Notebookcheck

Test du Motorola Moto E6 Plus : le meilleur de l'autonomie, le pire des performances

Inge Schwabe, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduit par Prévots), 11/05/2019

Remplaçable. Le Moto E6 Plus suit les One Vision, One Action et One Zoom du milieu de gamme, arrivant dans les rayons juste avant Noël. Cependant, alors que Motorola vise une audience jeune avec la série One, le E6 Plus vise à séduire les plus âgés avec sa batterie amovible. L’appareil doit assurer face à l’excellente autonomie du Moto E5 Plus – mais son prédécesseur avait des défauts. Lisez ce rapport de test pour voir si Motorola a réussi à se débarrasser de ces défauts avec ce nouvel appareil, et ce que le Moto E6 Plus propose.

Motorola Moto E6 Plus (Moto E Gamme)
Processeur
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
Carte graphique
PowerVR GE8320
Mémoire
2048 Mo 
, version 4 Go disponible
Écran
6.1 pouces 19.5:9, 1560 x 720 pixel 282 PPP, capacitif, IPS, brillant: oui
Disque dur
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 Go 
, 25.71 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD (max. 512GB, FAT, FAT32), 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, capteur de proximité, lecteur d'empreintes digitales, Micro USB
Réseau
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM : bandes 2, 3, 5, 8. UMTS : bandes 1, 2, 5, 8. LTE : bandes 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.6 x 155.6 x 73.06
Batterie
3000 mAh Lithium-Polymère, Amovible
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 13 MPix f/2,0, 1 / 3.1", 1,12 μm, AF. 2 MP capteur de profondeur de champ, flash LED, appareil photo2 niveau d'API : Full
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix f/2,0 1,12 μm
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, chargeur, micro câble USB, manual, coque de protection, Google Assistant, 24 Mois Garantie, DAS : 0,448 W/kg, certifié IP52, radio FM, GNSS : GPS, AGPS, GLONASS, Galileo, fanless
Poids
149.7 g, Alimentation: 60.55 g
Prix
139 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Aperçu

NoteDateModèlePoidsDriveTailleRésolutionBest Price
75%11/19Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
149.7 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.1"1560x720
79%11/18Motorola Moto E5 Plus
425, Adreno 308
197 g32 GB eMMC Flash6"1440x720
08/19Motorola Moto E6
435, Adreno 505
159 g16 GB eMMC Flash5.5"1440x720
82%06/19LG K40
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
145 g32 GB eMMC Flash5.7"1440x720
83%04/19Sony Xperia L3
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
156 g32 GB eMMC Flash5.7"1440x720
74%10/19TP-Link Neffos X20
Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300
171 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.26"1520x720
78%09/19Xiaomi Mi A3
665, Adreno 610
173.8 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.09"1560x720
Moto E6 Plus
Moto E6 Plus
Moto E6 Plus
Moto E6 Plus
Notre modèle avec la coque arrière enlevée.
Notre modèle avec la coque arrière enlevée.

Comparaison des tailles

160.9 mm 75.3 mm 9.4 mm 197 g159.7 mm 77.3 mm 8.55 mm 171 g155.6 mm 73.06 mm 8.6 mm 149.7 g154 mm 72 mm 8.9 mm 156 g153.5 mm 71.9 mm 8.5 mm 173.8 g153 mm 71.9 mm 8.3 mm 145 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
TP-Link Neffos X20
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
342 (min: 323, max: 348) MBit/s ∼100% +403%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=451)
229 MBit/s ∼67% +237%
LG K40
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
221 (min: 107, max: 246) MBit/s ∼65% +225%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
158 (min: 18, max: 227) MBit/s ∼46% +132%
Sony Xperia L3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
128 (min: 81, max: 129) MBit/s ∼37% +88%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
68 (min: 52, max: 77) MBit/s ∼20%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Adreno 308, 425, 32 GB eMMC Flash
43.2 (min: 36, max: 52) MBit/s ∼13% -36%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
TP-Link Neffos X20
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
275 (min: 213, max: 287) MBit/s ∼100% +490%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=451)
217 MBit/s ∼79% +366%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
172 (min: 2, max: 282) MBit/s ∼63% +269%
Sony Xperia L3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 (min: 90, max: 111) MBit/s ∼37% +119%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46.6 (min: 36, max: 55) MBit/s ∼17%
LG K40
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39.6 (min: 10, max: 54) MBit/s ∼14% -15%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Adreno 308, 425, 32 GB eMMC Flash
35.4 (min: 23, max: 51) MBit/s ∼13% -24%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290Tooltip
Motorola Moto E6 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø63.4 (52-77)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø125 (81-129)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø158 (18-227)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø46.5 (36-55)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø102 (90-111)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø172 (2-282)
GPS Motorola Moto E6 Plus : vue générale.
GPS Motorola Moto E6 Plus : vue générale.
GPS Motorola Moto E6 Plus : autour d'un lac.
GPS Motorola Moto E6 Plus : autour d'un lac.
GPS Motorola Moto E6 Plus - Une boucle en zone résidentielle.
GPS Motorola Moto E6 Plus - Une boucle en zone résidentielle.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : autour d'un lac.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : autour d'un lac.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Une boucle en zone résidentielle.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Une boucle en zone résidentielle.
Photo normale.
Photo normale.
Arrière-plan flou.
Arrière-plan flou.
Arrière-plan flou.
Arrière-plan flou.
Arrière-plan flou.
Un selfie en mode portrait.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker Photo
29.6 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
62 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
28 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
63.5 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
76.2 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto E6 Plus: 46.71 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 92.92 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
10.6 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
13 ∆E
12 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto E6 Plus: 8.1 ∆E min: 2.3 - max: 12.97 ∆E
Moto E6 Plus - Mire de test.
Moto E6 Plus - Mire de test.
Moto E6 Plus - Détail de la mire de test.
Moto E6 Plus - Mire de test à 1 lux.
Moto E6 Plus - ColorChecker Passport : la couleur de référence se situe dans la partie inférieure de chaque bloc.
427
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 465 cd/m² Moyenne: 439.6 cd/m² Minimum: 9.56 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 86 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 453 cd/m²
Contraste: 3236:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.14 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 8.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
93.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.95
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
IPS, 1560x720, 6.1
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
IPS, 1440x720, 6
LG K40
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Sony Xperia L3
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
TP-Link Neffos X20
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Xiaomi Mi A3
AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.09
Screen
-57%
-18%
16%
-23%
3%
Brightness middle
453
518
14%
475
5%
533
18%
470
4%
348
-23%
Brightness
440
481
9%
467
6%
533
21%
455
3%
355
-19%
Brightness Distribution
86
87
1%
90
5%
89
3%
93
8%
91
6%
Black Level *
0.14
0.85
-507%
0.32
-129%
0.25
-79%
0.41
-193%
Contrast
3236
609
-81%
1484
-54%
2132
-34%
1146
-65%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.2
4.47
38%
5.95
17%
2.8
61%
6
17%
5.86
19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.7
8.04
37%
12.62
1%
5.1
60%
10.1
20%
15.6
-23%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8.4
5.4
36%
7.9
6%
1.9
77%
6.3
25%
3.6
57%
Gamma
1.95 113%
2.318 95%
2.331 94%
2.11 104%
2.06 107%
2.232 99%
CCT
8296 78%
7134 91%
8202 79%
6149 106%
8064 81%
7051 92%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9276 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
26 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 12.8 ms hausse
↘ 13.2 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (24.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
53.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 29.2 ms hausse
↘ 24.4 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (39.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2166 Points ∼42%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
1380 Points ∼27% -36%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2638 Points ∼51% +22%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5144 Points ∼100% +137%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (2166 - 3015, n=6)
2664 Points ∼52% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=325)
4691 Points ∼91% +117%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3369 Points ∼59%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
883 Points ∼16% -74%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3375 Points ∼60% 0%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5663 Points ∼100% +68%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3300 - 3660, n=7)
3468 Points ∼61% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=384)
4726 Points ∼83% +40%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
780 Points ∼51%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
541 Points ∼35% -31%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
758 Points ∼49% -3%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1536 Points ∼100% +97%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (749 - 824, n=7)
778 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=384)
1426 Points ∼93% +83%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
5237 Points ∼82%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
2829 Points ∼44% -46%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3805 Points ∼59% -27%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4912 Points ∼77% -6%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4777 Points ∼75% -9%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6396 Points ∼100% +22%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3805 - 5237, n=9)
4644 Points ∼73% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=388)
5333 Points ∼83% +2%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6922 Points ∼87%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
3681 Points ∼46% -47%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4404 Points ∼55% -36%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6385 Points ∼80% -8%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7984 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4404 - 6922, n=9)
5891 Points ∼74% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14946, n=556)
5785 Points ∼72% -16%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
Points ∼0%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2300 Points ∼86%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
 
2149 Points ∼80%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=68)
2676 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
Points ∼0%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
908 Points ∼33%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
 
341 Points ∼13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=68)
2721 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
Points ∼0%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1049 Points ∼42%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
 
419 Points ∼17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=68)
2478 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1183 Points ∼50%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
912 Points ∼38% -23%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
980 Points ∼41% -17%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
787 Points ∼33% -33%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2387 Points ∼100% +102%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (912 - 1183, n=8)
992 Points ∼42% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4683, n=396)
1981 Points ∼83% +67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
449 Points ∼25%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
431 Points ∼24% -4%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
391 Points ∼22% -13%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
253 Points ∼14% -44%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
987 Points ∼55% +120%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (376 - 449, n=8)
420 Points ∼24% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=396)
1787 Points ∼100% +298%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
521 Points ∼31%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
488 Points ∼29% -6%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
451 Points ∼27% -13%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
298 Points ∼18% -43%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1135 Points ∼68% +118%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (435 - 521, n=8)
481 Points ∼29% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=397)
1658 Points ∼100% +218%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1195 Points ∼51%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
375 Points ∼16% -69%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
912 Points ∼39% -24%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
987 Points ∼42% -17%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
798 Points ∼34% -33%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2343 Points ∼100% +96%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (900 - 1195, n=9)
987 Points ∼42% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=424)
1893 Points ∼81% +58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
740 Points ∼31%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
248 Points ∼10% -66%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
695 Points ∼29% -6%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
663 Points ∼28% -10%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
458 Points ∼19% -38%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1674 Points ∼70% +126%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (452 - 740, n=9)
665 Points ∼28% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=424)
2386 Points ∼100% +222%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
808 Points ∼40%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
268 Points ∼13% -67%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
734 Points ∼37% -9%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
715 Points ∼36% -12%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
506 Points ∼25% -37%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1787 Points ∼89% +121%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (513 - 808, n=9)
715 Points ∼36% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=424)
2004 Points ∼100% +148%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1130 Points ∼46%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
881 Points ∼36% -22%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
998 Points ∼40% -12%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
777 Points ∼31% -31%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2477 Points ∼100% +119%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (860 - 1130, n=8)
971 Points ∼39% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4519, n=476)
1888 Points ∼76% +67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
392 Points ∼27%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
303 Points ∼21% -23%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
378 Points ∼26% -4%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
216 Points ∼15% -45%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
931 Points ∼63% +138%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (257 - 392, n=8)
328 Points ∼22% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=476)
1478 Points ∼100% +277%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
459 Points ∼32%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
355 Points ∼25% -23%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
439 Points ∼31% -4%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
257 Points ∼18% -44%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1081 Points ∼76% +136%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (305 - 459, n=8)
385 Points ∼27% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=477)
1423 Points ∼100% +210%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1139 Points ∼46%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
851 Points ∼34% -25%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
912 Points ∼37% -20%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1026 Points ∼42% -10%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
769 Points ∼31% -32%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2471 Points ∼100% +117%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (854 - 1139, n=9)
979 Points ∼40% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4540, n=516)
1754 Points ∼71% +54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
645 Points ∼33%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
55 Points ∼3% -91%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
512 Points ∼26% -21%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
624 Points ∼32% -3%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
414 Points ∼21% -36%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1651 Points ∼85% +156%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (370 - 645, n=9)
523 Points ∼27% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=515)
1936 Points ∼100% +200%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
714 Points ∼40%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
69 Points ∼4% -90%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
567 Points ∼32% -21%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
684 Points ∼38% -4%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
461 Points ∼26% -35%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1782 Points ∼100% +150%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (428 - 714, n=9)
582 Points ∼33% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8165, n=518)
1674 Points ∼94% +134%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
15069 Points ∼77%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
3958 Points ∼20% -74%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11443 Points ∼59% -24%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11696 Points ∼60% -22%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
13609 Points ∼70% -10%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19552 Points ∼100% +30%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9674 - 15069, n=9)
11940 Points ∼61% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=676)
14217 Points ∼73% -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11349 Points ∼45%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
5480 Points ∼22% -52%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
10531 Points ∼42% -7%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10008 Points ∼40% -12%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7609 Points ∼30% -33%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25219 Points ∼100% +122%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9536 - 11349, n=9)
10461 Points ∼41% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=674)
22183 Points ∼88% +95%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11921 Points ∼50%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
5049 Points ∼21% -58%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
10721 Points ∼45% -10%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10340 Points ∼44% -13%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
8435 Points ∼36% -29%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23693 Points ∼100% +99%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9835 - 11921, n=9)
10713 Points ∼45% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=674)
17924 Points ∼76% +50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
19 fps ∼50%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
7.7 fps ∼20% -59%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
19 fps ∼50% 0%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
14 fps ∼37% -26%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼94% +89%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (17 - 20, n=8)
19 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=694)
38.1 fps ∼100% +101%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
26 fps ∼50%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
13 fps ∼25% -50%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
26 fps ∼50% 0%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
20 fps ∼38% -23%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
52 fps ∼100% +100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (24 - 27, n=8)
26 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=703)
28.1 fps ∼54% +8%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
9.6 fps ∼44%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
2.8 fps ∼13% -71%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
9.7 fps ∼44% +1%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
6.6 fps ∼30% -31%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps ∼91% +108%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9.1 - 10, n=8)
9.64 fps ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=600)
21.9 fps ∼100% +128%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
16 fps ∼47%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
5.6 fps ∼16% -65%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
16 fps ∼47% 0%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
12 fps ∼35% -25%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps ∼100% +113%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (15 - 17, n=8)
16.5 fps ∼49% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=609)
19.4 fps ∼57% +21%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.1 fps ∼34%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6 fps ∼34% -2%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.3 fps ∼24% -30%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼73% +113%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4.6 - 6.2, n=8)
5.85 fps ∼33% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=466)
17.9 fps ∼100% +193%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11 fps ∼42%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11 fps ∼42% 0%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
8.1 fps ∼31% -26%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
26 fps ∼100% +136%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (10 - 11, n=8)
10.6 fps ∼41% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=468)
16.7 fps ∼64% +52%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.2 fps ∼42%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.3 fps ∼43% +2%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.8 fps ∼28% -33%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9.1 fps ∼91% +117%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4.1 - 4.3, n=8)
4.25 fps ∼43% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=189)
9.99 fps ∼100% +138%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.4 fps ∼20%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.3 fps ∼19% -7%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
0.84 fps ∼12% -40%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼40% +100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (1.3 - 1.6, n=8)
1.388 fps ∼20% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=188)
6.98 fps ∼100% +399%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.7 fps ∼45%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.8 fps ∼45% +1%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.4 fps ∼29% -34%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼100% +124%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (6.7 - 6.8, n=8)
6.78 fps ∼45% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=193)
14.7 fps ∼98% +119%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.7 fps ∼23%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.7 fps ∼23% 0%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.3 fps ∼14% -38%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.4 fps ∼51% +127%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3.5 - 4.7, n=8)
3.78 fps ∼23% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=193)
16.4 fps ∼100% +343%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.5 fps ∼20%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.8 fps ∼23% +12%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2 fps ∼16% -20%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼58% +184%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (2.1 - 2.9, n=8)
2.68 fps ∼22% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=391)
12.2 fps ∼100% +388%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.3 fps ∼33%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4 fps ∼31% -7%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos X20
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1.5 fps ∼12% -65%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼100% +202%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3.8 - 5.1, n=8)
4.44 fps ∼34% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=395)
10.9 fps ∼84% +153%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
88242 Points ∼62%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
46450 Points ∼32% -47%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
71347 Points ∼50% -19%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
77798 Points ∼54% -12%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
140633 Points ∼98% +59%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (71347 - 88242, n=9)
76135 Points ∼53% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=295)
143117 Points ∼100% +62%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
835 Points ∼60%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
664 Points ∼47% -20%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
776 Points ∼55% -7%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
776 Points ∼55% -7%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1400 Points ∼100% +68%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (10 - 835, n=8)
578 Points ∼41% -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=635)
760 Points ∼54% -9%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
771 Points ∼37%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
433 Points ∼21% -44%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
767 Points ∼37% -1%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
760 Points ∼37% -1%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1886 Points ∼91% +145%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (744 - 799, n=8)
769 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=635)
2070 Points ∼100% +168%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
782 Points ∼25%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
794 Points ∼25% +2%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
690 Points ∼22% -12%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1247 Points ∼39% +59%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
3174 Points ∼100% +306%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (661 - 1247, n=8)
928 Points ∼29% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=635)
1530 Points ∼48% +96%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2211 Points ∼43%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
1245 Points ∼24% -44%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2195 Points ∼43% -1%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2517 Points ∼49% +14%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5089 Points ∼100% +130%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (2165 - 2619, n=8)
2343 Points ∼46% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=635)
2994 Points ∼59% +35%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1027 Points ∼40%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
730 Points ∼29% -29%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
975 Points ∼38% -5%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1166 Points ∼46% +14%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2556 Points ∼100% +149%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (323 - 1166, n=8)
896 Points ∼35% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=635)
1501 Points ∼59% +46%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=107)
35.7 Points ∼100% +158%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
30.692 Points ∼86% +122%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus (Chrome 77)
13.85 Points ∼39%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
13.684 Points ∼38% -1%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (12.9 - 13.9, n=3)
13.5 Points ∼38% -3%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=165)
67 Points ∼100% +148%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
58 Points ∼87% +115%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
30 Points ∼45% +11%
LG K40 (Chrome 74)
29 Points ∼43% +7%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (26 - 30, n=7)
28.6 Points ∼43% +6%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus (Chrome 77)
27 Points ∼40%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
9260 Points ∼100% +123%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=693)
6801 Points ∼73% +64%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
4422 Points ∼48% +6%
LG K40 (Chrome 74)
4197 Points ∼45% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3312 - 4508, n=9)
4166 Points ∼45% 0%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus (Chrome 77)
4158 Points ∼45%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus (Chrome 70)
3250 Points ∼35% -22%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto E5 Plus (Chrome 70)
12723 ms * ∼100% -13%
LG K40 (Chrome 74)
11955 ms * ∼94% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (10846 - 12799, n=9)
11753 ms * ∼92% -4%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus (Chrome 77)
11272.6 ms * ∼89%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
11184.8 ms * ∼88% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=718)
10523 ms * ∼83% +7%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
4583.8 ms * ∼36% +59%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Motorola Moto E6 PlusMotorola Moto E5 PlusLG K40Sony Xperia L3TP-Link Neffos X20Xiaomi Mi A3Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
40%
-14%
-13%
-17%
133%
-16%
-7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.35 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.68 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
57.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
61.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
63.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
50.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-20%
50.4 (3.4 - 87.1, n=142)
-19%
49.2 (1.7 - 87.1, n=429)
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
77.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
80.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
82.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
67.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-18%
69.1 (8.2 - 96.5, n=142)
-16%
67.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=429)
-18%
Random Write 4KB
17.41
56.14
222%
10
-43%
16.36
-6%
8.65
-50%
117.4
574%
18.2 (0.75 - 77.3, n=185)
5%
22.4 (0.14 - 250, n=753)
29%
Random Read 4KB
61.71
62.71
2%
52.6
-15%
28.83
-53%
39.39
-36%
126.9
106%
39 (3.59 - 117, n=185)
-37%
47.8 (1.59 - 196, n=753)
-23%
Sequential Write 256KB
106.09
137.89
30%
100.5
-5%
87.52
-18%
90.58
-15%
184
73%
93.9 (14.8 - 189, n=185)
-11%
98.1 (2.99 - 590, n=753)
-8%
Sequential Read 256KB
277.67
248.49
-11%
261.7
-6%
290.89
5%
279.01
0%
502.2
81%
236 (25.8 - 452, n=185)
-15%
275 (12.1 - 1504, n=753)
-1%
 32.5 °C32.4 °C33.8 °C 
 32.2 °C32.3 °C33.4 °C 
 31.5 °C31.7 °C35.1 °C 
Maximum: 35.1 °C
Moyenne: 32.8 °C
30.8 °C30.2 °C30.5 °C
30.5 °C30.4 °C30.6 °C
30.7 °C30.4 °C30.2 °C
Maximum: 30.8 °C
Moyenne: 30.5 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  28 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.233.12536.230.13129.123.1403028.25042.341.66326.824.48020.318.61002522.312517.220.416017.931.420017.133.625017.94331516.250.640016.555.150015.357.963015.664.580015.670.7100014.874.6125014.472.1160014.671.6200014.772.3250014.172.9315014.476.4400014.477.2500014.977.3630014.775.9800014.572.11000014.871.4125001565.91600016.656.9SPL27.185.9N0.962.8median 15median 70.7Delta1.212.330.333.538.128.828.528.831.436.136.63824.629.224.128.720.524.31922.316.924.419.131.316.633.413.936.91544.714.648.912.356.111.86011.865.811.966.411.464.611.264.411.565.511.362.310.959.910.557.410.762.710.669.310.565.810.660.910.648.757.2247610.40.534.3median 11.8median 59.92.212.642.643.240.146.131.232.736.435.740.339.132.231.62526.527.724.623.222.621.822.420.721.51920.819.524.818.633.719.642.620.151.720.262.121.368.716.270.318.669.617.667.916.467.616.865.116.272.316.875.516.97216.670.4186617.960.61744.565.864.130.843.269.830.381.81716.11.43.421.11.445.3median 18.6median 62.1218.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto E6 PlusMotorola Moto E5 PlusLG K40
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto E6 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Motorola Moto E5 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

LG K40 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 10.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (39.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.06 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.57 / 1.69 / 1.72 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 3 / 4.88 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
5000 mAh
LG K40
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia L3
3300 mAh
TP-Link Neffos X20
4100 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-14%
-8%
7%
14%
-49%
-6%
-27%
Idle Minimum *
0.57
0.9
-58%
0.68
-19%
0.57
-0%
0.57
-0%
0.8
-40%
0.711 (0.57 - 1, n=9)
-25%
0.883 (0.2 - 3.4, n=783)
-55%
Idle Average *
1.69
1.5
11%
1.53
9%
1.5
11%
1.52
10%
2
-18%
1.589 (1 - 2.4, n=9)
6%
1.74 (0.6 - 6.2, n=782)
-3%
Idle Maximum *
1.72
2
-16%
1.95
-13%
1.51
12%
1.66
3%
3.3
-92%
1.982 (1.51 - 2.9, n=9)
-15%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=783)
-18%
Load Average *
3
3.2
-7%
3.5
-17%
3.09
-3%
2.34
22%
4.1
-37%
3.05 (2.18 - 4, n=9)
-2%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=777)
-36%
Load Maximum *
4.88
4.9
-0%
4.9
-0%
4.15
15%
3.16
35%
7.7
-58%
4.65 (3.43 - 5.9, n=9)
5%
5.93 (1.2 - 14.2, n=777)
-22%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 45min
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
5000 mAh
LG K40
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia L3
3300 mAh
TP-Link Neffos X20
4100 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
31%
-10%
-22%
-18%
19%
Reader / Idle
2127
1724
WiFi v1.3
825
1078
31%
745
-10%
641
-22%
674
-18%
985
19%
Load
242
297
H.264
750
1023

Points positifs

+ autonomie
+ batterie amovible
+ double SIM
+ emplacement micro SD dédié
+ cartes micro SD jusqu'à 512 Go
+ abordable
+ coque de protection incluse

Points négatifs

- performances du processeur
- Wifi
- nombre de bandes LTE
- pas d'Android 10 pour l'instant
- haut-parleur mono
En test : le Motorola Moto E6 Plus. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Motorola Allemagne.
En test : le Motorola Moto E6 Plus. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Motorola Allemagne.

Tandis que le Motorola Moto E6 Plus possède un écran et une autonomie corrects, ses performances laissent à désirer. Mais ce problème est celui de tous les appareils de notre comparatif – à l’exception de l’un d’entre eux.

L’E6 Plus est une mise à jour moyenne de son prédécesseur. Alors que les bandes noires ont cessé d’afficher les vidéos en boîte comme avec l’E5 Plus, Motorola a équipé l’E6 Plus d’une plus petite batterie. Notre modèle tient néanmoins plutôt bien dans nos tests d’autonomie, même s’il ne parvient pas à faire aussi bien que l’E5 Plus ou que le Xiaomi Mi A3.

Le Motorola Moto E6 Plus marque des bons points, mais ses performances sont trop faibles pour que l’on puisse le recommander sereinement.

Les 2 Go de RAM supplémentaires que propose la version 4 Go pourraient corriger en partie ce problème. Mais cela ne rendra pas le MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 plus puissant, si bien que nous recommandons de jeter un œil au Xiaomi Mi A3 si vous souhaitez acquérir un appareil du milieu de gamme abordable.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant Motorola Moto E6 Plus">ce lien.

Motorola Moto E6 Plus - 10/30/2019 v7
Inge Schwabe

Châssis
82%
Clavier
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositif de pointage
84%
Connectivité
40 / 70 → 56%
Poids
92%
Autonomie
90%
Écran
81%
Performances en jeu
6 / 64 → 9%
Performances dans les applications
43 / 86 → 50%
Chauffe
92%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Appareil photo
51%
Moyenne
69%
75%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Motorola Moto E6 Plus : le meilleur de l'autonomie, le pire des performances
Inge Schwabe, 2019-11- 5 (Update: 2019-11- 5)