-18%
3.7
-12%
5.5
-67%
5
-52%
3.21 (2.82 - 3.43, n=4)
3%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=751)
-23%
Load Maximum *
4.5
5.4
-20%
6.4
-42%
7.2
-60%
6.3
-40%
4.36 (3.57 - 4.76, n=4)
3%
5.9 (1.2 - 14.2, n=751)
-31%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 18min
Blackview A60 Pro
4080 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
4000 mAh
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Cubot J3 Pro
2800 mAh
Wiko Jerry 3
2500 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
16%
-11%
-28%
-47%
Reader / Idle
1543
WiFi v1.3
738
853
16%
657
-11%
532
-28%
394
-47%
Load
286
H.264
902

Points positifs

+ performances
+ prix
+ autonomie
+ luminosité
+ lecteur d'empreintes digitales
+ GPS

Points négatifs

- tactile
- appareils photo
- haut-parleur
- temps de charge
- garantie
En test : le Blackview A60 Pro.
En test : le Blackview A60 Pro.

Le Blackview A60 Pro est un essai honorable de faire mieux que le Xiaomi Redmi 7A, qu’il est capable de concurrencer efficacement dans certains domaines. L’A60 Pro possède une autonomie et des performances comparativement bonnes, ainsi qu’un écran lumineux et bien contrasté. En outre sa connectivité est correcte pour un smartphone à moins de 100 €, et nous avons été surpris de la présence d’un lecteur d’empreintes digitales et d’un GPS précis. L’encoche en goutte d’eau donne à l’appareil un look moderne, mais peut-être clivant.

Cependant, l’A60 Pro est dans l’ensemble inférieur au Redmi 7A, ce dernier ayant un appareil photo bien meilleur, la charge rapide, et un haut-parleur plus efficace. L’A60 Pro possède également une garantie sujette à caution et un tactile peu précis, à l’inverse du Redmi 7A.

Le Blackview A60 Pro possède de bons arguments et un bon rapport qualité / prix. Mais de meilleurs appareils éclipsent ses qualités.

Ainsi, le Blackview A60 Pro est adapté à ceux qui veulent un smartphone au look moderne et qui peuvent accepter ses défauts frustrants. Si vous êtes de ceux-là et que vous cherchez un appareil à moins de 100 €, nous recommandons de jeter un œil au Xiaomi Redmi 7A ou au Honor 7A.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Blackview A60 Pro - 08/18/2019 v6(old)
Florian Schmitt

Châssis
70%
Clavier
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositif de pointage
76%
Connectivité
36 / 60 → 60%
Poids
91%
Autonomie
95%
Écran
85%
Performances en jeu
17 / 63 → 27%
Performances dans les applications
48 / 70 → 69%
Chauffe
89%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
48 / 91 → 53%
Appareil photo
42%
Moyenne
66%
76%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du Blackview A60 Pro : un smartphone convaincant
Florian Schmitt, 2019-08-20 (Update: 2019-08-20)