Notebookcheck

Courte critique du PC portable de jeu HP Pavilion Gaming 15 (i7-8750H, GTX 1050 Ti, mémoire Optane, FHD)

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (traduit par Prévots), 12/14/2018

Joueur du milieu de gamme. Le processeur Coffee Lake à six cœurs et la carte graphique GeForce GTX 1050 Ti peuvent faire tourner fluidement tous les jeux actuels sur l’écran IPS mat Full HD du HP Pavilion Gaming 15. En plus de cela, l’appareil possède 8 Go de RAM double canal, une mémoire Intel Optane, et un clavier honnête. Il possède cependant quelques défauts.

HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng (Pavilion 15 Gamme)
Processeur
Intel Core i7-8750H
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop) - 4096 Mo, Processeur: 1493-1620 MHz, Mémoire: 1752 MHz, GDDR5, 128 bit memory bus, Nvidia 417.01, Optimus
Mémoire
8192 Mo 
, DDR4-2666, double canal, deux emplacements sur deux occupés
Écran
15.6 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPP, BOE07A1, IPS, 60 Hz, brillant: non
Carte mère
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Disque dur
Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD,  Go 
, 869 Go libres
Carte son
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Connexions
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: combo jack, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: SDXC, TPM 2.0
Réseau
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 25.4 x 365 x 256.5
Batterie
52.5 Wh, 4550 mAh Lithium-Ion, 11,55 V
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: HD
Appareil photo primaire: 0.9 MPix
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, McAfee LiveSafe (version d'essai), 12 Mois Garantie
Poids
2.4 kg, Alimentation: 442 g
Prix
999 Euro
Liens
HP Page d'accueil
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparaison des tailles

390 mm 266 mm 27 mm 2.4 kg390 mm 266 mm 27 mm 2.3 kg378 mm 267 mm 27 mm 2.4 kg366 mm 254 mm 25.4 mm 2.3 kg365 mm 256.5 mm 25.4 mm 2.4 kg360 mm 268 mm 28 mm 2.3 kg

Top 10
» Le Top 10 des PC portables multimédia 
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu légers
» Le Top 10 des ordinateurs portables bureautiques
» Le Top 10 des PC portables bureautiques premium/professionnels 
» Le Top 10 des Stations de travail mobiles
» Le Top 10 des Ultraportables
» Le Top 10 des Ultrabooks
» Le Top 10 des Convertibles
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes Windows
» Le Top 10 des Smartphones
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 300 euros
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 500 euros
» Le Top 25 des meilleurs écrans d'ordinateurs

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=222)
91.4 MB/s ∼100% +25%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s ∼88% +9%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79.5 MB/s ∼87% +9%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s ∼86% +8%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
73.1 MB/s ∼80%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
70 MB/s ∼77% -4%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=220)
110 MB/s ∼100% +37%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼79% +8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s ∼78% +7%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s ∼77% +6%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.76 MB/s ∼74% +2%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80.5 MB/s ∼73%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
689 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
683 MBit/s ∼99% +9%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
677 MBit/s ∼98% +8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
674 MBit/s ∼98% +8%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
663 MBit/s ∼96% +6%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
624 (min: 509, max: 654) MBit/s ∼91%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=217)
599 MBit/s ∼87% -4%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
660 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
655 (min: 646, max: 660) MBit/s ∼99%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
636 MBit/s ∼96% -3%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
632 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
630 MBit/s ∼95% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 721, n=217)
546 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
520 MBit/s ∼79% -21%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660Tooltip
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø623 (509-654)
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø655 (646-660)
262
cd/m²		257
cd/m²		265
cd/m²
234
cd/m²		241
cd/m²		229
cd/m²
198
cd/m²		218
cd/m²		218
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 265 cd/m² Moyenne: 235.8 cd/m² Minimum: 13.8 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 75 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 208 cd/m²
Contraste: 1607:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.15 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.85 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 5.15 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
59% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
TN, 1920x1080, 15.6		Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-5%
24%
64%
27%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47 (23, 24)
48.4 (24, 24.4)
-3%
38 (19.2, 18.8)
19%
17.6 (9.2, 8.4)
63%
44.8 (23.6, 21.2)
5%
43.6 (19.2, 24.4)
7%
Response Time Black / White *
31 (17, 14)
32.8 (18, 14.8)
-6%
22 (12, 10)
29%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
64%
16 (10, 6)
48%
32.4 (18, 14.4)
-5%
PWM Frequency
208 (90)
Screen
10%
1%
11%
-68%
-28%
Brightness middle
241
299
24%
252
5%
357.5
48%
200
-17%
282.8
17%
Brightness
236
284
20%
237
0%
351
49%
186
-21%
264
12%
Brightness Distribution
75
88
17%
86
15%
85
13%
85
13%
88
17%
Black Level *
0.15
0.24
-60%
0.21
-40%
0.36
-140%
0.43
-187%
0.42
-180%
Contrast
1607
1246
-22%
1200
-25%
993
-38%
465
-71%
673
-58%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.85
4.98
-3%
4.42
9%
4.19
14%
11.39
-135%
4.93
-2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.82
7.67
13%
7.21
18%
6.97
21%
19.36
-120%
17.65
-100%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.15
4.58
11%
3.74
27%
3.5
32%
11.73
-128%
3.8
26%
Gamma
2.49 88%
2.55 86%
2.34 94%
2.324 95%
1.97 112%
2.449 90%
CCT
7042 92%
6397 102%
7291 89%
7028 92%
12614 52%
6112 106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38
57
50%
38
0%
60
58%
35
-8%
36
-5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59
87
47%
59
0%
91
54%
55
-7%
57
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.7
3.08
3.2
3.05
4.07
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
3% / 7%
13% / 5%
38% / 20%
-21% / -52%
-14% / -23%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ
Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 208 Hz ≤ 90 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 208 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 90 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 208 Hz est relativement faible, les personnes les plus sensibles devraient percevoir un scintillement et être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire accrue (avec le niveau de luminosité indiqué)

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9654 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - Grayscales
CalMAN - Grayscales
CalMAN - Saturation
CalMAN - Saturation

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ
Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
   ↔    Temps de réponse noir à blanc
31 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 17 ms hausse
↘ 14 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (25.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
   ↔    Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
47 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 23 ms hausse
↘ 24 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (40.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
HP Pavilion Gaming 15 - CPU-Z.
HP Pavilion Gaming 15 - CPU-Z.
HP Pavilion Gaming 15 - CPU-Z.
HP Pavilion Gaming 15 - CPU-Z.
HP Pavilion Gaming 15 - CPU-Z.
HP Pavilion Gaming 15 - GPU-Z.
HP Pavilion Gaming 15 - GPU-Z.
HP Pavilion Gaming 15 - HWInfo.
HP Pavilion Gaming 15 - LatencyMon.
HP Pavilion Gaming 15 - Intel XTU.
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120Tooltip
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø988 (977.49-1049.42)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Ryzen 7 2700U: Ø658 (642.69-661.47)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1046 (1037.32-1090)
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø855 (845-860.07)
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø969 (936-1116.11)
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH Intel Core i5-8300H, Intel Core i5-8300H: Ø817 (804.93-829.48)
HP Pavilion Gaming 15 - Fréquence durant la boucle CB15.
Fréquence durant la boucle CB15.
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6692
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
32391
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6630
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
72.41 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
11.26 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.98 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
105.16 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1049 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
173 Points
Aide
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | Geekbench 4.3 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | JetStream 1.1
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel Core i7-8750H
177 Points ∼100% +2%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼99% +1%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
Intel Core i7-8750H
173 Points ∼98% 0%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
173 Points ∼98%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=82)
172 Points ∼97% -1%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Core i5-8300H
171 Points ∼97% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=462)
154 Points ∼87% -11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
150 Points ∼85% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
Intel Core i7-8750H
1116 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=89)
1108 Points ∼99% +6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel Core i7-8750H
1090 Points ∼98% +4%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
1049 Points ∼94%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
Intel Core i7-8750H
863 Points ∼77% -18%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Core i5-8300H
818 Points ∼73% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1979, n=465)
788 Points ∼71% -25%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
661 Points ∼59% -37%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (1.89 - 2, n=40)
1.967 Points ∼99% -1%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.96 Points ∼98% -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
1.71 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=415)
1.686 Points ∼85% -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.98 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (9.54 - 13.5, n=41)
12.2 Points ∼94% +8%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.01 Points ∼93% +7%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.26 Points ∼87%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
Intel Core i7-8750H
9.54 Points ∼73% -15%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
7.53 Points ∼58% -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.4, n=516)
7.37 Points ∼57% -35%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
6630 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (6236 - 6645, n=24)
6475 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.85 - 8872, n=413)
4783 Points ∼72% -28%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (29664 - 35307, n=24)
33176 Points ∼100% +2%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
32391 Points ∼98%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.7 - 48808, n=413)
17919 Points ∼54% -45%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (20725 - 22665, n=12)
21808 Points ∼100% +3%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
21215 Points ∼97%
Average of class Gaming
  (9307 - 27774, n=66)
15588 Points ∼71% -27%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (3734 - 4144, n=12)
3981 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
3955 Points ∼99%
Average of class Gaming
  (2926 - 4825, n=66)
3643 Points ∼92% -8%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (17048 - 22006, n=8)
19665 Points ∼100% +3%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
19159 Points ∼97%
Average of class Gaming
  (8085 - 26471, n=29)
15155 Points ∼77% -21%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
4854 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (4548 - 4997, n=8)
4839 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (3387 - 5744, n=29)
4476 Points ∼92% -8%
Geekbench 4.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (17709 - 23313, n=16)
20935 Points ∼100% +3%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
20235 Points ∼97%
Average of class Gaming
  (4116 - 32070, n=40)
18620 Points ∼89% -8%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
5009 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (4669 - 5126, n=16)
4972 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2131 - 6030, n=40)
4722 Points ∼94% -6%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (753 - 7545, n=155)
1231 ms * ∼100% -12%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (695 - 1272, n=47)
1113 ms * ∼90% -1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
1102.3 ms * ∼90%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Core i5-8300H (Microsoft Edge 42.17134.1.0)
1094.7 ms * ∼89% +1%
Octane V2 - Total Score
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
34775 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Core i5-8300H (Microsoft Edge 42.17134.1.0)
34278 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (27460 - 44549, n=44)
34058 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (12288 - 49518, n=149)
32890 Points ∼95% -5%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Core i5-8300H (Microsoft Edge 42.17134.1.0)
250.59 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (51.6 - 333, n=153)
249 Points ∼99% 0%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
248.57 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (205 - 299, n=46)
247 Points ∼99% -1%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

PCMark 7 Score
6418 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4259 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4820 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5249 points
Aide
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (1764 - 11191, n=154)
6177 Points ∼100% +21%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5682 Points ∼92% +12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
5485 Points ∼89% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
  (5070 - 5616, n=10)
5305 Points ∼86% +4%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5258 Points ∼85% +3%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD
5088 Points ∼82%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
4959 Points ∼80% -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND
3855 Points ∼62% -24%
Productivity
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
7246 Points ∼100% +8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
7088 Points ∼98% +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (4175 - 8968, n=155)
7080 Points ∼98% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
  (6607 - 7332, n=10)
6989 Points ∼96% +4%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6830 Points ∼94% +1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD
6739 Points ∼93%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6629 Points ∼91% -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND
5574 Points ∼77% -17%
Essentials
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
8735 Points ∼100% +4%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
8418 Points ∼96% 0%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD
8388 Points ∼96%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
  (7142 - 9110, n=10)
8371 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (4892 - 10668, n=156)
8229 Points ∼94% -2%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
8186 Points ∼94% -2%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7598 Points ∼87% -9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND
6733 Points ∼77% -20%
Score
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=157)
5096 Points ∼100% +8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
5001 Points ∼98% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
  (4532 - 5162, n=10)
4851 Points ∼95% +3%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
4812 Points ∼94% +2%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4767 Points ∼94% +1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD
4732 Points ∼93%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4724 Points ∼93% 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND
3763 Points ∼74% -20%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
5370 Points ∼100% +2%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
5369 Points ∼100% +2%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5346 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
  (4973 - 5461, n=10)
5312 Points ∼99% +1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5308 Points ∼99% +1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD
5249 Points ∼98%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=346)
4981 Points ∼93% -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND
4810 Points ∼90% -8%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4606 Points ∼100% +8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
4371 Points ∼95% +3%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD
4259 Points ∼92%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=364)
4245 Points ∼92% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
  (3894 - 4371, n=10)
4162 Points ∼90% -2%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
4129 Points ∼90% -3%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4017 Points ∼87% -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND
3860 Points ∼84% -9%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD
Sequential Read: 850.7 MB/s
Sequential Write: 156.6 MB/s
512K Read: 778.3 MB/s
512K Write: 153.1 MB/s
4K Read: 120 MB/s
4K Write: 69.35 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 568 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 162 MB/s
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD		Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
SK Hynix HFS128G39TND		Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7		HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ		Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G		Average Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-25%
80%
298%
266%
9%
0%
Write 4K
59.22
73.01
23%
78.8
33%
129.5
119%
107
81%
71.77
21%
59.2
0%
Read 4K
91.32
29.16
-68%
29.51
-68%
44.61
-51%
39.91
-56%
41.03
-55%
91.3
0%
Write Seq
158.3
135.9
-14%
581.2
267%
1268
701%
1439
809%
349
120%
158
0%
Read Seq
879.5
498.5
-43%
934.2
6%
991.8
13%
2011
129%
735.5
-16%
880
0%
Write 4K Q32T1
161.8
135.4
-16%
280.8
74%
535
231%
282.1
74%
105.3
-35%
162
0%
Read 4K Q32T1
286.5
215.6
-25%
335.6
17%
601.1
110%
326.6
14%
308
8%
287
0%
Write Seq Q32T1
159.8
135.7
-15%
571.3
258%
1938
1113%
1441
802%
151.4
-5%
160
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
929.3
511.7
-45%
1389
49%
2306
148%
3516
278%
1262
36%
929
0%
AS SSD
-16%
217%
649%
310%
21%
0%
Copy Game MB/s
81.65
81.7
0%
Copy Program MB/s
94.13
94.1
0%
Copy ISO MB/s
110.07
110
0%
Score Total
577
600
4%
1643
185%
4113
613%
1983
244%
838
45%
577
0%
Score Write
211
194
-8%
661
213%
2087
889%
699
231%
128
-39%
211
0%
Score Read
233
274
18%
670
188%
1319
466%
886
280%
497
113%
233
0%
Access Time Write *
0.043
0.269
-526%
0.039
9%
0.038
12%
0.037
14%
0.287
-567%
0.043
-0%
Access Time Read *
14.987
0.121
99%
0.12
99%
0.051
100%
0.08
99%
0.626
96%
15
-0%
4K-64 Write
137.26
127.11
-7%
510.77
272%
1808.44
1218%
459.83
235%
78.92
-43%
137
0%
4K-64 Read
42.09
203.12
383%
505.44
1101%
1160.14
2656%
567.26
1248%
335.26
697%
42.1
0%
4K Write
59.54
54.49
-8%
94.53
59%
95.91
61%
102.61
72%
35.74
-40%
59.5
0%
4K Read
105.05
23.64
-77%
32.38
-69%
35.03
-67%
46.14
-56%
38.71
-63%
105
0%
Seq Write
147.01
126.79
-14%
554.03
277%
1829.47
1144%
1365.1
829%
131.64
-10%
147
0%
Seq Read
853.87
470.8
-45%
1320.51
55%
1234.66
45%
2723.52
219%
1230.64
44%
854
0%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-21% / -20%
149% / 159%
474% / 501%
288% / 292%
15% / 16%
0% / 0%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

3DMark 06 Standard
33957 points
3DMark 11 Performance
8501 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
87964 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
25570 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6286 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
2196 points
Aide
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
13030 Points ∼100% +57%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=563)
12695 Points ∼97% +53%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i5-8300H
9909 Points ∼76% +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
  (8304 - 10402, n=36)
9591 Points ∼74% +15%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
9203 Points ∼71% +11%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
8624 Points ∼66% +4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
8451 Points ∼65% +2%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
8304 Points ∼64%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=106)
5447 Points ∼100% +174%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
  (1990 - 2536, n=16)
2309 Points ∼42% +16%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
1990 Points ∼37%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=487)
10846 Points ∼100% +60%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
10511 Points ∼97% +55%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
  (6792 - 8376, n=38)
7743 Points ∼71% +14%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i5-8300H
7740 Points ∼71% +14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
7682 Points ∼71% +13%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
7192 Points ∼66% +6%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
6792 Points ∼63%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
6262 Points ∼58% -8%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
74599 Points ∼100% +60%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=472)
64345 Points ∼86% +38%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
51337 Points ∼69% +10%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i5-8300H
50387 Points ∼68% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
  (43721 - 53978, n=37)
50013 Points ∼67% +7%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
47895 Points ∼64% +3%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
46618 Points ∼62%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
34407 Points ∼46% -26%
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 326.3237.1174.780fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 259.7200.5180.571.9fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 11669.74023.1fps
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 95.99274.969.3fps
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) 107.847.647.544fps
Hitman 2 (2018) 60.843.137.833.4fps
Fallout 76 (2018) 6050.344.143.1fps
Battlefield V (2018) 65.853.244.539.5fps
Farming Simulator 19 (2018) 163.1124.879.160.1fps
Darksiders III (2018) 116.660.244.738.9fps
Just Cause 4 (2018) 65.640.934.633.2fps
BioShock Infinite | The Witcher 3 | Farming Simulator 19 | Just Cause 4 | Call of Duty Black Ops 4
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
102 fps ∼100% +42%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.7 - 266, n=301)
92.6 fps ∼91% +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
  (61 - 97, n=23)
73.2 fps ∼72% +2%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
71.9 fps ∼70%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
61 fps ∼60% -15%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 194, n=222)
81.6 fps ∼100% +104%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
50 fps ∼61% +25%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
48.7 fps ∼60% +22%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
46.4 fps ∼57% +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
  (21.3 - 51.9, n=26)
45.1 fps ∼55% +13%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
42.9 fps ∼53% +7%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
40 fps ∼49%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
33.2 fps ∼41% -17%
Farming Simulator 19 - 1920x1080 Very High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (13.6 - 131, n=5)
78.3 fps ∼100% +30%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
60.1 fps ∼77%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
  (59.3 - 60.1, n=2)
59.7 fps ∼76% -1%
MSI GE72 7RE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
59.3 (min: 50) fps ∼76% -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
27 fps ∼34% -55%
Just Cause 4 - 1920x1080 Medium / Off AF:4x
Average of class Gaming
  (8.9 - 161, n=9)
77.1 fps ∼100% +89%
MSI GE72 7RE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
50.3 (min: 45) fps ∼65% +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
  (40.9 - 54, n=3)
48.4 fps ∼63% +18%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
40.9 fps ∼53%
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 - 1920x1080 Very High / On
Average of class Gaming
  (35.5 - 131, n=11)
75.8 fps ∼100% +72%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
44 fps ∼58%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
  (35.5 - 47.7, n=4)
41.2 fps ∼54% -6%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
37.7 fps ∼50% -14%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
35.5 (min: 26, max: 45) fps ∼47% -19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
20.3 fps ∼27% -54%
05101520253035404550Tooltip
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD; The Witcher 3: Ø40 (34-44)

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
30.6 / 30.6 / 33.2 dB(A)
Lecteur DVD
0 / dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
42.8 / 43 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.233.731.431.836.22533.830.233.630.733.83132.33231.632.932.3403228.931.130.2325029.63132.23029.66331.831.328.927.831.88027.32827.727.427.310025.926.426.126.525.912526.226.225.625.826.216026.326.524.825.326.320026.826.223.922.726.825027.327.722.722.727.331528.829.422.32228.840028.429.324.92128.450028.328.622.220.128.363028.528.420.619.828.580031.431.22618.931.4100032.432.423.318.332.4125031.531.721.31831.5160034.134.421.718.134.1200031.832.219.717.931.8250034.234.619.718.134.2315031.331.319.118.131.3400030.630.41918.330.650002626.719.118.426630023.123.118.818.623.1800020.720.718.918.820.71000019.819.918.818.819.81250019.519.218.718.619.5160002019.319.118.720SPL42.84333.230.942.8N3.83.91.71.33.8median 28.3median 28.4median 21.3median 18.8median 28.3Delta3.33.22.91.73.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)		Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
2700U, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)		Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)		HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q		Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)		Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)		Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
2%
-3%
-2%
-7%
7%
-1%
-3%
off / environment *
30.6
29
5%
30
2%
28.3
8%
29
5%
28
8%
29.4 (27.7 - 30.9, n=32)
4%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=264)
4%
Idle Minimum *
30.6
29
5%
30
2%
32.2
-5%
29
5%
28
8%
30.7 (28 - 34, n=35)
-0%
31.5 (28 - 41.7, n=687)
-3%
Idle Average *
30.6
31
-1%
32
-5%
32.4
-6%
34
-11%
28
8%
31.7 (28 - 35, n=35)
-4%
32.8 (28 - 46.6, n=687)
-7%
Idle Maximum *
33.2
32
4%
33
1%
32.4
2%
43
-30%
28.5
14%
33.8 (28.5 - 44, n=35)
-2%
34.7 (28 - 51, n=687)
-5%
Load Average *
42.8
36
16%
42
2%
40.2
6%
44
-3%
34.9
18%
41.3 (32.7 - 50, n=35)
4%
40.5 (30.3 - 58, n=688)
5%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42.1
44
-5%
46
-9%
45
-7%
44
-5%
40
5%
Load Maximum *
43
46
-7%
49
-14%
47.2
-10%
48
-12%
49.6
-15%
47.2 (40.8 - 53, n=35)
-10%
47.8 (38.9 - 64.1, n=688)
-11%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

A pleine charge
 40.6 °C26.3 °C44.1 °C 
 35.7 °C43.4 °C40.6 °C 
 27.9 °C27 °C30.6 °C 
Maximum: 44.1 °C
Moyenne: 35.1 °C
53.8 °C52 °C46.5 °C
35.9 °C35.9 °C36.3 °C
25.6 °C26.5 °C29.4 °C
Maximum: 53.8 °C
Moyenne: 38 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  42 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 23 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.8 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 41.8 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-1.9 °C / -3.4 F).
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)		Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
2700U, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)		Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)		HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q		Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)		Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)		Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-4%
-22%
-11%
5%
-18%
-5%
-10%
Maximum Upper Side *
44.1
47
-7%
52
-18%
46
-4%
45
-2%
42.8
3%
46.5 (30 - 58.6, n=36)
-5%
45.7 (28 - 68.8, n=652)
-4%
Maximum Bottom *
53.8
44
18%
55
-2%
52
3%
43
20%
52
3%
48.4 (36.4 - 59.4, n=36)
10%
49.2 (25.9 - 78, n=650)
9%
Idle Upper Side *
24.6
30
-22%
36
-46%
29
-18%
25
-2%
32
-30%
28.6 (22.2 - 36, n=35)
-16%
30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=603)
-25%
Idle Bottom *
26.7
28
-5%
32
-20%
33
-24%
26
3%
39.4
-48%
28.9 (22.1 - 39.4, n=35)
-8%
31.5 (21.1 - 50.3, n=601)
-18%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.731.833.72531.630.731.6313332.9334030.830.230.85029.93029.96328.827.828.88027.327.427.310027.126.527.112528.225.828.216041.725.341.720043.922.743.925041.622.741.631550.32250.340060.32160.35006020.16063064.719.864.780066.318.966.3100066.418.366.4125068.81868.816006418.164200065.117.965.1250065.518.165.5315064.318.164.3400065.418.365.4500064.218.464.2630066.618.666.6800070.418.870.41000065.818.865.81250056.418.656.41600054.918.754.9SPL77.930.977.9N39.41.339.4median 64.2median 18.8median 64.2Delta8.51.78.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ngApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.36 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.3 / 0.3 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 5.5 / 8.5 / 11.9 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 94 / 144 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)		Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
2700U, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)		Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)		HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q		Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)		Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)		Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-14%
5%
-10%
12%
-4%
-19%
-128%
Idle Minimum *
5.5
7
-27%
5
9%
6
-9%
4
27%
4.5
18%
7.92 (3.8 - 14.6, n=36)
-44%
19.8 (3.5 - 113, n=647)
-260%
Idle Average *
8.5
10
-18%
7
18%
11.2
-32%
7
18%
10
-18%
11.9 (6.6 - 20, n=36)
-40%
25.4 (6.8 - 119, n=647)
-199%
Idle Maximum *
11.9
18
-51%
11
8%
13.3
-12%
11
8%
13.8
-16%
15.4 (8.1 - 25, n=36)
-29%
30.4 (8.3 - 122, n=647)
-155%
Load Average *
94
79
16%
91
3%
89.2
5%
72
23%
92.5
2%
85.1 (57.6 - 114, n=36)
9%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=638)
-11%
Load Maximum *
144
128
11%
137
5%
134.5
7%
158
-10%
123.2
14%
130 (100 - 163, n=36)
10%
169 (21.9 - 590, n=637)
-17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
86
98
-14%
97
-13%
101.9
-18%
79
8%
108.1
-26%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)