Notebookcheck

Test du Samsung Galaxy M31 : un smartphone moyen avec quelques points forts

Le "M" de Milieu de gamme. Alors que le Samsung Galaxy M31 n'est pas disponible partout, il s'agit d'un smartphone du milieu de gamme intéressant, avec une énorme batterie et quatre capteurs photo. Cependant, avec son stockage de taille réduite, le smartphone vaut-il vraiment le coup ?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Felicitas Krohn (traduit par Prévots), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Galaxy M Gamme)
Processeur
Samsung Exynos 9611 8 x 1.7 - 2.3 GHz, Exynos 7 Series
Carte graphique
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Mémoire
6144 Mo 
Écran
6.40 pouces 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPP, capacitif, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, brillant: oui, 60 Hz
Disque dur
64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 Go 
, 64 Go / 128 Go, 49 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD jusqu'à 512 Go, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, gyroscope, boussole, USB C
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850 / ​900 / ​1 800 / ​1 900), 3G (B1 / ​B2 / ​B4 / ​B5 / ​B8), 4G (B1 / ​B2 / ​B3 / ​B4 / ​B5 / ​B7 / ​B8 / ​B12 / ​B13 / ​B17 / ​B20 / ​B26 / ​B28 / ​B38 / ​B40 / ​B41 / ​B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.9 x 159.2 x 75.1
Batterie
6000 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Android 10
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 64 MPix f/​1,8, autofocus à comparaison de phase, flash LED, vidéos à 2160p / ​30 FPS (appareil photo 1) ; 8.0 MP, f/2,2, lentille grand-angle (appareil photo 2) ; 5.0 MP, f/2,4, lentille macro (appareil photo 3) ; 5.0 MP, f/2,2, capteur de profondeur de c
Appareil photo secondaire: 32 MPix f/2,0, 26mm, 1 / 2.8", 0.8µm
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono sur la tranche inférieure, Clavier: virtuel, chargeur, câble USB, outil pour carte SIM, 24 Mois Garantie, DAS: 0.482 W/​kg (tête), 1,127 W/​kg (corps) ; LTE : 600 Mbit/s (réception), 150 Mbit/s (envoi), fanless
Poids
191 g, Alimentation: 57 g
Prix
270 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
relation de la recherche.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Appareils du comparatif

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Drive
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
80 %
08/20
Samsung Galaxy M31
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
191 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.40"2340x1080
79 %
08/20
Samsung Galaxy A41
Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2
152 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.10"2400x1080
83 %
08/20
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
80 %
08/20
realme 6 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
195 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2400x1080
79 %
02/20
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
159 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.15"2312x1080
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Galaxy M31

Comparaison des tailles

165.75 mm 76.68 mm 8.8 mm 209 g163.8 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 195 g159.2 mm 75.1 mm 8.9 mm 191 g152.9 mm 72.7 mm 7.4 mm 159 g149.9 mm 69.8 mm 7.9 mm 152 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s ∼100% +86%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=292, last 2 years)
401 MBit/s ∼73% +35%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
349 (339min - 355max) MBit/s ∼63% +18%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
297 (258min - 312max) MBit/s ∼54%
realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
290 (137min - 336max) MBit/s ∼53% -2%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
224 (197min - 260max) MBit/s ∼41% -25%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
619 (283min - 670max) MBit/s ∼100% +84%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=292, last 2 years)
408 MBit/s ∼66% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
365 (349min - 370max) MBit/s ∼59% +9%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
336 (282min - 350max) MBit/s ∼54%
realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
292 (145min - 352max) MBit/s ∼47% -13%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
189 (80min - 224max) MBit/s ∼31% -44%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340282325337339330346326333341346339339348344350335346336338335284335331341349345337343338338282325337339330346326333341346339339348344350335346336338335284335331341349345337343338338289303302307301294302307291303292302272258293309299308298297311305294293298312298293275302Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø335 (282-350)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø297 (258-312)
Samsung Galaxy M31 localisation : vue générale.
Samsung Galaxy M31 localisation : vue générale.
Samsung Galaxy M31 localisation : virage.
Samsung Galaxy M31 localisation : virage.
Samsung Galaxy M31 localisation : pont.
Samsung Galaxy M31 localisation : pont.
Garmin Edge 520 localisation : vue générale.
Garmin Edge 520 localisation : vue générale.
Garmin Edge 520 localisation : virage.
Garmin Edge 520 localisation : virage.
Garmin Edge 520 localisation : pont.
Garmin Edge 520 localisation : pont.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker
18.5 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
16 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M31: 13.07 ∆E min: 3.76 - max: 24.83 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.5 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
50.2 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
28.5 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
47.6 ∆E
47.6 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
46.6 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
45.5 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
33 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M31: 34.7 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 50.22 ∆E
620
cd/m²
615
cd/m²
616
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
622
cd/m²
619
cd/m²
607
cd/m²
611
cd/m²
606
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 622 cd/m² Moyenne: 615.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.98 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 97 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 622 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.25 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
142% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.019
Samsung Galaxy M31
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.40
Samsung Galaxy A41
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
realme 6 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.60
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
IPS, 2312x1080, 6.15
Screen
1%
11%
-69%
-48%
Brightness middle
622
554
-11%
610
-2%
442
-29%
507
-18%
Brightness
615
559
-9%
579
-6%
419
-32%
481
-22%
Brightness Distribution
97
92
-5%
92
-5%
90
-7%
88
-9%
Black Level *
0.37
0.37
0.38
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.25
2
11%
1.8
20%
6.1
-171%
4.72
-110%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.22
7.7
-24%
3
52%
9.7
-56%
7.84
-26%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.7
1.6
41%
2.5
7%
5.9
-119%
5.5
-104%
Gamma
2.019 109%
2.11 104%
2.31 95%
2.35 94%
2.158 102%
CCT
6810 95%
6589 99%
6864 95%
7631 85%
7596 86%
Contrast
1649
1195
1334

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 208 Hz

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 208 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) .

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 208 Hz est relativement faible, les personnes les plus sensibles devraient percevoir un scintillement et être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire accrue (avec le niveau de luminosité indiqué)

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9720 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 151500) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 3 ms hausse
↘ 5 ms chute
L'écran montre de faibles temps de réponse, un bon écran pour jouer.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
9 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 6 ms hausse
↘ 3 ms chute
L'écran montre de faibles temps de réponse, un bon écran pour jouer.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.2 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
348 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
357 Points ∼63% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
569 Points ∼100% +64%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
567 Points ∼100% +63%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (345 - 349, n=4)
347 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=217, last 2 years)
559 Points ∼98% +61%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1325 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1222 Points ∼64% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1771 Points ∼92% +34%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1759 Points ∼91% +33%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1207 - 1387, n=4)
1310 Points ∼68% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=217, last 2 years)
1923 Points ∼100% +45%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1605 Points ∼76%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1565 - 1605, n=3)
1592 Points ∼75% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=113, last 2 years)
2125 Points ∼100% +32%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1345 Points ∼66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1208 - 1345, n=3)
1299 Points ∼64% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=109, last 2 years)
2032 Points ∼100% +51%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
6202 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7594 Points ∼55% +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
9091 Points ∼66% +47%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
13777 Points ∼100% +122%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
7593 Points ∼55% +22%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5777 - 6697, n=7)
6166 Points ∼45% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=232, last 2 years)
9883 Points ∼72% +59%
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5587 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6742 Points ∼67% +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7829 Points ∼77% +40%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
10106 Points ∼100% +81%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6042 Points ∼60% +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5080 - 5925, n=7)
5572 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=266, last 2 years)
7793 Points ∼77% +39%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
23836 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
20885 Points ∼53% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38315 Points ∼98% +61%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
33926 Points ∼86% +42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (16738 - 24052, n=6)
21849 Points ∼56% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=218, last 2 years)
39249 Points ∼100% +65%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
25160 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
22232 Points ∼39% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
51789 Points ∼92% +106%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
53600 Points ∼95% +113%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (15971 - 25625, n=6)
23092 Points ∼41% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=218, last 2 years)
56486 Points ∼100% +125%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
20128 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
17231 Points ∼75% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20054 Points ∼87% 0%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
14849 Points ∼65% -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (13103 - 20393, n=6)
18907 Points ∼82% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=218, last 2 years)
22928 Points ∼100% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2056 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1229 Points ∼35% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3534 Points ∼100% +72%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3528 Points ∼100% +72%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1004 Points ∼28% -51%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1595 - 2110, n=6)
1958 Points ∼55% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=259, last 2 years)
3311 Points ∼94% +61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2020 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1093 Points ∼28% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3620 Points ∼93% +79%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3683 Points ∼95% +82%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
870 Points ∼22% -57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1468 - 2092, n=6)
1944 Points ∼50% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=259, last 2 years)
3890 Points ∼100% +93%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2195 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2181 Points ∼67% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3263 Points ∼100% +49%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3076 Points ∼94% +40%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2179 Points ∼67% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1390 - 2286, n=6)
2079 Points ∼64% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=259, last 2 years)
2712 Points ∼83% +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2055 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1630 Points ∼43% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3645 Points ∼96% +77%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3651 Points ∼96% +78%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1382 Points ∼36% -33%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1662 - 2074, n=6)
1903 Points ∼50% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=271, last 2 years)
3797 Points ∼100% +85%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1993 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1486 Points ∼31% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3785 Points ∼79% +90%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3835 Points ∼80% +92%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1261 Points ∼26% -37%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1601 - 2021, n=6)
1873 Points ∼39% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=271, last 2 years)
4783 Points ∼100% +140%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2308 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2466 Points ∼76% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3226 Points ∼100% +40%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3125 Points ∼97% +35%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2084 Points ∼65% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1402 - 2336, n=6)
2087 Points ∼65% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=269, last 2 years)
2837 Points ∼88% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1601 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1160 Points ∼45% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2499 Points ∼96% +56%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2514 Points ∼97% +57%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
858 Points ∼33% -46%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1342 - 1601, n=7)
1524 Points ∼59% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=256, last 2 years)
2605 Points ∼100% +63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1478 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1016 Points ∼37% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2356 Points ∼85% +59%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2388 Points ∼86% +62%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
730 Points ∼26% -51%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1203 - 1478, n=7)
1422 Points ∼51% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=256, last 2 years)
2771 Points ∼100% +87%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2258 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2296 Points ∼72% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3170 Points ∼100% +40%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3083 Points ∼97% +37%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2207 Points ∼70% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1415 - 2258, n=7)
2084 Points ∼66% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=256, last 2 years)
2764 Points ∼87% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1659 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1179 Points ∼38% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2667 Points ∼86% +61%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2656 Points ∼86% +60%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
967 Points ∼31% -42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1390 - 1659, n=7)
1588 Points ∼51% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=268, last 2 years)
3095 Points ∼100% +87%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1533 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1028 Points ∼30% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2539 Points ∼74% +66%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2558 Points ∼74% +67%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
838 Points ∼24% -45%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1267 - 1533, n=7)
1488 Points ∼43% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=268, last 2 years)
3443 Points ∼100% +125%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2332 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2427 Points ∼75% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3236 Points ∼100% +39%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3067 Points ∼95% +32%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2092 Points ∼65% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1463 - 2332, n=7)
2115 Points ∼65% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=268, last 2 years)
2900 Points ∼90% +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1557 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1148 Points ∼44% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2340 Points ∼89% +50%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2317 Points ∼88% +49%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
927 Points ∼35% -40%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1442 - 1557, n=7)
1525 Points ∼58% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 6977, n=210, last 2 years)
2631 Points ∼100% +69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1442 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1005 Points ∼34% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2250 Points ∼76% +56%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2255 Points ∼76% +56%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
796 Points ∼27% -45%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1320 - 1442, n=7)
1414 Points ∼48% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 11259, n=210, last 2 years)
2969 Points ∼100% +106%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2163 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2281 Points ∼84% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2721 Points ∼100% +26%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2562 Points ∼94% +18%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2196 Points ∼81% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1972 - 2163, n=7)
2099 Points ∼77% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=210, last 2 years)
2645 Points ∼97% +22%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
32 fps ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
37 fps ∼62% +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +88%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +88%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
31 fps ∼52% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (25 - 44, n=7)
35.1 fps ∼59% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=216, last 2 years)
55.7 fps ∼93% +74%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
36 fps ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
39 fps ∼38% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
85 fps ∼83% +136%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
85 fps ∼83% +136%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
33 fps ∼32% -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (28 - 48, n=7)
39.1 fps ∼38% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=216, last 2 years)
103 fps ∼100% +186%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
19 fps ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
20 fps ∼46% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼89% +105%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
38 fps ∼87% +100%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
16 fps ∼36% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (15 - 24, n=7)
19.9 fps ∼45% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=214, last 2 years)
43.9 fps ∼100% +131%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
18 fps ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
21 fps ∼35% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼68% +128%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
41 fps ∼68% +128%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
18 fps ∼30% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (17 - 26, n=7)
20.4 fps ∼34% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=215, last 2 years)
60.3 fps ∼100% +235%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
14 fps ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼38% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼84% +107%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
27 fps ∼78% +93%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
11 fps ∼32% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (8.9 - 14, n=7)
13.3 fps ∼39% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=212, last 2 years)
34.4 fps ∼100% +146%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
16 fps ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼31% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼73% +88%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼73% +88%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
12 fps ∼29% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (10 - 16, n=7)
14.7 fps ∼36% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=212, last 2 years)
41.3 fps ∼100% +158%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
9.1 fps ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.7 fps ∼36% -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼79% +87%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼74% +76%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
7.3 fps ∼34% -20%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5.5 - 9.6, n=7)
8.53 fps ∼39% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=211, last 2 years)
21.6 fps ∼100% +137%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10 fps ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8.1 fps ∼33% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼73% +80%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼73% +80%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.4 fps ∼26% -36%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (6.4 - 10, n=7)
9.43 fps ∼38% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=211, last 2 years)
24.7 fps ∼100% +147%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
9.4 fps ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps ∼35% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼79% +81%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼79% +81%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.4 fps ∼30% -32%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (8.8 - 9.7, n=7)
9.26 fps ∼43% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=272, last 2 years)
21.5 fps ∼100% +129%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10 fps ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps ∼30% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼73% +80%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
19 fps ∼77% +90%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.9 fps ∼28% -31%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (7.8 - 10, n=7)
9.66 fps ∼39% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=272, last 2 years)
24.7 fps ∼100% +147%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5.7 fps ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4.9 fps ∼35% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼77% +93%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
11 fps ∼77% +93%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
4.2 fps ∼30% -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5.5 - 8.3, n=7)
6.01 fps ∼42% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=273, last 2 years)
14.2 fps ∼100% +149%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3.6 fps ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2.8 fps ∼29% -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.9 fps ∼71% +92%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
7 fps ∼72% +94%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2.6 fps ∼27% -28%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (3.5 - 3.6, n=7)
3.56 fps ∼36% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=272, last 2 years)
9.78 fps ∼100% +172%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
187087 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
157473 Points ∼47% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
271934 Points ∼82% +45%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
275464 Points ∼83% +47%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
185725 Points ∼56% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (152185 - 187087, n=7)
175473 Points ∼53% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=180, last 2 years)
333545 Points ∼100% +78%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
649 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1901 Points ∼54% +193%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3444 Points ∼98% +431%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3481 Points ∼99% +436%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2153 Points ∼61% +232%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (634 - 2191, n=7)
1418 Points ∼40% +118%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=200, last 2 years)
3524 Points ∼100% +443%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4699 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5142 Points ∼74% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6856 Points ∼99% +46%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
6908 Points ∼100% +47%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
4909 Points ∼71% +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2839 - 4978, n=7)
4361 Points ∼63% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=200, last 2 years)
6467 Points ∼94% +38%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1775 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2148 Points ∼47% +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4452 Points ∼97% +151%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
4573 Points ∼100% +158%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2993 Points ∼65% +69%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1291 - 2122, n=7)
1706 Points ∼37% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=200, last 2 years)
4114 Points ∼90% +132%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2168 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1113 Points ∼20% -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3757 Points ∼69% +73%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3768 Points ∼69% +74%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1466 Points ∼27% -32%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2127 - 2168, n=7)
2149 Points ∼39% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=200, last 2 years)
5442 Points ∼100% +151%
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1062 Points ∼85% +10520%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1226 Points ∼98% +12160%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1233 Points ∼99% +12230%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
998 Points ∼80% +9880%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (10 - 1202, n=7)
620 Points ∼50% +6100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=200, last 2 years)
1249 Points ∼100% +12390%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=183, last 2 years)
49.5 Points ∼100% +78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
47.901 Points ∼97% +72%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
32.643 Points ∼66% +17%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
31.333 Points ∼63% +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (27.5 - 30.6, n=7)
28.2 Points ∼57% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
27.807 Points ∼56%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
89.577 Points ∼100% +89%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=191, last 2 years)
88.1 Points ∼98% +85%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
86.75 Points ∼97% +83%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
55.972 Points ∼62% +18%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
50.919 Points ∼57% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (47.5 - 51.9, n=7)
50.4 Points ∼56% +6%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
47.5 Points ∼53%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=162, last 2 years)
50.6 runs/min ∼100% +72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
45.2 runs/min ∼89% +54%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
31.4 runs/min ∼62% +7%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chome 83)
29.4 runs/min ∼58%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (26.6 - 30.5, n=7)
29 runs/min ∼57% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
27.8 runs/min ∼55% -5%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=201, last 2 years)
77.1 Points ∼100% +38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
71 Points ∼92% +27%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
67 Points ∼87% +20%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
56 Points ∼73%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (46 - 57, n=7)
53.4 Points ∼69% -5%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
52 Points ∼67% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
52 Points ∼67% -7%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
17265 Points ∼100% +65%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
17157 Points ∼99% +64%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=210, last 2 years)
16957 Points ∼98% +63%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
10499 Points ∼61% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
10434 Points ∼60%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (7442 - 10687, n=7)
9667 Points ∼56% -7%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
9549 Points ∼55% -8%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (4332 - 6212, n=7)
4863 ms * ∼100% -2%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
4786.2 ms * ∼98%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
4317.8 ms * ∼89% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=213, last 2 years)
4220 ms * ∼87% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
3778.9 ms * ∼78% +21%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
3033.1 ms * ∼62% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
2850.1 ms * ∼59% +40%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Samsung Galaxy M31Samsung Galaxy A41Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Prorealme 6 ProHuawei P30 Lite New EditionAverage 64 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-18%
-10%
7%
37%
-15%
11%
Sequential Read 256KB
489.5
299.89
-39%
498.15
2%
512.61
5%
800.3
63%
491 (272 - 687, n=15)
0%
727 (41.9 - 2037, n=278, last 2 years)
49%
Sequential Write 256KB
221.7
211.05
-5%
171.09
-23%
203.28
-8%
391.1
76%
182 (135 - 222, n=15)
-18%
315 (11.9 - 1321, n=278, last 2 years)
42%
Random Read 4KB
128.9
84
-35%
122.58
-5%
158.66
23%
198.7
54%
115 (60.6 - 157, n=15)
-11%
130 (13.5 - 325, n=278, last 2 years)
1%
Random Write 4KB
152.4
72.53
-52%
112.93
-26%
154
1%
171.6
13%
78.1 (13.6 - 196, n=15)
-49%
114 (4.97 - 330, n=278, last 2 years)
-25%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
74.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
76.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
86.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
16%
76.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
73.4 (36.8 - 85.4, n=10)
-1%
76 (13.4 - 154, n=182, last 2 years)
2%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
54.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-10%
63.43 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
66.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
55.4 (33.3 - 65.3, n=10)
-9%
58 (1.7 - 83.3, n=182, last 2 years)
-5%
05101520253035404550556059564350525252495452515856596060585860605851525859576058596060595858575858595449495050555760526053535360495151515457544849554849454646495048485558595958434044475148504652565256525660575560576057555958605354605760525860586060596056535853586060595957605756535254585960605957525458595956435052525249545251585659606058586060585152585957605859606059585857585859544949505055576052605353536049515151545754484955484945464649504848555859595843404447514850465256525652566057556057605755595860535460576052586058606059605653585358606059595760575653525458596060595752545859343535343032252032323032293129302928282726272626202627242623252524202426252424212419222129353341364040383640373938414040394139403937373640394040404136364040364040404039353737393836363433333335363332383736293633352936303233343834303233352730333129302830262828292826265956435052525249545251585659606058586060585152585957605859606059585857585859544949505055576052605353536049515151545754484955484945464649504848555859595843404447514850465256525652566057556057605755595860535460576052586058606059605653585358606059595760575653525458596060595752545859343535343032252032323032293129302928282726272626202627242623252524202426252424212419222129353341364040383640373938414040394139403937373640394040404136364040364040404039353737393836363433333335363332383736293633352936303233343834303233352730333129302830262828292826262429303026222628302428303129303030312930301528303030303030303030293031303030303030303030302630303030303059564350525252495452515856596060585860605851525859576058596060595858575858595449495050555760526053535360495151515457544849554849454646495048485558595958434044475148504652565256525660575560576057555958605354605760525860586060596056535853586060595957605756535254585960605957525458593435353430322520323230322931293029282827262726262026272426232525242024262524242124192221293533413640403836403739384140403941394039373736403940404041363640403640404040393537373938363634333333353633323837362936333529363032333438343032333527303331293028302628282928262624293030262226283024283031293030303129303015283030303030303030302930313030303030303030303026303030303030192527262224222430282913103220312930302929282923102725303030302829282525242625282827303030302828302929292831272925Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.18.0: Ø55 (40-60)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.18.0: Ø32.4 (19-41)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.3.4a: Ø29 (15-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.3.4a: Ø26.6 (10-32)
 43.6 °C37.9 °C35 °C 
 42.9 °C37.9 °C35.4 °C 
 41.2 °C36.4 °C35.4 °C 
Maximum: 43.6 °C
Moyenne: 38.4 °C
33.5 °C36.8 °C41.7 °C
34.6 °C36.5 °C42.7 °C
35.4 °C37.3 °C41.3 °C
Maximum: 42.7 °C
Moyenne: 37.8 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  42.1 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.836.12539.940.83131.935.14038.934.15043.736.66329.835.38025.925.910026.326.312524.925.516021.627.42001934.925018.942.631518.149.440016.654.950016.256.763014.960.88001565.7100015.671.8125014.973.7160014.972200015.673.8250014.670.4315014.268.3400014.166.4500014.460.8630014.662.7800014.966.91000015.272.41250015.464.41600015.749.2SPL6470.627.581.7N15.825.3147.9median 15.4median 62.7Delta2.111.345.846.541.439.431.232.33635.935.638.53132.42624.623.724.521.724.919.133.318.244.417.147.615.654.115.356.316.157.81461.313.664.31469.113.671.414.870.914.473.614.670.713.764.913.86414.168.114.37014.664.71561.915.357.515.753.866.864.865.526.680.820.116.518.50.846median 14.8median 61.91.710.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy M31Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy M31 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Huawei P30 Lite New Edition audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 1.6 / 2.3 / 3.7 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 6.7 / 9.4 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy M31
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A41
3500 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh
realme 6 Pro
4300 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
3340 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
46%
35%
30%
28%
16%
32%
Idle Minimum *
1.6
0.96
40%
0.75
53%
0.92
42%
0.95
41%
1.173 (0.9 - 1.6, n=7)
27%
0.932 (0.37 - 2.5, n=228, last 2 years)
42%
Idle Average *
2.3
1.57
32%
2.19
5%
1.79
22%
2.1
9%
2.28 (1.7 - 4.24, n=7)
1%
1.844 (0.82 - 3.94, n=228, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Maximum *
3.7
1.61
56%
2.24
39%
1.88
49%
2.4
35%
2.86 (1.8 - 4.34, n=7)
23%
2.11 (0.85 - 4.2, n=228, last 2 years)
43%
Load Average *
6.7
2.93
56%
3.88
42%
5.41
19%
4.2
37%
5.97 (5 - 6.99, n=7)
11%
4.42 (2.1 - 8.4, n=228, last 2 years)
34%
Load Maximum *
9.4
4.97
47%
5.97
36%
7.59
19%
7.7
18%
7.83 (6.3 - 9.4, n=7)
17%
7.22 (3.16 - 12.3, n=228, last 2 years)
23%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
40h 56min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
22h 04min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
23h 52min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
5h 26min
Samsung Galaxy M31
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A41
3500 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh
realme 6 Pro
4300 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
3340 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
-31%
-12%
-22%
-42%
Reader / Idle
2456
1843
-25%
2336
-5%
1359
-45%
H.264
1432
998
-30%
1096
-23%
802
-44%
WiFi v1.3
1324
650
-51%
1175
-11%
1031
-22%
719
-46%
Load
326
268
-18%
303
-7%
223
-32%

Points positifs

+ robustesse du châssis
+ précision de la navigation
+ autonomie
+ emplacement micro SD dédié
+ partie logicielle récente
+ nombre de fréquences LTE
+ appareil photo
+ luminosité de l'écran

Points négatifs

- performances
- nombre de bloatware
- throttling en cas de sollicitations prolongées
- sautes durant les enregistrements vidéo UHD
- consommation

Verdict

En test : le Samsung Galaxy M31.
En test : le Samsung Galaxy M31.

Peu de temps après son lancement, le Samsung Galaxy M31 est déjà disponible à des prix encore plus abordables. Cela le rend également plus séduisants, ses composants étant un peu moyens. Ses points forts sont une énorme batterie et l'écran AMOLED aux couleurs fidèles.

En revanche, le stockage est tout juste à la hauteur de cette classe, et les performances du Galaxy M31 restent bien en deçà de celles des appareils concurrents de cette gamme de prix. Il faudra aussi supporter un fort throttling en cas de sollicitations, ainsi qu'une chauffe notable. Le Galaxy M31 est également en retrait en ce qui concerne la vitesse du sans-fil.

Même si le Galaxy M31 est un peu limité en ce qui concerne ses composants, il séduit avec une belle autonomie et un bon écran.

Ainsi le smartphone Galaxy est un appareil moyen, plutôt qu'un appareil qui se démarque. Mais avec sa batterie convaincante, son écran lumineux, ses photos correctes, et une partie logicielle réussie avec OneUI aux mises à jour régulières, le Galaxy M31 reste un appareil réussi du milieu de gamme.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Samsung Galaxy M31 - 07/08/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Châssis
80%
Clavier
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositif de pointage
96%
Connectivité
46 / 70 → 66%
Poids
89%
Autonomie
93%
Écran
89%
Performances en jeu
17 / 64 → 27%
Performances dans les applications
50 / 86 → 59%
Chauffe
88%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
68 / 90 → 76%
Appareil photo
61%
Moyenne
73%
80%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Mark Riege
Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 210 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Samsung Galaxy M31 : un smartphone moyen avec quelques points forts
Florian Schmitt, 2020-08-27 (Update: 2020-08-27)