Notebookcheck

Test du Motorola One Zoom : le smartphone Motorola One qui n'est pas vraiment le numéro un

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduit par Prévots), 10/17/2019

Un capteur photo pour tous les diriger. Le système à quatre capteurs photo du One Zoom de Motorola est sensé s’adapter à toutes les circonstances. Découvrez comment le smartphone Motorola se comporte dans nos tests, et en quoi il se différencie des Motorola One précédents.

Motorola One Zoom (One Gamme)
Processeur
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
Carte graphique
Qualcomm Adreno 612
Mémoire
4096 Mo 
Écran
6.4 pouces 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPP, capacitif multitouch, OLED, brillant: oui
Disque dur
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 Go 
, 104 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD (jusqu'à 512GB), 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, gyroscope, capteur de proximité, boussole, OTG, LED de statut, radio FM, Miracast
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G : GSM bandes 2 / 3 / 5 / 8 3G : bandes 1 / 2 / 4 / 5 / 8 4G : LTE bandes 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 7 / 8 / 12 / 17 / 20 / 28 / 38 / 40 / 41 / 66, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.8 x 158 x 75
Batterie
4000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 48 MPix f/​1,7, autofocus à comparaison de phase, OIS, double flash LED, vidéos à 2160p / ​30 FPS (appareil photo 1) ; 16 MP, grand-angle (appareil photo 2) ; 8.0MP, zoom (appareil photo 3) ; 5.0 MP, profondeur de champ (appareil photo 4)
Appareil photo secondaire: 25 MPix f/​2.0, vidéos à 1080p / ​30 FPS
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, chargeur, câble USB, écouteurs, coque, Motorola UI, 24 Mois Garantie, DAS (tête) : 0,709W/​kg, DAS (corps) : 1,542W/​kg, DRM Widevine : L1, fanless
Poids
190 g, Alimentation: 34 g
Prix
429 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

NoteDateModèlePoidsÉpaisseurTailleRésolutionBest Price
79%10/19Motorola One Zoom
675, Adreno 612
190 g8.8 mm6.4"2340x1080
89%08/19Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
855, Adreno 640
191 g8.8 mm6.39"2340x1080
87%08/19Samsung Galaxy A80
730, Adreno 618
220 g9.3 mm6.7"2400x1080
85%07/19OnePlus 7
855, Adreno 640
182 g8.2 mm6.41"2340x1080
85%08/19LG G8s ThinQ
855, Adreno 640
181 g7.99 mm6.2"2248x1080
86%10/19Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
855, Adreno 640
190 g9.2 mm6.4"2340x1080
86%06/19Samsung Galaxy A70
675, Adreno 612
183 g7.9 mm6.7"2400x1080
82%07/19Google Pixel 3a XL
670, Adreno 616
167 g8.2 mm6"2160x1080
Test du Motorola One Zoom.
Test du Motorola One Zoom.
Test du Motorola One Zoom.
Test du Motorola One Zoom.

Comparaison des tailles

165.2 mm 76.5 mm 9.3 mm 220 g159.1 mm 75.44 mm 9.2 mm 190 g158 mm 75 mm 8.8 mm 190 g157.7 mm 74.8 mm 8.2 mm 182 g156.7 mm 74.3 mm 8.8 mm 191 g155.3 mm 76.6 mm 7.99 mm 181 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3a XL
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
668 (min: 617, max: 692) MBit/s ∼100% +98%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
578 (min: 474, max: 617) MBit/s ∼87% +72%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
447 (min: 201, max: 659) MBit/s ∼67% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Adreno 618, 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
428 (min: 360, max: 501) MBit/s ∼64% +27%
OnePlus 7
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
388 (min: 361, max: 421) MBit/s ∼58% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
383 (min: 242, max: 434) MBit/s ∼57% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Adreno 612, 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
338 (min: 302, max: 356) MBit/s ∼51% 0%
Motorola One Zoom
Adreno 612, 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
337 (min: 323, max: 346) MBit/s ∼50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=449)
228 MBit/s ∼34% -32%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3a XL
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
580 (min: 548, max: 602) MBit/s ∼100% +97%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
523 (min: 410, max: 563) MBit/s ∼90% +78%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
502 (min: 465, max: 517) MBit/s ∼87% +71%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
389 (min: 366, max: 444) MBit/s ∼67% +32%
OnePlus 7
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
330 (min: 232, max: 365) MBit/s ∼57% +12%
Motorola One Zoom
Adreno 612, 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
294 (min: 266, max: 318) MBit/s ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Adreno 618, 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (min: 249, max: 327) MBit/s ∼49% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Adreno 612, 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
264 (min: 221, max: 293) MBit/s ∼46% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=449)
217 MBit/s ∼37% -26%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø337 (323-346)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø294 (266-318)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Motorola One Zoom
GPS Motorola One Zoom
GPS Motorola One Zoom
GPS Motorola One Zoom
GPS Motorola One Zoom
GPS Motorola One Zoom

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker Photo
26.5 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
38.1 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
29.3 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola One Zoom: 29.33 ∆E min: 10.47 - max: 45.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
17.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
10 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola One Zoom: 8.87 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 18.9 ∆E
Test du Motorola One Zoom - Mire de test
Mire de test
Test du Motorola One Zoom - Mire de test en faible luminosité
Test du Motorola One Zoom - Détail de la mire de test
Test du Motorola One Zoom - Colorchecker
Test du Motorola One Zoom - Colorchecker
484
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 484 cd/m² Moyenne: 471.8 cd/m² Minimum: 5.01 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 95 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 461 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.9 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
Gamma: 2.12
Motorola One Zoom
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Samsung Galaxy A80
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
OnePlus 7
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
LG G8s ThinQ
P-OLED, 2248x1080, 6.2
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.4
Samsung Galaxy A70
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
Google Pixel 3a XL
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
Screen
42%
21%
31%
28%
22%
25%
35%
Brightness middle
461
594
29%
478
4%
603
31%
539
17%
569
23%
554
20%
409
-11%
Brightness
472
607
29%
486
3%
605
28%
556
18%
537
14%
552
17%
410
-13%
Brightness Distribution
95
91
-4%
96
1%
94
-1%
88
-7%
79
-17%
98
3%
96
1%
Black Level *
0.31
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.9
1.51
74%
2.97
50%
3.5
41%
3.78
36%
3.5
41%
3.3
44%
1.3
78%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.4
4.27
59%
10.18
2%
7.7
26%
6.95
33%
6
42%
9.2
12%
2.3
78%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.9
2.6
62%
2.5
64%
2.7
61%
2.2
68%
5.1
26%
3.4
51%
1.5
78%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.219 99%
2.031 108%
2.266 97%
2.274 97%
2.36 93%
2.08 106%
2.22 99%
CCT
8167 80%
6390 102%
6533 99%
6775 96%
6013 108%
6827 95%
6606 98%
6621 98%
Contrast
1835

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 250 Hz ≤ 99 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 250 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 99 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 250 Hz est relativement faible, les personnes les plus sensibles devraient percevoir un scintillement et être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire accrue (avec le niveau de luminosité indiqué)

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9266 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
2.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 1.6 ms hausse
↘ 1.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
8.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 4 ms hausse
↘ 4.4 ms chute
L'écran montre de faibles temps de réponse, un bon écran pour jouer.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (39.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
5466 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
7881 Points ∼100% +44%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7372 Points ∼94% +35%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7442 Points ∼94% +36%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7703 Points ∼98% +41%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
6104 Points ∼77% +12%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
6479 Points ∼82% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (5466 - 6104, n=2)
5785 Points ∼73% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=325)
4691 Points ∼60% -14%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
5998 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10976 Points ∼96% +83%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6826 Points ∼60% +14%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11388 Points ∼100% +90%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10274 Points ∼90% +71%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10878 Points ∼96% +81%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
6446 Points ∼57% +7%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5172 Points ∼45% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (5998 - 6446, n=2)
6222 Points ∼55% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=384)
4726 Points ∼41% -21%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
2266 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3429 Points ∼98% +51%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2436 Points ∼69% +8%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3510 Points ∼100% +55%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3406 Points ∼97% +50%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3444 Points ∼98% +52%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2380 Points ∼68% +5%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1616 Points ∼46% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (2266 - 2380, n=2)
2323 Points ∼66% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=384)
1426 Points ∼41% -37%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
7524 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9296 Points ∼95% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
7177 Points ∼73% -5%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9205 Points ∼94% +22%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9125 Points ∼93% +21%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9814 Points ∼100% +30%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
7315 Points ∼75% -3%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7377 Points ∼75% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (7315 - 7524, n=2)
7420 Points ∼76% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=387)
5331 Points ∼54% -29%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
9522 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11167 Points ∼86% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
8626 Points ∼66% -9%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
12095 Points ∼93% +27%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11890 Points ∼91% +25%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
13047 Points ∼100% +37%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
9288 Points ∼71% -2%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
9397 Points ∼72% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (9288 - 9522, n=2)
9405 Points ∼72% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14946, n=555)
5782 Points ∼44% -39%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
2324 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
2657 Points ∼80% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2708 Points ∼81% +17%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3324 Points ∼100% +43%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2794 Points ∼84% +20%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2492 Points ∼75% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2482 Points ∼75% +7%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2314 Points ∼70% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (2324 - 2482, n=2)
2403 Points ∼72% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=67)
2678 Points ∼81% +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
914 Points ∼16%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5702 Points ∼97% +524%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2160 Points ∼37% +136%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5862 Points ∼100% +541%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4236 Points ∼72% +363%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5747 Points ∼98% +529%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
914 Points ∼16% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1416 Points ∼24% +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (914 - 914, n=2)
914 Points ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=67)
2745 Points ∼47% +200%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
1066 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4548 Points ∼91% +327%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2262 Points ∼45% +112%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5012 Points ∼100% +370%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3800 Points ∼76% +256%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4454 Points ∼89% +318%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1063 Points ∼21% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1550 Points ∼31% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1063 - 1066, n=2)
1065 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=67)
2496 Points ∼50% +134%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
2378 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3280 Points ∼74% +38%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3160 Points ∼72% +33%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4416 Points ∼100% +86%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3309 Points ∼75% +39%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2840 Points ∼64% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2719 Points ∼62% +14%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2532 Points ∼57% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (2378 - 2719, n=2)
2549 Points ∼58% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4683, n=395)
1979 Points ∼45% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
851 Points ∼12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6739 Points ∼95% +692%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2438 Points ∼34% +186%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7089 Points ∼100% +733%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5184 Points ∼73% +509%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7069 Points ∼100% +731%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
949 Points ∼13% +12%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1612 Points ∼23% +89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (851 - 949, n=2)
900 Points ∼13% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=395)
1788 Points ∼25% +110%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
1097 Points ∼18%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5440 Points ∼87% +396%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2568 Points ∼41% +134%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6249 Points ∼100% +470%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4604 Points ∼74% +320%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5311 Points ∼85% +384%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1110 Points ∼18% +1%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1754 Points ∼28% +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1097 - 1110, n=2)
1104 Points ∼18% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=396)
1659 Points ∼27% +51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
2365 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3288 Points ∼70% +39%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3025 Points ∼64% +28%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4405 Points ∼94% +86%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3293 Points ∼70% +39%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4703 Points ∼100% +99%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2727 Points ∼58% +15%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2495 Points ∼53% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (2365 - 2727, n=2)
2546 Points ∼54% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=423)
1891 Points ∼40% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
1614 Points ∼16%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6730 Points ∼65% +317%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3635 Points ∼35% +125%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10302 Points ∼100% +538%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6358 Points ∼62% +294%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10290 Points ∼100% +538%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1571 Points ∼15% -3%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2537 Points ∼25% +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1571 - 1614, n=2)
1593 Points ∼15% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=423)
2388 Points ∼23% +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
1737 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5460 Points ∼67% +214%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3479 Points ∼43% +100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7940 Points ∼98% +357%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5268 Points ∼65% +203%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8141 Points ∼100% +369%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1734 Points ∼21% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2528 Points ∼31% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1734 - 1737, n=2)
1736 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=423)
2004 Points ∼25% +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
2567 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3724 Points ∼86% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3215 Points ∼74% +25%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4093 Points ∼95% +59%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3242 Points ∼75% +26%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4320 Points ∼100% +68%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2886 Points ∼67% +12%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2466 Points ∼57% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (2567 - 2886, n=2)
2727 Points ∼63% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4519, n=475)
1887 Points ∼44% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
823 Points ∼13%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6325 Points ∼100% +669%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2244 Points ∼35% +173%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6336 Points ∼100% +670%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6040 Points ∼95% +634%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6336 Points ∼100% +670%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
823 Points ∼13% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1487 Points ∼23% +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (823 - 823, n=2)
823 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=475)
1479 Points ∼23% +80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
969 Points ∼17%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5475 Points ∼96% +465%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2405 Points ∼42% +148%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5648 Points ∼99% +483%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5068 Points ∼89% +423%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5705 Points ∼100% +489%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
978 Points ∼17% +1%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1631 Points ∼29% +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (969 - 978, n=2)
974 Points ∼17% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=476)
1423 Points ∼25% +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
2743 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3726 Points ∼84% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3211 Points ∼72% +17%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4068 Points ∼91% +48%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3505 Points ∼79% +28%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4454 Points ∼100% +62%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2869 Points ∼64% +5%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2489 Points ∼56% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (2743 - 2869, n=2)
2806 Points ∼63% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4540, n=515)
1752 Points ∼39% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
1567 Points ∼16%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6325 Points ∼63% +304%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3478 Points ∼35% +122%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10008 Points ∼100% +539%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6122 Points ∼61% +291%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9973 Points ∼100% +536%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1427 Points ∼14% -9%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2428 Points ∼24% +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1427 - 1567, n=2)
1497 Points ∼15% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=514)
1937 Points ∼19% +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
1745 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5478 Points ∼70% +214%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3415 Points ∼44% +96%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7556 Points ∼97% +333%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5251 Points ∼67% +201%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7820 Points ∼100% +348%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1606 Points ∼21% -8%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2441 Points ∼31% +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1606 - 1745, n=2)
1676 Points ∼21% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8165, n=517)
1673 Points ∼21% -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
17876 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
27278 Points ∼81% +53%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
19389 Points ∼58% +8%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
30972 Points ∼92% +73%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33697 Points ∼100% +89%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
15948 Points ∼47% -11%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
14631 Points ∼43% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (15948 - 17876, n=2)
16912 Points ∼50% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=675)
14216 Points ∼42% -20%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
26734 Points ∼26%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
103955 Points ∼100% +289%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
51091 Points ∼49% +91%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
97354 Points ∼94% +264%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
26348 Points ∼25% -1%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
35596 Points ∼34% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (26348 - 26734, n=2)
26541 Points ∼26% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=673)
22187 Points ∼21% -17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
24078 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
63969 Points ∼97% +166%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
37475 Points ∼57% +56%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
65945 Points ∼100% +174%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
23013 Points ∼35% -4%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
26999 Points ∼41% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (23013 - 24078, n=2)
23546 Points ∼36% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=673)
17924 Points ∼27% -26%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
41 fps ∼25%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼100% +307%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
84 fps ∼50% +105%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼100% +307%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
85 fps ∼51% +107%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +307%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
41 fps ∼25% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
58 fps ∼35% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (41 - 41, n=2)
41 fps ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=694)
38.1 fps ∼23% -7%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
37 fps ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
69 fps ∼100% +86%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
59 fps ∼86% +59%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼87% +62%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼87% +62%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼87% +62%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
37 fps ∼54% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
53 fps ∼77% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (37 - 37, n=2)
37 fps ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=703)
28.1 fps ∼41% -24%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
21 fps ∼21%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
90 fps ∼90% +329%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
42 fps ∼42% +100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
100 fps ∼100% +376%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
50 fps ∼50% +138%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
97 fps ∼97% +362%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
20 fps ∼20% -5%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
29 fps ∼29% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (20 - 21, n=2)
20.5 fps ∼21% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=600)
21.9 fps ∼22% +4%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
19 fps ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +211%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
36 fps ∼60% +89%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +216%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps ∼85% +168%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +216%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
19 fps ∼32% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
28 fps ∼47% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (19 - 19, n=2)
19 fps ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=609)
19.4 fps ∼32% +2%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
14 fps ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
62 fps ∼90% +343%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼43% +114%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
67 fps ∼97% +379%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35 fps ∼51% +150%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +393%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
15 fps ∼22% +7%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
20 fps ∼29% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (14 - 15, n=2)
14.5 fps ∼21% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=466)
17.9 fps ∼26% +28%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
8.4 fps ∼15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
51 fps ∼89% +507%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
26 fps ∼46% +210%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼100% +579%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼63% +329%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
57 fps ∼100% +579%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
13 fps ∼23% +55%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
19 fps ∼33% +126%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (8.4 - 13, n=2)
10.7 fps ∼19% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=468)
16.7 fps ∼29% +99%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
3.1 fps ∼12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼65% +448%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps ∼38% +223%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼100% +739%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
14 fps ∼54% +352%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼92% +674%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
4.7 fps ∼18% +52%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7.2 fps ∼28% +132%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (3.1 - 4.7, n=2)
3.9 fps ∼15% +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=188)
10 fps ∼38% +223%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
4.8 fps ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼100% +400%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6.8 fps ∼28% +42%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼71% +254%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8.5 fps ∼35% +77%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼67% +233%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
3 fps ∼13% -37%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
4.5 fps ∼19% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (3 - 4.8, n=2)
3.9 fps ∼16% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=187)
7 fps ∼29% +46%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
8.3 fps ∼22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼95% +334%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼42% +93%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
38 fps ∼100% +358%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼58% +165%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼95% +334%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
8 fps ∼21% -4%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼29% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (8 - 8.3, n=2)
8.15 fps ∼21% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=192)
14.7 fps ∼39% +77%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
9.1 fps ∼21%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼98% +362%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼42% +98%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
43 fps ∼100% +373%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼51% +142%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼98% +362%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
9 fps ∼21% -1%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼28% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (9 - 9.1, n=2)
9.05 fps ∼21% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=192)
16.5 fps ∼38% +81%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
8.2 fps ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼86% +339%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼40% +107%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼100% +412%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼52% +168%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +412%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
8 fps ∼19% -2%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼26% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (8 - 8.2, n=2)
8.1 fps ∼19% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=391)
12.2 fps ∼29% +49%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
7.1 fps ∼17%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼100% +477%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps ∼37% +111%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
37 fps ∼90% +421%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
21 fps ∼51% +196%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼88% +407%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
7 fps ∼17% -1%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼27% +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (7 - 7.1, n=2)
7.05 fps ∼17% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=395)
10.9 fps ∼27% +54%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
159646 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
372734 Points ∼93% +133%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
202586 Points ∼51% +27%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
370908 Points ∼93% +132%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
321145 Points ∼81% +101%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
398720 Points ∼100% +150%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
167836 Points ∼42% +5%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
158868 Points ∼40% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (159646 - 167836, n=2)
163741 Points ∼41% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=296)
143587 Points ∼36% -10%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
1216 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1076 Points ∼76% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
1117 Points ∼79% -8%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1407 Points ∼100% +16%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1171 Points ∼83% -4%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1321 Points ∼94% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1259 Points ∼89% +4%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1186 Points ∼84% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1216 - 1259, n=2)
1238 Points ∼88% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 9387, n=635)
773 Points ∼55% -36%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
2278 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8700 Points ∼92% +282%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3855 Points ∼41% +69%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9477 Points ∼100% +316%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8414 Points ∼89% +269%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9416 Points ∼99% +313%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2272 Points ∼24% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2815 Points ∼30% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (2272 - 2278, n=2)
2275 Points ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=635)
2070 Points ∼22% -9%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
4068 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3922 Points ∼52% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3435 Points ∼46% -16%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5610 Points ∼75% +38%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4324 Points ∼58% +6%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7500 Points ∼100% +84%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
3285 Points ∼44% -19%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
3316 Points ∼44% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (3285 - 4068, n=2)
3677 Points ∼49% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=635)
1530 Points ∼20% -62%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
5940 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7423 Points ∼82% +25%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6484 Points ∼71% +9%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8986 Points ∼99% +51%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8718 Points ∼96% +47%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9094 Points ∼100% +53%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
6137 Points ∼67% +3%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5507 Points ∼61% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (5940 - 6137, n=2)
6039 Points ∼66% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=635)
2994 Points ∼33% -50%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
2860 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4045 Points ∼75% +41%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3129 Points ∼58% +9%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5089 Points ∼94% +78%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4389 Points ∼81% +53%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5397 Points ∼100% +89%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2756 Points ∼51% -4%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2794 Points ∼52% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (2756 - 2860, n=2)
2808 Points ∼52% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=635)
1501 Points ∼28% -48%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
63.057 Points ∼100% +40%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
59.651 Points ∼95% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
58.746 Points ∼93% +31%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
53.783 Points ∼85% +20%
Motorola One Zoom (Chrome 77)
44.908 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (43.4 - 44.9, n=2)
44.2 Points ∼70% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
43.423 Points ∼69% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
40.021 Points ∼63% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=106)
35.7 Points ∼57% -21%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
32.083 Points ∼51% -29%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
117.76 Points ∼100% +45%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
112.17 Points ∼95% +39%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
96.094 Points ∼82% +19%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
94.144 Points ∼80% +16%
Motorola One Zoom (Chrome 77)
80.943 Points ∼69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (80.8 - 80.9, n=2)
80.9 Points ∼69% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
80.828 Points ∼69% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
77.376 Points ∼66% -4%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
57.573 Points ∼49% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=531)
41.9 Points ∼36% -48%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
110 Points ∼100% +57%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
108 Points ∼98% +54%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
107 Points ∼97% +53%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
107 Points ∼97% +53%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
82 Points ∼75% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
77 Points ∼70% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (70 - 82, n=2)
76 Points ∼69% +9%
Motorola One Zoom (Chrome 77)
70 Points ∼64%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=165)
67 Points ∼61% -4%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼56% -11%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
25051 Points ∼100% +60%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
24313 Points ∼97% +55%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
23830 Points ∼95% +52%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
20598 Points ∼82% +31%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
16358 Points ∼65% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
15716 Points ∼63% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (15689 - 15716, n=2)
15703 Points ∼63% 0%
Motorola One Zoom (Chrome 77)
15689 Points ∼63%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
11056 Points ∼44% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=693)
6801 Points ∼27% -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=717)
10531 ms * ∼100% -264%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
3360.7 ms * ∼32% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
3027 ms * ∼29% -5%
Motorola One Zoom (Chrome 77)
2889.9 ms * ∼27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (2807 - 2890, n=2)
2848 ms * ∼27% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
2806.8 ms * ∼27% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
2333.5 ms * ∼22% +19%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
2036 ms * ∼19% +30%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
2029.5 ms * ∼19% +30%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
1958 ms * ∼19% +32%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Motorola One ZoomXiaomi Mi 9T ProSamsung Galaxy A80OnePlus 7LG G8s ThinQAsus ZenFone 6 ZS630KLSamsung Galaxy A70Google Pixel 3a XLAverage 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
22%
-28%
55%
-7%
27%
-16%
-29%
-13%
-43%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
51.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
46.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
62.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
22%
58.78 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
15%
55.9 (33.6 - 70.2, n=6)
9%
49.2 (1.7 - 87.1, n=428)
-4%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
69.44 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
87.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
25%
76.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
73.2 (54 - 83.4, n=6)
5%
67.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=428)
-3%
Random Write 4KB
110.76
148.51
34%
21.6
-80%
28.7
-74%
29.6
-73%
160.18
45%
21.95
-80%
86.96
-21%
54.6 (13.5 - 150, n=9)
-51%
22.3 (0.14 - 250, n=751)
-80%
Random Read 4KB
134.53
142.5
6%
117.5
-13%
175.3
30%
138
3%
153.29
14%
103.8
-23%
92.12
-32%
116 (88.4 - 173, n=9)
-14%
47.6 (1.59 - 196, n=751)
-65%
Sequential Write 256KB
256.6
196.87
-23%
190.4
-26%
392
53%
182.4
-29%
195.6
-24%
193.97
-24%
179.09
-30%
181 (143 - 257, n=9)
-29%
97.4 (2.99 - 590, n=751)
-62%
Sequential Read 256KB
470.52
808.76
72%
501.5
7%
1463
211%
791.1
68%
831.4
77%
508.48
8%
315.6
-33%
488 (409 - 733, n=9)
4%
275 (12.1 - 1504, n=751)
-42%
 28.8 °C30.1 °C35.1 °C 
 28.5 °C30 °C34.7 °C 
 28.6 °C30.2 °C33.6 °C 
Maximum: 35.1 °C
Moyenne: 31.1 °C
33.5 °C33 °C30.2 °C
33.1 °C33 °C29.9 °C
32.4 °C32.1 °C29.9 °C
Maximum: 33.5 °C
Moyenne: 31.9 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  32 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.7322527.622.33130.635.14024.834.25032.739.86324.629.48023.225.510019.223.312517.933.316016.553.220015.251.325017.355.131517.254.640016.85750014.660.46301465.680014.768.9100014.770.9125014.869.916001567.8200014.966.125001568315014.670.740001471.1500015.166630014.666.2800014.862.21000015.155.51250015.1531600015.556.2SPL2780N0.946.7median 15median 62.2Delta0.47.143.947.343.642.638.339.738.339.441.242.434.1352729.728.631.827.932.726.145.825.150.62253.320.55720.561.120.665.618.668.518.171.218.577.817.975.518.676.817.877.317.577.616.976.216.868.61769.51775.617.280.917.179.617.162.117.347.878.865.174.766.430.387.942.119.134.418.71.472.9median 18.1median 68.62.712.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola One ZoomXiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola One Zoom audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.22 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.69 / 1.54 / 1.57 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 4.1 / 5.79 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola One Zoom
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A80
3700 mAh
OnePlus 7
3700 mAh
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-10%
0%
-4%
-40%
-40%
-1%
-14%
Idle Minimum *
0.69
0.7
-1%
0.6
13%
0.6
13%
1.2
-74%
0.81
-17%
0.675 (0.66 - 0.69, n=2)
2%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=781)
-28%
Idle Average *
1.54
1
35%
1.2
22%
1.1
29%
1.6
-4%
2.35
-53%
1.615 (1.54 - 1.69, n=2)
-5%
1.74 (0.6 - 6.2, n=780)
-13%
Idle Maximum *
1.57
1.3
17%
1.4
11%
2
-27%
2
-27%
2.37
-51%
1.685 (1.57 - 1.8, n=2)
-7%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=781)
-29%
Load Average *
4.1
5.2
-27%
5
-22%
4
2%
5
-22%
5.33
-30%
3.76 (3.42 - 4.1, n=2)
8%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=775)
1%
Load Maximum *
5.79
10
-73%
7.1
-23%
8
-38%
10
-73%
8.55
-48%
5.84 (5.79 - 5.88, n=2)
-1%
5.92 (1.2 - 14.2, n=775)
-2%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 44min
Motorola One Zoom
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A80
3700 mAh
OnePlus 7
3700 mAh
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
5000 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3
644
762
18%
713
11%
901
40%
693
8%
801
24%

Points positifs

+ design
+ jack 3,5 mm
+ GPS
+ nombre de bandes LTE
+ écran OLED
+ autonomie
+ appareils photo

Points négatifs

- photo en faible luminosité
- haut-parleur mono (mais pas mauvais)
- SoC Snapdragon
- performances de jeu
- luminosité de l'écran
- lecteur d'empreintes digitales
En test : le Motorola One Zoom. Modèle de test fourni par Motorola Allemagne.
En test : le Motorola One Zoom. Modèle de test fourni par Motorola Allemagne.

Alors que le One Zoom ne propose pas tout ce que la série One pouvait offrir précédemment, il propose néanmoins beaucoup de choses. Mais pas à son prix actuel de plus de 400 $.

Comme le smartphone Pixel 3a de Google, le One Zoom souffre du choix de Motorola d’intégrer un SoC comparativement lent du milieu de gamme. Mais le Pixel possède d’excellents haut-parleurs stéréos, Android Vanilla, et de très bons appareils photo, autant d’éléments que ne propose pas le Motorola Zoom.

Motorola prouve une fois de plus qu’il peut construire d’excellents smartphones du milieu de gamme - le Motorola One Zoom serait un excellent choix dans les 300 - 250 $.

Le dernier smartphone de la série One de Motorola propose un écran OLED correct et agréable à regarder, un design plaisant, une bonne connectivité, et des performances honnêtes. Il peut ainsi se mesurer à un Xiaomi Mi 9T. Mais ce dernier est disponible à un prix bien inférieur, et même la version Pro peut être trouvée à moins cher que le One Zoom de Motorola.s

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Motorola One Zoom - 10/08/2019 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Châssis
84%
Clavier
67 / 75 → 90%
Dispositif de pointage
91%
Connectivité
49 / 70 → 70%
Poids
89%
Autonomie
89%
Écran
81%
Performances en jeu
14 / 64 → 21%
Performances dans les applications
65 / 86 → 75%
Chauffe
93%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
69 / 90 → 76%
Appareil photo
65%
Moyenne
73%
79%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Motorola One Zoom : le smartphone Motorola One qui n'est pas vraiment le numéro un
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-10-17 (Update: 2019-10-17)