Notebookcheck

Courte critique du smartphone Honor 8A

Stefan Schomberg, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Stefanie Voigt (traduit par Prévots), 06/03/2019

Sans fioritures. Grand écran avec encoche en goutte d’eau, finesse, processeur efficient, et un appareil photo sensible à la lumière, voilà les points forts du Honor 8A selon son constructeur. Vu le faible prix de l’appareil, cela semble presque trop beau pour être vrai - qu’en est-il vraiment ?

Honor 8A (8 Gamme)
Processeur
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
Carte graphique
PowerVR GE8320
Mémoire
2048 Mo 
Écran
6.09 pouces 19.5:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 276 PPP, capacitif, IPS, brillant: oui
Disque dur
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 Go 
, 17 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD (jusqu'à 512 Go, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, capteur de proximité
Réseau
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1 800, 1 900), UMTS (850, 900, 1 900, 2 100), LTE, 3 (1 800 MHz), 20 (800 MHz), 1 (2 100 MHz), 5 (850 MHz), 8 (900 MHz), 38 (2 600 MHz), 40 (2 300 MHz), 41 (2 600 MHz), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8 x 156.28 x 73.5
Batterie
3020 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 13 MPix f/1,8
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix f/2,0
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: 1, Clavier: virtuel, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, outil pour carte SIM, câble USB, adaptateur secteur, 24 Mois Garantie, DAS (tête) : 0,43 W/kg, DAS (corps) : 1,01 W/kg, fanless
Poids
150 g, Alimentation: 25 g
Prix
159 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Honor 8A
Honor 8A

Comparaison des tailles

158.7 mm 75.6 mm 8.5 mm 180 g157.2 mm 76 mm 7.98 mm 167 g156.28 mm 73.5 mm 8 mm 150 g156.28 mm 73.5 mm 8 mm 150 g153.6 mm 73.1 mm 8.5 mm 160 g152.4 mm 73 mm 7.8 mm 150 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=390)
222 MBit/s ∼100% +236%
Huawei Y6 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
69 (min: 61, max: 66) MBit/s ∼31% +5%
Honor 8A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 32 GB eMMC Flash
66 (min: 58, max: 65) MBit/s ∼30%
Wiko View 2 Go
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.7 (min: 53, max: 57) MBit/s ∼25% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Adreno 506, 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.4 (min: 49, max: 54) MBit/s ∼23% -22%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45 MBit/s ∼20% -32%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=390)
213 MBit/s ∼100% +477%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Adreno 506, 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 (min: 52, max: 61) MBit/s ∼26% +50%
Wiko View 2 Go
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53 (min: 36, max: 58) MBit/s ∼25% +44%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s ∼22% +27%
Huawei Y6 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
37.8 (min: 29, max: 46) MBit/s ∼18% +2%
Honor 8A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 32 GB eMMC Flash
36.9 (min: 22, max: 52) MBit/s ∼17%
010203040506070Tooltip
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø61.8 (58-65)
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø51.1 (49-54)
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø64 (61-66)
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø54.6 (53-57)
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø37.1 (22-52)
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55.5 (52-61)
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø38 (29-46)
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø53.2 (36-58)
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Ville.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Ville.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Ville.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Ville.
Honor 8A : vue générale.
Honor 8A : vue générale.
Honor 8A - Ville.
Honor 8A - Ville.
Honor 8A - Ville.
Honor 8A - Ville.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
Honor 8A
Honor 8A
Honor 8A - Mire de test.
Mire de test.
Honor 8A - ColorChecker. La couleur de référence se situe dans la partie inférieure de chaque bloc.
Honor 8A - Mire de test zoomée.
546
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
558
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
535
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 558 cd/m² Moyenne: 542.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.19 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 94 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 522 cd/m²
Contraste: 1111:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Honor 8A
IPS, 1520x720, 6.09
Honor 7A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Xiaomi Redmi 7
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Huawei Y6 2019
IPS LCD, 1560x720, 6.09
Wiko View 2 Go
IPS, 1512x720, 5.93
Screen
7%
2%
7%
7%
Brightness middle
522
417
-20%
444
-15%
487
-7%
465
-11%
Brightness
542
395
-27%
441
-19%
485
-11%
462
-15%
Brightness Distribution
94
88
-6%
90
-4%
89
-5%
84
-11%
Black Level *
0.47
0.18
62%
0.45
4%
0.35
26%
0.32
32%
Contrast
1111
2317
109%
987
-11%
1391
25%
1453
31%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4
6.46
-62%
3.94
1%
4.3
-8%
4.76
-19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.5
10.72
-13%
6.72
29%
10.1
-6%
7.71
19%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.6
5.8
12%
4.8
27%
4.1
38%
4.6
30%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.423 91%
2.294 96%
2.09 105%
2.674 82%
CCT
7258 90%
7839 83%
7445 87%
7312 89%
6806 96%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9580 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
24.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 9.2 ms hausse
↘ 15.6 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (25.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
48 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 20.4 ms hausse
↘ 27.6 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (40.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2893 Points ∼64%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2127 Points ∼47% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
3850 Points ∼85% +33%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1607 Points ∼35% -44%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2461 Points ∼54% -15%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
2893 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=290)
4547 Points ∼100% +57%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3834 Points ∼86%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2820 Points ∼63% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
4301 Points ∼96% +12%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2354 Points ∼53% -39%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2542 Points ∼57% -34%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
3834 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=344)
4481 Points ∼100% +17%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
855 Points ∼64%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
675 Points ∼51% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1227 Points ∼92% +44%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
832 Points ∼63% -3%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
674 Points ∼51% -21%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
855 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (437 - 4824, n=345)
1331 Points ∼100% +56%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4886 Points ∼83%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
3892 Points ∼66% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
5912 Points ∼100% +21%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
5511 Points ∼93% +13%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
3596 Points ∼61% -26%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
4886 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 10450, n=339)
4917 Points ∼83% +1%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4045 Points ∼57%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
5109 Points ∼72% +26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
7117 Points ∼100% +76%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4229 Points ∼59% +5%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
4323 Points ∼61% +7%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
4045 Points ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4290 - 14439, n=507)
5361 Points ∼75% +33%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2079 Points ∼13%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
15735 Points ∼100% +657%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1740 Points ∼11% -16%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
2079 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2103 - 15735, n=31)
2534 Points ∼16% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
355 Points ∼2%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14536 Points ∼100% +3995%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
203 Points ∼1% -43%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
355 Points ∼2% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (914 - 14536, n=31)
2504 Points ∼17% +605%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
435 Points ∼3%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14786 Points ∼100% +3299%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
253 Points ∼2% -42%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
435 Points ∼3% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1063 - 14786, n=33)
2206 Points ∼15% +407%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1021 Points ∼48%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1301 Points ∼61% +27%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
2133 Points ∼100% +109%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
876 Points ∼41% -14%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1167 Points ∼55% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
1021 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=354)
1812 Points ∼85% +77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
432 Points ∼28%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
304 Points ∼20% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
469 Points ∼30% +9%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
197 Points ∼13% -54%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
305 Points ∼20% -29%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
432 Points ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=354)
1556 Points ∼100% +260%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
496 Points ∼34%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
366 Points ∼25% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
567 Points ∼39% +14%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
238 Points ∼16% -52%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
365 Points ∼25% -26%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
496 Points ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=357)
1452 Points ∼100% +193%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
961 Points ∼45%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1285 Points ∼60% +34%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
2147 Points ∼100% +123%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
889 Points ∼41% -7%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1184 Points ∼55% +23%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
961 Points ∼45% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=369)
1788 Points ∼83% +86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
695 Points ∼32%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
530 Points ∼25% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
813 Points ∼38% +17%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
450 Points ∼21% -35%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
529 Points ∼25% -24%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
695 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=369)
2147 Points ∼100% +209%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
741 Points ∼41%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
610 Points ∼33% -18%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
943 Points ∼52% +27%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
505 Points ∼28% -32%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
603 Points ∼33% -19%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
741 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7980, n=370)
1826 Points ∼100% +146%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
998 Points ∼47%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1232 Points ∼58% +23%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
2119 Points ∼100% +112%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
898 Points ∼42% -10%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1103 Points ∼52% +11%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
998 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4262, n=430)
1741 Points ∼82% +74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
223 Points ∼17%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
254 Points ∼20% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
424 Points ∼33% +90%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
250 Points ∼19% +12%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
257 Points ∼20% +15%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
223 Points ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=432)
1284 Points ∼100% +476%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
270 Points ∼22%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
308 Points ∼25% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
516 Points ∼42% +91%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
298 Points ∼24% +10%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
310 Points ∼25% +15%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
270 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=440)
1229 Points ∼100% +355%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
997 Points ∼47%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1259 Points ∼59% +26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
2132 Points ∼100% +114%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
869 Points ∼41% -13%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1136 Points ∼53% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
997 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4240, n=463)
1648 Points ∼77% +65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
429 Points ∼24%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
535 Points ∼31% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
807 Points ∼46% +88%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
357 Points ∼20% -17%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
523 Points ∼30% +22%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
429 Points ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=463)
1753 Points ∼100% +309%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
491 Points ∼33%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
613 Points ∼41% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
936 Points ∼62% +91%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
411 Points ∼27% -16%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
594 Points ∼40% +21%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
491 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7673, n=471)
1503 Points ∼100% +206%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
10689 Points ∼68%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9249 Points ∼59% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
15735 Points ∼100% +47%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
14037 Points ∼89% +31%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
8971 Points ∼57% -16%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
10689 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8253 - 45072, n=622)
13486 Points ∼86% +26%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7061 Points ∼36%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9684 Points ∼50% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14536 Points ∼75% +106%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7567 Points ∼39% +7%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9686 Points ∼50% +37%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
7061 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3585 - 162695, n=622)
19503 Points ∼100% +176%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7637 Points ∼47%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9584 Points ∼59% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14786 Points ∼91% +94%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
8431 Points ∼52% +10%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9517 Points ∼58% +25%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
7637 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4164 - 83518, n=623)
16300 Points ∼100% +113%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
19 fps ∼56%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
16 fps ∼47% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
25 fps ∼73% +32%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
14 fps ∼41% -26%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
16 fps ∼47% -16%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
19 fps ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=648)
34.1 fps ∼100% +79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
26 fps ∼70%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
27 fps ∼73% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
37 fps ∼100% +42%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
20 fps ∼54% -23%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
25 fps ∼68% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
26 fps ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=651)
26.4 fps ∼71% +2%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
9.8 fps ∼52%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
7.1 fps ∼38% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
11 fps ∼59% +12%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
6.5 fps ∼35% -34%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
7.1 fps ∼38% -28%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
9.8 fps ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=567)
18.7 fps ∼100% +91%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
16 fps ∼84%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
14 fps ∼74% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
19 fps ∼100% +19%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
11 fps ∼58% -31%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
13 fps ∼68% -19%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
16 fps ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=572)
17.3 fps ∼91% +8%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
5.8 fps ∼37%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
4.6 fps ∼30% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
7 fps ∼45% +21%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.2 fps ∼27% -28%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.5 fps ∼16% -57%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
5.8 fps ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=429)
15.5 fps ∼100% +167%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
9.6 fps ∼64%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
10 fps ∼67% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14 fps ∼94% +46%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7.6 fps ∼51% -21%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9.7 fps ∼65% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
9.6 fps ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=432)
14.9 fps ∼100% +55%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
0 fps ∼0%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
4.2 fps ∼47%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.7 fps ∼30%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.8 fps ∼31%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=133)
8.98 fps ∼100%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
0 fps ∼0%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1.3 fps ∼21%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
0.8 fps ∼13%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
0.88 fps ∼14%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=133)
6.19 fps ∼100%
Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.8 fps ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
7 fps ∼52% +3%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.3 fps ∼17% -66%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
4.7 fps ∼35% -31%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
6.8 fps ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=134)
13.4 fps ∼100% +97%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.8 fps ∼26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
3.9 fps ∼26% +3%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.2 fps ∼28% +11%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.6 fps ∼17% -32%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
3.8 fps ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=133)
14.9 fps ∼100% +292%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.6 fps ∼25%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.6 fps ∼25% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
3.9 fps ∼37% +50%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2 fps ∼19% -23%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.6 fps ∼25% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
2.6 fps ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=358)
10.5 fps ∼100% +304%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.8 fps ∼40%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
5.4 fps ∼57% +42%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
7.8 fps ∼83% +105%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
3.1 fps ∼33% -18%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
5 fps ∼53% +32%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
3.8 fps ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=362)
9.44 fps ∼100% +148%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
fps ∼0%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 651, n=56)
27.4 fps ∼100%
Vulkan Medium Native (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
fps ∼0%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 606, n=52)
24.1 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
fps ∼0%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 739, n=51)
29.7 fps ∼100%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
Points ∼0%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
59990 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
102781 Points ∼81%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
64157 Points ∼50%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
56793 Points ∼45%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
0 Points ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (138589 - 374820, n=251)
127380 Points ∼100%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
816 Points ∼76%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
705 Points ∼66% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1071 Points ∼100% +31%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
785 Points ∼73% -4%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
673 Points ∼63% -18%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
816 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=581)
731 Points ∼68% -10%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
792 Points ∼42%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
739 Points ∼39% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1072 Points ∼57% +35%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
470 Points ∼25% -41%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
741 Points ∼39% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
792 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=581)
1890 Points ∼100% +139%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1366 Points ∼78%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1209 Points ∼69% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1758 Points ∼100% +29%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1458 Points ∼83% +7%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
884 Points ∼50% -35%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
1366 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 6283, n=581)
1405 Points ∼80% +3%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2533 Points ∼62%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1962 Points ∼48% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
4090 Points ∼100% +61%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1755 Points ∼43% -31%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1808 Points ∼44% -29%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
2533 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=581)
2790 Points ∼68% +10%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1223 Points ∼72%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1055 Points ∼62% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1695 Points ∼100% +39%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
986 Points ∼58% -19%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
945 Points ∼56% -23%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
1223 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=585)
1384 Points ∼82% +13%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
133 Points ∼18%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
133 Points ∼18% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=94)
723 Points ∼100% +444%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (30.9 - 108, n=62)
29.6 Points ∼100% +118%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)
26.9 Points ∼91% +98%
Huawei Y6 2019
15.326 Points ∼52% +13%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
13.6 Points ∼46% 0%
Honor 8A
13.595 Points ∼46%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=59)
34.2 runs/min ∼100% +131%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chome 73)
27.44 runs/min ∼80% +85%
Huawei Y6 2019 (Chrome)
15.69 runs/min ∼46% +6%
Honor 8A (Chrome)
14.8 runs/min ∼43%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
14.8 runs/min ∼43% 0%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 161, n=115)
64.2 Points ∼100% +121%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)
58 Points ∼90% +100%
Huawei Y6 2019
35 Points ∼55% +21%
Honor 8A (Chrome)
29 Points ∼45%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
29 Points ∼45% 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)
8258 Points ∼100% +90%
Average of class Smartphone (3126 - 43280, n=642)
6100 Points ∼74% +40%
Huawei Y6 2019 (Chrome)
4437 Points ∼54% +2%
Honor 8A (Chrome)
4347 Points ∼53%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
4347 Points ∼53% 0%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
3389 Points ∼41% -22%
Wiko View 2 Go (Chrome 71)
3089 Points ∼37% -29%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
14709 ms * ∼100% -30%
Wiko View 2 Go (Chrome 71)
13373 ms * ∼91% -18%
Honor 8A (Chrome)
11323 ms * ∼77%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
11323 ms * ∼77% -0%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=661)
10927 ms * ∼74% +3%
Huawei Y6 2019
10198 ms * ∼69% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)
4856.4 ms * ∼33% +57%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Honor 8AHonor 7A Xiaomi Redmi 7Huawei Y6 2019Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
3%
5%
-12%
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.83
65.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
63.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
64.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
49.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=129)
-20%
48.2 (9.5 - 87.1, n=389)
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.92
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
85.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
83.16 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
67.9 (8.2 - 96.5, n=129)
-17%
66.2 (8.1 - 96.5, n=389)
-19%
Random Write 4KB
15
9.4
-37%
14.4
-4%
15
0%
18.8 (0.75 - 77.3, n=171)
25%
19.2 (0.14 - 250, n=691)
28%
Random Read 4KB
61
39.2
-36%
73.6
21%
69
13%
38.2 (3.59 - 117, n=171)
-37%
43.7 (1.59 - 175, n=691)
-28%
Sequential Write 256KB
104
72.5
-30%
84.7
-19%
107.78
4%
95 (14.8 - 189, n=171)
-9%
90.1 (2.99 - 392, n=691)
-13%
Sequential Read 256KB
265
254.8
-4%
298
12%
279.26
5%
234 (25.8 - 452, n=171)
-12%
254 (12.1 - 1468, n=691)
-4%
GameBench PUBG (low graphics settings)
010203040Tooltip
; 0.12.0: Ø20.6 (1-33)
GameBench Asphalt 9 (low graphics settings)
01020Tooltip
; 1.5.4a: Ø10 (5-17)
Gamebench Shadow Fight 3 (low graphics settings)
010203040506070Tooltip
; 1.18.3: Ø43 (1-61)
 32.4 °C32 °C34.6 °C 
 31.8 °C31.7 °C32.7 °C 
 30.8 °C30.6 °C33 °C 
Maximum: 34.6 °C
Moyenne: 32.2 °C
28.8 °C29.4 °C30.2 °C
29 °C29.5 °C31.7 °C
29.6 °C29.5 °C31 °C
Maximum: 31.7 °C
Moyenne: 29.9 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  31.4 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.536.42531.932.33122.325.44021.723.65029.237.56326.723.98020.323.910020.525.7125233816015.653.820017.852.925016.357.831515.462.640015.964.150015.864.363013.368.580014.168.6100014.172.812501477160013.577.2200013.480.3250013.979.6315014.279.8400013.979.3500014.679.1630014.276.2800014.776.5100001572.31250014.961.21600015.347.3SPL26.489.4N0.877.4median 14.7median 68.6Delta0.91142.646.338.438.734.231.337.326.53031.826.62823.222.421.221.12121.616.326.416.636.715.841.213.546.312.251.61252.611.75510.558.79.661.69.563.6965.38.567.48.569.28.371.38.269.38.167.68.165.18.162.38.264.48.353.38.235.265.451.721.959.978.619.17.10.31239median 9.5median 58.72.812.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor 8AHonor 7A
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor 8A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 7A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.14 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.73 / 2.07 / 2.14 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 4.3 / 5.96 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 8A
3020 mAh
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 7
4000 mAh
Huawei Y6 2019
3020 mAh
Wiko View 2 Go
4000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-17%
2%
21%
2%
0%
2%
Idle Minimum *
0.73
1.3
-78%
1
-37%
0.59
19%
0.8
-10%
0.73
-0%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=723)
-21%
Idle Average *
2.07
1.6
23%
1.7
18%
1.94
6%
2
3%
2.07
-0%
1.737 (0.6 - 6.2, n=722)
16%
Idle Maximum *
2.14
2.9
-36%
2.1
2%
1.96
8%
2.3
-7%
2.14
-0%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=723)
6%
Load Average *
4.3
3.7
14%
3.3
23%
2.82
34%
3.6
16%
4.3
-0%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=717)
6%
Load Maximum *
5.96
6.4
-7%
5.6
6%
3.57
40%
5.4
9%
5.96
-0%
5.86 (1.2 - 14.2, n=717)
2%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 48.8min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
15h 17min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
5h 01min
Honor 8A
3020 mAh
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 7
4000 mAh
Huawei Y6 2019
3020 mAh
Wiko View 2 Go
4000 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
-21%
-4%
-14%
-11%
Reader / Idle
1489
H.264
917
902
-2%
805
-12%
WiFi v1.3
828.8
657
-21%
848
2%
732.1
-12%
734
-11%
Load
301
268
-11%
249
-17%

Points positifs

+ compact
+ performances
+ autonomie
+ logiciel à jour
+ lecteur d'empreintes digitales

Points négatifs

- micro USB
- non adapté pour les joueurs
En test : le Honor 8A.
En test : le Honor 8A.

Le Honor 7A était déjà assez bon, et le Honor 8A est encore meilleur. Le design divisera, mais c’est une question de goût. Si nous aurions préféré une allure plus premium, vu le prix du Honor 8A, cela n’est pas un problème. L’écran est correct et plus lumineux que sur le modèle de l’an dernier, le stockage a doublé, et les performances sont également en hausse.

Le Honor 8A est un smartphone d’entrée de gamme sans gros défaut. Vu leur prix presque identique, il fait même mieux que son concurrent maison, le Huawei Y6 (2019).

L’appareil photo suffira pour un certain nombre d’utilisateurs - pour avoir mieux, il faut payer plus. Le Honor 8A est ainsi un excellent smartphone d’entrée de gamme pour moins de 200 $. Le Y6 marron d’Huawei a peut-être plus belle allure, mais il n’a pas de lecteur d’empreintes digitales.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Honor 8A - 05/23/2019 v6
Stefan Schomberg

Châssis
76%
Clavier
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositif de pointage
78%
Connectivité
40 / 60 → 67%
Poids
92%
Autonomie
96%
Écran
83%
Performances en jeu
21 / 63 → 33%
Performances dans les applications
49 / 70 → 70%
Chauffe
94%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Appareil photo
47%
Moyenne
69%
79%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du smartphone Honor 8A
Stefan Schomberg, 2019-06- 3 (Update: 2019-06- 3)