Notebookcheck

Courte critique du PC portable Asus VivoBook 14 (i5-8265U, MX230, FHD)

Nino Ricchizzi, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, T. Hinum (traduit par Prévots), 05/03/2019

Pascal fait de son mieux. Le nouveau portable polyvalent d’Asus s’équipe d’une carte graphique du milieu de gamme, pour mieux pénétrer le monde du multimédia. Le nouveau VivoBook est non seulement fin et élégant, mais également puissant. Cependant, la machine Asus doit avouer ses limites dans certains domaines de la concurrence.

Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T (VivoBook 14 Gamme)
Processeur
Intel Core i5-8265U, 4 coeurs, enveloppe thermique de 15 Watts
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 - 2048 Mo, Processeur: 1510 MHz, Mémoire: 1502 MHz, GDDR5, 25.21.14.1735 (NVIDIA 417.35)
Mémoire
8192 Mo 
, double canal (4 Go soudés + 4 Go), 1 emplacement sur 1 occupé
Écran
14 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPP, AU Optronics AUO403D B140HAN04.0, IPS, brillant: non
Carte mère
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disque dur
Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ, 512 Go 
, SSD M.2
Carte son
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales
Réseau
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 19 x 322 x 212
Batterie
37 Wh Lithium-Ion
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: 720p
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréos, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, 24 Mois Garantie
Poids
1.46 kg, Alimentation: 200 g
Prix
800 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Le VivoBook possède une allure familière.
Le VivoBook possède une allure familière.
Le design est inspiré de la série ZenBook plus chère.
Cependant, cette offre à prix contenu...
...n'utilise que du plastique.
La qualité est néanmoins de la partie.

Comparaison des tailles

328 mm 229 mm 17.6 mm 1.6 kg322 mm 212 mm 19 mm 1.5 kg323 mm 221 mm 16 mm 1.4 kg319 mm 199 mm 15.9 mm 1.2 kg319 mm 199 mm 15.9 mm 1.2 kg308.5 mm 231 mm 18 mm 1.4 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 14 5495
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
116.6 MB/s ∼100% +574%
HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
75.6 MB/s ∼65% +337%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 190, n=169)
57 MB/s ∼49% +229%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
36 MB/s ∼31% +108%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
17.3 MB/s ∼15%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 14 5495
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
203.2 MB/s ∼100% +706%
HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.8 MB/s ∼40% +225%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.2 - 253, n=166)
73.4 MB/s ∼36% +191%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
25.8 MB/s ∼13% +2%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
25.2 MB/s ∼12%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
669 (min: 636, max: 689) MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
616 (min: 569, max: 634) MBit/s ∼92%
Honor Magicbook
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
540 (min: 268, max: 550) MBit/s ∼81% -12%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
452 (min: 329, max: 553) MBit/s ∼68% -27%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
448 (min: 248, max: 548) MBit/s ∼67% -27%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
675 (min: 561, max: 737) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
659 (min: 585, max: 715) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
653 (min: 322, max: 702) MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Honor Magicbook
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
628 (min: 281, max: 654) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
541 (min: 318, max: 616) MBit/s ∼80% -20%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø616 (569-634)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø675 (561-737)
254
cd/m²
244
cd/m²
266
cd/m²
248
cd/m²
267
cd/m²
248
cd/m²
268
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 268 cd/m² Moyenne: 256.8 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 91 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 267 cd/m²
Contraste: 1335:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.79 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 4.71
ΔE Greyscale 1.49 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
59% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.48
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
AU Optronics AUO403D B140HAN04.0, , 1920x1080, 14
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
AU Optronics B140HAN03.2, , 1920x1080, 14
HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA
CMN1375, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Dell Latitude 14 5495
CMN14C9, , 1920x1080, 14
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
AU Optronics B140HAN03.2, , 1920x1080, 14
Response Times
-9%
-4%
-3%
-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 (19, 21)
44 (24, 20)
-10%
40.8 (22.8, 18)
-2%
41 (24, 17)
-3%
42 (21, 21)
-5%
Response Time Black / White *
29 (17, 12)
31 (18, 13)
-7%
30.4 (16.4, 14)
-5%
30 (19, 11)
-3%
28 (16, 12)
3%
PWM Frequency
26040 (40)
25000 (30)
Screen
-32%
-28%
-20%
-34%
Brightness middle
267
330
24%
255
-4%
212
-21%
321
20%
Brightness
257
285
11%
238
-7%
200
-22%
282
10%
Brightness Distribution
91
78
-14%
88
-3%
89
-2%
77
-15%
Black Level *
0.2
0.23
-15%
0.18
10%
0.23
-15%
0.2
-0%
Contrast
1335
1435
7%
1417
6%
922
-31%
1605
20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.79
5.77
-52%
5.4
-42%
4.34
-15%
6.35
-68%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.18
10.46
-28%
19.5
-138%
9.01
-10%
12.2
-49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.71
3.18
32%
4.1
13%
1.88
60%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.49
7.61
-411%
3.8
-155%
2.81
-89%
8.35
-460%
Gamma
2.48 89%
2.46 89%
2.41 91%
2.22 99%
2.51 88%
CCT
6659 98%
7485 87%
7100 92%
6286 103%
8227 79%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38
57
50%
39.4
4%
39
3%
59
55%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59
88
49%
62.5
6%
61
3%
91
54%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-21% / -28%
-16% / -24%
-12% / -17%
-18% / -29%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
29 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 17 ms hausse
↘ 12 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (25.2 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
40 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 19 ms hausse
↘ 21 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (40.2 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9439 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660Tooltip
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø503 (492.9-621.35)
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø456 (442.93-580.91)
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø504 (494.08-654.12)
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U; BIOS 204: Ø571 (557.17-647.21)
HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø554 (547.53-598.04)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
Intel Core i5-8265U
161 Points ∼74%
HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA
Intel Core i5-8265U
154.25 Points ∼71% -4%
Lenovo Ideapad S530-13IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
154 Points ∼71% -4%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U
  (111 - 163, n=22)
154 Points ∼71% -4%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
Intel Core i7-8565U
153 Points ∼70% -5%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Core i5-8265U
149 Points ∼68% -7%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
148 Points ∼68% -8%
Honor Magicbook
Intel Core i5-8250U
145 Points ∼67% -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 196, n=358)
127 Points ∼58% -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Ideapad S530-13IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
679 Points ∼16% +9%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
670 Points ∼15% +8%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Core i5-8265U
654 Points ∼15% +5%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Core i5-8265U
647 Points ∼15% +4%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
Intel Core i5-8265U
623 Points ∼14%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U
  (483 - 750, n=24)
603 Points ∼14% -3%
HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA
Intel Core i5-8265U
598 (min: 547.53, max: 598.04) Points ∼14% -4%
Honor Magicbook
Intel Core i5-8250U
590 Points ∼13% -5%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
Intel Core i7-8565U
581 Points ∼13% -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (73 - 1550, n=374)
480 Points ∼11% -23%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
161 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
623 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
82.11 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Aide
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Multimedia
  (1001 - 7161, n=89)
3665 Points ∼33% +36%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
GeForce MX150, 8565U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
3194 Points ∼29% +19%
HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
2985 Points ∼27% +11%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
2902 Points ∼26% +8%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
GeForce MX230, 8265U, Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ
2685 Points ∼24%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX230
 
2685 Points ∼24% 0%
Productivity
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
GeForce MX230, 8265U, Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ
6755 Points ∼70%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX230
 
6755 Points ∼70% 0%
HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
6279 Points ∼65% -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1407 - 8020, n=90)
6085 Points ∼63% -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
GeForce MX150, 8565U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
6072 Points ∼63% -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
5939 Points ∼61% -12%
Essentials
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
GeForce MX230, 8265U, Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ
7981 Points ∼75%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX230
 
7981 Points ∼75% 0%
HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
7656 Points ∼72% -4%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
7618 Points ∼71% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2891 - 9360, n=90)
7361 Points ∼69% -8%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
GeForce MX150, 8565U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7117 Points ∼67% -11%
Score
Average of class Multimedia
  (1144 - 5358, n=90)
3886 Points ∼50% +3%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
GeForce MX230, 8265U, Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ
3764 Points ∼48%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX230
 
3764 Points ∼48% 0%
HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
3753 Points ∼48% 0%
Honor Magicbook
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
3740 Points ∼48% -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
GeForce MX150, 8565U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
3704 Points ∼48% -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
3643 Points ∼47% -3%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Honor Magicbook
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
3741 Points ∼61%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
3733 Points ∼61%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
GeForce MX150, 8565U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
3691 Points ∼61%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1371 - 4693, n=293)
3374 Points ∼55%
HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
3342 Points ∼55%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
Dell Latitude 14 5495
Intel SSDSCKKF256G8
Average Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
148%
160%
7%
9%
96%
Write 4K
55.04
99.9
82%
101.8
85%
48.45
-12%
59.8 (55 - 64.5, n=2)
9%
86.3 (0.76 - 200, n=99)
57%
Read 4K
28.79
40.03
39%
41.35
44%
25.11
-13%
26.9 (24.9 - 28.8, n=2)
-7%
28.7 (0.29 - 57.2, n=99)
0%
Write Seq
307.5
973.1
216%
928.5
202%
341.2
11%
380 (308 - 453, n=2)
24%
745 (64.8 - 2910, n=99)
142%
Read Seq
430
1111
158%
1388
223%
520.6
21%
427 (425 - 430, n=2)
-1%
916 (65.9 - 2820, n=99)
113%
Write 4K Q32T1
149.5
424.6
184%
453.5
203%
202
35%
204 (150 - 258, n=2)
36%
272 (0.84 - 1707, n=99)
82%
Read 4K Q32T1
207.2
255.9
24%
286.2
38%
243.5
18%
204 (200 - 207, n=2)
-2%
310 (0.417 - 1015, n=99)
50%
Write Seq Q32T1
389.2
1300
234%
1302
235%
320.8
-18%
447 (389 - 504, n=2)
15%
848 (65.6 - 3349, n=99)
118%
Read Seq Q32T1
497.1
1723
247%
1751
252%
555.2
12%
478 (460 - 497, n=2)
-4%
1524 (65.7 - 3540, n=99)
207%
Write 4K Q8T8
572.3
247.5
284
986 (98 - 1814, n=7)
Read 4K Q8T8
825.8
253.4
301
682 (209 - 1023, n=7)
AS SSD
204%
157%
27%
43%
-14%
Copy Game MB/s
549.22
796.19
260.04
151
326 (12 - 1134, n=160)
Copy Program MB/s
246.84
376.43
152.14
106
195 (8.81 - 653, n=160)
Copy ISO MB/s
600.52
1116.67
441.25
546
536 (10 - 2577, n=161)
Score Total
782
2048
162%
1706
118%
751
-4%
966 (782 - 1150, n=2)
24%
1306 (20 - 5355, n=211)
67%
Score Write
153
815
433%
600
292%
288
88%
345 (153 - 537, n=2)
125%
459 (7 - 2992, n=211)
200%
Score Read
411
829
102%
745
81%
309
-25%
407 (403 - 411, n=2)
-1%
578 (8 - 2132, n=211)
41%
Access Time Write *
0.4
0.028
93%
0.03
92%
0.101
75%
0.287 (0.174 - 0.4, n=2)
28%
2.14 (0.021 - 34, n=240)
-435%
Access Time Read *
0.432
0.114
74%
0.107
75%
0.128
70%
0.27 (0.108 - 0.432, n=2)
37%
2.6 (0.04 - 33, n=241)
-502%
4K-64 Write
87.19
605.06
594%
408.2
368%
225.18
158%
264 (87.2 - 440, n=2)
203%
300 (0.27 - 2716, n=245)
244%
4K-64 Read
325.38
652.98
101%
567.08
74%
238.42
-27%
325 (324 - 325, n=2)
0%
412 (0.36 - 1823, n=245)
27%
4K Write
26.46
130.83
394%
119.73
352%
34.58
31%
44 (26.5 - 61.6, n=2)
66%
62.6 (0.24 - 176, n=245)
137%
4K Read
36.4
37.3
2%
40.67
12%
19.76
-46%
33.7 (30.9 - 36.4, n=2)
-7%
25.5 (0.23 - 61, n=245)
-30%
Seq Write
392.72
794.94
102%
725.53
85%
286.49
-27%
372 (351 - 393, n=2)
-5%
484 (29.7 - 2604, n=245)
23%
Seq Read
487.61
1388.77
185%
1373.07
182%
507.15
4%
487 (485 - 488, n=2)
0%
828 (48.7 - 2860, n=245)
70%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
176% / 180%
159% / 159%
17% / 18%
26% / 28%
41% / 32%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
4792 Points ∼100% +44%
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8565U
4514 Points ∼94% +36%
Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U
4191 Points ∼87% +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX230
  (3318 - 3582, n=3)
3409 Points ∼71% +3%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
NVIDIA GeForce MX230, Intel Core i5-8265U
3318 Points ∼69%
Average of class Multimedia
  (352 - 20837, n=628)
2932 Points ∼61% -12%
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i7-8565U
2908 Points ∼61% -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
2535 Points ∼53% -24%
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
2206 Points ∼46% -34%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (142 - 4734, n=54)
1607 Points ∼100% +126%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
NVIDIA GeForce MX230, Intel Core i5-8265U
710 Points ∼44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX230
 
710 Points ∼44% 0%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3698 Points ∼100% +56%
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8565U
3586 Points ∼97% +51%
Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U
3389 Points ∼92% +43%
Average of class Multimedia
  (337 - 16100, n=402)
2832 Points ∼77% +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX230
  (2287 - 2729, n=3)
2462 Points ∼67% +4%
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i7-8565U
2383 Points ∼64% +1%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
NVIDIA GeForce MX230, Intel Core i5-8265U
2369 Points ∼64%
Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
2132 Points ∼58% -10%
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
1621 Points ∼44% -32%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8565U
21260 Points ∼100% +39%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
19545 Points ∼92% +28%
Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U
18513 Points ∼87% +21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2468 - 77755, n=405)
16588 Points ∼78% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX230
  (15299 - 17999, n=3)
16363 Points ∼77% +7%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
NVIDIA GeForce MX230, Intel Core i5-8265U
15299 Points ∼72%
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i7-8565U
13776 Points ∼65% -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
13775 Points ∼65% -10%
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
9056 Points ∼43% -41%
3DMark 11 Performance
3570 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
61160 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
10178 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
2202 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
797 points
Aide
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
30 fps ∼100% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX230
  (28 - 31.2, n=2)
29.6 fps ∼99% +6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.62 - 149, n=215)
28.1 fps ∼94% +1%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX230
27.96 fps ∼93%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
19.8 fps ∼66% -29%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
9.9 fps ∼33% -65%
HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
7.36 fps ∼25% -74%
1366x768 High Preset
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
81.1 fps ∼100% +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX230
  (70.2 - 79.2, n=2)
74.7 fps ∼92% +6%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX230
70.18 fps ∼87%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36.3 - 277, n=250)
62.8 fps ∼77% -11%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
53.2 fps ∼66% -24%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
31 fps ∼38% -56%
HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
24.32 fps ∼30% -65%
#ff7777;">7 (DirectX11)7
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 151.4682.870.1827.96fps
GTA V (2015) 71.5164.526.910.6fps
Overwatch (2016) 9078.335.916.6fps
Rocket League (2017) 152.677.772.7fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 58.523.82117.3fps
Destiny 2 (2017) 44.923.92217.5fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 2611.47.4fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 31.513.811.67fps
Monster Hunter World (2018) 34.112.910.98.3fps
F1 2018 (2018) 48231812fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 321010 (DirectX11)fps
FIFA 19 (2018) 80.558.652.652.2fps
Forza Horizon 4 (2018) 46211612fps
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 2613106fps
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) 36.818.913.811.7fps
Hitman 2 (2018) 29.313.410.79.9fps
Battlefield V (2018) 38.320.21612fps
Farming Simulator 19 (2018) 122.348.623.817.6fps
Darksiders III (2018) 69.319.815.913.4fps
Just Cause 4 (2018) 30.917.412.710.9fps
Apex Legends (2019) 45.817.814.412.4fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 32151312fps
Metro Exodus (2019) 25.94.83.34.5fps
Anthem (2019) 22.712.311.19.8fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 7122.917.510.4fps
The Division 2 (2019) 4313106fps

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
30 / 30 / 30 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
33.5 / 38 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 29.9 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.433.730.93436.42531.434.532.334.131.43132.733.636.333.732.74036.630.432.532.336.65033.333.730.629.633.36330.130.831.427.530.18028.625.927.324.628.610027.526.926.426.727.51252627.125.124.82616025.224.524.124.525.220024.22423.223.924.225023.522.823.122.623.531523.823.221.721.523.840022.521.820.720.522.550023.622.319.820.123.663024.522.519.719.124.580026.422.819.318.526.4100030.426.219.418.530.4125028.423.618.517.728.4160028.522.918.417.728.5200027.322.218.117.627.3250026.321.61818.126.3315025.320.318.218.425.3400021.91918.418.321.95000211918.618.521630019.718.918.818.719.7800019.219191919.21000019.119.119.21919.11250019.119.119.119.119.11600019.519.519.419.219.5SPL37.833.931.130.837.8N2.51.81.41.32.5median 24.2median 22.3median 19.3median 19median 24.2Delta2.421.51.52.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
 45.4 °C44 °C30.1 °C 
 41.1 °C40.3 °C29 °C 
 26.6 °C27.9 °C27 °C 
Maximum: 45.4 °C
Moyenne: 34.6 °C
26.1 °C44.4 °C44 °C
29.7 °C40.5 °C43 °C
27.2 °C28.4 °C27.5 °C
Maximum: 44.4 °C
Moyenne: 34.5 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  49.3 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 23.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.9 °C / 82.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.1 °C / 84.4 F (+1.2 °C / 2.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.43437.42534.734.134.73139.133.739.14032.832.332.8503129.6316329.427.529.48029.924.629.910035.526.735.512542.724.842.716045.824.545.82004523.9452505422.65431561.121.561.140064.120.564.15006420.16463064.319.164.380073.918.573.910007318.57312506917.769160068.717.768.7200072.517.672.5250070.118.170.1315070.518.470.5400069.818.369.850007318.573630073.818.773.8800074.11974.11000074.41974.41250077.219.177.21600077.819.277.8SPL8430.884N551.355median 69.8median 19median 69.8Delta81.5835.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084TApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.29 / 0.45 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 3.7 / 6.1 / 8.3 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 43 / 61.6 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA
8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
569 min ∼22% +72%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
563 min ∼21% +70%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
2700U, Vega 10, 61 Wh
562 min ∼21% +70%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
8565U, GeForce MX150, 50 Wh
499 min ∼19% +51%
Average of class Multimedia
  (96 - 942, n=241)
355 min ∼13% +7%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
8265U, GeForce MX230, 37 Wh
331.3 min ∼13%
Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 31.3min

Points positifs

+ taille et poids réduits
+ clavier rétroéclairé
+ OS fluide
+ écran mat IPS

Points négatifs

- tout en plastique
- maintenance difficile
- luminosité
- autonomie
- CPU pas utilisé au mieux
En test : l'Asus VivoBook 14. Modèle de test fourni par
En test : l'Asus VivoBook 14. Modèle de test fourni par

Afin de répondre aux besoins classiques de bureautique, de multimédia et de jeu, Asus propose avec le VivoBook une machine polyvalente à 800 €. Le portable Asus paraît élégant tout en n’étant fait que de plastique. Le châssis est dans l’ensemble solide, et présente bien. Les périphériques d’entrée sont assez bons pour une utilisation bureautique légère. Le clavier semble un peu mou quand on tape rapidement. De même, l’écran n’est pas sans défaut. Même s’il possède de bons angles de vision, des couleurs fidèles et une finition matte, sa faible luminosité gâche tout à nos yeux.

En ce qui concerne les composants, leur combinaison est réussie. La valeur ajoutée de la Nvidia GeForce MX230 est notable. Le volume sonore et la chauffe restent également à des niveaux acceptables. C’est dommage que le throttling et qu’une réduction rapide du boost gênent l’expérience globale. Il y a plus de potentiel ici.

Il y a également une marge de progression concernant l’autonomie. Le VivoBook fait moins bien que les autres appareils de sa catégorie - les concurrents comme le HP ProBook 430 G6 font mieux.

Malgré certaines faiblesses, l’Asus VivoBook s’avère être un appareil polyvalent efficace pour un usage classique au quotidien.

Avant de se décider à acheter, il faut jeter un œil aux concurrents, tel le ProBook 430 G6.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T - 04/28/2019 v6
Nino Ricchizzi

Châssis
79 / 98 → 81%
Clavier
80%
Dispositif de pointage
86%
Connectivité
45 / 81 → 55%
Poids
70 / 20-67 → 100%
Autonomie
85%
Écran
88%
Performances en jeu
72 / 85 → 85%
Performances dans les applications
84 / 92 → 91%
Chauffe
91%
Nuisance sonore
93 / 95 → 98%
Audio
65%
Moyenne
78%
85%
Multimedia - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du PC portable Asus VivoBook 14 (i5-8265U, MX230, FHD)
Nino Ricchizzi, 2019-05- 3 (Update: 2019-05- 3)