Notebookcheck

Test du Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro : SoC orienté jeu et appareil photo 64 MP

Smartphone du milieu de gamme pour joueurs ? Sur le papier, le Redmi Note 8 Pro possède tout ce dont il a besoin pour être le nouveau chef de file des smartphones du milieu de gamme. Mais le nouveau MediaTek Helio G90T tient-il ses promesses ? Vous aurez la réponse en lisant ce rapport de test.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Felivitas Krohn (traduit par Prévots),
Android Touchscreen Smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Redmi Note Gamme)
Processeur
Mediatek Helio G90T 8 x 2.1 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Carte graphique
ARM Mali-G76 MP4
Mémoire
6144 Mo 
Écran
6.53 pouces 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 395 PPP, capacitif, Prise en charge native d'une utilisation avec un stylet, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, brillant: oui
Disque dur
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 Go 
, 109.6 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrarouge, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD (256 Go), 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: boussole, accéléromètre, gyroscope, capteur de proximité, USB C, OTG, Miracast, LED de notification
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850 / ​900 / ​1 800 / ​1 900), 3G (B1 / ​B2 / ​B4 / ​B5 / ​B8), 4G (B1 / ​B2 / ​B3 / ​B4 / ​B5 / ​B7 / ​B8 / ​B20 / ​B28 / ​B38 / ​B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.79 x 161.35 x 76.4
Batterie
4500 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 64 MPix Quad : 64 MP (f/1,9, 26mm, 1 / 1,7", 0,8 µm) + 8 MP (f/2,2, 13mm, 1 / 4", 1,12µm) + 2 MP (f/2,4, 1 / 5", 1,75µm) + 2 MP (f/2,4, 1 / 5", 1,75µm), appareil photo2 API : Full
Appareil photo secondaire: 20 MPix f/2,0, 0,9 µm
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, câble USB, adaptateur secteur modulaire, coque en silicone, MiUI, 12 Mois Garantie, DAS : 0,997 W/​kg tête, 1,466 W/​kg corps, DRM Widevine : L1 (EU) L3 (Chine), fanless
Poids
200 g, Alimentation: 61 g
Prix
250 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Appareils du comparatif

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Drive
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
81 %
11/19
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4		200 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.53"2340x1080
88 %
05/19
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
SD 712, Adreno 616		155 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash5.97"2340x1080
84 %
04/19
Sony Xperia 10
SD 630, Adreno 508		162 g64 GB eMMC Flash6"2520x1080
78 %
05/19
Huawei P30 Lite
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4		159 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.15"2312x1080
79 %
11/19
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
SD 665, Adreno 610		190 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
79 %
05/19
Samsung Galaxy A40
Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2		140 g64 GB eMMC Flash5.9"2340x1080
80 %
05/19
Samsung Galaxy A50
Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3		166 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2340x1080
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro

Top 10
» Le Top 10 des PC portables multimédia 
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu légers
» Le Top 10 des ordinateurs portables bureautiques
» Le Top 10 des PC portables bureautiques premium/professionnels 
» Le Top 10 des Stations de travail mobiles
» Le Top 10 des Ultraportables
» Le Top 10 des Ultrabooks
» Le Top 10 des Convertibles
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes Windows
» Le Top 10 des Smartphones
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 300 euros
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 500 euros
» Le Top 25 des meilleurs écrans d'ordinateurs

Comparaison des tailles

❌
161.35 mm 76.4 mm 8.79 mm 200 g158.3 mm 75.3 mm 8.3 mm 190 g156 mm 68 mm 8.4 mm 162 g152.9 mm 72.7 mm 7.4 mm 159 g147.5 mm 70.5 mm 7.45 mm 155 g144.4 mm 69.2 mm 7.9 mm 140 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
353 (330min - 362max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
339 (320min - 349max) MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 (326min - 341max) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
311 (214min - 346max) MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=584)
274 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash
222 (203min - 243max) MBit/s ∼63% -37%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
188 (45min - 237max) MBit/s ∼53% -47%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
319 (302min - 325max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
303 (242min - 355max) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
279 (229min - 303max) MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash
268 (244min - 288max) MBit/s ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=584)
261 MBit/s ∼82% -18%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
253 (128min - 283max) MBit/s ∼79% -21%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
218 (95min - 239max) MBit/s ∼68% -32%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø351 (330-362)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (302-325)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
GPS Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
GPS Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
GPS Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
GPS Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
GPS Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker
28.4 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
43 ∆E
60.3 ∆E
51.3 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
39 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
62.1 ∆E
62.6 ∆E
28 ∆E
46.3 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
73 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
42 ∆E
80.8 ∆E
68.2 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro: 44.46 ∆E min: 13.2 - max: 80.77 ∆E
ColorChecker
19.5 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
9 ∆E
6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro: 10.08 ∆E min: 1.99 - max: 19.52 ∆E
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mire de test.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
642
cd/m²		653
cd/m²		615
cd/m²
644
cd/m²		669
cd/m²		616
cd/m²
593
cd/m²		658
cd/m²		583
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 669 cd/m² Moyenne: 630.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.25 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 87 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 669 cd/m²
Contraste: 1593:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6
92.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53		Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.97		Sony Xperia 10
IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6		Huawei P30 Lite
IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.15		Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3		Samsung Galaxy A40
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.9
Screen
28%
-2%
5%
21%
-23%
Brightness middle
669
583
-13%
547
-18%
451
-33%
656
-2%
358
-46%
Brightness
630
577
-8%
525
-17%
430
-32%
643
2%
370
-41%
Brightness Distribution
87
97
11%
93
7%
90
3%
95
9%
94
8%
Black Level *
0.42
0.36
14%
0.55
-31%
0.54
-29%
Contrast
1593
1519
-5%
820
-49%
1215
-24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.8
1.6
67%
4.6
4%
1.4
71%
1.1
77%
7.4
-54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9
3.9
57%
12.1
-34%
4.4
51%
2.4
73%
12.5
-39%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.2
2.7
56%
3.9
37%
2.5
60%
2.2
65%
4
35%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.27 97%
2.17 101%
2.22 99%
2.2 100%
2.084 106%
CCT
7846 83%
6267 104%
7158 91%
6422 101%
6263 104%
7078 92%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ
Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 17714 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ
Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
   ↔    Temps de réponse noir à blanc
20 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 6.8 ms hausse
↘ 13.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
   ↔    Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
38.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 18.8 ms hausse
↘ 19.6 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (38.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5 | Geekbench 4.4 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | Basemark GPU 1.1 | AnTuTu v7 | VRMark | BaseMark OS II | AnTuTu v8
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1218 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
422 Points ∼31% -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
422 Points ∼31% -65%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
 
1218 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (143 - 3794, n=45)
1362 Points ∼100% +12%
OpenCL Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1793 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
363 Points ∼20% -80%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
 
1793 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=53)
1738 Points ∼97% -3%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1612 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1327 Points ∼73% -18%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
 
1612 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=65)
1821 Points ∼100% +13%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
391 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
314 Points ∼61% -20%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
 
391 Points ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=65)
519 Points ∼100% +33%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
5702 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
7282 Points ∼93% +28%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3763 Points ∼48% -34%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3551 Points ∼46% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
5122 Points ∼66% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3722 Points ∼48% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7795 Points ∼100% +37%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (5702 - 5862, n=2)
5782 Points ∼74% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=353)
4871 Points ∼62% -15%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
7624 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5975 Points ∼77% -22%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3986 Points ∼52% -48%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5429 Points ∼70% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
5366 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4105 Points ∼53% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6871 Points ∼89% -10%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (7624 - 7795, n=2)
7710 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13589, n=416)
4994 Points ∼65% -34%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2484 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1875 Points ∼74% -25%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
837 Points ∼33% -66%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1544 Points ∼61% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1495 Points ∼59% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1329 Points ∼52% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2527 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2484 - 2594, n=2)
2539 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4965, n=416)
1525 Points ∼60% -39%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
9967 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
6832 Points ∼67% -31%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5987 Points ∼58% -40%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6483 Points ∼63% -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6498 Points ∼63% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5293 Points ∼52% -47%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7533 Points ∼74% -24%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (9967 - 10512, n=2)
10240 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=509)
5915 Points ∼58% -41%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
14946 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
8346 Points ∼56% -44%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4948 Points ∼33% -67%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8125 Points ∼54% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
7446 Points ∼50% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
6923 Points ∼46% -54%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9049 Points ∼61% -39%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (14669 - 14946, n=2)
14808 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=667)
6485 Points ∼43% -57%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2543 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2338 Points ∼84% -8%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2167 Points ∼78% -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2250 Points ∼81% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2061 Points ∼74% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2786 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2333 - 2543, n=2)
2438 Points ∼88% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=163)
2656 Points ∼95% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1978 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1907 Points ∼64% -4%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
693 Points ∼23% -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
898 Points ∼30% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
604 Points ∼20% -69%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1917 Points ∼64% -3%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (1978 - 2524, n=2)
2251 Points ∼76% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=163)
2978 Points ∼100% +51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2087 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1988 Points ∼74% -5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
861 Points ∼32% -59%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1036 Points ∼39% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
717 Points ∼27% -66%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2060 Points ∼77% -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2087 - 2479, n=2)
2283 Points ∼85% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6754, n=163)
2673 Points ∼100% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3326 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼75% -25%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1664 Points ∼50% -50%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2550 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2298 Points ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1691 Points ∼51% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3241 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (3188 - 3326, n=2)
3257 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=512)
2200 Points ∼66% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2322 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼90% -8%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
792 Points ∼33% -66%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
843 Points ∼35% -64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
980 Points ∼41% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
549 Points ∼23% -76%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2176 Points ∼92% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2322 - 2433, n=2)
2378 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=512)
2112 Points ∼89% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2412 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼89% -8%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
896 Points ∼36% -63%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
981 Points ∼39% -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1134 Points ∼46% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
646 Points ∼26% -73%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2347 Points ∼94% -3%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2412 - 2568, n=2)
2490 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8269, n=513)
1971 Points ∼79% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3362 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼75% -25%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1732 Points ∼52% -48%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2578 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2348 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1710 Points ∼51% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3296 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (3143 - 3362, n=2)
3253 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=543)
2112 Points ∼63% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2323 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼65% -8%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1299 Points ∼39% -44%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1336 Points ∼40% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1668 Points ∼50% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
823 Points ∼25% -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3316 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2323 - 2965, n=2)
2644 Points ∼80% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=543)
2830 Points ∼85% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2412 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼67% -8%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1375 Points ∼42% -43%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1494 Points ∼45% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1778 Points ∼54% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
930 Points ∼28% -61%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3312 Points ∼100% +37%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2412 - 3003, n=2)
2708 Points ∼82% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=543)
2376 Points ∼72% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3280 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼76% -24%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1645 Points ∼50% -50%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2489 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2408 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1675 Points ∼51% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3227 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (3114 - 3280, n=2)
3197 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=593)
2083 Points ∼64% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2218 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼86% -11%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
704 Points ∼31% -68%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
819 Points ∼36% -63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
967 Points ∼42% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
539 Points ∼23% -76%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2008 Points ∼87% -9%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2218 - 2384, n=2)
2301 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=593)
1779 Points ∼77% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2390 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼85% -13%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
809 Points ∼33% -66%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
963 Points ∼39% -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1114 Points ∼45% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
635 Points ∼26% -73%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2192 Points ∼89% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2390 - 2515, n=2)
2453 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7400, n=594)
1695 Points ∼69% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3267 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼76% -24%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1687 Points ∼52% -48%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2490 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2378 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1687 Points ∼52% -48%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3239 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (3194 - 3267, n=2)
3231 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=635)
1948 Points ∼60% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2219 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼62% -11%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1235 Points ∼39% -44%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1256 Points ∼39% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1607 Points ∼50% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
702 Points ∼22% -68%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3184 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2219 - 3108, n=2)
2664 Points ∼84% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12611, n=634)
2340 Points ∼73% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2390 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼65% -13%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1315 Points ∼41% -45%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1414 Points ∼44% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1728 Points ∼54% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
807 Points ∼25% -66%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3196 Points ∼100% +34%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2390 - 3127, n=2)
2759 Points ∼86% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9549, n=637)
2011 Points ∼63% -16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
22928 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13686 Points ∼60% -40%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
12437 Points ∼54% -46%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12023 Points ∼52% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
20354 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
12321 Points ∼54% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
19433 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (19084 - 22928, n=2)
21006 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=781)
15413 Points ∼67% -33%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
39137 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
43514 Points ∼93% +11%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
17878 Points ∼38% -54%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21643 Points ∼46% -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
24654 Points ∼53% -37%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13821 Points ∼30% -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
46605 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (36463 - 39137, n=2)
37800 Points ∼81% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=779)
26525 Points ∼57% -32%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
33832 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
29316 Points ∼82% -13%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
16290 Points ∼46% -52%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
18377 Points ∼52% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
23534 Points ∼66% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13457 Points ∼38% -60%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
35557 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (30326 - 33832, n=2)
32079 Points ∼90% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=779)
20738 Points ∼58% -39%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
82 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
74 fps ∼90% -10%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
29 fps ∼35% -65%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
33 fps ∼40% -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
36 fps ∼44% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
25 fps ∼30% -70%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
77 fps ∼94% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (78 - 82, n=2)
80 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=784)
44.9 fps ∼55% -45%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
58 fps ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
58 fps ∼99% 0%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
25 fps ∼43% -57%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
31 fps ∼53% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
33 fps ∼56% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
23 fps ∼39% -60%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
58 fps ∼99% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (58 - 59, n=2)
58.5 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=793)
31 fps ∼53% -47%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
49 fps ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
36 fps ∼73% -27%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
13 fps ∼26% -73%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
17 fps ∼34% -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
19 fps ∼38% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼26% -73%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼77% -22%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (49 - 50, n=2)
49.5 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=689)
26.5 fps ∼54% -46%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
42 fps ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
33 fps ∼76% -21%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
11 fps ∼25% -74%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
16 fps ∼37% -62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
17 fps ∼39% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
12 fps ∼28% -71%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼78% -19%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (42 - 45, n=2)
43.5 fps ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=697)
22.3 fps ∼51% -47%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
29 fps ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
26 fps ∼87% -10%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
9.5 fps ∼32% -67%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼40% -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps ∼43% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
8.1 fps ∼27% -72%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼90% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (29 - 31, n=2)
30 fps ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=552)
21.3 fps ∼71% -27%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
26 fps ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
24 fps ∼91% -8%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
7.8 fps ∼29% -70%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
11 fps ∼42% -58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
12 fps ∼45% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
7.4 fps ∼28% -72%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
24 fps ∼91% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (26 - 27, n=2)
26.5 fps ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=554)
19.4 fps ∼73% -25%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
6.8 fps ∼60%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
9.1 fps ∼81% +34%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2.7 fps ∼24% -60%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.2 fps ∼37% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
4.4 fps ∼39% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2.9 fps ∼26% -57%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9.3 fps ∼82% +37%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (6.8 - 11, n=2)
8.9 fps ∼79% +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=305)
11.3 fps ∼100% +66%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
11 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5.8 fps ∼53% -47%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1.7 fps ∼15% -85%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps ∼24% -76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2.8 fps ∼25% -75%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1.8 fps ∼16% -84%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6.1 fps ∼55% -45%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (6.9 - 11, n=2)
8.95 fps ∼81% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=303)
8.09 fps ∼74% -26%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
17 fps ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps ∼80% -18%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.4 fps ∼25% -74%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps ∼37% -62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
7.2 fps ∼41% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4.2 fps ∼24% -75%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼86% -12%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (17 - 18, n=2)
17.5 fps ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=309)
16.9 fps ∼97% -1%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19 fps ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
16 fps ∼82% -16%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.9 fps ∼25% -74%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼36% -63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
8.1 fps ∼42% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4.7 fps ∼24% -75%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼82% -16%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (19 - 20, n=2)
19.5 fps ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=308)
19.4 fps ∼99% +2%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
16 fps ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
15 fps ∼88% -6%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5.3 fps ∼31% -67%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.9 fps ∼41% -57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6.9 fps ∼41% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5.2 fps ∼31% -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼94% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (16 - 18, n=2)
17 fps ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=477)
14.3 fps ∼84% -11%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
14 fps ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps ∼87% -7%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.3 fps ∼29% -69%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.5 fps ∼43% -54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6.1 fps ∼41% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4.6 fps ∼31% -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13 fps ∼87% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (14 - 16, n=2)
15 fps ∼100% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=481)
12.7 fps ∼85% -9%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
18.1 (2.3min - 44.7max) fps ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
0 fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14.23 (8.05min - 26.52max) fps ∼74% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
8.24 (5.77min - 20.65max) fps ∼43% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
6.21 fps ∼32% -66%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16.91 fps ∼88% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (18.1 - 18.1, n=2)
9.05 fps ∼47% -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.73 - 85.6, n=73)
19.2 fps ∼100% +6%
Vulkan Medium Native (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
21.2 (4.9min - 40.7max) fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
12.76 (7.68min - 27.7max) fps ∼60% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6.65 (3.4min - 18.65max) fps ∼31% -69%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
6.43 fps ∼30% -70%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13.56 fps ∼64% -36%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
 
21.2 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=64)
16 fps ∼75% -25%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19.4 (3.7min - 33.6max) fps ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14.18 (8.4min - 36.6max) fps ∼71% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
7.44 (3.6min - 21.99max) fps ∼37% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5.35 fps ∼27% -72%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15.51 fps ∼78% -20%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
 
19.4 fps ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=62)
19.9 fps ∼100% +3%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
179353 Points ∼85%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
88287 Points ∼42%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
132834 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
103205 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
210836 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=297)
143610 Points ∼68%
VRMark - Amber Room (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3243 Score ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1966 Score ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1134 Score ∼35% -65%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
927 Score ∼29% -71%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2000 Score ∼62% -38%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (3243 - 3255, n=2)
3249 Score ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=87)
2558 Score ∼79% -21%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1145 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1172 Points ∼94% +2%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
815 Points ∼66% -29%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1024 Points ∼82% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
937 Points ∼75% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
974 Points ∼78% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1099 Points ∼88% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (1145 - 1339, n=2)
1242 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=723)
817 Points ∼66% -29%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3419 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3453 Points ∼97% +1%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1409 Points ∼40% -59%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1478 Points ∼42% -57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1881 Points ∼53% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1114 Points ∼31% -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3559 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (3419 - 3483, n=2)
3451 Points ∼97% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=723)
2489 Points ∼70% -27%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3609 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2969 Points ∼64% -18%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
983 Points ∼21% -73%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3036 Points ∼65% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2808 Points ∼60% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1935 Points ∼42% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
4646 Points ∼100% +29%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (3609 - 3676, n=2)
3643 Points ∼78% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=723)
1847 Points ∼40% -49%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
6155 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5932 Points ∼88% -4%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3159 Points ∼47% -49%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5146 Points ∼76% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
5006 Points ∼74% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3788 Points ∼56% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6760 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (5632 - 6155, n=2)
5894 Points ∼87% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=723)
3438 Points ∼51% -44%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3054 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2906 Points ∼87% -5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1374 Points ∼41% -55%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2201 Points ∼66% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2254 Points ∼68% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1679 Points ∼50% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3329 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (3054 - 3135, n=2)
3095 Points ∼93% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=723)
1752 Points ∼53% -43%
AnTuTu v8
UX (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
45630 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
27535 Points ∼50% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
27535 Points ∼50% -40%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (45630 - 56530, n=2)
51080 Points ∼93% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6969 - 110361, n=106)
54808 Points ∼100% +20%
MEM (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
59227 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
38271 Points ∼65% -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
38271 Points ∼65% -35%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (56316 - 59227, n=2)
57772 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9394 - 122714, n=105)
56043 Points ∼95% -5%
GPU (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
79602 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
33000 Points ∼32% -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
33000 Points ∼32% -59%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (79602 - 92690, n=2)
86146 Points ∼84% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4095 - 224320, n=105)
102207 Points ∼100% +28%
CPU (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
97626 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
70889 Points ∼67% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
70889 Points ∼67% -27%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (95868 - 97626, n=2)
96747 Points ∼92% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23816 - 185108, n=105)
105193 Points ∼100% +8%
Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
282085 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
169695 Points ∼53% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
169695 Points ∼53% -40%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (282085 - 301404, n=2)
291745 Points ∼92% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=105)
318822 Points ∼100% +13%
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=183)
40.6 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (35.3 - 41.7, n=2)
38.5 Points ∼95% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.214 Points ∼92% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
35.298 Points ∼87%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
31.781 Points ∼78% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
30.65 Points ∼75% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)
22.65 Points ∼56% -36%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
16.254 Points ∼40% -54%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
72.098 Points ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (70.5 - 72.1, n=2)
71.3 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
55.132 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
50.33 Points ∼70% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=614)
47 Points ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)
42.7 Points ∼59% -41%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=166)
43 runs/min ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
41.6 runs/min ∼97%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (34.4 - 41.6, n=2)
38 runs/min ∼88% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.5 runs/min ∼87% -10%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
31.7 runs/min ∼74% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
30.8 runs/min ∼72% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)
24.1 runs/min ∼56% -42%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
72 Points ∼100% +31%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=250)
69.9 Points ∼97% +27%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
66 Points ∼92% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
55 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)
52 Points ∼72% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
52 Points ∼72% -5%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (46 - 55, n=2)
50.5 Points ∼70% -8%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
39 Points ∼54% -29%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
15606 Points ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (15061 - 15606, n=2)
15334 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
13562 Points ∼87% -13%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
9779 Points ∼63% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
9405 Points ∼60% -40%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=781)
7826 Points ∼50% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)
7798 Points ∼50% -50%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
4865 Points ∼31% -69%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
10256.9 ms * ∼100% -242%
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=807)
9792 ms * ∼95% -226%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)
4975.8 ms * ∼49% -66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
4561.76 ms * ∼44% -52%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
4137.8 ms * ∼40% -38%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (3002 - 3316, n=2)
3159 ms * ∼31% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
3001.5 ms * ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
2911.8 ms * ∼28% +3%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
208 Points ∼100% +44%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 74)
155 Points ∼75% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
145 Points ∼70% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
144 Points ∼69%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (116 - 144, n=2)
130 Points ∼63% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (165 - 362, n=347)
124 Points ∼60% -14%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 ProXiaomi Mi 9 SESony Xperia 10Huawei P30 LiteXiaomi Redmi Note 8Samsung Galaxy A40Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-31%
-27%
-24%
-27%
-35%
-15%
-38%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
57.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
67.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18%
52.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
65.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
14%
54 (28.6 - 70.2, n=15)
-6%
51 (1.7 - 87.1, n=527)
-11%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
71.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
16%
76.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
71.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
81.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
69.7 (30.2 - 86, n=15)
-3%
69 (8.1 - 96.5, n=527)
-4%
Random Write 4KB
180.4
21.86
-88%
14.39
-92%
87.29
-52%
91.23
-49%
13.2
-93%
81.5 (13.5 - 187, n=21)
-55%
35.3 (0.14 - 319, n=878)
-80%
Random Read 4KB
156.22
115.83
-26%
53.12
-66%
71.57
-54%
84.76
-46%
75.7
-52%
124 (88.4 - 173, n=21)
-21%
58.7 (1.59 - 324, n=878)
-62%
Sequential Write 256KB
193.54
190.1
-2%
232.87
20%
158.63
-18%
160.53
-17%
99.6
-49%
195 (143 - 257, n=21)
1%
126 (2.99 - 911, n=878)
-35%
Sequential Read 256KB
534.5
492.48
-8%
273.8
-49%
293.23
-45%
297.65
-44%
295
-45%
495 (409 - 733, n=21)
-7%
338 (12.1 - 1802, n=878)
-37%
PUBG Mobile
01020304050Tooltip
: Ø39.7 (34-42)
Asphalt 9 Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø29.7 (20-31)
; Standard / low: Ø29.9 (27-31)
Dead Trigger 2
010203040506070Tooltip
: Ø60 (59-61)
A pleine charge
 36.1 °C36.1 °C36.9 °C 
 34.8 °C35.5 °C37.1 °C 
 34.1 °C35.5 °C36.9 °C 
Maximum: 37.1 °C
Moyenne: 35.9 °C
31.8 °C34.7 °C36.6 °C
32 °C33.9 °C36.6 °C
32.9 °C34.5 °C34.9 °C
Maximum: 36.6 °C
Moyenne: 34.2 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  26.2 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.933.92529.124.13125.424.34029.426.25039.4346327.324.88021.622.1100242312520.722.516019.938.52001840.925016.847.531516.253.340015.957.650013.559.263013.962.380012.964.910001465.4125014.766.6160014.168.2200014.268.7250014.569.8315015.470.6400014.970500014.867.563001562.8800015.360.81000015.360.51250015.6441600015.535.1SPL2779.3N0.942.8median 15.3median 60.8Delta1.311.534.927.529.130.525.431.929.427.539.432.827.327.721.622.82421.820.724.519.941.51847.716.854.516.26115.963.913.568.513.970.812.972.11472.414.774.614.175.314.275.314.575.115.474.214.978.914.878.41575.415.377.815.378.815.67115.556.52787.70.973.3median 15.3median 72.11.310.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 8 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.25 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.79 / 2.32 / 2.38 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 4.72 / 7.68 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
4500 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh		Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh		Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
4000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A40
3100 mAh		Average Mediatek Helio G90T
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
41%
17%
-3%
24%
-5%
10%
12%
Idle Minimum *
0.79
0.53
33%
0.72
9%
0.91
-15%
0.62
22%
0.8
-1%
0.685 (0.58 - 0.79, n=2)
13%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=883)
-13%
Idle Average *
2.32
1.18
49%
2.16
7%
2.41
-4%
1.77
24%
1.4
40%
2.03 (1.74 - 2.32, n=2)
12%
1.755 (0.6 - 6.2, n=882)
24%
Idle Maximum *
2.38
1.2
50%
2.17
9%
2.43
-2%
1.8
24%
2.3
3%
2.07 (1.76 - 2.38, n=2)
13%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=883)
14%
Load Average *
4.72
3.04
36%
3.32
30%
4.57
3%
3.42
28%
7.4
-57%
4.46 (4.19 - 4.72, n=2)
6%
4.1 (0.8 - 10.8, n=877)
13%
Load Maximum *
7.68
4.83
37%
5.34
30%
7.57
1%
6.14
20%
8.6
-12%
7.14 (6.59 - 7.68, n=2)
7%
6.07 (1.2 - 14.2, n=877)
21%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
31h 33min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 24min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
16h 24min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
3h 32min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
4500 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh		Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh		Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
4000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A40
3100 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
-20%
-28%
-28%
-1%
-6%
Reader / Idle
1893
1374
-27%
1006
-47%
1248
-34%
2139
13%
1689
-11%
H.264
984
853
-13%
620
-37%
685
-30%
859
-13%
825
-16%
WiFi v1.3
864
510
-41%
541
-37%
515
-40%
824
-5%
643
-26%
Load
212
218
3%
233
10%
198
-7%
217
2%
277
31%

Points positifs

+ allure et prise en main
+ 6 Go de RAM
+ Wifi rapide
+ autonomie
+ NFC
+ Bluetooth 5.0
+ stockage UFS 128 Go
+ performances du SoC Helio...

Points négatifs

- ...mais la puce graphique non adaptée au jeu
- chauffe
- haut-parleur
- (version chinoise : pas de bande LTE 20 ni de Widevine L3)

Verdict

En test : le Redmi Note 8 Pro. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par TradingShenzhen.
En test : le Redmi Note 8 Pro. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par TradingShenzhen.

Le dernier porte-étendard du milieu de gamme de Redmi fait bonne impression dans nos tests, et au vu de son prix contenu d’environ 220 € pour la version internationale, ne mérite pas vraiment de critiques. Cela dit, la chauffe et le throttling du SoC, ains que le haut-parleur mono médiocre et l’emplacement du capteur d’empreintes digitales doivent être pris en compte.

Alors que le Redmi Note 8 Pro ne devrait pas être le premier choix pour les joueurs, il est l’un des meilleurs smartphones du milieu de gamme actuellement disponibles.

Même si le Note 8 équipé d’un processeur Snapdragon peut sembler être un meilleur choix sur le papier, la version Pro avec le SoC MediaTek est capable d’obtenir de très bon résultats au quotidien, utilisation pour laquelle les performances sont adéquates, le processeur s’avérant aussi bon que les puces Qualcomm de série 700.

À la différence du Note 8, le modèle Pro du Redmi brille avec un bon appareil photo. Le Samsung GW1 prend des photos très détaillées de jour, du niveau du capteur Sony IMX 582.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro - 11/18/2019 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Châssis
87%
Clavier
67 / 75 → 90%
Dispositif de pointage
92%
Connectivité
50 / 70 → 71%
Poids
88%