Test du Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro : SoC orienté jeu et appareil photo 64 MP

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Brand: Xiaomi

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Felivitas Krohn (traduit par Prévots), 11/20/2019

Smartphone du milieu de gamme pour joueurs ? Sur le papier, le Redmi Note 8 Pro possède tout ce dont il a besoin pour être le nouveau chef de file des smartphones du milieu de gamme. Mais le nouveau MediaTek Helio G90T tient-il ses promesses ? Vous aurez la réponse en lisant ce rapport de test.

Exemplaire de test fourni par TradingShenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Redmi Note Gamme)

Processeur

Mediatek Helio G90T

Carte graphique

ARM Mali-G76 MP4

Mémoire

6144 Mo

Écran

6.53 pouces 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 395 PPP, capacitif, Prise en charge native d'une utilisation avec un stylet, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, brillant: oui

Disque dur

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 Go

, , 109.6 Go libres

Connexions

1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrarouge, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD (256 Go), 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: boussole, accéléromètre, gyroscope, capteur de proximité, USB C, OTG, Miracast, LED de notification

Réseau

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850 / 900 / 1 800 / 1 900), 3G (B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B8), 4G (B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B20 / B28 / B38 / B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Taille

Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.79 x 161.35 x 76.4

Batterie

4500 mAh Lithium-Polymère

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Système d'exploitation

Android 9.0 Pie

Appareil photo

Appareil photo primaire: 64 MPix Quad : 64 MP (f/1,9, 26mm, 1 / 1,7", 0,8 µm) + 8 MP (f/2,2, 13mm, 1 / 4", 1,12µm) + 2 MP (f/2,4, 1 / 5", 1,75µm) + 2 MP (f/2,4, 1 / 5", 1,75µm), appareil photo2 API : Full
Appareil photo secondaire: 20 MPix f/2,0, 0,9 µm

Fonctionnalités additionnelles

Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, câble USB, adaptateur secteur modulaire, coque en silicone, MiUI, 12 Mois Garantie, DAS : 0,997 W/kg tête, 1,466 W/kg corps, DRM Widevine : L1 (EU) L3 (Chine), fanless

Poids

200 g, Alimentation: 61 g

Prix

250 euros

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

voir toutes les spécifications

Appareils du comparatif

Note	Date	Modèle	Poids	Drive	Taille	Résolution
81%	11/19	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4	200 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.53"	2340x1080
88%	05/19	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 712, Adreno 616	155 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	5.97"	2340x1080
84%	04/19	Sony Xperia 10 630, Adreno 508	162 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6"	2520x1080
78%	05/19	Huawei P30 Lite Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4	159 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.15"	2312x1080
79%	11/19	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 665, Adreno 610	190 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.3"	2340x1080
79%	05/19	Samsung Galaxy A40 7904, Mali-G71 MP2	140 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	5.9"	2340x1080
80%	05/19	Samsung Galaxy A50 Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3	166 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.4"	2340x1080

Comparaison des tailles

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Sony Xperia 10 Huawei P30 Lite Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Samsung Galaxy A40

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	353 (min: 330, max: 362) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Adreno 610, 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash	339 (min: 320, max: 349) MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Sony Xperia 10 Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	334 (min: 326, max: 341) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	311 (min: 214, max: 346) MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 939, n=456)	230 MBit/s ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Mali-G71 MP2, 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash	222 (min: 203, max: 243) MBit/s ∼63% -37%
Huawei P30 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	188 (min: 45, max: 237) MBit/s ∼53% -47%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	319 (min: 302, max: 325) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Adreno 610, 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash	303 (min: 242, max: 355) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	279 (min: 229, max: 303) MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Mali-G71 MP2, 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash	268 (min: 244, max: 288) MBit/s ∼84% -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	253 (min: 128, max: 283) MBit/s ∼79% -21%
Huawei P30 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	218 (min: 95, max: 239) MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 703, n=456)	218 MBit/s ∼68% -32%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø351 (330-362)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (302-325)

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

Cliquer pour charger les images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro

Huawei P30 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

Cliquer pour charger les images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro

Huawei P30 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

Cliquer pour charger les images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro

Huawei P30 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

28.4 ∆E

52.1 ∆E

37.5 ∆E

35.4 ∆E

43 ∆E

60.3 ∆E

51.3 ∆E

32.6 ∆E

39 ∆E

26.7 ∆E

62.1 ∆E

62.6 ∆E

28 ∆E

46.3 ∆E

34.1 ∆E

73 ∆E

40.9 ∆E

42 ∆E

80.8 ∆E

68.2 ∆E

50.1 ∆E

36.1 ∆E

23.4 ∆E

13.2 ∆E

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro: 44.46 ∆E min: 13.2 - max: 80.77 ∆E

19.5 ∆E

9.3 ∆E

16.5 ∆E

17.8 ∆E

13.7 ∆E

8.7 ∆E

8.6 ∆E

17.2 ∆E

9 ∆E

6 ∆E

8.2 ∆E

6.8 ∆E

16.1 ∆E

15.9 ∆E

11.8 ∆E

2 ∆E

7.4 ∆E

10.6 ∆E

2.5 ∆E

7.3 ∆E

12.3 ∆E

9.4 ∆E

2.9 ∆E

2.4 ∆E

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro: 10.08 ∆E min: 1.99 - max: 19.52 ∆E


642 cd/m²	653 cd/m²	615 cd/m²
644 cd/m²	669 cd/m²	616 cd/m²
593 cd/m²	658 cd/m²	583 cd/m²

Homogénéité de la luminosité

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 669 cd/m² Moyenne: 630.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.25 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 87 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 669 cd/m²
Contraste: 1593:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
92.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.97	Sony Xperia 10 IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6	Huawei P30 Lite IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.15	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3	Samsung Galaxy A40 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.9
Screen		28%	-2%	5%	21%	-23%
Brightness middle	669	583 -13%	547 -18%	451 -33%	656 -2%	358 -46%
Brightness	630	577 -8%	525 -17%	430 -32%	643 2%	370 -41%
Brightness Distribution	87	97 11%	93 7%	90 3%	95 9%	94 8%
Black Level *	0.42		0.36 14%	0.55 -31%	0.54 -29%
Contrast	1593		1519 -5%	820 -49%	1215 -24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	4.8	1.6 67%	4.6 4%	1.4 71%	1.1 77%	7.4 -54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	9	3.9 57%	12.1 -34%	4.4 51%	2.4 73%	12.5 -39%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	6.2	2.7 56%	3.9 37%	2.5 60%	2.2 65%	4 35%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.27 ^97%	2.17 ^101%	2.22 ^99%	2.2 ^100%	2.084 ^106%
CCT	7846 ^83%	6267 ^104%	7158 ^91%	6422 ^101%	6263 ^104%	7078 ^92%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9364 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.

↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc
20 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 6.8 ms hausse
20 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 13.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
38.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 18.8 ms hausse
38.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 19.6 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (39.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1218 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	422 Points ∼27% -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	422 Points ∼27% -65%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	1218 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (183 - 3222, n=28)	1548 Points ∼100% +27%
OpenCL Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1793 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	363 Points ∼18% -80%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	1793 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (183 - 4593, n=34)	2039 Points ∼100% +14%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1612 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1327 Points ∼67% -18%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	1612 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (807 - 3575, n=45)	1989 Points ∼100% +23%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	391 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	314 Points ∼55% -20%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	391 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (155 - 1344, n=45)	576 Points ∼100% +47%

Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	5702 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	7282 Points ∼93% +28%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3763 Points ∼48% -34%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3551 Points ∼46% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	5122 Points ∼66% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	3722 Points ∼48% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	7795 Points ∼100% +37%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	5702 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=326)	4680 Points ∼60% -18%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	7624 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5975 Points ∼78% -22%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3986 Points ∼52% -48%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5429 Points ∼71% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	5366 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4105 Points ∼54% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6871 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	7624 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=385)	4718 Points ∼62% -38%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2484 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1875 Points ∼74% -25%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	837 Points ∼33% -66%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1544 Points ∼61% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1495 Points ∼59% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1329 Points ∼53% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2527 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	2484 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4824, n=385)	1424 Points ∼56% -43%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	9967 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	6832 Points ∼69% -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	5987 Points ∼60% -40%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6483 Points ∼65% -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	6498 Points ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5293 Points ∼53% -47%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	7533 Points ∼76% -24%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	9967 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 11690, n=396)	5356 Points ∼54% -46%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	14946 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	8346 Points ∼56% -44%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4948 Points ∼33% -67%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	8125 Points ∼54% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	7446 Points ∼50% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	6923 Points ∼46% -54%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	9049 Points ∼61% -39%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	14946 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 15193, n=563)	5817 Points ∼39% -61%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2543 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2338 Points ∼84% -8%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	2167 Points ∼78% -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2250 Points ∼81% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2061 Points ∼74% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2786 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	2543 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1740 - 15735, n=73)	2674 Points ∼96% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1978 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1907 Points ∼69% -4%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	693 Points ∼25% -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	898 Points ∼33% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	604 Points ∼22% -69%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1917 Points ∼70% -3%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	1978 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (203 - 14536, n=73)	2752 Points ∼100% +39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2087 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1988 Points ∼79% -5%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	861 Points ∼34% -59%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1036 Points ∼41% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	717 Points ∼29% -66%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2060 Points ∼82% -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	2087 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (253 - 14786, n=73)	2504 Points ∼100% +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3326 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2506 Points ∼75% -25%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1664 Points ∼50% -50%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2550 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2298 Points ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1691 Points ∼51% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3241 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	3326 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 4737, n=403)	1988 Points ∼60% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2322 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2146 Points ∼92% -8%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	792 Points ∼34% -66%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	843 Points ∼36% -64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	980 Points ∼42% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	549 Points ∼24% -76%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2176 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	2322 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 8374, n=403)	1803 Points ∼78% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2412 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2217 Points ∼92% -8%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	896 Points ∼37% -63%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	981 Points ∼41% -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1134 Points ∼47% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	646 Points ∼27% -73%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2347 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	2412 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 6916, n=404)	1673 Points ∼69% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3362 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2506 Points ∼75% -25%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1732 Points ∼52% -48%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2578 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2348 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1710 Points ∼51% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3296 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	3362 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4725, n=432)	1898 Points ∼56% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2323 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2146 Points ∼65% -8%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1299 Points ∼39% -44%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1336 Points ∼40% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1668 Points ∼50% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	823 Points ∼25% -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3316 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	2323 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 20154, n=432)	2406 Points ∼73% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2412 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2217 Points ∼67% -8%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1375 Points ∼42% -43%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1494 Points ∼45% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1778 Points ∼54% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	930 Points ∼28% -61%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3312 Points ∼100% +37%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	2412 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (88 - 10427, n=432)	2018 Points ∼61% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3280 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2480 Points ∼76% -24%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1645 Points ∼50% -50%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2489 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2408 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1675 Points ∼51% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3227 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	3280 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (486 - 4519, n=483)	1896 Points ∼58% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2218 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1980 Points ∼89% -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	704 Points ∼32% -68%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	819 Points ∼37% -63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	967 Points ∼44% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	539 Points ∼24% -76%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2008 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	2218 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 7150, n=483)	1493 Points ∼67% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2390 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2073 Points ∼87% -13%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	809 Points ∼34% -66%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	963 Points ∼40% -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1114 Points ∼47% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	635 Points ∼27% -73%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2192 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	2390 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 6319, n=484)	1436 Points ∼60% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3267 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2480 Points ∼76% -24%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1687 Points ∼52% -48%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2490 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2378 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1687 Points ∼52% -48%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3239 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	3267 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 4540, n=524)	1759 Points ∼54% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2219 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1980 Points ∼62% -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1235 Points ∼39% -44%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1256 Points ∼39% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1607 Points ∼50% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	702 Points ∼22% -68%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3184 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	2219 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 11302, n=523)	1959 Points ∼62% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2390 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2073 Points ∼65% -13%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1315 Points ∼41% -45%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1414 Points ∼44% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1728 Points ∼54% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	807 Points ∼25% -66%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3196 Points ∼100% +34%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	2390 Points ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8338, n=526)	1689 Points ∼53% -29%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	22928 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	13686 Points ∼60% -40%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	12437 Points ∼54% -46%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	12023 Points ∼52% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	20354 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	12321 Points ∼54% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	19433 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	22928 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 45072, n=684)	14281 Points ∼62% -38%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	39137 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	43514 Points ∼93% +11%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	17878 Points ∼38% -54%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	21643 Points ∼46% -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	24654 Points ∼53% -37%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	13821 Points ∼30% -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	46605 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	39137 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 209204, n=682)	22374 Points ∼48% -43%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	33832 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	29316 Points ∼82% -13%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	16290 Points ∼46% -52%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	18377 Points ∼52% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	23534 Points ∼66% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	13457 Points ∼38% -60%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	35557 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	33832 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 97276, n=682)	18053 Points ∼51% -47%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	82 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	74 fps ∼90% -10%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	29 fps ∼35% -65%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	33 fps ∼40% -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	36 fps ∼44% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	25 fps ∼30% -70%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	77 fps ∼94% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	82 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=700)	38.3 fps ∼47% -53%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	58 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	58 fps ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	25 fps ∼43% -57%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	31 fps ∼53% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	33 fps ∼57% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	23 fps ∼40% -60%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	58 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	58 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 120, n=709)	28.2 fps ∼49% -51%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	49 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	36 fps ∼73% -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	13 fps ∼27% -73%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	17 fps ∼35% -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	19 fps ∼39% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	13 fps ∼27% -73%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	38 fps ∼78% -22%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	49 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 175, n=606)	22 fps ∼45% -55%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	42 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	33 fps ∼79% -21%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	11 fps ∼26% -74%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	16 fps ∼38% -62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	17 fps ∼40% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	12 fps ∼29% -71%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	34 fps ∼81% -19%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	42 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 115, n=615)	19.5 fps ∼46% -54%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	29 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	26 fps ∼90% -10%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	9.5 fps ∼33% -67%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	12 fps ∼41% -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	13 fps ∼45% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	8.1 fps ∼28% -72%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	27 fps ∼93% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	29 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=471)	18 fps ∼62% -38%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	26 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	24 fps ∼92% -8%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	7.8 fps ∼30% -70%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	11 fps ∼42% -58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	12 fps ∼46% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	7.4 fps ∼28% -72%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	24 fps ∼92% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	26 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=473)	16.8 fps ∼65% -35%

GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	6.8 fps ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	9.1 fps ∼90% +34%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	2.7 fps ∼27% -60%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	4.2 fps ∼42% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2.8 fps ∼28% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2.9 fps ∼29% -57%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	9.3 fps ∼92% +37%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	6.8 fps ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 60, n=194)	10.1 fps ∼100% +49%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	11 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5.8 fps ∼53% -47%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1.7 fps ∼15% -85%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2.6 fps ∼24% -76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	4.4 fps ∼40% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1.8 fps ∼16% -84%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6.1 fps ∼55% -45%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	11 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 33, n=193)	7.01 fps ∼64% -36%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	17 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	14 fps ∼82% -18%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.4 fps ∼26% -74%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.4 fps ∼38% -62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	7.2 fps ∼42% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4.2 fps ∼25% -75%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	15 fps ∼88% -12%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	17 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 60, n=198)	14.8 fps ∼87% -13%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	19 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	16 fps ∼84% -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.9 fps ∼26% -74%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7 fps ∼37% -63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	8.1 fps ∼43% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4.7 fps ∼25% -75%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps ∼84% -16%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	19 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 87, n=198)	16.6 fps ∼87% -13%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	16 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	15 fps ∼94% -6%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	5.3 fps ∼33% -67%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.9 fps ∼43% -57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	6.9 fps ∼43% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5.2 fps ∼33% -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	16 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 73, n=396)	12.3 fps ∼77% -23%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	14 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	13 fps ∼93% -7%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.3 fps ∼31% -69%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.5 fps ∼46% -54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	6.1 fps ∼44% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4.6 fps ∼33% -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	13 fps ∼93% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	14 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=400)	11 fps ∼79% -21%

Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	18.1 (min: 2.3, max: 44.7) fps ∼21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	0 fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	14.23 (min: 8.05, max: 26.52) fps ∼16% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	8.24 (min: 5.77, max: 20.65) fps ∼10% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	6.21 fps ∼7% -66%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16.91 fps ∼20% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (18.1 - 18.1, n=2)	9.05 fps ∼10% -50%
Average of class Smartphone (8.24 - 4528, n=65)	86.3 fps ∼100% +377%
Vulkan Medium Native (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	21.2 (min: 4.9, max: 40.7) fps ∼33%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	12.76 (min: 7.68, max: 27.7) fps ∼20% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	6.65 (min: 3.4, max: 18.65) fps ∼10% -69%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	6.43 fps ∼10% -70%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	13.56 fps ∼21% -36%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	21.2 fps ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.57 - 2850, n=57)	63.9 fps ∼100% +201%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	19.4 (min: 3.7, max: 33.6) fps ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	14.18 (min: 8.4, max: 36.6) fps ∼14% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	7.44 (min: 3.6, max: 21.99) fps ∼8% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5.35 fps ∼5% -72%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	15.51 fps ∼16% -20%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	19.4 fps ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.88 - 4462, n=55)	98.5 fps ∼100% +408%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	179353 Points ∼85%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	88287 Points ∼42%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	132834 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	103205 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	210836 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 462516, n=296)	143005 Points ∼68%

VRMark - Amber Room (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3243 Score ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1966 Score ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1134 Score ∼35% -65%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	927 Score ∼29% -71%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2000 Score ∼62% -38%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	3243 Score ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 5025, n=62)	2227 Score ∼69% -31%

BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1145 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1172 Points ∼100% +2%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	815 Points ∼70% -29%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1024 Points ∼87% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	937 Points ∼80% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	974 Points ∼83% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1099 Points ∼94% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	1145 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1745, n=640)	763 Points ∼65% -33%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3419 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	3453 Points ∼97% +1%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1409 Points ∼40% -59%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1478 Points ∼42% -57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1881 Points ∼53% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1114 Points ∼31% -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3559 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	3419 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 16996, n=640)	2094 Points ∼59% -39%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3609 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2969 Points ∼64% -18%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	983 Points ∼21% -73%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3036 Points ∼65% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2808 Points ∼60% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1935 Points ∼42% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	4646 Points ∼100% +29%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	3609 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 7500, n=640)	1546 Points ∼33% -57%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	6155 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5932 Points ∼88% -4%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3159 Points ∼47% -49%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5146 Points ∼76% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	5006 Points ∼74% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	3788 Points ∼56% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6760 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	6155 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 14189, n=640)	3022 Points ∼45% -51%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3054 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2906 Points ∼87% -5%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1374 Points ∼41% -55%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2201 Points ∼66% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2254 Points ∼68% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1679 Points ∼50% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3329 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	3054 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6097, n=640)	1515 Points ∼46% -50%

AnTuTu v8
UX (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	45630 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	27535 Points ∼60% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	27535 Points ∼60% -40%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	45630 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7553 - 78191, n=14)	36536 Points ∼80% -20%
MEM (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	59227 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	38271 Points ∼65% -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	38271 Points ∼65% -35%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	59227 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (24176 - 92659, n=14)	45871 Points ∼77% -23%
GPU (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	79602 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	33000 Points ∼41% -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	33000 Points ∼41% -59%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	79602 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5938 - 199051, n=14)	74515 Points ∼94% -6%
CPU (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	97626 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	70889 Points ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	70889 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	97626 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (40810 - 145684, n=14)	84660 Points ∼87% -13%
Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	282085 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	169695 Points ∼60% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	169695 Points ∼60% -40%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	282085 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (95354 - 501784, n=14)	241583 Points ∼86% -14%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	37.214 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=112)	36.1 Points ∼97% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	35.3 Points ∼95% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	35.298 Points ∼95%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	31.781 Points ∼85% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	30.65 Points ∼82% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)	22.65 Points ∼61% -36%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	16.254 Points ∼44% -54%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	72.1 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	72.098 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	55.132 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	50.33 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)	42.7 Points ∼59% -41%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=537)	42.2 Points ∼59% -41%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	41.6 runs/min ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	41.6 runs/min ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=100)	39.8 runs/min ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	37.5 runs/min ∼90% -10%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	31.7 runs/min ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	30.8 runs/min ∼74% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)	24.1 runs/min ∼58% -42%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	72 Points ∼100% +31%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=170)	67.1 Points ∼93% +22%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	66 Points ∼92% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	55 Points ∼76%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	55 Points ∼76% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)	52 Points ∼72% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	52 Points ∼72% -5%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	39 Points ∼54% -29%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	15606 Points ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	15606 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	13562 Points ∼87% -13%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	9779 Points ∼63% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	9405 Points ∼60% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)	7798 Points ∼50% -50%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=698)	6865 Points ∼44% -56%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	4865 Points ∼31% -69%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=723)	10475 ms * ∼100% -249%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	10256.9 ms * ∼98% -242%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)	4975.8 ms * ∼48% -66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	4561.76 ms * ∼44% -52%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	4137.8 ms * ∼40% -38%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	3002 ms * ∼29% -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	3001.5 ms * ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	2911.8 ms * ∼28% +3%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	208 Points ∼100% +44%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 74)	155 Points ∼75% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8	145 Points ∼70% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro	144 Points ∼69%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T	144 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=333)	122 Points ∼59% -15%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE	Sony Xperia 10	Huawei P30 Lite	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8	Samsung Galaxy A40	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-31%	-27%	-24%	-27%	-35%	-1%	-45%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	57.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		63.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 11%	67.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 18%	52.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -8%	65.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 14%	59.4 (25.5 - 72.4, n=22) 4%	49.4 (1.7 - 87.1, n=434) -14%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	71.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		83.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 16%	76.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 7%	71.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	81.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 13%	74.5 (28.2 - 88.2, n=22) 4%	67.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=434) -5%
Random Write 4KB	180.4	21.86 -88%	14.39 -92%	87.29 -52%	91.23 -49%	13.2 -93%	88.5 (18.2 - 250, n=44) -51%	22.7 (0.14 - 250, n=758) -87%
Random Read 4KB	156.22	115.83 -26%	53.12 -66%	71.57 -54%	84.76 -46%	75.7 -52%	139 (98.9 - 161, n=44) -11%	48.1 (1.59 - 196, n=758) -69%
Sequential Write 256KB	193.54	190.1 -2%	232.87 20%	158.63 -18%	160.53 -17%	99.6 -49%	213 (182 - 503, n=44) 10%	98.6 (2.99 - 590, n=758) -49%
Sequential Read 256KB	534.5	492.48 -8%	273.8 -49%	293.23 -45%	297.65 -44%	295 -45%	740 (422 - 912, n=44) 38%	277 (12.1 - 1504, n=758) -48%

PUBG Mobile

: Ø39.7 (34-42)

Asphalt 9 Legends

; High Quality: Ø29.7 (20-31)

; Standard / low: Ø29.9 (27-31)

Dead Trigger 2

: Ø60 (59-61)

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge


36.1 °C	36.1 °C	36.9 °C
34.8 °C	35.5 °C	37.1 °C
34.1 °C	35.5 °C	36.9 °C

Maximum: 37.1 °C
Moyenne: 35.9 °C


31.8 °C	34.7 °C	36.6 °C
32 °C	33.9 °C	36.6 °C
32.9 °C	34.5 °C	34.9 °C

Maximum: 36.6 °C
Moyenne: 34.2 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 26.2 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique

Éteint/en veille	0.01 / 0.25 Watts
Au repos	0.79 / 2.32 / 2.38 Watts
Fortement sollicité	4.72 / 7.68 Watts


Légende: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 4500 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 3070 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 2870 mAh	Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A40 3100 mAh	Average Mediatek Helio G90T	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		41%	17%	-3%	24%	-5%	0%	13%
Idle Minimum *	0.79	0.53 33%	0.72 9%	0.91 -15%	0.62 22%	0.8 -1%	0.79 -0%	0.883 (0.2 - 3.4, n=787) -12%
Idle Average *	2.32	1.18 49%	2.16 7%	2.41 -4%	1.77 24%	1.4 40%	2.32 -0%	1.74 (0.6 - 6.2, n=786) 25%
Idle Maximum *	2.38	1.2 50%	2.17 9%	2.43 -2%	1.8 24%	2.3 3%	2.38 -0%	2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=787) 15%
Load Average *	4.72	3.04 36%	3.32 30%	4.57 3%	3.42 28%	7.4 -57%	4.72 -0%	4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=781) 14%
Load Maximum *	7.68	4.83 37%	5.34 30%	7.57 1%	6.14 20%	8.6 -12%	7.68 -0%	5.93 (1.2 - 14.2, n=781) 23%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie

Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)		31h 33min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		14h 24min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p		16h 24min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)		3h 32min

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 4500 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 3070 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 2870 mAh	Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A40 3100 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie		-20%	-28%	-28%	-1%	-6%
Reader / Idle	1893	1374 -27%	1006 -47%	1248 -34%	2139 13%	1689 -11%
H.264	984	853 -13%	620 -37%	685 -30%	859 -13%	825 -16%
WiFi v1.3	864	510 -41%	541 -37%	515 -40%	824 -5%	643 -26%
Load	212	218 3%	233 10%	198 -7%	217 2%	277 31%

Points positifs

+ allure et prise en main

+ 6 Go de RAM

+ Wifi rapide

+ autonomie

+ NFC

+ Bluetooth 5.0

+ stockage UFS 128 Go

+ performances du SoC Helio...

Points négatifs

- ...mais la puce graphique non adaptée au jeu

- chauffe

- haut-parleur

- (version chinoise : pas de bande LTE 20 ni de Widevine L3)

Verdict

En test : le Redmi Note 8 Pro. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par TradingShenzhen.

Le dernier porte-étendard du milieu de gamme de Redmi fait bonne impression dans nos tests, et au vu de son prix contenu d’environ 220 € pour la version internationale, ne mérite pas vraiment de critiques. Cela dit, la chauffe et le throttling du SoC, ains que le haut-parleur mono médiocre et l’emplacement du capteur d’empreintes digitales doivent être pris en compte.

Alors que le Redmi Note 8 Pro ne devrait pas être le premier choix pour les joueurs, il est l’un des meilleurs smartphones du milieu de gamme actuellement disponibles.

Même si le Note 8 équipé d’un processeur Snapdragon peut sembler être un meilleur choix sur le papier, la version Pro avec le SoC MediaTek est capable d’obtenir de très bon résultats au quotidien, utilisation pour laquelle les performances sont adéquates, le processeur s’avérant aussi bon que les puces Qualcomm de série 700.

À la différence du Note 8, le modèle Pro du Redmi brille avec un bon appareil photo. Le Samsung GW1 prend des photos très détaillées de jour, du niveau du capteur Sony IMX 582.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro - 2019-11-1811/18/2019 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Châssis

87%

Clavier

67 / 75 → 90%

Dispositif de pointage

92%

Connectivité

50 / 70 → 71%

Poids

88%

Autonomie

90%

Écran

84%

Performances en jeu

26 / 64 →