Notebookcheck

Test du Huawei P Smart Pro : le smartphone le moins utile de 2020

Nouveau, mais trop familier. Le Huawei P Smart Pro est l'appareil-type proposé par Huawei l'an dernier. Et Honor a en plus déjà proposé un autre modèle qui ressemble à s'y méprendre au P Smart Pro. Découvrez dans ce rapport de test du P Smart Pro comment ce smartphone du milieu de gamme avec appareil photo rétractable se comporte, et s'il vaut d'être acheté.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Stefanie Voigt (traduit par Prévots),
Huawei P smart Pro (P Gamme)
Processeur
HiSilicon Kirin 710 8 x 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53
Carte graphique
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Mémoire
6144 Mo 
Écran
6.59 pouces 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 391 PPP, capacitif, TFT-LCD (LTPS), brillant: oui, 60 Hz
Disque dur
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 Go 
, 113 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD jusqu'à 512 Go, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: gyroscope, boussole, capteur de gravité, Miracast, OTG
Réseau
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, bandes 4G : 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, bandes 3G : 1, 5, 8, bandes 2G : 2, 3, 5, 8, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.8 x 163.1 x 77.2
Batterie
4000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 48 MPix (f/1,8) + 8 MP (ultra grand-angle, ouverture f/2,4) + 2 MP ( ouverture f/2,4) + autofocus (focus à détection de phase), API Camera2 : limité
Appareil photo secondaire: 16 MPix F/2,2
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, chargeur modulaire 10 W, câble USB C, coque TPU, guide de démarrage rapide, outil pour carte SIM, protection d'écran TP, EMUI 9, 24 Mois Garantie, DAS : tête 0,92 W\kg, corps 0,98 W\kg, Widevine L1, fanless
Poids
206 g, Alimentation: 56 g
Prix
279 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Appareils du comparatif

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Drive
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
77 %
07/20
Huawei P smart Pro
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
206 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.59"2340x1080
81 %
05/20
Huawei P40 Lite
Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6
183 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2310x1080
82 %
03/20
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
208 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
82 %
02/20
Samsung Galaxy A71
SD 730, Adreno 618
179 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.7"2400x1080
81 %
07/19
Xiaomi Mi 9T
SD 730, Adreno 618
191 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.39"2340x1080
76 %
11/19
Honor 9X
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
197 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.59"2340x1080

Comparaison des tailles

165.3 mm 76.6 mm 8.79 mm 208 g163.5 mm 77.3 mm 8.8 mm 197 g163.1 mm 77.2 mm 8.8 mm 206 g163.6 mm 76 mm 7.7 mm 179 g159.2 mm 76.3 mm 8.7 mm 183 g156.7 mm 74.3 mm 8.8 mm 191 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
687 (345min - 697max) MBit/s ∼100% +1520%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
338 (295min - 356max) MBit/s ∼49% +697%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Adreno 618, SD 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
333 (297min - 343max) MBit/s ∼48% +685%
Huawei P40 Lite
Mali-G52 MP6, Kirin 810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
298 (61min - 334max) MBit/s ∼43% +603%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=600)
282 MBit/s ∼41% +565%
Honor 9X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
170 (156min - 179max) MBit/s ∼25% +301%
Huawei P smart Pro
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
42.4 MBit/s ∼6%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (280min - 399max) MBit/s ∼100% +562%
Huawei P40 Lite
Mali-G52 MP6, Kirin 810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 (286min - 403max) MBit/s ∼99% +556%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
317 (151min - 367max) MBit/s ∼93% +516%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Adreno 618, SD 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
293 (161min - 346max) MBit/s ∼86% +469%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=600)
268 MBit/s ∼79% +420%
Honor 9X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
142 (118min - 160max) MBit/s ∼42% +176%
Huawei P smart Pro
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
51.5 (19min - 90max) MBit/s ∼15%
0102030405060708090Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø45.4 (1-57)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø51.5 (19-90)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Huawei P smart Pro
GPS Huawei P smart Pro
GPS Huawei P smart Pro
GPS Huawei P smart Pro
GPS Huawei P smart Pro
GPS Huawei P smart Pro

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3Scene 4
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker
21.1 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
25.1 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
29 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
12 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
25.1 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei P smart Pro: 20.65 ∆E min: 11.84 - max: 29.48 ∆E
ColorChecker
7.3 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
5 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei P smart Pro: 5.19 ∆E min: 2.15 - max: 10.79 ∆E
456
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
424
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 487 cd/m² Moyenne: 458.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.3 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 87 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 480 cd/m²
Contraste: 1021:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 7.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Huawei P smart Pro
TFT-LCD (LTPS), 2340x1080, 6.59
Huawei P40 Lite
IPS, 2310x1080, 6.4
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
LCD IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy A71
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
Xiaomi Mi 9T
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Honor 9X
LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.59
Screen
17%
37%
41%
42%
2%
Brightness middle
480
478
0%
658
37%
629
31%
589
23%
494
3%
Brightness
459
448
-2%
643
40%
646
41%
589
28%
483
5%
Brightness Distribution
87
87
0%
93
7%
95
9%
96
10%
94
8%
Black Level *
0.47
0.49
-4%
0.49
-4%
0.51
-9%
Contrast
1021
976
-4%
1343
32%
969
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.7
3
47%
1.8
68%
2.7
53%
2.5
56%
5.74
-1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.3
5.6
50%
4.4
61%
6
47%
4.9
57%
10.26
9%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.8
4.1
47%
3.8
51%
3
62%
1.6
79%
7.3
6%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.26 97%
2.22 99%
2.1 105%
2.24 98%
2.086 105%
CCT
8813 74%
7282 89%
6255 104%
6340 103%
6544 99%
8572 76%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 17520 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
28 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 10 ms hausse
↘ 18 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 60 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (24.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
51.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 21.2 ms hausse
↘ 30 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (38.7 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
867 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1035 Points ∼62% +19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
867 Points ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=67)
1668 Points ∼100% +92%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
983 Points ∼39%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2493 Points ∼100% +154%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1212 Points ∼49% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
861 Points ∼35% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
983 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=62)
1789 Points ∼72% +82%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1356 Points ∼69%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
1949 Points ∼100% +44%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1520 Points ∼78% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1647 Points ∼84% +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1320 - 1356, n=2)
1338 Points ∼68% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=122)
1956 Points ∼100% +44%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
330 Points ∼55%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
604 Points ∼100% +83%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
569 Points ∼94% +72%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
542 Points ∼90% +64%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (330 - 331, n=2)
331 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=122)
556 Points ∼92% +68%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
3896 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8591 Points ∼100% +121%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7795 Points ∼91% +100%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2631 - 4083, n=11)
3514 Points ∼41% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=358)
4916 Points ∼57% +26%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
5443 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6213 Points ∼90% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6871 Points ∼100% +26%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5266 - 5615, n=11)
5454 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13589, n=421)
5027 Points ∼73% -8%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1554 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2689 Points ∼100% +73%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2527 Points ∼94% +63%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1523 - 1614, n=11)
1560 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4965, n=421)
1539 Points ∼57% -1%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6993 Points ∼70%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
9164 Points ∼92% +31%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9989 Points ∼100% +43%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7773 Points ∼78% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7533 Points ∼75% +8%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7018 Points ∼70% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5803 - 7141, n=12)
6497 Points ∼65% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=525)
5982 Points ∼60% -14%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
9854 Points ∼82%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
12070 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
10689 Points ∼89% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
8885 Points ∼74% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9049 Points ∼75% -8%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
9509 Points ∼79% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (7004 - 9854, n=13)
8380 Points ∼69% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=683)
6565 Points ∼54% -33%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2977 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2588 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2445 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2786 Points ∼94%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2345 Points ∼79%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2196 - 2345, n=6)
2293 Points ∼77%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=176)
2670 Points ∼90%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2552 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3167 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1731 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1917 Points ∼61%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
801 Points ∼25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (796 - 1220, n=6)
924 Points ∼29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 9104, n=176)
3088 Points ∼98%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2636 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2978 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1851 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2060 Points ∼69%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
938 Points ∼31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (927 - 1365, n=6)
1061 Points ∼36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=176)
2746 Points ∼92%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2478 Points ∼62%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3972 Points ∼100% +60%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2965 Points ∼75% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2827 Points ∼71% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3241 Points ∼82% +31%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2579 Points ∼65% +4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1851 - 2789, n=15)
2350 Points ∼59% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=528)
2235 Points ∼56% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
875 Points ∼25%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2752 Points ∼77% +215%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3554 Points ∼100% +306%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2085 Points ∼59% +138%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2176 Points ∼61% +149%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
844 Points ∼24% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (470 - 1194, n=15)
831 Points ∼23% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 10043, n=528)
2173 Points ∼61% +148%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
991 Points ∼29%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2954 Points ∼87% +198%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3412 Points ∼100% +244%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2214 Points ∼65% +123%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2347 Points ∼69% +137%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
992 Points ∼29% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (563 - 1351, n=15)
965 Points ∼28% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8386, n=529)
2026 Points ∼59% +104%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2496 Points ∼62%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
4003 Points ∼100% +60%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3198 Points ∼80% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2702 Points ∼67% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3296 Points ∼82% +32%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2598 Points ∼65% +4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1656 - 2723, n=15)
2358 Points ∼59% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=560)
2150 Points ∼54% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1342 Points ∼25%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3488 Points ∼65% +160%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5367 Points ∼100% +300%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3101 Points ∼58% +131%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3316 Points ∼62% +147%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1350 Points ∼25% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (740 - 1378, n=15)
1250 Points ∼23% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=560)
2926 Points ∼55% +118%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1508 Points ∼32%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3591 Points ∼77% +138%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4643 Points ∼100% +208%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3002 Points ∼65% +99%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3312 Points ∼71% +120%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1525 Points ∼33% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (844 - 1534, n=15)
1395 Points ∼30% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=560)
2454 Points ∼53% +63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2456 Points ∼67%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3676 Points ∼100% +50%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3256 Points ∼89% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3210 Points ∼87% +31%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3227 Points ∼88% +31%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2549 Points ∼69% +4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1924 - 2716, n=15)
2429 Points ∼66% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=609)
2112 Points ∼57% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
845 Points ∼26%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2740 Points ∼83% +224%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3287 Points ∼100% +289%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2296 Points ∼70% +172%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2008 Points ∼61% +138%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
848 Points ∼26% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (457 - 857, n=15)
755 Points ∼23% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 9167, n=609)
1833 Points ∼56% +117%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
999 Points ∼30%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2904 Points ∼89% +191%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3277 Points ∼100% +228%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2451 Points ∼75% +145%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2192 Points ∼67% +119%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
995 Points ∼30% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (550 - 1002, n=15)
891 Points ∼27% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7678, n=610)
1742 Points ∼53% +74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2487 Points ∼68%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3638 Points ∼100% +46%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3432 Points ∼94% +38%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2792 Points ∼77% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3239 Points ∼89% +30%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2536 Points ∼70% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1907 - 2654, n=15)
2422 Points ∼67% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=652)
1982 Points ∼54% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1335 Points ∼26%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3384 Points ∼66% +153%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5115 Points ∼100% +283%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2999 Points ∼59% +125%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3184 Points ∼62% +139%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1333 Points ∼26% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (568 - 1355, n=15)
1072 Points ∼21% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 13305, n=651)
2428 Points ∼47% +82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1489 Points ∼32%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3437 Points ∼74% +131%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4654 Points ∼100% +213%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2950 Points ∼63% +98%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3196 Points ∼69% +115%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1490 Points ∼32% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (673 - 1503, n=15)
1218 Points ∼26% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9611, n=654)
2080 Points ∼45% +40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
22398 Points ∼81%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
27654 Points ∼100% +23%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23203 Points ∼84% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
21898 Points ∼79% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
19433 Points ∼70% -13%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
22492 Points ∼81% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11158 - 22668, n=12)
16572 Points ∼60% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=796)
15601 Points ∼56% -30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2177 Points ∼3%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
47563 Points ∼69% +2085%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
68634 Points ∼100% +3053%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
52600 Points ∼77% +2316%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
46605 Points ∼68% +2041%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21792 Points ∼32% +901%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2177 - 22605, n=12)
18746 Points ∼27% +761%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=794)
27343 Points ∼40% +1156%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
21876 Points ∼46%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
41003 Points ∼86% +87%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
47824 Points ∼100% +119%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
40105 Points ∼84% +83%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
35557 Points ∼74% +63%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21943 Points ∼46% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12120 - 22168, n=12)
19147 Points ∼40% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=794)
21234 Points ∼44% -3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
39 fps ∼41%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
89 fps ∼94% +128%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
95 fps ∼100% +144%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼88% +115%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
77 fps ∼81% +97%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
39 fps ∼41% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (33 - 39, n=12)
37.6 fps ∼40% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=797)
46 fps ∼48% +18%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
35 fps ∼41%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
59 fps ∼69% +69%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
86 fps ∼100% +146%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
59 fps ∼69% +69%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
58 fps ∼67% +66%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
35 fps ∼41% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (31 - 36, n=12)
34.6 fps ∼40% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=806)
31.5 fps ∼37% -10%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
18 fps ∼33%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
53 fps ∼98% +194%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
54 fps ∼100% +200%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼76% +128%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼70% +111%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21 fps ∼39% +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (17 - 21, n=12)
20 fps ∼37% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=702)
27.3 fps ∼51% +52%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
14 fps ∼27%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
52 fps ∼100% +271%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
48 fps ∼92% +243%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
37 fps ∼71% +164%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼65% +143%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼37% +36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (14 - 19, n=12)
17.9 fps ∼34% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=710)
22.8 fps ∼44% +63%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
14 fps ∼38%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
33 fps ∼89% +136%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
37 fps ∼100% +164%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼81% +114%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼73% +93%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
14 fps ∼38% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12 - 14, n=12)
13.6 fps ∼37% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=565)
21.9 fps ∼59% +56%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
12 fps ∼35%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
34 fps ∼100% +183%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
33 fps ∼97% +175%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼79% +125%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
24 fps ∼71% +100%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼35% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11 - 13, n=12)
12.3 fps ∼36% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=567)
19.8 fps ∼58% +65%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2.3 fps ∼18%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
13 fps ∼100% +465%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.9 fps ∼68% +287%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼77% +335%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9.3 fps ∼72% +304%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.3 fps ∼18% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2.2 - 7, n=13)
3.92 fps ∼30% +70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=321)
11.5 fps ∼88% +400%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
4 fps ∼31%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
7.9 fps ∼61% +98%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼100% +225%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6.7 fps ∼52% +68%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6.1 fps ∼47% +53%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4 fps ∼31% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2.6 - 4, n=13)
2.92 fps ∼22% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=319)
8.16 fps ∼63% +104%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.1 fps ∼29%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
21 fps ∼100% +244%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼100% +244%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼76% +162%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼71% +146%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.1 fps ∼29% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 6.9, n=13)
6.03 fps ∼29% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=325)
17.2 fps ∼82% +182%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
7 fps ∼30%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
21 fps ∼91% +200%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23 fps ∼100% +229%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼78% +157%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼70% +129%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼30% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 7, n=13)
6.52 fps ∼28% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=324)
19.7 fps ∼86% +181%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
7.7 fps ∼37%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
19 fps ∼90% +147%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼100% +173%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼81% +121%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼76% +108%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.7 fps ∼37% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (6.4 - 7.7, n=12)
7.49 fps ∼36% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=490)
14.7 fps ∼70% +91%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.4 fps ∼32%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
20 fps ∼100% +213%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
19 fps ∼95% +197%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼75% +134%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13 fps ∼65% +103%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.5 fps ∼33% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (6.4 - 7.3, n=12)
6.74 fps ∼34% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=494)
13 fps ∼65% +103%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
194475 Points ∼60%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
319383 Points ∼98% +64%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
298925 Points ∼92% +54%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
247507 Points ∼76% +27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (185725 - 194475, n=2)
190100 Points ∼58% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 622888, n=119)
325169 Points ∼100% +67%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23.1 (11.15min - 38.98max) fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16.91 fps ∼73%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (10.3 - 10.3, n=2)
10.3 fps ∼45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.73 - 85.6, n=74)
19.1 fps ∼83%
Vulkan Medium Native (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
fps ∼0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13.56 fps ∼85%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (7.26 - 9.43, n=2)
8.35 fps ∼52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=64)
16 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21.97 (12.98min - 44.43max) fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15.51 fps ∼71%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (7.38 - 8, n=2)
7.69 fps ∼35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=62)
19.9 fps ∼91%
VRMark - Amber Room (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3258 Score ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2000 Score ∼61%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (961 - 1146, n=3)
1047 Score ∼32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=89)
2609 Score ∼80%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1179 Points ∼86%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
1267 Points ∼92% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1378 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1103 Points ∼80% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1099 Points ∼80% -7%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1090 Points ∼79% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (982 - 1212, n=13)
1092 Points ∼79% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=736)
827 Points ∼60% -30%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1476 Points ∼29%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
4339 Points ∼85% +194%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5087 Points ∼100% +245%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3175 Points ∼62% +115%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3559 Points ∼70% +141%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1478 Points ∼29% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1450 - 1489, n=13)
1470 Points ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=736)
2556 Points ∼50% +73%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2913 Points ∼55%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
4726 Points ∼90% +62%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5278 Points ∼100% +81%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3466 Points ∼66% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
4646 Points ∼88% +59%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2948 Points ∼56% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2823 - 4360, n=13)
3181 Points ∼60% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=736)
1903 Points ∼36% -35%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
5134 Points ∼72%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
7178 Points ∼100% +40%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6870 Points ∼96% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6426 Points ∼90% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6760 Points ∼94% +32%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5297 Points ∼74% +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4826 - 5568, n=13)
5208 Points ∼73% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=736)
3504 Points ∼49% -32%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2258 Points ∼57%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3695 Points ∼93% +64%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3990 Points ∼100% +77%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2972 Points ∼74% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3329 Points ∼83% +47%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2240 Points ∼56% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2140 - 2445, n=13)
2255 Points ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=736)
1793 Points ∼45% -21%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
55.352 Points ∼100% +68%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
53.145 Points ∼96% +61%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
47.131 Points ∼85% +43%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=195)
41.1 Points ∼74% +25%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
36.578 Points ∼66% +11%
Huawei P smart Pro (Chrome 74)
32.998 Points ∼60%
Honor 9X (Chrome 78)
32.916 Points ∼59% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30 - 33, n=8)
31.5 Points ∼57% -5%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
94.778 Points ∼100%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
91.154 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
87.488 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
65.293 Points ∼69%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (47 - 55.1, n=10)
50.2 Points ∼53%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=626)
47.7 Points ∼50%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
54.9 runs/min ∼100%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
53.2 runs/min ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
46.46 runs/min ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=177)
43 runs/min ∼78%
Honor 9X (Chrome 78)
33.9 runs/min ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
32.8 runs/min ∼60%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30.4 - 33.9, n=6)
31.9 runs/min ∼58%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
97 Points ∼100% +45%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
86 Points ∼89% +28%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
80 Points ∼82% +19%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=263)
70.1 Points ∼72% +5%
Huawei P smart Pro (Chrome 74)
67 Points ∼69%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (52 - 69, n=11)
61.7 Points ∼64% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
60 Points ∼62% -10%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
18809 Points ∼100% +78%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
17925 Points ∼95% +70%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
17501 Points ∼93% +66%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
12771 Points ∼68% +21%
Huawei P smart Pro (Chrome 74)
10544 Points ∼56%
Honor 9X (Chrome 78)
9851 Points ∼52% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (9041 - 10544, n=13)
9659 Points ∼51% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=794)
7973 Points ∼42% -24%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1854 - 59466, n=820)
9698 ms * ∼100% -129%
Huawei P smart Pro (Chrome 74)
4233.8 ms * ∼44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3999 - 4853, n=13)
4223 ms * ∼44% -0%
Honor 9X (Chrome 78)
4123.4 ms * ∼43% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
3435.5 ms * ∼35% +19%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
2787 ms * ∼29% +34%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
2563.9 ms * ∼26% +39%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
2471.6 ms * ∼25% +42%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Huawei P smart ProHuawei P40 LiteXiaomi Redmi K30 5GSamsung Galaxy A71Xiaomi Mi 9THonor 9XAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
5%
-1%
-20%
-24%
-1%
-6%
-44%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
68.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
70.6 (Nano Memory Card)
2%
57.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-17%
67.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
58.8 (8.4 - 72.4, n=33)
-15%
51.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=536)
-26%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.63 (Nano Memory Card)
8%
73.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
76.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
74 (13.4 - 88.3, n=33)
-3%
69.1 (8.1 - 96.5, n=536)
-10%
Random Write 4KB
156.34
175.45
12%
100.99
-35%
109.57
-30%
107.82
-31%
159.3
2%
111 (18.2 - 290, n=61)
-29%
36.9 (0.14 - 319, n=892)
-76%
Random Read 4KB
154.29
157.32
2%
96.8
-37%
112.25
-27%
128.65
-17%
142.32
-8%
145 (96.8 - 239, n=61)
-6%
60.1 (1.59 - 324, n=892)
-61%
Sequential Write 256KB
195.43
181.69
-7%
312.76
60%
192.38
-2%
179.19
-8%
196.1
0%
245 (182 - 511, n=61)
25%
130 (2.99 - 911, n=892)
-33%
Sequential Read 256KB
821.6
912.99
11%
889.67
8%
493.04
-40%
492.74
-40%
860.34
5%
770 (427 - 999, n=61)
-6%
347 (12.1 - 1802, n=892)
-58%
 38.5 °C38.9 °C39.4 °C 
 38 °C37.6 °C39.1 °C 
 37.1 °C38.1 °C38.9 °C 
Maximum: 39.4 °C
Moyenne: 38.4 °C
35 °C35.5 °C36.2 °C
34.9 °C35.6 °C36.4 °C
34.2 °C35.9 °C36.2 °C
Maximum: 36.4 °C
Moyenne: 35.5 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  28.8 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.834.52526.225.83123.320.84021.921.7502828.46319.924.58019.119.210019.918.412516.525.116019.638.620017.54625017.550.631513.954.740013.958.950015.86463015.268.68001471.210001473.4125013.973.3160013.472.1200013.871.1250014.373.331501476.7400014.579.9500014.674.9630014.571.5800014.769.91000015.171.9125001555.41600014.844.5SPL26.586N0.863.9median 14.6median 69.9Delta111.137.22924.428.927.324.822.723.23333.526.72623.426.42125.517.62818.245.514.744.51549.81653.715.756.314.461.614.362.514.26914.272.513.874.214.974.814.574.914.675.214.374.814.47614.976.414.473.814.6731573.815.167.515.55726.785.90.863.8median 14.7median 690.611.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P smart ProXiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P smart Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.05 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.98 / 2.36 / 2.41 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 4.12 / 7.8 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P smart Pro
4000 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite
4200 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A71
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T
4000 mAh
Honor 9X
4000 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
16%
-6%
21%
45%
-57%
-3%
14%
Idle Minimum *
0.98
0.79
19%
0.66
33%
0.63
36%
0.54
45%
2.3
-135%
1.058 (0.8 - 2.3, n=13)
-8%
0.891 (0.2 - 3.4, n=897)
9%
Idle Average *
2.36
2.14
9%
2.37
-0%
1.49
37%
0.95
60%
3
-27%
2.2 (1.2 - 3, n=13)
7%
1.756 (0.6 - 6.2, n=896)
26%
Idle Maximum *
2.41
2.23
7%
2.42
-0%
1.51
37%
1.08
55%
4.2
-74%
2.57 (2.2 - 4.2, n=13)
-7%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=897)
15%
Load Average *
4.12
3.6
13%
6.8
-65%
4.62
-12%
2.7
34%
5.3
-29%
4.61 (4.06 - 6, n=13)
-12%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=891)
-0%
Load Maximum *
7.8
5.17
34%
7.5
4%
7.11
9%
5.4
31%
9.4
-21%
7.6 (6.13 - 9.4, n=13)
3%
6.11 (1.2 - 14.2, n=891)
22%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 37min
Huawei P smart Pro
4000 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite
4200 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A71
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T
4000 mAh
Honor 9X
4000 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3
757
1007
33%
802
6%
815
8%
991
31%
832
10%

Points positifs

+ stockage UFS
+ design
+ double SIM
+ prise jack
+ autonomie

Points négatifs

- vitesse WLAN
- absence de NFC
- GPS
- écran LCD
- Android 9
- nombre de bandes LTE
- tactile
- absence de UHD pour les vidéos
- patchs de sécurité anciens

Verdict

En test : le Huawei P Smart Pro. Modèle de test fourni par NBB.com.
En test : le Huawei P Smart Pro. Modèle de test fourni par NBB.com.

De notre point de vue, il n'est pas très clair pourquoi le fabriquant chinois propose de façon répétée une évolution du P Smart Z, le Honor 9X de l'an dernier étant déjà un Huawei P Smart Z avec une mise à jour du stockage et un appareil photo légèrement amélioré.

Le Prix du Huawei P Smart Pro ne suffit pas à rendre l'appareil intéressant.

La question qui se pose est pourquoi ne pas choisir un Honor 9X, dont le prix est descendu de plus de 100 €, ce qui le rend bien plus intéressant que le P Smart Pro. Et il n'est pas équipé d'un module Wifi ultra lent.

Malheureusement, le smartphone Huawei n'intègre toujours pas le NFC, ce qui serait un plus vu le niveau de prix. Ainsi, il ne peut toujours pas proposer des fonctionnalités comme le paiement sans-fil. De plus, le P Smart Pro ne possède pas Android 9, ce qui n'est pas courant, ainsi que des patchs de sécurité datés. Mais au moins les services Google tel que le Play Store sont préinstallés.

Ceux qui recherchent un smartphone du milieu de gamme peuvent regarder du côté du Xiaomi Redmi K30.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Huawei P smart Pro - 05/18/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Châssis
80%
Clavier
67 / 75 → 89%
Dispositif de pointage
87%
Connectivité
38 / 70 → 54%
Poids
88%
Autonomie
89%
Écran
82%
Performances en jeu
12 / 64 → 19%
Performances dans les applications
62 / 86 → 72%
Chauffe
88%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 88%
Appareil photo
60%
Moyenne
72%
77%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Huawei P Smart Pro : le smartphone le moins utile de 2020
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-07-19 (Update: 2020-07-19)