Notebookcheck

Courte critique du Xiaomi Redmi 7A : le smartphone à petit prix

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduit par Prévots), 08/20/2019

Etonnament peu cher. Le Xiaomi Redmi 7A est disponible pour 100 $. Son prédécesseur était déjà plutôt convaincant vu son faible prix. Au premier abord, le Redmi 7A ne semble pas proposer de nombreux changements. Parvient-t-il à conserver le même rapport performances / prix ?

Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Redmi Gamme)
Processeur
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
Carte graphique
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Mémoire
2048 Mo 
Écran
5.45 pouces 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixel 295 PPP, capacitif, IPS, brillant: oui
Disque dur
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 Go 
, 9.6 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD jusqu'à 256 Go, dédié, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, capteur de proximité, boussole
Réseau
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM, UMTS, LTE (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/38/40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 9.6 x 146.3 x 70.4
Batterie
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 12 MPix f/2,2, 1,12µm, autofocus à détection de phase, flash LED, vidéos à 1080p / ​30 FPS
Appareil photo secondaire: 5 MPix
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Clavier: virtuel, adaptateur secteur, câble USB, outil pour carte SIM, 24 Mois Garantie, radio FM, LED de notification (une couleur), DAS : 0,557 W/kg (tête), 1,166 W/kg (corps), LTE Cat 4 / 5 (150 / 75 Mbit/s), fanless
Poids
165 g, Alimentation: 75 g
Prix
100 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A

Comparaison des tailles

153.6 mm 77.6 mm 9.7 mm 174 g152.4 mm 73 mm 7.8 mm 150 g147 mm 71 mm 9 mm 150 g146.3 mm 70.4 mm 9.6 mm 165 g147.5 mm 71.5 mm 8.3 mm 145 g147.1 mm 70.8 mm 8.5 mm 146 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=424)
223 MBit/s ∼100% +272%
Huawei Y5 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 16 GB eMMC Flash
63 (min: 56, max: 61) MBit/s ∼28% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Adreno 505, 439, 16 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 52, max: 64) MBit/s ∼27%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
59.6 (min: 56, max: 61) MBit/s ∼27% -1%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.5 (min: 49, max: 57) MBit/s ∼25% -7%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 (min: 29, max: 54) MBit/s ∼22% -19%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45 MBit/s ∼20% -25%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=424)
213 MBit/s ∼100% +296%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
56.6 (min: 29, max: 61) MBit/s ∼27% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 (min: 52, max: 59) MBit/s ∼26% +4%
Huawei Y5 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.5 (min: 52, max: 59) MBit/s ∼26% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Adreno 505, 439, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.8 (min: 25, max: 57) MBit/s ∼25%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
52.7 (min: 27, max: 58) MBit/s ∼25% -2%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s ∼22% -13%
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : pont.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : pont.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : champ.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : champ.
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 7A : vue générale.
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 7A : vue générale.
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 7A : pont.
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 7A : pont.
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 7A : champ.
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 7A : champ.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
Xiaomi Redmi 7A - Mire de test.
Xiaomi Redmi 7A - Mire de test.
Xiaomi Redmi 7A - Mire de test zoomée.
Xiaomi Redmi 7A - ColorChecker. La couleur de référence se situe dans la partie inférieure de chaque bloc.
482
cd/m²
505
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
534
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 534 cd/m² Moyenne: 506.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.5 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 88 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 533 cd/m²
Contraste: 888:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
94.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.212
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Honor 7A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Nokia 2.1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Motorola Moto E5 Play
IPS, 960x480, 5.2
Huawei Y5 2019
IPS, 1520x720, 5.71
Screen
21%
25%
6%
-28%
6%
Brightness middle
533
404
-24%
417
-22%
338
-37%
369
-31%
630
18%
Brightness
506
400
-21%
395
-22%
327
-35%
358
-29%
593
17%
Brightness Distribution
88
82
-7%
88
0%
82
-7%
81
-8%
88
0%
Black Level *
0.6
0.26
57%
0.18
70%
0.27
55%
0.4
33%
0.66
-10%
Contrast
888
1554
75%
2317
161%
1252
41%
923
4%
955
8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.6
4.28
24%
6.46
-15%
5.36
4%
9.75
-74%
5.79
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.4
9.97
13%
10.72
6%
9.77
14%
18.28
-60%
9.54
16%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.4
3.5
53%
5.8
22%
6.2
16%
11.8
-59%
7
5%
Gamma
2.212 99%
2.213 99%
2.423 91%
2.345 94%
2.057 107%
2.176 101%
CCT
7974 82%
6899 94%
7839 83%
8460 77%
11971 54%
8420 77%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
78.6

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 384.6 Hz ≤ 10 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 384.6 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 10 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 384.6 Hz est relativement élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevLa fréquence de rafraîchissement de 384.6 Hz est relativement élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.oir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue. Néanmoins certaines personnes pourront toujours percevoir un scintillement.

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9394 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
22 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 11 ms hausse
↘ 11 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (25 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
32 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 15 ms hausse
↘ 17 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (39.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3068 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2471 Points ∼53% -19%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2820 Points ∼61% -8%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1602 Points ∼35% -48%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1635 Points ∼35% -47%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2436 Points ∼53% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3068 - 3267, n=3)
3192 Points ∼69% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3240 - 11598, n=381)
4621 Points ∼100% +51%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
863 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
825 Points ∼59% -4%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
675 Points ∼49% -22%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
636 Points ∼46% -26%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
647 Points ∼47% -25%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
839 Points ∼60% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (863 - 903, n=3)
886 Points ∼64% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (903 - 4824, n=383)
1387 Points ∼100% +61%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
4594 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
3892 Points ∼77% -15%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3146 Points ∼62% -32%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3209 Points ∼63% -30%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4195 Points ∼83% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (4594 - 4791, n=3)
4669 Points ∼92% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=378)
5073 Points ∼100% +10%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
5880 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6194 Points ∼100% +5%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
5109 Points ∼82% -13%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
4152 Points ∼67% -29%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
5616 Points ∼91% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (5880 - 6228, n=3)
6104 Points ∼99% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=546)
5569 Points ∼90% -5%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
2134 Points ∼90%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1868 Points ∼79% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (2134 - 2172, n=3)
2152 Points ∼91% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2051 - 15735, n=61)
2372 Points ∼100% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
408 Points ∼17%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
210 Points ∼9% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (401 - 412, n=3)
407 Points ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 14536, n=61)
2389 Points ∼100% +486%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
497 Points ∼24%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
262 Points ∼13% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (490 - 502, n=3)
496 Points ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 14786, n=64)
2076 Points ∼100% +318%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1595 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
763 Points ∼41% -52%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1301 Points ∼71% -18%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
940 Points ∼51% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1500 - 1657, n=3)
1584 Points ∼86% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=392)
1844 Points ∼100% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
419 Points ∼26%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
260 Points ∼16% -38%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
304 Points ∼19% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
250 Points ∼15% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (413 - 419, n=3)
417 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=392)
1619 Points ∼100% +286%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
501 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
305 Points ∼20% -39%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
366 Points ∼24% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
299 Points ∼20% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (492 - 502, n=3)
498 Points ∼33% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=395)
1504 Points ∼100% +200%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1594 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
807 Points ∼44% -49%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1285 Points ∼71% -19%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
885 Points ∼49% -44%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
877 Points ∼48% -45%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
924 Points ∼51% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1516 - 1594, n=3)
1567 Points ∼86% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=407)
1821 Points ∼100% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
730 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
445 Points ∼20% -39%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
530 Points ∼24% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
250 Points ∼11% -66%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
249 Points ∼11% -66%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
451 Points ∼21% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (712 - 732, n=3)
725 Points ∼33% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=407)
2194 Points ∼100% +201%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
830 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
494 Points ∼26% -40%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
610 Points ∼33% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
297 Points ∼16% -64%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
296 Points ∼16% -64%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
509 Points ∼27% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (807 - 832, n=3)
823 Points ∼44% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=408)
1872 Points ∼100% +126%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1610 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
828 Points ∼46% -49%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1232 Points ∼69% -23%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
918 Points ∼52% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1575 - 1651, n=3)
1612 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=468)
1781 Points ∼100% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
370 Points ∼27%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
225 Points ∼17% -39%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
254 Points ∼19% -31%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
197 Points ∼15% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (366 - 370, n=3)
369 Points ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=470)
1350 Points ∼100% +265%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
446 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
268 Points ∼21% -40%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
308 Points ∼24% -31%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
239 Points ∼19% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (441 - 447, n=3)
445 Points ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=478)
1286 Points ∼100% +188%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1579 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
840 Points ∼50% -47%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1259 Points ∼74% -20%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
892 Points ∼53% -44%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
819 Points ∼48% -48%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
911 Points ∼54% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1568 - 1596, n=3)
1581 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=501)
1691 Points ∼100% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
724 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
403 Points ∼22% -44%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
535 Points ∼29% -26%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
46 Points ∼3% -94%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
199 Points ∼11% -73%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
362 Points ∼20% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (704 - 724, n=3)
717 Points ∼40% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=501)
1815 Points ∼100% +151%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
823 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
456 Points ∼29% -45%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
613 Points ∼39% -26%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
58 Points ∼4% -93%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
239 Points ∼15% -71%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
418 Points ∼27% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (802 - 824, n=3)
816 Points ∼52% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=509)
1562 Points ∼100% +90%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
12673 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
14128 Points ∼94% +11%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9249 Points ∼62% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10427 Points ∼69% -18%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10784 Points ∼72% -15%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
15004 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (12096 - 12673, n=3)
12386 Points ∼83% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=659)
13790 Points ∼92% +9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
13510 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6785 Points ∼33% -50%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9684 Points ∼48% -28%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5487 Points ∼27% -59%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5712 Points ∼28% -58%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7514 Points ∼37% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (13440 - 13615, n=3)
13522 Points ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7567 - 162695, n=659)
20320 Points ∼100% +50%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
13315 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7671 Points ∼46% -42%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9584 Points ∼57% -28%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6133 Points ∼36% -54%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6379 Points ∼38% -52%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
8452 Points ∼50% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (13192 - 13315, n=3)
13251 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8316 - 83518, n=660)
16844 Points ∼100% +27%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
23 fps ∼65%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
13 fps ∼37% -43%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
16 fps ∼45% -30%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼22% -67%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼22% -67%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
14 fps ∼40% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (23 - 23, n=3)
23 fps ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=689)
35.3 fps ∼100% +53%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
35 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
19 fps ∼54% -46%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
27 fps ∼77% -23%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
14 fps ∼40% -60%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
20 fps ∼57% -43%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
21 fps ∼60% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (34 - 35, n=3)
34.3 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=692)
27.3 fps ∼78% -22%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
19 fps ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.3 fps ∼32% -67%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
7.1 fps ∼36% -63%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
2.7 fps ∼14% -86%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
2.7 fps ∼14% -86%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
6.5 fps ∼33% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (9.8 - 19, n=3)
12.9 fps ∼66% -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=608)
19.6 fps ∼100% +3%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
9.9 fps ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
12 fps ∼66% +21%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
14 fps ∼77% +41%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6.1 fps ∼34% -38%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
11 fps ∼61% +11%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
12 fps ∼66% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (9.9 - 18, n=3)
15.3 fps ∼85% +55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=613)
18.1 fps ∼100% +83%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6.4 fps ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4 fps ∼25% -37%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
4.6 fps ∼29% -28%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.3 fps ∼27% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (6.4 - 6.4, n=3)
6.4 fps ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=469)
16.1 fps ∼100% +152%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
14 fps ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7.5 fps ∼49% -46%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
10 fps ∼65% -29%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7.8 fps ∼51% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (13 - 14, n=3)
13.3 fps ∼86% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=472)
15.4 fps ∼100% +10%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
4.1 fps ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.7 fps ∼30% -34%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.8 fps ∼31% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.9 - 4.1, n=3)
3.97 fps ∼44% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=172)
8.99 fps ∼100% +119%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1.2 fps ∼19%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
0.85 fps ∼14% -29%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
0.8 fps ∼13% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1.2 - 1.2, n=3)
1.2 fps ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=172)
6.24 fps ∼100% +420%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.3 fps ∼32%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.3 fps ∼32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (6.4 - 6.6, n=2)
6.5 fps ∼48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=173)
13.6 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.7 fps ∼25%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.3 (min: 4.3) fps ∼15% -38%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.3 fps ∼15% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.6 - 3.7, n=3)
3.67 fps ∼25% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=173)
14.9 fps ∼100% +303%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.5 fps ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.9 fps ∼18% -46%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.6 fps ∼24% -26%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2 fps ∼19% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.5 - 3.6, n=3)
3.53 fps ∼33% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=398)
10.7 fps ∼100% +206%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
7.3 fps ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.2 fps ∼33% -56%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
5.4 fps ∼55% -26%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
3.2 fps ∼33% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (7 - 7.3, n=3)
7.1 fps ∼73% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=402)
9.74 fps ∼100% +33%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
75175 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
61753 Points ∼46% -18%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
59990 Points ∼45% -20%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
63421 Points ∼48% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (75175 - 79792, n=3)
77540 Points ∼58% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=291)
133058 Points ∼100% +77%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1083 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
733 Points ∼68% -32%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
705 Points ∼65% -35%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
649 Points ∼60% -40%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
720 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
775 Points ∼72% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (834 - 1083, n=3)
918 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=621)
751 Points ∼69% -31%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1007 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
482 Points ∼24% -52%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
739 Points ∼37% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
428 Points ∼22% -57%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
418 Points ∼21% -58%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
471 Points ∼24% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1000 - 1009, n=3)
1005 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=621)
1986 Points ∼100% +97%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
655 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
607 Points ∼41% -7%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1209 Points ∼81% +85%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
502 Points ∼34% -23%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
490 Points ∼33% -25%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1421 Points ∼96% +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (655 - 1335, n=3)
1102 Points ∼74% +68%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=621)
1487 Points ∼100% +127%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
2238 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1434 Points ∼49% -36%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1962 Points ∼67% -12%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1228 Points ∼42% -45%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1241 Points ∼43% -45%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1798 Points ∼62% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (2238 - 2687, n=3)
2516 Points ∼86% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=621)
2910 Points ∼100% +30%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1124 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
745 Points ∼51% -34%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1055 Points ∼73% -6%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
643 Points ∼44% -43%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
654 Points ∼45% -42%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
983 Points ∼68% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1124 - 1312, n=3)
1249 Points ∼86% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=625)
1450 Points ∼100% +29%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.9 - 108, n=97)
30.9 Points ∼100% +83%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
16.911 Points ∼55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (15.9 - 16.9, n=2)
16.4 Points ∼53% -3%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)
15.682 Points ∼51% -7%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (59.7 - 123, n=85)
34.4 runs/min ∼100% +86%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chome 76)
18.45 runs/min ∼54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (18.2 - 18.5, n=2)
18.3 runs/min ∼53% -1%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chome 74)
14.7 runs/min ∼43% -20%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=152)
63.4 Points ∼100% +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (34 - 38, n=3)
36.3 Points ∼57% +7%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)
35 Points ∼55% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
34 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
30 Points ∼47% -12%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=682)
6403 Points ∼100% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (4701 - 4958, n=3)
4823 Points ∼75% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
4701 Points ∼73%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)
4603 Points ∼72% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
4332 Points ∼68% -8%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
3389 Points ∼53% -28%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
2503 Points ∼39% -47%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
2412 Points ∼38% -49%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
14709 ms * ∼100% -45%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
13821 ms * ∼94% -36%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
13477 ms * ∼92% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
10739.7 ms * ∼73% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=702)
10678 ms * ∼73% -5%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)
10364 ms * ∼70% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
10142.7 ms * ∼69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9768 - 10143, n=3)
9914 ms * ∼67% +2%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Xiaomi Redmi 7AXiaomi Redmi 6AHonor 7A Nokia 2.1Motorola Moto E5 PlayHuawei Y5 2019Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
84%
-5%
0%
43%
1%
-38%
16%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
65.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
61.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
28.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-55%
63.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
38.6 (6.38 - 65.7, n=130)
-40%
48.7 (9.5 - 87.1, n=413)
-25%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
85.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
79.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
83.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
81.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
57.6 (8.1 - 87.7, n=130)
-32%
66.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=413)
-22%
Random Write 4KB
9.6
52.23
444%
9.4
-2%
13.45
40%
43.16
350%
13.1
36%
7.9 (0.49 - 44.9, n=246)
-18%
21.3 (0.14 - 250, n=730)
122%
Random Read 4KB
57.8
33.94
-41%
39.2
-32%
50.46
-13%
46.31
-20%
62.1
7%
21.3 (2.49 - 62.1, n=246)
-63%
46.1 (1.59 - 196, n=730)
-20%
Sequential Write 256KB
68.7
131.67
92%
72.5
6%
51.18
-26%
52.2
-24%
45.2
-34%
42.6 (8.74 - 106, n=246)
-38%
94.6 (2.99 - 590, n=730)
38%
Sequential Read 256KB
258
277.54
8%
254.8
-1%
288.26
12%
279
8%
272.1
5%
165 (9.66 - 294, n=246)
-36%
266 (12.1 - 1504, n=730)
3%
010203040Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.30.2.4: Ø29.9 (26-31)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.30.2.4: Ø29.9 (28-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.6.3a: Ø23.6 (15-30)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.6.3a: Ø25.7 (3-30)
 40.5 °C38.3 °C37.5 °C 
 40.5 °C38.5 °C38.2 °C 
 40 °C38.9 °C38.2 °C 
Maximum: 40.5 °C
Moyenne: 39 °C
36.5 °C38.7 °C39.9 °C
36 °C38.5 °C39.9 °C
36.3 °C39.2 °C39.5 °C
Maximum: 39.9 °C
Moyenne: 38.3 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  35.5 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.938.22538.336.43131.8304034.135.1504439.76331.729.880252610026.729.512523.922.916021.832.620020.343.525019.65031518.855.340017.560.750020.16663019.771.280017.372.5100017.473.8125015.471.4160016.471.8200016.472.1250015.568.5315015.665.4400015.765500016.169.963001669.3800016.568.61000016.368.41250015.968.61600015.859SPL702969.782N25.31.223.752.9median 16.5median 68.4Delta28.936.945.536.544.937.239.137.641.231.73523.823.724.425.123.625.119.922.723.32418.430.718.238.215.845.114.653.415.557.21361.512.364.712.166.111.965.810.768.210.768.110.566.610.366.810.767.210.565.510.56510.663.210.662.510.553.710.641.461.552.561.424.177.814.68.214.50.639.8median 11.9median 62.53.412.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 7AXiaomi Redmi 6A
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Redmi 6A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.1 / 0.5 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.6 / 2.2 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 3.9 / 5.4 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto E5 Play
2120 mAh
Huawei Y5 2019
3020 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
17%
-22%
16%
-3%
-10%
7%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.7
12%
1.3
-63%
0.7
12%
1.2
-50%
1.2
-50%
0.723 (0.63 - 0.8, n=3)
10%
0.878 (0.2 - 3.4, n=757)
-10%
Idle Average *
1.6
1.2
25%
1.6
-0%
1.2
25%
1.6
-0%
1.9
-19%
1.72 (1.6 - 1.9, n=3)
-8%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=756)
-8%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
2
9%
2.9
-32%
1.9
14%
2
9%
2.4
-9%
2.05 (1.73 - 2.21, n=3)
7%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=757)
8%
Load Average *
3.9
3.4
13%
3.7
5%
3.2
18%
3.6
8%
3.3
15%
3.37 (3.04 - 3.9, n=3)
14%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=751)
-4%
Load Maximum *
5.4
4
26%
6.4
-19%
4.8
11%
4.5
17%
4.6
15%
4.77 (4.15 - 5.4, n=3)
12%
5.9 (1.2 - 14.2, n=751)
-9%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
25h 43min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 13min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
15h 02min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
4h 46min
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto E5 Play
2120 mAh
Huawei Y5 2019
3020 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
-11%
-23%
-5%
-55%
-17%
Reader / Idle
1543
1256
-19%
H.264
902
732
-19%
WiFi v1.3
853
761
-11%
657
-23%
809
-5%
382.9
-55%
709
-17%
Load
286
249
-13%

Points positifs

+ rapport performances / prix
+ autonomie
+ ergonomie du châssis
+ luminosité
+ haut-parleurs
+ logiciel

Points négatifs

- précision du GPS
- qualité vocale
- absence de lecteur d'empreintes digitales
- contraste de l'écran

Verdict

En test : le Xiaomi Redmi 7A.
En test : le Xiaomi Redmi 7A.

Les smartphones Redmi de Xiaomi cassent les prix – ils établissent sans cesse de nouvelles normes dans leur gamme de prix : le Redmi 7A est disponible pour environ 100 $ (en fonction de la configuration), et propose des fonctionnalités que nous ne voyons que dans des appareils deux fois plus chers. Par exemple, il tourne sur un Snapdragon 439, un SoC puissant vu le prix de l’appareil. La très bonne autonomie, les excellents haut-parleurs, et la stabilité des performances en jeu finissent de parfaire l’ensemble. L’appareil prend des photos honnêtes, l’écran est lumineux, et la chauffe en cas de sollicitations est acceptable. Les nouveaux coloris donnent au Xiaomi un look frais et moderne, et celui-ci s’avère agréable à prendre en main. Grâce à sa fonctionnalité de charge rapide, le smartphone se recharge rapidement.

Voilà un nombre impressionnant de points forts pour un appareil aussi abordable, et peu de concurrents dans cette gamme de prix peuvent le suivre. Il fait même mieux que son prédécesseur, avec une meilleure autonomie et de meilleures performances. Le fait que les smartphones Redmi A n’aient pas de lecteur d’empreintes digitales est dommage, tout comme l’imprécision du GPS et l’oreillette d’appel un peu trop faible.

Ceux qui recherchent un smartphone abordable et qui veulent cependant de bonnes performances et une bonne autonomie pourraient être séduits par le Redmi 7A.

Nous pouvons vraiment recommander le Xiaomi Redmi 7A. Il faut seulement s’assurer de bien acheter la version globale auprès d’un revendeur faible, faute de quoi vous pourriez avoir des problèmes avec l’adaptateur secteur et avec la garantie.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Xiaomi Redmi 7A - 08/08/2019 v6(old)
Florian Schmitt

Châssis
74%
Clavier
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositif de pointage
93%
Connectivité
39 / 60 → 65%
Poids
91%
Autonomie
96%
Écran
83%
Performances en jeu
32 / 63 → 50%
Performances dans les applications
50 / 70 → 71%
Chauffe
87%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 72%
Appareil photo
63%
Moyenne
72%
83%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du Xiaomi Redmi 7A : le smartphone à petit prix
Florian Schmitt, 2019-08-20 (Update: 2019-08-20)