Notebookcheck

Test du Huawei P Smart Z : smartphone du milieu de gamme avec appareil photo rétractable

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduit par Prévots), 06/19/2019

Petites bordures pour grand écran. L’appareil photo rétractable arrive dans le milieu de gamme. Le P Smart Z de Huawei combine des fonctionnalités premium, tel cet appareil photo pop-up, avec un prix du secteur du milieu de gamme. Cependant, la réalisation Huawei n’est pas toujours réussie, et laisse de la marge de progression.

Huawei P Smart Z 2019 (P Gamme)
Processeur
HiSilicon Kirin 710
Carte graphique
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Mémoire
4096 Mo 
Écran
6.59 pouces 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 391 PPP, capacitif multi-touch, LCD IPS, brillant: oui
Disque dur
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 Go 
, 52.2 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD jusqu'à 512 Go, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: boussole, accéléromètre, gyroscope, capteur de proximité, OTG, Miracast, appels WiFi
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM : 850, 900, 1 800, 1 900, UMTS: 850, 900, 1 900, 2 100, LTE : 800, 850, 900, 1 800, 2 100, 2 300, 2 500, 2 600 (MHz), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.8 x 163.5 x 77.3
Batterie
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymère, Autonomie de la batterie (selon les données du fabricant): 773 h, Autonomie de la batterie en communication 2G (selon les données du fabricant): 28 h
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 16 MPix double : 16MP (f/1,8) + 2MP (f/2,4), appareil photo2 API : limité
Appareil photo secondaire: 16 MPix f/2,0, rétractable
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, écouteurs, chargeur, câble USB, outil pour carte SIM, guide de démarrage rapide, carte de garantie, EMUI 9.0, 24 Mois Garantie, DAS : 0,84 W/kg (tête), LTE Cat.12 (600 Mbit/s / 100 Mbit/s), DRM Widevine : L1, fanless
Poids
197 g, Alimentation: 53 g
Prix
300 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Test Huawei P Smart Z smartphone

Comparaison des tailles

163.5 mm 77.3 mm 8.8 mm 197 g158.5 mm 74.7 mm 7.7 mm 166 g157 mm 75.3 mm 8.3 mm 176 g156 mm 68 mm 8.4 mm 162 g152.9 mm 72.7 mm 7.4 mm 159 g147.5 mm 70.5 mm 7.45 mm 155 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 (min: 326, max: 341) MBit/s ∼100% +75%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
332 (min: 314, max: 341) MBit/s ∼99% +74%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
311 (min: 214, max: 346) MBit/s ∼93% +63%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 278, max: 302) MBit/s ∼88% +54%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=409)
222 MBit/s ∼66% +16%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
191 (min: 143, max: 217) MBit/s ∼57%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
188 (min: 45, max: 237) MBit/s ∼56% -2%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
288 (min: 138, max: 294) MBit/s ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
279 (min: 229, max: 303) MBit/s ∼97% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
272 (min: 250, max: 285) MBit/s ∼94% +28%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
253 (min: 128, max: 283) MBit/s ∼88% +19%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
218 (min: 95, max: 239) MBit/s ∼76% +3%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
212 (min: 194, max: 237) MBit/s ∼74%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=409)
212 MBit/s ∼74% 0%
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Huawei P Smart Z
GPS Huawei P Smart Z
GPS Huawei P Smart Z
GPS Huawei P Smart Z
GPS Huawei P Smart Z
GPS Huawei P Smart Z
Huawei P Smart Z | mode photo.
Huawei P Smart Z | mode photo.
Huawei P Smart Z | Aperture mode.
Huawei P Smart Z | Aperture mode.
Huawei P Smart Z | AI mode photo.
Huawei P Smart Z | AI mode photo.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
Huawei P Smart Z
Huawei P Smart Z
Huawei P Smart Z
Huawei P Smart Z
439
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
411
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 449 cd/m² Moyenne: 430.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.07 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 92 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 439 cd/m²
Contraste: 1219:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 8.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
96.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.18
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.59
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.97
Huawei P30 Lite
IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.15
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2
Sony Xperia 10
IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6
Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Screen
47%
16%
-2%
20%
41%
Brightness middle
439
583
33%
451
3%
537
22%
547
25%
644
47%
Brightness
431
577
34%
430
0%
525
22%
525
22%
628
46%
Brightness Distribution
92
97
5%
90
-2%
85
-8%
93
1%
91
-1%
Black Level *
0.36
0.55
-53%
0.58
-61%
0.36
-0%
Contrast
1219
820
-33%
926
-24%
1519
25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.4
1.6
75%
1.4
78%
6.41
-0%
4.6
28%
2.64
59%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.1
3.9
68%
4.4
64%
10.86
10%
12.1
-0%
9.23
24%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8.6
2.7
69%
2.5
71%
6.7
22%
3.9
55%
2.5
71%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.27 97%
2.22 99%
2.099 105%
2.17 101%
2.024 109%
CCT
9021 72%
6267 104%
6422 101%
8310 78%
7158 91%
6649 98%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9429 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
21.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 9.2 ms hausse
↘ 12.4 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (25.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
40.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 18.4 ms hausse
↘ 22 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (40.2 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3813 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
7282 Points ∼100% +91%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3551 Points ∼49% -7%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4287 Points ∼59% +12%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3763 Points ∼52% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4913 Points ∼67% +29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (3133 - 4083, n=8)
3609 Points ∼50% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=307)
4559 Points ∼63% +20%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5497 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5975 Points ∼100% +9%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5429 Points ∼91% -1%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4992 Points ∼84% -9%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3986 Points ∼67% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5605 Points ∼94% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5266 - 5615, n=8)
5473 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=362)
4549 Points ∼76% -17%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1563 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1875 Points ∼100% +20%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1544 Points ∼82% -1%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1337 Points ∼71% -14%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
837 Points ∼45% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1721 Points ∼92% +10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1523 - 1614, n=8)
1564 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=364)
1354 Points ∼72% -13%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6929 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
6832 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6483 Points ∼94% -6%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6277 Points ∼91% -9%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5987 Points ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5827 Points ∼84% -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5803 - 7141, n=8)
5649 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=357)
4997 Points ∼72% -28%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
9424 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
8346 Points ∼89% -11%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8125 Points ∼86% -14%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7618 Points ∼81% -19%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4948 Points ∼53% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7029 Points ∼75% -25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (7004 - 9424, n=8)
8159 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=525)
5466 Points ∼58% -42%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2789 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2550 Points ∼91% -9%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1664 Points ∼60% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2266 Points ∼81% -19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1851 - 2789, n=9)
2362 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=372)
1830 Points ∼66% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
840 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼100% +155%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
843 Points ∼39% 0%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
792 Points ∼37% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1188 Points ∼55% +41%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (470 - 1194, n=9)
822 Points ∼38% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=372)
1598 Points ∼74% +90%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
993 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼100% +123%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
981 Points ∼44% -1%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
896 Points ∼40% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1328 Points ∼60% +34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (563 - 1351, n=9)
957 Points ∼43% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=375)
1484 Points ∼67% +49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2723 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼92% -8%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2578 Points ∼95% -5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1732 Points ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2241 Points ∼82% -18%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1656 - 2723, n=9)
2377 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=386)
1805 Points ∼66% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1378 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼98% +56%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1336 Points ∼61% -3%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1299 Points ∼59% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1553 Points ∼71% +13%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (740 - 1378, n=9)
1215 Points ∼55% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=386)
2194 Points ∼100% +59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1534 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼100% +45%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1494 Points ∼67% -3%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1375 Points ∼62% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1667 Points ∼75% +9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (844 - 1534, n=9)
1361 Points ∼61% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=387)
1860 Points ∼84% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2668 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼93% -7%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2489 Points ∼93% -7%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1645 Points ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2351 Points ∼88% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1924 - 2716, n=9)
2452 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=448)
1760 Points ∼66% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
856 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼100% +131%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
819 Points ∼41% -4%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
704 Points ∼36% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1149 Points ∼58% +34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (457 - 856, n=9)
735 Points ∼37% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=450)
1324 Points ∼67% +55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
990 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼100% +109%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
963 Points ∼46% -3%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
809 Points ∼39% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1296 Points ∼63% +31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (550 - 990, n=9)
868 Points ∼42% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=458)
1262 Points ∼61% +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2654 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼93% -7%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2490 Points ∼94% -6%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1687 Points ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2432 Points ∼92% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1907 - 2654, n=9)
2436 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=480)
1667 Points ∼63% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1327 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼100% +49%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1256 Points ∼63% -5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1235 Points ∼62% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1279 Points ∼65% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (568 - 1327, n=9)
1061 Points ∼54% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=480)
1801 Points ∼91% +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1490 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼100% +39%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1414 Points ∼68% -5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1315 Points ∼63% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1430 Points ∼69% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (673 - 1490, n=9)
1208 Points ∼58% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=488)
1541 Points ∼74% +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
22668 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13686 Points ∼60% -40%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12023 Points ∼53% -47%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15766 Points ∼70% -30%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
12437 Points ∼55% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14353 Points ∼63% -37%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11158 - 22668, n=8)
15042 Points ∼66% -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=640)
13636 Points ∼60% -40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
22605 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
43514 Points ∼100% +92%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21643 Points ∼50% -4%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20953 Points ∼48% -7%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
17878 Points ∼41% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16593 Points ∼38% -27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12426 - 22605, n=8)
20033 Points ∼46% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11427 - 162695, n=640)
19988 Points ∼46% -12%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
22168 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
29316 Points ∼100% +32%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
18377 Points ∼63% -17%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19525 Points ∼67% -12%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
16290 Points ∼56% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16037 Points ∼55% -28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12120 - 22168, n=8)
18433 Points ∼63% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11565 - 83518, n=641)
16573 Points ∼57% -25%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
39 fps ∼53%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
74 fps ∼100% +90%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
33 fps ∼45% -15%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps ∼49% -8%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
29 fps ∼39% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
39 fps ∼53% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (33 - 39, n=8)
37.6 fps ∼51% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=669)
35 fps ∼47% -10%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
35 fps ∼60%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +66%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
31 fps ∼53% -11%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼60% 0%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
25 fps ∼43% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps ∼62% +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (31 - 36, n=8)
34.8 fps ∼60% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=672)
26.9 fps ∼46% -23%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21 fps ∼58%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
36 fps ∼100% +71%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
17 fps ∼47% -19%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼44% -24%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
13 fps ∼36% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼64% +10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (17 - 21, n=8)
20.3 fps ∼56% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=588)
19.3 fps ∼54% -8%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼58%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +74%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
16 fps ∼48% -16%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼45% -21%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
11 fps ∼33% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼64% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (16 - 19, n=8)
18.4 fps ∼56% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=593)
17.8 fps ∼54% -6%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
14 fps ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
26 fps ∼100% +86%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼46% -14%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼38% -29%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
9.5 fps ∼37% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼54% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12 - 14, n=8)
13.6 fps ∼52% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=449)
15.9 fps ∼61% +14%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +100%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
11 fps ∼46% -8%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps ∼41% -18%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
7.8 fps ∼33% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼54% +8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11 - 13, n=8)
12.5 fps ∼52% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=452)
15.2 fps ∼63% +27%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.2 fps ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
9.1 fps ∼100% +314%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.2 fps ∼46% +91%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2 fps ∼22% -9%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2.7 fps ∼30% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 fps ∼54% +123%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2.2 - 7, n=8)
4.23 fps ∼46% +92%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=152)
8.97 fps ∼99% +308%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3.5 fps ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5.8 fps ∼94% +66%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps ∼42% -26%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.3 fps ∼37% -34%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1.7 fps ∼27% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps ∼50% -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2.6 - 3.5, n=8)
2.78 fps ∼45% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=152)
6.2 fps ∼100% +77%
Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.7 fps ∼34%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps ∼100% +198%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps ∼46% +36%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.6 fps ∼40% +19%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.4 fps ∼31% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps ∼59% +74%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 6.9, n=8)
5.88 fps ∼42% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=154)
13.5 fps ∼96% +187%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5.7 fps ∼36%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +181%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼44% +23%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps ∼34% -5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.9 fps ∼31% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9 fps ∼56% +58%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 7, n=8)
6.23 fps ∼39% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=153)
14.8 fps ∼93% +160%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.7 fps ∼51%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
15 fps ∼100% +95%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.9 fps ∼46% -10%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼42% -18%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5.3 fps ∼35% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼59% +16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (6.9 - 7.7, n=8)
7.55 fps ∼50% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=378)
10.7 fps ∼71% +39%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.1 fps ∼55%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps ∼100% +83%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.5 fps ∼50% -8%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼46% -15%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.3 fps ∼33% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼62% +14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (6.4 - 7.1, n=8)
6.74 fps ∼52% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=382)
9.65 fps ∼74% +36%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
140131 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
179353 Points ∼100% +28%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
132834 Points ∼74% -5%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
117557 Points ∼66% -16%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
88287 Points ∼49% -37%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
144194 Points ∼80% +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (124870 - 140188, n=8)
134634 Points ∼75% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=270)
130378 Points ∼73% -7%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1194 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1172 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1024 Points ∼86% -14%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
815 Points ∼68% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
927 Points ∼78% -22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (982 - 1212, n=8)
1110 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=600)
741 Points ∼62% -38%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1489 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3453 Points ∼100% +132%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1478 Points ∼43% -1%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1409 Points ∼41% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1957 Points ∼57% +31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1450 - 1489, n=8)
1467 Points ∼42% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=600)
1942 Points ∼56% +30%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3013 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2969 Points ∼90% -1%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3036 Points ∼92% +1%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
983 Points ∼30% -67%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2492 Points ∼76% -17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2823 - 4360, n=8)
3289 Points ∼100% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=600)
1446 Points ∼44% -52%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5267 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5932 Points ∼100% +13%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5146 Points ∼87% -2%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3159 Points ∼53% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5112 Points ∼86% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4826 - 5568, n=8)
5249 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=600)
2852 Points ∼48% -46%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2301 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2906 Points ∼100% +26%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2201 Points ∼76% -4%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1374 Points ∼47% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2193 Points ∼75% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2140 - 2445, n=8)
2280 Points ∼78% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=604)
1418 Points ∼49% -38%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.214 Points ∼100% +16%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019 (Chrome 74)
32.095 Points ∼86%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
31.781 Points ∼85% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30.2 - 32.1, n=3)
31.4 Points ∼84% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (14.6 - 108, n=79)
30.7 Points ∼82% -4%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
16.254 Points ∼44% -49%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
13562 Points ∼100% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
10322 Points ∼76% 0%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019 (Chrome 74)
10288 Points ∼76%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
9779 Points ∼72% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (9041 - 10288, n=8)
9542 Points ∼70% -7%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
8368 Points ∼62% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=661)
6268 Points ∼46% -39%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
4865 Points ∼36% -53%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=681)
10805 ms * ∼100% -163%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
10256.9 ms * ∼95% -150%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
4776 ms * ∼44% -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3999 - 4310, n=8)
4172 ms * ∼39% -2%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
4137.8 ms * ∼38% -1%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019 (Chrome 74)
4103 ms * ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
3897 ms * ∼36% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
2911.8 ms * ∼27% +29%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Huawei P Smart Z 2019Xiaomi Mi 9 SEHuawei P30 LiteMotorola Moto G7 PlusSony Xperia 10Samsung Galaxy A50Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
3%
-5%
-4%
-19%
-3%
-26%
-39%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
62.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
63.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-10%
56.3 (58.4 - 74.7, n=100)
-17%
48.6 (9.5 - 87.1, n=403)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
83.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
73.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
74.3 (76.1 - 87.2, n=100)
-3%
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=403)
-13%
Random Write 4KB
77.98
21.86
-72%
87.29
12%
73.1
-6%
14.39
-82%
18.2
-77%
24.3 (3.4 - 88.2, n=109)
-69%
20.1 (0.14 - 250, n=711)
-74%
Random Read 4KB
94.07
115.83
23%
71.57
-24%
76.6
-19%
53.12
-44%
98.9
5%
54.3 (11.4 - 149, n=109)
-42%
44.8 (1.59 - 175, n=711)
-52%
Sequential Write 256KB
191.75
190.1
-1%
158.63
-17%
208.7
9%
232.87
21%
192.1
0%
171 (40 - 246, n=109)
-11%
92.1 (2.99 - 503, n=711)
-52%
Sequential Read 256KB
304.32
492.48
62%
293.23
-4%
283.6
-7%
273.8
-10%
507.3
67%
272 (95.6 - 704, n=109)
-11%
258 (12.1 - 1468, n=711)
-15%
 42.7 °C42.9 °C41.2 °C 
 42.4 °C41.2 °C41.2 °C 
 40.2 °C40.2 °C40.5 °C 
Maximum: 42.9 °C
Moyenne: 41.4 °C
36.5 °C38.2 °C41.2 °C
35.5 °C38.5 °C41.3 °C
36 °C38.5 °C41.2 °C
Maximum: 41.3 °C
Moyenne: 38.5 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  29.2 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.836.42525.5303127.525.24022.333.75028.531.16318.9298020.22510021.621.412518.723.416020.237.920017.144.525014.647.531515.952.940015.456.950016.56263014.265.280014.571.5100013.372.1125013.472.1160013.671.3200014.270250014.672.2315013.676.7400014.479.2500014.571.8630014.268.8800014.670.51000014.868.31250014.9511600015.244.1SPL26.585.1N0.859.3median 14.6median 68.3Delta0.811.832.53931.931.522.324.821.721.929.228.426.724.920.324.420.526.52325.315.64517.849.116.359.115.461.515.963.515.864.213.367.914.165.914.171.41469.713.567.813.46913.972.314.271.713.967.114.672.914.267.714.766.31568.214.955.415.33826.481.50.852.7median 14.7median 66.30.98.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P Smart Z 2019Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.08 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.85 / 2.4 / 2.43 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 4.62 / 7.44 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
42%
-2%
-0%
18%
7%
0%
15%
Idle Minimum *
0.85
0.53
38%
0.91
-7%
1.1
-29%
0.72
15%
0.8
6%
0.948 (0.8 - 1.3, n=9)
-12%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=743)
-4%
Idle Average *
2.4
1.18
51%
2.41
-0%
1.7
29%
2.16
10%
1.5
37%
2.11 (1.2 - 2.5, n=9)
12%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=742)
28%
Idle Maximum *
2.43
1.2
51%
2.43
-0%
2.1
14%
2.17
11%
1.7
30%
2.44 (2.2 - 3.6, n=9)
-0%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=743)
17%
Load Average *
4.62
3.04
34%
4.57
1%
5.1
-10%
3.32
28%
5.9
-28%
4.66 (4.06 - 6, n=9)
-1%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=737)
12%
Load Maximum *
7.44
4.83
35%
7.57
-2%
7.9
-6%
5.34
28%
8.3
-12%
7.38 (6.13 - 9.1, n=9)
1%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=737)
21%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 26min
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3
746
510
-32%
515
-31%
715
-4%
541
-27%
701
-6%

Points positifs

+ bordures d'écran étroites
+ design
+ autonomie
+ GPS précis
+ stockage eMMC rapide

Points négatifs

- ...mais pas la version UFS
- toucher du dos en plastique
- SoC pas toujours suffisant au quotidien
- WLAN lent
- peu de bandes LTE compatibles
- photographie en faible luminosité

Verdict

En test : le Huawei P Smart Z. Modèle de test fourni par Huawei Allemagne.
En test : le Huawei P Smart Z. Modèle de test fourni par Huawei Allemagne.

Le Huawei P Smart Z se distingue de ses nombreux concurrents du milieu de gamme grâce à son design sans bordures. Cela sans encoche ni trou à l’écran, mais grâce à un module photo rétractable. Cependant, au-delà de ce système, le P Smart Z ne possède aucun avantage qui lui permettrait de se différencier de la foule des Android du milieu de gamme. Pire, à cause de sa conception, il faudra accepter des désavantages ergonomiques significatifs. Enfin, la qualité de construction du P Smart Z n’est pas des meilleures.

Le module photo rétractable du Huawei P Smart Z attire l’attention. Ceux qui pourront vivre avec les défauts de l’appareil auront un solide smartphone du milieu de gamme qui a belle allure.

La qualité de l’écran et du capteur photo ne nous ont ainsi pas convaincus. Même si le capteur photo frontal a été retiré de l’écran, et devrait de ce fait avoir plus d’espace disponible, le capteur pourrait vraiment faire mieux.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Huawei P Smart Z 2019 - 06/17/2019 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Châssis
82%
Clavier
67 / 75 → 89%
Dispositif de pointage
88%
Connectivité
44 / 60 → 73%
Poids
88%
Autonomie
95%
Écran
83%
Performances en jeu
50 / 63 → 79%
Performances dans les applications
69 / 70 → 98%
Chauffe
85%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Appareil photo
63%
Moyenne
75%
84%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Huawei P Smart Z : smartphone du milieu de gamme avec appareil photo rétractable
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-06-19 (Update: 2019-06-19)