Notebookcheck

Courte critique du PC portable Acer Nitro 5 (7700HQ, GTX 1050 Ti)

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (traduit par JBP), 12/08/2017

Entrée de gamme fin pour joueur. Le portable de jeu fin d’Acer propose un écran IPS et un SSD NVMe rapide, ainsi qu’une bonne autonomie.

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E (Nitro 5 Gamme)
Processeur
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop) - 4096 Mo, Processeur: 1493-1734 MHz, Mémoire: 1752 MHz, GDDR5, 128 bits, ForceWare 385.41, Optimus
Mémoire
8192 Mo 
, DDR4-2400, double canal, deux emplacements sur deux utilisés
Écran
15.6 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPP, LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK6, IPS, brillant: non
Carte mère
Intel HM175
Disque dur
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, 256 Go 
, + WDC WD10SPZX (1 To, 5 400 tr/min), 1140 Go libres
Carte son
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connexions
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: combo audio jack, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: SD, TPM 2.0
Réseau
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Qualcomm QCA6174 (a/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 26.75 x 390 x 266
Batterie
48 Wh, 3220 mAh Lithium-Ion, 15,2 V
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: HD
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, MS Office 365 (essai), 24 Mois Garantie
Poids
2.7 kg, Alimentation: 563 g
Prix
1299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

Côté gauche : verrou de sécurité, ethernet Gigabit, USB C 3.1 Gen A, HDMI, USB A 3.1 Gen 1, lecteur de carte SD.
Côté gauche : verrou de sécurité, ethernet Gigabit, USB C 3.1 Gen A, HDMI, USB A 3.1 Gen 1, lecteur de carte SD.
Côté droit : combo audio jack, 2 USB A 2.0, entrée secteur.
Côté droit : combo audio jack, 2 USB A 2.0, entrée secteur.
Arrière : pas de connectivité.
Arrière : pas de connectivité.
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
686 MBit/s ∼100% +14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Qualcomm QCA6174
603 MBit/s ∼88%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
541 MBit/s ∼79% -10%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
533 MBit/s ∼78% -12%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
517 MBit/s ∼75% -14%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
307 MBit/s ∼45% -49%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)
246 MBit/s ∼36% -59%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
664 MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
653 MBit/s ∼98% +9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Qualcomm QCA6174
600 MBit/s ∼90%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
533 MBit/s ∼80% -11%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
513 MBit/s ∼77% -14%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)
306 MBit/s ∼46% -49%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
282 MBit/s ∼42% -53%
256
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
252
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
270
cd/m²
270
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
269
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 276 cd/m² Moyenne: 264.6 cd/m² Minimum: 25 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 91 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 281 cd/m²
Contraste: 1104:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.06 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 6.25 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
62% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 1.76
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
TN, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus FX502VM-AS73
TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Medion Erazer X6603
AH-IPS, LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-24%
16%
-34%
-66%
9%
-32%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
35 (16, 19)
42 (20.4, 21.6)
-20%
22 (10, 12)
37%
36 (17, 19)
-3%
58.8 (33.6, 25.2)
-68%
28.4 (11.2, 17.2)
19%
46 (36, 10)
-31%
Response Time Black / White *
22 (12, 10)
28 (16.4, 11.6)
-27%
23 (13, 10)
-5%
36 (19, 17)
-64%
36 (23.6, 12.4)
-64%
22.4 (6, 16.4)
-2%
29 (17, 12)
-32%
PWM Frequency
21550 (99)
2174 (90)
Screen
7%
-3%
-54%
-29%
-33%
-15%
Brightness middle
276
230
-17%
281
2%
246
-11%
239
-13%
209.5
-24%
252
-9%
Brightness
265
228
-14%
257
-3%
235
-11%
244
-8%
205
-23%
246
-7%
Brightness Distribution
91
88
-3%
85
-7%
75
-18%
88
-3%
92
1%
94
3%
Black Level *
0.25
0.21
16%
0.32
-28%
0.55
-120%
0.35
-40%
0.69
-176%
0.23
8%
Contrast
1104
1095
-1%
878
-20%
447
-60%
683
-38%
304
-72%
1096
-1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.06
4.01
21%
5.16
-2%
10.97
-117%
7.3
-44%
4.7
7%
7.83
-55%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.13
7.26
28%
9.09
10%
24.7
-144%
19.7
-94%
15.5
-53%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.25
3.18
49%
4.57
27%
14.25
-128%
4.9
22%
1.8
71%
7.11
-14%
Gamma
1.76 125%
2.52 87%
2.59 85%
1.83 120%
2.19 100%
2.23 99%
2.19 100%
CCT
6873 95%
6814 95%
6931 94%
11200 58%
7332 89%
6975 93%
7930 82%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
40
37
-7%
37
-7%
35
-12%
35
-12%
36.2
-9%
35
-12%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
62
58
-6%
58
-6%
55
-11%
55
-11%
56.6
-9%
55
-11%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-9% / 2%
7% / -0%
-44% / -50%
-48% / -35%
-12% / -26%
-24% / -18%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 52 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 8943 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

CalMAN : ColorChecker.
CalMAN : ColorChecker.
CalMAN : échelle de gris.
CalMAN : échelle de gris.
CalMAN : saturation des couleurs.
CalMAN : saturation des couleurs.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
22 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 12 ms hausse
↘ 10 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (25.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
35 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 16 ms hausse
↘ 19 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (41 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit - CoolBoost switched off (lower curve), CoolBoost switched on (upper curve)
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5908
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6614
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
22209
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.71 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.26 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
67.3 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
100.59 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
699 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
162 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Aide
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
162 Points ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (CoolBoost on)
162 Points ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼99% -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points ∼98% -2%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points ∼93% -7%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points ∼93% -7%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
140 Points ∼86% -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
736 Points ∼100% +1%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points ∼99% +1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (CoolBoost on)
727 Points ∼99%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
699 Points ∼95% -4%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
725 Points ∼99% 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
724 Points ∼98% 0%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
719 Points ∼98% -1%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
652 Points ∼89% -10%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼100% +6%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.72 Points ∼95% +1%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.72 Points ∼95% +1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.71 Points ∼94%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.67 Points ∼92% -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.16 Points ∼100% +12%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.13 Points ∼100% +12%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.99 Points ∼98% +10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.26 Points ∼89%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.12 Points ∼87% -2%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5908 Points ∼100%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5823 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5660 Points ∼96% -4%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22209 Points ∼100%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21939 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21376 Points ∼96% -4%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
13991 Points ∼100%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
3585 Points ∼100%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
14084 Points ∼100%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
4482 Points ∼100%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
14975 Points ∼100%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
4540 Points ∼100%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 38.14393.1066.0)
269.86 Points ∼100% +3%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 40.15063.0.0)
266.93 Points ∼99% +2%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
266.34 Points ∼99% +2%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (EDGE 38.1439.3.00)
261.28 Points ∼97% 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 40)
261.18 Points ∼97%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 38.14393.0.0)
218.49 Points ∼81% -16%
PCMark 7 Score
6346 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4177 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5291 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5096 points
Aide
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5129 Points ∼100% +1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
5096 Points ∼99%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
5068 Points ∼99% -1%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4442 Points ∼87% -13%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3141 Points ∼61% -38%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
2722 Points ∼53% -47%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4765 Points ∼100% +14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
4177 Points ∼88%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4165 Points ∼87% 0%
Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4119 Points ∼86% -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
3850 Points ∼81% -8%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3565 Points ∼75% -15%
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
Sequential Read: 945.1 MB/s
Sequential Write: 558.8 MB/s
512K Read: 638.6 MB/s
512K Write: 560.8 MB/s
4K Read: 24.24 MB/s
4K Write: 122.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 288.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 503.5 MB/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Asus FX502VM-AS73
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Medion Erazer X6603
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
75%
-95%
-30%
64%
-40%
63%
Write 4k QD32
503.5
557.2
11%
0.893
-100%
255.1
-49%
392.9
-22%
99.74
-80%
398.7
-21%
Read 4k QD32
288.5
650.4
125%
0.718
-100%
279.6
-3%
457.7
59%
369.9
28%
464
61%
Write 4k
122.7
176.9
44%
0.846
-99%
85.44
-30%
146.4
19%
70.91
-42%
147.2
20%
Read 4k
24.24
62.63
158%
0.327
-99%
27.11
12%
58.93
143%
29.36
21%
59.04
144%
Write 512
560.8
807.1
44%
28.31
-95%
304
-46%
822
47%
137.8
-75%
831.3
48%
Read 512
638.6
805.9
26%
28.33
-96%
338.9
-47%
785.8
23%
343.5
-46%
788.2
23%
Write Seq
558.8
1208
116%
100.6
-82%
422.8
-24%
1202
115%
138.2
-75%
1100
97%
Read Seq
945.1
1657
75%
101.5
-89%
485.8
-49%
2170
130%
502.5
-47%
2170
130%
3DMark 06 Standard
27190 points
3DMark 11 Performance
9084 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
124922 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
20260 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6648 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
3554 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
2446 points
Aide
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 1700
15264 Points ∼100% +62%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
14732 Points ∼97% +56%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
9909 Points ∼65% +5%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
9768 Points ∼64% +3%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
9725 Points ∼64% +3%
Medion Erazer X6603
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
9518 Points ∼62% +1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ (CoolBoost on)
9450 Points ∼62%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
9357 Points ∼61% -1%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), AMD FX-9830P
7794 Points ∼51% -18%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7731 Points ∼51% -18%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7461 (min: 7273, max: 7576) Points ∼49% -21%
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000
AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5557 Points ∼36% -41%
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5304 Points ∼35% -44%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
11633 Points ∼100% +51%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 1700
11010 Points ∼95% +43%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7821 Points ∼67% +2%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7791 Points ∼67% +1%
Medion Erazer X6603
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7694 Points ∼66% 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ (CoolBoost on)
7683 Points ∼66%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7666 Points ∼66% 0%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7682 Points ∼66% 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7646 Points ∼66% 0%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6166 Points ∼53% -20%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6032 (min: 6004, max: 6035) Points ∼52% -21%
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5885 Points ∼51% -23%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), AMD FX-9830P
5062 Points ∼44% -34%
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4314 Points ∼37% -44%
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000
AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
4041 Points ∼35% -47%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
80496 Points ∼100% +59%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 1700
68629 Points ∼85% +35%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
50981 Points ∼63% +1%
Medion Erazer X6603
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
50793 Points ∼63% 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
50713 Points ∼63%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ (CoolBoost on)
50196 Points ∼62% -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
49539 Points ∼62% -2%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
47250 Points ∼59% -7%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
46362 Points ∼58% -9%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
39507 Points ∼49% -22%
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
37388 Points ∼46% -26%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
37128 (min: 36802, max: 37178) Points ∼46% -27%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), AMD FX-9830P
31294 Points ∼39% -38%
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000
AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
27941 Points ∼35% -45%
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
27075 Points ∼34% -47%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 (CoolBoost on)
10832 Points ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
9704 Points ∼90% -10%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Physics
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 (CoolBoost on)
7511 Points ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
6532 Points ∼87% -13%
3DMark 06 - CPU - ---
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 (CoolBoost on)
7569 Points ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
7184 Points ∼95% -5%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 (CoolBoost on)
8723 Points ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
8295 Points ∼95% -5%
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 423.3304.5196.389fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 260.7206.7185.874.1fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 141.186.347.424.2fps
Prey (2017) 142.5102.682.866.8fps
Rocket League (2017) 247.6178.5111.3fps
Dirt 4 (2017) 249.9114.559.636.1fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 12658.851.535.9fps
F1 2017 (2017) 178917144fps
Ark Survival Evolved (2017) 94.931.322.714.6fps
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
103.1 fps ∼100% +39%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
74.1 fps ∼72%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
74 fps ∼72% 0%
Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
73.9 fps ∼72% 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
72.8 fps ∼71% -2%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
70.7 fps ∼69% -5%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
48.3 fps ∼100% +2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
47.4 fps ∼98%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
45.8 (min: 30) fps ∼95% -3%
Prey - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:2TX SM AF:16x
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
66.8 fps ∼100%

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
30.6 / 30.7 / 30.7 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
43 / 45.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
Asus FX502VM-AS73
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Medion Erazer X6603
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
Noise
-11%
3%
-2%
3%
-3%
3%
off / environment *
30.6
30
2%
30.4
1%
30.3
1%
27.7
9%
28.7
6%
30.9
-1%
Idle Minimum *
30.6
32
-5%
31.4
-3%
30.9
-1%
30.5
-0%
30.6
-0%
30.9
-1%
Idle Average *
30.7
34
-11%
31.4
-2%
30.9
-1%
30.5
1%
30.6
-0%
30.9
-1%
Idle Maximum *
30.7
36
-17%
31.4
-2%
31
-1%
30.6
-0%
31
-1%
31.6
-3%
Load Average *
43
48
-12%
36.8
14%
46.5
-8%
40
7%
46.2
-7%
38.5
10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
39.7
49
-23%
40
-1%
Load Maximum *
45.8
51
-11%
41.3
10%
46.8
-2%
42.6
7%
52.3
-14%
40.8
11%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.735.535.735.537.72536.334.234.938.636.33145.637.746.948.245.64037.731.938.435.637.75035.834.1383435.86329.930.831.532.229.98030.429.526.728.230.410026.427.526.92726.412526.12825.224.326.116030.125.623.523.230.120027.726.523.622.827.725028.127.322.222.328.131531.729.820.921.531.740030.428.519.820.230.450028.626.919.619.228.663030.22819.118.930.280030.52918.518.430.5100033.832.618.117.933.8125033.831.217.71833.8160037.134.817.717.637.1200036.734.21817.536.7250035.732.61817.935.7315035.532.418.21835.5400033.829.718.218.233.8500033.429.118.518.533.4630029.225.118.718.629.2800027.924.118.718.827.91000024.421.918.818.724.41250021.720.718.918.921.71600020.622.519.219.120.6SPL45.843.130.730.745.8N5.24.21.51.55.2median 30.2median 28median 18.8median 18.8median 30.2Delta3.62.41.81.83.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAcer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
 39.4 °C41.1 °C33.1 °C 
 35.1 °C37 °C27.1 °C 
 23.5 °C25.5 °C23.9 °C 
Maximum: 41.1 °C
Moyenne: 31.7 °C
34.8 °C38.8 °C29.2 °C
23.5 °C31.9 °C28 °C
23.6 °C23.4 °C24 °C
Maximum: 38.8 °C
Moyenne: 28.6 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  45.2 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 41.7 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+1.1 °C / 2 F).
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
Asus FX502VM-AS73
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Medion Erazer X6603
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
Heat
-20%
-9%
6%
-15%
-23%
3%
Maximum Upper Side *
41.1
52.4
-27%
47
-14%
43.4
-6%
46.8
-14%
53.2
-29%
44.3
-8%
Maximum Bottom *
38.8
54.2
-40%
47
-21%
37.7
3%
55.8
-44%
56.8
-46%
39.5
-2%
Idle Upper Side *
28.7
30.5
-6%
28.4
1%
24.3
15%
27.6
4%
28.8
-0%
24.8
14%
Idle Bottom *
26.9
28.2
-5%
27.1
-1%
23.6
12%
28.4
-6%
31.4
-17%
24.6
9%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204235.5422545.838.645.8314248.2424037.135.637.15041.43441.46336.532.236.58030.528.230.510029.52729.512536.424.336.41604623.24620050.122.850.125050.922.350.931558.721.558.740063.820.263.850060.319.260.363057.318.957.380067.818.467.8100064.317.964.3125059.81859.8160060.617.660.6200063.817.563.8250062.117.962.1315059.91859.9400061.518.261.550005618.556630055.418.655.4800059.218.859.21000058.318.758.31250054.418.954.4160004919.149SPL73.630.773.6N33.31.533.3median 58.7median 18.8median 58.7Delta5.11.85.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788EApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.25 / 0.4 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 4.1 / 6.9 / 9.5 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 83 / 126 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
Asus FX502VM-AS73
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Medion Erazer X6603
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
Power Consumption
-32%
-32%
2%
-21%
-97%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
4.1
6
-46%
7
-71%
4.4
-7%
8.5
-107%
14.9
-263%
4.7
-15%
Idle Average *
6.9
11
-59%
10.2
-48%
6.8
1%
9.1
-32%
15.1
-119%
7.6
-10%
Idle Maximum *
9.5
18
-89%
14
-47%
8.3
13%
9.7
-2%
15.2
-60%
9.2
3%
Load Average *
83
81
2%
78
6%
81
2%
79.9
4%
105.8
-27%
81
2%
Load Maximum *
126
146
-16%
127
-1%
127
-1%
121.5
4%
148.8
-18%
112
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
108
90
17%
97.7
10%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
14h 53min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 40)
6h 40min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
5h 9min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
1h 03min
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 48 Wh
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 63.3 Wh
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 52.5 Wh
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 74 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 45 Wh
Asus FX502VM-AS73
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 64 Wh
Medion Erazer X6603
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 45 Wh
Autonomie de la batterie
3%
-20%
41%
-37%
-29%
-38%
Reader / Idle
893
765
-14%
322
-64%
1174
31%
509
-43%
363
-59%
340
-62%
H.264
309
196
-37%
455
47%
227
-27%
WiFi v1.3
400
428
7%
302
-24%
622
56%
240
-40%
277
-31%
257
-36%
Load
63
97
54%
81
29%
81
29%
46
-27%
64
2%
46
-27%

Points positifs

+ écran bien contrasté
+ Full HD
+ SSD NVMe rapide
+ bonne autonomie
+ Wifi ac
+ USB C
+ trappes de maintenance

Points négatifs

- écran peu lumineux
En test : l'Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E. Modèle de test fourni par Acer Allemagne.
En test : l'Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E. Modèle de test fourni par Acer Allemagne.

"PC portable puissant pour du jeu occasionnel." Voici comment Acer présente le Nitro 5 dans une description très juste. Le processeur Core i7 est assez puissant pour tous les types d’utilisation. Combiné avec la carte graphique GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, l’appareil peut faire tourner fluidement tous les jeux récents sur l’écran mat Full HD. Mais il faudra renoncer aux réglages les plus élevés - le GPU n’est pas fait pour cela.

Le Nitro 5 est un bon appareil polyvalent, orienté pour le jeu.

Mais l’appareil fait également du bon boulot pour une utilisation classique (bureautique, Internet). Il ne fait pratiquement pas de bruit en cas de faibles sollicitations et au repos, et il chauffe peu même avec des sollicitations plus importantes. De plus, l’appareil possède un clavier rétroéclairé qui convient à des séances régulières de rédaction, et une bonne autonomie. Le SSD rapide permet au système d’être réactif, tandis qu’un disque dur de 2,5 pouces lui permet de compter sur un stockage abondant.

L’écran mat IPS possède des angles de vue stables et un bon contraste. Cependant la luminosité pourrait être meilleure. Nous pensons également que le constructeur aurait dû mieux faire en termes de connectivité. Pour environ 1 200 €, un port Thunderbolt 3 et un DisplayPort auraient dû être inclus. Les nuisances sonores élevées du ventilateur en cas de fortes sollicitations devraient aussi être abaissées.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E - 08/07/2018 v6
Sascha Mölck

Châssis
79 / 98 → 81%
Clavier
81%
Dispositif de pointage
81%
Connectivité
51 / 81 → 63%
Poids
59 / 10-66 → 87%
Autonomie
85%
Écran
85%
Performances en jeu
91%
Performances dans les applications
94%
Chauffe
92 / 95 → 97%
Nuisance sonore
83 / 90 → 92%
Audio
63%
Appareil photo
35 / 85 → 42%
Moyenne
75%
82%
Gaming - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du PC portable Acer Nitro 5 (7700HQ, GTX 1050 Ti)
Sascha Mölck, 2017-12- 8 (Update: 2017-12- 8)