Notebookcheck

Courte critique du smartphone Oukitel WP1

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger (traduit par Prévots), 01/07/2019

Robuste. L’Oukitel WP1 est un smartphone du milieu de gamme conçu pour une utilisation à l’extérieur. Il nous a surpris avec son prix de 150 €, vu ses composants, d’autant qu’il est étanche à l’eau et très robuste.

Oukitel WP1 (WP Gamme)
Processeur
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
Carte graphique
ARM Mali-G71 MP2
Mémoire
4096 Mo 
Écran
5.45 pouces 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixel 293 PPP, capacitif, IPS, brillant: oui
Disque dur
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 Go 
, 52 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: USB C, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD (testé avec une carte SD 64 Go) , 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: capteur de proximité, gyroscope, capteur de mouvement, boussole, charge sans-fil, OTG, Miracast, charge inversée
Réseau
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G GSM : 1 800 MHz, 1 900 MHz, 850 MHz, 900 MHz ; 3G WCDMA : 2 100 MHz, 1 900M Hz, 900 MHz ; 4G LTE : 2 100 MHz, 800 MHz, 1 800 MHz, 2 600 MHz, 900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 15.4 x 158.6 x 75.8
Batterie
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Android 8.1 Oreo
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 13 MPix 13+2 MP double capteur
Appareil photo secondaire: 5 MPix
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, adaptateur secteur modulaire, adaptateur USB C vers écouteurs 3,5 mm, câble USB OTG, Oukitel UI, 12 Mois Garantie, fanless, ruggedized
Poids
256 g, Alimentation: 58 g
Prix
150 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Oukitel WP1
Oukitel WP1

Comparaison des tailles

176 mm 84 mm 15 mm 364 g168.8 mm 85.6 mm 15.9 mm 334 g165 mm 77 mm 14.7 mm 298 g163 mm 76.6 mm 14 mm 256 g158.6 mm 75.8 mm 15.4 mm 256 g149.3 mm 71.7 mm 8.8 mm 178 g148.1 mm 72.9 mm 8.4 mm 155 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
685 (min: 657, max: 705) MBit/s ∼100% +622%
BQ Aquaris U2
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
248 MBit/s ∼36% +161%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 939, n=396)
219 MBit/s ∼32% +131%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
117 MBit/s ∼17% +23%
Blackview P10000 Pro
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
101 MBit/s ∼15% +6%
Ulefone Armor X
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
98.3 MBit/s ∼14% +4%
Oukitel WP1
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763V, 64 GB eMMC Flash
94.9 (min: 27, max: 108) MBit/s ∼14%
Oukitel WP2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
86.4 (min: 43, max: 107) MBit/s ∼13% -9%
Poptel P9000 Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 64 GB eMMC Flash
71.6 MBit/s ∼10% -25%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 507, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +497%
BQ Aquaris U2
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
251 MBit/s ∼38% +126%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=396)
210 MBit/s ∼32% +89%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
119 MBit/s ∼18% +7%
Oukitel WP1
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763V, 64 GB eMMC Flash
111 (min: 87, max: 129) MBit/s ∼17%
Blackview P10000 Pro
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
109 MBit/s ∼16% -2%
Ulefone Armor X
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
103 MBit/s ∼16% -7%
Oukitel WP2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
102 (min: 42, max: 118) MBit/s ∼15% -8%
Poptel P9000 Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 64 GB eMMC Flash
83.2 MBit/s ∼13% -25%
GPS Garmin Edge500
GPS Garmin Edge500
GPS Garmin Edge500
GPS Garmin Edge500
GPS Garmin Edge500
GPS Garmin Edge500
GPS Oukitel WP1
GPS Oukitel WP1
GPS Oukitel WP1
GPS Oukitel WP1
GPS Oukitel WP1
GPS Oukitel WP1
Oukitel WP1 - Mode photo.
Mode photo.
Oukitel WP1 - Mode SLR.
Mode SLR.
Oukitel WP1 - Mode photo.
Mode photo.
Oukitel WP1 - Mode SLR.
Mode SLR.
Oukitel WP1 - Image prise de jour.
Image prise de jour.
Oukitel WP1 - Image prise de nuit.
Image prise de nuit.
Oukitel WP1 - Image prise de nuit avec le flash LED.
Image prise de nuit avec le flash LED.
Oukitel WP1
Oukitel WP1
Oukitel WP1
Oukitel WP1
Oukitel WP1

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
485
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
555
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
580
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
553
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 580 cd/m² Moyenne: 537.3 cd/m² Minimum: 27.83 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 84 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 561 cd/m²
Contraste: 660:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.85 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
88.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.37
Oukitel WP1
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Oukitel WP2
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Ulefone Armor X
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Blackview P10000 Pro
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Poptel P9000 Max
LCD IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
LCD IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
BQ Aquaris U2
LCD IPS, 1280x720, 5.2
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen
-1%
29%
-2%
-2%
15%
14%
41%
Brightness middle
561
472
-16%
564
1%
513
-9%
406
-28%
554
-1%
392
-30%
599
7%
Brightness
537
456
-15%
541
1%
507
-6%
397
-26%
538
0%
390
-27%
593
10%
Brightness Distribution
84
86
2%
91
8%
89
6%
90
7%
91
8%
84
0%
96
14%
Black Level *
0.85
0.32
62%
0.37
56%
0.37
56%
0.38
55%
0.61
28%
0.37
56%
Contrast
660
1475
123%
1524
131%
1386
110%
1068
62%
908
38%
1059
60%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.4
9.1
-69%
5.1
6%
8.5
-57%
6.7
-24%
4.86
10%
4.88
10%
1.4
74%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.8
14.8
-25%
9.6
19%
15.2
-29%
13.8
-17%
8.46
28%
10.23
13%
3.2
73%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.8
9.6
-66%
5.4
7%
10.6
-83%
8.5
-47%
5.3
9%
3.9
33%
2
66%
Gamma
2.37 93%
1.75 126%
2.1 105%
2.29 96%
2.21 100%
2.281 96%
2.044 108%
2.25 98%
CCT
7567 86%
8713 75%
7755 84%
10204 64%
8858 73%
7770 84%
6819 95%
6496 100%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9533 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
33.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 16.8 ms hausse
↘ 16.4 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 86 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (25.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
48 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 21.2 ms hausse
↘ 26.8 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (40.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
2782 Points ∼21%
Oukitel WP2
1759 Points ∼13% -37%
Ulefone Armor X
1416 Points ∼11% -49%
Poptel P9000 Max
1758 Points ∼13% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
3644 Points ∼27% +31%
BQ Aquaris U2
1782 Points ∼13% -36%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
13374 Points ∼100% +381%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (2782 - 3293, n=5)
2977 Points ∼22% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=294)
4519 Points ∼34% +62%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
3594 Points ∼42%
Oukitel WP2
2633 Points ∼30% -27%
Ulefone Armor X
1847 Points ∼21% -49%
Poptel P9000 Max
2628 Points ∼30% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
4369 Points ∼51% +22%
BQ Aquaris U2
2407 Points ∼28% -33%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
8634 Points ∼100% +140%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (3594 - 4206, n=5)
3780 Points ∼44% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (1174 - 11598, n=348)
4470 Points ∼52% +24%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
829 Points ∼36%
Oukitel WP2
643 Points ∼28% -22%
Ulefone Armor X
662 Points ∼28% -20%
Poptel P9000 Max
616 Points ∼26% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
880 Points ∼38% +6%
BQ Aquaris U2
651 Points ∼28% -21%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
2333 Points ∼100% +181%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (788 - 912, n=5)
824 Points ∼35% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 4824, n=350)
1323 Points ∼57% +60%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
4780 Points ∼57%
Oukitel WP2
3042 Points ∼37% -36%
Ulefone Armor X
3184 Points ∼38% -33%
Blackview P10000 Pro
5054 Points ∼61% +6%
Poptel P9000 Max
3278 Points ∼39% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
4828 Points ∼58% +1%
BQ Aquaris U2
3744 Points ∼45% -22%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
8326 Points ∼100% +74%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (4693 - 4914, n=4)
4791 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3227 - 10450, n=342)
4921 Points ∼59% +3%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
6134 Points ∼61%
Oukitel WP2
4012 Points ∼40% -35%
Ulefone Armor X
4298 Points ∼43% -30%
Blackview P10000 Pro
6846 Points ∼68% +12%
Poptel P9000 Max
4609 Points ∼46% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
5716 Points ∼57% -7%
BQ Aquaris U2
4786 Points ∼48% -22%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
10052 Points ∼100% +64%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (5840 - 6478, n=5)
6092 Points ∼61% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (4290 - 14439, n=510)
5373 Points ∼53% -12%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
1674 Points ∼60%
Oukitel WP2
920 Points ∼33% -45%
Ulefone Armor X
645 Points ∼23% -61%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1123 Points ∼40% -33%
Poptel P9000 Max
1205 Points ∼43% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
1999 Points ∼71% +19%
BQ Aquaris U2
1266 Points ∼45% -24%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
2802 Points ∼100% +67%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (1455 - 1877, n=5)
1679 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 4535, n=357)
1811 Points ∼65% +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
380 Points ∼8%
Oukitel WP2
343 Points ∼8% -10%
Ulefone Armor X
102 Points ∼2% -73%
Blackview P10000 Pro
407 Points ∼9% +7%
Poptel P9000 Max
321 Points ∼7% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
442 Points ∼10% +16%
BQ Aquaris U2
307 Points ∼7% -19%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
4480 Points ∼100% +1079%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (380 - 419, n=5)
390 Points ∼9% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (76 - 8206, n=357)
1547 Points ∼35% +307%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
459 Points ∼12%
Oukitel WP2
399 Points ∼10% -13%
Ulefone Armor X
125 Points ∼3% -73%
Blackview P10000 Pro
473 Points ∼12% +3%
Poptel P9000 Max
384 Points ∼10% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
535 Points ∼14% +17%
BQ Aquaris U2
366 Points ∼10% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3846 Points ∼100% +738%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (457 - 504, n=5)
469 Points ∼12% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (94 - 6312, n=360)
1445 Points ∼38% +215%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
1681 Points ∼55%
Oukitel WP2
1072 Points ∼35% -36%
Ulefone Armor X
658 Points ∼22% -61%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1160 Points ∼38% -31%
Poptel P9000 Max
1178 Points ∼38% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
2023 Points ∼66% +20%
BQ Aquaris U2
1111 Points ∼36% -34%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3060 Points ∼100% +82%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (1473 - 1888, n=5)
1644 Points ∼54% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=373)
1784 Points ∼58% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
598 Points ∼7%
Oukitel WP2
491 Points ∼6% -18%
Ulefone Armor X
167 Points ∼2% -72%
Blackview P10000 Pro
617 Points ∼7% +3%
Poptel P9000 Max
477 Points ∼6% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
784 Points ∼10% +31%
BQ Aquaris U2
532 Points ∼6% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
8245 Points ∼100% +1279%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (598 - 654, n=5)
612 Points ∼7% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=373)
2132 Points ∼26% +257%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
698 Points ∼12%
Oukitel WP2
558 Points ∼9% -20%
Ulefone Armor X
200 Points ∼3% -71%
Blackview P10000 Pro
688 Points ∼11% -1%
Poptel P9000 Max
550 Points ∼9% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
885 Points ∼15% +27%
BQ Aquaris U2
602 Points ∼10% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
6054 Points ∼100% +767%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (690 - 765, n=5)
711 Points ∼12% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7980, n=374)
1815 Points ∼30% +160%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
1580 Points ∼60%
Oukitel WP2
1054 Points ∼40% -33%
Ulefone Armor X
585 Points ∼22% -63%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1469 Points ∼55% -7%
Poptel P9000 Max
1118 Points ∼42% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
2104 Points ∼79% +33%
BQ Aquaris U2
1150 Points ∼43% -27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
2653 Points ∼100% +68%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (1374 - 1778, n=5)
1587 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (486 - 4262, n=433)
1740 Points ∼66% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
369 Points ∼9%
Oukitel WP2
149 Points ∼4% -60%
Ulefone Armor X
87 Points ∼2% -76%
Blackview P10000 Pro
53 Points ∼1% -86%
Poptel P9000 Max
322 Points ∼8% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
392 Points ∼9% +6%
BQ Aquaris U2
262 Points ∼6% -29%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
4223 Points ∼100% +1044%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (364 - 402, n=5)
378 Points ∼9% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (65 - 6362, n=435)
1278 Points ∼30% +246%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
445 Points ∼12%
Oukitel WP2
184 Points ∼5% -59%
Ulefone Armor X
107 Points ∼3% -76%
Blackview P10000 Pro
68 Points ∼2% -85%
Poptel P9000 Max
383 Points ∼10% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
479 Points ∼13% +8%
BQ Aquaris U2
316 Points ∼9% -29%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3677 Points ∼100% +726%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (439 - 486, n=5)
451 Points ∼12% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5734, n=443)
1224 Points ∼33% +175%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
1551 Points ∼48%
Oukitel WP2
1126 Points ∼35% -27%
Ulefone Armor X
581 Points ∼18% -63%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1456 Points ∼45% -6%
Poptel P9000 Max
1176 Points ∼37% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
2098 Points ∼65% +35%
BQ Aquaris U2
1174 Points ∼36% -24%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3221 Points ∼100% +108%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (1365 - 1774, n=5)
1570 Points ∼49% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 4240, n=467)
1646 Points ∼51% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
575 Points ∼7%
Oukitel WP2
98 Points ∼1% -83%
Ulefone Armor X
129 Points ∼2% -78%
Blackview P10000 Pro
55 Points ∼1% -90%
Poptel P9000 Max
480 Points ∼6% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
743 Points ∼9% +29%
BQ Aquaris U2
534 Points ∼6% -7%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
8236 Points ∼100% +1332%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (575 - 623, n=5)
589 Points ∼7% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 10008, n=467)
1743 Points ∼21% +203%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
668 Points ∼11%
Oukitel WP2
123 Points ∼2% -82%
Ulefone Armor X
156 Points ∼3% -77%
Blackview P10000 Pro
71 Points ∼1% -89%
Poptel P9000 Max
553 Points ∼9% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
867 Points ∼14% +30%
BQ Aquaris U2
608 Points ∼10% -9%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
6118 Points ∼100% +816%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (654 - 728, n=5)
680 Points ∼11% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 7673, n=475)
1496 Points ∼24% +124%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
10654 Points ∼30%
Oukitel WP2
8284 Points ∼23% -22%
Ulefone Armor X
10195 Points ∼28% -4%
Blackview P10000 Pro
7733 Points ∼21% -27%
Poptel P9000 Max
10560 Points ∼29% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
15870 Points ∼44% +49%
BQ Aquaris U2
9004 Points ∼25% -15%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
35987 Points ∼100% +238%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (10234 - 12577, n=5)
10817 Points ∼30% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (8253 - 45072, n=626)
13505 Points ∼38% +27%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
10820 Points ∼13%
Oukitel WP2
8830 Points ∼11% -18%
Ulefone Armor X
3585 Points ∼4% -67%
Blackview P10000 Pro
10997 Points ∼13% +2%
Poptel P9000 Max
10012 Points ∼12% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
13369 Points ∼16% +24%
BQ Aquaris U2
10261 Points ∼12% -5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
83976 Points ∼100% +676%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (1152 - 12065, n=5)
9184 Points ∼11% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (3585 - 162695, n=626)
19454 Points ∼23% +80%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
10775 Points ∼17%
Oukitel WP2
8703 Points ∼13% -19%
Ulefone Armor X
4188 Points ∼6% -61%
Blackview P10000 Pro
10054 Points ∼16% -7%
Poptel P9000 Max
10129 Points ∼16% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
13847 Points ∼21% +29%
BQ Aquaris U2
9952 Points ∼15% -8%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
64627 Points ∼100% +500%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (10772 - 12134, n=5)
11091 Points ∼17% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (4164 - 83518, n=627)
16275 Points ∼25% +51%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
21 fps ∼14%
Oukitel WP2
17 fps ∼11% -19%
Ulefone Armor X
5.9 fps ∼4% -72%
Blackview P10000 Pro
21 fps ∼14% 0%
Poptel P9000 Max
17 fps ∼11% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
23 fps ∼15% +10%
BQ Aquaris U2
25 fps ∼16% +19%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
152 fps ∼100% +624%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (21 - 24, n=5)
22 fps ∼14% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 251, n=652)
34 fps ∼22% +62%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
34 fps ∼57%
Oukitel WP2
15 fps ∼25% -56%
Ulefone Armor X
9.2 fps ∼15% -73%
Blackview P10000 Pro
20 fps ∼33% -41%
Poptel P9000 Max
16 fps ∼27% -53%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
21 fps ∼35% -38%
BQ Aquaris U2
18 fps ∼30% -47%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
60 fps ∼100% +76%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (21 - 35, n=5)
27 fps ∼45% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 120, n=655)
26.4 fps ∼44% -22%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
10 fps ∼12%
Oukitel WP2
7.1 fps ∼9% -29%
Ulefone Armor X
2.7 fps ∼3% -73%
Blackview P10000 Pro
11 fps ∼14% +10%
Poptel P9000 Max
6.8 fps ∼8% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
9.9 fps ∼12% -1%
BQ Aquaris U2
15 fps ∼19% +50%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
81 fps ∼100% +710%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (10 - 11, n=5)
10.4 fps ∼13% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2.7 - 132, n=571)
18.6 fps ∼23% +86%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
20 fps ∼36%
Oukitel WP2
6.7 fps ∼12% -66%
Ulefone Armor X
5.1 fps ∼9% -74%
Blackview P10000 Pro
10 fps ∼18% -50%
Poptel P9000 Max
6.8 fps ∼12% -66%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
9.4 fps ∼17% -53%
BQ Aquaris U2
7.6 fps ∼14% -62%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
56 fps ∼100% +180%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (9.7 - 20, n=5)
14.1 fps ∼25% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (5.4 - 115, n=576)
17.3 fps ∼31% -13%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
6.6 fps ∼11%
Ulefone Armor X
1.6 fps ∼3% -76%
Blackview P10000 Pro
6.9 fps ∼12% +5%
Poptel P9000 Max
4.5 fps ∼8% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
6.5 fps ∼11% -2%
BQ Aquaris U2
4.9 fps ∼8% -26%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
59 fps ∼100% +794%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (6.6 - 7.2, n=5)
6.72 fps ∼11% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88, n=433)
15.5 fps ∼26% +135%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
14 fps ∼28%
Oukitel WP2
4.5 fps ∼9% -68%
Ulefone Armor X
3.3 fps ∼7% -76%
Blackview P10000 Pro
7.1 fps ∼14% -49%
Poptel P9000 Max
4.6 fps ∼9% -67%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
6.1 fps ∼12% -56%
BQ Aquaris U2
11 fps ∼22% -21%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
50 fps ∼100% +257%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (6.1 - 14, n=5)
9.46 fps ∼19% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 110, n=436)
14.8 fps ∼30% +6%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
3.7 fps ∼19%
Oukitel WP2
1.3 fps ∼7% -65%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
20 fps ∼100% +441%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (1.4 - 3.7, n=5)
2.48 fps ∼12% -33%
Average of class Smartphone (0.86 - 59, n=137)
8.81 fps ∼44% +138%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
1.4 fps ∼5%
Oukitel WP2
0.86 fps ∼3% -39%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
31 fps ∼100% +2114%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (1.4 - 2.4, n=5)
1.76 fps ∼6% +26%
Average of class Smartphone (0.26 - 31, n=137)
6.06 fps ∼20% +333%
Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
6.4 fps ∼32%
Oukitel WP2
2 fps ∼10% -69%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
20 fps ∼100% +213%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (3.5 - 6.4, n=5)
4.6 fps ∼23% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (1.8 - 59, n=138)
13.2 fps ∼66% +106%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
3.8 fps ∼13%
Oukitel WP2
2.3 fps ∼8% -39%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
30 fps ∼100% +689%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (3.8 - 4.2, n=5)
3.88 fps ∼13% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.94 - 63, n=137)
14.6 fps ∼49% +284%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
3.8 fps ∼11%
Oukitel WP2
2.5 fps ∼7% -34%
Ulefone Armor X
0.9 fps ∼3% -76%
Blackview P10000 Pro
4 fps ∼11% +5%
Poptel P9000 Max
2.4 fps ∼7% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
3.5 fps ∼10% -8%
BQ Aquaris U2
2.4 fps ∼7% -37%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
35 fps ∼100% +821%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (3.8 - 4.2, n=5)
3.9 fps ∼11% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.89 - 54, n=362)
10.4 fps ∼30% +174%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
7.5 fps ∼25%
Oukitel WP2
2.4 fps ∼8% -68%
Ulefone Armor X
1.6 fps ∼5% -79%
Blackview P10000 Pro
4.1 fps ∼14% -45%
Poptel P9000 Max
2.4 fps ∼8% -68%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
3.6 fps ∼12% -52%
BQ Aquaris U2
5.6 fps ∼19% -25%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
30 fps ∼100% +300%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (3.6 - 7.8, n=5)
5.36 fps ∼18% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 58, n=366)
9.39 fps ∼31% +25%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
84267 Points ∼29%
Oukitel WP2
51621 Points ∼18% -39%
Ulefone Armor X
46435 Points ∼16% -45%
Blackview P10000 Pro
73697 Points ∼25% -13%
Poptel P9000 Max
54819 Points ∼19% -35%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
79099 Points ∼27% -6%
BQ Aquaris U2
56672 Points ∼19% -33%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
292798 Points ∼100% +247%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (83745 - 94789, n=5)
86177 Points ∼29% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (63421 - 374820, n=254)
126932 Points ∼43% +51%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
62814 Points ∼28%
Oukitel WP2
42273 Points ∼19% -33%
Ulefone Armor X
37586 Points ∼16% -40%
Blackview P10000 Pro
59656 Points ∼26% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
68348 Points ∼30% +9%
BQ Aquaris U2
44219 Points ∼19% -30%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
228173 Points ∼100% +263%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (62732 - 73075, n=4)
65703 Points ∼29% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 274007, n=460)
83838 Points ∼37% +33%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
756 Points ∼55%
Oukitel WP2
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Ulefone Armor X
7 Points ∼1% -99%
Blackview P10000 Pro
771 Points ∼56% +2%
Poptel P9000 Max
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
753 Points ∼54% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
1386 Points ∼100% +83%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (10 - 762, n=5)
455 Points ∼33% -40%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=584)
732 Points ∼53% -3%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
859 Points ∼11%
Oukitel WP2
642 Points ∼8% -25%
Ulefone Armor X
188 Points ∼2% -78%
Blackview P10000 Pro
931 Points ∼12% +8%
Poptel P9000 Max
641 Points ∼8% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
999 Points ∼13% +16%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
7891 Points ∼100% +819%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (859 - 949, n=5)
883 Points ∼11% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=584)
1885 Points ∼24% +119%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
1246 Points ∼33%
Oukitel WP2
926 Points ∼24% -26%
Ulefone Armor X
900 Points ∼24% -28%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1596 Points ∼42% +28%
Poptel P9000 Max
779 Points ∼21% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
996 Points ∼26% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3791 Points ∼100% +204%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (1136 - 1403, n=5)
1266 Points ∼33% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=584)
1407 Points ∼37% +13%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
2662 Points ∼33%
Oukitel WP2
1330 Points ∼16% -50%
Ulefone Armor X
1491 Points ∼18% -44%
Blackview P10000 Pro
3229 Points ∼40% +21%
Poptel P9000 Max
1868 Points ∼23% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
3154 Points ∼39% +18%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
8146 Points ∼100% +206%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (2363 - 3290, n=5)
2651 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=584)
2790 Points ∼34% +5%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oukitel WP1
1214 Points ∼28%
Oukitel WP2
295 Points ∼7% -76%
Ulefone Armor X
206 Points ∼5% -83%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1370 Points ∼32% +13%
Poptel P9000 Max
308 Points ∼7% -75%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
1170 Points ∼27% -4%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
4287 Points ∼100% +253%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (384 - 1214, n=5)
887 Points ∼21% -27%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=588)
1384 Points ∼32% +14%

Légende

 
Oukitel WP1 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Oukitel WP2 Mediatek MT6750T, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Armor X Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview P10000 Pro Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Poptel P9000 Max Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris U2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
85.976 Points ∼100% +274%
Average of class Smartphone (17.6 - 273, n=491)
38.2 Points ∼44% +66%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)
25.787 Points ∼30% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (22 - 25.9, n=5)
23.1 Points ∼27% +1%
Oukitel WP1 (Chrome 70)
22.984 Points ∼27%
Poptel P9000 Max (Chrome 68)
18.86 Points ∼22% -18%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
18.148 Points ∼21% -21%
BQ Aquaris U2 (Chrome 67)
17.895 Points ∼21% -22%
Blackview P10000 Pro (Chrome 66)
17.876 Points ∼21% -22%
Oukitel WP2 (Chroome Mobile 70)
15.734 Points ∼18% -32%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
16489 Points ∼100% +286%
Average of class Smartphone (3126 - 43280, n=646)
6099 Points ∼37% +43%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)
4808 Points ∼29% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (3998 - 4862, n=5)
4321 Points ∼26% +1%
Oukitel WP1 (Chrome 70)
4274 Points ∼26%
Blackview P10000 Pro (Chrome 66)
3443 Points ∼21% -19%
Poptel P9000 Max (Chrome 68)
3441 Points ∼21% -19%
BQ Aquaris U2 (Chrome 67)
3314 Points ∼20% -22%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
3151 Points ∼19% -26%
Oukitel WP2 (Chrome Mobile 70)
3082 Points ∼19% -28%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
15875.7 ms * ∼100% -33%
Oukitel WP2 (Chrome Mobile 70)
13902.5 ms * ∼88% -16%
Oukitel WP2 (Chrome Mobile 70)
13902.5 ms * ∼88% -16%
Poptel P9000 Max (Chrome 68)
13879.9 ms * ∼87% -16%
BQ Aquaris U2 (Chrome 67)
13564 ms * ∼85% -14%
Blackview P10000 Pro (Chrome 66)
12786.8 ms * ∼81% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (11309 - 13077, n=5)
12230 ms * ∼77% -2%
Oukitel WP1 (Chrome 70)
11939.4 ms * ∼75%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=665)
10916 ms * ∼69% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)
9879.9 ms * ∼62% +17%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
2299.9 ms * ∼14% +81%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Oukitel WP1Oukitel WP2Ulefone Armor XBlackview P10000 ProPoptel P9000 MaxXiaomi Redmi 6 ProBQ Aquaris U2Xiaomi Mi Mix 3Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-34%
-36%
-23%
-30%
38%
-26%
56%
-10%
-28%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
72.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
47.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-34%
62.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
73.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
53.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-27%
62.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-15%
61.62 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-15%
56.1 (58.4 - 74.7, n=97)
-23%
48.3 (9.5 - 87.1, n=391)
-34%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
72.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
81.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
80.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
72.89 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-10%
83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
79.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
74.1 (76.1 - 87.2, n=97)
-9%
66.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=391)
-18%
Random Write 4KB
20.83
13.23
-36%
10.17
-51%
14.6
-30%
11.23
-46%
72.6
249%
8.87
-57%
19.54
-6%
24.5 (3.4 - 88.2, n=107)
18%
19.2 (0.14 - 250, n=695)
-8%
Random Read 4KB
64.23
26.89
-58%
14.7
-77%
29.98
-53%
35.1
-45%
66.87
4%
46.87
-27%
133.24
107%
54.3 (11.4 - 149, n=107)
-15%
43.8 (1.59 - 175, n=695)
-32%
Sequential Write 256KB
241.34
98.58
-59%
82.85
-66%
112.3
-53%
129.64
-46%
212.87
-12%
137.7
-43%
206.76
-14%
172 (40 - 246, n=107)
-29%
90.1 (2.99 - 392, n=695)
-63%
Sequential Read 256KB
284.98
267.61
-6%
255.34
-10%
284.33
0%
269.44
-5%
278.66
-2%
253.5
-11%
674.98
137%
274 (115 - 704, n=107)
-4%
254 (12.1 - 1468, n=695)
-11%
 35.1 °C35.1 °C38.7 °C 
 33.5 °C33.7 °C38.3 °C 
 33.5 °C33.1 °C38.4 °C 
Maximum: 38.7 °C
Moyenne: 35.5 °C
30.9 °C31.5 °C32 °C
30.5 °C31.6 °C32.1 °C
30.3 °C31.1 °C32.2 °C
Maximum: 32.2 °C
Moyenne: 31.4 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  28.3 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.835.92524.3303118.628.84024.329.35033.8396321.230.68024.83410018.537.412516.434.916017.140.520017.942.625016.848.731514.954.340015.159.650014.26363013.966.880014.870.4100014.275.8125014.781.1160014.483.4200014.383.625001483.8315013.883.9400014.884.3500014.479.363001565.7800014.764.21000014.863.51250014.855.31600014.745.1SPL26.792.9N0.883.4median 14.8median 64.2Delta0.615.333.933.728.435.736.129.630.933.430.631.822.225.124.92324.425.823.52320.320.319.825.518.228.317.439.616.650.117.155.915.963.815.971.715.971.716.772.61672.815.968.416.269.716.469.71771.816.572.316.477.516.681.21774.516.561.116.956.928.685.51.160.4median 16.6median 68.41.614.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOukitel WP1Poptel P9000 Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oukitel WP1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Poptel P9000 Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 41.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.15 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.77 / 1.98 / 1.99 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 3.89 / 4.78 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oukitel WP1
5000 mAh
Oukitel WP2
10214 mAh
Ulefone Armor X
5500 mAh
Blackview P10000 Pro
11000 mAh
Poptel P9000 Max
9000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
4000 mAh
BQ Aquaris U2
3100 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3200 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-14%
-22%
-5%
6%
-41%
6%
15%
-2%
-6%
Idle Minimum *
0.77
1.14
-48%
1.22
-58%
0.63
18%
0.92
-19%
1.3
-69%
0.8
-4%
0.49
36%
0.838 (0.7 - 1.01, n=5)
-9%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=724)
-14%
Idle Average *
1.98
1.99
-1%
2.07
-5%
2.2
-11%
1.9
4%
2.1
-6%
1.4
29%
0.67
66%
1.982 (1.2 - 2.59, n=5)
-0%
1.737 (0.6 - 6.2, n=723)
12%
Idle Maximum *
1.99
2.03
-2%
2.14
-8%
2.3
-16%
2.19
-10%
3.7
-86%
1.9
5%
0.87
56%
2.31 (1.99 - 2.62, n=5)
-16%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=724)
-2%
Load Average *
3.89
3.72
4%
4.92
-26%
3.57
8%
3.1
20%
4.5
-16%
3.4
13%
3.64
6%
3.39 (3.02 - 3.89, n=5)
13%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=718)
-4%
Load Maximum *
4.78
5.96
-25%
5.4
-13%
5.82
-22%
3.12
35%
6
-26%
5.3
-11%
9.04
-89%
4.58 (4.01 - 5, n=5)
4%
5.86 (1.2 - 14.2, n=718)
-23%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16h 11min
Oukitel WP1
5000 mAh
Oukitel WP2
10214 mAh
Ulefone Armor X
5500 mAh
Blackview P10000 Pro
11000 mAh
Poptel P9000 Max
9000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
4000 mAh
BQ Aquaris U2
3100 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3200 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3
971
1146
18%
845
-13%
2149
121%
1346
39%
868
-11%
686
-29%
719
-26%

Points positifs

+ châssis robuste
+ écran IPS lumineux
+ certifié IP
+ autonomie
+ charge inversée
+ performances...

Points négatifs

- ...grâce à la résolution 720p
- poids
- touché
- haut-parleur
- appareil photo secondaire ne fonctionne pas
- patch de sécurité dépassé
En test : l'Oukitel WP1. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Oukitel.
En test : l'Oukitel WP1. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Oukitel.

Durant nos tests, l’Oukitel WP1 a révélé des défauts plutôt gênants, comme un contraste faible de l’écran IPS, des patchs de sécurité datés, un haut-parleur faiblard, et un appareil photo arrière qui ne fonctionne pas. Néanmoins, le smartphone chinois s’avère être un appareil plutôt équilibré pour ceux qui ont besoin d’un appareil baroudeur. Il nous a impressionné avec son faible prix et ses bons composants. De plus, l’Oukitel WP1 obtient de bons résultats dans les domaines importants pour un smartphone durci.

L’Oukitel WP1 a tout à fait sa place dans le monde des téléphones durcis - mais ceux qui n’ont pas besoin d’un téléphone aussi robuste feront mieux de regarder du côté des smartphones plus faciles à prendre en main et plus puissants, dans la même gamme de prix de 150 €.

Ceux qui peuvent supporter la résolution HD de l’Oukitel WP1 auront un appareil qui possède de bonnes performances, et qui peut même faire tourner les jeux exigeants, grâce à sa faible densité de pixels.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Oukitel WP1 - 01/02/2019 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Châssis
82%
Clavier
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositif de pointage
84%
Connectivité
38 / 60 → 63%
Poids
87%
Autonomie
100%
Écran
81%
Performances en jeu
30 / 63 → 48%
Performances dans les applications
50 / 70 → 72%
Chauffe
90%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
58 / 91 → 64%
Appareil photo
57%
Moyenne
71%
80%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du smartphone Oukitel WP1
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-01- 7 (Update: 2019-01- 7)