Notebookcheck

Test du Motorola Moto G Pro : smartphone à petit prix avec stylet

Le premier smartphone avec stylet de Motorola. Un smartphone abordable avec un stylet - voilà qui est plutôt rare. Motorola tire son épingle du jeu en faisant du Moto G Pro une offre réussie : pour 330 €, l'on aura un smartphone de 6,4 pouces du milieu de gamme avec stylet intégré et Android One.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Felicitas Krohn (traduit par Prévots), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Bon (77%) Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665Qualcomm Adreno 610 Smartphone - 07/14/2020 - v7
Exemplaire de test fourni par Motorola Deutschland
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
, , , , , ,
relation de la recherche.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Motorola Moto G Pro (Moto G Gamme)
Processeur
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260
Carte graphique
Mémoire
4096 Mo 
Écran
6.40 pouces 19.2:9, 2300 x 1080 pixel 399 PPP, capacitif, IPS, FHD+, brillant: oui
Disque dur
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 Go 
, 109.2 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD jusqu'à 512 Go, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, gyroscope, capteur de proximité, capteur de luminosité ambiante, sensor hub, lecteur d'empreintes digitales, Wi-Fi Direct
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (bandes 2, 3, 5, 8), UMTS (bandes 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (bandes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71), DAS (tête) : 1,52 W/kg, DAS (corps) : 1,58 W/kg, Dual SIM, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 9.2 x 158.6 x 75.8
Batterie
4000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Android 10
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 48 MPix 48 MP (f/1,7, 1,6 µm) + lentille grand-angle 16 MP (f/2,2, 2,0 µm) + lentille macro 2 MP (f/2,2), autofocus laser, vidéos jusqu'en UHD 30 FPS
Appareil photo secondaire: 16 MPix f/2,0, 1 µm, vidéos jusqu'en Full HD 30 FPS
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo Dolby, Clavier: virtuel, stylet, chargeur modulaire 18 watt, câble USB (C vers A), outil pour carte SIM, guide de démarrage rapide, informations de garantie, Android One, 24 Mois Garantie, fanless
Poids
192 g, Alimentation: 35 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Appareils du comparatif

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Drive
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
77 %
09/20
Motorola Moto G Pro
SD 665, Adreno 610
192 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.40"2300x1080
79 %
02/20
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
SD 665, Adreno 610
200 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.30"2340x1080
78 %
04/20
Motorola Moto G8 Power
SD 665, Adreno 610
197 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.40"2300x1080
82 %
02/20
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18
199 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
80 %
10/18
LG Q Stylus
MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2
172 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.20"2160x1080

Comparaison des tailles

163.7 mm 76.1 mm 8.7 mm 199 g161.15 mm 75.4 mm 8.6 mm 200 g160.2 mm 77.8 mm 8.4 mm 172 g158.6 mm 75.8 mm 9.2 mm 192 g156 mm 76 mm 10 mm 197 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
415 (295min - 452max) MBit/s ∼100% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=292, last 2 years)
401 MBit/s ∼97% +20%
Motorola Moto G Pro
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
334 (326min - 340max) MBit/s ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
278 (218min - 305max) MBit/s ∼67% -17%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.9 (2min - 75max) MBit/s ∼11% -87%
LG Q Stylus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 32 GB eMMC Flash
36 (2min - 52max) MBit/s ∼9% -89%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=292, last 2 years)
408 MBit/s ∼100% +24%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
370 (342min - 372max) MBit/s ∼91% +12%
Motorola Moto G Pro
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
329 (313min - 345max) MBit/s ∼81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
315 (157min - 352max) MBit/s ∼77% -4%
LG Q Stylus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 32 GB eMMC Flash
61.5 (43min - 58max) MBit/s ∼15% -81%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
56.5 (11min - 75max) MBit/s ∼14% -83%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340336335318319337324342331315343329322332313345326314326338334324322330329326323317345334330336335318319337324342331315343329322332313345326314326338334324322330329326323317345334330326340334333335336333330332333333330337332329334333336334333335333336336332336333336333333Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø329 (313-345)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø334 (326-340)
Motorola Moto G Pro: vue générale.
Motorola Moto G Pro: vue générale.
Motorola Moto G Pro : virage.
Motorola Moto G Pro : virage.
Motorola Moto G Pro : pont.
Motorola Moto G Pro : pont.
Garmin Edge 520: vue générale.
Garmin Edge 520: vue générale.
Garmin Edge 520 : virage.
Garmin Edge 520 : virage.
Garmin Edge 520 : pont.
Garmin Edge 520 : pont.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Daylight scene 1Daylight scene 2Low-light environment
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker
16.4 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G Pro: 10.72 ∆E min: 1.62 - max: 17.25 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.2 ∆E
41 ∆E
30.8 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
46.3 ∆E
49.3 ∆E
23 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
49.6 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
41.2 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
23 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G Pro: 33.64 ∆E min: 13.2 - max: 49.61 ∆E
723
cd/m²
720
cd/m²
743
cd/m²
730
cd/m²
735
cd/m²
739
cd/m²
725
cd/m²
732
cd/m²
738
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 743 cd/m² Moyenne: 731.7 cd/m² Minimum: 7.2 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 97 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 735 cd/m²
Contraste: 1470:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.84 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
92.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.342
Motorola Moto G Pro
IPS, 2300x1080, 6.40
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.30
Motorola Moto G8 Power
IPS, 2300x1080, 6.40
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
LG Q Stylus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6.20
Screen
11%
-19%
-16%
-7%
Brightness middle
735
628
-15%
462
-37%
510
-31%
458
-38%
Brightness
732
631
-14%
483
-34%
536
-27%
441
-40%
Brightness Distribution
97
93
-4%
93
-4%
91
-6%
94
-3%
Black Level *
0.5
0.54
-8%
0.65
-30%
0.51
-2%
Contrast
1470
1163
-21%
711
-52%
898
-39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.84
2
66%
5.7
2%
6.6
-13%
4.5
23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.2
5.1
50%
8.9
13%
17.56
-72%
7.1
30%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.9
3.7
37%
6.5
-10%
2.9
51%
5.1
14%
Gamma
2.342 94%
2.17 101%
2.303 96%
2.242 98%
2.33 94%
CCT
7897 82%
6230 104%
8073 81%
6989 93%
7381 88%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 59.52 Hz ≤ 15 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 59.52 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 15 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 59.52 Hz est extrêmement faible, de grands risques de fatigue oculaire accrue et de maux de tête en cas d'utilisation prolongée.

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9720 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 151500) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
20 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 9 ms hausse
↘ 11 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
42 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 19 ms hausse
↘ 23 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (38.2 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
310 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
313 Points ∼56% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
311 Points ∼56% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (309 - 314, n=8)
311 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=217, last 2 years)
559 Points ∼100% +80%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1358 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1390 Points ∼72% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1385 Points ∼72% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1256 - 1421, n=8)
1356 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=217, last 2 years)
1923 Points ∼100% +42%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
365 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
368 Points ∼21% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
368 Points ∼21% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (363 - 368, n=5)
366 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (285 - 4739, n=53, last 2 years)
1712 Points ∼100% +369%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
450 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
432 Points ∼27% -4%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
464 Points ∼29% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (432 - 483, n=5)
455 Points ∼28% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=56, last 2 years)
1611 Points ∼100% +258%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8952 Points ∼91%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8804 Points ∼89% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6571 Points ∼66% -27%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
4101 Points ∼41% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7437 - 9051, n=10)
8163 Points ∼83% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=232, last 2 years)
9883 Points ∼100% +10%
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6962 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6587 Points ∼85% -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6963 Points ∼89% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5851 Points ∼75% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6189 - 11432, n=12)
6985 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=266, last 2 years)
7793 Points ∼100% +12%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24593 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23388 Points ∼60% -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25046 Points ∼64% +2%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
9905 Points ∼25% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (22445 - 25046, n=11)
23846 Points ∼61% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=218, last 2 years)
39249 Points ∼100% +60%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24804 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24871 Points ∼44% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25161 Points ∼45% +1%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
9864 Points ∼17% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15403 - 25351, n=11)
24085 Points ∼43% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=218, last 2 years)
56486 Points ∼100% +128%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23884 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19349 Points ∼78% -19%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24652 Points ∼100% +3%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
10050 Points ∼41% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (17865 - 24652, n=11)
20749 Points ∼84% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=218, last 2 years)
22928 Points ∼93% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1734 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1744 Points ∼37% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1764 Points ∼37% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4734 Points ∼100% +173%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
123 Points ∼3% -93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1675 - 1795, n=12)
1751 Points ∼37% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=259, last 2 years)
3311 Points ∼70% +91%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1607 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1616 Points ∼29% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1626 Points ∼29% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5586 Points ∼100% +248%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
98 Points ∼2% -94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1564 - 1663, n=12)
1623 Points ∼29% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=259, last 2 years)
3890 Points ∼70% +142%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2395 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2412 Points ∼78% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2507 Points ∼81% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3087 Points ∼100% +29%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1172 Points ∼38% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2282 - 2596, n=12)
2427 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=259, last 2 years)
2712 Points ∼88% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1782 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1785 Points ∼47% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1809 Points ∼48% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3744 Points ∼99% +110%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
565 Points ∼15% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1754 - 1810, n=12)
1787 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=271, last 2 years)
3797 Points ∼100% +113%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1668 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1663 Points ∼35% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1678 Points ∼35% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3958 Points ∼83% +137%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
495 Points ∼10% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1650 - 1692, n=12)
1669 Points ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=271, last 2 years)
4783 Points ∼100% +187%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2344 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2399 Points ∼76% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2493 Points ∼79% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3148 Points ∼100% +34%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1112 Points ∼35% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2199 - 2503, n=12)
2369 Points ∼75% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=269, last 2 years)
2837 Points ∼90% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1126 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1076 Points ∼27% -4%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1137 Points ∼28% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4022 Points ∼100% +257%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
112 Points ∼3% -90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1076 - 1152, n=12)
1119 Points ∼28% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=256, last 2 years)
2605 Points ∼65% +131%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
978 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
927 Points ∼21% -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
984 Points ∼22% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4422 Points ∼100% +352%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
89 Points ∼2% -91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (927 - 999, n=12)
970 Points ∼22% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=256, last 2 years)
2771 Points ∼63% +183%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2399 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2468 Points ∼81% +3%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2493 Points ∼82% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3056 Points ∼100% +27%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1172 Points ∼38% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2212 - 2580, n=12)
2418 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=256, last 2 years)
2764 Points ∼90% +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1137 Points ∼26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1139 Points ∼27% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1151 Points ∼27% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4291 Points ∼100% +277%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
379 Points ∼9% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1097 - 1151, n=11)
1135 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=268, last 2 years)
3095 Points ∼72% +172%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
990 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
990 Points ∼21% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
988 Points ∼21% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4806 Points ∼100% +385%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
319 Points ∼7% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (980 - 999, n=11)
988 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=268, last 2 years)
3443 Points ∼72% +248%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2369 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2410 Points ∼77% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2488 Points ∼80% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3120 Points ∼100% +32%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1110 Points ∼36% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2154 - 2541, n=11)
2377 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=268, last 2 years)
2900 Points ∼93% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1044 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1035 Points ∼29% -1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1047 Points ∼29% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3613 Points ∼100% +246%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1035 - 1140, n=12)
1074 Points ∼30% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 6977, n=210, last 2 years)
2631 Points ∼73% +152%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
908 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
897 Points ∼21% -1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
904 Points ∼22% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4201 Points ∼100% +363%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (897 - 995, n=12)
933 Points ∼22% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 11259, n=210, last 2 years)
2969 Points ∼71% +227%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2185 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2232 Points ∼72% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2354 Points ∼75% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3120 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2185 - 2444, n=12)
2281 Points ∼73% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=210, last 2 years)
2645 Points ∼85% +21%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
35 fps ∼60%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
33 fps ∼57% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +66%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
16 fps ∼28% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (30 - 52, n=10)
35.4 fps ∼61% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=216, last 2 years)
55.7 fps ∼96% +59%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼35%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼35% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
80 fps ∼78% +122%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
17 fps ∼17% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (35 - 37, n=10)
35.9 fps ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=216, last 2 years)
103 fps ∼100% +186%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps ∼35%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18 fps ∼32% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
57 fps ∼100% +185%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
6.7 fps ∼12% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15 - 34, n=10)
20.7 fps ∼36% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=214, last 2 years)
43.9 fps ∼77% +120%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼26%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼26% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
73 fps ∼100% +284%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
7.1 fps ∼10% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (19 - 20, n=10)
19.2 fps ∼26% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=215, last 2 years)
60.3 fps ∼83% +217%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
14 fps ∼30%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
12 fps ∼26% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
46 fps ∼100% +229%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
4.5 fps ∼10% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (10 - 27, n=10)
14.6 fps ∼32% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=212, last 2 years)
34.4 fps ∼75% +146%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼31%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼31% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
24 fps ∼58% +85%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
4.7 fps ∼11% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (13 - 13, n=10)
13 fps ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=212, last 2 years)
41.3 fps ∼100% +218%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.7 fps ∼31%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.6 fps ∼26% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
25 fps ∼100% +225%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
2.4 fps ∼10% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (5.7 - 13, n=10)
7.69 fps ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=211, last 2 years)
21.6 fps ∼86% +181%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼24%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼24% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
29 fps ∼100% +308%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
2.5 fps ∼9% -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.9 - 7.2, n=10)
7.07 fps ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=211, last 2 years)
24.7 fps ∼85% +248%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.6 fps ∼31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.4 fps ∼26% -14%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.6 fps ∼27% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
28 fps ∼100% +226%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
2 fps ∼7% -77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.2 - 15, n=12)
9.14 fps ∼33% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=272, last 2 years)
21.5 fps ∼77% +150%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.1 fps ∼26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.1 fps ∼26% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.1 fps ∼26% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
31 fps ∼100% +283%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
2.3 fps ∼7% -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7.8 - 8.4, n=12)
8.13 fps ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=272, last 2 years)
24.7 fps ∼80% +205%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5.1 fps ∼30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.4 fps ∼26% -14%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.5 fps ∼26% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
17 fps ∼100% +233%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1.3 fps ∼8% -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (3.9 - 9.1, n=12)
5.53 fps ∼33% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=273, last 2 years)
14.2 fps ∼84% +178%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼25% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼25% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
11 fps ∼100% +293%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
0.86 fps ∼8% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2.7 - 2.8, n=12)
2.78 fps ∼25% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=272, last 2 years)
9.78 fps ∼89% +249%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
173930 Points ∼52%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
168901 Points ∼51% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
329860 Points ∼99% +90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (167305 - 181432, n=9)
171951 Points ∼52% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=180, last 2 years)
333545 Points ∼100% +92%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2315 Points ∼66%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2238 Points ∼64% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3393 Points ∼96% +47%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
882 Points ∼25% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2001 - 2556, n=9)
2271 Points ∼64% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=200, last 2 years)
3524 Points ∼100% +52%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4666 Points ∼72%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4848 Points ∼75% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5707 Points ∼88% +22%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1868 Points ∼29% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (4391 - 5089, n=9)
4825 Points ∼75% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=200, last 2 years)
6467 Points ∼100% +39%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2765 Points ∼67%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2864 Points ∼70% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2771 Points ∼67% 0%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
778 Points ∼19% -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1804 - 3174, n=9)
2681 Points ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=200, last 2 years)
4114 Points ∼100% +49%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1907 Points ∼30%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1931 Points ∼30% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6444 Points ∼100% +238%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
633 Points ∼10% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1881 - 1932, n=9)
1906 Points ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=200, last 2 years)
5442 Points ∼84% +185%
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1168 Points ∼90%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
935 Points ∼72% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
1300 Points ∼100% +11%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
657 Points ∼51% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (926 - 1400, n=9)
1101 Points ∼85% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=200, last 2 years)
1249 Points ∼96% +7%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=183, last 2 years)
49.5 Points ∼100% +59%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
32.259 Points ∼65% +3%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
31.216 Points ∼63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22.9 - 31.2, n=6)
29.2 Points ∼59% -6%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=191, last 2 years)
88.1 Points ∼100% +80%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
62.949 Points ∼71% +29%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
48.855 Points ∼55%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
48.109 Points ∼55% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8)
47.5 Points ∼54% -3%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
19.174 Points ∼22% -61%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=162, last 2 years)
50.6 runs/min ∼100% +76%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chome 80)
39 runs/min ∼77% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (25.4 - 30.8, n=6)
28.9 runs/min ∼57% +1%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
28.73 runs/min ∼57%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=201, last 2 years)
77.1 Points ∼100% +40%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
72 Points ∼93% +31%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
56 Points ∼73% +2%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
55 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9)
50.9 Points ∼66% -7%
LG Q Stylus (Chrome 69)
25 Points ∼32% -55%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=210, last 2 years)
16957 Points ∼100% +85%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
12933 Points ∼76% +41%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
9153 Points ∼54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9)
8901 Points ∼52% -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
8675 Points ∼51% -5%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
3474 Points ∼20% -62%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
13202.5 ms * ∼100% -198%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9)
4783 ms * ∼36% -8%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
4663.6 ms * ∼35% -5%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
4433.6 ms * ∼34%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=213, last 2 years)
4220 ms * ∼32% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
3188.8 ms * ∼24% +28%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Motorola Moto G ProXiaomi Redmi Note 8TMotorola Moto G8 PowerSamsung Galaxy Note10 LiteLG Q StylusAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
2%
0%
52%
-30%
-6%
53%
Sequential Read 256KB
294.07
315.75
7%
300.9
2%
776.7
164%
241.7
-18%
289 (107 - 501, n=37)
-2%
727 (41.9 - 2037, n=278, last 2 years)
147%
Sequential Write 256KB
233.63
173.95
-26%
181.88
-22%
190.8
-18%
121.4
-48%
191 (90 - 314, n=37)
-18%
315 (11.9 - 1321, n=278, last 2 years)
35%
Random Read 4KB
65.51
90.38
38%
57.7
-12%
132
101%
31.45
-52%
77.1 (20.7 - 247, n=37)
18%
130 (13.5 - 325, n=278, last 2 years)
98%
Random Write 4KB
89.36
91.15
2%
132.63
48%
142
59%
12.07
-86%
44.9 (8.48 - 151, n=37)
-50%
114 (4.97 - 330, n=278, last 2 years)
28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
73.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
69.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
73.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
83.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
78 (29.2 - 154, n=33)
6%
76 (13.4 - 154, n=182, last 2 years)
4%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
55.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
52.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
49.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
59.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
63.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
14%
62.5 (26.1 - 81.9, n=33)
12%
58 (1.7 - 83.3, n=182, last 2 years)
4%
05101520252521242524252426252225232325252525162325252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252521242525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252526242624252525252525252326252525242426242525252524222525252424252523272425252425242525242525212724252524252525252525252525252525252524262425252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252524262425262525252525242625242625252426252525252425252524252525252525252325252525252525252525252425252525252525252525252525252525242524262524252525252525252525252525252525252525212425242524262522252323252525251623252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525212425252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525262426242525252525252523262525252424262425252525242225252524242525232724252524252425252425252127242525242525252525252525252525252525242624252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525242624252625252525252426252426252524262525252524252525242525252525252523252525252525252525252524252525252525252525252525252525252425242625242525252525252525252525252525252525910111111810101112111211111111101111121111108879999111211121312111098810101213121310131210121313141415141412111417131189877425231916151299109121491011111110111111141211119881012111313141111131110111112171515151313141518182021131010979810Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 0.19.0: Ø24.8 (16-27)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.3.4a: Ø11.6 (4-25)
 43.7 °C39.9 °C38.2 °C 
 43.9 °C39.6 °C38.4 °C 
 42.1 °C39 °C38.4 °C 
Maximum: 43.9 °C
Moyenne: 40.4 °C
37.6 °C39.7 °C44.1 °C
36.8 °C39.7 °C42.6 °C
35.9 °C38.9 °C41.3 °C
Maximum: 44.1 °C
Moyenne: 39.6 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  40.9 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.836.62539.940.13131.933.44038.936.65043.739.26329.830.38025.926.810026.326.512524.933.116021.644.82001950.725018.954.431518.155.440016.659.650016.265.563014.969.78001570.6100015.671.2125014.973.6160014.972.8200015.669.8250014.667.3315014.270.5400014.170.7500014.469.6630014.667.2800014.962.41000015.265.21250015.461.91600015.760.9SPL59.568.76666.36470.627.581.9N12.922.418.319.715.825.3152.5median 15.4median 65.5Delta2.18.745.247.543.745.234.836.937.640.739.542.136.636.329.130.128.429.130.533.924.742.322.851.621.955.421.559.319.962.120.767.719.271.118.772.42275.518.274.317.873.317.770.217.87217.67617.877.417.772.218.167.518.359.218.767.91972.619.46466.13185.1191.662.4median 19median 67.928.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G ProMotorola Moto G8 Power
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto G8 Power audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0 / 0.1 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 1.6 / 2.3 / 2.8 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 4.2 / 6.9 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Moto G Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Power
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
4500 mAh
LG Q Stylus
3300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
30%
30%
-9%
34%
17%
15%
Idle Minimum *
1.6
0.62
61%
0.9
44%
0.9
44%
0.69
57%
1.017 (0.62 - 1.7, n=11)
36%
0.932 (0.37 - 2.5, n=228, last 2 years)
42%
Idle Average *
2.3
1.77
23%
1.3
43%
1.6
30%
1.7
26%
1.893 (1.3 - 2.3, n=11)
18%
1.844 (0.82 - 3.94, n=228, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Maximum *
2.8
1.8
36%
1.6
43%
1.9
32%
1.73
38%
2.36 (1.6 - 3.5, n=11)
16%
2.11 (0.85 - 4.2, n=228, last 2 years)
25%
Load Average *
4.2
3.42
19%
3.2
24%
8.4
-100%
3.21
24%
3.77 (2.61 - 4.7, n=11)
10%
4.42 (2.1 - 8.4, n=228, last 2 years)
-5%
Load Maximum *
6.9
6.14
11%
7.1
-3%
10.3
-49%
5.31
23%
6.66 (5.12 - 7.7, n=11)
3%
7.22 (3.16 - 12.3, n=228, last 2 years)
-5%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
40h 50min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 12min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
14h 42min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
4h 50min
Motorola Moto G Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Power
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
4500 mAh
LG Q Stylus
3300 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
-4%
27%
5%
-39%
Reader / Idle
2450
2205
-10%
1529
-38%
H.264
882
1071
21%
527
-40%
WiFi v1.3
792
764
-4%
1002
27%
904
14%
419
-47%
Load
290
274
-6%
200
-31%

Points positifs

+ stylet
+ Android One
+ NFC
+ Wifi
+ appareil photo
+ luminosité de l'écran IPS
+ haut-parleurs Dolby

Points négatifs

- emplacement double SIM hybride
- MLI
- capacités de jeu

Verdict

En test : le Motorola Moto G Pro. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Motorola Allemagne.
En test : le Motorola Moto G Pro. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Motorola Allemagne.

Un smartphone à petit prix avec stylet : avec le Moto G Pro, Motorola répond à un besoin de niche, et propose un concurrent sérieux à la série Galaxy Note de Samsung.

Pour 330 €, l'on aura un smartphone du milieu de gamme bien équipé, avec un stylet qui, même s'il ne peut atteindre la précision de son concurrent Samsung, est tout à fait suffisant pour le quotidien.

Ceux qui voudraient un smartphone à prix contenu avec stylet devraient regarder du coté du Motorola Moto G Pro.

Notre seule critique liée au stylet est le nom du smartphone : "Moto G Pro" ne laisse en rien entendre que l'on bénéficiera des avantages d'un stylet... La version américaine du Moto G Pro est appelée "Moto G Stylus", mais elle est moins complète, ne possédant ni double SIM ni NFC, et son chargeur ne faisant que 10 W au lieu de 18.

Mais revenons au Moto G Pro lui-même : mis à part son stylet et ses qualités, l'expérience utilisateur est améliorée par des fonctionnalités comme des haut-parleurs Dolby, un écran IPS lumineux, un bon appareil photo, et un Wifi rapide. S'agissant d'un appareil Android One, il est aussi assuré de recevoir des mises à jour pendant au moins deux ans.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Motorola Moto G Pro - 07/14/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero

Châssis
82%
Clavier
60 / 75 → 81%
Dispositif de pointage
87%
Connectivité
43 / 70 → 61%
Poids
89%
Autonomie
90%
Écran
82%
Performances en jeu
13 / 64 → 20%
Performances dans les applications
59 / 86 → 68%
Chauffe
87%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Appareil photo
63%
Moyenne
72%
77%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Marius Schell
Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 267 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020
contact me via: LinkedIn
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Motorola Moto G Pro : smartphone à petit prix avec stylet
Manuel Masiero, 2020-09- 5 (Update: 2020-09- 5)